Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garlick, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garlick, P. J.
© 2006 The American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:1722S-1725S, June 2006


Supplement: 5th Amino Acid Assessment Workshop: Session III

Toxicity of Methionine in Humans1

Peter J. Garlick2

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pgarlick{at}uiuc.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The literature has been searched to identify evidence relating to the possible toxicity of the amino acid methionine in human subjects. Nutritional and metabolic studies have employed amounts of methionine, including the D and DL isomers, both below and above the requirement and have not reported adverse effects in adults and children. Although methionine is known to exacerbate psychopathological symptoms in schizophrenic patients, there is no evidence of similar effects in healthy subjects. The role of methionine as a precursor of homocysteine is the most notable cause for concern. A "loading dose" of methionine (0.1 g/kg) has been given, and the resultant acute increase in plasma homocysteine has been used as an index of the susceptibility to cardiovascular disease. Although this procedure results in vascular dysfunction, this is acute and unlikely to result in permanent damage. However, a 10-fold larger dose, given mistakenly, resulted in death. Longer-term studies in adults have indicated no adverse consequences of moderate fluctuations in dietary methionine intake, but intakes higher than 5 times normal resulted in elevated homocysteine levels. These effects of methionine on homocysteine and vascular function are moderated by supplements of vitamins B-6, B-12, C, and folic acid. In infants, methionine intakes of 2–5 times normal resulted in impaired growth and extremely high plasma methionine levels, but no adverse long-term consequences were observed.


KEY WORDS: • methionine • toxicity • human

Previous reviews of methionine toxicity have relied largely on data derived from animals and have led to the belief that methionine is the most toxic amino acid (1). In humans, however, despite the use of methionine to detoxify acetaminophen (paracetamol) and its role as a precursor of homocyteine, an indicator of cardiovascular risk, there appear to have been no systematic studies with toxicity or adverse effects as the primary focus. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to examine the literature for evidence that might enable the safety of methionine in humans to be derived. For this purpose, literature searches were performed including journals from the fields of nutrition and metabolism (including amino acid requirements), physiology, pharmacology, psychology, and clinical medicine.

    Nutritional and metabolic studies. During the 1960s and 1970s, there were several studies of the dietary requirement for sulfur amino acids, which employed ranges of intakes of methionine (with or without cyteine) from below to above the estimated requirement (27). The highest intakes given to adults were almost three times the current estimates of the requirement, derived from studies of graded intake levels in volunteers (8), but no adverse effects were reported. Nutritional studies of sulfur amino acids in healthy and malnourished children (914) have not employed such large excesses over requirement, so they might not be expected to show any adverse effects.

In some of the above studies, the methionine was given as DL-methionine, D-methionine, or N-acetyl-methionine rather than L-methionine (6,7,12,14). These L-methionine analogs seem to have been well tolerated, except that DL-methionine in infant feeds resulted in high tissue concentrations of D-methionine, with unknown consequences (15). However, no other adverse effects were noted. It has also been shown that intake of D-methionine, but not L-methionine, caused high excretion of 3-methyl propionate (16).

Methionine has also been given to induce acidosis. In a study to investigate whether the acidosis induced by the metabolism of an oral dose of 11.3 g of methionine would modify ketosis during starvation or ketogenic dieting, the fall in blood pH was similar to that produced by an equivalent dose of ammonium chloride (17). This could be detrimental to the subjects if continued for extended periods, as metabolic acidosis has been shown to result in an inhibition of muscle protein synthesis in animals (18). Moreover, in human volunteers, acidosis resulted in negative nitrogen balance and decreased synthesis of muscle protein and serum albumin (19,20), which could be detrimental to body protein homeostasis if continued. The acidosis induced by methionine could be the rationale for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections by L-methionine (21). In another clinical study, methionine (5 or 10 g/d) was given to patients as a treatment for rheumatoid polyarthritis (22). No serious adverse effects were reported, although nausea, vomiting, constipation, and halitosis were frequent.

Methionine is an indispensable amino acid for humans, but there is evidence that if given in excess, it can interfere with the utilization of nitrogen from dispensable amino acids. In studies of nitrogen balance in subjects receiving low-protein diets, nitrogen balance was improved in subjects receiving low protein plus urea or low protein plus glycine, but not with diets containing low protein plus methionine or low protein plus both methionine and urea (23). Also, the urinary excretion of 5-L-oxoproline, a marker of glycine availability, was significantly lower when the diets contained low protein plus urea or low protein plus urea and methionine. There was a significant correlation between the excretion of 5-L-oxoproline and excretion of sulfate. The interpretation was that glycine was consumed to detoxify the excess methionine, with the result that the availability of glycine for other metabolic processes became limiting (23).

    Neuropsychiatric diseases. In 1952 Osmond and Smithies (24) proposed the "transmethylation theory" of schizophrenia, based on the knowledge that methyl donors such as methionine cause exacerbation of psychopathological symptoms (25). They suggested that schizophrenia occurs as a result of a disturbance of methylation, leading to the conversion of catecholamines released under conditions of stress-induced anxiety to psychotoxic mescaline-like compounds. Large doses of methionine (5–40 g/d of L- or DL-methionine), with or without a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, given over periods of 1 wk to 2 mo, have resulted in striking exacerbations of psychotic symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients (see ref. 26 for further information). However, in healthy subjects doses of 10 g of methionine have been shown to have no effect (27).

    Methionine and homocysteine. The first step in the metabolism of methionine is its conversion to homocysteine via the intermediate, S-adenosylmethionine. Homocysteine is then removed by combination with serine to produce cystathionine, which is cleaved to form {alpha}-ketobutyrate and cysteine. As long ago as 1969, it was noticed that children with the inherited disorder homocysteinuria suffered from vascular abnormalities and frequent arterial and venous thromboses (28). Because the homocysteinemia was associated with arteriosclerotic plaques in individuals with mutations of 3 different enzymes involved in the conversion of methionine to homocysteine, it was concluded that the homocysteine itself is atherogenic (28,29). Since that time the role of homocysteine in the development of vascular disease has been extensively researched and clarified. In 1985, "methionine intolerance" was cited as "a possible risk factor for coronary artery disease" (30), and it was also suggested that patients with hyperhomocysteinemia have a 50% probability of a vascular accident before age 30 (31).

Since 1985, there has been a large amount of research into the relationships between methionine intake in normal subjects in relation to plasma homocysteine and vascular disease. In particular, this research has yielded a considerable amount of information regarding both the acute and chronic effects of methionine intake on indices of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, because methionine has been given to many subjects in these studies, the incidence of adverse effects can be used to derive information on other possible aspects of toxicity. A "methionine-loading test" has been employed in a large number of subjects to produce an increase in plasma homocysteine. After the methionine is given orally, there is an increase in plasma homocysteine concentration, which is then used as an index of the susceptibility of the individual to cardiovascular disease. This is believed to be a more sensitive index than the fasting homocysteine concentration alone (32). The dose given is usually 100 mg/kg body weight, which is approximately 7 times the average daily requirement for total sulfur amino acids (methionine plus cysteine) (8).

The methionine-loading test not only produces a rise in homocysteine concentration but also mimics homocysteinemia in other respects. For example, in a study of the effect of an oral dose of methionine (100 mg/kg) in healthy volunteers, plasma homocysteine doubled at 2 h after methionine ingestion, with a further increase at 4 h (33). Flow-meditated dilatation fell at 2 h, with a further fall at 4 h. In particular, there was an inverse relation between homocysteine concentration and flow-mediated dilatation. In a similar study, the same authors showed that physiological increments in plasma homocysteine resulting from the intake of graded amounts of methionine, or of animal protein, induced endothelial dysfunction. However, an amino acid mixture lacking methionine had no effect (34). Conversely, arterial stiffness, as measured by pulse wave analysis, does not appear to be altered by methionine loading (35).

An important question relating to the possible toxicity of methionine is whether the responses to the methionine-loading test are responses to methionine directly or responses to the rise in homocysteine level. This question has been answered by comparing the response of forearm blood flow to oral doses of methionine and homocysteine that by design gave the same increase in plasma homocysteine concentration (36). The 2 treatments resulted in similar responses of forearm blood flow, indicating that the active agent is homocysteine, not methionine per se.

    Methionine-loading test: potential for adverse effects. As described above, the methionine-loading test results in an increase in homocysteine level and vascular endothelial dysfunction. However, these effects are acute and therefore seem unlikely to be harmful after a single test. Various smaller doses of methionine have been examined in relation to their potential as an additive to acetaminophen (paracetamol), for which it is the antidote (37). There was no significant difference in plasma homocysteine concentrations at 1 h after a single dose of methionine (250 mg) or after 1 mo of methionine, 250 mg daily, but after 1 wk of methionine, 100 mg/kg body weight daily, there was an increase in plasma homocysteine. With each of these dose regimens, there were no changes in endothelial-dependent or endothelial-independent responses. The conclusion was that the 2 lower dose regimens were safe but that the dose of 100 mg/kg for 1 wk could not be declared safe.

The safety of the methionine-loading test has been examined in an epidemiological study of 296 patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease and 591 controls (38). There were acute complications in 33% of the female and 17% of the male patients, with no difference between patients and controls. However, these complications were relatively mild, with dizziness being the most common symptom, which was attributed to the methionine. Isolated sleepiness, nausea, polyuria, and decreased or increased blood pressure were also observed. None of the 887 patients died within a 30-d period. The conclusion was that the test frequently causes transient complications, impairing perception and vigilance, but it does not have serious adverse effects on vasculature and may be considered safe.

From a limited survey of the literature, it appears that methionine-loading tests have been performed on at least 6000 adults without any serious adverse effects being reported, with 1 exception (39). A control (non-Alzheimer's disease) subject in a study of the relation between homocysteine and Alzheimer's disease was given the test, apparently with the usual dose of methionine. However, after 2 h 40 min, she began to vomit and continued for several hours, during which prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine were given. At about 8 h after the methionine was given, she was taken to the emergency room, subsequently became apneic and pulseless, and was admitted to an intensive care unit. After various other complications, she died 30 d after the methionine load was administered. Retrospective measurements of plasma methionine showed it to be about 200 times the baseline value at 2 h after the dose, even higher at 4 h, and 10 times the baseline value after 2 d. Although there was no direct evidence that the dose of methionine was incorrect, the blood analysis data are consistent with a dose approximately 10 times what was intended (i.e., ~70 times the dietary requirement) (8). This is, however, an extreme case, which does not give much indication of the potential for toxicity of methionine at more moderate intakes.

    High methionine intake in infants. There seem to be no direct studies of the effects of methionine intake in infants that give information relating to toxicity. However, a cluster of 10 infants with hypermethioninemia and hyperhomcysteinemia was identified in 1999–2001, with no obvious cause, as cystathionine ß-synthase deficiency and other known reasons for elevated blood methionine were ruled out. A detailed analysis of this occurrence was described by Mudd et al. (40), who concluded that the hypermethioninemia was the result of being given formula with a very high methionine content. Nine of the infants had received 1 formula that had recently been modified to contain more methionine, and the other infant also received formula with a high methionine content. The intakes of methionine were estimated retrospectively to be in the range 125–507 mg/kg per day, compared with the estimated average of 62–97 mg/kg per day. Plasma methionine concentrations were disproportionately elevated, rising as high as 6830 µmol/L, compared with the normal range of 10–40 µmol/L. Despite the severe hypermethioninemia during infancy, no long-term adverse clinical effects of methioninemia were identified among these cases (40).

