![]() |
|
|
3 Department of Public Health and 4 Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 5 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Liver Research Center, Basovizza (Trieste), Italy; 6 Department of Food Science and Technology, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Milan, Italy; and 7 Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nicoletta.pellegrini{at}unipr.it.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
= 0.49 for TEAC, 0.53 for TRAP, and 0.49 for FRAP; P < 0.0001) and proved reasonably accurate to classify individuals into quartiles of TAC intake. The FFQ had a good repeatability when readministered after 1 y in 55 subjects (quadratic-weighted
for intertertile agreement = 0.66 for TEAC, 0.70 for TRAP and 0.68 for FRAP; P < 0.0001). With both dietary instruments, the main contributors to TAC intake were coffee and tea in women and alcoholic beverages in men, followed by fruits and vegetables in both sexes. Plasma TAC and dietary TAC were not associated. In conclusion, our FFQ has the potential for being used to rank subjects on the basis of their antioxidant intake as determined by dietary TAC in large epidemiological studies. The FFQ should be validated in external populations before being used for research purposes.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plant foods contain many hundreds of compounds with antioxidant activity, including ascorbic acid and tocopherols, carotenoids, and a wide variety of antioxidant phytochemicals such as simple phenolics and flavonoids (6). Because the concentration of single antioxidants may not reflect the total antioxidant power of food, the concept of total antioxidant capacity (TAC)8 was introduced (7).
TAC takes into account the antioxidant activity of single compounds present in food or biological samples as well as their potential synergistic and redox interactions. Several assays are available for measuring TAC, differing for chemistry (generation of different radicals and/or target molecules) and for the way endpoints are measured. To consider the major redox reactions that commonly happen in human body, 3 methods, i.e., Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) (8), total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP) (9), and ferric reducing-antioxidant power (FRAP) (10), were selected.
The great potential of TAC for epidemiological and clinical applications seems strengthened by the fact that dietary TAC may provide protection against gastric cancer and inflammatory processes (11,12). For dietary TAC to be used in such studies, simple and reliable instruments have to be developed for its assessment. The FFQ is the obvious choice for assessing food and nutrient intake in epidemiological studies (13), and thus we developed and validated a FFQ for dietary TAC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On subjects' initial visit, a fasting venous blood sample was taken to determine antioxidant markers, and an oral glucose tolerance test was administered, providing 75 g of glucose, to exclude a diagnosis of diabetes (15). During this 1st visit, the FFQ was administered to the subjects by an expert dietician to assess the 3-mo food habits preceding the beginning of the study. Subjects were then instructed to fill in a 3-d weighed food record (3D-WR).
FFQ design and validation.
A food list for the major dietary sources of TAC in the Italian diet was obtained by analyzing 1125 24-h dietary recalls from the Varese cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) (16). These recalls listed a total of 1081 different foods. For 713 of these items, a TAC value was then assigned as based on previously published databases (17,18) or laboratory data. Then, the food list for the FFQ was extracted with the aim of covering at least 95% of the variance of TAC intake and energy intake in the original population. The percentage of TAC contributed by each food (f) was calculated as follows:
![]() |
The above equation was estimated by the following, as proposed by Block et al. (19):
![]() |
where Q = g of food consumed, D = TAC/g of food, j = 1...1125 subjects, and i = 1...1081 foods.
The final food list comprised 150 foods and was translated into 53 questions. Food frequency was coded as daily, weekly, and monthly, and from 1 to 6 occasions (e.g., twice a day, 5 times per week, 6 times per month) and the FFQ was intended to cover a period of the previous 3 mo of food intake. Portion sizes were estimated using 3 different pictures (A, B, and C; with A illustrating the smallest portion and C the biggest portion) for 33 foods or courses from a photographic atlas developed for the Italian population (20).
For food groups whose single items have remarkably different antioxidant capacity (e.g., fruits and vegetables) and for which daily intake is usually overestimated (13,21), a question about overall intake was asked and then qualitative questions (never, sometimes, often) related to the frequency of consuming single items were additionally asked. The intake of single food items in specific food groups was obtained by weighing the overall intake as determined by answers to qualitative questions for single items.
