![]() |
|
|
Division of Obesity and Metabolic Health, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen Centre for Energy Regulation and Obesity (ACERO), Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.mercer{at}rowett.ac.uk.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To develop a better model of juvenile obesity (i.e., one with both excess weight gain and excess fat deposition) in the current study, we tested different combinations of the diets previously employed with the Sprague-Dawley diet-induced obesity model, namely, pelleted C and HE diets, and the complete, balanced, liquid-diet supplement, chocolate-flavored Ensure (EN). The EN diet, originally used by Levin et al. (1517), demonstrated that supplementing a solid HE diet with EN caused a sustained overconsumption of energy that resulted in increased body weight and obesity in adult Sprague Dawley rats. Ensure was selected for the current study, in preference to a carbohydrate solution, to prevent further constraint on protein availability in juvenile rats. We also observed previously, in a study of adult rats involving supplementation of HE diet with EN, that, although the expression levels of a number of hypothalamic energy balance genes appeared to be influenced by feeding an obesogenic diet, the responses were similar between the HE diet and HE+EN despite the different effects of these diets on energy intake, body weight gain, and body composition. Furthermore, rats fed these various diets showed markedly different responses when they were transferred back to a C diet (18).
The current study addresses the following hypotheses concerning juvenile obesity in rats: 1) providing a choice of diets, including EN, will overcome the limitation of the HE diet alone in inducing both excess weight gain and increased body fat in juvenile rats, and 2) the effect of EN supplementation on the expression of hypothalamic energy balance genes will be apparent when the additional obesogenic effect of EN is assessed against 3 solid diet backgrounds.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Circulating hormones and metabolites. Serum leptin concentrations were measured using a rat-specific radioimmunoassay kit (Linco, RL-83K, Biogenesis). The sensitivity of the assay was reported at 0.5 µg/L, and the intra-assay CV was 1.7%. Plasma insulin was measured using a rat-specific radioimmunoassay kit (Linco, RI-13K; Biogenesis). The sensitivity of the assay was stated as 17.2 pmol/L, and the intra-assay CV was 10%. Plasma glucose, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and triglyceride concentrations were determined using the fully automated KONE analyzer methods (12,19). The sensitivities of the assays were 0.34 mmol/L, 0.04 mmol/L, and 0.06 mmol/L, respectively.
Hypothalamic gene expression.
Hypothalamic gene expression for a number of energy balancerelated neuropeptides and receptors was quantified using in situ hybridization techniques, described in detail elsewhere (20,21). Riboprobes, complementary to partial fragments of NPY, AGRP, proopiomelanocortin (POMC), cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART), leptin receptor (OBRb), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and pro-dynorphin (DYN) were generated from cloned cDNA, as previously described (12,18,2225). Glutamate decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) and enkephalin (ENK) cDNA fragments were cloned from mouse hypothalamic cDNA. The 392 bp fragment of GAD67 was amplified using primers 5'-CTAAACCATCTCGCAAGCAACTA-3' and 5'-TACAAATGGGAAGAAAATACAAGA-3' (Genebank NM_008077.2) with 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 30 s. DNA fragments were ligated into pGEMT-easy. The 473 bp fragment of ENK was amplified using primers 5'-CAAGAGGTATGGCGGYTTCA-3' and 5'-CAGTTGCTCAYGGGGGATGG -3' (Genebank NM017139) with 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. DNA fragments were ligated into pCR4Blunt-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen), and transformed into One Shot MAX Efficiency DH5
-T1 chemically Competent Escherichia Coli (Invitrogen), and automated sequencing was performed to verify the sequences of interest.
Hypothalamic coronal 20 µm sections were collected from the very caudal extent of the arcuate nucleus (ARC) rostrally onto 2 sets of 10 slides. Under this sectioning regime, sections on an individual slide would have been separated by 200 µm in their brain of origin. Representative sections were quantified for each hypothalamic region of interest. The first set of slides spanned the full extent of the ARC,
4.52 to 2.30 mm, relative to Bregma, and according to the atlas of the rat brain (26). The second set of slides continued through to 1.40 mm, relative to Bregma. Sections were fixed, acetylated, and hybridized overnight at 58°C using 35S-labeled antisense riboprobes (11.5 x1010 dpm/L). Slides were treated with ribonuclease A to remove the unhybridized probe and then desalted with a final high stringency wash in 0.1 x saline-sodium citrate at 60°C for 30 min. The slides were air dried and apposed to Biomax MR (Sigma). Autoradiographic images were quantified using the Image-Pro Plus system (Media Cybernetics), determining the intensity and area of the hybridization signal on the basis of set parameters. Integrated intensity was then computed using standard curves generated from 14C autoradiographic microscales (Amersham). Image analysis was performed by an observer who was unaware of the respective treatment groups, on 4 or 5 sections spanning the ARC for NPY, AGRP, POMC, CART, DYN, ENK, GAD67, and OBRb. Three or 4 sections, spanning the ventromedial nucleus (VMH), were used to analyze OBRb, DYN and BDNF. Two or 3 sections from the dorsomedial nucleus (DMH) were used to analyze NPY, ENK, and DYN. DYN gene expression was analyzed in the lateral hypothalamus (LH), paraventricular nucleus (PVN), and supraoptic retrochiasmatic nucleus (SOR) using 2 sections, as was CART gene expression in the SOR.
Statistical analysis.
Values are means ± SEM, and significance was determined at P
0.05. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA using GenStat, version 7.2 (Hemel Hempstead) in consultation with Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, using the solid diet (C, HE, or C+HE) and EN as factors. For simplicity, ANOVA results were presented using the terminology "effect of solid diet" and "effect of EN," and interactions are stated only when significant. All pair-wise comparisons were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls method using SigmaStat for Windows, version 1.0 (Jandel). Regression analysis was used to examine the relation between grams of body fat and circulating leptin for each diet group, and treatments were compared by ANOVA with all pair-wise comparisons analyzed by Bonferroni, using GenStat, version 7.2.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90% of total energy was consumed during the night, and increased diet choice did not increase the percentage of energy consumed during the day (data not shown). The proportional contribution of each individual diet to total energy consumption was heavily influenced by the dietary choice available (Table 1). Thus HE was preferred over C when the 2 solid diets were supplied but not when EN was also provided. More than 50% of the total energy intake was consumed as EN when it was supplemented to the C diet, but not when supplemented to the HE diet. When all 3 diets were supplied, energy intake from EN (and C, see above) exceeded that from HE. Analysis of the proportion of total energy intake derived from each macronutrient suggested that the rats were trying to achieve an optimal protein intake (Table 1). Rats given access to combination diets that included C (i.e., C+HE, C+EN, and C+HE+EN) voluntarily selected a diet that contained 17.418.3% energy as protein. Rats fed HE alone or combined with EN could achieve a protein intake of only 1415%, perhaps explaining their preference for HE, with its slightly higher protein content in the combination diet.
|
|
|
1.3 µg/L at a fixed level of adipose tissue.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Model development. Our previous investigation of juvenile diet-induced obesity, using 4-wkold rats fed the solid HE diet, resulted in the unexpected phenotype of reduced body weight but increased adiposity. The outcomes observed in this study, with this diet alone, were similar. Feeding just the HE pellet diet obliges rats to consume an energy-dense diet with a relatively low protein content, and we speculated that the phenotype observed previously (12) was due to an inadequate protein availability to meet the demands of growing rats. When given an appropriate choice, rats selected a diet that contained at least 17% protein, with dietary preferences influenced by the combinations of diets given. In general, the provision of dietary choice is obviously a more realistic manipulation in the context of the human food environment than is provision of a single diet with an imbalanced macronutrient composition. Maximum weight gain and fat and lean tissue growth was achieved by rats in groups that were able to select a diet containing at least 17% protein (with C), and where EN was also available (C+EN and C+HE+EN). Consumption of the HE and HE+EN diets provided <15% of energy from protein, with these groups returning the lowest lean tissue weight by MRI, and supporting our earlier suggestion of a marginal protein deficiency in these juvenile rats. It is also notable that the young rats studied here selected less of their total energy intake from EN than did older rats in earlier studies (18,27). This probably reflects the high protein requirement for supporting rapid lean growth in juvenile rats.
Although the consumption of the C+EN and C+HE+EN diets maximized the accumulation of fat and lean tissue, there were clear diet-specific effects on circulating metabolites and hormones that were apparently independent of body composition. Intriguingly, rats fed the C+EN diet had the lowest NEFA, triglycerides, and leptin of the 5 obesogenic-diet groups. Thus, circulating leptin levels were increased by all 5 diets relative to C, consistent with rats fed HE or high fat diets (18,28), and leptin levels within each group correlated with body fat mass, but C+EN rats had the lowest serum leptin concentration at any level of body adiposity, and grouping by EN or no EN revealed an overall depressive effect of EN on serum leptin concentrations. This apparent dissociation between adipose tissue weight and circulating leptin was reported previously in female Wistar rats fed a high-fat diet (29) and was discussed as a possible contributory factor in the weight gain on high-fat diets.
Hypothalamic gene expression.
An overall effect of solid diet was limited to expression levels in the ARC of GAD67, a rate-limiting enzyme in the production of
-aminobutyric acid. The complex profile of GAD gene expression following diet manipulation did not occur in any of the other variables measured, and additional studies would be required to unravel the importance of the current findings in diet-induced obesity.
The effects of EN supplementation on NPY and AGRP gene expression in the ARC supported our previous findings in juvenile rats (12). All 5 obesogenic diets lowered the expression of both NPY and AGRP, and mRNA concentrations were maximally decreased by EN supplementation in C or C+HE, the groups with the highest weight gain, fat, and lean tissue mass. The downregulation of orexigenic neuropeptide gene expression is consistent with the hypothesis of counter-regulatory processes attempting to limit excessive adiposity, but failing to do so (12). Overall, the supplementation of solid diets with EN appears to accentuate this downregulation. The precise feedback signals involved in downregulation of orexigenic gene expression remain to be established, however, because body fat was a more accurate predictor of magnitude of effect on gene expression, than absolute leptin levels per se.
Dynorphin mRNA is widely distributed in the hypothalamus of rats (30), and accumulating evidence suggests that consuming palatable diets rich in fat and sucrose increases expression in the ARC (31). Pair-feeding studies indicate that a contributory factor in this effect may be palatability-induced overconsumption; however, data from an earlier study of adult Sprague Dawley rats (18) suggests that palatability alone is not the only regulator of DYN gene expression. Interestingly, EN had a substantial depressive effect on DYN gene expression in the PVN, the SON, and the SOR. The SOR consists of magnocellular neurons and probably represents a caudal extension of the supraoptic nucleus [SON; also known as the caudal supraoptic nucleus (cSON)] (26, 30). Whereas DYN gene expression in the PVN and SON exhibited a similar response to diet as did NPY and AGRP in the ARC, the regulatory changes in DYN gene expression in the SOR, although again similar, were closely paralleled by the profile of the CART gene expression in the same nucleus. Depending on the precise role of CART in energy balance regulation (32,33), this coregulation may suggest an involvement in separate processes. The coregulation of DYN and CART gene expression may be explained by the substantial coexpression of these 2 peptide genes in the SOR/cSON and, indeed, in the SON (30). There is growing evidence that SON, and thus the SOR, are involved in the regulation of feeding and energy balance (3335). A coordinated variation in the expression of multiple energy-balance genes makes this a fascinating area for further experimental investigation.
In this further development of a model of juvenile obesity, our earlier observation of an obese but normal weight phenotype in rats consuming the HE diet (12) was confirmed, highlighting that this diet alone or in combination with other diets of similar protein content is probably inappropriate for mechanistic investigation in such young rats. Providing rats with a choice of diets allows them to meet their protein requirements; also, palatability-driven overconsumption appears to more reasonably represent the type of dietary exposure of adolescent humans leading to the development of an overweight and obese phenotype. These diet combinations are not only more realistic as a means of inducing obesity than the imposition of a diet that is unbalanced in terms of its macronutrient content, but are also more controlled than classical "cafeteria-type" diets. The experimental design of 3 solid diet combinations, with or without EN supplementation, successfully demonstrates the effects of EN on hypothalamic gene expression. In general, developing obesity appears to be recognized at the hypothalamic level, although the pathways to obesity differ between diets, possibly because of their macronutrient content (36,37). EN supplementation appears to engage some of the same energy balance systems as the solid obesogenic diet, HE (12), and accentuates these regulatory events. However, despite a 4050% downregulation of individual gene expression, the induced changes in these signals are apparently ineffective in fully countering the developing obese phenotype. Assuming that substantial downregulation of the activity of orexigenic neuropeptide systems, such as NPY and AGRP, would lead the animal into a state of negative energy balance in the absence of any overriding and counteracting signal, it is necessary to invoke a role for such signals. The engagement of obesogenic diets with the reward systems in the forebrain is likely to be important. Whereas our knowledge of the sensitivity of hypothalamic systems to dietary manipulation and developing obesity is growing, the interaction of endogenous homeostatic and reward systems on different dietary and genetic backgrounds remains poorly described, although the neural pathways themselves have been the subject of detailed investigation (3841). The neural pathways that permit the dominance of cortico-limbic processes over hypothalamic signaling may provide one basis for differential susceptibility to obesity.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosures: Z. A. Archer, J. Corneloup, D. V. Rayner, P. Barrett, K. M. Moar, and J. G. Mercer, no conflicts of interest. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used: AGRP, agouti-related peptide; ARC, arcuate nucleus; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; C, control diet; CART, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript; cSON, caudal supraoptic nucleus; DYN, dynorphin; EN, Ensure; ENK, enkephalin; GAD67, glutamate decarboxylase 67; HE, high energy; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acids; NPY, neuropeptide Y; OBRb, leptin receptor; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; PVN paraventricular nucleus; SON, supraoptic nucleus; SOR, supraoptic retrochiasmatic nucleus; WAT, white adipose tissue. ![]()
Manuscript received 4 December 2006. Initial review completed 4 January 2007. Revision accepted 22 March 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Cavadini C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:1824.
2. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate-induced hyperphagia and obesity in the rat: effects of saccharide type, form, and taste. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987;11:15562.[Medline]
3. Sclafani A, Xenakis S. Influence of diet form on the hyperphagia-promoting effect of polysaccharide in rats. Life Sci. 1984;34:125359.[Medline]
4. Ramirez I. Feeding a liquid diet increases energy intake, weight gain and body fat in rats. J Nutr. 1987;117:212734.
5. Malik VS, Matthias SB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:27488.
6. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:50508.[Medline]
7. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DS, Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet. 2002;360:47382.[Medline]
8. Kaur H, Hyder ML, Poston WS. Childhood overweight: an expanding problem. Treat Endocrinol. 2003;2:37588.[Medline]
9. Dietz WH. Childhood weight affects adult morbidity and mortality. J Nutr. 1998;128:411S14S.[Medline]
10. Peckham SC, Entenman C, Carroll HW. The influence of a hypercaloric diet on gross body and adipose tissue composition in the rat. J Nutr. 1977;62:18797.
11. Levin BE, Triscari J, Sullivan AC. Metabolic features of diet-induced obesity without hyperphagia in young rats. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:R43340.[Medline]
12. Archer ZA, Rayner DV, Mercer JG. Hypothalamic gene expression is altered in underweight but obese juvenile male Sprague-Dawley rats fed a high-energy diet. J Nutr. 2004;134:136974.
13. Kanarek RB, Marks-Kaufman R. Developmental aspects of sucrose-induced obesity in rats. Physiol Behav. 1979;23:88185.[Medline]
14. Hirsch E, Dubose C, Jacobs HL. Overeating, dietary selection patterns and sucrose intake in growing rats. Physiol Behav. 1982;28:81925.[Medline]
15. Levin BE. Arcuate NPY neurons and energy homeostasis in diet-induced obese and resistant rats. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:R38287.[Medline]
16. Levin BE, Dunn-Meynell AA. Defense of body weight depends on dietary composition and palatability in rats with diet-induced obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;282:R4654.
17. Levin BE, Keesey RE. Defense of differing body weight set points in diet-induced obese and resistant rats. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:R41219.[Medline]
18. Archer ZA, Rayner DV, Barrett P, Balik A, Duncan JS, Moar KM, Mercer JG. Hypothalamic energy balance gene responses in the Sprague-Dawley rat to supplementation of high-energy diet with liquid Ensure and subsequent transfer to chow. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17:71119.[Medline]
19. Archer ZA, Rayner DV, Rozman J, Klingenspor M, Mercer JG. Normal distribution of body weight gain in male Sprague-Dawley rats fed a high-energy diet. Obes Res. 2003;11:137683.[Medline]
20. Simmons DM, Arriza JL, Swanson LW. A complete protocol for in situ hybridization of messenger RNAs in brain and other tissues with radiolabeled single-stranded RNA probes. J Histotechnol. 1989;12:16981.
21. Mercer JG, Lawrence CB, Beck B, Burlet A, Atkinson T, Barrett P. Hypothalamic NPY and Prepro-NPY mRNA in Djungarian hamsters: effects of food deprivation and photoperiod. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:R1099106.[Medline]
22. Higuchi H, Yang HY, Sabol SL. Rat neuropeptide Y precursor gene expression. mRNA structure, tissue distribution and regulation by glucocorticoids, cyclic AMP and phorbol ester. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:628895.
23. Mercer JG, Moar KM, Ross AW, Hoggard N, Morgan PJ. Photoperiod regulates arcuate nucleus POMC, AGRP and leptin receptor mRNA in Siberian hamster hypothalamus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:R27181.
24. Adam CL, Moar KM, Logie TJ, Ross AW, Barrett P, Morgan PJ, Mercer JG. Photoperiod regulates growth, puberty and hypothalamic neuropeptide and receptor gene expression in female Siberian hamsters. Endocrinology. 2000;141:434956.
25. Murray JF, Mercer JG, Adan RA, Datta JJ, Aldairy C, Moar KM, Baker BI, Stock MJ, Wilson CA. The effect of leptin on luteinizing hormone release is exerted in the zona incerta and mediated by melanin-concentrating hormone. J Neuroendocrinol. 2000;12:113339.[Medline]
26. Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press. 1986.
27. Archer ZA, Brown YA, Rayner DV, Stubbs JS, Mercer JG. Effect of flavour of liquid Ensure diet supplement on energy intake in male SD rats. Physiol Behav. 2006;89:41419.[Medline]
28. Sahu A, Nguyen L, O'Doherty RM. Nutritional regulation of hypothalamic leptin receptor gene expression is defective in diet-induced obesity. J Neuroendocrinol. 2002;14:88793.[Medline]
29. Ainslie DA, Proietto J, Fam BC, Thorburn AW. Short-term, high-fat diets lower circulating leptin concentrations in rats. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:43842.
30. Elias CF, Lee CE, Kelly JF, Ahima RS, Kuhar M, Saper CB, Elmquist JK. Characterization of CART neurons in the rat and human hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol. 2001;432:119.[Medline]
31. Welch CC, Kim EM, Grace MK, Billington CJ, Levine AS. Palatability-induced hyperphagia increases hypothalamic Dynorphin peptide and mRNA levels. Brain Res. 1996;721:12631.[Medline]
32. Larsen PJ, Hunter RG. The role of CART in body weight homeostasis. Peptides. 2006;27:198186.[Medline]
33. Abbott CR, Rossi M, Wren AM, Murphy KG, Kennedy AR, Stanley SA, Zollner AN, Morgan DG, Morgan I, et al. Evidence of an orexigenic role for cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript after administration into discrete hypothalamic nuclei. Endocrinology. 2001;142:345763.
34. Timofeeva E, Picard F, Dulos M, Deshaies Y, Richard D. Neuronal activation and corticotropin-releasing hormone expression in the brain of obese (fa/fa) and lean (fa/?) Zucker rats in response to refeeding. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;15:101329.[Medline]
35. Johnstone LE, Fong TM, Leng G. Neuronal activation in the hypothalamus and brainstem during feeding in rats. Cell Metab. 2006;4:31321.[Medline]
36. Dourmashkin JT, Chang GQ, Gayles EC, Hill JO, Fried SK, Julien C, Leibowitz SF. Different forms of obesity as a function of diet composition. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29:136878.[Medline]
37. Giraudo SQ, Kotz CM, Grace MK, Levine AS, Billington CJ. Rat hypothalamic NPY mRNA and brown fat uncoupling protein mRNA after high-carbohydrate or high-fat diets. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R157883.[Medline]
38. Berthoud H-R. Multiple neural systems controlling food intake and body weight. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:393428.[Medline]
39. Berthoud H-R. Homeostatic and non-homeostatic pathways involved in the control of food intake and energy balance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:197S200S.
40. Levine AS, Kotz CM, Gosnell BA. Sugars: hedonic aspects, neuroregulation, and energy balance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:834S42S.
41. Kelley AE, Baldo BA, Pratt WE, Will MJ. Corticostriatal-hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: integration of energy, action and reward. Physiol Behav. 2005;86:77395.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||