![]() |
|
|
,4





* Dental Working Group of the Polish Small Animal Veterinary Association (PSAVA), Lublin, Poland;
Arka Veterinary Clinic, Kraków, Poland; ** University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA;
Szko
a G
ówna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warsaw Agricultural University, Warszawa, Poland; 
Elwet Veterinary Hospital, Warszawa, Poland; and 
Iams, Procter & Gamble, Warszawa, Poland
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jgawor{at}pp.com.pl.
KEY WORDS: cats dogs diet oral health periodontal disease pet smile campaign
The oral cavity in cats and dogs is commonly affected by pathology (14), with periodontal disease most frequently recognized (2,58). Although changes in feeding methods have arguably improved the health of cats and dogs by reducing or preventing diseases associated with nutritional deficiencies and excesses, periodontal disease remains a serious problem. Numerous studies showed an influence of diet and home oral hygiene on periodontal health (916). There is reasonable evidence that soft diets are associated with increased frequency and severity of periodontal disease, and that harder foods requiring vigorous prehension and mastication are preferable for cats and dogs (17).
Poland has
8.5 million dogs and cats; however, its pet food industry is a relatively young market and is estimated to reach
10% of domestic pets (18,19). The pet owners' low awareness of consequences of malnutrition on general health and economic aspects may play a role in the continued popularity of home-made foods. The so-called "Pet Smile Campaign" (PSC), conducted previously in the United Kingdom in 1996, was an attempt to enhance oral health awareness and to promote home oral hygiene in cats and dogs. The present study was undertaken to assess parameters related to oral health, dietary management, and home oral hygiene and to further elucidate the relation of diet and periodontal disease in a large feline and canine sample population.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The mean oral health index increased with age in both cats and dogs (Table 4). Even after adjustment of this index for age, the mean oral health index was significantly higher in cats and dogs fed soft food than in cats and dogs fed dry or mixed food. The mean oral health index also was significantly higher in cats and dogs fed mixed food compared with cats and dogs fed dry food (Table 5).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The size of the mandibular lymph nodes on palpation, the presence of dental deposits, and the presence of periodontal disease were determined. Objectivity was enhanced by hands-on training and step-by-step instructions provided to all participating veterinarians. It is acknowledged that periodontal examination in the present study was not in depth and not complete. The examining veterinarians evaluated the most severely affected teeth in nonanesthetized patients by visual examination. Plaque index, gingival index, and malodor are difficult to evaluate without anesthesia, appropriate instruments, and adequately trained personnel (3,12,22,23,25,26). Assessment of dietary management was limited to whether the food was dry, mixed (dry and soft), or soft. Other parameters such as the size and texture of kibbles and frequency of feedings were not evaluated.
Over 90% of cats and >80% of dogs in the present study were fed dry or mixed food. This is in sharp contrast to previous data that estimated the rate of commercial dry food fed to Polish cats and dogs at 9% (19). Lymphadenopathy, dental deposits, and periodontal disease were absent significantly more often in cats and dogs fed dry food compared with those fed mixed food. Differences in these parameters between cats and dogs fed mixed food and cats and dogs fed soft food were also significant. The mean age of cats and dogs fed dry or mixed food was significantly lower than the mean age of cats and dogs fed soft food. The mean oral health index, and thus the severity of disease, increased with age in both cats and dogs.
One might argue that older cats and dogs naturally have worse oral health and therefore prefer soft food over dry food. Therefore, a 1-way ANCOVA was performed to adjust for age. Even after adjustment for age, the mean oral health index was significantly higher in cats and dogs fed soft food compared with those fed dry or mixed food, and the mean oral health index was significantly higher in cats and dogs fed mixed food than in those fed dry food. These results indicate that feeding a dry food diet has a positive influence on oral health, decreasing the occurrence of mandibular lymphadenopathy, dental deposits, and periodontal disease in cats and dogs.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosure: no relationships to disclose. ![]()
3 IAMS Poland supported the study as a sponsor. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Bell AF. Dental disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1965;6:42128.
2. Harvey CE, Emily PP. Periodontal disease, small animal dentistry. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1993. p. 89144.
3. Burrows CF, Miller WH, Harvey CE. Oral medicine. In: Harvey CE, editor. Veterinary dentistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1985. p. 2333.
4. National Companion Animal Study. University of Minnesota Center for Companion Animal Health; 1996. p. 3.
5. Lyon KF. Advances in periodontal therapy. What about the basics? J Vet Dent. 1993;10(1):5.[Medline]
6. Gawor J. Osady naz
bne u psów i kotów. Patogeneza, post
powanie, profilaktyka. [Dental deposits in dogs and cats. Pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis]. Magazyn Weterynaryjny; Wet. 1997;29:1714.
7. DuPont GA. Prevention of periodontal disease. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1998;28:112945.[Medline]
8. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Kolar LM, Klausner JS. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;214:133641.[Medline]
9. Gorrel C. Periodontal disease and diet in domestic pets. J Nutr. 1998;128:2712S4.
10. Gorrel C, Rawlings JM. The role of tooth-brushing and diet in the maintenance of periodontal health in dogs. J Vet Dent. 1996;13:13943.[Medline]
11. Logan EI, Finney O, Hefferren JJ. Effects of a dental food on plaque accumulation and gingival health in dogs. J Vet Dent. 2002;19:158.[Medline]
12. Gorrel C, Bierer TL. Long-term effects of a dental hygiene chew on the periodontal health of dogs. J Vet Dent. 1999;16:10913.[Medline]
13. Harvey CE, Shofer FS, Laster L. Correlation of diet, other chewing activities and periodontal disease in North American client-owned dogs. J Vet Dent. 1996;13:1015.[Medline]
14. Rawlings JM, Gorrel C, Markwell PJ. Effect of two dietary regimens on gingivitis in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1997;38:14751.[Medline]
15. Thyse LFH, Vrieling HE, Dijkshoorn NA, Picavet P, Logan EI. Hill's Prescription Diet Feline t/d: results of a field study. Proceedings of the Hill's European Symposium on Oral Care; 2003 Mar 1921; Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2003. p. 603.
16. Clarke DE, Cameron A. Relationship between diet, dental calculus and periodontal disease in domestic and feral cats in Australia. Aust Vet J. 1998;76:6903.[Medline]
17. Watson AD. Diet and periodontal disease in dogs and cats. Aust Vet J. 1994;71:3138.[Medline]
18. Szarek J. Cz
owiek wobec bezdomnych zwierz
t Materia
y z I Mi
dzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowej 2002 May 910 [Man and homeless animals. Proceedings of 1st International Conference]; Olsztyn, Uniwersytet Warmi
sko-Mazurski, Poland; 2002.
19. Pet Ownership Survey, MEMRB International Poland. Sp. z o.o. for Masterfoods Poland; May/June 2004.
20. Gawor J, Jodkowska K, Kurski G. Post
powanie z pacjentem stomatologicznym. [Dental patient management. Instructions for veterinarians participating in the Pet Smile Campaign 20032004.] PSAVA and FH STOPA, Gdynia, Poland; March 2003.
21. Cleland WP. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2000;15:2215.[Medline]
22. Hennet P, Soulard Y, Salesse H. Evaluation of the Boyce & Logan plaque scoring method for the study of plaque accumulation in dogs. Proceedings of the 11th European Congress of Veterinary Dentistry; 2002 Oct 12; Granada, Spain; 2002. p. 568.
23. Schumacher CB. Charting and the oral examination. J Vet Dent. 1993;10(3):913.[Medline]
24. Harvey CE. Shape and size of teeth of dogs and catsrelevance to studies of plaque and calculus accumulation. J Vet Dent. 2002;19:18695.[Medline]
25. Logan EI, Boyce EN. Oral health assessment in dogs: parameters and methods. J Vet Dent. 1994;11:5863. Erratum in. J Vet Dent. 1994;11:133.[Medline]
26. Boyce EN, Logan EI. Oral health assessment in dogs: study design and results. J Vet Dent. 1994;11:6470.[Medline]
27. Breuer MM, Cosgrove RS. The relationship between gingivitis and plaque levels. J Periodontol. 1989;60:1725.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||