In addition, the questionnaire included questions on the quality of selected foods; for instance, caffeinated vs. decaffeinated coffee and whole-grain vs. refined cereals. Moreover, additional questions were related to complex dishes rich in TAC (i.e., pasta and rice with tomato sauce or with vegetable sauce, vegetable soup, soup with beans, chickpeas, or lentils, tomato/cheese and vegetarian pizza), whose recipes were compiled on the basis of 24-h dietary recalls from the Varese cohort. The TAC of recipes were estimated on the basis of the TAC of the single ingredients and their actual weight in the recipe.
The FFQ was administered by an expert dietitian who entered the data directly into a Microsoft Excel application. The application was designed to calculate TAC directly during FFQ compilation. To obtain this, a database of TAC values of raw foods was linked to the FFQ application. Approximately 150 items among fruits, vegetables, oils and beverages (17), and among cereals and cereal products, pulses, nuts and processed foods (18) were analyzed. The TAC values were obtained applying 3 different assays: 1) TEAC assay (22), 2) TRAP assay (9), and 3) FRAP assay (10), as previously described (17). The computer output consisted of the mean daily TAC of the overall diet and was also split into 20 food categories (fruits, vegetables, pulses, alcoholic beverages, coffees and teas, cereals, oils and fats, salad dressings, sweets and dairy, pizza, fruit juices, nuts, chocolates, breads, biscuits, potatoes, spices, cakes, soft drinks and sauces).
The FFQ repeatability was evaluated 1 y after the initial administration in 55 subjects.
3D-WR. The 3D-WR was chosen as the reference method because it is reliable in measuring food intake and because its estimation errors are usually not correlated with those made in the FFQ (21). The study dietitian trained participants to complete the 3D-WR, which included all foods, beverages, and supplements consumed during 2 nonconsecutive working days plus a weekend day. Subjects were asked to weigh all food and drinks consumed and to provide a detailed description of each food, including methods of preparation and recipes whenever possible. All subjects completed the 3D-WR within 1 wk of their first visit. The study dietitian reviewed the 3D-WR with participants to check for errors or omissions and to estimate the portions of foods eaten outside the home using a book of photographs and standard household measures. Nutrient and TAC intake was calculated by a Microsoft Access application linked to the food database of the European Institute of Oncology (EIO), covering >700 Italian foods (23) and our TAC database (see above). To assign a value to TAC-containing foods not directly analyzed, we applied the following criteria: 1) for dry and canned foods, the TAC values of fresh foods were converted on the basis of the moisture content specified by the EIO database and vice versa and, 2) if no data were available for a given food item, the data for a similar food item (e.g., same botanical group) were used as proxy. The computer output of 3D-WR gave the mean daily TAC, the TAC from the 20 food categories described above for the FFQ, and the macro- and micronutrient content of the diet for each subject.
Plasma TAC assessment. Blood samples for plasma antioxidant analysis were collected in vacutainers containing EDTA-Na and were centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Plasma was transferred to Eppendorfs and stored at 80°C until measurement, which was performed the day immediately after collection. TAC was measured by means of TEAC and FRAP high throughput assays, as described by Bompadre et al. (24) and Benzie and Strain (10), respectively. The plasma samples were not analyzed using the TRAP assay due to the lack of an available high throughput technique, which did not allow analyzing samples immediately after collection.
Statistical analysis.
Of the 299 subjects who agreed to participate in the study, 285 (95%) had all the data needed for analysis. For plasma TAC analysis, 282 samples were analyzed for TEAC and 244 for FRAP. Characteristics of subjects were given as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) because of very skewed distributions. Wilcoxon's test, Spearman's
, quadratic-weighted
values were calculated to measure interquartile agreement between FFQ and 3D-WR measures of TEAC, TRAP and FRAP assays. To measure the value of gross misclassification, the percentage of subjects into the same quartile or within one quartile was calculated (2527). The same procedure was used to test the relation between plasma values of TEAC and FRAP and dietary intake as assessed by the FFQ and 3D-WR. We also tested whether gender, age, BMI, and energy intake influenced the probability of being classified by the FFQ in the same or within one quartile of the 3D-WR using a logistic regression model where age, BMI, and energy were evaluated as quartiles. To assess repeatability of the FFQ after 1 y, Spearman's
inter-tertile agreement using quadratic-weighted
was performed. Significance was set to a value of P < 0.05 for all tests. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 9.1 (STATA Corp.).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
, test and retest correlation values after 1 y were 0.66 for TEAC, 0.70 for TRAP, and 0.68 for FRAP (P < 0.0001). The corresponding values of quadratic-weighted
for inter-tertile agreement were 0.57, 0.68, and 0.59, respectively (P < 0.0001).
Validation of FFQ against 3D-WR.
FFQ estimates of TEAC, TRAP, and FRAP were higher than those given by the 3D-WR (Wilcoxon's test, P < 0.0001; see Table 1). The degree of association between FFQ and 3D-WR estimates was moderate (Spearman's
= 0.52 for TEAC;
= 0.58 for TRAP, and
= 0.52 for FRAP; P < 0.00001), as defined by Landis and Koch (28). The interquartile agreement, determined by quadratic-weighted
, was 0.49 for TEAC, 0.53 for TRAP, and 0.49 for FRAP (P < 0.0001) (Supplemental Tables 13). When the FFQ was compared with the 3D-WR, using the percentage of subjects in the same or within one quartile, TEAC, TRAP, and FRAP identified correctly 81, 83, and 81% of cases, respectively, and the classification in opposite quartiles was rare (2, 1, and 1%, respectively). We also tested whether gender, age, BMI, and energy intake affected the probability of classification in the same or within one quartile using a logistic regression model where age, BMI, and energy were evaluated as quartiles (models not shown). None of these potential confounders was associated to the outcome of interest, with P-values for the likelihood ratio ranging from 0.0516 for age in the TRAP model to 0.8795 for age in the TEAC model.
Association between plasma and dietary TAC tools.
There was no association between the 3D-WR values and those of plasma for TEAC (
= 0.046, P = 0.44, n = 282), and there was only a trivial association for FRAP (
= 0.13, P = 0.04, n = 244). Moreover, the quadratic-weighted
values for interquartile agreement were not significant for TEAC (
= 0.01, P = 0.41) and only marginally significant for FRAP (
= 0.12, P = 0.03). The number of subjects within the same quartile or within one quartile was 64% for TEAC and 57% for FRAP.
There was no association between the FFQ values and those of plasma for TEAC (
= 0.11, P = 0.07, n = 282) and only a trivial association for FRAP (
= 0.17, P = 0.008, n = 244). Moreover, the quadratic-weighted
values for interquartile agreement were not significant for TEAC (
= 0.08, P = 0.06) and FRAP (
= 0.19, P = 0.06). The number of subjects within the same quartile or within one quartile was 65% for TEAC and 59% for FRAP.
The daily intakes of food groups and their contribution to TAC intake. In the overall population, estimated intakes for 11 of 20 food groups in the FFQ were higher than those recorded in the 3D-WR (Table 2). Conversely, the FFQ estimate of fruit and pulses intake was lower than that estimated by 3D-WR and the intake of vegetables was comparable for both dietary tools. However, the percentage of contribution of the main food groups to TEAC, TRAP, and FRAP intake (Table 3 and Supplemental Tables 4 and 5), as determined by both the 3D-WR and the FFQ, was similar. Coffee and tea beverages were the main contributors to TAC intake in women, followed by alcoholic beverages, fruits, and vegetables. In men, the main contributors to TAC intake were alcoholic beverages followed by coffee and tea, fruits, and vegetables.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We validated our FFQ against a 3D-WR performed on different days of the week, which is considered a reference method for this kind of application (29). The FFQ estimate of TAC intake was significantly higher than that obtained from the 3D-WR. This may be partly due to under-reporting due to the 3D-WR (13). However, the FFQ and the 3D-WR estimates of TAC intake were significantly associated, regardless of the analytical method used to evaluate TAC in foods. More importantly, the classification in the same or within one quartile was satisfactory and the classification in opposite quartiles was rare. It should be pointed out that this degree of accuracy is comparable to that observed for most macronutrients (27). Contrary to what happens for most nutrients, we found no evidence that age, sex, BMI, and energy intake influence the agreement between FFQ and 3D-WR. Moreover, the test and retest study showed a good repeatability for the FFQ 1 y after its administration.
Even if this is the first validation study of a FFQ aimed at assessing dietary TAC, it has several limitations. First, a 3D-WR is clearly less adequate than a 7D- or 14D-WR to evaluate usual food intake. However, we administered the 3D-WR to our subjects on different days of the week over 6 mo. Thus, we expect that the 3D-WR has given an acceptable estimate of the food intake of the population during this period. Second, we investigated the food intake during the previous 3 mo. We choose to do this because fruits and vegetables, which are among the most important contributors of TAC, undergo seasonal variation. Moreover, there is evidence of poor performance for FFQs in investigating fruit and vegetable intake for longer periods (21).
After analyzing the daily intake of food groups obtained from both dietary tools, some conclusions can be drawn. First, the consumption of alcoholic beverages (
75% as red wine) is quite high in our population, especially in men, although similar to data collected using a FFQ in the EPIC centers of northern Italy (30). Second, the daily intakes of other food groups recorded by the FFQ developed are comparable with those reported in other Italian surveys (30,31). In addition, we determined the contribution of different food groups to TAC intake, which was similar for all 3 methods used to measure the TAC. However, a conclusion cannot be made regarding the most suitable assay for measuring the TAC of food because each assay measures different antioxidant mechanisms. In particular, the TEAC assay measures the ability of antioxidants to quench a radical cation in both lipophilic and hydrophilic environments (8), and the TRAP and FRAP assays evaluate the chain-breaking antioxidant potential (9) and the reducing power of the sample (10), respectively. Coffee and tea contributed between 37.9 and 54.3% of TAC intake in women and between 26.5 and 36.6% TAC intake in men, the variation of which depended upon the TAC assay and the tool used to assess food intake. The contribution of alcoholic beverages to TAC intake was between 11.3 and 15.3% in women and between 31.5 and 40.3% in men. The high contribution of the coffee and tea category to TAC in women is not surprising and is due to the high consumption of coffee in our study population. A large body of evidence supports the protective effect of coffee on the development of type 2 diabetes (32) and colon cancer in men as well as in women (33), and on the risk of premenopausal breast cancer (34). Moreover, the high contribution of coffee to TAC intake is in agreement with Svilaas et al. (35), who reported coffee as the major contributor (
64%) to TAC intake in 61 Norwegians. Conversely, wine intake contributed <5%. Interestingly, the mean intake of TAC reported in that group and expressed as FRAP (17.3 mmol/d) is in agreement with the TAC intake recorded by 3D-WR in our population.
We also measured plasma TAC by means of the methods used to measure food TAC (i.e., TEAC and FRAP). We did not find an association between dietary TAC (as determined by both the 3D-WR and the FFQ) and plasma TAC. These data clearly show that plasma values cannot be used as surrogate measurements for either short- or long-term dietary TAC intake. This result was not completely unexpected because the role of antioxidant-rich diets on the modulation of antioxidant plasma status is not yet clear. Many studies report the ability of diet to modulate plasma TAC after the acute consumption of antioxidant-rich foods (3638). To our knowledge, to date, only one epidemiologic study demonstrated a significant association (P < 0.01) between plasma TAC (measured by a colorimetric test) and the adherence to a Mediterranean diet (39). The existence of homeostatic mechanisms of regulation and the physiological diversity in absorption and disposal of antioxidants are variables that might affect the ability of diet to modulate plasma TAC in vivo. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that an association could emerge in a group larger than that studied in our investigation.
Although both the accuracy and the repeatability of the FFQ were acceptable, the fact that it was developed using a sample of Italian subjects with traditional, albeit "westernized" dietary habits, does not imply that it will perform equally well in subjects from different countries and with different dietary habits. Thus, it is important that the FFQ be cross-validated in external populations before being used as research tool.
In conclusion, using a FFQ with a well-defined food list, we developed a simpler and less expensive tool than a 3-d weighed food record for assessing dietary TAC intake. Our FFQ has the potential for being used to rank subjects on the basis of their antioxidant intake as determined by dietary TAC. Based on the contribution of food groups to the daily TAC intake, the estimation of dietary TAC provides additional information to the daily intake of fruit and vegetables, because it also considers the contribution of antioxidant-rich beverages such as wine and coffee.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 The number of individuals in cross-tabulations of the quartiles of FFQ and 3D-WR for TEAC, TRAP and FRAP intakes (Supplemental Tables 13) and the percentage contribution of food groups to TAC intake, as determined by TRAP and FRAP assays, in the 3D-WR and the FFQ (Supplemental Tables 4 and 5, respectively) are available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. ![]()
8 Abbreviations used: 3D-WR, 3-d weighed food record; FRAP, ferric reducing-antioxidant power; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TRAP, total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter. ![]()
9 To convert the values for creatinine to µmol/L, multiply by 88.4. ![]()
Manuscript received 31 July 2006. Initial review completed 25 August 2006. Revision accepted 27 October 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Hu FB. Plant-based foods and prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78: Suppl:544S51S.
2. Williams MT, Hord NG. The role of dietary factors in cancer prevention: beyond fruits and vegetables. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20:4519.
3. Gey KF, Puska P, Jordan P, Moser UK. Inverse correlation between plasma vitamin E and mortality from ischemic heart disease in cross-cultural epidemiology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53: Suppl:326S34S.
4. Gey KF. The antioxidant hypothesis of cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and mechanisms. Biochem Soc Trans. 1990;18:10415.[Medline]
5. Willett WC. Micronutrients and cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53: Suppl:265S9S.
6. Kaur C, Kapoor HC. Antioxidants in fruits and vegetables- the millenium's health. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2001;36:70325.
7. Serafini M, Del Rio D. Understanding the association between dietary antioxidants, redox status and disease: is the Total Antioxidant Capacity the right tool? Redox Rep. 2004;9:14552.[Medline]
8. Pellegrini N, Re R, Yang M, Rice-Evans CA. Screening of dietary carotenoids and carotenoid-rich fruit extracts for antioxidant activities applying the 2,2'-azonobis(3-ethylenebenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic) acid radical cation decolorization assay. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:37989.
9. Ghiselli A, Serafini M, Maiani G, Azzini E, Ferro-Luzzi A. A fluorescence-based method for measuring total plasma antioxidant capability. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995;18:2936.[Medline]
10. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay: direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:1527.[Medline]
11. Serafini M, Bellocco R, Wolk A, Ekstrom AM. Total antioxidant potential of fruit and vegetables and risk of gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:98591.[Medline]
12. Brighenti F, Valtuena S, Pellegrini N, Ardigo D, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Piatti P, Serafini M, Zavaroni I. Total antioxidant capacity of the diet is inversely and independently related to plasma concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in adult Italian subjects. Br J Nutr. 2005;93:61925.[Medline]
13. Pufulete M, Emery PW, Nelson M, Sanders TAB. Validation of a short food frequency questionnaire to assess folate intake. Br J Nutr. 2002;87:38390.[Medline]
14. Zavaroni I, Bonini L, Gasparini P, Barilli AL, Zuccarelli A, Dall'Aglio E, Delsignore R, Reaven GM. Hyperinsulinemia in a normal population as a predictor of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease: the Barilla factory revisited. Metabolism. 1999;48:98994.[Medline]
15. Alberti KG. Zimmet PZ for the WHO Consultation Group. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:53953.[Medline]
16. Pala V, Sieri S, Palli D, Salvini S, Berrino F, Bellegotti M, Frasca G, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, et al. Diet in the Italian EPIC cohorts: presentation of data and methodological issues. Tumori. 2003;89:594607.[Medline]
17. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Colombi B, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Bianchi M, Brighenti F. Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages, and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. J Nutr. 2003;133:28129.
18. Pellegrini N, Serafini M, Salvatore S, Del Rio D, Bianchi M, Brighenti F. Total antioxidant capacity of spices, dried fruits, nuts, pulses, cereals and sweets consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50:10308.[Medline]
19. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:45369.
20. Fidanza F, Gentile MG, Porrini M. A self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire with optical reading and its concurrent validation. Eur J Epidemiol. 1995;11:16370.[Medline]
21. Marks GC, Hughes MC, van der Pols JC. Relative validity of food intake estimates using a food frequency questionnaire is associated with sex, age, and other personal characteristic. J Nutr. 2006;136:45965.
22. Pellegrini N, Del Rio D, Colombi B, Bianchi M, Brighenti F. Application of the 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation assay to a flow injection system for the evaluation of antioxidant activity of some pure compounds and beverages. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2604.[Medline]
23. Salvini S. A food composition database for epidemiological studies in Italy. Cancer Lett. 1997;114:299300.[Medline]
24. Bompadre S, Leone L, Politi A, Battino M. Improved FIA-ABTS method for antioxidant capacity determination in different biological samples. Free Radic Res. 2004;38:8318.[Medline]
25. Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29:52736.[Medline]
26. Klohe DM, Clarke KK, George GC, Milani TJ, Hanss-Nuss H, Freeland-Graves J. Relative validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire for a triethnic population of 1-year-old to 3-year-old children from low-income families. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:72734.[Medline]
27. Willett W, editor. Nutritional epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
28. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical
-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:36374.[Medline]
29. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnairesa review. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:56787.[Medline]
30. Pisani P, Faggiano F, Krogh V, Palli D, Vineis P, Berrino F. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl:152S60S.
31. Turrini A, Saba A, Perrone D, Cialfa E, D'Amicis A. Food consumption patterns in Italy: the INN-CA Study 19941996. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:57188.[Medline]
32. van Dam RM, Hu FB. Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;294:97104.
33. Tavani A, La Vecchia C. Coffee, decaffeinated coffee, tea and cancer of the colon and rectum: a review of epidemiological studies, 19902003. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:74357.[Medline]
34. Baker JA, Beehler GP, Sawant AC, Jayaprakash V, McCann SE, Moysich KB. Consumption of coffee, but not black tea, is associated with decreased risk of premenopausal breast cancer. J Nutr. 2006;136:16671.
35. Svilaas A, Sarkhi AK, Andersen LF, Svilaas T, Strom EC, Jacobs DR, Jr., Ose L, Blomhoff R. Intakes of antioxidants in coffee, wine, and vegetables are correlated with plasma carotenoids in humans. J Nutr. 2004;134:5627.
36. Maxwell S, Cruickshank A, Thorpe G. Red wine and antioxidant activity in serum. Lancet. 1994;344:1934.[Medline]
37. Serafini M, Ghiselli A, Ferro-Luzzi A. Red wine, tea and antioxidants. Lancet. 1994;344:626.[Medline]
38. Pedersen CB, Kyle J, Jenkinson AM, Gardner PT, McPhail DB, Duthie GG. Effects of blueberry and cranberry juice consumption on the plasma antioxidant capacity of healthy female volunteers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54:4058.[Medline]
39. Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Tzima N, Chrysohoou C, Economou M, Zampelas A, Stefanadis C. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with total antioxidant capacity in healthy adults: the ATTICA study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:6949.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Rautiainen, M. Serafini, R. Morgenstern, R. L Prior, and A. Wolk The validity and reproducibility of food-frequency questionnaire-based total antioxidant capacity estimates in Swedish women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1247 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Valtuena, N. Pellegrini, L. Franzini, M. A Bianchi, D. Ardigo, D. Del Rio, P. Piatti, F. Scazzina, I. Zavaroni, and F. Brighenti Food selection based on total antioxidant capacity can modify antioxidant intake, systemic inflammation, and liver function without altering markers of oxidative stress Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1290 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sies Total Antioxidant Capacity: Appraisal of a Concept J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1493 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Chow and S.-J. Chang Value or Usefulness of the Food Frequency Questionnaire for the Assessment of Dietary Total Antioxidant Capacity J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1496 - 1497. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||