![]() |
|
|




* United States Department of Agriculture, Diet and Human Performance Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705 and
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division, Pathology and Physiology Research Branch, Morgantown, WV 26505
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: harrisk{at}ba.ars.usda.gov.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: luteolin chrysin cyclooxygenase-2 prostaglandin E2 reactive oxygen species
Numerous studies have indicated that diets high in fruits and vegetables, thus high in flavonoids, are inversely associated with cancer and heart disease (13). Other studies specifically examining flavonoid intake have shown similar results (46). The dietary flavones, luteolin and chrysin (Fig. 1), are structurally similar, differing only in that chrysin lacks hydroxyl groups at the 3' and 4' positions on the B ring. Common foods sources of these flavones include broccoli, chili peppers, celery, rosemary, and honey (7,8). Anticarcinogenic and cardioprotective properties have been reported for luteolin and chrysin (911).
|
, interleukins and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). PGE2 formation results from the release of arachidonic acid from cell-membrane phospholipids by phospholipase enzymes and is converted to PGE2 via cyclooxygenase and PGE2 synthase enzymes. LPS-induced release of arachidonic acid, the resulting upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) expression, and PGE2 formation, is mediated through toll-like receptor 4 in the RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cell line (14,15).
LPS-activated macrophages also produce superoxide (
) and hydrogen peroxide. Together, these 2 compounds react to form the hydroxyl radical (HO·) (16). Recent reports have indicated that Cox-2 expression and PGE2 formation are upregulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and their products (17,18). Flavones luteolin and chrysin have been reported to possess antiinflammatory and antioxidant activity in a variety of systems (1922).
In this study, we examined the effects of flavones luteolin and chrysin on Cox-2 expression and PGE2 formation in relation to their effects on the ROS ·
and HO·. We hypothesized that differences in antioxidant activity between the structurally similar luteolin and chrysin would affect Cox-2 expression and PGE2 formation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture and treatment. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in 75 cm2 flasks in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Flavones were dissolved in DMSO immediately before experiments, then added to cell medium.
Cell viability. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a concentration of 109 cells/L. After 24 h of growth, cells were pretreated with 0, 25, 50, or 100 µmol/L luteolin for 2 h, then treated with LPS (1 mg/L) for an additional 12 h. After treatment, cells were assayed for viability using the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT) method described by Mosmann (23).
Western blotting. Cells were grown and treated identically to those used for the MTT assay. Growth medium (used for PGE2 analysis) and cell lysates were stored at 80°C. Lysates were analyzed for protein content using the BCA assay (Pierce Biotechnology). Proteins (30 µg/sample) were separated on 12% Tris-Glycine gels (Invitrogen), transferred to PVDF membranes, and blotted with the appropriate antibodies (goat polyclonal Cox-2, Actin antibodies, and anti-goat AP-linked secondary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; AP-linked anti-rabbit secondary antibody was from Cell Signaling) Protein bands were visualized by immunofluorescence and quantified by densitometry.
PGE2 analysis by ELISA. Media samples were assayed for PGE2 content using a 96-well plate monoclonal ELISA kits (Cayman Chemical) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Superoxide and hydroxyl radicals measurement.
Due to the short half-lives of ·
and HO·, DMPO was used as a radical "trap" for electron spin resonance analyses. A quartet of peaks with hyperfine splitting is characteristic of DMPO/·
adducts, whereas a quartet of peaks in a 1:2:2:1 ratio is characteristic of DMPO/HO· adducts (24). A cell-free xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO) reaction in PBS solution containing the radical spin trap DMPO (200 mmol/L final concentration) was used for the ·
experiments. Luteolin and chrysin (0 or 100 µmol/L final concentrations) were added directly to this system. For HO· measurements, cells were pretreated for 2 h with 0 or 100 µmol/L luteolin or chrysin in 75 cm2 flasks. Cells (109 cells/L) were then suspended in the same phosphate/DMPO buffer as above and treated with LPS (100 mg/L) for 1 h at 25°C. DMPO/·
and DMPO/HO· signals were recorded using a Bruker EMX spectrometer equipped with a flat cell assembly (Bruker BioSpin).
Statistics. Results are representative of at least 3 independent experiments. Results were analyzed using the proc GLM (general linear models) and P-values were determined using the LSmeans function of SAS version 9.0 (Figs. 24). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
|
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cox-2 protein expression. Pretreatment with 25, 50, and 100 µmol/L luteolin reduced Cox-2 expression (P < 0.01) compared with the LPS positive control (Fig. 3A) at all levels. Chrysin pretreatment did not reduce LPS-induced Cox-2 protein expression at any level tested (Fig. 4A).
PGE2 formation. LPS treatment at 1 mg/L induced PGE2 formation (P < 0.0001) compared with untreated controls (Fig. 3B). Pretreatment with 25, 50, and 100 µmol/L luteolin reduced LPS-induced PGE2 formation at all levels tested (P < 0.001). Like luteolin, chrysin inhibited PGE2 formation at all levels tested (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B).
Superoxide and hydroxyl radical formation.
In a cell-free system, 100 µmol/L luteolin, but not chrysin, scavenged X/XO-produced ·
(Fig. 5A) compared with the X/XO only positive control (P < 0.001). Both luteolin and chrysin pretreatment inhibited (P < 0.001) LPS-induced HO· formation in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 5B). Luteolin pretreatment reduced HO· formation to a greater degree than did chrysin (P = 0.003).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in a cell-free system. Thus, our original hypothesis, that differences in flavone antioxidant activity would result in differences of Cox-2 expression and PGE2 formation, was partially disproven. One explanation for the observed differences in Cox-2 inhibition is chrysin's lack of 3', 4' hydroxylation on the "B" ring. Two authors have reported on the effects of flavonoid B ring hydroxylation on Cox-2 expression. Ko et al. (25) reported that 2' or 4' B ring hydroxylation mediated the inhibition of phorbol ester-induced Cox-2 expression by flavanones. Hou et al. (26) reported that the inhibition of LPS-induced Cox-2 expression in RAW 264.7 cells by anthocyanins requires an ortho-hydroxyl group. Accordingly, we observed that luteolin, which possesses 3', 4' hydroxylation, significantly inhibited Cox-2 expression at all levels tested, whereas chrysin did not. A second explanation for chrysin's lack of effect on Cox-2 expression is luteolin's greater antioxidant activity. The structures reported to be essential to flavonoid antioxidant activity include 3', 4' hydroxylation, the presence of a double bond between carbons 2 and 3, and the presence of a carbonyl group on carbon 4 (27). Luteolin possesses these structures and effectively scavenged HO· and ·
, whereas chrysin did not scavenge ·
, and scavenged HO· less effectively than luteolin.
We show here, to our knowledge for the first time, that luteolin and chrysin inhibit LPS-induced HO· production in RAW 264.7 cells. It is unclear whether the effects of luteolin and chrysin on HO· formation are due to antioxidant activity alone, to effects on LPS-induced cell signaling, or to a combination of the two. Other workers have reported that luteolin inhibits HO· formation in cell-free systems, indicating that it possesses the capacity to scavenge HO· (21,28). Based on our observation that chrysin inhibited HO· formation, although not as well as luteolin, B-ring hydroxylation (absent in chrysin) does not appear to be essential for HO· scavenging. Nagao et al. (29) reported that luteolin and chrysin inhibited ·
formation by inhibiting xanthine oxidase activity rather than by scavenging ·
directly. In contrast, we observed that only luteolin inhibited ·
formation. It is unclear whether this was due solely to ·
scavenging or to inhibition of xanthine oxidase as well. Chrysin did not inhibit ·
generation and, therefore, did not appear to have inhibited xanthine oxidase. Martinez et al. (30) reported that ·
upregulates Cox-2 expression and PGE2 formation in LPS-induced mouse peritoneal macrophages. Accordingly, we observed that luteolin, an effective inhibitor of ·
in a cell-free system, inhibited Cox-2 and PGE2 formation in cell culture.
The differential effects of luteolin and chrysin on Cox-2 expression and on HO· and ·
scavenging do not explain their similar effects on PGE2 formation. Based on luteolin's highly significant reduction of Cox-2 expression, this alone may have been sufficient to inhibit PGE2, whereas chrysin may have inhibited PGE2 formation via other mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms. Luteolin and chrysin may also have reduced PGE2 formation independently of their effects on ROS and Cox-2. This idea is supported by the observations that neither complete HO· quenching (neither flavone did this) nor the inhibition of Cox-2 expression (luteolin only) was essential for the inhibition of PGE2 formation. There continues to be debate as to the importance of Cox-2 expression on PGE2 formation. Some reports have indicated that PGE2 formation is regulated via Cox-2 at transcriptional, post-transcriptional, or enzyme activity levels (31,32). Other workers have reported that PGE2 formation is controlled not by Cox-2 but by phospholipase-A2 (33). We observed that both flavones uniformly inhibited PGE2 formation despite chrysin's lack of effect on Cox-2 expression, which suggests that factors other than COX-2 protein expression may have affected PGE2 formation in our study.
The ultimate physiological effects of luteolin and chrysin (with the exception of direct affects on the digestive tract) depend on their bioavailability and achievable concentration in vivo. This, in turn, depends on the solubility of the compounds. Walle et al. (34) estimated the oral bioavailability of chrysin to be between 0.003 and 0.02% in healthy human volunteers. Free luteolin has also been detected (but not quantified) in human serum (35). Ng et al. (36) reported solubilities of 4.34 and 59.95 µmol/L in PBS at 37°C, respectively. Oral administration of luteolin, but not chrysin, was reported to inhibit two inflammatory end points (LPS-induced TNF-
formation and phorbol ester-induced ear edema) in mice (37). Chrysin's low bioavailability and lack of reported biological activity relative to luteolin may thus be a function of its low solubility. Although serum concentrations have not been reported for luteolin and chrysin, the estimated maximum serum concentration for flavonoid aglycones in general is 1 µmol/L (38). For this reason, we chose to use treatments in the micromolar range.
Future studies will examine the mechanisms by which these flavones, with different Cox-2-inhibitory and antioxidant properties, similarly inhibit PGE2 formation. The observations that luteolin, but not chrysin, inhibited Cox-2 expression, and quenched ·
in a cell-free system, coupled with luteolin's more effective scavenging of HO· suggest that these flavones inhibit PGE2 formation via different mechanisms.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: Cox-2, cyclooxygenase-2; DMPO, 5,5 dimethylpyrroline-N-oxide; HO·, hydroxyl radical; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MTT, (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide);
, superoxide; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; ROS, reactive oxygen species. ![]()
Manuscript received 30 November 2005. Initial review completed 26 December 2005. Revision accepted 21 February 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Malin AS, Qi D, Shu XO, Gao YT, Friedmann JM, Jin F, Zheng W. Intake of fruits, vegetables and selected micronutrients in relation to the risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:4138.[Medline]
2. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Albanes D, Beeson WL, van den Brandt PA, Feskanich D, Folsom AR, Fraser GE, et al. Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:100111.[Medline]
3. Bazzano LA, Serdula MK, Liu S. Dietary intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2003;5:4929.[Medline]
4. Le Marchand L. Cancer preventive effects of flavonoidsa review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56:296301.[Medline]
5. Knekt P, Kumpulainen J, Jarvinen R, Rissanen H, Heliovaara M, Reunanen A, Hakulinen T, Aromaa A. Flavonoid intake and risk of chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:5608.
6. Yochum L, Kushi LH, Meyer K, Folsom AR. Dietary flavonoid intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:9439.
7. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Remesy C, Jimenez L. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:72747.
8. Miean KH, Mohamed S. Flavonoid (myricetin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin) content of edible tropical plants. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:310612.[Medline]
9. Taj S, Nagarajan B. Inhibition by quercetin and luteolin of chromosomal alterations induced by salted, deep-fried fish and mutton in rats. Mutat Res. 1996;369:97106.[Medline]
10. Galijatovic A, Otake Y, Walle UK, Walle T. Induction of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1 by the flavonoid chrysin in Caco-2 cellspotential role in carcinogen bioinactivation. Pharm Res. 2001;18:3749.[Medline]
11. Rump AF, Schussler M, Acar D, Cordes A, Theisohn M, Rosen R, Klaus W, Fricke U. Functional and antiischemic effects of luteolin-7-glucoside in isolated rabbit hearts. Gen Pharmacol. 1994;25:113742.[Medline]
12. O'Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG. Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:47383.[Medline]
13. Koenig W. Inflammation and coronary heart disease: an overview. Cardiol Rev. 2001;9:315.[Medline]
14. Qi HY, Shelhamer JH. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling regulates cytosolic phospholipase A2 activation and lipid generation in LPS-stimulated macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3896975.
15. Rhee SH, Hwang D. Murine TOLL-like receptor 4 confers lipopolysaccharide responsiveness as determined by activation of NF kappa B and expression of the inducible cyclooxygenase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:3403540.
16. Johnston RB Jr. Oxygen metabolism and the microbicidal activity of macrophages. Fed Proc. 1978;37:275964.[Medline]
17. Adinolfi C, Doctrow S, Huffman K, Joy KA, Malfroy B, Soden P, Rupniak HT, Barnes JC, Nakamura T. Reactive oxygen species up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2, p53, and Bax mRNA expression in bovine luteal cells. Biochem Soc Symp. 2001;67:1419.
