QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Online Supporting Material Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smeets, A. J. Articles by Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smeets, A. J. Articles by Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S.

---

Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Energy Expenditure, Satiety, and Plasma Ghrelin, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, and Peptide Tyrosine-Tyrosine Concentrations following a Single High-Protein Lunch^1,2

³ Maastricht University, Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands; ⁴ Top Institute Food and Nutrition, 6700 AN, Wageningen, The Netherlands; and ⁵ Matforsk AS, The Norwegian Food Research Institute, N-1430 Ås, Norway

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: astrid.smeets{at}hb.unimaas.nl.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

 
High-protein (HP) foods are more satiating and have a higher thermogenic effect than normal protein foods over the short-term as well as the long-term. We hypothesized that acute effects of higher protein intake on satiety may be related to acute metabolic and hormonal responses. The study was a single-blind, randomized, crossover design. Subjects underwent 2 indirect calorimetry tests for measurement of energy expenditure (EE) and substrate oxidation. After a standard subject-specific breakfast, subjects received 1 of 2 randomly assigned treatments: an appropriate protein (AP) lunch (10% energy (E) protein, 60%E carbohydrate, 30%E fat), or a HP lunch (25%E protein, 45%E carbohydrate, 30%E fat). The increase in postlunch EE tended to be greater after the HP lunch (0.85 ± 0.32 kJ/min) than after the AP lunch (0.73 ± 0.22 kJ/min) (P = 0.07). The respiratory quotient did not differ between the HP (0.84 ± 0.04) and the AP (0.86 ± 0.04) treatments. Satiety visual analogue scales (VAS) scores were significantly higher 30 and 120 min after the HP lunch than after the AP lunch. The area under the curve of the VAS score for satiety was higher after the HP lunch (263 ± 61 mm/h) than after the AP lunch (AP 236 ± 76 mm/h) (P < 0.02). Effects of the meals on satiety and diet-induced thermogenesis did not occur simultaneously with changes in plasma ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1, and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine concentrations. A single HP lunch, therefore, does not exert its acute effect on satiety through increased concentrations of satiety-related hormones. Other factors, which may explain the HP effect on satiety, may be metabolites or amino acids.

	Introduction

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

In a recent study, Lejeune et al. (6) showed that a HP diet, compared with an adequate-protein diet, when consumed in energy balance over 4 d, increased 24-h satiety, thermogenesis, sleeping metabolic rate, protein balance, and fat oxidation. In the HP condition, satiety was related to protein intake and incidentally to plasma ghrelin and GLP-1 concentrations. It has not been determined whether these effects of a HP diet occur with exposure to 1 meal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the acute effects of a HP lunch on energy expenditure (EE), diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), substrate oxidation, satiety related hormones (GLP-1, ghrelin, and PYY), and satiety. We hypothesized that a single HP meal compared with a single appropriate-protein (AP) meal may increase satiety, DIT, plasma GLP-1 and PYY concentrations, and fat oxidation, and decrease plasma ghrelin concentrations and respiratory quotient (RQ).

	Subjects and Methods

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

 
    Subjects. Thirty healthy subjects (19 women and 11 men) aged 18–60 y with a BMI of 20–30 kg/m² were recruited by advertisements in local newspapers and on notice boards at Maastricht University. All subjects underwent a medical screening and all were in good health, nonsmokers, not using medication, and at most moderate alcohol users. Eating behavior was assessed using a validated Dutch translation of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire. Cognitive restrained and unrestrained eating behavior (factor 1), emotional eating and disinhibition (factor 2), and the subjective feeling of hunger (factor 3) were scored (26). The baseline characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The Medical Ethics Committee of the Academic Hospital in Maastricht approved the study.

    EE and substrate oxidation. On the test days, baseline and postlunch EE and substrate oxidation were measured with an open-circuit, ventilated-hood system with the subjects lying supine (28). Gas analysis was performed by a paramagnetic O₂ analyzer (OmniCal type 1155B; Crowborough) and an infrared CO₂ analyzer (OmniCal type 1520/1507). EE was calculated using Brouwer's formula (29). The RQ was calculated as CO₂ produced/O₂ consumed. The nonprotein RQ was calculated using the formula: [VCO₂ (L) – 4.8 x N(g)/VO₂ (L) – 6 x N(g)], where V stands for volume and N stands for nitrogen. Carbohydrate, fat, and protein oxidation were calculated from the measurements of oxygen consumption, CO₂ production, and urinary nitrogen excretion by using the formula of Brouwer (29). Urine samples were collected from the first void after the start of the test day (1100) until the last void on the test day (1600). Subjects voided their bladder before the start of the test day (before 1100) Samples were collected in containers with 10 mL H₂SO₄ to prevent nitrogen loss through evaporation. Volume and nitrogen concentration were measured, the latter with a nitrogen analyzer (CHN-O-Rapid; Heraeus).

