Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damsgaard, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damsgaard, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, L.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:1061-1066, June 2008


Nutrition and Disease

Fish Oil in Combination with High or Low Intakes of Linoleic Acid Lowers Plasma Triacylglycerols but Does Not Affect Other Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Healthy Men1,2

Camilla T. Damsgaard3,*, Hanne Frøkiær4, Anders D. Andersen3 and Lotte Lauritzen3

3 Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark and 4 The Nutritional Immunology Group, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ctd{at}life.ku.dk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Both (n-3) long-chain PUFA (LCPUFA) and linoleic acid [LA, 18:2(n-6)] improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, but a high-LA intake may weaken the effect of (n-3) LCPUFA. In a controlled, double-blind, 2 x 2-factorial 8-wk intervention, we investigated whether fish oil combined with a high- or low-LA intake affects overall CVD risk profile. Healthy men (n = 64) were randomized to 5 mL/d fish oil capsules (FO) [mean intake 3.1 g/d (n-3) LCPUFA] or olive oil capsules (control) and to oils and spreads with either a high (S/B) or a low (R/K) LA content, resulting in a 7.3 g/d higher LA intake in the S/B groups than in the R/K groups. Diet, (n-3) LCPUFA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and plasma CVD risk markers were measured before and after the intervention. FO lowered fasting plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) (P < 0.001) by 51% and 19% in the FO+R/K-group and FO+S/B-group, respectively, which was also reflected in postprandial TAG measured after the intervention (P < 0.01). Although a fat x FO interaction was found for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, neither the FO nor fat intervention affected fasting plasma cholesterol, glucose, insulin, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, oxidized LDL, cluster of differentiation antigen 40 ligand (CD40L), adiponectin, or fasting or postprandial BP or HR after adjustment for body weight changes. In conclusion, neither fish oil supplementation nor the LA intake had immediate pronounced effects on the overall CVD risk profile in healthy men, but fish oil lowered plasma TAG in healthy subjects with initially low concentrations.



    Introduction
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Lifestyle and diet play an important role in the etiology of cardiovascular diseases (CVD).5 Since the 1970s, increased consumption of PUFA and a reduction in SFA have been recommended due to the beneficial effects on serum cholesterol (1). Linoleic acid [LA, 18:2(n-6)] constitutes up to 90% of the dietary PUFA (2). The cholesterol-lowering effect of LA is well described (3), but the dominant role of serum cholesterol in the development of atherosclerosis and for CVD mortality has been debated (4). PUFA of the (n-3) family, in particular (n-3) long-chain PUFA (LCPUFA) from fatty fish and fish oils, have a well-described beneficial effect on CVD risk factors such as plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) (5), blood pressure (BP) (6), and heart rate (HR) (7). (n-3) LCPUFA have also been shown to decrease the risk of sudden death and reduce overall CVD mortality in people with CVD or at high risk for CVD (8,9). (n-3) PUFA are thought to compete with (n-6) PUFA for metabolism, incorporation, and conversion to bioactive substances (10) and a high-LA intake has been argued to increase the dose of (n-3) LCPUFA necessary for beneficial effects (11). Moreover, LA may also increase inflammation and endothelial activation (3,12).

Atherosclerosis is recognized as an inflammatory disease (13) and besides the well-established risk markers, a number of inflammatory markers have been linked to CVD risk. C-reactive protein (CRP) fluctuates widely in response to tissue damage and infection and may be a long-term marker of low-grade inflammation (14). CRP is induced by interleukin (IL)-6 and elevated plasma levels of both have been shown to be independently associated with increased risk of CVD events (1416). Cluster of differentiation antigen 40 (CD40) and its ligand CD40L, which are involved in T- and B-cell activation, have been found in human atherosclerotic plaques and associated with thrombotic risk (17). Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) has also been reported to be elevated in atherosclerotic lesions, but its role as a CVD risk marker is controversial (18,19). The expression of VCAM-1 is induced by CD40L along with other adhesion molecules and selectins (20). During atherogenesis, these molecules and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) from endothelial cells and others promote monocyte recruitment and migration through the endothelium (13,21). In intima, monocytes differentiate into macrophages that play a key role in plaque development by engulfing oxidized LDL (oxLDL). In contrast, adiponectin, a recently discovered peptide secreted from adipocytes, may have antiinflammatory properties and has been shown to be inversely related to fat mass, type II diabetes, and myocardial infarction (22).

