![]() |
|
|
Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ywang{at}jhsph.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
r < 0.3; P < 0.01). Proportion of agreement (>30%) and k-values (>0.2) also indicated tracking. Adjustment for tracking of energy changed little the observed tracking for other micronutrients and food groups. Factor analysis showed moderate tracking in a Western diet pattern (r = 0.47; P < 0.001) but was weaker in 2 healthier diet patterns (r = 0.31–0.36; P < 0.001). Age, gender, physical activity, and BMI predicted dietary changes (P < 0.05). Adolescents who tracked high intakes of energy, fiber, fried food, and snacks were less likely to track high BMI. Decreased energy and snack intakes were negatively related to tracking of high BMI. Overall, urban low-income African-American adolescents tracked their dietary patterns over time. The tracking was affected by baseline characteristics.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, adolescence is also a period when many physiological and psychological changes are happening in young people's lives and adolescents are more likely than younger children to be sensitive to the influence of their environment, including peer influence and the food environment outside of home. As a result, considerable changes may occur in their eating patterns during this period. Some studies have suggested a strong association between food choices and socioeconomic status (SES)4 (10,11). A recent Australian study reported that people with lower SES were more likely to purchase unhealthy food (12). Another study that included 6 Latin American cities showed that lower SES adolescents had the least knowledge of the fat and energy contents of foods and beverages (13). Compared with white children, low SES African-American children are less likely to consume healthy foods (14) and are at increased risk of overweight (15).
To our knowledge, few tracking studies have been conducted among low-income minority adolescents. In addition, although the association between diet and BMI among children has been extensively studied, few studies have examined the association between the dynamic patterns in dietary intake and BMI using longitudinal data. The purposes of this study are: 1) to examine the tracking patterns in urban low SES African-American adolescents' dietary intake over a 1-y period; 2) to study the predictors of the tracking and dynamic patterns in their dietary intakes; and 3) to explore the associations between the dynamic patterns in their dietary intake and BMI. A better understanding of these questions will provide useful information for the development of interventions to promote more healthy eating behaviors at younger ages.
| Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was based on the data collected in the 2 control schools enrolled in the Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles from school to Home for Kids (HEALTH-KIDS) Study, a randomized intervention trial to test a school-based obesity prevention program in urban low-SES African-American adolescents. At baseline, over 400 students from grades 4 to 7 in 4 Chicago public schools were enrolled in the study. Trained research staff collected data following standardized protocols at baseline and thereafter approximately every 6 mo during the 1.5 y of follow-up. Study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. More details about the HEALTH-KIDS Study are provided elsewhere (16).
Subjects
Only students from the 2 control schools with complete data on sociodemographic characteristics, dietary intake (see below), and measured height and weight at baseline (fall 2003) and 1-y follow-up (fall 2004) were included (n = 181 adolescents aged 10–14 y at baseline; 57% were girls).
Assessment of dietary intake
In the fall of 2003 (n = 236) and fall of 2004 (n = 216), participants completed the Youth Adolescent Questionnaire (YAQ), a 152-item self-administered semiquantitative FFQ developed by Harvard University (17,18). Reproducibility and validity of the YAQ has been previously described in detail (17,18). The 152-item instrument asks participants how often they usually consume each of 131 food items, along with questions regarding meal intake and the usual types and methods of food consumption. The YAQ also asked questions about the frequency of fried food consumption and the number of snacks consumed per day on school and nonschool days. Individuals with extreme energy intakes [<2093.4 kJ (<500 kcal) or >29,307.6 kJ (>7000 kcal)] or missing >70 items in the FFQ were excluded, yielding a final sample of 181 students.
Energy and nutrient intakes and food groups. Energy and nutrient intakes were calculated by Harvard University using a nutrient database specifically designed for use with the YAQ. They were presented as mean daily intake per child. This article focused only on total energy intake, fat intake, percentage of energy from fat, and fiber and calcium intakes. We aggregated the 152 items on the YAQ into 13 broad food groups such as meat, main dishes, baked goods/cereals, fruits, vegetables, dairy, snacks, and beverages, as adapted for use with the YAQ by Xie et al. (19). These food groups were used in our factor analysis to identify and study the tracking of dietary patterns. In addition, some of these groups were combined into larger categories. This study focused on the consumption of vegetables and fruits, fried food, sugar-sweetened beverages, and snack foods.
Key outcome variables
Definition of tracking of dietary intake patterns. We used gender-age-specific quartiles to define the tracking of diets. If an individual remained in the same quartile at both the baseline and 1-y follow-up surveys, this was defined as tracking. Dietary patterns were assessed based on the nutrients and food groups specified above and based on our factor analysis.
The dynamics of dietary patterns. To investigate the predictors of the dynamics of dietary intakes and the association between the dynamic patterns and BMI, we defined 4 patterns for each dietary variable of interest based on gender-age-specific medians due to our relatively small sample size: tracking high, tracking low, decrease, and increase. This also allowed us to examine factors that might predict desirable and undesirable changes. Based on their association with obesity and other chronic disease, we focused on 6 types of diet tracking patterns: tracking of high energy intake, high fiber intake, high fruit and vegetable consumption, high snack intake, a high Western diet pattern, and high fat intake [>35% of energy from fat based on the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (20)].
Main independent variables
Anthropometric measures.
Height, weight, and waist circumference were measured at baseline and 1-y follow-up. BMI was calculated for each individual based on their weight and height. The participants' body weight status was classified using the age-gender-specific percentiles from the 2000 CDC Growth Charts: 1) overweight, BMI
95th percentile; 2) at risk of overweight, 85th percentile
BMI < 95th; and 3) the others (normal weight), BMI < 85th percentile (21).
Physical activity. Information on study participants' physical activity (PA) was collected using the HEALTH-KIDS activity questionnaire (AQ). The AQ was adapted from the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-Site Studies questionnaire, which was validated among African-American girls (aged 8–10 y). The HEALTH-KIDS AQ consisted of a checklist of 30 activities that were typically performed by African-American students, along with drawn pictures of the activities. A metabolic equivalents (MET) value was assigned for each PA item based on the compendium of physical activities provided by Ainsworth et al. (22). The tertiles of the total PA-MET score were used to evaluate the PA level of adolescents in our study.
Statistical analysis
First, we calculated both Pearson and Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients but reported only the Spearman coefficients to examine the correlation between dietary intake measures at baseline and at the 1-y follow-up. Correlation coefficients are typically used to study associations and tracking (23). Spearman is a better choice than the Pearson correlation for this purpose, because it helps minimize underlying problems of outliers and data distribution (24). We chose 0.2 as the cut-off point for suggesting the existence of tracking.
Further, dietary patterns were identified and studied by principle component analysis (25) at baseline and follow-up. Stevens' method was used to specify an acceptable level of significance (26). We derived uncorrelated factors using orthogonal rotation. The scree plots and factors were observed to judge the meaningful solutions. In both cases, a 3-factor solution was selected for further analysis. Patterns were named according to those foods that had the highest factor loadings and the general nutritional content of foods that loaded highly on the pattern. Spearman correlations between the factor scores calculated for each individual at baseline and follow-up were calculated.
Next, the proportion of subjects who remained in the same quartile over time was assessed. Note that only 25% of subjects would remain in the same quartile over time if one assumes that they could move randomly into any of the quartiles at follow-up. Then we calculated k to test the agreement between each individual's relative quartile positions in both waves. Note that k = 0 when the observed agreement equals that expected by chance and k = 1 when the tracking is perfect (27). We chose a value of k > 0.2 as an indicator of the existence of tracking,
0.4 for moderate tracking, and
0.8 for strong tracking.
Finally, we fit ordinary and multinomial logistic regression models to study the predictors of the dietary tracking patterns and to test the association between the dynamic patterns of dietary intake and BMI. OR and the 95% CI were presented and adjusted for potential confounders.
Data management and analysis were carried out using SAS (version 9.2) and STATA (version 9.0). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Between-group differences by gender, body weight status, and PA levels as well as the changes of participants were compared using t test, ANOVA, and Dunnett's T3 post hoc tests (P < 0.05). Proportions were compared by their 95% CI.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The participants' mean age was 11.8 y (Table 1). Girls had a higher fat intake than boys (P = 0.014). Compared with normal-weight adolescents, overweight adolescents consumed less energy, fat, fried food, and snack food (all P < 0.05). Adolescents in the upper PA-MET score tertile were more likely to consume more energy and fiber than adolescents at the bottom tertile (P < 0.05).
|
Correlation coefficients.
Pearson (not presented) and Spearman correlation coefficients showed similar tracking patterns. An overall tracking pattern was suggested, particularly for intakes of energy, fat, fiber, calcium, vegetables and fruits, fried food, snack food, and Western diet pattern (Table 2; 0.4 < r < 0.6; all P < 0.05). The tracking of percentage of energy from fat and sugar-sweetened beverages was weak (0.2
r < 0.3; P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). In general, gender or PA did not differ in the tracking. Overweight adolescents were not significantly less likely to track intakes of fat (as percentage of energy) and sugar-sweetened beverages than normal-weight adolescents.
|
In addition, we tested how energy adjustment might affect the tracking using 2 approaches. After adjusting for tracking in energy intake (i.e. partial correlations controlling for tracking of energy intake, which was defined based on quartiles), changes in the observed tracking of the nutrients and foods were toward either direction and were small (the majority ranged between 0.01 and 0.02). If intakes were expressed as density measures (e.g. mg/4186.8 kJ or mg/1000 kcal), in general, the energy-adjusted tracking (correlations) became weaker, but the changes were relatively small except for fat intake (0.1–0.2 for the majority of intake variables).
Proportion of tracking and changing quartile rank positions.
In general, the tracking patterns were consistent (Table 3), with >30% of students maintaining their quartile positions 1 y later. For the bottom and top quartiles, the percentage of tracking was higher (
40%). k of all the diet patterns examined also indicated tracking (k > 0.2), but percentage of energy from fat and sugar-sweetened beverages had lower k-values than others. We also calculated overall proportion of desirable and undesirable changes over the 1-y period. These adolescents were less likely to increase than to maintain their intakes of total fat (P < 0.05) and snack food (P < 0.05).
|
Our multinomial logistic models show that baseline age, gender, BMI category, and PA level were not significant predictors of tracking for high-fat or high-vegetable and fruit diet, but they were significant predictors of tracking for high-energy, high-fiber, high-snack intakes, and high-Western diet pattern (Table 4).
|
The association between the dynamic patterns of diet and BMI over 1-y follow-up
Our multinomial logistic models (Supplemental Table 2) show a significant negative association between tracking of high BMI and tracking of high intakes of energy [OR = 0.40 (0.18, 0.89)], fiber [OR = 0.42 (0.19, 0.94)], fried food [OR = 0.21 (0.09, 0.52)], and snack food [OR = 0.32 (0.14, 0.72)] compared with those who tracked low-intake levels. The findings were similar for tracking of high-waist circumference, e.g. tracking high intakes of fried food [OR = 0.23 (0.10, 0.56)] and snack food [OR = 0.39 (0.18, 0.87)].
Both decreases in energy intake and in snack food consumption were negatively related to tracking high BMI; the OR were 0.31 (0.11, 0.89) and 0.36 (0.13, 0.98), respectively. In addition, girls were more likely to track high BMI than boys [OR = 2.03 (1.04, 3.96)] and the OR for older adolescents aged >13 y was 1.96 (0.98, 3.91) compared with their younger counterparts.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.5; P < 0.001) in the Western diet pattern and intakes of energy, fat, fiber, calcium, fried food, and snack food. The tracking in the 2 healthier diet patterns was weaker (r = 0.31–0.36; P < 0.001). Tracking of vegetables and fruits was strong (r = 0.43–0.49; P < 0.001), whereas tracking of percentage of energy from fat and sugar-sweetened beverages was weak (r =
0.2; P < 0.001). More than 30% of these students remained in the same quartile for all the dietary variables we examined. k-Values also indicated tracking (all k > 0.2), although percentage of energy from fat and sugar-sweetened beverages had lower k-values. To our knowledge, no studies have examined the predictors of the dynamic patterns of low-income minority young people's diet intakes using comprehensive dietary data that could reflect their usual diet. Our study attempted to fill this gap in the literature. We found that baseline age, PA, and body weight status were all likely to influence the tracking and dynamic patterns in intakes. Overweight adolescents were more likely to decrease their energy, fiber, and snack food intakes and less likely to increase snack food intake and track Western diet pattern. Physically active adolescents were more likely to consume more energy and fiber and less likely to decrease energy intake. Older adolescents were more likely to decrease their percentage of energy from fat. Girls were more likely to increase snack food intake compared with boys.
In addition, our analysis indicates that the energy-adjusted tracking (correlations) became weaker, which is similar to what has been observed previously in young adults (28). However, the influence of energy adjustment on tracking of dietary intakes is small. We suggest more attention should be focused on the non-energy-adjusted measures, because related national dietary guidelines for a number of nutrients and food groups are provided as absolute amount of intakes. However, adjusting for energy intake might introduce some methodological and interpretation concerns, e.g. reducing the variation in the intakes of some nutrients and food groups (e.g. high-fat and energy-dense foods).
We also studied the association between the tracking/dynamics of diets and the tracking/dynamics of BMI. To our knowledge, this is the first such study among U.S. minority adolescents. We expected that tracking of high intakes of energy, fried food, and snack foods would be associated with tracking of high BMI. However, our findings do not support this hypothesis, likely due to possible changes in overweight adolescents' eating behaviors. In addition, we found that decreased intakes of energy and snack foods were negatively associated with tracking of high BMI. Girls and older adolescents were more likely to track high BMI than their counterparts.
Some of our results seem to be inconsistent with those of previous studies. For example, the 6-y follow-up study we conducted in China showed that the group of children who tracked overweight had higher fat intake at baseline than the nontracking group (29). Some studies have also shown that high intakes of energy and fried food were associated with overweight in children (30,31). The differences between these earlier studies and the present one are likely due to differences in study samples, dietary assessment, and study aims (e.g. to test the effect of baseline diet or changes in diet on BMI vs. study the association between the dynamics in diet and BMI, which were assessed at the same time). Our present analysis could not clarify the causality between the dietary intake and BMI dynamics. Body weight status (e.g. overweight) might have affected some adolescents' food choices. Also, previous studies including ours have shown a strong tracking in BMI. One year may not be long enough to observe significant effects of the dynamics of diet on BMI dynamics. Moreover, these inner city, low SES African-American adolescents may present some unique characteristics of dietary patterns.
Our study has several strengths. First, it focused on a unique, underserved target population who are disproportionately affected by the growing obesity epidemic and are vulnerable to unhealthy eating habits and sedentary behaviors. Previously, little was known about the dynamic patterns in their diet. Second, using the rich data and some sophisticated statistical analysis approaches, we studied the predictors of the tracking and dynamic patterns of these adolescents' dietary intake and their association with their BMI dynamic patterns. In addition, we used different methods to assess the tracking patterns, including correlation coefficients, percentage agreement, k-values, and multiple ordinary and multinomial logistic regression analyses, all of which allowed for comparisons and testing the robustness of the related findings.
Our study also has several limitations: 1) our sample size was relatively small and might have limited our statistical power to detect more significant results; 2) the Harvard self-administrated FFQ was used to collect the dietary intake data. Although the questionnaire has been validated previously, its validity in our sample may still be questionable (32); 3) this study only studied the dynamic patterns over a 1-y follow-up and data collected during longer follow-ups are desirable; and 4) information on some psychosocial factors was not collected. Some of these factors are likely to influence the changes in adolescents' diets and BMI over time.
In conclusion, our findings indicate moderate tracking patterns in urban low-income African-American adolescents' dietary intakes over a 1-y follow-up during puberty, particularly for a Western diet pattern and intakes of energy, fat, fiber, calcium, vegetables and fruits, fried food, and snack food. The tracking was affected by gender, body weight status, and PA levels. Dynamic patterns of adolescents' diets were related to the dynamics of their body weight status, but the association was complex.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosures: J. Li, and Y. Wang, no conflicts of interest. ![]()
3 Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 are available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: AQ, activity questionnaire; HEALTH-KIDS Study, Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles from School to Home for KIDS Study; MET, metabolic equivalents; PA, physical activity; SES, socioeconomic status; YAQ, Youth Adolescent Questionnaire. ![]()
Manuscript received 23 April 2007. Initial review completed 8 June 2007. Revision accepted 11 October 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. National Academy of Sciences, NRC. Diet and health: implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington: National Academy Press; 1989.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The healthy people 2010. Boston [cited 2006 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.healthypeople.gov/.
3. CDC. Guidelines for school health programs to promote lifelong healthy eating. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996;45: RR-9:1–41.[Medline]
4. Scaglioni S, Agostoni C, Notaris RD, Radaelli G, Radice N, Valenti M, Giovannini M, Riva E. Early macronutrient intake and overweight at five years of age. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:777–81.[Medline]
5. Moore LL, Singer MR, Bradlee ML, Djousse L, Proctor MH, Cupples LA, Ellison RC. Intake of fruits, vegetables, and dairy products in early childhood and subsequent blood pressure change. Epidemiology. 2005;16:4–11.[Medline]
6. Kemm JR. Eating patterns in childhood and adult health. Nutr Health. 1987;4:205–15.[Medline]
7. Enns CW, Mickle SJ, Goldman JD. Trends in food and nutrient intakes by adolescents in the United States. Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 2003;15:15–27.
8. Singer MR, Moore LL, Garrahie EJ, Ellison RC. The tracking of nutrient intake in young children: the Framingham Children's study. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1673–7.
9. Nicklas TA. Dietary studies of children and young adults (1973–1988): the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Med Sci. 1995;310 Suppl 1:S101–8.[Medline]
10. Anderson AS, Morris SE. Changing fortunes: changing food choices. Nutr Food Sci. 2000;30:12–5.
11. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni JS, Falk LW. Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite. 1996;26:247–66.[Medline]
12. Turrell G, Blakely T, Patterson C, Oldenburg B. A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:208–15.
13. McArthur L, Pena M, Holbert D. Effects of socioeconomic status on the obesity knowledge of adolescents from six Latin American cities. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:1262–8.[Medline]
14. Ganji V, Hampl JS, Betts NM. Race-, gender- and age-specific differences in dietary micronutrient intakes of US children. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2003;54:485–90.[Medline]
15. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Ogden CL, Dietz WH. Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood BMI, weight, and height. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:301–8.[Medline]
16. Wang Y, Tussing L, Odoms-Young A, Braunschweig C, Flay B, Hedeker D, Hellison D. Obesity prevention in low socioeconomic status urban African-American adolescents: study design and preliminary findings of the HEALTH-KIDS study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:92–103.[Medline]
17. Rockett HRH, Breitenbach M, Frazier AL, Witschi J, Wolf AM, Field AE, Colditz GA. Validation of a youth/adolescent food frequency questionnaire. Prev Med. 1997;26:808–16.
18. Rockett HR. Validity and reliability of the Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1867.
19. Xie B, Gilliland FD, Li YF, Rockett HR. Effects of ethnicity, family income, and education on dietary intake among adolescents. Prev Med. 2003;36:30–40.[Medline]
20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, USDA. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. [cited 2006 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines/.
21. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;314:1–27.[Medline]
22. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32 (Suppl 9):S498–504.
23. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
24. Twisk JW, Kemper HC, Mellenbergh GJ. Mathematical and analytical aspects of tracking. Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16:165–83.
25. Newby PK, Weismayer C, Akesson A, Tucker KL, Wolk A. Long-term stability of food patterns identified by use of factor analysis among Swedish women. J Nutr. 2006;136:626–33.
26. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994.
27. Landis JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.[Medline]
28. Dunn JE, Liu K, Greenland P, Hilner JE, Jacobs DR Jr. Seven-year tracking of dietary factors in young adults: the CARDIA study. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:38–45.[Medline]
29. Wang Y, Ge K, Popkin BM. Why do some overweight children remain overweight, whereas others do not? Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:549–58.[Medline]
30. Lin BH, Frazao E. Away-from-home foods increasingly important to quality of American diet [Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 749]. Washington: Economic Research Service/USDA; 1999.
31. Taveras EM, Berkey CS, Rifas-Shiman SL, Ludwig DS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Colditz GA, Gillman MW. Association of consumption of fried food away from home with body mass index and diet quality in older children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e518–24.
32. Cullen KW, Zakeri I. The youth/adolescent questionnaire has low validity and modest reliability among low-income African-American and Hispanic seventh- and eighth-grade youth. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1415–9.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. J. Cutler, A. Flood, P. Hannan, and D. Neumark-Sztainer Major Patterns of Dietary Intake in Adolescents and Their Stability over Time J. Nutr., February 1, 2009; 139(2): 323 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||