Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amiot, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amiot, M. J.
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:2368-2373, September 2006


Nutritional Epidemiology

Daily Polyphenol Intake in France from Fruit and Vegetables1

Pierre Brat2, Stéphane Georgé3, Annick Bellamy4, Laure Du Chaffaut5, Augustin Scalbert6, Louise Mennen7, Nathalie Arnault7 and Marie Josèphe Amiot8,9,10,*

2 Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), Département FLHOR, TA50/16, F-34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; 3 Centre Technique de la Conservation et des Produits Agricoles (CTCPA), F-84911 Avignon Cedex 9, France; 4 Centre Technique de l'Interprofession des Fruits et Légumes (CTIFL), Centre de Lanxade F-24130 Prigonrieux, France; 5 Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), 94701 Maisons Alfort, France; 6 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Maladies métaboliques et micronutriments (INRA-U3M), Centre de Theix, F-63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France; 7 UMR Inra/Inserm/Cnam, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Ile-de-France ISTNA/CNAM, F-75003 Paris, France; and 8 INSERM, 476 (Human Nutrition and Lipids), Marseille, F-13385 France; 9 INRA,1260, Marseille, F-13385 France; and 10 Universite Méditerranée Aix-Marseille 2, Faculté de Médecine, IPHM-IFR 125, Marseille, F-13385 France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marie-jo.amiot-carlin{at}medecine.univ-mrs.fr.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The objective of this study was to create a French database on the polyphenol content of fruit and vegetables as uncooked fruits and vegetables and then to evaluate polyphenol intake through fruit and vegetable consumption in France. To achieve this, we used the Folin-Ciocalteu method adapted to fruit and vegetable polyphenol quantitation (1). Vegetables with the highest polyphenol concentration were artichokes, parsley, and brussels sprouts [>250 mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g fresh edible portion (FEP)]; fruits with the highest concentrations were strawberries, lychees, and grapes (>180 mg of GAE/100 g FEP). Conversely, melons (Cantaloupe cv.) and avocados had the lowest polyphenol concentration for fruits and vegetables, respectively. Based on fruit consumption data, apples and strawberries are the main sources of polyphenols in the French diet, whereas potatoes, lettuces, and onions are the most important vegetable sources. Total polyphenol intake from fruit is about 3 times higher than from vegetables, due to the lower polyphenol concentration in vegetables. The calculation of polyphenol intake, based on both assessment methods used [(Société d'Études de la Communication, Distribution et Publicité (SECODIP) and Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX)], showed that apples and potatoes provide approximatively half of the total polyphenol intake from fruit and vegetables in the French diet.



    Introduction
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Epidemiological studies indicate that fruit and vegetables have protective effects against degenerative diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease (2,3). The benefit ascribed to diets rich in fruits and vegetables could also be due to the avoidance of less desirable components in foods of animal origin, such as saturated fats, pyrolysis mutagens, oxidized cholesterol, etc., and also to the intake of diverse antioxidant compounds, such as vitamin C and the main dietary carotenoids and polyphenols. Because polyphenols represent a wide variety of diverse structures from different subclasses (flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans, proanthocyanidins, etc.), it is difficult to estimate the total polyphenol content. A food database on flavonoids, a class of polyphenols, was recently published by the USDA (4), based on the quality evaluation system reported by Holden et al. (5). Such a database is extremely useful for epidemiological studies on the relation between dietary flavonoids and health. However, many of phenolic compounds escape HPLC/UV quantification, because there is a lack of commercially available standards and because of the presence of unidentified compounds leading to underestimation of total polyphenol content. Recently, Vinson et al. (6,7) reported data on the total polyphenol content of various fruits and vegetables. This content was colorimetrically measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu reaction after correction for ascorbic acid contribution. We recently proposed a similar colorimetric method for polyphenol quantification (1). The aim of this study was primarily to use this method to build a French database on the polyphenol content of fruit and vegetables. Subsequently, French daily polyphenol intake was estimated, using both information from a panel on fruit and vegetable purchases and 6 dietary records from a large French intervention study.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Sampling procedure. For each fruit and vegetable, a statistical sample plan was created to take into account the variety, the main geographical origin (France, Italy, Morocco, Spain, etc.), the harvest season, and the consumption levels. To be statistically representative, all the fruit and vegetables were sampled at national markets, which are the first step of the fruit and vegetable distribution chain to local markets. The edible part analyzed was determined according to usual French consumer habits. However, given the diversity of French behavior, we chose to keep the peel of apples, peaches, and eggplants. Citrus fruits were peeled roughly. Seeds were discarded for all the fruits. In stone fruit, the stone was removed and the peel kept. Most vegetables were home-prepared as raw material before freeze-drying stabilization.

    Preparation and stabilization of homogeneous samples. A sample (30 fruits or vegetables) was taken randomly from a large selection (between 100 and 500). Preliminary studies were carried out to statistically validate the number of fruits and pieces in a sample, according to the Hardley test. This validation was done on apples, oranges, apricots, and strawberries, with 5 lots of 5, 15, or 30 fruits. No significant variation of total polyphenol content (TPC)11 was observed with lots of 30 fruits.

Each fruit or vegetable was cut into 4 pieces and a part was discarded (peel, seeds, or stalks) as previously described. The 2 opposite sides (60 pieces) were taken, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and freeze-dried. After freeze-drying, samples were blended in a Waring Blender and 10 g amounts of freeze-dried material were put in special protection bags to avoid any storage degradation (FA31, Parembal). All samples were stored at –20°C until analysis.

For fruits with a high sugar content (dates and figs), freeze-drying was not possible, thus samples were frozen directly in liquid nitrogen and stored at –20°C. Lastly, the lipid fraction of avocado was extracted with hexane before subjecting the defatted material to the usual procedure. This stabilization procedure did not affect TPC.

    Determination of polyphenol content. Freeze-dried or frozen material (from 300 mg to 1 g) was homogenized with 10 mL of extraction solution (acetone:water, 7:3 vol:vol) for 10 min. The raw extract was obtained after filtration (Whatman). The complete analytical procedure was performed per Georgé et al. (1). Polyphenols are commonly determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, which interacts with other different reducing nonphenolic substances and leads to an overestimation of polyphenol content. In our method, solid phase extraction (Oasis HLB) was carried out on the raw extract to eliminate the water-soluble reducing interferences, including vitamin C. Colorimetric correction was performed by subtracting interfering substances contained in the water washing extract to the raw extract.

Data from the Société d'Études de la Communication, Distribution et Publicité (SECODIP) panel were used to estimated fruit and vegetable consumption. SECODIP is a panel of ~2000 households that register once/wk, 13 times/y all fruits and vegetables purchased. This does not include fruit and vegetables eaten out of the household. We included fruit and vegetables that are produced at home [Internal source CTIFL (Annick Bellamy)]. Individual intake was estimated by dividing the purchases and/or production by the number of people in the household. Waste percentage was estimated to determine the TPC of the edible part.

For individual dietary assessment, we used data from the Supplémentation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, primary prevention trial undertaken to determine whether supplementation with antioxidant vitamins and minerals at nutritional doses can reduce the incidence of cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The rationale, design, and methods of the study, as well as the major characteristics of the participants, have been described in detail elsewhere (8,9). Data on dietary intake were obtained through 24-h records that participants were asked to complete every 2 mo (altogether 6 times/y). Recording guidelines were provided in a manual containing photographs showing 3 portions sizes, along with the 2 intermediate and 2 extreme positions; a total of 7 choices were available to indicate the consumed portion. Photos of portion sizes were previously validated using 780 subjects in a pilot study (10). In total, 2795 men and 3844 women (aged 35–60 y) who completed at least 6 records in the first 2 y of the study were included in these analyses. The mean intake of the completed records was taken for each fruit and vegetable and expressed in g/d. The SUVIMAX study has been approved by the ethical committee for studies with human subjects (CCPPRB no. 706) of Paris-Cochin, and the Commision National Informatique et Liberté (CNIL no. 334641), which advocates that all medical information is confidential and anonymous.

To obtain the amount of polyphenols consumed, the amount of fruit or vegetable consumed in grams/d was multiplied by the polyphenol content in the fruit or vegetable. When an entry in the food consumption data was limited compared with the polyphenol content data, if possible, a weighed mean, based on proportions sold of each variety of fruit, was calculated. For example, the weighed mean content of the several apple varieties was taken and multiplied by daily apple intake to calculate the polyphenol consumption from apples (48% Golden delicious + 0.14% Gala + 0.11% Granny Smith + 0.09% American Red + 0.08% Braeburn + 0.05% Fuji + 0.05% Reinette).


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In this study, we measured total polyphenol content and expressed it as GAE (slope = 0.012, R2 = 0.99). As shown by George et al. (1), gallic acid response represents the mean response of all the major polyphenol compounds in fruit and vegetables as aglycones and conjugates (quercetin and quercitrin, catechin and procyanidin mixture, and caffeic and chlorogenic acid). Our results may therefore differ from those of Vinson et al. (6,7) or Hertog et al. (11), who expressed total polyphenol content in catechin and quercetin equivalent, respectively. Our previous study (1) on rapid TPC analysis was validated on fruit-derived products.

    Total polyphenol content of fresh fruit. Strawberries (from Spain) had the highest polyphenol content [263.8 mg of GAE/100 g FEP (Table 1)]. Vinson et al. (5) placed strawberries in 10th position, with red grapes, bananas, and apples being reported to be the 3 richest fruits, respectively. They reported 133.4 mg of catechin equivalent/100 g FEP in this fruit; this estimate is possibly due to a difference in variety and origin. However, other authors have measured total polyphenol contents in 6 varieties of strawberries (12) and quoted a range from 317.2 to 443.4 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, depending on the cultivar. Vitamin C, which acts as a reducing compound in colorimetric assays, was not removed in this previous work and led to an overestimate of total polyphenol content.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 TPC of fresh fruit

 
Lychees (Kwaymay variety) had the second highest polyphenol content for fruit, with 222.3 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, and was thereby the richest tropical fruit.

Grapes, usually known for their high polyphenol contribution (white and black mean value: 195.5 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, included red, pink (both from Chile), and white varieties (Italy). Due to its high proanthocyanidin content (61 mg/100 g FEP), as recently reported by Gu et al. (13), the red grape (Alphonse Lavallée var.) had the highest polyphenol concentration, roughly twice that of the white (275.5 vs.134.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP). Cantos et al. (14) reported lower values in red and white table grape varieties [11.49 and 36.12 mg in Dominga (white) and Flame Seedless (red) varieties, respectively]. Again, the determination procedure could partially explain this substantial difference; the total polyphenol content was expressed in this previous work as the sum of anthocyanins, flavonols, hydroxycinnamic derivatives, and flavanols determined by HPLC, and many may have escaped HPLC quantification because of a lack of available commercial standards.

The relatively low value obtained for the most consumed banana variety (Cavendish var.), 51.5 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, did not tally with the literature data. In fact, Vinson et al. (7) reported 325 mg of catechin equivalent/100 g FEP in bananas. This large difference could be also attributed to the variety or origin or to vitamin C interference (8.7 mg of ascorbic acid/100 g FEP), as reported in the USDA database (15). Furthermore, Pilar Cano et al. (16) reported a notable quantity of dopamine (17.37 mg/100 g FEP) in the Enana cultivar cultivated in the Canary Islands (Spain). With regard to dopamine structure, this compound may also interact with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and may have been partially eliminated, along with other interferences, in our method. Lastly, mangos (no. 20, Keitt cultivar assayed) had a content of 68.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP. Soong and Barlow (17) reported 240 mg of GAE/100 g FEP in an unknown cultivar purchased in Singapore. Vitamin C response correction (27.7 mg of ascorbic acid/100 g FEP) may partially explain such a difference.

Apricots (no. 4) had the highest mean polyphenol concentration of the fruits (179.8 mg of GAE/100 g FEP on mean), followed by white nectarines (no. 10) and yellow peaches (no. 13). The variety effect must again be stressed, in that the Hart Grant variety was >3 times as rich as Goldrich (318.3 and 103.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, respectively).

Seven apple varieties (Braeburn, Fuji, Gala, Golden delicious, Granny Smith, Reinette, and American Red type) were analyzed in this study. Except for the Fuji variety, with 90.2 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, and Reinette, with 300 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, the other varieties were close to the mean value of 139 mg of GAE/100 g FEP. These data highlighted the effect of variety on TPC content and agreed with the previous work of Vrhovsek et al. (18), who reported a data range of 66.2 to 211.9 mg of catechin/100 g FEP for the Fuji and Renetta varieties, respectively, and a mean value of 110 mg of catechin/100 g FEP.

Among citrus fruits, the mean total polyphenol value ranged from 30 to 45 mg of GAE/100 g FEP. In a previous work on fresh citrus juice from Israel, Gorinstein et al. (19) quoted higher values in orange and grapefruit juices (var. Shamouti and Red Star Ruby, and Sunrise, respectively), with 96.2 and 90.7 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, respectively.

    Total polyphenol content of fresh vegetables. Artichoke (no. 1) (Cynara scolymus L.), (Violet de Provence and Camus var.) had the highest polyphenol content, with a mean value of 321.3 mg of GAE/100 g FEP (Table 2). The data range (202.4–438.1) tallied with the results published recently by Dogan et al. (20) that quoted 425 mg of catechol equivalent/100 g FEP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 TPC of fresh vegetables

 
Brussels sprouts (no. 3; 257.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP) is a cool season crop that belongs to the species Brassica oleracea, which includes cauliflower, broccoli, kale, and collard. The total polyphenol contents among these edible flowers are worth emphasizing, as brussels sprouts (no. 3) contain 20.5 times more than cauliflower (no. 25) and 2.6 times more than broccoli (no. 5). Our data for broccoli (98.9 mg of GAE/100 g FEP) were higher than the previous figures reported by Ninfali and Bacchiocca (21) and Zhang and Hamauzu (22), who reported 69.27 mg of caffeic acid/100 g FEP in the Cymosa variety from Italy and 34.5 mg of GAE/100 g FEP in the florets of broccoli from Nagano (Japan).

Of the onion family (Allium) (shallot, no. 4; onion, no. 7 and garlic, no. 10), shallot, with 104.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP, had the highest value, about twice as rich as garlic. Onion is one of the richest sources of quercetin (flavonol) in the human diet (23), with a mean value of 34.7 mg/100 g FEP (24), with quercetin representing >45% of the total polyphenol content. We found 76.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP for onion, whereas Ninfali and Bacchiocca (21) and Vinson et al. (6) reported 24.4 mg of caffeic acid/100 g FEP in the Bianca della Regina cultivar (Italy) and 92.0 mg of catechin equivalent/100 g FEP, respectively. Such differences may be partially due to result expression (respective molecular weights of the reference compounds), the Folin-Ciocalteu response, or vitamin C interference.

    Polyphenol intake estimated from fruit and vegetables purchased and produced per household. In purchased and home-produced fruit and vegetable quantities (SECODIP assessment method), apples represent ~30% of total consumed fruit (52.8 g FEP/d) (Table 3). This is not the case in the United States, where apples account for just 22% of total polyphenol intake (6). Conversely, strawberries and grapes rank 8th and 9th, respectively, in terms of consumption, while they are the 2nd and 3rd sources of polyphenol, with 18.2 and 17.6 mg of GAE/100 g FEP (albeit both roughly 10% of apple polyphenol concentration). Among citrus fruits, the relation between consumption rank and polyphenol intake for oranges is inverted, as they are the 2nd fruit in terms of consumption, but only the 8th source of polyphenol in the French diet. It is important to stress that 3/4 of oranges are consumed in processed form (juice, juice-based drinks, etc.), which explains the relatively low polyphenol intake from fresh fruit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 French daily polyphenol intake (PI) (Fruits) based on SECODIP and SUVIMAX assessment methods

 
Among vegetables (Table 4), potatoes account for ~45% of total polyphenol intake, due to a high consumption level (203.4 g FEP/d). However, it must be quoted that substantial losses could occur during cooking (25). Indeed, 59% of all vegetables consumed are potatoes (on SECODIP weight basis), the second being tomato at only 10%. The artichoke is interesting in that despite its high polyphenol content (5th), it is not an important source, as consumption decreased from 1.4 to 1.1 g FEP/d over the period 2001–2004 (data not shown). In a similar manner, consumption of vegetables from the family Brassica (brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower) is low; despite to their high polyphenol content, brussels sprouts are only the 11th source of polyphenol intake (1.6 mg of GAE/100 g FEP).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 French daily polyphenol intake (Vegetables) based on SECODIP and SUVIMAX assessment methods

 
A comparison of fruit/vegetable polyphenol intake sources with consumption (Tables 3,4) highlights the major role of fruit, which contributes >64% of total polyphenol intake. The prevalence of apples and potatoes in the French diet is also important, accounting for ~50% of total polyphenol intake from fruit and vegetables. This typical behavior is not seen in the U.S., where bananas and tomatoes are the main polyphenol sources among fruit and vegetables (17 and 8.7% of total intake, respectively), whereas potato is only 4th (5,6).

    Polyphenol intake from fruits and vegetables estimated from 24-h dietary records. This second analysis uses quantities of fruit and vegetable actually consumed in France (SUVIMAX assessment method) and not only the bought and home-produced quantities (which can be misleading in terms of waste and processed products). Using the 2 approaches to calculate intake, the main polyphenol sources from fruit consumption were roughly the same, with apples, strawberries, and grapes being most important. Furthermore, the intake was similar for each gender, except for peaches, which were consumed slightly more by women. The 3 most consumed fruits accounted for ~70 and 80% of total fruit polyphenol intake for women and men, respectively, again highlighting the preponderance of apples, strawberries, and grapes in the French diet.

Of vegetables, potatoes, lettuces (iceberg, romaine, lolla rossa, and endive cvs.), onions, and artichokes were the main polyphenol sources for men. Despite the high polyphenol content of artichokes (321.3 mg of GAE/100 g FEP), it is not an important source, as consumption is low (2.46 and 2.39 g FEP/d for women and men, respectively). By contrast, potatoes have a lower polyphenol content (23.1 mg of GAE/100 g FEP), but a high mean consumption (63.48 and 90.04 g FEP/d for women and men, respectively) and are therefore the most important vegetable source. The 3 most consumed vegetables account for almost 45% of total vegetable polyphenol intake. In all, 74% of total polyphenol intake can be attributed to fruit consumption, with apples providing 30 and 40% for women and men, respectively. Overall vegetable consumption provides 77.8 mg of GAE/100 g FEP for men and 67.1 of GAE/100 g FEP for women.

If we consider the total polyphenol intake to be 1 g/d, as reported by Kühnau (26) or Scalbert and Williamson (27), our study suggests that fruit and vegetable intake accounts for 28% of daily polyphenol intake. Coffee, tea, wine, fruit juices, and cereals are the other main contributors. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to estimate polyphenol losses during processing and home culinary practices.

Furthermore, although total polyphenol content is an interesting parameter to include in epidemiological studies, it is still necessary to evaluate the different classes or structures to determine their biological activity, which greatly depends on their bioavailability (28,29). In fact, the available data suggest substantial variation in the absorption of the different classes of polyphenols and also variations within classes. For example, both anthocyanins and procyanidins appear to be poorly absorbed (<4%). By contrast, isoflavones and flavonols are better absorbed (from 9 to 52%). Nevertheless, polyphenols may act as antioxidants and have protective effects along the digestive tract (from mouth to colon), as suggested recently by Halliwell et al. (30).

In conclusion, of all fruits and vegetables studied, strawberries, lychees, grapes, artichokes, parsley, and brussels sprouts have the highest polyphenol contents (>190 mg of GAE/100 g FEP). Correlating the database on polyphenol content with the 2 dietary databases (i.e., obtained from fruits and vegetables purchased and produced per household and individual dietary records), we showed that apples and potatoes were the main fruit and vegetable, respectively, providing polyphenol intake. Both provide ~47% of total polyphenol intake from fruit and vegetables in the French diet.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Pascaline Alter (from CIRAD, Montpellier, France) and Victor Pirisi (from UMR 476, Marseilles, France) for their help with fruit and vegetable analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by the French Ministry of Research (Contract no. 01 P0681-0693), by Unilever-Bestfoods France, APRIFEL (Agence pour la recherche et l'information en fruits et légumes frais), and Vilmorin Clause & Cie. Back

11 Abbreviations used: FEP: fresh edible portion; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; SECODIP: Société d'Études de la COmmunication, DIstribution et Publicité; SUVIMAX: SUpplémentation en VItamines et Minéraux AntioXydants; TPC: total polyphenol content. Back

Manuscript received 6 February 2006. Initial review completed 1 March 2006. Revision accepted 19 June 2006.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Georgé S, Brat P, Alter P, Amiot M-J. Rapid determination of polyphenols and vitamin C in plant derived products. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:1370–3.[Medline]

2. Arts IC, Hollman PC. Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:317S–25S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Neuhouser ML. Dietary flavonoids and cancer risk: evidence from human population studies. Nutr Cancer. 2004;50:1–7.[Medline]

4. http://www.nalusda.gov/fnic/foodcomp

5. Holden JM, Bhagwat SA, Beecher GR, Haytowitz DB, Gebhardt SE, Eldridge AL, Dwyer J, Peterson J. Development of a Database of Critically Evaluated Flavonoids Data: Application of USDA's Data Quality Evaluation. J Food Compos Anal. 2005;18:829–84.

6. Vinson JA, Hao Y, Su X, Zubik L. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:3630–4.

7. Vinson JA, Su X, Zubik L, Bose P. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: fruits. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:5315–21.[Medline]

8. Hercberg S, Preziosi P, Briancon S, Galan P, Triol I, Malvy D, Roussel AM, Favier A. A primary prevention trial of nutritional doses of antioxidant vitamins and minerals on cardiovascular diseases and cancers in general population: The SU.VI.MAX Study. Design, methods and participants characteristics. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:336–51.[Medline]

9. Hercberg S, Galan P, Preziosi P, Bertrais S, Mennen L, Malvy D, Roussel AM, Favier A, Briancon S, et al. The SU.VI.MAX study. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the health effects of antioxidant vitamins and minerals. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2335–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Le Moullec N, Deheeger M, Preziosi P, Montero P, Valeix P, Rolland-Cachera M-F, Potier de Courcy G, Christides J-P, Galan P, Hercberg S. Validation du manuel-photos utilisé pour l'enquête alimentaire de l'étude SU.VI.MAX. Cah Nutr Diet. 1996;31:158–64.

11. Hertog MG, Hollman PCH, Katan MB, Kromhout D. Intake of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids and their determinants in adults in the Netherlands. Nutr Cancer. 1993;20:21–9.[Medline]

12. Skupien K, Oszmian J. Comparison of six cultivars of strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) grown in northwest Poland. Eur Food Res Technol. 2004;219:66–70.

13. Gu L, Kelm M, Hammerstone J, Beecher G, Holden J, Haytowitz D, Gebhardt S, Prior R. Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in common foods and estimations of normal consumption. J Nutr. 2004;134:613–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Cantos E, Carlos Espín C, Tomás-Barberán FA. Varietal differences among the polyphenol profiles of seven table grape cultivars studied by LC-DAD-MS-MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:5691–6.[Medline]

15. USDA Food Composition Data [database on the Internet]. Beltsville, MD, (2003 and 2004): Nutrient Data Laboratory (US); USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 18. Available from: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data

16. Pilar Cano M, de Ancos B, Lobo MG, Santos M. Improvement of frozen banana (Musa cavendishii, cv. Enana) colour by blanching: relationship between browning, phenols and polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activities. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1997;204:60–5.

17. Soong YY, Barlow PJ. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of selected fruit seeds. Food Chem. 2004;88:411–7.

18. Vrhovsek U, Rigo A, Tonon D, Mattivi F. Quantification of polyphenols in different apple varieties. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:6532–8.[Medline]

19. Gorinstein S, Leontowicz H, Leontowicz M, Krzeminski R, Gralak M, Martin-Belloso O, Delgado-Licon E, Haruenkit R, Katrich E, et al. Fresh Israeli Jaffa blond (Shamouti) orange and Israeli Jaffa red Star Ruby (Sunrise) grapefruit juices affect plasma lipid metabolism and antioxidant capacity in rats fed added cholesterol. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:4853–9.[Medline]

20. Dogan S, Turan Y, Ertürk H, Arslan O. Characterization and purification of polyphenol oxidase from artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:776–85.[Medline]

21. Ninfali P, Bacchiocca M. Polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of vegetables under fresh and frozen conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2222–6.[Medline]

22. Zhang D, Hamauzu Y. Phenolics, ascorbic acid, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of broccoli and their changes during conventional and microwave heating. Food Chem. 2004;88:503–9.

23. Sellappan S, Akoh CC. Flavonoids and antioxidant capacity of Georgia-grown Vidalia onions. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:5338–42.[Medline]

24. Lachman J, Pronek D, Hejtmankova A, Dudjak J, Pivec V, Faitova, K. Total polyphenol and main flavonoid antioxidants in different onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties. Hort Sci. 2003;30:142–7.

25. Dao L, Friedman M. Chlorogenic acid content of fresh and processed potatoes determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. J Agric Food Chem. 1992;40:2152–6.

26. Kuhnau J. The flavonoids. A class of semi-essential food components: their role in human nutrition. World Rev Nutr Diet. 1976;24:117–91.[Medline]

27. Scalbert A, Williamson G. Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J Nutr. 2000;130:2073S–85S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Rémésy C. Bioavailibility and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailibility studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:230S–42S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Williamson G, Manach C. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II. Review of 93 intervention studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:243S–55S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Halliwell B, Rafter J, Jenner A. Health promotion by flavonoids, tocopherols, tocotrienols and other phenols: direct or indirect effect? Antioxidant or not? Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:268S–77S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
P.-P. WU, S.-C. KUO, W.-W. HUANG, J.-S. YANG, K.-C. LAI, H.-J. CHEN, K.-L. LIN, Y.-J. CHIU, L.-J. HUANG, and J.-G. CHUNG
(-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Induced Apoptosis in Human Adrenal Cancer NCI-H295 Cells through Caspase-dependent and Caspase-independent Pathway
Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 1435 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
E. A. Milward, S. K. Baines, M. W. Knuiman, H. C. Bartholomew, M. L. Divitini, D. G. Ravine, D. G. Bruce, and J. K. Olynyk
Noncitrus Fruits as Novel Dietary Environmental Modifiers of Iron Stores in People With or Without HFE Gene Mutations
Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2008; 83(5): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M.-L. Ovaskainen, R. Torronen, J. M. Koponen, H. Sinkko, J. Hellstrom, H. Reinivuo, and P. Mattila
Dietary Intake and Major Food Sources of Polyphenols in Finnish Adults
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 562 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amiot, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Amiot, M. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2006 by American Society for Nutrition