![]() |
|
|
Cancer Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nhowarth{at}crch.hawaii.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 kg/m2 in each ethnic sex group. This same increase in ED was associated with a significantly increased risk of being overweight in all ethnic sex groups, varying from 4% in African American men to 34% in Japanese American women. Our findings suggest that consumption of an energy dense diet is a risk factor for higher BMI in both men and women across ethnic groups.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 y (2). However, there is considerable variation among sex and ethnic groups: in Caucasians the prevalence is 57% in women and 67% in men; in African Americans it is 78% in women and 60% in men; and in Latinos it is 72% in women and 74% in men (3). There are no national statistics for Asian or Pacific Island groups. Energy density (ED)3 is defined as the amount of energy per unit weight of food (kJ/g) (4). Differences in BMI among ethnic groups can be partially explained by the overall ED of their customary diets (4,5). In an analysis of dietary patterns, Native Hawaiians and Latinos had high scores for the high ED fat and meat pattern, whereas Japanese Americans had high scores for the vegetable and fruit pattern (6). The fat and meat pattern was also associated with a lower BMI, whereas the vegetable and fruit pattern was associated with a higher BMI.
Studies show that people have little innate ability to downregulate the amount of food consumed to compensate for high ED (79), at least in the short term. In addition, energy dense foods tend to be high in fat and/or sugar, and highly palatable (10), possibly leading to overconsumption. Short-term feeding interventions show that people regularly ingest more energy when offered higher rather than lower ED foods. Results have been consistent when test foods of the same energy content but different ED were ingested as preloads (11) or incorporated into one or several meals (8,12,13). However, longer-term studies (1416) have found that greater consumption of energy from energy-dense foods may be compensated for by decreased intake at subsequent meals, resulting in no net effect on body size.
Few epidemiologic studies have examined dietary ED among free-living persons, and only one, to our knowledge, has compared ED among men and women of different ethnic groups (5). We used the baseline data from participants in the Hawaii-Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC), a large prospective study of 5 ethnic groups (17), to determine whether groups that habitually consume a diet higher in ED have a higher BMI.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MEC includes over 215,000 participants, aged 4575 y in 1993, and consists predominantly of 5 ethnic groups: African American (AA), Caucasian (CS), Latino (LT), Native Hawaiian (NH) and Japanese American (JA). Participants completed a 26-page mailed self-administered questionnaire that included a comprehensive quantitative food frequency questionnaire (QFFQ). The questionnaire also asked about demographics, medical history, and lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, smoking status, and self-reported height and weight. The analysis excluded cohort members outside of the 5 major ethnic groups (n = 13,959), individuals with implausible diets (energy intake >3 SEM or macronutrient intake >3.5 SEM) (n = 8265), and subjects with missing data for height or weight (n = 2549). The final analysis included 191,023 cohort members (86,713 men and 104,310 women). The investigation was approved by the University of Hawaii and University of Southern California Institutional Review Boards.
Dietary data.
As previously described (17,18), the QFFQ was developed specifically for the study population, and asked about consumption of >180 food items during the preceding year. Drinking water consumption was not assessed. ED (kJ/g) was calculated for each individual by dividing reported daily energy intake by the total grams of food consumed. We compared 3 calculation methods: 1) food and all beverages, 2) food and energy-containing beverages (excluding diet soda, tea, and plain coffee), and 3) food only.
A calibration substudy was conducted where
230 MEC members in each of the 10 ethnic sex groups provided one unannounced 24-h recall per month by telephone for 3 mo, followed by a QFFQ
3 mo later. The same ED variables were calculated for the QFFQ and for each 24-h recall in the calibration substudy, and the mean ED for each individual across recalls was used in analyses.
Other measures.
BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). Subjects were also classified as normal weight (BMI <25) or overweight/obese (BMI
25). Responses to questions on hours spent, on average, each day in sleeping, five sitting activities, strenuous sports, vigorous work, and moderate activity were aggregated into overall metabolic equivalents of activity (METs) (19). Smokers were defined as individuals who reported having smoked at least 20 packs of cigarettes in their lifetime and were currently smoking. The medical history included a self-report for diagnoses of the following conditions that may alter dietary habits: breast, colon, cervical, melanoma, prostate, stomach, uterine, and other cancers; hypertension, previous heart attack, stroke, diabetes, tuberculosis, gout, ulcers, partial removal of the stomach, gallstones, and removal of the gallbladder. A summary chronic disease variable reflected a diagnosis of any of these conditions.
Statistical analyses.
The validity of ED measures was investigated by computing Pearson's correlation coefficients between the mean ED across multiple 24-h recalls and the ED from the QFFQ in the MEC calibration substudy. The correlation was corrected for within-subject variability across the recalls.
Separate linear regression models of BMI on ED were evaluated for each of the 10 ethnic sex groups. BMI was log transformed to meet model assumptions. The following covariates were included in each model: age, current smoking status (yes/no), chronic disease, total METs of activity, and years of school completed. Our primary research question was whether ED was related to BMI. However, energy intake, amount of food consumed, and ED are related, and ED may be related to BMI simply because individuals who consume a diet with a high ED also tend to have high food and/or energy intakes. To address this, the following models were run: model A) excluding both the amount of food and energy as covariates; B) including amount of food as a covariate; C) including energy intake as a covariate; and D) including both covariates. The slope for ED, adjusted for energy and food amount, is the change in log BMI expected from a unit change in ED at a mean level of food amount and energy. Energy intake has been hypothesized to mediate the influence of ED on weight (that is, act as an intermediate variable). Therefore, its inclusion in the model allowed us to determine the influence of ED beyond its association with energy intake. Additional models were adjusted for men and women, with interaction terms between ethnic groups and energy density, and global F tests of all interaction terms were performed to test for differences in slope across groups.
Logistic regression was performed to determine the odds ratio and 95% CI of being overweight or obese associated with a one-unit increase in daily ED. Separate models were adjusted for each of the 10 ethnic sex groups. Nondietary covariates were the same as those for the linear regression models. Additionally, models including interaction terms were compared within each sex (through the likelihood ratio test) to models with main effects to determine whether energy density exhibited a different relation to overweight status across ethnic groups.
We used ethnic sex-specific correlations for ED between the QFFQ and recalls in the calibration substudy to correct the slopes from linear regression and the odds ratios from logistic regression by the method of moments (20,21). The variances were adjusted to account for the variability in the correlation by the delta method. The corrected parameters were compared across ethnic groups via a chi-square test, assuming normality of the parameters. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.1. Comparisons with P < 0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.45. Thus, we considered this QFFQ measure of ED acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Across the ethnic sex groups a 1 kJ/g higher ED was associated with
1 kg/m2 higher BMI, and the association was highly significant. One kJ/g is larger than the greatest mean difference across ethnic sex groups (0.46 kJ/g), but is not unreasonable to attain through dietary changes. Although the association of ED with BMI was not large in absolute terms, it is most likely attenuated by the measurement error inherent in all dietary assessment instruments, including QFFQs (22). Thus, the true associations between ED and body size may be much stronger.
The 2 most important determinants of dietary ED are water and fat (4), and both vary considerably among foods. Fiber may also influence ED because of its relatively low energy content. It may be possible to reduce ED enough to affect weight gain through simple dietary changes, such as incorporating water into foods by making soups (11), adding vegetables to mixed dishes, using fiber-rich whole grains rather than refined grains, and reducing fat content (23,24). Beverages such as soda and sweetened juices are energy-dilute but may not be associated with a reduction of energy intake (25,26).
Various methods have been used to calculate ED (5,2729), but we found that correlations between the QFFQ and 24-h recalls were the highest for the measure that includes food and energy-containing beverages. This variable also had the strongest relation with BMI in regression models. Ledikwe et al. (5) found that the day-to-day variation was high when all caloric beverages were included in an analysis of the Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and recommended against their inclusion in the calculation of ED. However, the MEC used a QFFQ whereas the CSFII used two 24-h recalls. The QFFQ method assesses intake over a year's time and should not be influenced by day-to-day variability. EDs calculated from our QFFQ data are slightly lower than those calculated from 24-h recall data in other studies (5,30). However, within our calibration study, mean ED from QFFQ data were slightly higher (4.81 ± 1.01 kJ/g) than from 24-h recall data (4.47 ± 1.41 kJ/g).
The differences in ED were reflected in corresponding variations in BMI for some but not all of the 10 ethnic sex groups (Table 2). JA exhibited the lowest ED, as well as the lowest BMI;. AA reported diets with the highest ED, and AA women had the highest BMIs. NH and LT of both sexes were anomalies, with low ED and high BMI. Although the reasons for these anomalies are unclear and require further study, they may be due in part to different meal patterns.
The magnitude of the association between ED and overweight status varied among ethnic groups, perhaps reflecting a dissimilarity in the accuracy of reporting energy intakes by ethnic group (18) and by weight status (31,32). AA men showed the lowest risk of being overweight from a more energy dense diet and also reported the lowest energy intake. Furthermore, the correlation between ED on the QFFQ and the recalls was notably lower for AA men in the calibration substudy. By comparison, the risk of overweight from a more energy dense diet was much higher in JA of both sexes, and the correlation of the 2 energy density measures for JA was above the mean in the calibration substudy.
The association of ED with BMI remained when the model was adjusted for energy and food amounts. This implies that ED has an association with BMI independent of its 2 components. Because of a likely correlated measurement error in energy and amount of food, it is possible that ED is a better predictor of actual intake than energy intake alone. More study of the errors in reporting these dietary variables would be useful.
A primary strength of this study is the large representative sample of participants from 5 diverse ethnic groups. However, this analysis involved cross-sectional data and causation could not be determined. Anthropometric variables were self-reported, but other researchers have found good concordance between self-reported and measured weight and height in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (33,34) and the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (35). Participants in the MEC are presently responding to a repeat of the baseline questionnaire, where both weight and dietary information, in addition to waist and hip circumference, are being collected. Thus, longitudinal analyses will be possible in the future.
In conclusion, our results, combined with those of previous intervention studies, strongly suggest that a less energy dense diet is associated with a lower BMI in both men and women across ethnic groups. These preliminary cross-sectional results indicate a need for prospective epidemiological studies to delineate the link between ED and obesity risk, as well as intervention trials to further examine possible disparities in the associations of ED with BMI across ethnic groups. If our findings are confirmed, they provide another potential avenue for public health education.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 The Multiethnic Cohort Study was funded by grant R37CA054281 from the National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; additional support was provided by postdoctoral grant no. R25 CA90956, NIH/NCI. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used: AA, African American; CS, Caucasian; ED, energy density; JA, Japanese American; LT, Latino; MEC, Multiethnic Cohort; METs, metabolic equivalents of activity; NH, Native Hawaiian; QFFQ, quantitative food frequency questionnaire. ![]()
Manuscript received 23 January 2006. Initial review completed 23 February 2006. Revision accepted 23 May 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282:15239.
2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 19992000. JAMA. 2002;288:17237.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Table 68. Overweight, obesity, and healthy weight among persons 20 years if age and over, according to sex, age, race, and Hispanic origin: United States, 1960, 62, 197174, 197680, 198894, and 19992000. Accessed on March 16, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/search.do?action=search&queryText=overweight+and+obesity&x=9&y=9.
4. Yao M, Roberts SB. Dietary energy density and weight regulation. Nutr Rev. 2001;59:24758.[Medline]
5. Ledikwe JH, Blanck HM, Kettel Khan L, Serdula MK, Seymour JD, Tohill BC, Rolls BJ. Dietary energy density determined by eight calculation methods in a nationally representative United States population. J Nutr. 2005;135:2738.
6. Park S-Y, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Yamamoto JF, Sharma S, Hankin JH, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Dietary patterns using the food guide pyramid groups are associated with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. J Nutr. 2005;135:8439.
7. Stubbs RJ, Johnstone AM, O'Reilly LM, Barton K, Reid C. The effect of covertly manipulating the energy density of mixed diets on ad libitum food intake in pseudo free-living humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:9807.[Medline]
8. Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Chow M, Pelkman CL, Thorwart ML. Energy density but not fat content of foods affected energy intake in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:86371.
9. Bell EA, Rolls BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake across multiple levels of fat content in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:10108.
10. Drewnowski A. Energy density, palatability, and satiety: implications for weight control. Nutr Rev. 1998;56:34753.[Medline]
11. Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Thorwart ML. Water incorporated into a food but not served with a food decreases energy intake in lean women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:44855.
12. Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Pelkman CL, Thorwart ML, Rolls BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:41220.[Abstract]
13. Stubbs RJ, Ritz P, Coward WA, Prentice AM. Covert manipulation of the ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate and energy density: effect on food intake and energy balance in free-living men eating ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:3307.
14. de Castro JM. Dietary energy density is associated with increased intake in free-living humans. J Nutr. 2004;134:33541.
15. de Castro JM. Macronutrient and dietary energy density influences on the intake of free-living humans. Appetite. 2006;46:15.[Medline]
16. Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Modulatory factors in the effect of energy density on energy intake. Br J Nutr. 2004;92:S359.[Medline]
17. Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankin JH, Nomura AMY, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Stram DO, Monroe KR, Earle ME, Nagamine FS. A Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: Baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:34657.
18. Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Monroe KR, Park S, Henderson BE, Nomura AMY, Earle ME, et al. Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:35876.
19. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2005.
20. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA. Measurement error in nonlinear models. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
21. Fuller WA. Measurement error models. New York: Wiley; 1982.
22. Beaton GH. Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:253S61S.
23. Rolls BJ, Barnett RA. Volumetrics. New York: Harper Collins; 2000.
24. Rolls BJ, Drewnowski A, Ledikwe JH. Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:S98103.[Medline]
25. DiMeglio DP, Mattes RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes Metab Relat Disord. 2000;24:794800.
26. Almiron-Roig E, Drewnowski A. Hunger, thirst, and energy intakes following consumption of caloric beverages. Physiol Behav. 2003;79:76773.[Medline]
27. Seagle HM, Davy BM, Grunwald GK, Hill JO. Enegy density of self-reported food intake: variation and relationship to other food components. Obes Res. 1997;5:78S.
28. Cox DN, Mela DJ. Determination of energy density of freely selected diets: methodological issues and implications. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:4954.[Medline]
29. Grunwald GK, Seagle HM, Peters JC, Hill JO. Quantifying and separating the effects of macronutrient composition and non-macronutrients on energy density. Br J Nutr. 2001;86:26576.[Medline]
30. Stookey JD. Energy density, energy intake and weight status in a large free-living sample of Chinese adults: exploring the underlying roles of fat, protein, carbohydrate, fiber and water intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:34959.[Medline]
31. Livingstone MBE, Black AE. Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr. 2003;133:895S920S.
32. Schoeller DA. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report. Metabolism. 1995;44:1822.[Medline]
33. Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 19881994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:2834.[Medline]
34. Rowland ML. Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52:112533.
35. Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:5615.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L Deierlein, A. M. Siega-Riz, and A. Herring Dietary energy density but not glycemic load is associated with gestational weight gain Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2008; 88(3): 693 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bes-Rastrollo, R. M van Dam, M. A. Martinez-Gonzalez, T. Y Li, L. L Sampson, and F. B Hu Prospective study of dietary energy density and weight gain in women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2008; 88(3): 769 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A McCaffrey, K. L Rennie, M. A Kerr, J. M Wallace, M. P Hannon-Fletcher, W A. Coward, S. A Jebb, and M B. E Livingstone Energy density of the diet and change in body fatness from childhood to adolescence; is there a relation? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1230 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O Fisher, Y. Liu, L. L Birch, and B. J Rolls Effects of portion size and energy density on young children's intake at a meal Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||