Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.093260
Vol. 138, No. 11, 2186-2189, November 2008

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Donangelo, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Donangelo, C. M.
© 2008 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 138:2186-2189, November 2008


Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions

Supplementing Young Women with Both Zinc and Iron Protects Zinc-Related Antioxidant Indicators Previously Impaired by Iron Supplementation1,2

Fernanda Kamp and Carmen Marino Donangelo*

Laboratório de Bioquímica Nutricional e de Alimentos, Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be adressed. E-mail: donangel{at}iq.ufrj.br.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Iron supplementation impairs antioxidant status, whereas zinc is recognized as an antioxidant micronutrient. We investigated the effect of supplementing both zinc and iron on iron, zinc, and antioxidant status in 18 women (22–31 y) studied during 2 sequential 8-wk periods. From wk 1 to 8, only iron (50 mg/d) (Fe period) was supplemented and from wk 9 to 16, zinc (25 mg/d) (Fe+Zn period) was also given but at a different time of the day. Indicators of iron (serum iron, iron-binding capacity, and serum ferritin), zinc (serum and urinary zinc), and antioxidant status [ferric-reducing ability of plasma (FRAP); erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF); erythrocyte aminolevulinic acid dehydratase ({delta}-ALAD) activity, and in vitro zinc-{delta}-ALAD activation (Zn-{delta}-ALAD%)] were measured at baseline and after each supplementation period. Fe period modified indicators of iron status as expected (P < 0.05) but did not affect indicators of zinc status. Fe+Zn period did not affect indicators of iron status but increased serum and urinary zinc (P < 0.02). Antioxidant status was impaired after the Fe period, as indicated by decreased FRAP (P < 0.005) and {delta}-ALAD activity (P < 0.05) and increased EOF (P < 0.01). After the Fe+Zn period, FRAP values tended to increase (P = 0.1), {delta}-ALAD activity and EOF returned to baseline values, and Zn-{delta}-ALAD% decreased (P < 0.001) compared with baseline. In conclusion, supplementing young women with both zinc and iron protects zinc-related antioxidant indicators previously impaired by iron supplementation without impairment of iron status.



    Introduction
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Iron deficiency is prevalent in women of reproductive age, mainly in developing countries (1); thus, WHO recommends preventive iron supplementation of 60 mg/d to women of childbearing age (2). However, this practice may impair the antioxidant status of supplement users, particularly of those with an adequate iron status. Free iron participates in the Fenton reaction, leading to production of reactive oxygen species causing cellular damage (3,4). Studies with animals (57) and humans (810) have shown iron supplementation and oxidative stress are associated. Moreover, the use of iron supplementation may impair the nutritional status of other trace elements, such as zinc, by competitive interactions (1113).

Differently than iron, zinc is present in biological systems as a stable ion that does not participate in redox reactions, although zinc is generally recognized as an antioxidant nutrient (14,15). The acute (short-term) antioxidant effects of zinc involve mainly 2 mechanisms, antagonism with redox-active metals such as iron and stabilization of sulfhydryl groups (14,15).

It has been suggested that zinc competes with iron for binding to cell membranes and certain proteins, displacing iron and reducing the formation of reactive oxygen species (14,15). This competitive interaction has been demonstrated by in vitro (16,17) and animal (6,7) studies, suggesting that zinc has a protective role against iron-mediated oxidative stress. Therefore, combining both zinc and iron supplementation could be a beneficial alternative to iron supplementation alone for women of reproductive age, protecting iron, zinc, and antioxidant status.

Zinc can also bind to sulfhydryl groups, protecting specific proteins from oxidation (14,15). This effect has been studied mainly in the enzyme {delta}-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase ({delta}-ALAD)3 (15). Zinc protects {delta}-ALAD from oxygen inactivation, preventing enzyme thiol oxidation and disulfide formation, whereas the removal of zinc increases sulfhydryl reactivity and results in the loss of enzyme activity (15,18). It has been shown that zinc is also essential for protecting sulfhydryl groups of critical plasma membrane proteins and ensuring erythrocyte membrane stability (1921). Thus, the antioxidant effect of zinc supplementation could be investigated measuring erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity and erythrocyte membrane fragility.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of iron supplementation alone and of combined iron and zinc supplementation on iron, zinc, and antioxidant indicators in young women.


    Subjects and Methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Subjects. Eighteen female volunteers, 22–31 y of age, recruited among students and faculty at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, participated in the study after giving their written informed consent. The women were nonsmokers, apparently healthy, without a recent use of mineral and/or vitamin supplements, of acceptable weight for height, and not engaged in heavy exercise. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).

