![]() |
|
|
3 Riddet Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand 445 and 4 INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior, CRNH-IdF, F-75005 Paris, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.deglaire{at}massey.ac.nz.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several methods are available for determining gut EAAFL. The protein-free diet (PF), although used routinely in dietary protein evaluation (3), creates a nonphysiological state (4) by inducing a negative body nitrogen (N) balance, which may lead to a decreased rate of whole body protein synthesis (5) and thus lowered gut EAAFL compared with protein alimentation (2,6,7). However, previous results suggest that body N balance per se does not affect EAAFL (6–8). Peptides arising from protein digestion may have a specific effect on gut protein secretion and reabsorption (6). The enzyme-hydrolyzed protein method was proposed as an alternative method to the PF diet for determining ileal endogenous protein losses routinely (9). This technique consists of measuring ileal endogenous N and AA under conditions in which the gut is supplied with dietary AA and peptides [hydrolyzed casein, molecular weight (MW) <5 kDa], mimicking the breakdown products of natural digestion. After digesta centrifugation and ultrafiltration (10 kDa, MW cutoff), endogenous protein is determined in the high fraction MW. Any undigested dietary AA (MW <10 kDa) are discarded as well as any small endogenous peptides and free AA, leading to some degree of underestimation of EAAFL. Nevertheless, application of the enzyme hydrolyzed protein method appears to lead to higher estimates of endogenous ileal protein losses than PF or synthetic AA diets (6,7,10), but this has not been assessed in a study whereby dietary electrolyte balance (DEB; Na++K+–Cl–) and dietary AA composition have been controlled. Our aim was to assess the effect on ileal endogenous protein flows consequent on feeding animals diets supplying similar AA either in the form of peptides (HC diet) or free L-AA (A1 and A2 diet) when DEB was adjusted to be similar in the various diets. A PF diet served as a control. The HC, A1, and A2 diets had similar AA compositions, except that Asp and Ser were omitted from diet A1 and Gly and Ala were omitted from the A2 diet, to enable direct determination of their endogenous losses (8). The omitted dietary nonessential AA were chosen as representative of different AA absorption mechanisms (11). Endogenous N and AA losses in rats fed the HC diet were determined using the hydrolyzed-protein/ultrafiltration technique (12).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diets. We prepared 4 semisynthetic test diets (Table 1), including a PF diet and diets containing as the sole source of N enzyme-hydrolyzed casein (HC diet) or a free L-AA mixture simulating the HC except for the omitted AA Ser and Asp (A1 diet) or Gly and Ala (A2 diet). All diets were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of the growing rat (13). Dietary AA contents (Table 2), although lower in the HC diet than in the A1 and A2 diets, were in a comparable range. Sodium bicarbonate was added to the PF, A1, and A2 diets. The DEB in the final diets ranged from 158 (HC) to 216 ± 2 mEq/kg (PF, A1, and A2). Titanium dioxide was added to the diets as an indigestible marker. A standard casein-based preliminary diet was prepared.
|
|
The MW profile was determined using an HPLC gel filtration column (TSKGel G2000SWXL, 30 cm, Phenomenex). The eluting solvent contained 36% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, with detection at a wavelength of 205 nm; 21% of the peptides were 1–5 kDa in size and 79% were <1 kDa.
Experimental design. For the entire study, rats received 8 meals/d given at hourly intervals and each for a 10-min period. The rats were acclimatized from d 0–9 while receiving the preliminary diet. The rats were then randomly allocated to the test diets (n = 12 per treatment), which they received from d 10 to d 17. Food intake was recorded daily. The rats were killed 6 h ± 15 min after the first meal as previously described (15). The stomach, the final 20 cm of ileum, and the cecum/colon were first removed. The remaining section of the small intestine was divided into 2 equal parts labeled proximal and medial intestine. Digesta were gently removed using ice-cold saline solution and immediately frozen at –20°C, then freeze-dried and ground.
Chemical analysis. Digesta were pooled across randomly selected pairs of rats within each treatment to yield 6 digesta samples per treatment for each intestine section. Ileal digesta from rats fed the HC diet were divided into 2 portions to be analyzed in the original condition or after centrifugation and ultrafiltration (UF digesta). The latter portion was rehydrated overnight and then centrifuged (1400 x g; 30 min, 3 ± 1°C). The supernatant was ultrafiltered (Centriprep-10 devices, 10-kDa MW cutoff; Amicon) as described previously (16). The resulting retentate (MW >10 kDa) was added to the precipitate from the centrifugation step and freeze-dried and finally ground.