    Blood sampling. One hour before the lunch was served (1100), a polytetrafluoroethylene catheter was placed in the antecubital vein for blood sampling. During each test day, we took 1 blood sample just before the lunch (at 0 min) and 4 blood samples after lunch (at 45, 60, 120, and 180 min) for measurement of plasma ghrelin, GLP-1, and PYY concentrations. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA to prevent clotting. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation (4°C, 1000 x g; 10 min) and stored at –80°C until analyzed. We measured plasma concentrations of active ghrelin using radioimmunoassay (Linco Research) and analyzed plasma active GLP-1 samples by enzyme-linked immunoradiometric assay (EGLP- 35K; Linco Research). PYY was measured with a specific and sensitive radioimmunoassay, which measures both the full length (PYY1–36) and the fragment (PYY3–36) (Linco Research).

    Appetite profile. We measured appetite profile using anchored 100-mm visual analogue scales (VAS). During each test day, questionnaires were completed at several time points before and after the lunch. The questions were, "How hungry are you?" and "How satiated are you?" and were anchored by "not at all" and "very."

    Body composition. Body composition was measured using the deuterium dilution technique. ²H₂O dilution was used to measure total body water (TBW). Deuterium was measured in the urine samples with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG-Isogas Aqua Sira; VG Isogas). We obtained TBW by dividing the measured deuterium dilution space by 1.04. Fat-free mass was calculated by dividing TBW by the hydration factor 0.73. Fat mass was determined as body weight – fat-free mass (30–32).

    Statistical analysis. Data are presented as means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. We used repeated measures ANOVA to compare the HP and AP data. Factorial ANOVA was used to analyze possible differences between gender and BMI groups. Post hoc comparisons were made with the Fisher's protected least significant difference test. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the relations between selected variables and Pearson correlations are reported. All statistical tests were performed using Statview SE Graphics software (version 4.5; Abacus Concepts).

	Results

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

 
    EE and substrate oxidation. Baseline EE did not differ before the HP (4.80 ± 0.71 kJ/min) and AP (4.79 ± 0.81 kJ/min) lunches. The increase in postlunch EE tended to be greater after the HP lunch (0.85 ± 0.32 kJ/min) than after the AP lunch (0.73 ± 0.22 kJ/min) (P = 0.07). Total postlunch EE above baseline EE over a period of 210 min tended to be greater after the HP lunch (177.60 ± 67.30 kJ) than after the AP lunch (153.50 ± 46.40 kJ) (P = 0.07). Total postlunch EE above baseline EE > 210 min as percentage of the energy content of the lunch tended to be greater after the HP lunch (4.93 ± 1.56%) than after the AP lunch (4.32 ± 1.20%) (P = 0.1).

The RQ did not differ between the HP (0.84 ± 0.04) and the AP (0.86 ± 0.04) treatments and the nonprotein RQ also did not differ between the HP (0.85 ± 0.05) and the AP (0.87 ± 0.05) treatments. Substrate oxidation did not differ between the HP condition (protein oxidation: 17.4 ± 5.9 g; carbohydrate oxidation: 34.2 ± 11.5 g; fat oxidation: 15.8 ± 6.9 g) and the AP condition (protein oxidation: 16.9 ± 6.2 g; carbohydrate oxidation: 37.3 ± 12.4 g; fat oxidation: 13.2 ± 6.4 g).

    Plasma hormones. The plasma hormone concentrations did not differ between the 2 treatments at baseline before the lunches were consumed. Changes in hormone concentrations in response to the lunches are expressed as the change from baseline. Plasma GLP-1 responses were lower 15 min after the HP lunch than after the AP lunch (P < 0.01; Fig. 1A). Plasma active ghrelin responses to the HP and AP lunches did not differ at any of the time points measured (Fig. 1B). The plasma active ghrelin response 15 min after the AP lunch differed between men [–35.4 ± 36.8 pg/mL (–10.6 ± 11.1 pmol/L)] and women [6.9 ± 55.5 pg/mL (2.1 ± 16.7 pmol/L); P < 0.05]. Plasma PYY responses to the HP and AP lunches did not differ at any of the time points measured (Fig. 1C). The plasma PYY response 15 min after the HP lunch differed between subjects with a BMI > 25 kg/m² [–7.9 ± 16.5 pg/mL (–1.8 ± 3.8 pmol/L)] and subjects with a BMI < 25 kg/m² [12.8 ± 22.8 pg/mL (3.0 ± 5.3 pmol/L); P < 0.05].

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1  Changes in plasma GLP-1 (A), active ghrelin (B), and PYY (C) concentrations in subjects after they consumed the HP and AP lunches. Values are means ± SEM, n = 30. *Different between HP and AP at that time, P < 0.05.

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2  Satiety ratings measured with the use of an anchored 100-mm VAS of subjects after they consumed the HP and AP lunches. Values are means ± SEM, n = 30. *Different between HP and AP at that time, P < 0.05.

	Discussion

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

Most studies that observed effects on satiety used a higher percentage of energy from protein, e.g. 43–68%, in the HP meal compared with our study (2,9–11,33–36). Our study and that of Hill and Blundell (34) showed that when using mixed meals, satiety is already increased at 25% energy from protein compared with satiety at 10% of energy from protein. These findings are very relevant to the human diet, because 25% of energy from protein can easily be achieved using typically consumed foods. Barkeling et al. (36) asked subjects consume 43% of energy from protein using typically consumed foods in a mixed HP meal. This HP meal increased satiety compared with the mixed meal with 10% of energy from protein but also caused taste aversion for HP foods. The development of taste aversion may contribute more to satiation (terminating a meal) rather than to satiety (postponing the next meal). In this study, however, taste aversion cannot play a role, because the sausages used to manipulate the protein content of the treatment meals were exactly the same in taste, texture, and appearance. Here, the short-term effect of the single HP meal (after 30 min) on satiety may reflect satiation rather than satiety, because the subjects were aware that it was single fixed meal they had to finish and after which they would not receive any other foods. Strong feelings of satiety over a short period after ingestion of a meal may be interpreted as the wish to terminate the eating episode rather than the wish to postpone the next eating episode.

EE after the HP lunch tended to be higher than after the AP lunch. The effect of protein on 24-h thermogenesis has frequently been observed by others (2,4–7,37). The increased thermogenesis over 24 h is thought to be 1 of the mechanisms that increases feelings of satiety after a HP meal. The relationship between DIT and satiety, however, reflects a condition of a HP diet that the subjects experience (6) or appears after consuming extremely high contents of protein in the meal (2). For instance, Crovetti et al. (2) observed a correlation between DIT and fullness ratings over 7 h (HP meal contained 68% energy from protein). Lejeune et al. (6) did observe a relationship between DIT and satiety with 30% energy from protein in a respiration chamber study lasting 36 h. In these studies, DIT was measured over a longer period compared with our study, which may have contributed to a stronger relationship between appetite ratings and DIT as well.

Plasma ghrelin, GLP-1, and PYY did not differ in our study. In a recent study, Lejeune et al. (6) observed higher plasma GLP-1 responses following a HP dinner than after a AP dinner. The plasma GLP-1 response after the HP lunch in that study was, however, not different from the plasma GLP-1 response after the AP lunch. The exchange of percentage of energy from carbohydrate for protein in both the Lejeune study (6) and our study complicates the interpretation of the plasma GLP-1 responses. A larger availability of carbohydrates may have lead to increased contact of carbohydrates with the small intestine, which increases plasma GLP-1 responses to mixed meals (38). Although GLP-1 is often considered to be a satiety hormone, in our study, plasma GLP-1 responses were not correlated to satiety. This lack of relationship between the increased plasma concentrations of GLP-1 and satiety has been observed in several other studies, which suggests that the effect of peripheral GLP-1 on satiety may be influenced by the central sensitivity for GLP-1 or interactions with other hormones (19,38–40). In previous studies, effects of protein on plasma ghrelin responses have been conflicting (6,41–43). The amount of carbohydrate, through glucose and insulin, and the food form, through gastric emptying, may influence plasma ghrelin responses to a meal. In this study, plasma ghrelin concentrations did not contribute to the observed effects of the HP lunch on satiety. This is consistent with the results of Lejeune et al. (6), who observed no differences in plasma ghrelin responses following HP meals throughout the day compared with AP meals.

The HP and AP lunched did not affect plasma PYY responses. Plasma PYY responses are influenced by energy intake and meal composition. In a recent study, Batterham et al. (44) observed significantly higher plasma PYY responses to a HP meal in both lean and obese subjects. In that study, the size of the meals and the amount of protein were much larger than in our study. The size of the meals used in our study, which ranged from 2.8 to 4.5 MJ (35% of subject specific daily energy needs), may have been too small to evoke an acute response in plasma PYY in the postprandial state. The range of the measured plasma hormone responses was quite large at some time points. This variability in responses was due to, among other things, different responses between men and women (45) and between subjects who were normal weight or overweight according to their BMI (46). Studying a heterogeneous group of subjects, however, makes the outcomes more applicable to the general population.

Apart from the hormones measured in this study, other hormones, which have been shown to be induced by protein ingestion, such as cholecystokinin, insulin, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide, may have contributed to the satiating effect of the HP meal (47–49).

Our results should be interpreted with caution, because this study was conducted at lunch in the postprandial state. Most studies of single HP meals have been conducted at breakfast in subjects in the postabsorptive state, which makes them difficult to compare with this study.

We conclude that a single HP meal of 25% of energy from protein rather than 10% of energy from protein, where protein was exchanged with carbohydrates and contained the same foods, has a greater effect on satiety. The effects of a single HP meal in the postprandial state are not mediated by increased plasma GLP-1 or PYY concentrations and decreased plasma ghrelin concentration. Over the longer term (meals or days), plasma GLP-1, PYY, and ghrelin responses most probably augment and, as a result, may contribute to the increased satiety observed for HP foods and diets. Obviously, there is a marked difference between the satiety effect due to a continuous HP diet and an acute HP lunch. The short-term effect of the single HP meal on satiety in this study may reflect satiation rather than satiety. Other factors, which may explain the HP effect on satiety, may be metabolites or amino acids. In a recent study, Veldhorst et al. (50) showed that the satiating effect of a HP breakfast was positively related to plasma concentrations of specific amino acids up to 4 h. In future studies, protein metabolites, plasma amino acids, and central effects of satiety-related hormones may give more insight into the acute effects of HP meals on satiety.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Janna Bitnes at Matforsk for providing us with the sausages and Helene Reinbach, Tímea Gelencser, Maartje Spetter, Rick Hursel, Tine Horsten, and Lizette den Hollander for their assistance.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ Supported by DiOGenes (contract no. FP6-513946).

² Author disclosures: A. J. Smeets, S. Soenen, N. D. Luscombe-Marsh, Ø. Ueland, and M. S. Westerterp-Plantenga, no conflicts of interest.

⁶ Abbreviations used: AP, appropriate protein; DIT, diet-induced thermogenesis; E, energy; EE, energy expenditure; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HP, high protein; PYY, peptide tyrosine-tyrosine; RQ, respiratory quotient; TBW, total body water; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Manuscript received 18 October 2007. Initial review completed 26 November 2007. Revision accepted 17 January 2008.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion LITERATURE CITED

 

1. Bensaid A, Tome D, Gietzen D, Even P, Morens C, Gausseres N, Fromentin G. Protein is more potent than carbohydrate for reducing appetite in rats. Physiol Behav. 2002;75:577–82.[Medline]

2. Crovetti R, Porrini M, Santangelo A, Testolin G. The influence of thermic effect of food on satiety. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:482–8.[Medline]

3. Johnstone AM, Stubbs RJ, Harbron CG. Effect of overfeeding macronutrients on day-to-day food intake in man. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:418–30.[Medline]

4. Karst H, Steiniger J, Noack R, Steglich HD. Diet-induced thermogenesis in man: thermic effects of single proteins, carbohydrates and fats depending on their energy amount. Ann Nutr Metab. 1984;28:245–52.[Medline]

5. LeBlanc J, Diamond P, Nadeau A. Thermogenic and hormonal responses to palatable protein and carbohydrate rich food. Horm Metab Res. 1991;23:336–40.[Medline]

6. Lejeune MP, Westerterp KR, Adam TC, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations, 24-h satiety, and energy and substrate metabolism during a high-protein diet and measured in a respiration chamber. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:89–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Luscombe ND, Clifton PM, Noakes M, Farnsworth E, Wittert G. Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on weight loss and energy expenditure after weight stabilization in hyperinsulinemic subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:582–90.[Medline]

8. Mikkelsen PB, Toubro S, Astrup A. Effect of fat-reduced diets on 24-h energy expenditure: comparisons between animal protein, vegetable protein, and carbohydrate. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:1135–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Poppitt SD, McCormack D, Buffenstein R. Short-term effects of macronutrient preloads on appetite and energy intake in lean women. Physiol Behav. 1998;64:279–85.[Medline]

10. Porrini M, Crovetti R, Testolin G, Silva S. Evaluation of satiety sensations and food intake after different preloads. Appetite. 1995;25:17–30.[Medline]

11. Stubbs RJ, van Wyk MC, Johnstone AM, Harbron CG. Breakfasts high in protein, fat or carbohydrate: effect on within-day appetite and energy balance. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:409–17.[Medline]

12. Weigle DS, Breen PA, Matthys CC, Callahan HS, Meeuws KE, Burden VR, Purnell JQ. A high-protein diet induces sustained reductions in appetite, ad libitum caloric intake, and body weight despite compensatory changes in diurnal plasma leptin and ghrelin concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:41–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Rolland V, Wilson SA, Westerterp KR. Satiety related to 24 h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53:495–502.[Medline]

14. Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature. 2001;409:194–8.[Medline]

15. Wren AM, Seal LJ, Cohen MA, Brynes AE, Frost GS, Murphy KG, Dhillo WS, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR. Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Cuntz U, Fruhauf E, Wawarta R, Tschop M, Folwaczny C, Riepl R, Lehnert P, Fichter M, Otto B. A role for the novel weight-regulating hormone ghrelin in anorexia nervosa. Am Clin Lab. 2002;21:22–3.[Medline]

17. Cummings DE, Purnell JQ, Frayo RS, Schmidova K, Wisse BE, Weigle DS. A preprandial rise in plasma ghrelin levels suggests a role in meal initiation in humans. Diabetes. 2001;50:1714–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Shiiya T, Nakazato M, Mizuta M, Date Y, Mondal MS, Tanaka M, Nozoe S, Hosoda H, Kangawa K, et al. Plasma ghrelin levels in lean and obese humans and the effect of glucose on ghrelin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:240–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Adam TC, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Nutrient-stimulated GLP-1 release in normal-weight men and women. Horm Metab Res. 2005;37:111–7.[Medline]

20. Holst JJ. Glucagonlike peptide 1: a newly discovered gastrointestinal hormone. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1848–55.[Medline]

21. Naslund E, Barkeling B, King N, Gutniak M, Blundell JE, Holst JJ, Rossner S, Hellstrom PM. Energy intake and appetite are suppressed by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in obese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:304–11.[Medline]

22. Flint A, Raben A, Ersboll AK, Holst JJ, Astrup A. The effect of physiological levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 on appetite, gastric emptying, energy and substrate metabolism in obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:781–92.[Medline]

23. Adrian TE, Long RG, Fuessl HS, Bloom SR. Plasma peptide YY (PYY) in dumping syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30:1145–8.[Medline]

24. Batterham RL, Cowley MA, Small CJ, Herzog H, Cohen MA, Dakin CL, Wren AM, Brynes AE, Low MJ, et al. Gut hormone PYY(3–36) physiologically inhibits food intake. Nature. 2002;418:650–4.[Medline]

25. Grandt D, Schimiczek M, Beglinger C, Layer P, Goebell H, Eysselein VE, Reeve JR Jr. Two molecular forms of peptide YY (PYY) are abundant in human blood: characterization of a radioimmunoassay recognizing PYY 1–36 and PYY 3–36. Regul Pept. 1994;51:151–9.[Medline]

26. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71–83.[Medline]

27. Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1918;4:370–3.[Free Full Text]

28. Schoffelen PF, Westerterp KR, Saris WH, Ten Hoor F. A dual-respiration chamber system with automated calibration. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:2064–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Brouwer E. On simple formulae for calculating the heat expenditure and the quantities of carbohydrate and fat oxidized in metabolism of men and animals, from gaseous exchange (oxygen intake and carbonic acid output) and urine-N. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerl. 1957;6:795–802.[Medline]

30. Schoeller DA, van Santen E, Peterson DW, Dietz W, Jaspan J, Klein PD. Total body water measurement in humans with 18O and 2H labeled water. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33:2686–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Westerterp KR, Wouters L. Deuterium dilution as a method for determining total body water: effect of test protocol and sampling time. Br J Nutr. 1994;72:491–7.[Medline]

32. Westerterp KR, Wouters L, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD. The Maastricht protocol for the measurement of body composition and energy expenditure with labeled water. Obes Res. 1995;3 Suppl 1:49–57.[Medline]

33. Westerterp KR, Wilson SA, Rolland V. Diet induced thermogenesis measured over 24h in a respiration chamber: effect of diet composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:287–92.[Medline]

34. Hill AJ, Blundell JE. Macronutrients and satiety: the effects of high carbohydrate and high protein meals on subjective motivation to eat and preferences. Nutr Behav. 1986;3:133–44.

35. Johnson J, Vickers Z. Effects of flavor and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger and subsequent intake. Appetite. 1993;21:25–39.[Medline]

36. Barkeling B, Rossner S, Bjorvell H. Effects of a high-protein meal (meat) and a high-carbohydrate meal (vegetarian) on satiety measured by automated computerized monitoring of subsequent food intake, motivation to eat and food preferences. Int J Obes. 1990;14:743–51.[Medline]

37. Nair KS, Halliday D, Garrow JS. Thermic response to isoenergetic protein, carbohydrate or fat meals in lean and obese subjects. Clin Sci (Lond). 1983;65:307–12.[Medline]

38. Adam TC, Lejeune MP, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Nutrient-stimulated glucagon-like peptide 1 release after body-weight loss and weight maintenance in human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2006;95:160–7.[Medline]

39. Oesch S, Degen L, Beglinger C. Effect of a protein preload on food intake and satiety feelings in response to duodenal fat perfusions in healthy male subjects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289:R1042–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Raben A, Agerholm-Larsen L, Flint A, Holst JJ, Astrup A. Meals with similar energy densities but rich in protein, fat, carbohydrate, or alcohol have different effects on energy expenditure and substrate metabolism but not on appetite and energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:91–100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Blom WA, Lluch A, Stafleu A, Vinoy S, Holst JJ, Schaafsma G, Hendriks HF. Effect of a high-protein breakfast on the postprandial ghrelin response. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:211–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Erdmann J, Lippl F, Schusdziarra V. Differential effect of protein and fat on plasma ghrelin levels in man. Regul Pept. 2003;116:101–7.[Medline]

43. Marzullo P, Caumo A, Savia G, Verti B, Walker GE, Maestrini S, Tagliaferri A, Di Blasio AM, Liuzzi A. Predictors of postabsorptive ghrelin secretion after intake of different macronutrients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4124–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Batterham RL, Heffron H, Kapoor S, Chivers JE, Chandarana K, Herzog H, Le Roux CW, Thomas EL, Bell JD, et al. Critical role for peptide YY in protein-mediated satiation and body-weight regulation. Cell Metab. 2006;4:223–33.[Medline]

45. Makovey J, Naganathan V, Seibel M, Sambrook P. Gender differences in plasma ghrelin and its relations to body composition and bone: an opposite-sex twin study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66:530–7.[Medline]

46. Batterham RL, Bloom SR. The gut hormone peptide YY regulates appetite. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;994:162–8.[Medline]

47. Calbet JA, MacLean DA. Plasma glucagon and insulin responses depend on the rate of appearance of amino acids after ingestion of different protein solutions in humans. J Nutr. 2002;132:2174–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Liddle RA, Goldfine ID, Rosen MS, Taplitz RA, Williams JA. Cholecystokinin bioactivity in human plasma. Molecular forms, responses to feeding, and relationship to gallbladder contraction. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1144–52.[Medline]

49. Wolfe MM, Zhao KB, Glazier KD, Jarboe LA, Tseng CC. Regulation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide release by protein in the rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:G561–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Veldhorst MAB, Nieuwenhuizen AG, Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Westerterp KR, Engelen MPKJ, Brummer RJ, Deutz NEP, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Effects of high or normal casein-, soy-, or whey with or without GMP- protein breakfasts on satiety, ‘satiety’ hormones, and plasma amino acid responses [abstract]. Appetite. 2007;49:336.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Yang, X. Liu, E. L. Ding, M. Xu, S. Wu, L. Liu, X. Sun, and F. B. Hu Impaired Ghrelin Response after High-Fat Meals Is Associated with Decreased Satiety in Obese and Lean Chinese Young Adults J. Nutr., July 1, 2009; 139(7): 1286 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Online Supporting Material Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smeets, A. J. Articles by Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smeets, A. J. Articles by Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S.