Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supporting Material
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoppler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walczyk, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoppler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walczyk, T.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:878-884, May 2008


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Ferritin-Iron Is Released during Boiling and In Vitro Gastric Digestion1–3,

Matthias Hoppler4,*, Andrea Schönbächler4, Leo Meile5, Richard F. Hurrell4 and Thomas Walczyk6

4 Laboratory of Human Nutrition and 5 Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland and 6 Department of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mhoppler{at}ethz.ch.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Biofortification of staple foods with iron in the form of ferritin-iron is a promising approach to fighting iron-deficiency anemia in developing countries. However, contradictory results regarding iron bioavailability to humans from ferritin are not yet fully clarified. Furthermore, the question has been raised whether ferritin can potentially survive gastric passage intact and be absorbed via a ferritin-specific uptake mechanism. We studied changes of ferritin-iron and protein during cooking and in vitro gastric digestion. Water soluble, native ferritin-iron, measured in different legumes, represented 18% (soybeans) up to maximally 42% (peas) of total seed iron. Ferritin-iron was no longer detectable after boiling the legumes for 50 min in excess water. When the same cooking treatment was applied to recombinant bean ferritin propagated in Escherichia coli, some ferritin-iron remained measurable. During in vitro gastric digestion of recombinant bean ferritin and red kidney bean extract, ferritin-iron was fully released from the protein and dissolved at pH 2. Stability tests at varying pH at 37°C showed that the release of ferritin-iron starts at pH 5 and is complete at pH 2. We concluded that ferritin-iron is efficiently released from the ferritin molecule during cooking and at gastric pH and that it should be absorbed as efficiently as all other nonheme iron in food.



    Introduction
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Anemia is still one of the major public health challenges on a global scale with an estimated 2 billion people affected worldwide (1); 1 billion of these suffer from iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). The major consequences of IDA are poor pregnancy outcome, reduced cognitive and motor development in infants, decreased immune function, and tiredness and reduced work capacity (24). An insufficient supply of bioavailable iron to the body is a major factor in the etiology of IDA. Supplementation with pharmaceutical iron preparations, food fortification, and dietary diversification are possible strategies to combat iron deficiency and IDA (5). An alternative strategy currently being explored is biofortification, which involves increasing the iron content of staple crops either by conventional plant breeding or genetic engineering (6). Biofortification can reach all population groups, including people with low incomes. It is potentially more sustainable than other approaches because recurrent costs are low, following a 1-time investment of developing suitable seed varieties (7,8).

Increasing the ferritin content of seeds is currently considered the most promising approach to biofortifying staple foods, such as rice, wheat, cassava, or beans, with iron (9). Ferritin serves as an iron storage protein in virtually all living organisms, including bacteria, plants, and animals. It consists of 24 subunits that are assembled into a spherical shell that can store up to 4500 Fe(III) atoms in its inner cavity in the form of an iron oxyhydroxide-phosphate mineral. Lines of transgenic rice and maize that express soybean ferritin (Glycine max) or common bean ferritin (Phaseolus vulgaris) have already been developed (1012). However, a basic requirement for the successful implementation of a biofortified crop is an adequate bioavailability of the respective nutrient. For ferritin-iron, contradictory results have been published from several human studies, either showing good (1316) or poor (1721) iron absorption from ferritin. These differences have been associated with isotopic labeling of ferritin-iron. It has been suggested that labeling of animal ferritin under inflammatory conditions, as employed in the studies showing poor iron bioavailability, may have led to a ferritin molecule that releases iron less readily (9). Recently, it was proposed that ferritin is resistant to digestion in the gastrointestinal tract and that it might even be absorbed intact by the mucosal cell (14). Such a mechanism would protect ferritin-iron from interactions with iron absorption inhibitors, like phytic acid or polyphenols, which are largely responsible for the low bioavailability of iron from plant sources (22,23). In this study, we evaluated the iron bioavailability of ferritin by monitoring the degradation of the ferritin molecule and the release of iron from its mineral core during cooking and simulated gastric conditions. If ferritin is degraded and ferritin-iron released during cooking and gastric digestion, ferritin-iron would be expected to enter the common nonheme iron pool and be absorbed to the same extent as other nonheme food iron.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Materials. Dry peas, red kidney beans, white beans, and soy beans were purchased at local supermarkets in Zurich, Switzerland.

We have described the expression and isolation of recombinant bean (P. vulgaris) ferritin in detail elsewhere (24). Briefly, Escherichia coli cells were transformed with the expression plasmid pET 28a(+) (Novagene) containing ferritin cDNA from P. vulgaris (25). The bacterial culture was grown overnight at 37°C in M9 medium containing kanamycin (30 mg/L) and chloramphenicol (34 mg/L). Expression of ferritin was induced by adding isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside to the medium to a final concentration of 1 mmol/L together with iron at a concentration of 0.2 mmol/L for incorporation into ferritin. Recombinant bean ferritin was isolated by a 2-step procedure by ion exchange chromatography using a diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) Sepharose column (10 by 1.6 cm; GE Healthcare) followed by gel filtration using a Sephacryl S-300 column (2.6 by 60 cm). The purified ferritin was stored in 50% glycerol at –20°C. The protein concentration of the ferritin solution was determined by the Bradford method (26).

    Quantification of total iron. The iron content of legumes and ferritin were analyzed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GF-AAS, AA240Z, Varian). Legumes were ground under liquid nitrogen with a rotor mill (ZM1, Retsch) using a titanium sieve (0.25 mm mesh) and successively mineralized by microwave digestion (MLS ETHOS plus, MLS GmbH) using an HNO3/H2O2 mixture. A commercial iron standard (Titrisol, Merck) was used for external calibration.

    Iron speciation and quantification of ferritin-iron. Dry peas, white beans, red kidney beans, and soybeans were ground under liquid nitrogen and then suspended in a 10-fold volume of ice-cold phosphate buffer (50 mmol/L sodium phosphate, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 1% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, pH 7). Proteins were extracted after homogenization with a Polytron (PT1200 E, Kinematica). After centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 20 min, the supernatant was separated from the sediment. For cooking and digestion experiments, the recombinant bean ferritin solution and legume extracts were analyzed for ferritin-iron content by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 column with a fractionation range of 10–600 kDa (1 x 30 cm, GE Healthcare) and phosphate buffer for elution (0.15 mmol/L sodium phosphate, 0.15 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7). Protein elution was monitored spectrophotometrically at 280 nm. Fractions of 4 mL were collected and iron content was measured in each fraction by GF-AAS. Ferritin-iron eluted from the column ~20 min after sample injection. For pea extract, it was verified whether all the iron collected in this fraction was ferritin-bound. The collected fraction was desalted and further purified by ion exchange chromatography using a DEAE column (GE Healthcare) with a NaCl gradient of 0–0.5 mol/L. Iron containing fractions after ion exchange chromatography were pooled and concentrated by ultrafiltration. The concentrated sample was applied to native PAGE. Iron in gels was stained as Prussian blue [2% K4Fe(CN)6 solution in 2% HCl]. For phosphorus quantification in recombinant bean ferritin, the phosphate buffer was removed and exchanged with 18 M{Omega} water (NANOpure system, Barnstead/Thermolyne) by using ultrafiltration spin columns (Vivaspin, Sartorius AG) and passing 18 M{Omega} water 5 times through the columns. Phosphorus content was determined by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma MS (Neptune, Thermo Scientific) by external calibration using a gravimetrically prepared standard.

    Ferritin stability during cooking. To investigate the stability of ferritin during cooking, recombinant bean ferritin and different legume seeds were boiled in a 5-fold volume of 18 M{Omega} water for 50 min (recombinant bean ferritin, dry peas, red kidney beans, and soybeans) or 100 min (white beans) until tender. Cooking experiments were repeated with 1 mmol/L EDTA (pH 7) in the cooking water. EDTA was added to allow the detection of ferrous or ferric iron in the soluble fraction. In the absence of a chelator, free iron was poorly soluble at neutral pH and would precipitate. The legumes were cooled down after cooking and a phosphate buffer was added to 10-fold the sample volume. Cooked legumes were blended using a hand blender and homogenized with a Polytron. The samples were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C and the supernatant was loaded onto the gel filtration column for ferritin separation.

    Ferritin stability at different pH and in the presence of EDTA. To assess ferritin stability during digestion, recombinant bean ferritin was exposed to a pH range that could be expected in the human stomach. Ferritin was warmed up to 37°C and pH adjusted to 7, 5, 3.5, and 2, respectively, by the addition of 0.1 mol/L HCl. Samples were flushed with argon to prevent oxidation and were incubated in a shaking water bath at 37°C in the dark. Aliquots were taken after 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively, and pH adjusted to 7 using 0.1 mol/L NaOH. After centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatant was applied to the gel filtration column for ferritin separation. For experiments with EDTA, ferritin stability in the presence of EDTA was verified by incubating recombinant bean ferritin at neutral pH in a shaking water bath at 37°C in a 1 mmol/L EDTA solution. Aliquots were taken after 15, 30, 60, and 120 min and ferritin was separated as described earlier.

    Pepsin/HCl digestion. Gastric digestion of recombinant bean ferritin and red kidney bean extract was simulated in vitro using a modification of the procedure of Miller et al. (27). For digestion, 40 mg pepsin/g protein (pepsin from porcine stomach mucosa, Sigma-Aldrich) were added and pH was adjusted to 2 by adding 0.1 mol/L HCl. The mixture was incubated in a shaking water bath at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, pH was adjusted to 7 using an aqueous NaOH solution. EDTA was then added to a final concentration of 1 mmol/L in the digest to prevent precipitation of solubilized iron at neutral pH. After centrifugation at 20,000 g for 20 min at 4°C, the supernatant was applied to the gel filtration column for ferritin separation.

    Kinetics of ferritin degradation during simulated pepsin/HCl digestion. Recombinant bean ferritin and raw and cooked peas were subjected to an in vitro procedure that simulated gastric conditions. Pepsin was added in the same concentration as described above. The acidity of the solution was lowered stepwise to mimic a transient change, as reported for the human stomach during gastric digestion (2830). Digestion was initiated by lowering the pH to 5 (t = 0) to imitate the higher pH due to the postprandial buffering effect of a meal in the stomach (29). The pH was then lowered in 3 steps by adding 0.1 mol/L HCl to pH 3.5 after 15 min, to pH 2.5 after 30 min, and to pH 2 after 60 min, respectively. Experiments were terminated at 120 min. Samples were incubated at 37°C in a shaking water bath in the dark and were kept under argon to protect samples from oxidation. Aliquots for ferritin-iron determination were taken after 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. After digestion, pH was adjusted to 7 using 0.1 mol/L NaOH to mimic pH conditions in the duodenum as the predominant stage of intestinal iron absorption. Samples were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C and applied to the gel filtration column for ferritin separation.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Characterization of recombinant bean ferritin. P. vulgaris ferritin was expressed in E. coli and used to study ferritin stability during cooking and digestion. Purity and characteristic properties of the recombinant ferritin were the same as previously described (24), as assessed by SDS PAGE and native PAGE stained for protein and iron. In the presence of FeSO4 in the bacterial growth medium, purified recombinant bean ferritin contained ~1,000 Fe atoms per ferritin molecule. This degree of iron saturation of ferritin is well within the range found in various plant ferritins (3133). Phosphorus quantification showed a molar iron to phosphorus ratio of 4.2:1, which is in the typical range reported for plant ferritins (34,35). When purified recombinant bean ferritin was separated on a Superdex 200 column, it was recovered in fraction A3 ~20 min after injection (Fig. 1A). An amount of >95% of total iron of the purified recombinant bean ferritin solution was recovered in this fraction.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1  Size exclusion chromatogram of recombinant bean ferritin using a Superdex 200 column (see Materials and Methods). Untreated recombinant bean ferritin (A); recombinant bean ferritin after incubation for 30 min at pH 5 (B). Collected 4-mL fractions are labeled A1–A7. Ferritin eluted into fraction A3 and ferritin oligomers into fraction A2 near the void volume of the column. Iron concentration was measured in all fractions by GF-AAS.

 
    Method for quantification of ferritin-iron. Gel filtrations of recombinant bean ferritin and iron measurements were performed in 3 independent runs to assess the reproducibility of the method. Iron concentration (mean ± SD) in ferritin-containing fraction A3 (Fig. 1A) was 36.5 ± 0.9 µg Fe/g injected recombinant ferritin solution, yielding good reproducibility as judged by the resulting CV of 2.5%. The data presented for cooking and digestion studies were based on single experiments. After incubation of recombinant bean ferritin at pH 5, the elution profile changed and an additional peak was observed 16 min after injection (Fig. 1B, fraction A2). Because molecules of higher molecular weight elute earlier from a gel filtration column, this fraction can be expected to correspond to aggregated ferritin molecules. Ferritin aggregation has already been observed and described in earlier studies (36,37). For the ferritin-iron quantification in legumes, we found that fraction A3 after gel filtration of pea extract contains only ferritin-iron: during separation of fraction A3 over a DEAE column, all iron quantitatively eluted into fractions at NaCl concentrations of 0.15–0.25 mol/L, which is typical for ferritin (32,3840). The pooled iron containing fractions showed 1 single band in native PAGE when stained for iron. This band displayed the same mobility as pure recombinant bean ferritin (Supplemental Fig. 1).

    Ferritin stability during cooking. Iron speciation was studied in recombinant bean ferritin and different legumes by gel filtration before and after cooking. Soybeans showed the lowest soluble ferritin-iron content of 18% of total seed iron, and peas the highest at 42% (Table 1). After cooking for 50–100 min in boiling water, the soluble ferritin-iron content of the 4 analyzed legumes was below the detection limit of the applied method of 5% relative to total iron content of the seeds. Similar observations were made for solutions of recombinant bean ferritin after cooking. Ferritin-iron that was recovered after cooking was found to be 8% for recombinant bean ferritin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Speciation of iron in different legumes before and after boiling for 50–100 min in H2O at 100°C in the presence and absence of EDTA in the boiling water

 
    Ferritin stability at different pH and in the presence of EDTA. When recombinant bean ferritin was incubated at 37°C at different pH conditions, a progressive degradation of the molecule over time could already be observed at pH 5, whereas ferritin stability was not affected at pH 7 under comparable conditions (Fig. 2). At pH 3.5, amounts of ferritin-iron were found to decrease progressively over 2 h. No ferritin-iron could be detected within 15 min after adjusting the pH of the solution to 2. At pH 5 and pH 3.5, the formation of ferritin oligomers occurred after 15 min that were detectable until termination of the experiments after 120 min (Fig. 2B,C). The formation of ferritin oligomers could not be observed at pH 2. EDTA (1 mmol/L) had no detectable effect on ferritin stability when ferritin was incubated over 2 h at 37°C (Fig. 2E).


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2  Stability of recombinant bean ferritin at 37°C at pH 7 (A); pH 5 (B); pH 3.5 (C); and pH 2 (D). Experiments were conducted at pH 7 in the absence (A) and in the presence of ETDA (1 mmol/L; E). Ferritin degradation was paralleled by the formation of ferritin oligomers at pH 5 and 3.5, respectively (B, C). Ferritin-iron contents are expressed relative to the initial ferritin-iron content of the recombinant bean ferritin solution. <DL, below detection limit.

 
    Pepsin/HCl digestion of ferritin. The simulated gastric digestion of recombinant bean ferritin and red kidney bean extract indicates that iron is likely to be released from ferritin during gastric passage. After in vitro digestion, no iron eluted from the column at retention times typical for ferritin (Fig. 3). Iron was almost quantitatively eluted ~40 min after sample injection in the presence of EDTA. This was observed for both the recombinant bean ferritin and the red kidney bean extract (Fig. 3B,D). In a separate experiment, we found that Fe-EDTA solution applied to the same gel filtration column was also quantitatively recovered 40 min after injection (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3  Size exclusion chromatogram (Superdex 200 column, fraction volume 1 mL) of recombinant bean ferritin and red kidney bean extract before and after in vitro gastric digestion. Recombinant bean ferritin before digestion (A); recombinant bean ferritin after digestion (B); red kidney bean extract before digestion (C); and red kidney bean extract after digestion (D).

 
    Kinetics of ferritin degradation during simulated HCl-pepsin digestion. Both recombinant bean ferritin and native pea ferritin in ground peas was fully degraded within 2 h during a simulated pepsin/HCl digestion (Fig. 4). Similar to the pH stability experiments, the formation of ferritin oligomers was observed. Released iron from ferritin could not be quantitatively detected in these experiments due to the poor solubility of iron at neutral pH. Therefore, EDTA was added in a separate experiment to prevent iron precipitation in the aqueous phase. Boiling and blending released almost 80% of the pea iron (Table 2). The remaining insoluble iron was solubilized and released from the pea matrix during in vitro digestion (Table 2). Our experiments show that any ferritin not affected by cooking can be expected to be degraded later during gastric passage.


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4  Kinetics of ferritin degradation during in vitro digestion. Recombinant bean ferritin (A); native pea ferritin in ground dry peas (B). The pH of the digest was adjusted stepwise to simulate conditions in the human stomach after food intake (pH 5, 3.5, 2.5, and 2.0, respectively). Ferritin degradation was paralleled by the formation of ferritin oligomers. Ferritin-iron contents are expressed relative to the initial ferritin-iron content of the recombinant bean ferritin solution, relative to total pea iron, respectively. <DL, below detection limit.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Iron released from dry peas (cooked and uncooked) over the course of a simulated gastric pepsin/HCl digestion12

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We designed this study to help clarify the contradictory findings on ferritin-iron bioavailability (1315,1720). Previous studies have measured iron absorption from in vivo or in vitro labeled ferritin. Contradictory findings from these human iron-absorption studies are possibly related to the complexity of conducting such studies and the challenge of isotopically labeling iron in the ferritin molecule. Recently it was suggested that ferritin-iron is protected from iron absorption inhibitors through the protein hull, possibly leading to increased iron absorption (41). In this study, we have addressed the fundamental question of ferritin stability during cooking and gastric passage. Monitoring changes of the ferritin molecule and its iron core during these processes could contribute to a better understanding of how ferritin-iron is absorbed. If ferritin does not survive meal preparation and gastric digestion to a significant extent, any ferritin-specific absorption pathway would contribute little to human iron nutrition.

Our studies show that native legume ferritin is altered to a large extent during cooking. We measured ferritin-iron contents in different legumes before cooking (Table 1) and found ferritin-iron as a percentage of total iron to vary from 42% in dry peas to 18% in soybeans (Table 1). In a previous study where Mössbauer spectrometry was employed for iron speciation, 90% of soybean seed iron was found in a trivalent state and showed an isomer shift and quadrupole splitting resembling ferritin-iron (42). This led to the conclusion that over 90% of soybean iron occurs in the form of ferritin-iron (41). The value we measured for soybeans corresponds better with another study, which reported that soluble ferritin-iron is 15% of the total iron in soybeans, as specifically measured by immunoprecipitation (16). After cooking, however, no ferritin-iron could be detected in any of the legumes tested. There are several possible explanations for these findings: 1) the release of iron in an ionized form from ferritin during cooking; 2) ferritin becoming insoluble during cooking and thereby trapping ferritin-bound iron in the shell; and 3) the dissociation of the protein shell of the ferritin molecule and liberation of the mineralized core that would be insoluble at the pH of the food matrix. Reductive food components, such as ascorbic acid or polyphenols, which are both found in legumes, have been shown to liberate iron from ferritin in vitro (43,44), and we speculate that this may account for iron leakage during food preparation. Alternatively, denaturation of the ferritin protein hull is also likely. Temperatures during boiling exceeded denaturation temperatures of ferritin, which were reported to be in the range of 77–93°C (45).

Whereas cooking reduced the amount of total soluble iron, the soluble iron remaining was much higher when legumes and isolated ferritin were cooked in the presence of EDTA (Table 1). EDTA serves as a chelating agent and prevents precipitation of solubilized iron at neutral pH after its release from the food matrix and/or the ferritin molecule. At the same time, EDTA per se had no detectable effect on ferritin stability (Fig. 2E). Similar results were obtained when experiments were conducted with purified recombinant bean ferritin, although detectable amounts of intact ferritin were identified after cooking (Table 1). We cannot rule out that ferritin stability during cooking is higher in other plant foods due to different methods of food preparation or different composition. Should any ferritin survive cooking unaltered, it would still be unlikely that significant amounts of intact ferritin would arrive in the duodenum because our results indicate that ferritin-iron is released during gastric digestion (Figs. 2–4). We assume that the ferritin shell is dissociated by the acidic conditions in the stomach and that the mineral core is dissolved in the gastric contents.

The lack of detection of ferritin-iron and concurrent detection of EDTA-bound iron after gastric digestion at pH 2 is an indication for the release and/or dissolution of ferritin-iron (Fig. 3B,D). EDTA itself did not have any influence on ferritin-iron solubilization in this experiment because it was only added after digestion to keep dissolved iron in solution at neutral pH. In experiments that were conducted without the subsequent addition of EDTA, any released or dissolved iron was probably rendered insoluble at pH 7 (Figs. 2, 4A). This was not the case in the digestion of dried peas, which resulted in >30% of nonferritin-bound iron remaining soluble at pH 7 (Fig. 4B) and could be due to soluble iron-binding pea components. The observed ferritin-oligomers (Fig. 2) seem to be minor intermediate products formed during digestion. It is unlikely that these play a special role for iron uptake because they are undetectable by the end of gastric digestion. Our results (Figs. 2–4) are in agreement with 2 recent studies, which showed that after in vitro digestion at pH 2, the ferritin protein hull was fully dissociated or degraded (46,47). In the study by Kalgaonkar and Lönnerdal (47), this effect was less pronounced when gastric digestion was simulated at pH 4 instead of pH 2. This result gives rise to the hypothesis that some ferritin may leak into the intestine in intact form at an early stage of gastric digestion. It can be argued, however, that these experiments were conducted with uncooked, intact ferritin. Ferritin-iron is mostly present in foods such as legumes that usually undergo long and harsh cooking procedures. As shown by our experiments, these conditions have a strong effect on ferritin integrity. Assuming that part of ferritin is altered to an insoluble form during cooking, there are indications that such ferritin-iron is also dissolved in the gastric juice: 20–30% of insoluble iron after cooking, possibly insoluble ferritin-iron, was solubilized by gastric digestion over 2 h (Table 2). Ferritin was also degraded during digestion when it was not previously extracted but embedded in the plant matrix, where it may be protected by plant cell components and plastids (Fig. 4B; Table 2). These findings imply that a possible ferritin-specific uptake mechanism, as has been proposed earlier (14,15,41), has a smaller impact on iron absorption than previously assumed.

The view that ferritin could protect its iron core from absorption inhibitors (41) was primarily based on the results of 2 iron absorption studies where intrinsically labeled soybeans were used (13,48). Those studies reported relatively high fractional absorption (20% and 27%, respectively) despite the presence of phytic acid in the test meals. When considering early and recent intrinsic/extrinsic tag studies (4851), however, it seems unlikely that ferritin-iron is better absorbed than other nonheme iron. In these studies, iron in cereals and legumes was labeled intrinsically by adding a radioiron tag during growth, presumably also labeling ferritin-iron intrinsically. An extrinsic radioiron tag in the form of FeCl3 was added shortly before test meal administration. In all studies, the efficiency of intrinsic tag absorption from the labeled legume-based meals was similar to the extrinsic tag absorption. Even in the study of Sayers et al. (48), which showed high fractional iron absorption, the extrinsic tag of FeCl3 was as well absorbed as the intrinsically labeled soybean iron (including ferritin-iron). An evaluation of the data by Murray-Kolb et al. (13) in this context is difficult because no extrinsic tag was given for comparison. Therefore, these experiments do not provide any indication that ferritin-iron is absorbed to a different degree than other nonheme iron. This is also in line with 2 recent human studies that showed that iron from in vitro labeled plant and animal ferritin is as equally well absorbed as iron from ferrous sulfate (14,15). Furthermore, Caco-2 cell studies have demonstrated that after in vitro digestion, uptake of ferritin-iron was influenced by dietary factors such as phytic acid, tannic acid, calcium, and ascorbic acid (46,47). Another Caco-2 cell study has shown that iron absorption from common beans is influenced by the polyphenol content of the beans (52), which likewise does not indicate that the ferritin-iron in the beans is protected from absorption inhibitors.

In conclusion, the results from our study show that most plant ferritin is altered during cooking, either by release of iron or denaturation of the protein hull. Any remaining ferritin-iron, either in soluble form as intact ferritin, as insoluble ferritin after denaturation, or as the naked mineral core, is then released and dissolved in a pH-dependent manner during gastric digestion. Such released and dissolved iron would be taken up by the divalent metal transporter-1 pathway for nonheme iron and would display similar susceptibility to iron absorption enhancers and inhibitors. At the present stage, we cannot exclude the possibility that small amounts of ferritin may survive cooking and gastric passage intact. However, our experiments indicate that these amounts can be safely expected to be very small and are therefore unlikely to change overall absorption efficiency of plant iron.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Stefan Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann and Christophe Zeder for their advice.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by ETH grant TH-35/03-3. Back

2 Author disclosures: M. Hoppler, A. Schönbächler, L. Meile, R. F. Hurrell, and T. Walczyk, no conflicts of interest. Back

3 Supplemental Figure 1 is available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. Back

Manuscript received 26 October 2007. Initial review completed 27 November 2007. Revision accepted 24 February 2008.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. WHO/FAO. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. Geneva; 2006.

2. Haas JD, Brownlie T. Iron deficiency and reduced work capacity: A critical review of the research to determine a causal relationship. J Nutr. 2001;131:676S–88S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Beard JL. Iron biology in immune function, muscle metabolism and neuronal functioning. J Nutr. 2001;131:568S–79S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, Lozoff B, Wasserman GA, Pollitt E, Carter JA. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:145–57.[Medline]

5. Gibson RS. Technological approaches to combatting iron deficiency. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:S25–7.

6. Bouis H. Enrichment of food staples through plant breeding: a new strategy for fighting micronutrient malnutrition. Nutr Rev. 1996;54:131–7.[Medline]

7. Nestel P, Bouis HE, Meenakshi JV, Pfeiffer W. Biofortification of staple food crops. J Nutr. 2006;136:1064–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Bouis HE. The potential of genetically modified food crops to improve human nutrition in developing countries. J Dev Stud. 2007;43:79–96.

9. Theil EC, Burton JW, Beard JL. A sustainable solution for dietary iron deficiency through plant biotechnology and breeding to increase seed ferritin control. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:S28–31.

10. Drakakaki G, Marcel S, Glahn RP, Lund EK, Pariagh S, Fischer R, Christou P, Stoger E. Endosperm-specific co-expression of recombinant soybean ferritin and Aspergillus phytase in maize results in significant increases in the levels of bioavailable iron. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59:869–80.[Medline]

11. Goto F, Yoshihara T, Shigemoto N, Toki S, Takaiwa F. Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:282–6.[Medline]

12. Lucca P, Hurrell R, Potrykus I. Genetic engineering approaches to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102:392–7.

13. Murray-Kolb LE, Welch R, Theil EC, Beard JL. Women with low iron stores absorb iron from soybeans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:180–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Lonnerdal B, Bryant A, Liu X, Theil EC. Iron absorption from soybean ferritin in nonanemic women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:103–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Davila-Hicks P, Theil EC, Lonnerdal B. Iron in ferritin or in salts (ferrous sulfate) is equally bioavailable in nonanemic women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:936–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Beard JL, Burton JW, Theil EC. Purified ferritin and soybean meal can be sources of iron for treating iron deficiency in rats. J Nutr. 1996;126:154–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Skikne B, Fonzo D, Lynch SR, Cook JD. Bovine ferritin iron bioavailability in man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1997;27:228–33.[Medline]

18. Martinez-Torres C, Leets I, Taylor P, Ramirez J, del Valle Camacho M, Layrisse M. Heme, ferritin and vegetable iron absorption in humans from meals denatured of heme iron during the cooking of beef. J Nutr. 1986;116:1720–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Derman DP, Bothwell TH, Torrance JD, Macphail AP, Bezwoda WR, Charlton RW, Mayet FG. Iron absorption from ferritin and ferric hydroxide. Scand J Haematol. 1982;29:18–24.[Medline]

20. Layrisse M, Martinez-Torres C, Renzy M, Leets I. Ferritin iron absorption in man. Blood. 1975;45:689–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Lynch SR, Beard JL, Dassenko SA, Cook JD. Iron-absorption from legumes in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;40:42–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Gillooly M, Bothwell TH, Torrance JD, Macphail AP, Derman DP, Bezwoda WR, Mills W, Charlton RW, Mayet F. The effects of organic-acids, phytates and polyphenols on the absorption of iron from vegetables. Br J Nutr. 1983;49:331–42.[Medline]

23. Hurrell RF, Juillerat MA, Reddy MB, Lynch SR, Dassenko SA, Cook JD. Soy protein, phytate, and iron-absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:573–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Hoppler M, Meile L, Walczyk T. Biosynthesis, isolation and characterization of 57Fe-enriched Phaseolus vulgaris ferritin after heterologous expression in Escherichia coli. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390:53–9.[Medline]

25. Spence MJ, Henzl MT, Lammers PJ. The structure of a Phaseolus-vulgaris cDNA-encoding the iron storage protein ferritin. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;17:499–504.[Medline]

26. Bradford MM. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.[Medline]

27. Miller DD, Schricker BR, Rasmussen RR, Vancampen D. An in vitro method for estimation of iron availability from meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:2248–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Hoebler C, Lecannu G, Belleville C, Devaux MF, Popineau Y, Barry JL. Development of an in vitro system simulating bucco-gastric digestion to assess the physical and chemical changes of food. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2002;53:389–402.[Medline]

29. Simonian HP, Vo L, Doma S, Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Regional postprandial differences in pH within the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:2276–85.[Medline]

30. Russell TL, Berardi RR, Barnett JL, Dermentzoglou LC, Jarvenpaa KM, Schmaltz SP, Dressman JB. Upper gastrointestinal pH in 79 healthy, elderly, North American men and women. Pharm Res. 1993;10:187–96.[Medline]

31. Laulhere JP, Lescure AM, Briat JF. Purification and characterization of ferritins from maize, pea, and soybean seeds - distribution in various pea organs. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:10289–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Sczekan SR, Joshi JG. Isolation and characterization of ferritin from soybeans (glycine-max). J Biol Chem. 1987;262:13780–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Vandermark F, Vandenbriel W. Purification and partial characterization of ferritin from normal and iron-loaded leaves of Phaseolus-vulgaris. Plant Sci. 1985;39:55–60.

34. Barcelo F, Arean CO, Moore GR. Isolation and preliminary characterization of ferritin from clover seeds (Trifolium-subterraneum l cv clare). Biometals. 1995;8:47–52.

35. Wade VJ, Treffry A, Laulhere JP, Bauminger ER, Cleton MI, Mann S, Briat JF, Harrison PM. Structure and composition of ferritin cores from pea seed (Pisum-sativum). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1161:91–6.[Medline]

36. Petsev DN, Thomas BR, Yau ST, Vekilov PG. Interactions and aggregation of apoferritin molecules in solution: effects of added electrolytes. Biophys J. 2000;78:2060–9.[Medline]

37. Thomas BR, Carter D, Rosenberger F. Effect of microheterogeneity on horse spleen apoferritin crystallization. J Cryst Growth. 1998;187:499–510.

38. Hyde BB, Hodge AJ, Kahn A, Birnstiel ML. Studies on phytoferritin. 1. Identification and localization. J Ultrastruct Res. 1963;9:248–58.

39. Crichton RR, Ponceortiz Y, Koch MHJ, Parfait R, Stuhrmann HB. Isolation and characterization of phytoferritin from pea. Biochem J. 1978;171:349–56.[Medline]

40. Oh SH, Cho SW, Kwon TH, Yang MS. Purification and characterization of phytoferritin. J Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;29:540–4.

41. Theil EC. Iron, ferritin, and nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:327–43.[Medline]

42. Ambe S, Ambe F, Nozaki T. Mossbauer study of iron in soybean seeds. J Agric Food Chem. 1987;35:292–6.

43. Boyer RF, Clark HM, Laroche AP. Reduction and release of ferritin iron by plant phenolics. J Inorg Biochem. 1988;32:171–81.[Medline]

44. Hynes MJ, Coinceanainn MO. Investigation of the release of iron from ferritin by naturally occurring antioxidants. J Inorg Biochem. 2002;90:18–21.[Medline]

45. Stefanini S, Cavallo S, Wang CQ, Tataseo P, Vecchini P, Giartosio A, Chiancone E. Thermal stability of horse spleen apoferritin and human recombinant H apoferritin. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;325:58–64.[Medline]

46. Bejjani S, Pullakhandam R, Punjal R, Nair KM. Gastric digestion of pea ferritin and modulation of its iron bioavailability by ascorbic and phytic acids in Caco-2 cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2083–8.[Medline]

47. Kalgaonkar S, Lonnerdal B. Effects of dietary factors on iron uptake from ferritin by Caco-2 cells. J Nutr Biochem. 2008;19:33–9.[Medline]

48. Sayers MH, Lynch SR, Jacobs P, Charlton RW, Bothwell TH, Walker RB, Mayet F. Effects of ascorbic-acid supplementation on absorption of iron in maize, wheat and soya. Br J Haematol. 1973;24:209–18.[Medline]

49. Björn-Rasmussen E, Hallberg L, Walker RB. Food iron-absorption in man. 2. Isotopic-exchange of iron between labeled foods and between a food and an iron salt. Am J Clin Nutr. 1973;26:1311–9.[Abstract]

50. Cook JD, Finch CA, Walker R, Martinez C, Layrisse M, Monsen E. Food iron-absorption measured by an extrinsic tag. J Clin Invest. 1972;51:805–15.[Medline]

51. Donangelo CM, Woodhouse LR, King SM, Toffolo G, Shames DM, Viteri FE, Cheng Z, Welch RM, King JC. Iron and zinc absorption from two bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) genotypes in young women. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:5137–43.[Medline]

52. Hu Y, Cheng Z, Heller LI, Krasnoff SB, Glahn RP, Welch RM. Kaempferol in red and pinto bean seed (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) coats inhibits iron bioavailability using an in vitro digestion/human caco-2 cell model. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:9254–61.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supporting Material
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoppler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walczyk, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoppler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walczyk, T.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition