![]() |
|
|
3 Department of Animal Science, 4 Interdepartmental Nutrition Program, and 5 Functional Genomics Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 and 6 Lonza, Inc., Fairlawn, NJ 07410
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jack_odle{at}ncsu.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because primary control of fatty acid oxidation is vested in the carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT)8 system, most notably CPT I (4), it is central to understanding the perinatal adaptive responses essential to postnatal fuel utilization. Mechanisms of regulation of postnatal fatty acid oxidation involve changes in maximal CPT activity, dependent on tissue carnitine availability. Increases in hepatic carnitine and CPT activity have been noted in pigs during the first 24 h of life, coincident with increased rates of ß-oxidation (5). However, emergence of postnatal oxidation may be ascribed to mitochondrial maturation (6), not necessarily an increased reliance on fat as an energy source. Indeed, oxidative capacity is maximal at 24 h of age, with postnatal increases in hepatic CPT activity occurring in both the fed and food-deprived state (5). Recent characterization of liver and skeletal muscle CPT I expressed in Pichia pastoris (7,8) suggests that pig-specific CPT I isotypes are kinetically distinct from rat and human isotypes, which may contribute to species differences in postnatal lipid metabolism.
There are no publications, to our knowledge, characterizing postnatal changes in molecular or kinetic parameters of CPT in the liver and skeletal muscle of various aged pigs. Postnatal patterns of CPT that reflect dietary fat vs. carbohydrate energy sources have been established for the rat (9,10), canine (11), and feline (12) and support the role of CPT in postnatal fatty acid utilization. However, observations for pig-specific CPT I that appear to deviate from established models of fatty acid regulation in neonates (7,8,13) cautions extrapolation of observations between the species in ascertaining postnatal mechanisms of lipid handling by the latter. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in CPT I gene expression and kinetics during different stages of development that coincide with changes in dietary energy supply. The physiological relevance of kinetic changes was further established by assessing prevailing tissue carnitine concentrations. Due to the role of CPT I in fuel utilization, the fundamental knowledge gained from these findings is imperative to understanding piglet lipid metabolism, which deviates from that established in rodent models.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tissue sampling. Pigs were killed via American Veterinary Medical Association-approved electrocution. Liver was excised immediately and weighed. Portions of liver and semitendinosus muscle were collected and chilled on ice for enzyme analysis of fresh tissue. Duplicate tissue samples were frozen in liquid N and stored at –80°C for determination of mRNA abundance and tissue L-carnitine concentrations.
Measurement of L-carnitine. Liver and skeletal muscle tissue (200 mg) were prepared using the procedure described by Bhuiyan et al. (14). Free carnitine was extracted from plasma (200 µL), as described by Lin and Odle (11). Dietary carnitine was extracted from pooled samples following the procedures outlined for tissues with the following modifications: 200 µL of colostrum or milk was used in place of tissue, and for dry diet samples, 200 µL of water was added to 100 mg of diet prior to homogenization (PowGen Homogenizer; Fisher Scientific) in 400 µL of ice-cold 1 mol/L HClO4. Extracted free carnitine was assayed by the enzymatic radioisotope method described by McGarry and Foster (15) and formed acetyl-carnitine was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry (LS-6500 IC; Beckman Instruments) following elution of acetyl-carnitine from an anionic (Cl–) column. Tissue carnitine concentrations were corrected using wet/dry weight ratio for comparison of tissue carnitine against CPT I Michaelis constant (Km) for carnitine, as described previously (11).
CPT I activity. Liver and skeletal muscle mitochondria were used to assess CPT I activity, as previously described (16). We isolated liver mitochondria by differential centrifugation, as described by Mersmann and et al. (6). Muscle mitochondria were isolated following the procedure of Power and Newshome (17) using isolation medium described by Saggerson and Carpenter (18). We determined mitochondrial protein by the biuret method (19). Mitochondrial integrity was assessed following ADP-stimulated respiratory rates using succinate as the substrate (20). Mitochondria with respiratory rates exceeding 3 were used for determination of CPT activity. The assay measured the rate of formation of palmitoylcarnitine from palmitoyl-CoA and carnitine. Activity of CPT I was determined over a range of carnitine concentrations from 0 to 2.5 mmol/L, whereas palmitoyl-CoA was maintained at 80 µmol/L. The CPT I activities were expressed as µmol · h–1 · g–1 mitochondrial protein) and we generated Michaelis-Menten kinetic curves (Fig. 1) for determination of CPT I Km for carnitine.
|
Reagents. Methyl-[3H]carnitine (2.5 GBq/mol) and [1-14C]acetyl-CoA (148 MBq/mmol) were purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals. Palmitoyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA, acetyltransferase, and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemicals. Ion-exchange resin (AG 1 x 8, 100–200, Cl– form) was purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories.
Statistical analysis. CPT I activity data were fit to Michaelis-Menten kinetic curves using the nonlinear model of SAS for determination of maximal velocity (Vmax) and Km according to the equation: VI = Vmax[S]/(Km+[S]). Kinetic parameters (Vmax and Km) and tissue carnitine concentrations were subjected to 2-way ANOVA appropriate for a completely randomized design with age and tissue as independent variables. Protected least significant difference tests were performed for post hoc comparison of means. The age x tissue interaction also was modeled and reported when significant. We performed all computations using the general linear model procedure of SAS. To determine significance of gene expression data, we calculated relative expression ratios (22) and SEM (23). The mean ratio determined for each stage of development was compared with the ratio determined for the newborn using Student's t test with unequal variances. Data are reported as fold of newborn within liver and skeletal muscle tissues. Values in the text are means and significant difference was P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The developmental regulation that has been characterized most prominently in suckling rats (9,10) and more recently in canines (11) and felines (12) is a salient feature of CPT I. Changes in CPT I activity and maintenance of tissue carnitine in support of CPT I Km for carnitine is an important aspect of regulation. Postnatal increases in tissue carnitine coincide with enhanced lipid utilization and are attributed to changes in dietary carnitine. Indeed, failure to suckle results in diminished tissue carnitine in neonatal rabbits (24) and rats (25) and maximal hepatic carnitine concentrations measured at birth gradually decrease with age following trends in dietary carnitine (11,26). This study suggests that initial increases in plasma and hepatic carnitine were reliant on dietary sources, whereas hepatic carnitine in pigs remained constant despite decreasing milk carnitine in late lactation and may be indicative of endogenous synthesis. Conversely, skeletal muscle carnitine was independent of dietary carnitine at all ages studied. At birth, skeletal muscle was the predominant tissue reserve for carnitine and may reflect increased capacity for carnitine uptake as well as increased retention of free carnitine. Indeed, metabolic compartmentalization of dietary carnitine differs among tissues, perhaps with carnitine deposition in skeletal muscle taking priority (27). However, the substantial increases in skeletal muscle carnitine that occur with age in humans (28) as well as felines (12) were not detected in pigs. The developmental profile determined for skeletal muscle carnitine was ascribed to postnatal hypertrophy of this tissue and its demand for carnitine to ensure adequate fatty acid oxidation for growth (11,12). The absence of developmental increases in skeletal muscle carnitine for pigs suggests that the tissue's biological demand for carnitine is met throughout development and further increases are not warranted.