    Study design. The women were studied during 2 sequential 8-wk supplementation periods: from wk 1 to 8, only iron (50 mg/d as ferrous fumarate) was supplemented (Fe period), and from wk 9 to 16, zinc (25 mg/d as zinc gluconate) was also given (Fe+Zn period). Volunteers were instructed to consume iron supplements at bedtime and zinc supplements at lunchtime. This regimen was used to minimize intestinal interaction between iron and zinc from supplements. The women were instructed not to change their dietary and other lifestyle habits during the study. A blood sample was obtained from the participants after an overnight fast as was a spot urine sample (50 mL) immediately before supplementation began (baseline, d 1) and after each supplementation period (Fe supplementation, d 56; Fe+Zn supplementation, d 112).

To monitor compliance, the iron and zinc capsules were supplied every 4 wk in different bottles containing 28 capsules each. Participants were requested to return any remaining capsules and the degree of apparent compliance was estimated.

    Laboratory analysis. All materials employed for sample collection and analysis were either disposable or previously soaked overnight in nitric acid (1:4; v:v) and then carefully rinsed with high purity deionized water.

Blood samples were collected into heparin-containing tubes (5 mL), Na2EDTA-containing tubes (5 mL), and plain tubes (5 mL). Aliquots of heparinized blood were separated for immediate determination of hemoglobin and hematocrit by the cyanomethemoglobin method using a Hemoglobin kit (Bioclin) and by conventional capillary centrifugation, respectively.

    Iron and zinc status indices. Serum iron and free iron binding capacity were determined by colorimetric assays using commercial kits (Labtest Diagnóstica) and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) and transferrin saturation were calculated. Serum ferritin concentration was determined by immunoradiometric assay (Diagnostics Products). Serum and urinary zinc concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Perkin Elmer Plasma 1000). Urinary zinc was expressed relative to creatinine, which was measured by the Jaffe reaction, as previously described (22).

    Antioxidant status indices. Ferric-reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) was measured in fresh Na2EDTA-plasma as described by Benzei and Strain (23). Erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity and {delta}-ALAD in vitro activation with zinc (Zn-{delta}-ALAD%, percent increment in {delta}-ALAD activity by added zinc in vitro) were determined in fresh heparinized whole blood as previously described (22). Enzyme activity was expressed as µmol of porphobilinogen/(min·L) of erythrocytes and Zn-{delta}-ALAD as percentage. Erythrocyte osmotic fragility (EOF) was determined in freshly washed erythrocyte aliquots by an in vitro assay based on the degree of hemolysis in hypotonic saline solutions, as previously described (24). Conjugated dienes were analyzed in Na2EDTA-plasma using a spectrophotometric method as described by Lee (25). Urinary F2-isoprostanes were determined by competitive enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemical). Plasma and urine aliquots for conjugated dienes and F2-isoprostanes, respectively, were kept in liquid nitrogen until analysis.

    Statistical analysis. The effects of iron supplementation alone and of combined iron-zinc supplementation on iron, zinc, and antioxidant status indices were evaluated by 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Tukey's test. Correlations between variables at baseline and at the end of each supplementation period were examined by Pearson's correlation analysis. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. The statistical analyses were performed by using STATGRAPHICS (version 7 for DOS; Manugistics). Values in the text are means ± SD.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The subjects were 25.5 ± 2.9 y of age and had an adequate BMI (22.8 ± 4.9 kg/m2) that did not change throughout the study.

At the beginning of the study (Table 1), the subjects were nonanemic and generally had iron indices within the normal range (26), although 2 women had serum ferritin concentrations <12 µg/L, indicative of depleted iron stores (26). Zinc status was also adequate at baseline, as indicated by the serum zinc concentration (27).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Effect of iron supplementation and of combined iron and zinc supplementation on biochemical iron and zinc indicators in young women1

 
During the study, the estimated compliance of supplements use was considered satisfactory, because 97.6 ± 2.9% of the iron supplements and 98.0 ± 2.8% of the zinc supplements supplied were reported as consumed.

After the Fe period (Table 1), hematocrit (4%), serum iron (25%), and serum ferritin (40%) increased and TIBC decreased (5%) compared with baseline (P < 0.05). All subjects had serum ferritin concentrations >12 µg/L. The mean increment in serum ferritin concentration represented an increase of 127 mg in iron stores, assuming that each 1 µg ferritin/L plasma is proportional to ~8 mg of storage iron (26,28). Serum and urinary zinc did not change significantly from baseline.

After the Fe+Zn period (Table 1), hemoglobin, hematocrit, and iron indices remained unchanged compared with the Fe period. Moreover, serum iron, transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin were higher than baseline (P < 0.05). Serum and urinary zinc concentrations increased 11% and 88%, respectively, compared with the Fe period (P < 0.05).

Fe supplementation resulted in a reduction of 14% in FRAP (P < 0.005) and a decrease of 11% in erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity (P < 0.05), whereas EOF increased 12% (P < 0.01) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Effect of iron supplementation and of combined iron and zinc supplementation on biochemical indicators of antioxidant status in young women1

 
After the Fe+Zn period (Table 2), EOF decreased compared with the Fe period (P < 0.001), restoring values to baseline levels. Erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity also returned to baseline values. Zn-{delta}-ALAD% did not change after the Fe period but decreased by 30% after the Fe+Zn period compared with baseline (P < 0.001). After the Fe+Zn period, FRAP tended to be higher than after the Fe period (P = 0.1). Plasma conjugated dienes and urinary F2-isoprostanes did not change significantly during the study.

Erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity was correlated with plasma FRAP, hematocrit, serum transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin at baseline and after the Fe+Zn period (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Pearson correlations between biochemical indicators of the women in each study period

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The effectiveness of iron supplementation for the prevention of iron deficiency in women during reproductive age is well established (1,2). However, this practice could have a negative influence on zinc (12) and antioxidant (8,9) status. The present study provides evidence that, in nonanemic young women, supplementing both zinc and iron, at a different time of day, protects zinc-related antioxidant indicators previously impaired by iron supplementation without impairment of iron status.

Changes in the biochemical iron indicators after iron supplementation were consistent with a substantial (127 mg) increase in body iron (26,28), as shown in other studies of iron supplementation in nonanemic women (9,29,30). Despite evidence suggesting impairment of zinc status by iron supplements (12,3133), iron supplementation did not modify serum and urinary zinc in our study. Our results possibly reflect the adequate zinc status of the women at the beginning of the study and the fact that iron supplements were administered with water without food at bedtime. When zinc was supplemented at lunchtime in addition to iron at bedtime, hematological and iron status indicators remained unchanged, but serum and urinary zinc increased, consistent with a higher zinc supply (34,35). Therefore, the supplementation scheme used in our study was adequate for protecting zinc and iron status.

The negative effect of iron supplementation on antioxidant balance (39) also occurred in our study. After 8 wk of daily iron supplementation (50 mg/d), changes in plasma FRAP, EOF, and erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity indicated impairment in the antioxidant status of the women. After combining zinc and iron supplementation, plasma FRAP tended to increase (P = 0.10) and EOF and erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD returned to baseline.

The decrease in plasma FRAP after iron supplementation may be due to a reduction in endogenous plasma-reducing components, such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, {alpha}-tocopherol, and bilirubin (23,36,37). Although we did not measure plasma contributors to FRAP, plasma iron-reducing components, mainly {alpha}-tocopherol and ascorbic acid, decreased in β-thalassemia patients treated with repeated blood transfusions (37), possibly as a response to the iron overload. After combining zinc with iron supplementation, the tendency of FRAP to increase suggests that zinc could protect plasma antioxidant components, such as {alpha}-tocopherol. Zinc deficiency has been shown to impair {alpha}-tocopherol status (38).

Increased in vitro EOF was observed after iron supplementation in our study, suggesting lipid and/or protein cell membrane damage (1921,39). However, markers of lipid peroxidation (plasma dienes and urinary F2-isoprostanes) did not change with iron supplementation in our study, similarly to another study in women finding no effect of supplementing iron on plasma LDL oxidation and total dienes (29). In our study, the increased erythrocyte fragility could be due to oxidation of sulphydryl groups of cell membrane proteins by increased iron, as suggested by an ex vivo study in human atherosclerotic lesions where tissue iron levels correlated strongly with protein but not with lipid oxidation (40). However, the effect of iron supplementation on protein and lipid oxidative status of erythrocyte membrane needs to be specifically tested in further studies.

The reduction in erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity in our study after iron supplementation is consistent with animal studies relating {delta}-ALAD activity to antioxidant status (41,42). This reduction could be due to oxidation of sulphydryl groups by iron-mediated processes or loss of zinc protection (14,15,18). In our study, the decreased {delta}-ALAD activity could indicate iron oxidation, because Zn-{delta}-ALAD% did not change significantly (18).

After combining zinc and iron supplementation, the restoration of erythrocyte {delta}-ALAD activity and EOF and the reduced % Zn-{delta}-ALAD indicate improvement in zinc-related antioxidant indicators previously impaired by iron supplementation. Interestingly, several correlations between biochemical indicators observed at baseline were no longer significant after iron supplementation but were again significant after combining zinc and iron supplementation, suggesting that the antioxidant balance, previously impaired by iron, was restored by zinc. The use of other specific measurements related, for instance, to protein and {delta}-ALAD oxidation will be required in further studies to better understand the underlying mechanisms and physiologic relevance of the potential zinc-antioxidant protection.

The present study demonstrates that supplementing healthy young women with combined zinc and iron protects zinc-related antioxidant indicators previously impaired by iron supplementation alone while maintaining the nutritional benefits. Therefore, our combined supplementation scheme could be an alternative to prevent iron deficiency in women of reproductive age. However, this needs confirmation by further studies in women with poor iron and zinc status.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Fernando Viteri for critical review of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). C.M.D. is a research fellow of CNPq (Brazil). Back

2 Author disclosures: F. Kamp and C. M. Donangelo, no conflicts of interest. Back

3 Abbreviations used: {delta}-ALAD, erythrocyte delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase; EOF, erythrocyte osmotic fragility; Fe period, iron supplementation period; Fe+Zn period, combined iron and zinc supplementation period; FRAP, ferric-reducing ability of plasma; TIBC, total iron-binding capacity; Zn-{delta}-ALAD%, {delta}-ALAD in vitro activation with zinc. Back

Manuscript received 22 May 2008. Initial review completed 1 July 2008. Revision accepted 18 August 2008.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations University, and WHO. Iron deficiency anaemia assessment, prevention, and control: a guide for programme managers. WHO/NHD/01.3. Geneva: UNICEF/WHO; 2001.

2. Stoltzfus RJ, Dreyfuss ML. Guidelines for the use of iron supplements to prevent and treat iron deficiency anemia. Washington, DC: ILSI Press; 1998.

3. Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury. Biomed Pharmacother. 2001;55:333–9.[Medline]

4. Puntarulo S. Iron, oxidative stress and human health. Mol Aspects Med. 2005;26:299–312.[Medline]

5. Knutson MD, Walter PB, Ames BN, Viteri FE. Both iron deficiency and daily iron supplements increase lipid peroxidation in rats. J Nutr. 2000;130:621–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Sreedhar B, Subramaniyan R, Nair KM. A protective role for zinc on intestinal peroxidative damage during oral iron repletion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;318:992–7.[Medline]

7. Bodiga S, Krishnapillai MN. Concurrent repletion of iron and zinc reduces intestinal oxidative damage in iron- and zinc-deficient rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5707–17.[Medline]

8. Lund EK, Wharf SG, Fairweather-Tait SJ, Johnson IT. Oral ferrous sulfate supplements increase the free radicals-generating capacity of feces from healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:250–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. King SM, Donangelo CM, Knutson MD, Walter PB, Ames BN, Viteri FE, King JC. Daily supplementation with iron increases lipid peroxidation in young women with low iron stores. Exp Biol Med. 2008;233:701–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Kurtoglu E, Urgur A, Baltaci AK, Undar L. Effect of iron supplementation on oxidative stress and antioxidant status in iron-deficiency anemia. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2003;96:117–23.[Medline]

11. Solomons NW. Competitive interaction of iron and zinc in the diet: consequences for human nutrition. J Nutr. 1986;117:927–35.

12. O'Brien KO, Zavaleta N, Caufield LE, Jianping W, Abrams SA. Prenatal iron supplements impair zinc absorption in pregnant peruvian women. J Nutr. 2000;130:2251–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Chung CS, Nagey DA, Veillon C, Patterson KY, Jackson RT, Moser-Veillon PB. A single 60-mg iron dose decreases zinc absorption in lactating women. J Nutr. 2002;132:1903–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Powell SR. The antioxidant properties of zinc. J Nutr. 2000;130:S1447–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Prasad AS. Antioxidant effect of zinc in human. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:1182–90.[Medline]

16. Zago MP, Verstraenten V, Oteiza PI. Zinc in prevention of Fe2+-initiated lipid and protein oxidation. Biol Res. 2000;33:143–50.[Medline]

17. Zago MP, Oteiza PI. The antioxidant proprieties of zinc: interactions with iron and antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;31:266–74.[Medline]

18. Sakai T, Yanagihara S, Kunugi Y, Ushio K. Mechanisms of ALA-D inhibition by lead and its restoration by zinc and dithiothreitol. Br J Ind Med. 1983;40:61–6.[Medline]

19. O'Dell BL, Browining JD, Reeves GP. Zinc Deficiency Increases the osmotic fragility of rat erythrocyte. J Nutr. 1987;117:1883–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Xia J, Browning JD, O'Dell BL. Decreased plasma membrane thiol concentration associated with increased fragility of erythrocytes in zinc-deficients rats. J Nutr. 1999;129:814–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. O'Dell BL. Role of zinc in plasma membrane function. J Nutr. 2000;130:S1432–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Pires JB, Miekeley N, Donangelo CM. Calcium supplementation during lactation blunts erythrocyte lead levels and delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase zinc-reactivation in women non-exposed to lead and with marginal calcium intake. Toxicology. 2002;175:247–55.[Medline]

23. Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239:70–6.[Medline]

24. Koury JC, de Oliveira AV Jr, Portella ES, de Oliveira CF, Lopes GC, Donangelo CM. Zinc and copper biochemical indices of antioxidant status in elite athletes of different modalities. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2004;14:358–72.[Medline]

25. Lee C. Antioxidant ability of caffeine and its metabolites based on the study of oxygen radical absorbing capacity and inhibition of LDL peroxidation. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;295:141–54.[Medline]

26. Hambidge M. Biomarkers of trace mineral intake and status. J Nutr. 2003;133:S948–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hotz C, Peerson JM, Brown KH. Suggested cutoffs of serum zinc concentrations for assessing zinc status: reanalysis of the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (1976–1980). Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:756–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Lipschitz DA, Cook JD, Finch CA. A clinical evaluan index of iron stores. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:1213–6.[Medline]

29. Binkoski AE, Kris-Etherton PM, Beard JL. Iron supplementation does not affect the susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification in women with low iron status. J Nutr. 2004;134:99–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Zhu YI, Haas JD. Response of serum transferrin receptor to iron supplementation in iron-depleted, nonanemic women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:271–5.[Abstract]

31. O'Brien KO, Zavaleta N, Caufield LE, Yang D, Abrams SA. Influence of prenatal iron and zinc supplements on supplemental iron absorption, red blood cell iron incorporation, and iron status in prenant Peruvian women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:509–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Dawson EB, Albers J, McGanity WJ. Serum zinc changes due to iron supplementation in teen-age pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:848–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Sibley L, English J. Acute effects of iron therapy on zinc status during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:593–6.[Medline]

34. Yadrick MK, Kenney MA, Winterfeldt EA. Iron, copper, and zinc status: response to supplementation with zinc or zinc and iron in adult females. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;49:145–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Donangelo CM, Woodhouse LR, King SM, Viteri FE, King JC. Supplemental zinc lowers measures of iron status in young women with low iron reserves. J Nutr. 2002;132:1860–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Cao G, Prior RL. Comparison of different analytical methods for assessing total antioxidant capacity of human serum. Clin Chem. 1998;44:1309–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Livrea BMA, Tesoriere L, Pintaudi AM, Calabrese A, Maggio A, Freisleben HJ, D'Arpa D, D'Anna R, Bongiorno A. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in β-thalassemia major: iron overload and depletion of lipid-soluble antioxidants. Blood. 1996;88:3608–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Kim E-S, Sang K, Noh, Koo SI. Marginal zinc deficiency lowers lymphatic absorption of {alpha}-tocopherol in rats. J Nutr. 1998;128:265–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Srour, Bilto YY, Juma M, Irhimeh MR. Exposure of human erythrocytes to oxygen radicals causes loss of deformability, increased osmotic fragility, lipid peroxidation and protein degradation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2000;23:13–21.[Medline]

40. Stanley N, Stadler N, Woods AA, Bannon PG, Davies MJ. Concentrations of iron correlate with the extent of protein, but not lipid, oxidation in advanced human atherosclerotic lesions. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:1636–43.[Medline]

41. Soares JCM, Folmer V, Rocha JBT. Influence of dietary selenium supplementation and exercise on thiol-containg enzymes in mice. Nutrition. 2003;19:627–32.[Medline]

42. Folmer V, Soares JCM, Gabriel D, Rocha JBT. A high fat diet inhibits {delta}-aminolevulinate dehydratase and increases lipid peroxidation in mice (Mus musculus). J Nutr. 2003;133:2165–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Donangelo, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Donangelo, C. M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Nutrition