![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Family, Consumer and Nutritional Sciences, College of St. Catherine, Arden Hills, MN 55105
The occurrence and impact of fructose in the American food supply has garnered much recent attention in the popular press as well as the scientific community. This paper provides an overview of a workshop cosponsored by the International Life Sciences Institute North America and the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, titled "State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose." Papers in the workshop addressed the chemical composition and properties of dietary sweeteners that contain fructose, the sources and amount of fructose in the American diet, and the metabolism of fructose in the human body. Further, the authors of each paper assessed the strength of the existing data linking dietary fructose intake and risk for overweight, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and other disorders. The assessment considered factors in study design, including the amount fed, the food form, the length of the study, the characteristics of the subjects, the specific methodology, and other potential confounders including diet. In addition to papers assessing the basic science of fructose, some papers also addressed consumer concern about sugars and fructose in the diet, the way fructose and other sugars are presented in the media, and the resulting confusion of consumers about fructose and other sugars in the diet. The purpose of the papers in the aggregate was to clarify what data exist about fructose and what the gaps are in the data and to help both scientists and consumers understand issues surrounding fructose in the food supply.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmjones{at}stkate.edu.
Published online 22 April 2009.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. S. White Comment on: New insights into the epidemiology of gout Rheumatology, March 1, 2010; 49(3): 613 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Murphy The State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose: Summary and Issues to Be Resolved J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1269S - 1270S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Livesey Fructose Ingestion: Dose-Dependent Responses in Health Research J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1246S - 1252S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. White Misconceptions about High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Is It Uniquely Responsible for Obesity, Reactive Dicarbonyl Compounds, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts? J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1219S - 1227S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. H. Moran Fructose and Satiety J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1253S - 1256S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Bantle Dietary Fructose and Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1263S - 1268S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Schaefer, J. A. Gleason, and M. L. Dansinger Dietary Fructose and Glucose Differentially Affect Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1257S - 1262S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. P. Marriott, N. Cole, and E. Lee National Estimates of Dietary Fructose Intake Increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1228S - 1235S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Stanhope and P. J. Havel Fructose Consumption: Considerations for Future Research on Its Effects on Adipose Distribution, Lipid Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Humans J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1236S - 1241S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