To assess the metabolic demand for carnitine, we compared prevailing tissue concentrations to CPT I Km for carnitine. In skeletal muscle, the Km for carnitine was exceeded by tissue carnitine at all stages of development (Fig. 3B). Similarly, hepatic carnitine concentrations were greater than the apparent Km for carnitine during the suckling period (Fig. 3A), inferring that CPT I was not limited by carnitine availability during early development. However, postweaning, the apparent Km increased coincident with decreasing hepatic carnitine. Reciprocal shifts in CPT I Km and tissue carnitine would ensure optimal CPT I activity as demanded by fatty acids prevailing as the energy source during the suckling period. Conversely, as the suckling-weaning transition is characterized by a transition from a diet rich in milk lipids to a carbohydrate rich energy source, the increase in CPT I Km and decrease in hepatic carnitine may be integral to fuel-sensing regulation of CPT I. The mechanisms involved in the observed changes in CPT I Km are unknown. In rodents, it was suggested that N-terminal motifs are responsible for determining carnitine affinities and malonyl-CoA sensitivities of skeletal muscle and hepatic CPT I isotypes, respectively, through interactions with the enzyme's catalytic domain (29). Although not studied in pigs, similar N-terminal domains might account for carnitine affinity of the liver isotype in light of reports that the pig-specific liver isotype displays malonyl-CoA sensitivities similar to the rat muscle isotypes (7). Studies are required to verify, but it is tempting to speculate that postnatal changes in membrane fluidity may direct hepatic CPT I affinity for carnitine by altering domain interactions. Practical extrapolation of these transient postweaning changes suggests that supplemental dietary carnitine may be justified during this period.
|
The emergence of the CPT system is coupled to profound nutritional and hormonal changes that occur in the immediate postnatal period (31). The increase in circulating fatty acids that accompanies the transition to extra-uterine life is integral to postnatal lipid metabolism in several species. Studies in rodents (9), canines (10), and felines (12) infer that hepatic CPT activity is responsive to changes in dietary fat content. The current findings suggest that nutritional status is not the primary modifier of CPT I activity in pigs, as evidenced by the lack of an immediate postnatal increase as well as maintenance of liver and skeletal muscle CPT I activity following the transition from a lipid- to carbohydrate-rich diet that occurs at weaning (Table 2). Instead, modifications of pancreatic hormones that accompany increased circulating fatty acids may underlie postnatal CPT I profiles observed in pigs. The increased plasma glucagon and decreased insulin that prevail during the suckling period of the rodent (1) appear to exert long-term effects on CPT I activity by maintaining a reduced insulin/glucagon ratio that coincides with the early postnatal rise in CPT I activity (9). In suckling newborn pigs, postnatal changes in plasma glucagon and insulin promote an increase in the insulin/glucagon ratio during the first 48 h of life (30) and may antagonize early postnatal increases in CPT I activity.
Changes in CPT I activity may be coupled to the induction of the gene encoding for this enzyme (9,10). Although rapid accumulation of skeletal muscle CPT mRNA occurred after birth, postnatal increases in hepatic CPT I mRNA were not detected. Although the effects of dietary fatty acids on CPT I activity are controversial, marked increases in CPT I mRNA are stimulated by long-chain fatty acids (4). In skeletal muscle, transcriptional regulation of CPT I by fatty acids is mediated by peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
(32). However, transcriptional activation of hepatic CPT I by fatty acids occurs independent of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
(33) and studies in rat hepatocytes indicate that fatty acid–induced accumulation of CPT I transcripts is antagonized by insulin (34). Accordingly, although fatty acids may induce CPT I transcription in skeletal muscle, postnatal induction of hepatic CPT I mRNA may be under hormonal control. Interestingly, changes in liver and skeletal muscle CPT I activity were independent of postnatal changes in gene expression. Although CPT I protein was not assessed in this study, Thumelin et al. (9) reported a developmental pattern in the concentrations of immunoreactive CPT I proteins that was closely related to the pattern established for mRNA transcript amounts. Increases in hepatic CPT I activity independent of transcriptional changes noted in our study may be indicative of posttranslational modifications. Recently, covalent modification of CPT I through phosphorylation was proposed to increase enzyme activity (35). Furthermore, although ADP-stimulated respiration rate of isolated mitochondria exceeded 3 when using succinate as the substrate, potential CPT II contamination cannot be discounted. However, although CPT II could result in an overestimation of the kinetic parameters established for CPT I, it is unlikely that contamination would support the developmental profile established in both liver and skeletal muscle. In fact, hepatic CPT II remains constant at whatever stage of development studied (9).
To our knowledge, this work provides the first developmental characterization of CPT I in pigs. Although hepatic and skeletal muscle CPT I-specific activities reach maximal rates within 1 wk of life and are supported by adequate carnitine concentrations, evidence that nutritional status is not the primary modifier of developmental shifts in CPT I for the pig is presented. As CPT I is integral to lipid utilization, the fundamental information contained herein is essential to understanding fatty acid metabolism in a species of agricultural and biomedical importance.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supplemental Table 1 is available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. ![]()
7 Present address: Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210. ![]()
8 Abbreviations used: CPT, carnitine palmitoyltransferase; Km, Michaelis constant; Vmax, maximal velocity. ![]()
Manuscript received 16 September 2006. Initial review completed 12 October 2006. Revision accepted 11 January 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Girard J, Ferré P, Pégorier J, Duée P. Adaptations of glucose and fatty acid metabolism during the perinatal period and suckling-weaning transition. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:507–63.
2. Pégorier J, Duée P, Girard J, Peret J. Metabolic fate of non-esterified fatty acids in isolated hepatocytes from newborn and young pigs. Biochem J. 1983;212:93–7.[Medline]
3. Odle J, Lin X, van Kempen T, Drackely JK, Adams SH. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase modulation of hepatic fatty acid metabolism and radio-HPLC evidence for low ketogenesis in neonatal pigs. J Nutr. 1995;125:2541–9.
4. McGarry JD. The mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase system: its broadening role in fuel homoeostasis and new insights into its molecular features. Biochem Soc Trans. 1995;23:321–4.[Medline]
5. Beiber LL, Markwell MAK, Blair M, Helmrath TA. Studies on the development of carnitine palmitoyltransferase and fatty acid oxidation in liver mitochondria of neonatal pigs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973;326:145–54.[Medline]
6. Mersmann HJ, Goodman J, Houk JM, Anderson S. Studies of the biochemistry of mitochondria and cell morphology in the neonatal swine hepatocyte. J Cell Biol. 1972;53:335–47.
7. Nicot C, Hegardt FG, Woldegiorgis G, Haro D, Marrero PF. Pig liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase I, with low Km for carnitine and high sensitivity to malonyl-CoA inhibition, is a natural chimera of rat liver and muscle enzymes. Biochemistry. 2001;40:2260–6.[Medline]
8. Relat J, Nicot C, Gacias M, Woldegiorgis G, Marrero PF, Haro D. Pig muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPTI beta), with low Km for carnitine and low sensitivity to malonyl-CoA inhibition, has kinetic characteristics similar to those of the rat liver (CPTI alpha) enzyme. Biochemistry. 2004;43:12686–91.[Medline]
9. Thumelin S, Esser V, Charvy D, Kolodziej M, Zammit VA, McGarry D, Girard J, Pégorier JP. Expression of liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase I and II genes during development in the rat. Biochem J. 1994;300:583–7.[Medline]
10. Asins G, Serra D, Arias G, Hegardt FG. Developmental changes in carnitine palmitoyltransferase I and II gene expression in intestine and liver of suckling rats. Biochem J. 1995;306:379–84.[Medline]
11. Lin X, Odle J. Changes in kinetics of carnitine palmitoyltransferase in liver and skeletal muscle of dogs (Canis familiaris) throughout growth and development. J Nutr. 2003;133:1113–9.
12. Lin X, House R, Odle J. Ontogeny and kinetics of carnitine palmitoyltransferase in liver and skeletal muscle of the domestic felid (Felis domestica). J Nutr Biochem. 2005;16:331–8.[Medline]
13. Schmidt I, Herpin P. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPTI) activity and its regulation by malonyl-CoA are modulated by age and cold exposure in skeletal muscle mitochondria from newborn pigs. J Nutr. 1998;128:886–93.
14. Bhuiyan AKMJ, Jackson S, Turnbull DM, Aynsley-Green A, Leonard JV, Bartlett K. The measurement of carnitine and acyl-carnitines: application to the investigation of patients with suspected inherited disorders of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Clin Chim Acta. 1992;207:185–204.[Medline]
15. McGarry JD, Foster DW. An improved and simplified radioisotopic assay for the determination of free and esterified carnitine. J Lipid Res. 1976;17:277–81.[Abstract]
16. Bremer J. The effect of fasting on the activity of liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase and its inhibition by malonyl-CoA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981;665:628–31.[Medline]
17. Power GW, Newsholme EA. Dietary fatty acids influence the activity and metabolic control of mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase I in rat heart and skeletal muscle. J Nutr. 1997;127:2142–50.
18. Saggerson ED, Carpenter CA. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase and carnitine octanoyltransferase activities in liver, kidney cortex, adipocyte, lactating mammary gland, skeletal muscle, and heart. FEBS Lett. 1981;129:229–32.[Medline]
19. Gornal AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM. Determination of serum protein by means of the biuret reaction. J Biol Chem. 1949;177:751–66.
20. Aprille JR, Asimakis GK. Postnatal development of rat liver mitochondria: state 3 respiration, adenine nucleotide translocase activity, and the net accumulation of adenine nucleotides. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1980;201:564–75.[Medline]
21. Lyvers-Peffer PA, Lin X, Odle J. Hepatic beta-oxidation and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I in neonatal pigs after dietary treatments of clofibric acid, isoproterenol, and medium-chain triglycerides. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;288:R1518–24.
22. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2002–7.
23. Marino JH, Cook P, Miller KS. Accurate and statistically verified quantification of relative mRNA abundances using SYBR Green I and real0time RT-PCR. J Immunol Methods. 2003;283:291–306.[Medline]
24. Penn D, Schmidt-Sommerfeld E. The carnitine deprived newborn rabbit: a potential model to study carnitine deficiency. J Nutr. 1988;118:1535–9.
25. Flores CA, Hu C, Edmond J, Koldovsky O. Milk carnitine affects organ carnitine concentration in newborn rats. J Nutr. 1996;126:1673–82.
26. Robles-Valdes C, McGarry JD, Foster DW. Maternal-fetal carnitine relationship and neonatal ketosis in the rat. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:6007–12.
27. Pégorier J, Duée P, Herbin C, Laulan P, Bladé C, Peret J, Girard J. Fatty acid metabolism in hepatocytes isolated from rats adapted to high-fat diets containing long- or medium-chain triacylglycerols. Biochem J. 1988;249:801–6.[Medline]
28. Nakano C, Takashima S, Takeshita K. Carnitine concentration during the development of human tissues. Early Hum Dev. 1989;19:21–7.[Medline]
29. Zammit VA, Price NT, Fraser F, Jackson VN. Structure-function relationships of the liver and muscle isoforms of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001;29:287–91.[Medline]
30. Pégorier JP, Duée PH, Assan R, Peret J, Girard J. Changes in circulating fuels, pancreatic hormones and liver glycogen concentration in fasting or suckling newborn pigs. J Dev Physiol. 1981;3:203–17.[Medline]
31. Louet JF, Le May C, Pégorier JP, Decaux JF, Girard J. Regulation of liver carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene expression by hormones and fatty acids. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001;29:310–6.[Medline]
32. Mascaro C, Acosta E, Oritz JA, Marrero PF, Hegardt FG, Haro D. Control of human muscle-type carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene transcription by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:8560–3.
33. Le May C, Cauzac M, Diradourian C, Perdereau D, Girard J, Burnol AF, Pégorier JP. Fatty acids induce L-CPT I gene expression through a PPARalpha-independent mechanism in rat hepatoma cells. J Nutr. 2005;135:2313–9.
34. Chatelain F, Kohl C, Esser V, McGarry JD, Girard J, Pégorier J. Cyclic AMP and fatty acids increase carnitine palmitoyltransferase I transcription in cultured rat hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem. 1996;235:789–98.[Medline]
35. Kerner J, Distler AM, Minkler P, Parland W, Peterman SM, Hoppel CL. Phosphorylation of rat liver mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I (CPT-I): effect on the enzyme's kinetic properties. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:41104–13.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||