|
|
|
|
Activity in Primary Cultures of Human Adipocytes1,2
3 Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170 and 4 Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University, School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27157
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mkmcinto{at}uncg.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
target gene expression. We hypothesized that CLA antagonizes the activity of PPAR
in an isomer-specific manner. 10,12 CLA, but not cis-9, trans-11 (9,11) CLA, suppressed ligand-stimulated activation of a peroxisome proliferator response element-luciferase reporter. This decreased activation of PPAR
by 10,12 CLA was accompanied by an increase in PPAR
and extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)1/2 phosphorylation, followed by decreased PPAR
protein levels. To investigate if 10,12 CLA-mediated delipidation was preventable with a PPAR
ligand (BRL), cultures were treated for 1 wk with 10,12 CLA or 10,12 CLA + BRL and adipogenic gene and protein expression, glucose uptake, and triglyceride (TG) were measured. BRL cosupplementation completely prevented 10,12 CLA suppression of adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein, lipoprotein lipase, and perilipin mRNA levels without preventing reductions in PPAR
or insulin-dependent glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) expression, glucose uptake, or TG. Lastly, we investigated the impact of CLA withdrawal in the absence or presence of BRL for 2 wk. CLA withdrawal did not rescue CLA-mediated reductions in adipogenic gene and protein expression. In contrast, BRL supplementation for 2 wk following CLA withdrawal rescued mRNA levels of PPAR
target genes. However, the levels of PPAR
and GLUT4 protein and TG were only partially rescued by BRL. Collectively, we demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that 10,12 CLA antagonizes ligand-dependent PPAR
activity, possibly via PPAR
phosphorylation by ERK.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, which induces the expression of a host of adipogenic genes such as lipoprotein lipase (LPL), insulin-stimulated glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4),5 perilipin (PLIN), and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (aP2). Mutations of PPAR
in humans are associated with insulin resistance and lipodystrophy (1,2). PPAR
null cells exhibit impaired adipogenesis (3) and dominant negative mutations in PPAR
inhibit adipogenesis (4). Thus, PPAR
activity is essential in adipose tissue for glucose uptake and triglyceride (TG) accumulation.
Regulation of PPAR
occurs through a variety of proposed mechanisms, including covalent modification by phosphorylation, ligand binding, and heterodimerization with the retinoic acid receptor (RXR) (5,6). Phosphorylation of PPAR
by activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been reported to inhibit adipogenesis (7). It has been demonstrated that phosphorylation of Ser-112 of PPAR
2 results in its ubiquination and proteosome degradation (8). Activation of PPAR
by natural (i.e. PUFA) or synthetic ligands such as thiazolidinediones (TZD) initiates heterodimerization with RXR followed by their binding to peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) in the promoters of adipogenic target genes. The TZD are hypoglycemics that activate PPAR
, leading to upregulation of adipogenic genes, thereby enhancing insulin sensitivity. Natural ligands of PPAR
2 such as cis-PUFA or prostaglandins such as PGJ2 (9) have a relatively low affinity for PPAR
compared with TZD. In contrast, SFA and certain trans PUFA such as conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) have been reported to impair insulin sensitivity, possibly by decreasing the expression of PPAR
and many of its downstream target genes (10–13).
