Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. (April 1, 2009). doi:10.3945/jn.107.086199
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow Online Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/5/1022    most recent
jn.107.086199v2
jn.107.086199v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Olney, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Olney, D. K.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Community and International Nutrition

Provision of Multiple Rather Than Two or Fewer Micronutrients More Effectively Improves Growth and Other Outcomes in Micronutrient-Deficient Children and Adults1,2,3

Lindsay H. Allen4,5,*, Janet M. Peerson5 and Deanna K. Olney4

4 USDA, Agricultural Research Service Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA 95616 5 Program in International and Community Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Deficiencies of multiple micronutrients (MMN) usually coexist in developing countries, but supplements have usually provided only 1 or 2 micronutrients (MN). To inform policy, in this article we compared the relative benefits of supplying MMN vs. a placebo or 1 or 2 MN on the following: children's growth, health, and development; pregnancy outcome; nutritional status; and HIV/AIDS mortality and morbidity in adults. Sufficient data were available to perform random-effects meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the effects of MMN on child growth and nutritional status. Results for other outcomes are presented as effect sizes (ES) when available. In children, MMN interventions resulted in small but significantly greater improvements in length or height (ES = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.055, 0.21) and weight (ES = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.029, 0.25), hemoglobin (ES = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.53), serum zinc (ES = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.43), serum retinol (ES = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.050, 0.61), and motor development. A Cochrane review reported that compared with no supplementation or a placebo, MMN supplementation during pregnancy reduced the relative risk of low birth weight (0.83), small-for-gestational age (0.92), and anemia (0.61); however, MMN were not more effective than iron + folic acid alone. There is some evidence that MMN supplementation improves CD4 counts and HIV-related morbidity and mortality in adults. The efficacy of MMN varies across trials, but overall there is evidence that outcomes are better than when providing ≤2 MN. The policy implications of these studies are discussed.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lindsay.allen{at}ars.usda.gov.

Manuscript received 31 December 2007. Initial review completed 25 February 2008. Revision accepted 22 February 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition