Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, J. E.

© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:1701S-1703S, June 2002


Supplement: Waltham International Symposium

Conversion of Essential Fatty Acids by Delta 6-Desaturase in Dog Liver Microsomes

Brent L. Dunbar and John E. Bauer3

Comparative Nutrition Research Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbauer{at}cvm.tamu.edu.

KEY WORDS: {Delta}6-desaturase • liver • dog • microsomes • linoleic acid • kinetics

EXPANDED ABSTRACT

Dietary essential fatty acids (EFAs), linoleic acid [18:2(n-6), LA] and {alpha}-linolenic acid [18:3(n-3), ALA] are converted to long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) by desaturase and chain-elongation enzyme systems (1). The LCPUFAs are important because they serve as eicosanoid precursors. In addition, several LCPUFAs have specific structural and functional roles in development or maintenance of neural tissues such as brain, retina and other tissues (2).

The rate-limiting step for desaturation and elongation is controlled by {Delta}6-desaturase, which adds a double bond at the sixth carbonyl carbon. Hence, LA is converted to 18:3(n-6) and ALA is converted to 18:4(n-3) and competition between these substrates for this enzymatic step exists among the fatty acid families. Some reports indicate a higher specificity for (n-3) fatty acid desaturation compared to that for (n-6) fatty acids (3).

Dogs are important to humans not only as companion animals but also serve as a model for human metabolism (4,5). This study addresses EFA metabolism in dogs using a classical enzyme kinetic approach.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Animals

Fresh liver tissues were removed from 11 normal, healthy Coonhound dogs and three Sprague–Dawley rats at the termination of animal use protocols approved by Texas A&M University Laboratory Animal Use Committee. The animals had been fed once daily and were not denied food before euthanasia. Liver microsomes were prepared with rat serving as a positive control group for enzyme activity determinations.

Microsomal preparation

Liver tissue was immediately transferred to ice-cold saline after collection, blotted dry, minced and rinsed twice with saline. A phosphate buffer (40 mM, Buffer A) containing 0.1 M sucrose (pH 7.4) with tissue-to-buffer ratio of 1:6 was used for homogenization. Homogenates were centrifuged for 20 min at 4°C and 10,000 x g with fixed-angle rotor. Supernates were then centrifuged for 1 h at 4°C and 105,000 x g to pellet the microsomes. Microsomes were resuspended in fresh Buffer A and protein concentrations determined before freezing at -80°C.

Microsomal lipid composition determination

Microsomes were extracted by the method of Folch et al. (6) with internal standards for phospholipids (PL), nonesterified fatty acids (FFA) and triacylglyerol (TG) containing 22:1(n-9). Lipid subclasses were separated by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel plates with 80:20:1 hexane:ether:glacial acetic acid (v/v/v). The PL, FFA and TG were scraped and fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) prepared. Samples were quantified by capillary gas chromatography (GC) on a Restek Stabilwax column (0.32 mm ID x 30 m x 0.25 mm film) with He gas carrier. A temperature program was begun at 170°C, held for 10 min, ramped to 228°C at 2°C/min then held for 20 min.

Incubations

Incubation conditions for ALA as substrate in the absence of malonyl-CoA were determined by independently varying C14-ALA or C14-LA substrate content, protein concentrations and incubation times. Protein (4 mg), 15-min incubation and 50 µM ALA substrate concentration were found to be suitable conditions for {Delta}6-desaturase assay. Incubations were performed at 37°C and each 2-mL incubation mixture contained ATP (6.67 µmol), coenzyme A (0.13 µmol), GSH (3.0 µmol), NADH (1.2 µmol), NADPH (2.5 µmol) and MgCl2 (10 µmol). Reactions were terminated by adding 9 mL of 2:1 (v/v) chloroform/methanol containing 0.1% glacial acetic acid. Water (2 mL) was added and tubes were shaken for 10 min and centrifuged at low speed. A 5-mL aliquot of 3:48:47 (v/v/v) chloroform/methanol/water was used to wash the lipid-containing phase. Tubes were again shaken (10 min) and centrifuged, and chloroform layers were combined then dried under N2 gas.

Saponification and free fatty acid phenacylation

Lipid residues were resuspended in 2 mL of 2.8% KOH in methanol. Samples were saponified under an atmosphere of N2 for 30 min at 85–90°C. After cooling the mixture was acidified and extracted with hexane. To each saponified extract 100 µL 2-bromoacetophenone (10 mg/mL in acetone) was added and mixed, followed by the addition of 100 µL triethylamine solution (10 mg/mL in acetone) to prepare fatty acid phenacyl esters (FAPE) (7). The FAPE were dried under N2 gas and resuspended in methanol.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid scintillation counting (LSC)

The radiolabeled FAPE were fractionated using HPLC on two Novapak C18 (4.6 x 150 mm) columns at 2 mL/min flow. Elution was conducted with a gradient of 70:5:25 acetonitrile:methanol:water (v/v/v) to 90:5:5 acetonitrile:methanol:water (v/v/v) both with 0.1 mL/L glacial acetic acid controlled for the first 25 min using a nonlinear gradient profile (Waters, no. 9; Waters Associates, Milford, MA) then held constant for 33 min. Detection of peaks at 242 nm was performed using retention times of authentic standards. Sample peaks were collected and scintillation cocktail (3 mL) was added to each. The tubes were mixed and radioactivity was counted twice by LSC for 2 min and values averaged.

Statistical analyses

Statistical comparisons between rat and dog lipid analyses were performed using Student’s t-test, with P < 0.05 considered significantly different.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The amounts of conversion of LA to 18:3(n-6) and ALA to 18:4(n-3) were used to calculate maximal velocities (Vmax) and Michaelis–Menten constants (Km). In dogs, {Delta}6-desaturase exhibited a higher Vmax for ALA (50.9 pmol mg protein-1 min-1) compared to that for LA substrate (5.4 pmol mg protein-1 min-1) (Fig. 1). By comparison, rat microsomes showed a {Delta}6-desaturase Vmax of 36.6 pmol mg protein-1 min-1 with ALA substrate and 12.7 pmol mg protein-1 min-1 with LA substrate (data not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Michaelis–Menten and Lineweaver–Burk plots of dog {Delta}6-desaturase with LA and ALA as substrates. (A) Activity vs. ALA concentration with endogenous free LA concentration < 50 µmol/L, open squares; and >50 µmol/L, open circles. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plot of 1/activity (1/V) vs. ALA-1 (1/S). Regression lines represent <50 µmol/L; open squares, >50 µmol/L; open circles, r2 = 0.95, P < 0.0001. (C) Activity vs. LA concentration. (D) Lineweaver–Burk plot of 1/activity vs. 1/LA (1/S). Each data point is the average ± SEM of at least three determinations for ALA and LA. Km and Vmax are as described in the text.

 
Numerous microsome preparations from the dogs were found to contain considerable quantities of LA and ALA activity data were subdivided into two subsets based on LA content. One data set was thus obtained with <50 µmol/L endogenous LA and the other data set contained results from incubations with >50 µmol/L (Fig. 1). Lineweaver–Burk plots of these data showed considerable inhibition of ALA conversion when higher amounts of endogenously LA was present. Calculated values of Km for dog microsomal {Delta}6-desaturase were 20.8 µmol/L using ALA substrate (at low LA) and 41.8 µmol/L with LA substrate (Fig. 1).

Endogenous microsomal fatty acid concentrations in the reaction mixtures were determined with internal standards and GC of the microsomal lipids. Of the three fractions studied (PL, FFA and TG), the PL fraction contributed a majority of endogenous lipid in dog and rat. Total lipids were not substantially different in the dog vs. rat, although PL and FFA were higher in dog than in rat, and TG concentrations were higher in rat. Dog liver microsomes contained approximately 6 times more total FFA than that in rat liver (Table 1) and its LA content was 10 times higher than rat (64.4 ± 61.8 vs. 6.5 ± 0.2 µmol/L ± SD). The contribution to the incubation mixtures from endogenous ALA substrate was 2.4 ± 2.5 µmol/L ± SD in dogs compared to none found in rat (Table 2). The concentrations of dog endogenous microsomal LA in the FFA fraction were considerable compared to rat, which resulted in inhibition of ALA conversion. To correct for this inhibition, a graphical method to correct ALA substrate kinetic values in the presence of high endogenous LA was devised. Given the short incubation times used, the contributions of the PL- and TG-LA were not considered in this correction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Concentration of endogenous microsomal total lipid fatty acids and EFAs in final assay mixture used for {Delta}6-desaturase assays1

 
Graphical analysis of activities vs. endogenous LA concentration was conducted at fixed ALA concentrations (graphs not shown). Each graph showed a significant negative, linear correlation between endogenous LA concentration and enzyme activity. Taking the y-intercept value (i.e., the enzyme activity at an extrapolated endogenous LA concentration of 0 µmol/L) of each line from this series of graphs, it was possible to construct a corrected activity graph (Fig. 2). From these graphs, corrected Km and Vmax values for ALA substrate were calculated as 12.4 µmol/L and 62.4 pmol mg protein-1 min-1, respectively. A similar correction for endogenous ALA concentrations in the assay mixtures when exogenous LA was substrate was unnecessary because the microsomes contained only minor endogenous amounts of ALA (Table 2). Thus the Km and Vmax values with LA as substrate used for comparison were as noted earlier, 41.8 µmol/L and 5.4 pmol mg protein-1 min-1, respectively.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 Graphically corrected dog {Delta}6-desaturase activity vs. ALA concentration at extrapolated LA = 0 µmol/L. Insert graph: Lineweaver–Burk plot of corrected activity data. Km and Vmax are as described in the text.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The Km value provides a useful index of enzyme specificity. Using uncorrected kinetic constants, the Km values determined showed a higher specificity for the ALA substrate than for the LA substrate. Under these conditions, 2 times as much LA was required for {Delta}6-desaturase to reach half-maximal velocity as for ALA. However, once the Km for ALA is reached, desaturation of this substrate occurs 9 times faster than for LA. When the contribution of endogenous lipid substrate available (in the form of FFA-LA) is graphically eliminated, a higher Vmax and lower Km for ALA emerged (62.4 pmol mg protein-1 min-1 and 12.4 µmol/L, respectively). By comparison, on a molar basis, 3 times as much LA substrate would be necessary for {Delta}6-desaturase to reach its half-maximal velocity as for ALA substrate. However, once the Km for ALA is reached, it would be desaturated almost 12 times faster than LA because of its higher Vmax. In either case, these data are consistent with other reports that ALA is a preferential substrate to LA for {Delta}6-desaturase (4,10).

Using human fetal liver microsomes, Rodriguez et al. (8) found a Vmax for ALA {Delta}6-desaturation with ALA substrate higher than that with LA substrate (24.5 vs. 7.5 pmol mg protein-1 min-1, respectively). Also, the Km for ALA (24.5 µmol/L) was higher than that for LA (6.5 µmol/L). However, the endogenous LA contribution was low in the human fetal liver microsomes compared to that in adult rat liver microsomes. Ivanetich et al. (9) also found FFA to significantly contribute to the substrate pool of rat liver microsomes. They reported an endogenous FFA-LA concentration of 2.9 µmol/L (compared to 64.4 µmol/L in dog and 6.5 µmol/L in rat in the present study) and noted that membrane phospholipids make an insignificant contribution to the endogenous fatty acid substrate pool in microsomes. It was concluded that endogenous LA would affect total substrate concentration, specific activity of substrate and product, and rate of product formation as in the present study. Purvis et al. (10) reported that the 2.85–30 µg of endogenous LA substrate/mg protein in pig liver microsomes should also be considered as available substrate. This range of LA is consistent with that seen here for dogs (9.0 µg/mg microsomal protein).

In conclusion, dog liver microsomes are capable of desaturating EFAs. Also, the maximal velocity for {Delta}6-desaturation of ALA is considerably higher than that for LA in vitro, yet the Km constant for LA was at least twice as high as that of ALA. When corrected for endogenous LA concentrations of microsomal enzyme preparations, the differences in Vmax and Km between these two substrates become even more pronounced. Physiologically, ALA concentration may never exceed the Km for desaturation in the absence of high dietary amounts. By contrast, LA amounts are readily converted because most diets for dogs are replete in LA and because microsomal concentrations (64.4 µmol/L) appear to widely exceed the Km. These phenomena help explain low in vivo conversion of ALA in dogs and other species. The findings also suggest that high levels of ALA supplementation may be necessary to exceed the {Delta}6-desaturase Km for this substrate and to significantly affect physiological levels of (n-3) LCPUFA in dogs.