CLA consists of dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, including trans-10, cis-12 CLA and cis-9, trans-11 CLA. CLA decreases body fat mass in animals (14) and some humans (15). Our group has demonstrated that trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreases adipogenic gene expression and the TG content of human (pre)adipocytes (10,11). We have also demonstrated that activation of MAPK kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) (11) and nuclear factor
B (NF
B) (16) signaling by trans-10, cis-12 CLA were essential for its suppression of adipogenic gene expression and delipidation in human adipocytes. A number of side effects have been associated with trans-10, cis-12 CLA supplementation in humans, such as insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia (17,18). Dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia are similar characteristics found in humans with mutations in PPAR
. Two recent reports by Belury et al. (19,20) showed that the PPAR
agonist rosiglitazone prevents or attenuates inflammation, lipodystrophy, and insulin resistance in mice fed a crude mixture of CLA isomers containing equal amounts of cis-9, trans-11 CLA and trans-10, cis-12 CLA. However, the isomer-specific mechanism by which CLA suppresses the expression of PPAR
and its target genes in human adipocytes remains to be elucidated. To address this issue, we examined the impact of CLA on PPAR
in the absence and presence of the PPAR
ligand rosiglitazone (BRL).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(sc7273) and polyclonal antibodies for anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (sc20357) and β-actin (sc1616) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-phospho (Thr-202/204) and total ERK antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies. Cy3- and fluorescein-conjugated immunoglobulin G were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch. Fetal bovine serum was purchased from Cambrex/BioWhittaker. BRL was a gift from Glaxo Smith Kline. Isomers of CLA (+98% pure) were purchased from Matreya. The Nucleofector and Dual Glo luciferase (luc) kits were obtained from Amaxa and Promega, respectively. All other reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical unless otherwise stated.
Culturing of human primary adipocytes.
Abdominal white adipose tissue was obtained from nondiabetic females between the ages of 20 and 50 y old with a BMI
30 during abdominoplasty with consent from the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Tissue was digested using collagenase and stromal vascular cells were isolated as previously described (11). Experimental treatment of cultures containing
50% preadipocytes and
50% adipocytes occurred on d 12 of differentiation. Each experiment was conducted in duplicate and repeated at least 3 times using a mixture of cells from 2–3 subjects unless otherwise indicated.
Preparation of fatty acids.
Both isomers of CLA were complexed to fatty acid-free (
98%) bovine serum albumin (BSA) at a 4:1 molar ratio using 1 mmol/L BSA stocks.
Immunoblotting.
Immunoblotting was conducted as previously described (11). To resolve PPAR
phospho-proteins, total cell extracts (75 µg protein) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE (acrylamide:bisacrylamide, 100:1, wt:wt) containing 4 mol/L urea and to electrophoresis at 80 V for 20 h as we previously described (21). Separated proteins were subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and immunoblotted with a monoclonal PPAR
antibody. For determining the phosphorylation status of PPAR
, a portion of the cell extracts from BSA vehicle and CLA treatment were incubated with 20 U of calf intestinal phosphatase (Cip) for 30 min at 37°C and for 15 min at 55°C. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE containing urea as described above.
Immunostaining of PPAR
.
Cells were cultured on coverslips for immunofluorescence microscopy and stained as described previously (11) except for the permeabilization step. Fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 min on ice. Monoclonal anti-PPAR
(1:10) were incubated overnight at 4°C. Fluorescent images were captured with a SPOT digital camera mounted on an Olympus BX60 fluorescence microscope.
Transient transfections of human adipocytes.
For measuring PPAR
activity, primary human adipocytes were transiently transfected with the multimerized PPAR-responsive (luc) reporter construct pTK-PPRE3x-luc (22) using the Amaxa Nucleofector as previously described (21). On d 6 of differentiation, 1 x 106 cells from a 60-mm plate were trypsinized and resuspended in 100 µL of nucleofector solution (Amaxa) and mixed with 2 µg of pTK-PPRE3x-luc and 25 ng pRL-CMV for each sample. Electroporation was performed using the V-33 nucleofector program (Amaxa). Cells were replated in 96-well plates after 10 min of recovery in calcium-free RPMI media. Firefly luc activity was measured using the Dual-Glo luc kit and normalized to Renilla luc activity from the cotransfected control pRL-CMV vector. All luc data are presented as a ratio of firefly luc to Renilla luc activity. We consistently obtained
75% transfection efficiency revealed by parallel transfections with a green fluorescent protein reporter construct. Both adipocytes and nonadipocytes were transfectable using this protocol based on aP2 immunostaining and 4',6-diamidino-phenylindole nuclear staining.
RNA analysis. Following treatment, cultures were harvested for total RNA using Tri-Reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. Contaminating DNA was removed with DNAase (DNA-free, Ambion). One microgram of RNA from each sample was used for semiquantitative RT-PCR using the One-Step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) as previously described in Brown et al. (10). The gene-specific primer pairs used were previously described (10).
Lipid staining. Lipid staining of cultures of human adipocytes was conducted as previously described (10) using Oil Red O (ORO).
[3H] 2-deoxy-glucose uptake. Newly differentiated cultures of adipocytes were incubated with BSA vehicle, 30 µmol/L cis-9, trans-11 CLA, 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA, 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA + 1 µmol/L BRL, or 1 µmol/L BRL in adipocyte media for 2 d. Then, for an additional 2 d, cultures were incubated in 1 mL of serum-free basal DMEM containing 1000 mg/L D-(+)-glucose with or without 20 pmol/L of human insulin with BSA vehicle, 30 µmol/L cis-9, trans-11 CLA, 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA, 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA + 1 µmol/L BRL, or 1 µmol/L BRL in adipocyte media for another 2 d. Following the experimental treatments, insulin-stimulated uptake of [3H]-2-deoxy-glucose was measured following a 90-min incubation in the presence of 100 nmol/L human insulin as described previously (16).
Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed for data in Figure 1 testing the main effects of BRL and CLA and the interaction of the 2 (BRL x CLA) using 2-way ANOVA (JMP version 6.03, SAS Institute). Analyses for significant differences for data in Figure 4C were conducted using 1-way ANOVA. Student's t tests were used to compute individual pairwise comparisons of least square means (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as the means ± SE.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
To determine the extent to which CLA decreased PPAR
activity, basal- and ligand-induced activation of PPAR
activity were examined. There were no significant differences in basal levels of PPAR
activity due to CLA treatment in the absence of BRL (Fig. 1). However, PPAR
activity in BRL-stimulated cultures (+BRL) was lower in cultures treated with 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA compared with control and 30 µmol/L cis-9, trans-11 CLA-treated cultures. The extent to which trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreased PPAR
activity (
40%) was comparable to that of PPAR
antagonist GW9662, which inhibited ligand-induced PPAR
activity without affecting basal activity (data not shown).
Given the inverse relationship between PPAR
activity and its phosphorylation status (7), we wanted to determine the kinetics of PPAR
phosphorylation during treatment with trans-10, cis-12 CLA. Trans-10, cis-12 CLA caused a band shift in PPAR
1/2 after 24 h of treatment (Fig. 2A). Intriguingly, robust ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 24 h accompanied the PPAR
1/2 band shift, consistent with ERK1/2's role as a donor of phosphate groups to nuclear PPAR
1/2 and with our published data demonstrating that ERK1/2 is required for CLA's suppression of adipogenic gene expression and glucose uptake (11). However, because a PPAR
band shift could be due to processes other than phosphorylation (e.g. by acetylation, methylation, or sumylation), Cip was added to the cell extracts to remove phosphorylated groups. Trans-10, cis-12 CLA-induced band shifts of PPAR
1/2 were either lowered or attenuated by phosphatase treatment (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these data suggest that trans-10, cis-12 CLA promotes PPAR
and ERK phosphorylation, which contributes at least in part to CLA's isomer-specific reduction of PPAR
activity.
|
.
We previously demonstrated that a physiological level (e.g. 30 µmol/L) of trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreased the mRNA levels of PPAR
and several of its target genes in differentiating cultures of human stromal vascular cells (10) and in the newly differentiated cultures of human adipocytes (11). However, the isomer-specific impact of CLA on PPAR
protein levels in human adipocytes is unknown. PPAR
2 protein levels were decreased after 4 d and undetectable after 6 d of treatment with trans-10, cis-12 CLA compared with the BSA vehicle or cis-9, trans-11 CLA-treated cultures (Fig. 3A). Consistent with these data, newly differentiated cultures treated with 30 µmol/L trans-10, cis-12 CLA for 4 d had dramatically less nuclear PPAR
staining compared with BSA vehicle-treated cultures (Fig. 3B). These data demonstrate that trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreases PPAR
protein levels in an isomer-specific manner in newly differentiated human adipocytes.
|
ligand.
To further evaluate the antagonistic effects of trans-10, cis-12 CLA on PPAR
activity, we examined the extent to which cosupplementation with the PPAR
agonist BRL could prevent trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppression of adipogenic genes and proteins, glucose uptake, and TG accumulation. Trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreased the mRNA (Fig. 4A) and protein (Fig. 4B) levels of PPAR
, aP2, LPL, and GLUT4 compared with BSA vehicle controls or cis-9, trans-11 CLA. Although BRL cosupplementation prevented CLA-mediated reductions in aP2, LPL, and PLIN gene expression, it did not prevent CLA suppression of PPAR
2 or GLUT4 mRNA levels (Fig. 4A). Consistent with these data, BRL cosupplementation prevented CLA suppression of aP2 protein expression but did not prevent CLA suppression of PPAR
or GLUT4 protein levels (Fig. 4B).
CLA isomer-specific reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Fig. 4C) or TG accumulation (Fig. 4D) was not prevented by cosupplementation with BRL. Collectively, these data demonstrate that trans-10, cis-12 CLA chronically suppresses adipogenic gene and protein expression, glucose uptake, and TG content, which are only partially prevented by a PPAR
ligand.
Effects of withdrawal from trans-10, cis-12 CLA in presence of a PPAR
ligand.
Next, we wanted to determine whether the delipidating effects of CLA could be rescued by CLA withdrawal in the absence or presence of a PPAR
ligand. Surprisingly, withdrawal of trans-10, cis-12 CLA treatment for 2 wk did not restore the mRNA levels of LPL, PLIN, or GLUT4 gene (group 1, Fig. 5A) or the protein levels of PPAR
or GLUT4 (group 1, Fig. 5B). Interestingly, the pattern of gene and protein expression in group 1 was almost identical to that of the cultures treated for 1 wk with trans-10, cis-12 CLA (Fig. 4), indicating the effects of CLA were sustained over 2 wk. Consistent with these gene and protein data, cultures treated with trans-10, cis-12 CLA had less stainable TG 2 wk after withdrawal (group 1, Fig. 5C) compared with controls.
|
, aP2, and LPL gene expression compared with BSA vehicle- or cis-9, trans-11 CLA-treated cultures, whereas PLIN and GLUT4 were partially rescued (Group 2, Fig. 5A). BRL supplementation for 2 wk following CLA withdrawal reversed or attenuated trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppression of aP2 and GLUT4 protein levels, respectively, compared with cultures not receiving BRL for 2 wk (group 1). Although CLA-treated cultures supplemented for 2 wk with BRL (group 2) had more PPAR
protein compared with those not receiving BRL for 2 wk (group 1), PPAR
protein levels did not return to the levels of the BSA vehicle- or cis-9, trans-11 CLA-treated cultures. Similarly, supplementation of cultures with BRL for 2 wk during CLA withdrawal (group 2) increased the TG content of cultures treated with trans-10, cis-12 CLA compared with cultures not receiving BRL during withdrawal (group 1). Interestingly, BRL was only effective in preventing delipidation when it was cosupplemented with CLA and then supplemented for another 2 wk following CLA withdrawal (group 2, Fig. 5C). Taken together, these data demonstrate that trans-10, cis-12 CLA-mediated delipidation persists after CLA withdrawal and is relatively refractory to supplementation with a PPAR
ligand unless the ligand is supplemented during and after CLA treatment. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonist rosiglitazone has been demonstrated to prevent or attenuate inflammation, lipodystrophy, and insulin resistance in mice fed a crude mixture of CLA isomers (e.g. primarily cis-9, trans-11 CLA and trans-10, cis-12 CLA) (19,20). These data suggest an antagonism between one or both CLA isomers and PPAR
. However, the isomer-specific mechanism by which CLA suppresses the activity of PPAR
in human adipocytes remains unknown. We demonstrate in this article that trans-10, cis-12, but not cis-9, trans-11, CLA attenuates ligand-induced activation of PPAR
(Fig. 1), possibly via phosphorylation of PPAR
by ERK1/2 (Fig. 2). Inactivation of PPAR
leads to suppression of protein and mRNA levels of PPAR
and several of its target genes in newly differentiated human adipocytes (Figs. 3–5). BRL cosupplementation did not prevent insulin resistance caused by trans-10, cis-12 CLA (Fig. 4). Furthermore, we show that trans-10, cis-12 CLA-mediated suppression of TG accumulation does not return to control levels following CLA withdrawal or by supplementation with a PPAR
agonist following CLA treatment (Fig. 5). Only BRL cosupplementation followed by 2 wk of BRL supplementation restored the TG content of trans-10, cis-12 CLA-treated cultures to control levels. Taken together, these data provide further support for the concept that CLA's antiadipogenic effects in humans are due to the trans-10, cis-12 isomer and not the cis-9, trans-11 isomer and are directly linked to the suppression of PPAR
activity, adipogenic gene and protein expression, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, and TG content, which appears to be due in part to an antagonism of ligand-mediated activation of PPAR
.
Potential mechanisms explaining the isomer-specific attenuation of PPAR
activity by CLA are shown in our working model (Fig. 6). We propose that trans-10, cis-12 CLA, a metabolite, or a signal activated by CLA suppresses PPAR
activity by: 1) phosphorylating PPAR
via activation ERK1/2; 2) inhibiting ligand activation and heterodimer formation with RXR; or 3) impairing DNA binding of the PPRE to target genes, thereby decreasing adipogenic gene transcription, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, and TG synthesis.
|
phosphorylation.
Support for the first 2 mechanisms comes from our discovery that trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppresses adipogenic gene expression and metabolism through activation of ERK1/2 (11) and NF
B (16). Reports demonstrating that NF
B (23–27) and MAPK (28–30) activation hinders PPAR
DNA-binding affinity or transcriptional activation provides a potential mechanism by which trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppresses the expression of PPAR
target genes, leading to delipidation. ERK1/2 activates NF
B (31) and inactivates PPAR
(32), resulting in its ubiquination and proteosome degradation (33). Further support comes from studies showing that PPAR
agonists attenuate cytokine-mediated inflammation by suppressing NF
B and/or MAPK signaling (34–37). Clearly, the activity of PPAR
is regulated by its phosphorylation status via phosphatases and kinases (33). Indeed, the phosphorylation of PPAR
at a consensus MAPK site within its A/B domain (e.g. Ser-112) by ERK1/2 or c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase reduces its transcriptional activation potential, leading to insulin resistance and/or decreased adipogenesis (8,28–30,32,37,38). Interestingly, we previously reported that the MEK/ERK inhibitor U0126 blocked trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppression of adipogenic genes and glucose and fatty acid uptake (11). Consistent with these data, we found that trans-10, cis-12 CLA simultaneously increased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and PPAR
(Fig. 2A). Based on these data, our working hypothesis is that trans-10, cis-12 CLA antagonizes PPAR
's activity acutely and PPAR
expression chronically in adipocytes via NF
B and ERK1/2 activation, leading to decreased glucose and fatty acid uptake and TG synthesis.
Ligand binding.
CLA may also compete with endogenous (i.e. unsaturated fatty acids) or exogenous (i.e. rosiglitazone-BRL) ligands for activation of PPAR
. Low affinity PPAR
ligands such as PUFA increase PPAR
activity and target gene expression (39). Several CLA isomers, including cis-9, trans-11 CLA, have been shown to be ligands for PPAR
(13,40) or its partner RXR (39). Consistent with the reported antagonism between PPAR
and inflammation, cis-9, trans-11 CLA has been shown to suppress NF
B activation and inflammatory cytokine production by lipopolysaccharide in dendritic cells (41) and in white adipose tissue of obese mice (42). However, we found that cosupplementation of trans-10, cis-12 CLA-treated cultures with up to 30 µmol/L cis-9, trans-11 CLA did not reverse insulin resistance or adipogenic gene expression (data not shown). In contrast, Granlund et al. (13) demonstrated that both cis-9, trans-11 CLA and trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreased the activity of a darglitazone-stimulated, LXR
-PPRE-LUC reporter in a dose-dependent manner up to 25 µmol/L in COS-1 cells and 3T3-L1 cells. We have also demonstrated in 3T3-L1 that both CLA isomers antagonize ligand-induced activation of PPAR
(10). Alternatively, CLA phosphorylation of PPAR
in the A/B domain could reduce PPAR
affinity for ligand and/or cofactor recruitment (33).
Transcriptional activation.
Another possible mechanism by which CLA reduces PPAR
activity is by impairing DNA binding of the PPAR
/RXR heterodimer itself to the PPRE in target genes, thereby decreasing transcriptional activation. Conceptually, this would lead to decreased lipogenesis and TG accumulation. However, chromatin immunoprecipitation studies are needed to support this speculative mode of action of CLA.
One possible explanation for the long-term effects of CLA following withdrawal could be that CLA accumulates within the phospholipid and neutral lipid fractions of the cell, as we have previously shown for both isomers (10). Thus, CLA could continue to antagonize PPAR
/RXR activity following withdrawal, thereby impacting endogenous ligand production, phosphorylation, and/or directly interfering with their transcriptional activation.
In summary, although cosupplementation with BRL, a high affinity ligand for PPAR
, generally prevented or attenuated trans-10, cis-12 CLA suppression of adipogenic gene and protein expression and TG content, it did not prevent CLA's suppression of a PPAR
reporter construct or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Furthermore, BRL supplementation for 2 wk after CLA withdrawal did not completely rescue its antiadipogenic and TG-lowering effects. Taken together, these data suggest that trans-10, cis-12 CLA may decrease PPAR
activity acutely by increasing PPAR
phosphorylation via ERK1/2 and chronically by decreasing PPAR
transcription, thereby decreasing the amount PPAR
available for ligand binding, leading to the suppression of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and TG accumulation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
band shifts due to phosphorylation. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosures: A. Kennedy, S. Chung, K. LaPoint, O. Fabiyi, and M. K. McIntosh, no conflicts of interest. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used: aP2, adipocyte-specific fatty acid-binding protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin; Cip, calf intestinal phosphatase; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GLUT4, insulin-dependent glucose transporter 4; HBSS, Hanks balanced salt solution; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; luc, luciferase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; NF
B, nuclear factor kappa B; ORO, Oil Red O; PLIN, perilipin; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; RXR, retinoic acid receptor; TG, triglyceride; TZD, thiazolidinedione. ![]()
Manuscript received 14 September 2007. Initial review completed 3 November 2007. Revision accepted 11 December 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Barroso I, Gurnell M, Crowley VE, Agostini M, Schwabe JW, Soos MA, Maslen GL, Williams TD, Lewis H, et al. Dominant negative mutations in human PPAR
associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Nature. 1999;402:880–3.[Medline]
2. Savage DB, Tan GD, Acerini CL, Jebb SA, Agostini M, Gurnell M, Williams RL, Umpleby AM, Thomas EL, et al. Human metabolic syndrome resulting from dominant-negative mutations in the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-gamma. Diabetes. 2003;52:910–7.
3. Rosen ED, Sarraf P, Troy AE, Bradwin G, Moore K, Milstone DS, Spiegelman BM, Mortensen MR. PPAR is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell. 1999;4:611–7.[Medline]
4. Gurnell M, Wentworth JM, Agostini M, Adams M, Collingwood TN, Provenzano C, Browne PO, Rajanayagam O, Burris TP, et al. A dominant-negative peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) mutant is a constitutive repressor and inhibits PPARgamma-mediated adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:5754–9.
5. Mandrup S, Lane MD. Regulating adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5367–70.
6. Hamm JK, el Jack AK, Pilch PF, Farmer SR. Role of PPAR gamma in regulating adipocyte differentiation and insulin-responsive glucose uptake. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;892:134–45.[Medline]
7. Diradourian C, Girard J, Pegorier J. Phosphorylation of PPARs: from molecular characterization to physiological relevance. Biochimie. 2005;87:33–8.[Medline]
8. Hu E, Kim JB, Sarraf P, Spiegelman B. Inhibition of adipogenesis through MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPAR
. Science. 1996;274:2100–3.
9. Shiraki T, Kodama TS, Shiki S, Nakagawa T, Jingami H. Spectroscopic analyses of the binding kinetics of 15d-PGJ2 to the PPARgamma ligand-binding domain by multi-wavelength global fitting. Biochem J. 2006;393:749–55.[Medline]
10. Brown JM, Sandberg-Boysen M, Skov S, Morrison R, Storkson J, Lea-Currie R, Pariza M, Mandrup S, McIntosh M. Isomer-specific regulation of metabolism and PPAR
by conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in human preadipocytes. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:1287–300.
11. Brown JM, Boysen MS, Chung S, Fabiyi O, Morrision R, Mandrup S, McIntosh M. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) induces human adipocyte delipidation: autocrine/paracrine regulation of MEK/ERK signaling by adipocytokines. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:26735–47.
12. Kang K, Liu W, Albright K, Park Y, Pariza M. Trans-10,cis-12 CLA inhibits differentiation of 3T3–L1 adipocytes and decreases PPAR gamma expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;303:795–9.[Medline]
13. Granlund L, Juvet L, Pedersen J, Nebb H. Trans10, cis12-conjugated linoleic acid prevents triacylglycerol accumulation in adipocytes by acting as a PPAR
modulator. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:1441–52.
14. House R, Cassady J, Eisen E, McIntosh M, Odle J. Conjugated linoleic acid evokes delipidation through the regulation of genes controlling lipid metabolism in adipose tissue and liver. Obes Rev. 2005;6:247–58.[Medline]
15. Larsen T, Toubro S, Astrup A. Efficacy and safety of dietary supplements containing CLA for the treatment of obesity: evidence from animal and human studies. J Lipid Res. 2003;44:2234–41.
16. Chung S, Brown JM, Provo JN, Hopkins R, McIntosh M. Conjugated linoleic acid promotes human adipocyte insulin resistance through NF
B-dependent cytokine production. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:38445–56.
17. Riserus U, Vessby B, Arner P, Zethelius B. Supplementation with trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperproinsulinemia in obese men: close association with impaired insulin sensitivity. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1016–9.[Medline]
18. Riserus U, Arner P, Brismar K, Vessby B. Treatment with dietary trans-10 cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid causes isomer-specific insulin resistance in obese men with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1516–21.
19. Lui L-F, Purushotham A, Wendel A, Belury M. Combined effects of rosiglitazone and conjugated linoleic acid on adiposity, insulin sensitivity, and heptatic steatosis in high fat-fed mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G1671–82.
20. Purushotham A, Wendel A, Li-Fen L, Belury M. Maintenance of adiponectin attenuates insulin resistance induced by dietary conjugated linoleic acid. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:444–52.
21. Chung S, LaPoint K, Kennedy A, Martinez K, Boysen-Sandberg M, McIntosh M. Preadipocytes mediated LPS-induced inflammation and insulin resistance in primary cultures of newly differentiated human adipocytes. Endocrinology. 2006;147:5340–51.
22. Kliewer S, Umesono K, Noonan D, Heyman R, Evans R. Convergence of 9-cis retinoic acid and peroxisome proliferators signaling pathways through heterodimer formation of their receptors. Nature. 1992;358:771–4.[Medline]
23. Jiang B, Brecher P, Cohen R. Persistent activation of nuclear factor-kB by interleukin-1B and subsequent inducible NO synthase expression requires extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1915–20.
24. Ruan H, Hacohen N, Golub T, Van Parijs L, Lodish H. Profiling gene transcription in vivo reveals adipose tissue as an intermediate target for tumor necrosis alpha: implications for insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002;51:1319–36.
25. Ruan H, Pownall H, Lodish H. Troglitazone antagonizes tumor necrosis factor-a induced reprogramming of adipocyte gene expression by inhibiting the transcriptional regulatory functions of NF
B. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:28181–92.
26. Suzawa M, Takada I, Yanagisawa J, Ohtake F, Ogawa S, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T, Takeuchi Y, Shibuya H, et al. Cytokines suppress adipogenesis and PPAR-gamma function through the TAK1/TAB1/NIK cascade. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:224–30.[Medline]
27. Nie M, Corbett L, Knox A, Pang L. Differential regulation of chemokine expression by peroxisome proliferators activated receptor gamma agonists. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:2550–61.
28. Adams M, Reginato M, Shao D, Lazar M, Chatterjee V. Transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma is inhibited by phosphorylation at a consensus mitogen-activated protein kinase site. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5128–32.
29. Camp H, Tafuri S. Regulation of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor
activity by mitogen activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:10811–6.
30. De Mora J, Porras A, Ahn N, Santos E. Mitogen-activated protein kinase activation is not necessary for, but antagonizes, 3T3–L1 adipocytic differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:6068–75.[Abstract]
31. Chen L, Green D. Shaping the nuclear action of NFkB. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:392–401.[Medline]
32. Shao D, Rangwala S, Bailey S, Krakow S, Reginato M, Lazar M. Interdomain communication regulating ligand binding by PPARgamma. Nature. 1998;396:377–80.[Medline]
33. Burns K, Vanden Heuvel JP. Modulation of PPAR activity via phosphorylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1771:952–60.[Medline]
34. Su C, Wen X, Bailey S, Jiang W, Rangwala SM, Keilbaugh SA, Flanigan A, Murthy S, Lazar MA, et al. A novel therapy for colitis utilizing PPARgamma ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammartory response. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:383–9.[Medline]
35. Straus D, Pascual G, Li M, Welch J, Ricote M, Hsiang C, Sengchanthalangsy L, Ghosh G, Glass C. 15-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits multiple steps in the NF-kB signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:4844–9.
36. Chen C, Koh A, Datta N, Zhang J, Keller E, Xiao G, Franceschi R, D'Silva N, McCauley L. Impact of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway on parathyroid hormone-related protein actions in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:29121–9.
37. Engleman J, Berg A, Lewis R, Lisanti M, Scherer P. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-mediated insulin resistance, but not dedifferentiation, is abrogated by MEK1/2 inhibitors in 3T3–L1 adipocytes. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:1557–69.
38. Zhang B, Berger J, Zhou G, Elbrecht A, Biswas S, White-Carrington S, Szalkowski D, Moller D. Insulin and mitogen-activated protein kinase mediated phosphorylation and activation of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-
. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31771–4.
39. Kahn S, Vanden Heuvel JP. Role of nuclear receptors in the regulation of gene expression by dietary fatty acids. J Nutr Biochem. 2003;14:554–67.[Medline]
40. Yu Y, Correll P, Vanden Heuvel JP. Conjugated linoleic acid decreases production of pro-inflammatory products in macrophages: evidence for a PPAR
-dependent mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1581:89–99.[Medline]
41. Loscher C, Draper E, Leavy O, Kelleher D, Mills K, Roche H. Conjugated linoleic acid suppresses NF-kappa B activation and IL-2 production in dendritic cells through ERK-mediated IL-10 induction. J Immunol. 2005;175:4990–8.
42. Moloney R, Toomey S, Noone E, Nugent A, Allan B, Loscher C, Roche H. Antidiabetic effects of cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid may be mediated via anti-inflammatory effects in white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2007;56:574–82.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kennedy, A. Overman, K. LaPoint, R. Hopkins, T. West, C.-C. Chuang, K. Martinez, D. Bell, and M. McIntosh Conjugated linoleic acid-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in human adipocytes are attenuated by resveratrol J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 225 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||