A number of randomized trials have investigated the effects of fish oils on classical CVD risk markers, but the effects on risk markers related to inflammation and vascular wall function are not well described. Moreover, to our knowledge, it has not been investigated how fish oil affects the overall CVD risk profile in healthy people at different background LA intakes. Here, we evaluated the effects of 8-wk fish oil supplementation in combination with a high- or low-LA intake on traditional and emerging markers of CVD risk.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Study design and recruitment. The details of this randomized, double-blinded, 2 x 2-factorial study design have been described elsewhere (23). In short, 66 healthy men aged 19–40 y were allocated to capsules containing either 5 mL/d fish oil (FO) (Bio-marine, FFA) or olive oil (OO) (unrefined extra virgin, TAG) for 8 wk. Within each group, they were also allocated to use fats either with a high-LA content (S/B) [sunflower oil and Becel 60 margarine] or a low-LA content (R/K) [rapeseed oil and a rapeseed oil-enriched butterspread, Kaergaarden Light]. Measurements were obtained at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and after an 8-wk washout period (23). Data obtained after the washout period are not reported here. Intake was measured using 4-d weighed dietary records at baseline and in the last week of the intervention. In a 2-wk run-in period prior to the study, the participants were provided with olive oil and butter to standardize their fat consumption and tissue fatty acid composition. The fish intake of the participants was restricted during the run-in and intervention period and they were told to maintain their dietary and lifestyle habits throughout the study.

The study protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of Frederiksberg and Copenhagen (no. KF 01267804) and registered in the NIH clinical trial database (ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00266292). Eligible persons were apparently healthy males aged 18–40 y with no chronic diseases, no regular medication, and no strong allergies who were smoking <5 cigarettes per week, exercising strenuously <7 h/wk, eating homemade meals ≥5 d/wk, and consumed butter, margarine, and/or oil daily. Blood donation or dietary supplements were not allowed 2 mo before or during the study. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. Two participants left the study during the intervention period and 64 participants completed the study.

    Intervention and compliance. The median capsule oil consumption during the intervention was 4.4 mL/d (range 2.0–5.6 mL/d) in both groups, corresponding to a median intake of 3.1 g/d (n-3) LCPUFA (1.8 g/d eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA, 20:5(n-3)] + 0.2 g/d docosapentaenoic acid [DPA, 22:5(n-3)] + 1.1 g/d docosahexaenoic acid [DHA, 22:6(n-3)]) in the FO groups and 3.7 g/d oleic acid [18:1(n-9)] in the OO groups. In the fat intervention, the participants were told to replace their habitual fats used for cooking, baking, and on bread with those we provided. The mean contents per 100 g of the S/B and R/K fats were, respectively: 42.8 g and 18.0 g PUFA (40.3 g and 12.7 g LA; 2.4 g and 5.3 g {alpha}-linolenic acid [18:3(n-3)]); 22.6 g and 42.2 g MUFA; and 10.8 g and 15.9 g SFA [see (23)]. Based on the dietary records, the median consumption of the provided intervention fats was 3.4 g/d spread (0.0–32.5 g/d) and 10.3 g/d oil (0.0–52.5 g/d) and the 4 groups did not differ (P > 0.78; Kruskall-Wallis test). The oils and spreads were kind gifts from Aarhus United Denmark A/S, Unilever Danmark A/S, and Arla Foods amba and the capsules were kindly provided by Pharma Nord ApS. The fats and capsules were packed in identical, neutral containers, randomization was done separately for the fat and capsule intervention, and all participants and investigators were unaware of the allocations until the end of data analysis. As a measure of compliance and tissue incorporation of the FO, the fatty acid composition of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was analyzed. EPA incorporation of PBMC has been shown to be maximal after 2–4 wk supplementation (24).

    Measurements. We measured weight and height using standard procedures. BP was measured in the supine position after a 10-min rest with a volume-oscillometric device (Artcomp, Criticon). All BP recordings were performed on the right arm. Venous blood was sampled from the left forearm after 10 min of supine rest. We instructed the participants to fast for 12 h (except for 0.5 L water), not take any medication or drink alcohol 24 h prior to blood sampling, avoid exercise 36 h before sampling, not to smoke the last week, and to have the same meal every night before the blood sample was taken. We checked these criteria at every visit. After the intervention, we also measured BP, HR, and TAG postprandially, i.e. 2.5 h after a standardized breakfast meal, consumed in 15 min and kindly provided by Arla Foods amba and Lantmännen Schulstad A/S. The meal contained 4000 kJ and 50 g fat (27 g SFA).

    Laboratory analyses. EDTA blood was centrifuged at 3000 x g; 15 min at 20°C within 2 h and plasma was isolated for analysis of cholesterol, TAG, CRP, IL-6, and oxLDL. After 30 min of clotting, serum was isolated by the same centrifugation procedure for analysis of glucose and CD40L concentrations. Heparinized blood was drawn on ice and plasma obtained by centrifugation at 2000 x g; 7 min at 4°C for analysis of insulin, MCP-1, VCAM-1, P-selectin, and adiponectin. Blood sample aliquots for analysis of CRP and glucose were frozen at –20°C and the others were frozen at –80°C. Maximal storage time before analysis was 9 mo.

Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), TAG, and glucose were determined by an automated enzymatic colorimetric principle with commercial kits (Roche Diagnostics) on Cobas Mira Plus (Roche Diagnostic System). Plasma CRP was analyzed with a highly sensitive assay. Together with plasma insulin, this was done with chemiluminescent immunometric kits on Immulite 1000 (all from Diagnostics Product). IL-6, VCAM-1, P-selectin, CD40L, and adiponectin concentrations were determined by ELISA kits from R&D Systems, oxLDL with kits from Mercodia, and MCP-1 with kits from Diaclone. Fibrinogen concentrations were determined by an automated clot assay on an ACL 300 analyzer (ACL Instrumentation Laboratories Scandinavia).

All samples from each person were analyzed on the same day and in the same assay. Inter- and intra-assay variation (expressed as CV%) were 0.7 and 0.8% (TC), 2.7 and 2.6% (LDL-C), 2.3 and 1.9% (HDL-C), 0.7 and 1.8% (TAG), 1.3 and 1.2% (glucose), 7.4 and 6.7% (insulin), not applicable and 2.6% (fibrinogen), 5.1 and 7.3% (CRP), 28 and 7% (MCP-1), 3.5 and 6.6% (VCAM-1), 3.8 and 7.0% (P-selectin), 5.8 and 3.9% (oxLDL), 3.7 and 3.3% (CD40L), and 29 and 10% (adiponectin). According to the manufacturer, IL-6 inter- and intra-assay variation was 11 and <10%. Samples (10%) that were below the CRP detection limit of 0.1 mg/L were defined as 0.05 mg/L. Two CRP and IL-6 values were excluded due to CRP concentrations >10 mg/L, indicating acute inflammation (25).

PBMC isolation and fatty acid analysis were conducted as described in (23). In brief, PBMC were isolated from freshly drawn heparinized blood by density centrifugation and lipids were extracted by the Folch procedure (26) and identified by GC.

    Statistics. As a measure of steady-state insulin resistance, the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index was calculated as [insulin concentration (pmol/L)] x [glucose concentration (mmol/L)]/22.5 (27). Plasma TAG, TC:HDL-C, CRP, MCP-1, VCAM-1, and CD40L were logarithmically transformed and plasma IL-6 was inversely square-root transformed before analysis. Comparisons among the 4 intervention groups at baseline were done in 1-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. Comparisons after the intervention were done in ANCOVA with fat (S/B or R/K) and capsule (FO or OO) as fixed factors and adjustment for values at baseline, after checking for interaction. Smoking (yes/no) and weight changes during the intervention were also tested as possible confounders. Within-group changes were tested with paired t tests. Bivariate correlations were done with Pearson's correlation analysis. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 14.0) and are presented in the text as means ± SD or range or mean (95% CI). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Sample sizes of 15 per group had been calculated to give sufficient power (β = 0.80) to detect differences of 1 SD in the outcome variables.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Diet, anthropometry, and (n-3) LCPUFA status. Anthropometry, BP, smoking, and macronutrient intake did not differ among the groups at baseline (Table 1). The LA intake increased from 4 ± 1 E% (percentage of energy intake) to 7 ± 2 E% in the S/B groups (P < 0.001) but remained constant at 4 ± 1 E% in the R/K groups. Accordingly, the S/B groups had a 7.3 (95% CI, 4.6, 10.0) g/d higher LA intake during the intervention than the R/K groups (P < 0.001). The ALA intake increased slightly in all groups but did not differ significantly among the groups at any time [for further details see (23)]. The S/B groups had a higher PUFA intake (P < 0.001) and a slightly lower MUFA intake (P = 0.02) than the R/K groups, but intakes of energy and total SFA did not differ (23). Body weight increased 0.7 kg (95% CI, 0.0, 1.3) in the FO+S/B group only (P < 0.05). The FO supplements effectively raised the PBMC content of EPA, DPA, and DHA (P < 0.001), but the intake of R/K fats increased PBMC EPA and DPA only slightly. The PBMC EPA content correlated with the FO consumption estimated from the returned capsules (r = 0.50; P = 0.004; n = 31) and was used as a marker of FO compliance and incorporation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Characteristics of the 64 study participants before the start of the intervention1

 
    Traditional cardiovascular risk markers. FO-supplementation significantly lowered plasma TAG, both in the fasting and postprandial states (Table 2). However, the effect on postprandial TAG disappeared when we adjusted for fasting TAG after the intervention. When we included only participants with a baseline TAG-concentration < 1 mmol/L in the analysis, FO-supplementation still lowered TAG (P = 0.004, n = 35). Although plasma TAG concentrations decreased by 51% in the FO+R/K-group, but only by 19% in the FO+S/B-group (Fig. 1), no clear interaction was seen between the capsule and fat intervention (P = 0.10) and the fat intervention did not significantly affect TAG (Table 2). Serum insulin (Table 2) and the HOMA-index (data not shown) were affected by the fat intervention, with lower values in the R/K-groups. This effect disappeared, however, after adjustment for weight changes during the intervention. The fish oil and fat interventions did not consistently affect any of the other traditional risk factors shown (Table 2), plasma fibrinogen, the plasma TC: HDL-C ratio, or fasting or postprandial BP or HR (data not shown). The TAG-lowering effect of FO was supported by a negative dose-response relation between changes in fasting plasma TAG concentrations during the intervention and the changes in PBMC EPA (r = –0.43, P < 0.001, n = 64) and DHA (r = –0.35, P = 0.005, n = 64).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Traditional cardiovascular risk markers in healthy men at baseline and after 8 wk of FO or OO supplementation at 2 levels of LA intake12

 

Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1  Changes in plasma TAG concentrations in healthy men at baseline and after 8 wk of FO or OO supplementation at 2 levels of LA intake. Values are means ± SEM, n = 64. #Different from corresponding OO group (2-way ANOVA).

 
    Emerging inflammatory cardiovascular risk markers. Plasma IL-6 and CRP were correlated at both visits (r > 0.46; P < 0.001), whereas plasma adiponectin was not associated with IL-6, CRP, or bodyweight (data not shown). There was a significant capsule x fat interaction on MCP-1 (Table 3). When the capsule groups were analyzed separately, a significantly higher MCP-1 occurred with R/K compared with S/B but only in participants who received OO capsules (P = 0.02). Neither intervention affected CRP, IL-6, VCAM-1, adiponectin (Table 3), P-selectin, oxLDL, or CD40L (data not shown). Plasma oxLDL was correlated with LDL-C at both visits (r > 0.80; P < 0.001), but none of the changes in emerging inflammatory risk markers were associated with changes in either PBMC EPA or DHA (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Emerging inflammatory cardiovascular risk markers measured in serum or plasma from healthy men at baseline and after 8-wk of FO or OO supplementation at 2 levels of LA intake1,2

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In this study, we investigated how fish oil alone and in combination with increased LA intake affected CVD risk markers in healthy men. Although little effect of either intervention was seen, our results indicate that the FO+R/K group had the most beneficial changes in the CVD risk profile. We found that both fasting and postprandial plasma TAG concentrations were lowered by fish oil in subjects who already had low plasma TAG concentrations. This is in contrast to most other CVD risk markers, which are mainly affected in high-risk individuals. The plasma TAG concentration reduction is a well-described effect of fish oil (5,23), but few randomized trials have investigated the effects of fish oil on TAG in individuals with low habitual TAG concentrations (<1 mmol/L) as in our population.