    Dietary methionine intake and plasma homocysteine. Methionine is an indispensable amino acid and must be supplied from the diet. It is therefore appropriate to ask whether dietary methionine intake affects homocysteine concentration and cardiovascular risk. In a study by Ward et al. (41), healthy men were screened for methionine intake by a food-frequency questionnaire. Those who were in the top quartile of intake were randomly assigned to receive a low-methionine diet for 1 week followed by a control diet for 1 week, or vice versa. Those in the bottom quartile of intake received a high methionine intake for 1 week followed by the control diet, or vice versa. Thus, those subjects in the top quartile of intake reduced their intake by 79%, and those in the lowest quartile doubled their intake. However, the homocysteine concentrations did not alter in response to the changes in dietary methionine intake. The conclusion was that homocysteine concentrations are not responsive to moderate fluctuations in dietary methionine intake. In another study, the same authors measured the response of plasma homocysteine to increasing intakes of methionine (42). A significant increase in plasma homocysteine was seen only when the methionine intake was increased to 5 times the normal intake. These studies provide evidence that moderately high methionine intakes will not lead to hyperhomocysteinemia and subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the effects of methionine loading are also markedly influenced by vitamin status. For example, although treatment with vitamin C before the study did not influence the rise in homocysteine concentration, there was a reduction of the effect on flow-mediated dilatation, suggesting that oxidative stress was involved in the mechanism (33). Similarly, folic acid been shown to be beneficial in reducing the endothelial dysfunction but did not affect the homocysteine concentration (42). Studies have also shown correlations between pre- and post-methionine-load homocysteine levels with vitamin B-12 and folate (43,44).

    Conclusions. Although methionine was labeled as being the most toxic amino acid in relation to growth in animals (1), the evidence in humans does not point to serious toxicity, except at very high levels of intake. Despite the function of methionine as a precursor of homocysteine, and the role of homocysteine in vascular damage and cardiovascular disease, there is no evidence that dietary intake of methionine within reasonable limits will cause cardiovascular damage. A single dose of 100 mg/kg body weight has been shown to be safe, but this dose is about 7 times the daily requirement for sulfur amino acids, and repeated consumption for 1 wk was shown to result in increased homocysteine levels (37,42). Daily doses of 250 mg (i.e., 4 mg/kg per day) are only 25% of the daily requirement and have been shown to be safe. Overall, the literature suggests that the single dose which is typically given in the methionine loading test (100mg/kg/d) does not cause any serious complications, except in the extreme case when a 10-fold excess of methionine appears to have been given, and in patients who have schizophrenia or inborn errors of sulfur amino acid metabolism, such as hypermethioninemia.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Published in a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Presented at the conference "The Fifth Workshop on the Assessment of Adequate Intake of Dietary Amino Acids" held October 24–25, 2005 in Los Angeles. The conference was sponsored by the International Council on Amino Acid Science (ICAAS). The organizing committee for the workshop and guest editors for the supplement were David H. Baker, Dennis M. Bier, Luc Cynober, Yuzo Hayashi, Motoni Kadowaki, and Andrew G. Renwick. Guest editors disclosure: all editors received travel support from ICAAS to attend the workshop. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Benevenga NJ, Steele RD. Adverse effects of excessive consumption of amino acids. Annu Rev Nutr. 1984;4:157–81.[Medline]

2. Irwin MI, Hegsted DM. A conspectus of research on amino acid requirements of man. J Nutr. 1971;101:539–66.[Free Full Text]

3. Clark HE, Woodward L. Influence of variable quantities of methionine on nitrogen retention of adult human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1966;18:100–4.[Abstract]

4. Clark HE, Howe JM, Shannon BM, Carlson K, Kolski SM. Requirements of adult human subjects for methionine and cystine. Am J Clin Nutr. 1970;23:731–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Fisher H, Brush MK, Griminger P. Reassessment of amino acid requirements of young women on low nitrogen diets. II. Leucine, methionine, and valine. Am J Clin Nutr. 1971;24:1216–23.[Abstract]

6. Kies C, Fox H, Aprahamian S. Comparative value of L-, DL-, and D-methionine supplementation of an oat-based diet for humans. J Nutr. 1975;105:809–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Zezulka AY, Calloway DH. Nitrogen retention in men fed isolated soybean protein supplemented with L-methionine, D-methionine, N-acetyl-L-methionine, or inorganic sulfate. J Nutr. 1976;106:1286–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. WHO Technical Report Series No. 935, Geneva: WHO; 2006.

9. Nakagawa I, Takahaski T, Suzuki T, Kobayashi K. Amino acid requirements of children: nitrogen balance at the minimal level of essential amino acids. J Nutr. 1964;83:115–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Graham GG, MacLean WC Jr, Placko RP. Plasma amino acids of infants consuming soybean proteins with and without added methionine. J Nutr. 1976;106:1307–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Fomon SJ, Ziegler EE, Filer LJ Jr, Nelson SE, Edwards BB. Methionine fortification of a soy protein formula fed to infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979;32:2460–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. MacLean WC Jr, Graham GG, Placko RP, De Romana GL. Plasma free amino acids in children consuming lupin protein with and without methionine supplementation. J Nutr. 1983;113:779–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Fomon SJ, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE, Edwards BB. Requirement for sulfur-containing amino acids in infancy. J Nutr. 1986;116:1405–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Stegink LD, Filer LJ Jr, Baker GL. Plasma methionine levels in normal adult subjects after oral loading with L-methionine and N-acetyl-L-methionine. J Nutr. 1980;110:42–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Stegink LD, Schmitt JL, Meyer PD, Kain PH. Effect of diets fortified with DL-methionine on urinary and plasma methionine levels in young infants. J Pediatr. 1971;79:648–55.[Medline]

16. Kaji H, Niioka T, Kojima Y, Yoshida Y, Kawakami Y. Urinary 3-methylthiopropionate excretion and the effect of D- or L-methionine ingestion studied in healthy subjects. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1987;56:101–9.[Medline]

17. Hood VL, LaGrange BM. Impact of methionine on net ketoacid production in humans. Metabolism. 1988;37:573–9.[Medline]

18. Caso G, Garlick PJ. Control of muscle protein kinetics by acid-base balance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:73–6.[Medline]

19. Ballmer PE, McNurlan MA, Hulter HN, Anderson SE, Garlick PJ, Krapf R. Chronic metabolic acidosis decreases albumin synthesis and induces negative nitrogen balance in humans. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:39–45.[Medline]

20. Kleger G-R, Turgay M, Imoberdorf R, McNurlan MA, Garlick PJ, Ballmer PE. Acute metabolic acidosis decreases muscle protein synthesis but not albumin synthesis in humans. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1199–207.[Medline]

21. Fünfstück R, Straube E, Schildbach O, Tietz U. Reinfektionsprophylaxe durch L-Methionin bei Patienten mit einer rezidiverenden Harnweginfektion. [Prevention of reinfection by L-methionine in patients with recurrent urinary tract infection] Med Klin. 1997;92:574–81.

22. Delrieu F, Ferrand B, Amor B. Preliminary study of L-methionine in the treatment of rheumatoid polyarthritis. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1988;55:995–7.[Medline]

23. Meakins TS, Persaud C, Jackson AA. Dietary supplementation with L-methionine impairs the utilization of urea-nitrogen and increases 5-L-oxoprolinuria in normal women consuming a low protein diet. J Nutr. 1998;128:720–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Osmond H, Smythies J. Schizophrenia: a new approach. J Ment Sci. 1952;98:309–15.[Medline]

25. Nestoros JN, Ban TA, Lehmann HE. Transmethylation hypothesis of schizophrenia: methionine and nicotinic acid. Int. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1977;12:215–46.[Medline]

26. Cohen BM, Lipinski JF, Vuckovic A, Prosser E. Blood S-adenosyl-L-methionine levels in psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:229–31.[Free Full Text]

27. Baldessarini RJ, Stramentinoli G, Lipinski JF. Methylation hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36:303–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. McCully KS. Vascular pathology of homosysteinemia: implications for the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1969;56:111–28.[Medline]

29. Kanwar YS, Manaligod JR, Wong PW. Morphologic studies in a patient with homocystinuria due to 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency. Pediatr Res. 1976;10:598–609.[Medline]