Despite reports of endogenous fatty acids contributing to the total substrate pool for the {Delta}6-desaturase reaction, many authors do not quantitatively report microsomal lipid and fatty acid concentrations in liver microsomes. The elevated endogenous fatty acids present in dog liver microsomes not only act as inhibitors of desaturation in vitro, but also serve as competitive substrate for the reaction. Either highly purified preparations or a correction as applied in the present study is therefore needed. Finally, it should be noted that studies designed to simply measure mRNA abundance of {Delta}6-desaturase mass cannot evaluate the nature of the competitive interactions between LA and ALA. The graphic correction technique used here allows characterization of such enzyme–substrate competition.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Special thanks to Karen Bigley for assistance with assays.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented as part of the Waltham International Symposium: Pet Nutrition Coming of Age held in Vancouver, Canada, August 6–7, 2001. This symposium and the publication of symposium proceedings were sponsored by the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition. Guest editors for this supplement were James G. Morris, University of California, Davis, Ivan H. Burger, consultant to Mars UK Limited, Carl L. Keen, University of California, Davis, and D’Ann Finley, University of California, Davis. Back

2 Supported, in part, by the Mark L. Morris Professorship in Clinical Nutrition at Texas A&M University. Back

4 Abbreviations used: EFA, essential fatty acid; ALA, {alpha}-linolenic acid; LA, linoleic acid, LCPUFA, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid; GC, gas chromatography; TLC, thin-layer chromatography; FAPE, fatty acid phenacyl esters; TG, triacylglycerol; PL, phospholipid; FFA, nonesterifed fatty acid. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Holman, R. T. (1998) The slow recovery of the importance of omega 3 essential fatty acids in human health. J. Nutr. 128:427S-433S.

2. Birch, E. E., Hoffman, D. R., Uauy, R., Birch, D. G. & Prestidge, C. (1998) Visual acuity and the essentiality of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid in the diet of term infants. Pediatr. Res. 44:201-209.[Medline]

3. Maniongui, C., Blond, J. P., Ulmann, L., Durand, G., Poisson, J. P. & Bezard, J. (1993) Age-related changes in {Delta}6 and {Delta}5 desaturase activities in rat liver microsomes. Lipids 28:291-297.[Medline]

4. Lock, E. A., Mitchell, A. M. & Elcombe, C. R. (1989) Biochemical mechanisms of induction of hepatic peroxisome proliferation. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 29:145-163.[Medline]

5. Hulman, S., Kleigman, R., Heng, J. & Crouser, E. (1988) Relationship of substrate level to turnover rate in fasted adult and newborn dogs. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 254:E137-E143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane-Stanley, G. H. (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497-509.[Free Full Text]

7. Chen, H. & Anderson, R. E. (1992) Quantitation of phenacyl esters of retinal fatty acids by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 578:124-129.[Medline]

8. Rodriquez, A., Sarda, P., Nessmann, C., Boulot, P., Leger, C. L. & Descomps, B. (1998) {Delta}6- and {Delta}5-Desaturase activities in the human fetal liver: kinetic aspects. J. Lipid Res. 39:1825-1832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Ivanetich, K. M., Bradshaw, J. J. & Ziman, M. R. (1996) {Delta}6-Desaturase: improved methodology and analysis of the kinetics in a multi-enzyme system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1292:120-132.[Medline]

10. Purvis, J. M., Clandinin, M. T. & Hacker, R. R. (1983) Chain elongation-desaturation of linoleic acid during the development of the pig. Implication for the supply of polyenoic fatty acids to the developing brain. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 75:199-204.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. M. Heinemann, M. K. Waldron, K. E. Bigley, G. E. Lees, and J. E. Bauer
Long-Chain (n-3) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Are More Efficient than {alpha}-Linolenic Acid in Improving Electroretinogram Responses of Puppies Exposed during Gestation, Lactation, and Weaning
J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 1960 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
E. L. Streiff, B. Zwischenberger, R. F. Butterwick, E. Wagner, C. Iben, and J. E. Bauer
A Comparison of the Nutritional Adequacy of Home-Prepared and Commercial Diets for Dogs
J. Nutr., June 1, 2002; 132(6): 1698S - 1700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, J. E.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition