Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. (January 28, 2009). doi:10.3945/jn.108.097618
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/3/629    most recent
jn.108.097618v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lutter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nestler, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lutter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nestler, E. J.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Symposium-Food Addiction: Fact or Fiction?

Homeostatic and Hedonic Signals Interact in the Regulation of Food Intake1,2,3

Michael Lutter* and Eric J. Nestler4

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390

Food intake is regulated by 2 complementary drives: the homeostatic and hedonic pathways. The homeostatic pathway controls energy balance by increasing the motivation to eat following depletion of energy stores. In contrast, hedonic or reward-based regulation can override the homeostatic pathway during periods of relative energy abundance by increasing the desire to consume foods that are highly palatable. In contrast to the consumption of food, the motivation to use drugs of abuse is mediated only by the reward pathway. In this article we review the extensive research that has identified several mechanisms by which repeated exposure to drugs of abuse alters neuronal function and increases the motivational incentive to obtain and use these substances. We then compare our current understanding of drug-induced changes in neuronal reward circuitry with what is known about the consequences of repeated consumption of highly palatable foods such as high-fat and high-sugar diets. Next, we discuss the normal homeostatic regulation of food intake, which is a unique aspect of food addiction. Finally, we discuss the clinical implications of these neuronal adaptations in the context of obesity and neuropsychiatric syndromes such as bulimia nervosa and Prader-Willi syndrome.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.lutter{at}utsouthwestern.edu.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
W. F. Schwindinger, B. M. Borrell, L. C. Waldman, and J. D. Robishaw
Mice lacking the G protein {gamma}3-subunit show resistance to opioids and diet induced obesity
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): R1494 - R1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. M. Avena, P. Rada, and B. G. Hoebel
Sugar and Fat Bingeing Have Notable Differences in Addictive-like Behavior
J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 623 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition