![]() |
|
|
3 Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; 4 USDA/Agricultural Research Service Clinical Nutrition Research Center, Houston, TX 77030; and 5 Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sabrams{at}bcm.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
900 mg/d, responded to the ITF with an increased calcium absorption of at least 3%. In responders, absorption increased from 22.7 ± 11.3% to 31.0 ± 15.3%. Colonic absorption, defined as absorption that occurred >7 h after oral dosing, represented 69.6 ± 18.6% of the increase, or 49 ± 28 mg/d. These findings suggest that, in those who respond to ITF, its effects on calcium absorption occur principally in the colon. This benefit to ITF may be especially important when absorption in the small intestine is impaired for anatomic or physiological reasons.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The time course of calcium absorption in humans has been measured in 1 study performed using radioactive calcium (9). In that study, calcium absorption in the colon began
7 h after the oral dose and represented
4% of total calcium absorption. Absorption of the calcium tracer was >99% complete by 23 h following oral tracer ingestion (9).
It is currently feasible to conduct such kinetic studies using stable isotopes and frequent serum collections. We chose to use this approach to evaluate the relative time course of increased calcium absorption associated with ITF use and to infer the approximate proportion of the increase that occurred in the colon (i.e. >7 h after isotope administration). We hypothesized that we would identify a significant increase in the level of an orally administered calcium stable isotope in serum samples collected between 7 and 26 h after oral dosing, reflecting increased colonic-phase calcium absorption.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects underwent a baseline stable isotope study including calcium absorption and kinetics (see below). After completion of this study, they began 8 g/d for 8 wk of an ITF that has previously been shown to increase calcium absorption (1–5) (Beneo Synergy1, Orafti). A repeat study was performed at the end of that time period. Subjects continued to receive the ITF until 2 d after this study. Subjects were enrolled until a total of 8 subjects were identified who responded with a 3.0% or greater increase in calcium absorption in response to 8-wk consumption of the ITF. Due to the large number of samples generated, oral tracer kinetics were subsequently analyzed only for those 8 subjects. The 3.0% cut-off had been predetermined a priori as the definition of a responder, based on our previous studies in adolescents (4). We expected to need to perform the study in 11–14 subjects to find 8 responders based on a response rate of 66% in our studies in adolescents (3,4). Ultimately, we studied 13 subjects to identify the 8 responders (62% response rate). No subjects withdrew due to intolerance of the ITF.
Calcium absorption and kinetic methods. A stable isotope of calcium, 42Ca (8 mg), was given orally with a standardized breakfast meal that provided a total of 300 mg of calcium. The 42Ca isotope was mixed into 120 mL of calcium and vitamin D-fortified orange juice. A second isotope, 46Ca (10 µg) was administered intravenously 2 h after the oral isotope. These isotopes were selected due to the speed and relative ease of analyzing large groups of serum samples for 42Ca by ICP.
Serum samples were obtained for enrichment of the 42Ca at 30-min intervals for the first 3 h after dosing, then hourly for the next 5 h, and then every 2 h until the end of the study. The final serum sample was collected 24 h after the i.v. dose (26 h after the oral dose). Isotope enrichment in all serum samples was determined using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) MS. The final serum sample was also analyzed for enrichment of 46Ca (using thermal ionization MS). The 48-h urine pools were analyzed for 42Ca and 46Ca enrichment by thermal ionization MS. Sample preparation and analytical details were identical to those we reported previously in our earlier investigations (2,4,10).
Subjects were maintained on diets with
800–1000 mg/d calcium intake (target mean of 900 mg/d) throughout the study period. Dietary control began 10 d before the first study and continued throughout the study with extensive interaction with the study dietitian. Weighed 3-d diets were conducted at both visits and the calcium intake reported is the mean of the 2 3-d diets.
Calculations. The actual total increase in calcium absorption attributable to the ITF was determined from the 48-h urine samples (Eq. 1).
The total area under the curve (AUC) (the product of time and dose-corrected enrichment) was calculated using a rhomboid approximation based on the isotopic enrichment in the blood samples. For each subject, the cumulative increase in the AUC at the last time point of the study (Eq. 2) was set as the value in which 100% of the benefit for that subject had occurred. At each serum sample time point, the proportion of that 100% attributable to the increased AUC was determined.
This information was used to determine the relative proportion of post-ITF increase in calcium absorption that was attributable to increased absorption in the small vs. large intestine by determining the proportion absorbed in the first 7 h (Eq. 3) (9). We assumed that any effect after >7 h occurred in the colon (Eq. 4 and 5).
Equations used to calculate presumed effect of ITF on colonic calcium absorption.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | (Eq. 1) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | (Eq. 2) |
![]() | (Eq. 3) |
![]() | (Eq. 4) |
![]() | (Eq. 5) |
Note that the 7-h length was arbitrarily assigned based on earlier data (9). The relative incremental benefit could similarly be determined for any time length.
Sample size determination and statistical analysis.
Barger-Lux et al. (9) reported that 4.2% of calcium absorption occurs in the colon. We anticipated a SD of that value similar to the population SD for total calcium absorption of
30% of the mean percent absorption (3,4). Based on intakes of 900 mg/d and absorption of 35%, the total absorption would therefore be 315 mg/d with 4.2% of that or 13 mg in the colon. We estimated a SD of 30% of the mean (i.e. colonic absorption of 13 ± 4 mg/d). We hypothesized a mean increase in calcium absorption of 5% after 8 wk of the ITF to 40% (360 mg/d), of which 80% of the increase (0.8·45 mg/d = 36 mg/d) would be colonic. Therefore, we hypothesized that colonic absorption would increase by 36 ± 11 mg/d after 8 wk of ITF. A sample size of 8 had a power >0.9 to detect such a difference (P < 0.05) from 0 in total daily calcium absorbed in the colon.
Comparisons of groups were made by paired t tests using SPSS 13.0 for Windows.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Results for the mean AUC of the 8 subjects before and after ITF are shown in Figure 1. The difference in AUC is shown in Figure 2 and demonstrates a difference (P < 0.05) by 120 min. Of importance is to consider the time course of the AUC. The relative amount of the total AUC achieved by 7 h, for example, was essentially identical at 32% in the pre-ITF group and 33% in the post-ITF group. This demonstrates there was no change in relative rate of absorption by ITF during that time span. In an evaluation of the completion of calcium absorption in responders performed by comparing the absorption at 24 h (from the blood) and that at 48 h (from urine), the blood value at 24 h represented
98% of the final absorption.
|
|
750 min (12.5 h) after the oral dose was given (time-dependent mean proportion of benefit to ITF is shown in Fig. 3). Using the approximation that absorption becomes colonic after 7 h of the oral dose, we calculated the relative increase associated with the colon (results in Table 3) for each responder. Overall, from this model, 70% of the benefit was associated with colonic phase absorption.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results are in agreement with the first 2 predictions and are very close to the last prediction. That is, a significant increase in calcium absorption from the colon occurred and the proportion of overall ITF benefit that could be attributed to the colon was
70%. This study was the first to our knowledge to evaluate these issues in humans. The net increased colonic absorption of 49 mg/d was higher than our prestudy estimate of 36 mg/d (Table 3). The use of the 7-h time period to determine colonic absorption is based on a previous kinetic study in adults.
We found no evidence for a time shift in calcium absorption in responders. No single time point is an absolute for all subjects in determining colonic phase absorption, but the fundamental results of this study are not substantially affected by the use of slightly different values. That is, if colonic absorption occurred after 4 h, then it would have
80% and if after 10 h, it would have
60%.
As outlined by Cashman (11) and Scholz-Ahrens et al. (6), mechanisms of increased absorption include but are not limited to the following: 1) increased passive absorption in the colon due to increased solubility of calcium associated with pH and microbial changes in the colon; 2) direct effect of short-chain fatty acids in increasing transcellular calcium absorption; and 3) increased cell growth and adaptive surface area in the small and large intestine. Similar hypotheses were generated based on studies in rats by Raschka and Daniel (12), who considered the possibility that ITF could affect calbindin or other transcellular absorption-related proteins. In Caco-2 human intestinal cells, a 300–400% increase in paracellular calcium absorption was associated with ITF (13).
Our findings indicate that although the hypothesized mechanisms for increased colonic absorption, such as increased colonic solubility of calcium, are the predominant mechanisms involved in the ITF effect in responders, whole gut mechanisms must also be involved. In this regard, it is important to remember that in humans, calcium absorption primarily occurs in the upper portion of the small intestine compared with the large intestine in rats.
We did not evaluate how variations of calcium intake affected the ITF effect. In previous studies, we did not find a relationship between intake and ITF benefit, but we have found that those with lower absorption efficiency have a greater ITF benefit (1). It is likely that at very low calcium intakes, absorption efficiency is likely high and less calcium is presented to the colon to be absorbed. However, in the elderly or those with lower absorptive efficiency, a benefit even at very low intakes might be present. This possibility should be subject to experimental confirmation.
This study was specifically not designed to evaluate the issue of overall response or responders vs. nonresponders. We have shown in our previous studies that about two-thirds of individuals are responders. The reasons that some respond and others do not may be related to genetic differences (4) or unidentified dietary factors (5). Larger studies in adults, preferably using DEXA as an outcome to look at specific bone sites, should be conducted to evaluate these effects.
This study provided confirmation that the animal studies, which had identified a benefit of ITF for calcium absorption, accurately identified the principal mechanisms as well. However, given the multiple methods by which ITF acts, it is not surprising that some human subjects have a much greater response than others. Our results demonstrate that in those individuals who respond to ITF, its effects primarily occur in the colon. Thus, a benefit of ITF may be especially important when absorption in the small intestine is impaired due to anatomic or physiological abnormalities. Furthermore, understanding the site of action may be helpful in considering the effects of ITF and related products on the absorption of other minerals or on the design of other ITF products.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosures: S. A. Abrams, K. M. Hawthorne, O. Aliu, P. D. Hicks, Z. Chen, and I. J. Griffin, no conflicts of interest. ![]()
6 Abbreviations used: AUC, area under curve; ICP, inductively-coupled plasma; ITF, inulin-type fructan. ![]()
Manuscript received 23 April 2007. Initial review completed 1 June 2007. Revision accepted 10 July 2007.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Griffin IJ, Davila PM, Abrams SA. Non-digestible oligosaccharides and calcium absorption in girls with adequate calcium intakes. Br J Nutr. 2002;87:S187–91.[Medline]
2. Griffin IJ, Hicks PMD, Heaney RP, Abrams SA. Enhanced chicory inulin increases calcium absorption mainly in adolescents with lower calcium absorption. Nutr Res. 2003;23:901–3.
3. Abrams SA, Griffin IJ, Hawthorne KM, Liang L, Gunn SK, Darlington G, Ellis KJ. A combination of prebiotic short-and long-chain inulin-type fructans enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralization in young adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:471–6.
4. Abrams SA, Griffin IJ, Hawthorne KM. Young adolescents who respond to an inulin-type fructan (ITF) substantially increase total absorbed calcium and daily calcium accretion to the skeleton. J Nutr. In press 2007.
5. Holloway L, Moynihan S, Abrams SA, Kent K, Hsu AR, Friedlander AL. Effects of oligofructose enriched inulin on calcium and magnesium intestinal absorption and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:365–72.[Medline]
6. Scholz-Ahrens KE, Ade P, Marten B, Weber P, Timm W, Açil Y, Glüer CC, Schrezenmeir J. Prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics affect mineral absorption, bone mineral content, and bone structure. J Nutr. 2007;137:S838–46.
7. Ohta A, Ohtsuki M, Baba S, Adachi T, Sakata T, Sakaguchi E. Calcium and magnesium absorption from the colon and rectum are increased in rats fed fructooligosaccharides. J Nutr. 1995;125:2417–24.
8. Mineo H, Hara H, Shigematsu N, Okuhara Y, Tomita F. Melibiose, difructose anhydride III and difructose anhydride IV enhance net calcium absorption in rat small and large intestinal epithelium by increasing the passage of tight junctions in vitro. J Nutr. 2002;132:3394–9.
9. Barger-Lux MJ, Heaney RP, Recker RR. Time course of calcium absorption in humans: evidence for a colonic component. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989;44:308–11.[Medline]
10. Chen Z, Griffin IJ, Kriseman YL, Liang LK, Abrams SA. ICP-MS analysis of calcium isotopes from human serum: a low sample volume acid equilibration method. Clin Chem. 2003;49:2050–5.
11. Cashman KD. A prebiotic substance persistently enhances intestinal calcium absorption and increases bone mineralization in young adolescents. Nutr Rev. 2006;64:189–96.[Medline]
12. Raschka L, Daniel H. Mechanisms underlying the effects of inulin-type fructans on calcium absorption in the large intestine of rats. Bone. 2005;37:728–35.[Medline]
13. Suzuki T, Hara H. Various nondigestible saccharides open a paracellular calcium transport pathway with the induction of intracellular calcium signaling in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. J Nutr. 2004;134:1935–41.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Morris, K. M. Hawthorne, T. Hotze, S. A. Abrams, and K. D. Hirschi Nutritional impact of elevated calcium transport activity in carrots PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1431 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||