© 2007 American Society for Nutrition
J. Nutr. 137:1591S-1596S, June 2007
Supplement: Aromatic Amino Acids and Related Substances: Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, and Application: SESSION 4
Specific Amino Acid Dependency Regulates the Cellular Behavior of Melanoma13,
Ya-Min Fu and
Gary G. Meadows*
Cancer Prevention and Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6713
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: meadows{at}wsu.edu.

ABSTRACT
Relative specific amino acid dependency is one of the metabolic
abnormalities of melanoma cells and metabolic studies of this
dependency are in their infancy. Herein, we review the current
studies in this area and present new information that adds to
the understanding of how tyrosine (Tyr) and phenylalanine (Phe)
dependency as well as other amino acids regulate the cell behaviors
of melanoma cells. Amino acid dependency of human melanoma cells
is multifactorial and restricting Tyr and Phe to melanoma triggers
a series of alterations in metabolic and signaling pathways
in a time-ordered fashion to alter different cellular behaviors.
For example, at early time points, the reduction of Tyr and
Phe alters metabolic reactions quantitatively or qualitatively.
The alterations include modulation of integrin/focal adhesion
kinase (FAK)/G protein pathways and the plasminogen activator
(PA)/PA inhibitor pathways to inhibit tumor cell invasion. At
later time periods, a further drop in intracellular amino acids
induces more metabolic alterations to impact the FAK/Ras/Raf
and Bcl-2 pathways leading to apoptosis. The threshold effects
and the targeting of multiple pathways by restriction of specific
amino acids provide a connection between the metabolic alterations
and signaling pathways that modulate the cellular behaviors
of melanoma cells. Decoding the metabolic alterations that connect
amino acid concentration to the crucial step(s) in signaling
is important and an exciting area of cancer research.
Malignant melanoma continues to increase in incidence in the
United States (
1) and metastasis is the major cause of death
in melanoma patients. The process of metastasis is very complicated
and includes invasion of melanoma cells to adjacent tissues,
intravasation and transport through the circulatory system,
arrest of the cells at a secondary site, extravasation from
the circulatory system, and growth of the invaded cells in the
secondary organ. All free amino acids are essential metabolic
substrates for tumor cells. Interestingly, melanoma cells as
well as other solid tumors exhibit relative specific amino acid
dependency that functionally regulates their survival, proliferation,
and metastasis. For example, human A375 and murine B16 melanoma
cells are tyrosine (Tyr)
4/phenylalanine (Phe)-dependent. Deprivation
of these amino acids inhibits growth and survival of these melanoma
cells without significantly affecting normal cells (
2
8).
Moreover, Tyr/Phe restriction also inhibits invasion and metastasis
of melanoma as well as other cancers (
4,
5,
9).
Metabolism is the basis for all cellular behavior. Specific amino acid dependency is one of the metabolic abnormalities of cancer cells and can also be regarded as the metabolic basis for their malignant behavior. In other words, the malignant behaviors of melanoma cells could be dependent on or related to their dependency on specific amino acids. However, the relative specific amino acid dependency of cancers has not been properly studied and most of the studies are descriptive. Thus, the mechanism by which specific amino acid restriction targets the metabolic abnormalities to inhibit the malignant behavior(s) of melanoma is largely unknown.
Specific amino acid dependency modulates invasion-related signaling/function proteins
Invasion through the extracellular matrix (ECM) by melanoma cells is important to their ability to invade normal tissues and metastasize. Invasion involves a 3-step process, including: 1) attachment and detachment of the tumor cells to ECM constituents; 2) secretion of proteolytic enzymes to degrade the local matrix; and 3) migration of the tumor cells into the area of matrix altered by proteolysis. Our previous studies showed that specific amino acid restriction affects all 3 steps by modulating a number of related molecules in various melanoma cell lines and this, in general, is consistent with the findings that restriction of Tyr/Phe or methionine (Met) in A375 melanoma cells and of Tyr/Phe, Met, or glutamine (Gln) in MeWo cell inhibits invasion [(5); Y-M. Fu and G. G. Meadows, unpublished data] (Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1 Effects of amino acid deprivation on invasion and invasion-related proteins and signaling molecules in melanoma. The following is an overview of previously published findings regarding the effects of amino acid deprivation on human A375 and MeWo melanoma and murine B16BL6 melanoma
|
Melanoma cells attach to the cell surface via integrins that
bind to ECM proteins like fibronectin and laminin. Integrins
also interact via their cytoplasmic domains to components of
the actin cytoskeleton and signaling molecules within the cell
(
10). Thus, integrins have important roles in cell motility,
invasiveness, and survival of melanoma cells (
11
15).
Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a major mediator of integrin
signaling and a key regulator of focal adhesion dynamics and
cell movement (
16
20). Also, FAK is constitutively active
in human malignant melanoma and related to its aggressive behavior
(
21). We found that specific amino acid restriction modulates
the integrin/FAK pathway and the actin cytoskeleton remodeling
of melanoma cells (
8). The integrin/FAK pathway activates small
GTPases (G proteins) such as Ras, Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 (
22),
which direct cell movement and regulate actin cytoskeletal arrangement
(
23
27). In A375 melanoma, Rho activation is required
for motility of A375 melanoma (
28). We examined the effects
of specific amino acid restriction on the GTP-binding activity
of these G proteins (
Fig. 1). Restriction of Tyr/Phe or Met
in A375 melanoma cells and of Tyr/Phe, Met, or Gln in MeWo melanoma
cells inhibits invasion and the inhibition of GTP binding to
Ras and Rho in A375 cells and that of Rho in MeWo cells. This
is consistent with the inhibition of invasion by restriction
of these specific amino acids. These data indicate that specific
amino acid restriction inhibits invasion via inhibition of the
Ras/Rho pathway. Additionally, Ras and Rho signaling also influences
the binding of integrins to their ligands that are the components
of the ECM, such as laminin and fibronectin (
12,
29). This binding
also controls the activation of integrins (
30).
Another integrin-mediated migration pathway is the FAK/CT10
sarcoma oncogene cellular homolog (Crk)/Crk-associated substrate
(Cas)/Rac pathway. In this pathway, the focal contact proteins,
p130Cas and paxillin, are phosphorylated by FAK. Then the SH2/SH3
domain adapter protein, Crk, binds to Cas or paxillin. The paxillin/Crk
or Cas/Crk complexes control cell migration via Rac-GTPase.
However, the results in
Figure 1 along with previous findings
(
5,
8) indicate that molecules like paxillin and Rac1 do not
play a major role in controlling invasion of A375 and MeWo melanoma
cells during specific amino acid restriction, and alterations
in these proteins are not consistent with the inhibition of
invasion. GTP binding activity of Cdc42 protein is reduced by
Tyr/Phe restriction in MeWo cells (
Fig. 1). This could indicate
that inhibition of Cdc42, Ras, and Rho activity are all important
in mediating inhibition of invasion in MeWo cells during Tyr/Phe
restriction. In general, we conclude that specific amino acid
restriction modulates the integrin/FAK/G protein pathways and
the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (PA)/tissue-type PA
(tPA)/PA inhibitor (PAI) pathways to inhibit invasion of melanoma
cells. However, the current findings do not explain the differences
in specific amino acid dependency in regulation of invasion
among different melanoma cell lines. Thus, additional studies
are required to examine the involvement of specific Ras- and
Rho-related binding partners.
Specific amino acid restriction induces mitochondria-initiated apoptosis of melanoma
Selective restriction of various specific amino acids causes apoptosis of melanoma cells and it is a relatively slow process (3,6,31) in which modulation of cell survival pathways are involved. Melanoma cells are adhesion-dependent cells. FAK is required for cell survival in adhesion-dependent cells, and phosphorylation of specific Tyr sites in the molecule is needed to perform this function (3234). Although the inhibition of phosphorylation of FAK by specific amino acid restriction is consistent with induction of apoptosis in melanoma cells (6,8), alteration of FAK itself does not explain the whole process of apoptosis induced by specific amino acid restriction.
In this regard, we examined the downstream events of FAK, including modulation of the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the Bcl-2 family proteins. Raf is a central component of the Ras/Raf/ MAPK pathway and is an important regulator of apoptosis (31,3540). The phosphorylation on serine338 and Tyr441 of Raf is required for its activation (4143). The anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic function of Raf primarily depends on its interaction with the Bcl-2 family proteins at the mitochondrial membrane (35,39,44). FAK regulates the proapoptotic function of Bax, a member of the Bcl-2 family of proteins (33,34,45).
Raf-1, through its N-terminal homology domain, binds to and interacts with the Bcl-2 family of proteins. Interaction between the Raf-1 and the Bcl-2 family of proteins affects the function of these proteins to control apoptosis. For example, the interaction of Raf-1 and Bcl-2 at the outer mitochondrial membrane enables Raf-1 to phosphorylate Bad, another member of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, and inactivate its pro-apoptotic function. This would also activate the anti-apoptotic function of Bcl-2 (35,38,39,44,46). Thus, the phosphorylation status of Bcl-2-related proteins and their subcellular distribution along with the subcellular distribution of Raf-1 regulate apoptosis (35,38,39,46,47). Raf-1 phosphorylation and distribution are modulated by specific amino acid restriction in A375 cells. Met restriction almost completely inhibits phosphorylated Raf in A375 cells (Fig. 2). Tyr/Phe restriction increases the amount of Bax protein and its mitochondrial localization and stimulates the cleavage of Bid and translocation into mitochondria in A375 cells [Fig. 3; (3)]. Meanwhile, the pro-apoptotic death-associated protein 3 (DAP3), which does not belong to the Bcl-2 family, is decreased in A375 melanoma, indicating that it is not involved in induction of apoptosis. Based on these results, we conclude that specific amino acid restriction interferes with the FAK/Ras/Raf survival pathways through modulation of the interaction between Raf and the Bcl-2 protein family during induction of apoptosis. However, specific amino acid restriction differentially regulates these pathways between A375 and MeWo melanoma cells, indicating that all melanoma cells do not utilize the same signaling pathways.
The mitochondria are major metabolic organelles that generate
ATP to provide energy and they contain enzymes and/or functional
proteins that regulate apoptosis. Apoptosis induced by specific
amino acid restriction is metabolism related. This slower apoptotic
pathway also depends on the alteration of mitochondrial integrity
and function. Because specific amino acid restriction modulates
Bcl-2 family members that play important roles in maintaining
mitochondrial integrity and in progression of human melanoma
(
31,
48,
49), we conducted additional experiments to examine the
alterations in mitochondrial integrity and function of melanoma
cells under specific amino acid restrictions. Loss in mitochondrial
integrity leads to the release of cytochrome c that can lead
to caspase-dependent cell death, and the release of apoptosis-inducing
factor that can lead to caspase-independent cell death (
31,
50
52).
We previously showed that Tyr/Phe deprivation modulates mitochondrial
transmembrane potential and that this modulation leads to leakage
of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol of A375
melanoma and activation of caspases (
3).
In addition to changes in mitochondrial integrity, we also found that other mitochondrial functions are affected by Tyr/Phe, Met, and Gln restriction. Energy production (ATP synthesis) is decreased (Fig. 4). ATP content is maximally decreased 2 d after deprivation of Tyr/Phe and Met; however, maximal depletion is not achieved by Gln deprivation until d 3.
Intracellular reactive oxygen species participate in a diverse
array of biological processes, including cell growth, apoptosis,
and cellular senescence. Cancer and transformed cells produce
elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and major sources
of these species are found in the mitochondria. Generation of
reactive oxygen species is increased by Tyr/Phe, Met, and Gln
restriction in A375 melanoma (Y-M. Fu and G. G. Meadows, unpublished
data); however, Gln restriction did not induce apoptosis in
these cells. Moreover, because ATP levels also decrease in response
to Gln, this further suggests that generation of reactive oxygen
species and inhibition of ATP production do not correlate with
apoptosis in A375 melanoma cells.
Amino acid restriction changes metabolism in the mitochondria; however, the exact relation between the alterations in metabolism and the induction of apoptosis is still not completely known. For example, it is possible that apoptosis-inducing factor, a mitochondrial flavin-adenine dinucleotide-binding oxidoreductase associated with oxidative phosphorylation, could play a critical role in mediating apoptosis due to specific amino acid restriction (5153) and this remains a target for further exploration.
Specific amino acid dependency: multifactorial and threshold effects
In malignant cells, different mutant cellular proteins cause aberrant interactions in signaling systems and metabolic pathways to maintain their malignant behaviors. Thus, metabolic and signaling pathways are key regulators of cellular behaviors. Recent studies indicate that some enzymatic defects of melanoma might be the cause for arginine dependency (5456) in addition to the Tyr/Phe dependency of melanomas. However, to date, studies on melanoma metabolism do not indicate the metabolic pathways or reactions that are linked directly to specific amino acid dependency-regulated cellular behavior.
Restriction of any amino acid is a metabolic stress to melanoma cells. This stress affects metabolism and cell signaling to modulate cellular behavior. Then why is melanoma relatively dependant on certain amino acids? The simple answers are: 1) the stress level induced by restriction of specific amino acids is different in each individual melanoma cell line; and 2) the level or degree of stress between melanoma and normal cells is different for each amino acid restriction. These statements are supported by previous studies that reveal the threshold effects of different amino acid restrictions on melanoma and other solid tumors (5,6,9,54,5762).
The cell surface amino acid transporters in human hepatoma and melanoma cells are not damaged by restriction of selective amino acids (62,63). The proximal event for melanoma cells during restriction is the gradual reduction in intracellular amino acid levels (62). Usually, the appearance of biological effects induced by amino acid restriction follow a time-ordered sequence: 1) inhibition of invasion; 2) inhibition of growth; and 3) induction of apoptosis. The sequence is reversed when amino acid levels are restored (5,6,54,5762). This indicates that the thresholds for each intracellular amino acid to maintain different cellular behaviors in melanoma are different. For example, during Tyr/Phe restriction, the intracellular levels of Tyr in A375 cells are higher at 24 and 48 h when inhibition of invasion and growth occur than at 72 h when apoptosis is prevalent (5,6,62). Because metabolism is the basis of cellular behaviors, these results indicate that there are differences in the metabolic demands on cells to maintain these different behaviors. The metabolic demand of the tumor cell for Tyr that is required to maintain its invasive characteristics and proliferative capacity are higher than the demand for Tyr to protect the cell from death. Thus, the threshold effects of 1 amino acid restriction in modulating multiple cellular behaviors are linked to the intracellular specific amino acid levels that trigger a series of alterations in metabolic and signaling pathways in a time-ordered fashion to alter different cellular behaviors. At a particular point, the reduction of certain amino acids alters metabolic reactions quantitatively or qualitatively. The cellular metabolism cannot support the need for a particular cellular behavior. Moreover, the metabolic perturbations induce a series of alterations in signaling pathways to inhibit this behavior.
We also found that the intracellular levels of Tyr and Phe in A375 cells are considerably higher than those found in a normal human fibroblast cell line and that the levels in fibroblasts do not decrease during restriction of these amino acids nor do they undergo apoptosis in response to Tyr/Phe restriction (6,62). This indicates that the threshold effect associated with restriction of these amino acids is different between melanoma cells and normal cell lines because their metabolic thresholds for cell survival are different.
The threshold effects and multiple pathways targeting restriction of amino acids provide an important connection between metabolic alterations and signaling pathways in modulation of the cellular behaviors of melanoma cells. The diagram in Figure 5 depicts a scheme that integrates the current understanding of this relation. Metabolic studies on specific amino acid dependency of melanoma are in their infancy. It is still unknown which metabolic alterations connect to the signaling pathways that control cell behaviors. Moreover, it is not currently possible to predict the relative specificity of amino acid dependency of different melanomas due to their heterogeneity. However, the multifactorial effects of specific amino acid restriction on melanoma cells would be an advantage in the treatment independent from the heterogeneity of the melanoma, because restriction: 1) inhibits invasion (4,5,8,9); 2) inhibits proliferation (6,7,9,5456,64); 3) induces apoptosis (6,9,5456); and 4) enhances the effect of chemotherapy (6571). The investigations in this field could lead to the development of novel metabolic approaches to control melanoma.

FOOTNOTES
1 Published in a supplement to
The Journal of Nutrition. Presented
at the "Conference on Aromatic Amino Acids and Related Substances:
Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, and Application" held July 2021,
2006 in Vancouver, Canada. The conference was sponsored by Ajinomoto
Company, Inc. The organizing committee for the symposium and
Guest Editors for the supplement were: Katsuji Takai, Dennis
M. Bier, Luc Cynober, Sidney M. Morris, Jr., and Yoshiharu Shimomura.
Guest Editor disclosure: Expenses to travel to the meeting were
paid by Ajinomoto Company, Inc. for K. Takai, D. M. Bier, L.
Cynober, S. M. Morris, Jr., and Y. Shimomura; D. M. Bier has
consulted for Ajinomoto Company, Inc. on scientific issues.

2 Supported by the National Cancer Institute, grant number R01 CA 77604. 
3 Author disclosures: G. G. Meadows, travel expenses to attend the meeting were paid by the Ajinomoto Company, Inc.; Y-M. Fu, no conflicts of interest. 
4 Abbreviations used: DAP3, pro-apoptotic death associated protein 3; ECM, extracellular matrix; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; Gln, glutamine; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; Met, methionine; PA, plasminogen activator, PAI, plasminogen activator inhibitor; Phe, phenylalanine; tPA, tissue-type plasminogen activator; Tyr, tyrosine. 

LITERATURE CITED
1. - American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta (GA): American Cancer Society; 2006.
2. - Elstad CA, Meadows GG, Abdallah RM. Specificity of the suppression of metastatic phenotype by tyrosine and phenylalanine restriction. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1990;8:393416.[Medline]
3. - Ge X, Fu Y-M, Li Y-Q, Meadows GG. Activation of caspases and cleavage of Bid are required for tyrosine and phenylalanine deficiency-induced apoptosis of human A375 melanoma cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;403:508.[Medline]
4. - Pelayo BA, Fu Y-M, Meadows GG. Inhibition of B16BL6 melanoma invasion by tyrosine and phenylalanine deprivation is associated with decreased secretion of plasminogen activators and increased plasminogen activator inhibitors. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999;17:8418.[Medline]
5. - Pelayo BA, Fu Y-M, Meadows GG. Decreased tissue plasminogen activator and increased plasminogen activator inhibitors are associated with inhibition of invasion in human A375 melanoma deprived of tyrosine and phenylalanine. Int J Oncol. 2001;18:87783.[Medline]
6. - Fu Y-M, Yu Z-X, Pelayo BA, Ferrans VJ, Meadows GG. Focal adhesion kinase-dependent apoptosis of melanoma induced by tyrosine and phenylalanine deficiency. Cancer Res. 1999;59:75865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. - Fu Y-M, Yu Z-X, Ferrans VJ, Meadows GG. Tyrosine and phenylalanine restriction induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in murine melanoma in vitro and in vivo. Nutr Cancer. 1997;29:10413.[Medline]
8. - Fu Y-M, Zhang H, Ding M, Li Y-Q, Fu X, Yu Z, Meadows GG. Specific amino acid restriction inhibits attachment and spreading of human melanoma via modulation of the integrin/focal adhesion kinase pathway and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2004;21:58798.[Medline]
9. - Fu Y-M, Yu ZX, Li Y-Q, Ge X, Sanchez PJ, Fu X, Meadows GG. Specific amino acid dependency regulates invasiveness and viability of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2003;45:6073.[Medline]
10. - Aplin AE, Howe A, Alahari SK, Juliano RL. Signal transduction and signal modulation by cell adhesion receptors: the role of integrins, cadherins, immunoglobulin-cell adhesion molecules, and selectins. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50:197263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. - Seftor REB, Seftor EA, Hendrix MJC. Molecular role(s) for integrins in human melanoma invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1999;18:35975.[Medline]
12. - Parise LV, Lee JW, Juliano RL. New aspects of integrin signaling in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2000;10:40714.[Medline]
13. - Tsuji T, Kawada Y, Kai-Murozono M, Komatsu S, Han SA, Takeuchi K, Mizushima H, Miyazaki K, Irimura T. Regulation of melanoma cell migration and invasion by laminin-5 and alpha3beta1 integrin (VLA-3). Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:12734.[Medline]
14. - Laidler P, Gil D, Pituch-Noworolska A, Ciolczyk D, Ksiazek D, Przybylo M, Litynska A. Expression of beta1-integrins and N-cadherin in bladder cancer and melanoma cell lines. Acta Biochim Pol. 2000;47:115970.[Medline]
15. - Felding-Habermann B, Fransvea E, O'Toole TE, Manzuk L, Faha B, Hensler M. Involvement of tumor cell integrin alpha v beta 3 in hematogenous metastasis of human melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:42736.[Medline]
16. - Schaller MD, Borgman CA, Cobb BS, Vines RR, Reynolds AB, Parsons JT. pp125FAK, a structurally distinctive protein-tyrosine kinase associated with focal adhesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:51926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. - Lipfert L, Haimovich B, Schaller MD, Cobb BS, Parsons JT, Brugge JS. Integrin-dependent phosphorylation and activation of the protein tyrosine kinase pp125FAK in platelets. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:90512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. - Juliano RL, Haskill S. Signal transduction from the extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1993;120:57785.[Free Full Text]
19. - Parsons JT, Martin KH, Slack JK, Taylor JM, Weed SA. Focal adhesion kinase: a regulator of focal adhesion dynamics and cell movement. Oncogene. 2000;19:560613.[Medline]
20. - Hsia DA, Mitra SK, Hauck CR, Streblow DN, Nelson JA, Ilic D, Huang S, Li E, Nemerow GR, et al. Differential regulation of cell motility and invasion by FAK. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:75367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. - Kahana O, Micksche M, Witz IP, Yron I. The focal adhesion kinase (P125FAK) is constitutively active in human malignant melanoma. Oncogene. 2002;21:396977.[Medline]
22. - Sahai E, Marshall CJ. Rho-GTPases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:13342.[Medline]
23. - Kulkarni SV, Gish G, van der Geer P, Henkemeyer M, Pawson T. The role of p120 Ras-GAP in directed cell movement. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:45769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. - Katoh K, Kano Y, Amano M, Onishi H, Kaibuchi K, Fujiwara K. Rho-kinase-mediated contraction of isolated stress fibers. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:56983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. - Hall A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science. 1998;279:50914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. - Kraynov VS, Chamberlain C, Bokoch GM, Schwartz MA, Slabaugh S, Hahn KM. Localized Rac activation dynamics visualized in living cells. Science. 2000;290:3337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. - Meili R, Firtel RA. Two poles and a compass. Cell. 2003;114:1536.[Medline]
28. - Tsutsumi S, Gupta SK, Hogan V, Collard JG, Raz A. Activation of small GTPase Rho is required for autocrine motility factor signaling. Cancer Res. 2002;62:448490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. - Bar-Sagi D, Hall A. Ras and Rho GTPases: a family reunion. Cell. 2000;103:22738.[Medline]
30. - Hynes RO. Structural biology. Changing partners. Science. 2003;300:7556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. - Ballif BA, Blenis J. Molecular mechanisms mediating mammalian mitogen-activate protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK)-MAPK cell survival signals. Cell Growth Differ. 2001;12:397408.[Free Full Text]
32. - Frisch SM, Vuori K, Ruoslahti E, Chan-Hui P-Y. Control of adhesion-dependent cell survival by focal adhesion kinase. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:7939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. - Xiong W, Parsons JT. Induction of apoptosis after expression of PYK2, a tyrosine kinase structurally related to focal adhesion kinase. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:52939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. - Hungerford JE, Compton MT, Matter ML, Hoffstrom BG, Otey CA. Inhibition of pp125FAK in cultured fibroblasts results in apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:138390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. - Wang HG, Rapp UR, Reed JC. Bcl-2 targets the protein kinase Raf-1 to mitochondria. Cell. 1996;87:62938.[Medline]
36. - Haldar S, Jena N, Croce CM. Inactivation of Bcl-2 by phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:450711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. - Blagosklonny MV, Schulte T, Nguyen P, Trepel J, Neckers LM. Taxol-induced apoptosis and phosphorylation of Bcl-2 protein involves c-Raf-1 and represents a novel c-Raf-1 signal transduction pathway. Cancer Res. 1996;56:18514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. - Wang H-G, Miyashita T, Takayama S, Sato T, Torigoe T, Krajewski S, Tanaka S, Hovey L III, Troppmair J, et al. Apoptosis regulation by interaction of Bcl-2 protein and Raf-1 kinase. Oncogene. 1994;9:27516.[Medline]
39. - Kroemer G. The proto-oncogene Bcl-2 and its role in regulating apoptosis. Nat Med. 1997;3:61420.[Medline]
40. - Green DR, Evans GI. A matter of life and death. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:1930.[Medline]
41. - Whitmarsh AJ, Davis RJ. Transcription factor AP-1 regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways. J Mol Med. 1996;74:589607.[Medline]
42. - Zang M, Hayne C, Luo Z. Interaction between active Pak1 and Raf-1 is necessary for phosphorylation and activation of Raf-1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4395405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. - Rommel C, Clarke BA, Zimmermann S, Nunez L, Rossman R, Reid K, Moelling K, Yancopoulos GD, Glass DJ. Differentiation stage-specific inhibition of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway by Akt. Science. 1999;286:173841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. - Gajewski TF, Thompson CB. Apoptosis meets signal transduction: elimination of a BAD influence. Cell. 1996;87:58992.[Medline]
45. - Gilmore AP, Metcalfe AD, Romer LH, Streuli CH. Integrin-mediated survival signals regulate the apoptotic function of Bax through its conformation and subcellular localization. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:43145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. - Zha J, Harada H, Yang E, Jockel J, Korsmeyer SJ. Serine phosphorylation of death agonist BAD in response to survival factor results in binding to 143-3 not Bcl-XL. Cell. 1996;87:61928.[Medline]
47. - Hale AJ, Smith CA, Sutherland LC, Stoneman VEA, Longthorne VL, Culhane AC, Williams GT. Apoptosis: molecular regulation of cell death. Eur J Biochem. 1996;236:126.[Medline]
48. - Gross A, McDonnell J, Korsmeyer S. BCL-2 family members and the mitochondria in apoptosis. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1899911.[Free Full Text]
49. - Bush JA, Li G. The role of Bcl-2 family members in the progression of cutaneous melanoma. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003;20:5319.[Medline]
50. - Thornberry NA, Lazebnik Y. Caspases: enemies within. Science. 1998;281:13126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. - Susin SA, Lorenzo HK, Zamzami N, Marzo I, Snow BE, Brothers GM, Mangion J, Jacotot E, Costantini P, et al. Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature. 1999;397:4416.[Medline]
52. - Joza N, Susin SA, Daugas E, Stanford WL, Cho SK, Li CYJ, Sasaki T, Ella AJ, Cheng H-Y, et al. Essential role of the mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor in programmed cell death. Nature. 2001;410:54954.[Medline]
53. - Wang X, Yang C, Chai J, Shi Y, Xue D. Mechanisms of AIF-mediated apoptotic DNA degradation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2002;298:158792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. - Scott L, Lamb J, Smith S, Wheatley DN. Single amino acid (arginine) deprivation: rapid and selective death of cultured transformed and malignant cells. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:80010.[Medline]
55. - Wheatley DN. Arginine deprivation and metabolomics: important aspects of intermediary metabolism in relation to the differential sensitivity of normal and tumour cells. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15:24753.[Medline]
56. - Dillon BJ, Prieto VG, Curley SA, Ensor CM, Holtsberg FW, Bomalaski JS, Clark MA. Incidence and distribution of argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency in human cancers: a method for identifying cancers sensitive to arginine deprivation. Cancer. 2004;100:82633.[Medline]
57. - Marten NW, Burke EJ, Hayden JM, Straus DS. Effect of amino acid limitation on the expression of 19 genes in rat hepatoma cells. FASEB J. 1994;8:53844.[Abstract]
58. - Tang DG, Li L, Chopra DP, Porter AT. Extended survivability of prostate cancer cells in the absence of trophic factors: increased proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, and the role of apoptosis proteins. Cancer Res. 1998;58:346679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. - Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N, Vazquez F, Batt DB, Perera S, Roberts TM, Sellers WR. Regulation of G1 progression by the PTEN tumor suppressor protein is linked to inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:21105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. - Persad S, Attwell S, Gray V, Delcommenne M, Troussard A, Sanghera J, Dedhar S. Inhibition of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) suppresses activation of protein kinase B/Akt and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of PTEN-mutant prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:320712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. - Meadows GG, Zhang H, Ge X. Specific amino acid deficiency alters the expression of genes in human melanoma and other tumor cell lines. J Nutr. 2001;131:S304750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. - Meadows GG, Ge X, Zhang H, Oros DE, Fu Y-M. Inhibition of invasion and metastasis during specific amino acid restriction associated with metastasis suppressor and other gene changes. In: Welch DR, editor. Cancer metastasis-related genes. 3rd vol. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 191208.
63. - Wasa M, Bode BP, Souba WW. Adaptive regulation of amino acid transport in nutrient-deprived human hepatomas. Am J Surg. 1996;171:1639.[Medline]
64. - Poirson-Bichat F, Gonfalone G, Bras-Gonçalves RA, Dutrillaux B, Poupon MF. Growth of methionine-dependent human prostate cancer (PC-3) is inhibited by ethionine combined with methionine starvation. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:160512.[Medline]
65. - Yoshioka T, Wada T, Uchida N, Maki H, Yoshida H, Ide N, Kasai H, Hojo K, Shono K, et al. Anticancer efficacy in vivo and in vitro, synergy with 5-fluorouracil, and safety of recombinant methioninase. Cancer Res. 1998;58:25837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. - Lu S, Chen GL, Ren C, Kwabi-Addo B, Epner DE. Methionine restriction selectively targets thymidylate synthase in prostate cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:791800.[Medline]
67. - Epner DE. Can dietary methionine restriction increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy in treatment of advanced cancer? J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20 Suppl 5:S4439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. - Gupta A, Miki K, Xu M, Yamamoto N, Moosa AR, Hoffman RM. Combination efficacy of doxorubicin and adenoviral methioninase gene therapy with prodrug selenomethionine. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:11818.[Medline]
69. - Miki K, Xu M, Gupta A, Ba Y, Tan Y, Al-Refaie W, Bouvet M, Makuuchi M, Moossa AR, et al. Methioninase cancer gene therapy with selenomethionine as suicide prodrug substrate. Cancer Res. 2001;61:680510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. - Kokkinakis DM, Hoffman RM, Frenkel EP, Wick JB, Han Q, Xu M, Tan Y, Schold SC. Synergy between methionine stress and chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumor xenografts in athymic mice. Cancer Res. 2001;61:401723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. - Yamamoto N, Gupta A, Xu M, Miki K, Tsujimoto Y, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Moosa AR, Hoffman RM. Methioninase gene therapy with selenomethionine induces apoptosis in bcl-2-overeproducing lung cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003;10:44550.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Takai
Introduction to the Transdisciplinary International Conference on Aromatic Amino Acids and Related Substances: Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, and Application
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2007;
137(6):
1501S - 1503S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|