Davidson (28) recently proposed a mechanistic model for the hypotriglyceridemic effect of (n-3) LCPUFA. This involves the coordinated action of at least 4 metabolic nuclear receptors (including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and X receptors), which overall redirects fat from storage toward oxidation, thereby reducing VLDL synthesis and TAG concentrations. In the present study, the TAG-lowering effect of fish oil was numerically greatest, although not statistically significant, in the group that also received the low-LA fats (Fig. 1). This may indicate a combined effect of FO and R/K or may be due to the tendency for the FO+R/K group to have a numerically higher TAG concentration at baseline (Table 2). Two systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials reported that the TAG-lowering effect of fish oil depends on TAG concentrations at baseline (5,29).

The high-LA fats (S/B) did not decrease plasma cholesterol levels; rather, the opposite tendency was seen (P = 0.10 for TC). Based on the equations of Hegsted et al. [reviewed in (30)], the achieved 3 E% increase in dietary LA would be expected to lower TC by only <0.1 mmol/L. Also, in other studies where comparable differences in the (n-6) PUFA intake (31) or larger differences in the LA intake (32) were investigated, plasma cholesterol was not affected. Although modest increases in LDL-C and HDL-C concentrations have been observed, the lack of effect of fish oil on cholesterol variables is well known (5,29).

Fish oil was shown to lower ambulatory BP in 2 meta-analyses (6,33) but mainly in older, hypertensive subjects, whereas the effect in young, normotensive subjects is negligible (6,33). Fish oil has also been shown to reduce HR (7), but even with 24-h continuous HR measurements, little effect is seen in persons with an already low HR, i.e. < ~70 beats/min (7,34), as in our study (data not shown). Fish oil has been speculated to impair the regulation of glucose metabolism in diabetics. However, consistent with our data, fish oil did not affect fasting insulin or glucose or glucose tolerance in healthy men (35), also after taking into account the (n-6):(n-3) PUFA ratio in the habitual diet (36). In another study, insulin sensitivity was not affected by fish oil either at high or low (n-6) PUFA intake (31). Fasting levels and the HOMA index, as used in our study, are not optimal measures of insulin sensitivity. However, our data support the literature, because the slight effects of the low-LA fats on insulin and the HOMA index were explained by changes in body weight.

Neither of the interventions clearly affected any of the emerging inflammatory CVD risk markers. Although a study in rheumatoid arthritis patients showed reductions in CRP after fish oil supplementation (37), the few studies in healthy individuals have showed no clear effect on serum CRP (38,39) and inconsistent results on plasma IL-6 (40,41). Also, Liou et al. (32) found no effects of a high (10E%) vs. low (4E%) LA intake on CRP or IL-6 in healthy men. In contrast with the promising findings in vitro (19), the evidence on the effect of (n-3) PUFA on soluble chemoattractants and adhesion molecules in healthy individuals is sparse and inconsistent (4146) and some studies suggest that fish oil-induced reductions in VCAM-1 may occur in older subjects only (42,43). Moreover, soluble VCAM-1 levels are difficult to interpret, because they originate from molecules shed, for example, from endothelial cells and are thought to reflect a high expression on the cells, which may be an oversimplification. To our knowledge, the effects of fish oil on circulating MCP-1, oxLDL, and CD40L have not been investigated in healthy humans. The MCP-1 lowering in the OO+S/B group is difficult to explain and may be a LA effect or a chance finding. In a study among hypertensive subjects, fish oil increased the oxidizability of LDL (47), but plasma oxLDL did not differ in our study. Following an acute myocardial infarction, 300 patients were randomized to 4 g/d fish oil or corn oil for ≥1 y, resulting in decreased soluble CD40L, but in both groups (48). As reviewed by Vanschoonbek et al. (49), some studies have shown effects of (n-3) PUFA on various hemostatic factors. However, in line with our results, trials in healthy adults (35,50) and patients (51) have shown no effect of fish oil on blood fibrinogen levels or other hemostatic factors.

To our knowledge, we are also the first to investigate the effects of fish oil on soluble adiponectin in healthy, normal-weight humans. In rodents and obese humans, EPA increased serum adiponectin (52), an effect that has been inversely associated with the risk of CVD events (22). In an uncontrolled dietary intervention study, a concomitant increase in the intake of fish and rapeseed oil while avoiding (n-6) PUFA-rich oils also increased serum adiponectin (53). However, in our highly controlled and standardized setting, plasma adiponectin was not affected in healthy subjects.

Greater differences in the LA intake among the fat groups would have been desirable but would have required expensive, fully controlled diets with modified foodstuffs. We might have seen more profound changes in our risk markers with older, less healthy participants, but the focus of this study was early prevention. The choice of olive oil as the capsule placebo can be criticized, because, despite the reported neutral effects of monounsaturated fatty acids on plasma cholesterol (30), olive oil contains antiinflammatory compounds (54). However, we did not want to interfere with our dietary fat intervention by providing, for example, an (n-6) PUFA-rich oil as the placebo. Because no changes were seen in the OO groups during the intervention, the olive oil does not seem to have affected our results.

We conclude that 8 wk of fish oil supplementation lowers plasma TAG concentrations even in subjects with initially low plasma TAG. None of the other traditional or emerging markers of inflammation and CVD risk were affected, neither by fish oil alone nor in combination with varying background dietary LA intakes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Michael Seest, Stine Bartelt, Hanne Jensen, and Berit Hoielt for their help with data collection and Elin Skytte and Pia Madsen for conducting most of the laboratory analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the National Danish Research Council for Agriculture and by the Danish Heart Foundation. Back

2 Author disclosures: C. T. Damsgaard, H. Frøkiær, A. D. Andersen and L. Lauritzen, no conflicts of interest. Back

5 Abbreviations used: BP, blood pressure; CD40L, cluster of differentiation antigen 40 ligand; CRP, C-reactive protein; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid, E%, percentage of energy intake; FO, fish oil capsule; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment, HR, heart rate; IL, interleukin; LA, linoleic acid; LCPUFA, long-chain PUFA; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; OO, olive oil capsule; oxLDL, oxidized LDL; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; R/K, low-LA fats; S/B, high-LA fats; TAG, triacylglycerol; TC, total cholesterol; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Back

Manuscript received 4 December 2007. Initial review completed 9 January 2008. Revision accepted 13 March 2008.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. WHO. The prevention of coronary heart disease. Geneva: WHO; 1982. Report No.: 678.

2. Kris-Etherton PM, Taylor DS, Yu-Poth S, Huth P, Moriarty K, Fishell V, Hargrove RL, Zhao G, Etherton TD. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food chain in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:S179–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Kris-Etherton PM, Hecker KD, Binkoski AE. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular health. Nutr Rev. 2004;62:414–26.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. De Lorgeril M, Salen P. Cholesterol lowering and mortality: time for a new paradigm? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16:387–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Harris WS. n-3 fatty acids and serum lipoproteins: human studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:S1645–1654.

6. Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ, Grobbee DE, Donders AR, Kok FJ. Blood pressure response to fish oil supplementation: metaregression analysis of randomized trials. J Hypertens. 2002;20:1493–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Mozaffarian D, Geelen A, Brouwer IA, Geleijnse JM, Zock PL, Katan MB. Effect of fish oil on heart rate in humans: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2005;112:1945–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Meier G. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2002;112:298–304.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB. Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA. 2006;296:1885–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Lauritzen L, Hansen HS, Jorgensen MH, Michaelsen KF. The essentiality of long chain n-3 fatty acids in relation to development and function of the brain and retina. Prog Lipid Res. 2001;40:1–94.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Hibbeln JR, Nieminen LR, Blasbalg TL, Riggs JA, Lands WE. Healthy intakes of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids: estimations considering worldwide diversity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:S1483–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Dubnov G, Berry EM. Omega-6 fatty acids and coronary artery disease: the pros and cons. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6:441–6.[Medline]

13. Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1685–95.[Free Full Text]

14. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;321:199–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation. 2000;101:1767–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. St-Pierre AC, Cantin B, Bergeron J, Pirro M, Dagenais GR, Despres JP, Lamarche B. Inflammatory markers and long-term risk of ischemic heart disease in men: a 13-year follow-up of the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Atherosclerosis. 2005;182:315–21.[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Novo S, Basili S, Tantillo R, Falco A, Davi V, Novo G, Corrado E, Davi G. Soluble CD40L and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2005;36:673–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Malik I, Danesh J, Whincup P, Bhatia V, Papacosta O, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Haskard D. Soluble adhesion molecules and prediction of coronary heart disease: a prospective study and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001;358:971–6.[CrossRef][Medline]

19. De Caterina R, Madonna R, Massaro M. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cytokines and adhesion molecules. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6:485–91.[Medline]

20. Henn V, Slupsky JR, Grafe M, Anagnostopoulos I, Forster R, Muller-Berghaus G, Kroczek RA. CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells. Nature. 1998;391:591–4.[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Hoogeveen RC, Morrison A, Boerwinkle E, Miles JS, Rhodes CE, Sharrett AR, Ballantyne CM. Plasma MCP-1 level and risk for peripheral arterial disease and incident coronary heart disease: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Atherosclerosis. 2005;183:301–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Pischon T, Girman CJ, Hotamisligil GS, Rifai N, Hu FB, Rimm EB. Plasma adiponectin levels and risk of myocardial infarction in men. JAMA. 2004;291:1730–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Damsgaard CT, Frokiaer H, Lauritzen L. The effects of fish oil and high or low linoleic acid intake on fatty acid composition of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:147–54.[Medline]

24. Gibney MJ, Hunter B. The effects of short- and long-term supplementation with fish oil on the incorporation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids into cells of the immune system in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47:255–9.[Medline]

25. Clyne B, Olshaker JS. The C-reactive protein. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:1019–25.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497–509.[Free Full Text]

27. Hrebicek J, Janout V, Malincikova J, Horakova D, Cizek L. Detection of insulin resistance by simple quantitative insulin sensitivity check index QUICKI for epidemiological assessment and prevention. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:144–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Davidson MH. Mechanisms for the hypotriglyceridemic effect of marine omega-3 fatty acids. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:27i–33i.[Medline]

29. Balk EM, Lichtenstein AH, Chung M, Kupelnick B, Chew P, Lau J. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on serum markers of cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review. Atherosclerosis. 2006;189:19–30.[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Kris-Etherton PM, Yu S. Individual fatty acid effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins: human studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:S1628–44.[Medline]

31. Brady LM, Lovegrove SS, Lesauvage SV, Gower BA, Minihane AM, Williams CM, Lovegrove JA. Increased n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids do not attenuate the effects of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on insulin sensitivity or triacylglycerol reduction in Indian Asians. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:983–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Liou YA, King DJ, Zibrik D, Innis SM. Decreasing linoleic acid with constant alpha-linolenic acid in dietary fats increases (n-3) eicosapentaenoic acid in plasma phospholipids in healthy men. J Nutr. 2007;137:945–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Morris MC, Sacks F, Rosner B. Does fish oil lower blood pressure? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Circulation. 1993;88:523–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Dyerberg J, Eskesen DC, Andersen PW, Astrup A, Buemann B, Christensen JH, Clausen P, Rasmussen BF, Schmidt EB, et al. Effects of trans- and n-3 unsaturated fatty acids on cardiovascular risk markers in healthy males. An 8 weeks dietary intervention study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1062–70.[CrossRef][Medline]

35. Marckmann P, Bladbjerg EM, Jespersen J. Dietary fish oil (4 g daily) and cardiovascular risk markers in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3384–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Giacco R, Cuomo V, Vessby B, Uusitupa M, Hermansen K, Meyer BJ, Riccardi G, Rivellese AA. Fish oil, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in healthy people: is there any effect of fish oil supplementation in relation to the type of background diet and habitual dietary intake of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;17:572–80.[Medline]

37. Sundrarjun T, Komindr S, Archararit N, Dahlan W, Puchaiwatananon O, Angthararak S, Udomsuppayakul U, Chuncharunee S. Effects of n-3 fatty acids on serum interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor p55 in active rheumatoid arthritis. J Int Med Res. 2004;32:443–54.[Medline]

38. Madsen T, Christensen JH, Blom M, Schmidt EB. The effect of dietary n-3 fatty acids on serum concentrations of C-reactive protein: a dose-response study. Br J Nutr. 2003;89:517–22.[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Geelen A, Brouwer IA, Schouten EG, Kluft C, Katan MB, Zock PL. Intake of n-3 fatty acids from fish does not lower serum concentrations of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1440–2.[CrossRef][Medline]

40. Chan DC, Watts GF, Barrett PH, Beilin LJ, Mori TA. Effect of atorvastatin and fish oil on plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations in individuals with visceral obesity. Clin Chem. 2002;48:877–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Ciubotaru I, Lee YS, Wander RC. Dietary fish oil decreases C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and triacylglycerol to HDL-cholesterol ratio in postmenopausal women on HRT. J Nutr Biochem. 2003;14:513–21.[CrossRef][Medline]

42. Miles EA, Thies F, Wallace FA, Powell JR, Hurst TL, Newsholme EA, Calder PC. Influence of age and dietary fish oil on plasma soluble adhesion molecule concentrations. Clin Sci (Lond). 2001;100:91–100.[Medline]

43. Thies F, Miles EA, Nebe-von-Caron G, Powell JR, Hurst TL, Newsholme EA, Calder PC. Influence of dietary supplementation with long-chain n-3 or n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on blood inflammatory cell populations and functions and on plasma soluble adhesion molecules in healthy adults. Lipids. 2001;36:1183–93.[Medline]

44. Eschen O, Christensen JH, De CR, Schmidt EB. Soluble adhesion molecules in healthy subjects: a dose-response study using n-3 fatty acids. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;14:180–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

45. Baro L, Fonolla J, Pena JL, Martinez-Ferez A, Lucena A, Jimenez J, Boza JJ, Lopez-Huertas E. n-3 Fatty acids plus oleic acid and vitamin supplemented milk consumption reduces total and LDL cholesterol, homocysteine and levels of endothelial adhesion molecules in healthy humans. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:175–82.[Medline]

46. Berstad P, Seljeflot I, Veierod MB, Hjerkinn EM, Arnesen H, Pedersen JI. Supplementation with fish oil affects the association between very long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in serum non-esterified fatty acids and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Clin Sci (Lond). 2003;105:13–20.[Medline]

47. Suzukawa M, Abbey M, Howe PR, Nestel PJ. Effects of fish oil fatty acids on low density lipoprotein size, oxidizability, and uptake by macrophages. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:473–84.[Abstract]

48. Aarsetoy H, Brugger-Andersen T, Hetland O, Grundt H, Nilsen DW. Long term influence of regular intake of high dose n-3 fatty acids on CD40-ligand, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and matrix metalloproteinase-9 following acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:329–36.[Medline]

49. Vanschoonbeek K, de Maat MP, Heemskerk JW. Fish oil consumption and reduction of arterial disease. J Nutr. 2003;133:657–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Agren JJ, Vaisanen S, Hanninen O, Muller AD, Hornstra G. Hemostatic factors and platelet aggregation after a fish-enriched diet or fish oil or docosahexaenoic acid supplementation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1997;57:419–21.[CrossRef][Medline]

51. Woodman RJ, Mori TA, Burke V, Puddey IB, Barden A, Watts GF, Beilin LJ. Effects of purified eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on platelet, fibrinolytic and vascular function in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2003;166:85–93.[Medline]

52. Itoh M, Suganami T, Satoh N, Tanimoto-Koyama K, Yuan X, Tanaka M, Kawano H, Yano T, Aoe S, et al. Increased adiponectin secretion by highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid in rodent models of obesity and human obese subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1918–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Guebre-Egziabher F, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Bonnet F, Bastard JP, Desage M, Skilton MR, Vidal H, Laville M. Nutritional intervention to reduce the n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio increases adiponectin concentration and fatty acid oxidation in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug 15 (E-pub ahead of print).

54. Beauchamp GK, Keast RS, Morel D, Lin J, Pika J, Han Q, Lee CH, Smith AB, Breslin PA. Phytochemistry: ibuprofen-like activity in extra-virgin olive oil. Nature. 2005;437:45–6.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damsgaard, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damsgaard, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, L.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition