![]() |
|
|


* Department of Human Development and Family Studies, and
Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
2 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: llb15{at}psu.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: dairy calcium intake bone mineral content bone accretion prepubertal girls
Adequate amounts of calcium are essential throughout the life cycle to promote bone and overall health, and to help reduce the risk of osteoporosis (1). Osteoporosis is considered a major public health threat for an estimated 44 million U.S. women and men
50 y old, causing an annual health care cost of $17 billion in 2001 (2). During childhood and adolescence, the increases in bone mass that occur with growth require adequate intakes of calcium and other nutrients provided by milk and milk products. A low dietary intake of calcium during childhood and adolescence may jeopardize achievement of genetically determined peak bone mass (3). Dairy foods are the most important source of dietary calcium, providing more that half of total intake (4). Unfortunately, children and adolescents, especially girls, do not consume the recommended 23 servings of milk and milk products each day (5). As a result of declining milk consumption in recent years, 70% of girls ages 611 y do not meet current calcium recommendations (6).
Numerous randomized controlled trials conducted in children and adolescents showed that higher calcium intakes, whether provided through supplements, fortified foods, or dairy products, increased bone mass during the intervention period compared with unsupplemented controls (722). Some follow-up studies showed that the positive effect of calcium supplementation on bone mineral status disappears after the supplementation period ceases (23,24). However, Bonjour et al. (8) demonstrated that the benefits of increased calcium intake persisted after cessation of the trial.
Conflicting findings were obtained from observational studies assessing relations between usual calcium intakes and bone health using self-reported measures of dietary intake (20,2538). Most of the observational studies were cross sectional, and longitudinal observational studies investigating the long-term relations between usual calcium intakes and bone health in children are limited (20,33,35,37,38).To our knowledge, no other observational studies have investigated the relation between calcium intake over 6 y and total-body bone mineral content (TBBMC)3 and change in TBBMC across middle childhood. In addition, there is no clear evidence concerning the differential influence of dairy and nondairy sources of calcium on bone health.
There is disagreement in the scientific community concerning the appropriate adjustment for bone mineral content (BMC), especially in studies focused on growing children. Researchers differ concerning whether BMC should be adjusted for growth and size, and which adjustments are most appropriate (39,40). Bone health is influenced by multiple factors (e.g., hormonal status), in addition to calcium intake, and the effects of calcium may be obscured during periods of rapid change by other factors affecting bone health, such as during puberty or menopause (41). In the present study, we focused on assessing the effects of calcium intake on bone accretion during a period of rapid growth; for this reason, we chose to adjust for differences in pubertal growth using height velocity. This is particularly problematic when studying a sample that is going through puberty and in which large differences in pubertal status exist (42).
The objective of this study was to examine longitudinally the association between girls' reported usual calcium intake and TBBMC. We hypothesized that at similar height velocities, girls' calcium intake from age 5 to 11 y would be associated with TBBMC at age 11 y. Given that calcium retention starts to increase at age 9 y, we also hypothesized that at similar height velocities, girls' calcium intake at age 9 y would be associated with a change in TBBMC from age 9 to 11 y. Dietary sources of girls' calcium intake were also evaluated.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At entry into the study, participants included 197 5-y-old girls (mean age, 5.4 ± 0.4 y) and their parents; 192 of these families were reassessed 2 y later when the girls were 7 y old (mean age, 7.3 ± 0.3 y). A 3rd assessment with 183 families was conducted 2 y later when the girls were 9 y old (mean age, 9.34 ± 0.3 y), followed by a 4th assessment with 177 families they were age 11 y (mean age, 11.34 ± 0.3 y). This sample includes 151 families with complete data on all measures pertaining to the study. The families who were excluded due to missing data did not differ from those included in the analyses in family income, mothers' education level, fathers' education level, or parents' and daughters' mean BMI.
The eligibility criteria for participation at the time of recruitment included living with both biological parents, the absence of severe food allergies or chronic medical problems affecting food intake, and the absence of dietary restrictions involving animal products. Families were recruited for participation in the study using flyers and newspaper advertisements. In addition, families with age-eligible female children within a 5-county radius received mailings and follow-up phone calls (Metromail). Parents were generally in their mid 30s at the time of recruitment (mothers 35.4 ± 4.8 y; fathers 37.4 ± 5.4 y). Participating families were non-Hispanic white, predominately middle income, with a mean of 15 ± 2 y of education for fathers and mothers. Approximately equal numbers of families reported incomes in the following ranges $20,000$35,000, $35,000$50,000, and >$50,000 when the girls were 5 y old. Parents were slightly overweight at the time of the first measurement with a mean BMI of 26.4 ± 6.05 kg/m2 for mothers, and 28.0 ± 4.35 kg/m2 for fathers. The Pennsylvania State University Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures, and parents provided consent for their family's participation before the study began.
Measures
24-Hour dietary recall. Three recalls were obtained per respondent at each time of measurement; 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day during the summer and fall months were randomly selected over a 2-wk period. Mothers were the primary reporters of girls' intake at each age; girls were asked to be present during all interviews to facilitate the recall process. Interviews were conducted by trained staff at The Pennsylvania State University Diet Assessment Center using the computer-assisted Nutrition Data System for research (NDS-R, Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota). At each wave, data were analyzed using the most current version of the NDS database. When the girls were 5 y old, NDS Version 2.91, Nutrient database version 26, food database 11a (1996) was used, whereas the Nutrient Data System for Research (NDS-R) was used when the girls were 7, 9, and 11 y old. Version 4.01_30 (2000), version 4.02_31 (2001), and version 4.06_34 (2003) were used at age 7, 9, and 11 y, respectively. Food portion posters (2D Food Portion Visual, Nutrition Consulting Enterprises) were used to assist in the estimation of food amounts.