Diets and digesta samples were analyzed for TiO2, total N (TN), and AA. TN was determined using an elemental N analyzer (NA series 2, Fisons Instruments) (17). AA were determined after acid hydrolysis using a Waters ion exchange HPLC system (18). Met and Cys were measured as methionine sulfone and cysteic acid after performic acid oxidation (19). Met and Cys were not determined in HC ileal digesta because of limited sample size. TiO2 was determined by a colorimetric assay after ashing the sample and digestion of the minerals (20).
Minerals were determined in hydrolyzed casein. Na and K were analyzed after acid digestion using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (21). The chloride ion was analyzed after weak acid extraction by potentiometric determination (21).
Data analysis.
Gut AA flow (AAFL) and N flow (NFL) [µg/g dry matter intake (DMI)] were determined as follows:
![]() | (Eq. 1) |
Total (dietary and endogenous) NFL were calculated using Eq. 1 in digesta from rats fed the HC diet before any processing. Endogenous NFL (ENFL) and EAAFL were calculated using Eq. 1 in digesta from rats fed the PF diet and in UF digesta from rats fed the HC diet. EAAFL of the omitted AA were determined directly in digesta from rats fed diets A1 and A2.
Apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and standardized digestibility (SID; %) of AA (or N) were calculated as follows:
![]() | (Eq. 2) |
![]() | (Eq. 3) |
The N contents of individually determined AA were summed to give an estimate of
-amino N (
-AN). The terminology "standardized digestibility" was used as defined by Stein et al. (22) and relates to the previously used term "true digestibility."
Data were tested for homogeneity of variance using Bartlett's test and then subjected to a 1-way ANOVA (SAS, version 8.2). The food intake data were subjected to a 1-way ANOVA for repeated measures. For P < 0.05, the significance of differences between means was determined using Tukey's test. Results are given as means ± SE.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The endogenous flows of Asp and Ser were similar between rats fed the PF and A1 diets but were lower (P < 0.001) than those for rats fed the HC diet (Table 3). The endogenous flow of Ala was similar between rats fed the PF and A2 diets but was lower (P < 0.001) compared with that of rats fed the HC diet. On the contrary, the endogenous flow of Gly was higher (P < 0.05) for rats fed the PF and A2 diets than that for rats fed the HC diet (Table 3). Endogenous flows of Asp and Ser or Ala and Gly were not significantly different (P > 0.05) in any of the intestinal sections between rats fed the PF and A1 diets or the PF and A2 diets, except for the flow of Ser in the stomach, which was greater for rats fed the A1 diet than for those fed the PF diet (Table 3). EAAFL were considerable in the stomach and in the proximal intestine and thereafter declined to lower and relatively constant flows.
|
2 times; P < 0.05) compared with that for rats given the PF diet.
|
|
-AN, the values for which were 628 ± 57 for rats fed the PF diet, 637 ± 29 for rats fed the A1 diet, 647 ± 40 for rats fed the A2 diet, and 1071 ± 56 for rats fed the HC diet. The total NFL for rats fed the HC diet was 1428 ± 194 µg/g DMI.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DEB, in particular, may be an important consideration when determining endogenous AA losses, because it has been reported to influence the AID of N (25). Enzyme-hydrolyzed casein contains a high amount of sodium, so in this study, NaHCO3 was added to the PF, A1, and A2 diets to ensure comparable DEB. The TN content of diets A1 and A2 was lower than that of the HC diet, because AA were purposefully omitted from the diet AA mixtures and no correction was made for the N from the carboxyamide groups of Gln and Asn lost during AA analysis of the HC. The
-AN content was similar in the A1, A2, and HC diets.
Ileal endogenous flows of Asp, Ser, Gly, and Ala were similar in rats fed diets A1 and A2 (devoid of these particular AA) and in rats fed the PF diet, which is consistent with earlier data (7,8). When endogenous ileal AAFL were determined for the other AA, assuming a virtually complete absorption of the synthetic AA, flows were generally similar to those observed for the PF diet. Methionine was an exception whereby the flow was much lower for the PF diet. The ENFL for rats fed the PF diet were in agreement with earlier data (15,23,26) and were similar to those for rats fed diets A1 and A2. These findings confirm the observation that body N balance per se does not influence gut endogenous protein losses in the growing rat. A similar observation has been made in pigs fed a PF diet with a simultaneous i.v. AA infusion (27,28).
The ileal EAAFL in rats fed the HC diet were in the range of previous estimates (7,12,16,23,24,29). The HC diet generally resulted in higher EAAFL compared with the PF diet, which is consistent with earlier findings in rats (7,12,23,30), pigs (27,31,32), and humans (2). The difference in our study was of a lower magnitude than previously reported (7,12,23,30).
A higher endogenous flow of Gly was observed for the PF feeding, which has also been noted previously (8,29,33). This has been suggested to be directly related to the protein-free condition of the animals, because an i.v. infusion of AA to pigs fed a PF diet numerically decreased Gly flow (27,28), which is consistent with the effect observed here when synthetic AA were ingested. It is important to note, however, that the differences were not significant in either study. An underestimation of Gly flow may occur with the centrifugation and ultrafiltration technique, thus explaining the low Gly flow for the HC diet. Gly is one of the predominant AA in bile acids (34) and whereas most of the bile salt conjugates are reabsorbed after intestinal bacteria hydrolysis, substantial amounts of deconjugated Gly escape reabsorption and are thus discarded after digesta ultrafiltration (30). The overall degree of underestimation of endogenous N is, however, likely to be low in our study, because only 7% of the TN was removed in UF digesta, whereas previous studies reported values of 13–24% (27,33,35).
The present findings suggest that gut endogenous protein losses are increased by peptides derived from casein but not by free AA. This presumably results from lower reabsorption and/or higher secretions of endogenous N and AA. The activity of the L-AA transporters or the di-/tri-peptide transporters, regulated through complex mechanisms, is possibly influenced by dietary AA and N after several days of feeding (36,37). However, a similar brush border AA and peptide uptake was reported in mice fed for 14 d diets based on peptides or free AA, both simulating casein (38). The higher endogenous protein losses induced by dietary peptides are more likely due to enhanced proteic secretions. Endogenous protein losses are composed mainly of mucins, enzymatic secretions, sloughed cells, and bacteria (technically nondietary rather than endogenous) (39). Dietary peptides are known to stimulate pancreatic secretions more effectively than do free AA (40,41) and the degree of AA polymerization has been shown to influence small bowel mucosa growth rate (42–45). A higher distal (but not proximal) gut growth rate has been observed in rats fed for 10 d a diet based on casein-derived peptides compared with rats fed a free AA-based diet (42). This would theoretically result in higher mucosa sloughing and possibly higher ileal endogenous N losses in rats fed dietary peptides. However, a lower rate of mitosis per crypt was observed in the jejunum from rats fed for 4 d diets based on whey-derived peptides compared with free AA (43). Recently, bioactive peptides, such as ß-casomorphins (0.5–1 kDa MW), have been shown to induce mucus secretion in rat jejunum (46). Bioactivity, however, is related to the size and nature of the peptide (47) and is likely affected by protein hydrolysis conditions. There may be specific effects of dietary peptides from a prehydrolyzed protein vs. peptides naturally released during casein digestion (31).
This work demonstrates that feeding dietary peptides induces increased endogenous ileal N and AAFL compared with feeding a PF diet or diets containing only free AA, which yield similar estimates of endogenous ileal NFL and AAFL. This suggests that EAAFL and ENFL are not influenced by body N balance per se but rather by the presence of dietary peptides in the gut lumen. Further investigation is required to determine whether this is a specific effect of dietary peptides compared with peptides released during protein digestion in the gut and if this is a specific effect of casein-derived peptides. The underlying mechanisms need to be understood.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosures: A. Deglaire, P. J. Moughan, S. M. Rutherfurd, C. Bos, and D. Tomé, no conflicts of interest. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used: A1, free amino acid-based diet 1; A2, free amino acid-based diet 2; AA, amino acid; AAFL, amino acid flow;
-AN,
-amino nitrogen; AID, apparent ileal digestibility; BW, bodyweight; DEB, dietary electrolyte balance; DMI, dry matter intake; EAAFL, endogenous amino acid flow; ENFL, endogenous nitrogen flow; HC, hydrolyzed casein-based diet; MW, molecular weight; NFL, nitrogen flow; PF, protein-free diet; SID, standardized ileal digestibility; TN, total nitrogen; UF, ultrafiltration. ![]()
Manuscript received 18 May 2007. Initial review completed 28 June 2007. Revision accepted 23 August 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Gaudichon C, Bos C, Morens C, Petzke KJ, Mariotti F, Everwand J, Benamouzig R, Dare S, Tome D, et al. Ileal losses of nitrogen and amino acids in humans and their importance to the assessment of amino acid requirements. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:50–9.[Medline]
2. Moughan PJ, Butts CA, Rowan AM, Deglaire A. Dietary peptides increase endogenous amino acid losses from the gut in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:1359–65.
3. FAO/WHO. Report of the join FAO/WHO expert consultation on protein quality evaluation. Rome: FAO; 1990.
4. Low AG. Nutrient absorption in pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 1980;31:1087–130.[Medline]
5. Millward DJ, Garlick PJ. The energy cost of growth. Proc Nutr Soc. 1976;35:339–49.[Medline]
6. Butts CA, Moughan PJ, Smith WC, Carr DH. Endogenous lysine and other amino-acid flows at the terminal ileum of the growing pig (20 Kg bodyweight): the effect of protein-free, synthetic amino-acid, peptide and protein alimentation. J Sci Food Agric. 1993;61:31–40.
7. Darragh AJ, Moughan PJ, Smith WC. The effect of amino-acid and peptide alimentation on the determination of endogenous amino-acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat. J Sci Food Agric. 1990;51:47–56.
8. Skilton GA, Moughan PJ, Smith WC. Determination of endogenous amino-acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat. J Sci Food Agric. 1988;44:227–35.
9. Moughan PJ, Darragh AJ, Smith WC, Butts CA. Perchloric and trichloroacetic acids as precipitants of protein in endogenous ileal digesta from the rat. J Sci Food Agric. 1990;52:13–21.
10. Hodgkinson SM, Moughan PJ, Reynolds GW, James KAC. The effect of dietary peptide concentration on endogenous ileal amino acid loss in the growing pig. Br J Nutr. 2000;83:421–30.[Medline]
11. Rerat A, Corring T, Laplace JP. Protein digestion and absorption. In: Cole DJA, Boorman KN, Buttery PJ, Lewis D, Neale RJ, Swan H, editors. Protein metabolism and nutrition; 1976. University of Nottingham: European Association for Animal Production No. 16; 1976. p. 97–138.
12. Butts CA, Moughan PJ, Smith WC. Endogenous amino-acid flow at the terminal ileum of the rat determined under conditions of peptide alimentation. J Sci Food Agric. 1991;55:175–87.
13. NRC. Nutrient requirements of the laboratory rat. Nutrient requirements of laboratory animals. 4th ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
14. Mahe S, Fauquant J, Gaudichon C, Roos N, Maubois JL, Tome D. N-15 labeling and preparation of milk, casein and whey proteins. Lait. 1994;74;4:307–12.
15. Deglaire A, Moughan PJ, Bos C, Tome D. Commercial Phaseolus vulgaris extract (starch stopper) increases ileal endogenous amino acid and crude protein losses in the growing rat. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:5197–202.[Medline]
16. Hodgkinson SM, Souffrant WB, Moughan PJ. Comparison of the enzyme-hydrolyzed casein, guanidination, and isotope dilution methods for determining ileal endogenous protein flow in the growing rat and pig. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:2525–34.
17. Gausseres N, Mahe S, Benamouzig R, Luengo C, Ferriere F, Rautureau J, Tome D. 15N-Labeled pea flour protein nitrogen exhibits good ileal digestibility and postprandial retention in humans. J Nutr. 1997;127:1160–5.
18. AOAC. AOAC 994.12. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed, 2nd rev. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2003.
19. Moore S. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J Biol Chem. 1963;238:235–7.
20. Short FJ, Gorton P, Wiseman J, Boorman KN. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;59:215–21.
21. Fecher PA, Goldmann I, Nagengast A. Determination of iodine in food samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after alkaline extraction. J Anal At Spectrom. 1998;13:977–82.
22. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CF. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:172–80.
23. Donkoh A, Moughan PJ, Morel PCH. Comparison of methods to determine the endogenous amino-acid flow at the terminal ileum of the growing rat. J Sci Food Agric. 1995;67:359–66.
24. Rutherfurd SM, Moughan PJ. The digestible amino acid composition of several milk proteins: application of a new bioassay. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:909–17.[Abstract]
25. Haydon KD, West JW. Effect of dietary electrolyte balance on nutrient digestibility determined at the end of the small intestine and over the total digestive tract in growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 1990;68:3687–93.[Abstract]
26. James KA, Butts CA, Koolaard JP, Donaldson HE, Scott MF, Moughan PJ. The effect of feeding regimen on apparent and true ileal nitrogen digestibility for rats fed diets containing different sources of protein. J Sci Food Agric. 2002;82:1050–60.
27. Leterme P, Monmart T, Thewis A, Morandi P. Effect of oral and parenteral N nutrition vs N-free nutrition on the endogenous amino acid flow at the Ileum of the pig. J Sci Food Agric. 1996;71:265–71.
28. Delange CFM, Sauer WC, Souffrant W. The effect of protein status of the pig on the recovery and amino-acid composition of endogenous protein in digesta collected from the distal ileum. J Anim Sci. 1989;67:755–62.
29. Hendriks WH, Sritharan K, Hodgkinson SM. Comparison of the endogenous ileal and faecal amino acid excretion in the dog (Canis familiaris) and the rat (Rattus rattus) determined under protein-free feeding and peptide alimentation. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2002;86:333–41.[Medline]
30. Rutherfurd SM, Moughan PJ. The rat as a model animal for the growing pig in determining ileal amino acid digestibility in soya and milk proteins. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2003;87:292–300.[Medline]
31. Yin YL, Huang RL, Libao-Mercado AJ, Jeaurond EA, de Lange CFM, Rademacher M. Effect of including purified jack bean lectin in casein or hydrolysed casein-based diets on apparent and true ileal amino acid digestibility in the growing pig. Anim Sci. 2004;79:283–91.
32. Steendam CA, Tamminga S, Boer H, de Jong EJ, Visser GH, Verstegen MW. Ileal endogenous nitrogen recovery is increased and its amino acid pattern is altered in pigs fed quebracho extract. J Nutr. 2004;134:3076–82.
33. Moughan PJ, Schuttert G, Leenaars M. Endogenous amino acid flow in the stomach and small intestine of the young growing pig. J Sci Food Agric. 1992;60:437–42.
34. Juste C. Apports endogenes pas les secretions digestive chez le porc. In: Laplace JP, Corring T, Rerat A, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, editor. Physiologie Digestive chez le Porc. Paris: INRA; 1982. p. 155–73.
35. Butts CA, Moughan PJ, Smith WC. Protein nitrogen, peptide nitrogen and free amino-acid nitrogen in endogenous digesta nitrogen at the terminal ileum of the rat. J Sci Food Agric. 1992;59:291–8.
36. Daniel H. Molecular and integrative physiology of intestinal peptide transport. Annu Rev Physiol. 2004;66:361–84.[Medline]
37. Kilberg MS, Stevens BR, Novak DA. Recent advances in mammalian amino-acid-transport. Annu Rev Nutr. 1993;13:137–65.[Medline]
38. Ferraris RP, Kwan WW, Diamond J. Regulatory signals for intestinal amino-acid transporters and peptidases. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:G151–7.[Medline]
39. Fauconneau G, Michel MC. The role of the gastrointestinal tract in the regulation of protein metabolism. In: Munro HN, Allison JB, editors. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press; 1970. p. 481–522.
40. Temler RS, Dormond CA, Simon E, Morel B, Mettraux C. Response of rat pancreatic proteases to dietary proteins, their hydrolysates and soybean trypsin inhibitor. J Nutr. 1984;114:270–8.
41. Puigserver A, Wicker C, Gaucher C. Adaptation of pancreatic and intestinal hydrolysases to dietary changes. In: Desnuelle P, Sjostrom H, Noren O, editors. Molecular and cellular basis of digestion. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1982. p. 113–24.
42. Zaloga GP, Ward KA, Prielipp RC. Effect of enteral diets on whole-body and gut growth in unstressed rats. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991;15:42–7.
43. Poullain MG, Cezard JP, Marche C, Roger L, Mendy F, Broyart JP. Dietary whey proteins and their peptides or amino acids: effects on the jejunal mucosa of starved rats. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;49:71–6.
44. Stoll B, Price PT, Reeds PJ, Chang X, Henry JF, van Goudoever JB, Holst JJ, Burrin DG. Feeding an elemental diet vs a milk-based formula does not decrease intestinal mucosal growth in infant pigs. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30:32–9.
45. Guay F, Donovan SM, Trottier NL. Biochemical and morphological developments are partially impaired in intestinal mucosa from growing pigs fed reduced-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1749–60.
46. Claustre J, Toumi F, Trompette A, Jourdan G, Guignard H, Chayvialle JA, Plaisancie P. Effects of peptides derived from dietary proteins on mucus secretion in rat jejunum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;283:G521–8.
47. Froetschel MA. Bioactive peptides in digesta that regulate gastrointestinal function and intake. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:2500–8.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Deglaire, P. J. Moughan, C. Bos, K. Petzke, S. M. Rutherfurd, and D. Tome A Casein Hydrolysate Does Not Enhance Gut Endogenous Protein Flows Compared with Intact Casein When Fed to Growing Rats J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 556 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||