Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fascetti, A. J.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:1053-1060, June 2008


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Cats Are Able to Adapt Protein Oxidation to Protein Intake Provided Their Requirement for Dietary Protein Is Met1,2

Alice S. Green, Jon J. Ramsey, Cecilia Villaverde, Danny K. Asami, Alfreda Wei and Andrea J. Fascetti*

Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8741

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ajfascetti{at}ucdavis.edu.

Cats require more dietary protein than noncarnivorous species. Earlier work showed that cats lack the ability to regulate hepatic urea cycle enzymes in response to dietary protein concentration. We thus hypothesized that cats are unable to fully adapt protein oxidation to protein intake, particularly at low-protein concentrations. We used indirect respiration calorimetry to assess cats' ability to adapt substrate oxidation to diets containing different concentrations of protein, including 1 below their protein requirement. Nine cats (5 males and 4 females; 2.7 ± 0.5 y; 4.49 ± 0.19 kg) consumed each of 4 semipurified diets containing 7.5% [low protein (LP3)], 14.2% [adequate protein (AP)], 27.1% [moderate protein (MP)], and 49.6% [high protein (HP)] of metabolizable energy from protein in a modified crossover design, beginning with the MP diet and then consuming the remaining diets in random order. After adaptation to each diet, cats completed a 5-d nitrogen balance trial and at least 2 12-h indirect calorimetry measurements. There was a significant effect of diet on protein oxidation (P < 0.0001), which measured 10.4 ± 0.5, 14.1 ± 1.0, 25.0 ± 1.7, and 53.2 ± 1.7% of total energy expenditure for the LP, AP, M,P and HP diets, respectively. The ratio of protein oxidation:protein intake was higher with the LP diet (1.39 ± 0.07) than the other 3 diets (AP, 1.00 ± 0.07; MP, 0.93 ± 0.06; HP, 1.07 ± 0.03; P < 0.0001), indicating a net loss of protein with the LP diet. Thus, cats are able to adapt protein oxidation to a wide range of dietary protein concentrations, provided their minimum protein requirement is met.








Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]