30. Murphy-Chutorian DR, Wexman MP, Grieco AJ, Heininger JA, Glassman E, Gaull GE, Ng SK, Feit F, Wexman K, Fox AC. Methionine intolerance: a possible risk factor for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:725–30.[Abstract]

31. Mudd SH. Vascular disease and homocysteine metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:751–3.[Medline]

32. Bostom AG, Jacques PF, Nadeau MR, Williams RR, Ellison RC, Selhub J. Post-methionine load hyperhomocysteinemia in persons with normal fasting total plasma homocysteine: initial results from The NHLBI Family Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 1995;116:147–51.[Medline]

33. Chambers JC, McGregor A, Jean-Marie J, Obeid OA, Kooner JS. Demonstration of rapid onset vascular endothelial dysfunction after hyperhomocysteinemia; an effect reversible with vitamin C therapy. Circulation. 1999;99:1156–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Chambers JC, Obeid OA, Kooner JS. Physiological increments in plasma homocysteine induce vascular endothelial dysfunction in normal human subjects. Arterioscler. Thromb. 1999;19:2922–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Wilkinson IB, Megson IL, MacCallum T, Rooijmans DF, Johnson SM, Boyd JL, Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ. Acute methionine loading does not alter arterial stiffness in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2001;37:1–5.[Medline]

36. Hanratty CG, McGrath LT, McAuley DF, Young IS, Johnston GD. The effects of oral methionine and homocysteine on endothelial function. Heart. 2001;85:326–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. McAuley DF, Hanratty CG, McGurk C, Nugent AG, Johnston GD. Effect of methionine supplementation on endothelial function, plasma homocysteine, and lipid peroxidation. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999;37:435–40.[Medline]

38. Krupková-Meixnerová L, Veselá K, Vítová A, Janosíková B, Andel M, Kozich V. Methionine-loading test: evaluation of adverse effects and safety in an epidemiological study. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:151–6.[Medline]

39. Cottington EM, LaMantia C, Stabler SP, Allen RH, Tangerman A, Wagner C, Zeisel SH, Mudd SH. Adverse event associated with methionine loading test, a case report. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2002;22:1046–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Harvey Mudd S, Braverman N, Pomper M, Tezca K, Kronick J, Jayakar P, Garganta C, Ampola MG, Levy HL, et al. Infantile hypermethioninemia and hyperhomocysteinemia due to high methionine intake: a diagnostic trap. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;79:6–16.[Medline]

41. Ward M, McNulty H, Pentieva K, McPartlin J, Strain JJ, Weir DG, Scott JM.. Fluctuations in dietary methionine intake do not alter plasma homocysteine concentration in healthy men. J Nutr. 2000;130:2653–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Ward M, McNulty H, McPartlin J, Strain JJ, Weir DG, Scott JM. Effect of supplemental methionine on plasma homocysteine concentrations in healthy men: A preliminary study. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2001;71:82–6.[Medline]

43. Usui M, Matsuoka H, Miyazaki H, Ueda S, Okuda S, Imaizumi T. Endothelial dysfunction by acute hyperhomocyst(e)inaemia: restoration by folic acid. Clin Sci. 1999;96:235–9.[Medline]

44. Brattström L. Vitamins as homocysteine-lowering agents. J Nutr. 1996;126:1276S–80S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Chambers JC, Obeid OA, Refsum H, Ueland P, Hackett D, Hooper J, Turner RM, Thompson SG, Kooner JS. Plasma homocysteine concentrations and risk of coronary heart disease in UK Indian Asian and European men. Lancet. 2000;355:523–7.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. B. Pencharz, R. Elango, and R. O. Ball
An Approach to Defining the Upper Safe Limits of Amino Acid Intake
J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 1996S - 2002S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. O. Ball, G. Courtney-Martin, and P. B. Pencharz
The In Vivo Sparing of Methionine by Cysteine in Sulfur Amino Acid Requirements in Animal Models and Adult Humans
J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1682S - 1693S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garlick, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garlick, P. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2006 by American Society for Nutrition