18. Feng L, Xia Y, Garcia GE, Hwang D, Wilson CB. Involvement of reactive oxygen intermediates in cyclooxygenase-2 expression induced by interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:166975.[Medline]
19. Lyu SY, Park WB. Production of cytokine and NO by RAW 264.7 macrophages and PBMC in vitro incubation with flavonoids. Arch Pharm Res. 2005;28:57381.[Medline]
20. Engelmann MD, Hutcheson R, Cheng IF. Stability of ferric complexes with 3-hydroxyflavone (flavonol), 5,7-dihydroxyflavone (chrysin), and 3',4'-dihydroxyflavone. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:295360.[Medline]
21. Cheng IF, Breen K. On the ability of four flavonoids, baicilein, luteolin, naringenin, and quercetin, to suppress the Fenton reaction of the iron-ATP complex. Biometals. 2000;13:7783.[Medline]
22. Romanova D, Vachalkova A, Cipak L, Ovesna Z, Rauko P. Study of antioxidant effect of apigenin, luteolin and quercetin by DNA protective method. Neoplasma. 2001;48:1047.[Medline]
23. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:5563.[Medline]
24. Leonard S, Wang S, Zang L, Castranova V, Vallyathan V, Shi X. Role of molecular oxygen in the generation of hydroxyl and superoxide anion radicals during enzymatic Cr(VI) reduction and its implication to Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2000;19:4960.[Medline]
25. Ko CH, Shen SC, Lin HY, Hou WC, Lee WR, Yang LL, Chen YC. Flavanones structure-related inhibition on TPA-induced tumor promotion through suppression of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases: involvement of prostaglandin E2 in anti-promotive process. J Cell Physiol. 2002;193:93102.[Medline]
26. Hou DX, Yanagita T, Uto T, Masuzaki S, Fujii M. Anthocyanidins inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 expression in LPS-evoked macrophages: structure-activity relationship and molecular mechanisms involved. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;70:41725.[Medline]
27. Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ. Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J Nutr Biochem. 2002;13:57284.[Medline]
28. Shimoi K, Masuda S, Furugori M, Esaki S, Kinae N. Radioprotective effect of antioxidative flavonoids in gamma-ray irradiated mice. Carcinogenesis. 1994;15:266972.
29. Nagao A, Seki M, Kobayashi H. Inhibition of xanthine oxidase by flavonoids. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999;63:178790.[Medline]
30. Martinez J, Sanchez T, Moreno JJ. Regulation of prostaglandin E2 production by the superoxide radical and nitric oxide in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Free Radic Res. 2000;32:30311.[Medline]
31. Barrios-Rodiles M, Tiraloche G, Chadee K. Lipopolysaccharide modulates cyclooxygenase-2 transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally in human macrophages independently from endogenous IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha. J Immunol. 1999;163:9639.
32. Mestre JR, Mackrell PJ, Rivadeneira DE, Stapleton PP, Tanabe T, Daly JM. Redundancy in the signaling pathways and promoter elements regulating cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression in endotoxin-treated macrophage/monocytic cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:397782.
33. Han CK, Son MJ, Chang HW, Chi YS, Park H, Kim HP. Inhibition of prostaglandin production by a structurally optimized flavonoid derivative, 2',4',7-trimethoxyflavone and cellular action mechanism. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28:136670.[Medline]
34. Walle T, Otake Y, Brubaker JA, Walle UK, Halushka PV. Disposition and metabolism of the flavonoid chrysin in normal volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:1436.[Medline]
35. Shimoi K, Okada H, Furugori M, Goda T, Takase S, Suzuki M, Hara Y, Yamamoto H, Kinae N. Intestinal absorption of luteolin and luteolin 7-O-beta-glucoside in rats and humans. FEBS Lett. 1998;438:2204.[Medline]
36. Ng SP, Wong KY, Zhang L, Zuo Z, Lin G. Evaluation of the first-pass glucuronidation of selected flavones in gut by Caco-2 monolayer model. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2004;8:19.[Medline]
37. Ueda H, Yamazaki C, Yamazaki M. Luteolin as an anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic constituent of Perilla frutescens. Biol Pharm Bull. 2002;25:1197202.[Medline]
38. Scalbert A, Williamson G. Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J Nutr. 2000;130:2073S85S.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||