Dietary supplement intake was assessed by additional questions during the 24-h recall. Nutrient data were averaged over 3 d to obtain an estimate of dairy, energy, and calcium intakes. Mean calcium intakes were compared with Adequate Intake recommendations (43). Girls' calcium intakes at ages 5 and 7 y were compared with the recommendations for 4- to 8-y-old children (800 mg/d); at ages 9 and 11 y, intakes were compared with the recommendations for 9- to 13-y-old girls (1300 mg/d). Mean dairy intakes were compared with the dietary guidelines (5), which recommend 3 servings (3 cups) of dairy group foods daily for children who require 6694 kJ/d or more, and 2 servings (2 cups) daily for those with lower energy needs (1 cup equivalent is 1 cup low-fat or fat-free milk or yogurt; 11/2 oz (42.5 g) of low-fat or fat-free natural cheese; 2 oz (57 g) of low-fat or fat-free processed cheese) (5). Dairy, energy, and calcium intakes estimates were based on foods consumed. Calcium intake at each age included intake from multivitamin-mineral supplements, and sources of calcium included dairy foods and other sources, including supplements.
We created an Energy Estimate Requirements (EER) range for girls' 48 and 918 y, in which we used their mean age, weight, height, and physical activity coefficients (sedentary, low active, active, and very active). The range of values in EER reflects possible differences in the physical activity coefficients of participants (44). For girls aged 48 and 918 y, the range of EER was 51598954 and 627611297 kJ/d, respectively.
Body mass index.
Height and weight were measured by a trained staff member following procedures described by Lohman et al. (45). Children were dressed in light clothing and measured without shoes. Height was measured in triplicate to the nearest 0.1 cm using a Shorr Productions stadiometer (Irwin Shorr). Weight was measured in triplicate to the nearest 0.1 kg using a Seca Electronic Scale. BMI-for-age percentiles were calculated using growth charts from the CDC (46). Overweight is defined as a BMI-for-age percentile
85%.
Height velocity. Girls' height velocity was calculated by subtracting height at age 11 y from height at age 9 y. Height velocity is an indicator of the pubertal growth spurt and reflects growth in stature; among girls in this age group, it can serve as an indicator of pubertal growth (47).
Total-body bone mineral content. Girls' TBBMC was assessed at age 9 and 11 y using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. A trained technician obtained measurements with children in a supine position, in light clothing without shoes. Whole-body scans were obtained using a Hologic QDR 4500W (S/N 47261) instrument in the array scan mode. Scans were analyzed using the whole-body software, QDR4500 Whole Body Analysis. The TBBMC was expressed in grams.
In this study, BMC and not bone mineral density (BMD) was used as the outcome measure to assess the relation between calcium intake and bone mass. Because BMD is BMC divided by bone area, density is related to mass and is not a sensitive measure of bone accumulation associated with growth and increase in skeletal size (39,48).
Data analysis
Data were analyzed using SAS (version 8.02); a P-value < 0.05 was used to indicate significant effects. Repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the time effects of girls' height, weight, TBBMC, energy, calcium, and dairy intake. Pairwise comparisons of significant effects were computed using contrast statements. Because the contrast statements are equivalent to multiple t tests, a Bonferroni correction was used to control the overall error rate at P < 0.05 (i.e., individual contrasts were considered significant at P < 0.0127).
The relations between calcium intake across the ages from 5 to 11 y and TBBMC, and between calcium intake and change (
) in TBBMC were assessed using correlational analysis. Spearman correlations were used because variables were not normally distributed, and partial correlations were employed to adjust for height velocity. Partial correlations allowed us to determine the association between calcium intake and TBBMC by removing the effects of height velocity from both calcium intake and TBBMC. During the adolescence growth spurt, calcium retention is greater; therefore, dependence on calcium intake would be greater during this time (3). Additionally, height velocity is one of the determinants of BMC; gain in mass is very rapid during adolescence and up to 25% of peak bone mass is acquired during the 2-y period encompassing the peak growth in height (49).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Few observational studies examined the effects of calcium intake on TBBMC accretion, and the results are controversial (20,35,37,38,53). In agreement with our data, Barr et al. (37) found that calcium intake was associated with a change in TBBMC over 2 y in pubertal girls (ages 912 y). Another 2-y prospective investigation demonstrated that when beverages low in nutrient density replaced milk, adolescent girls had reduced TBBMC accretion (53). Conversely, data reported by Lloyd et al. (35) showed no association between mean calcium intake over 8 y and bone gain during adolescence. Another 1-y prospective study among school-aged children (aged 519 y) in Copenhagen found that size-adjusted BMC accretion was not related to calcium intake (38).
It is possible that our ability to detect an association between calcium intake and TBBMC and change in TBBMC, and the absence of such an association in other studies, resulted from differences in the adjustments applied. To date, researchers differ concerning whether BMC should be adjusted for growth and size (39,40). Unfortunately, results among studies may vary depending on the adjustments applied, thus making it difficult to compare results. According to Heaney (48), using a BMC unadjusted for growth-related variables (i.e., bone area, height, and weight) is the correct approach. If the hypothesis is that calcium influences the amassing of tissue and the increase in its size, adjusting increases in mass for increases in bone area or height would factor out the effects of growth and thus create a variable similar to BMD (48). Because height velocity is an indicator of pubertal status, the most powerful factor influencing growth during this period, and is also one of the determinants of BMC in this study, we adjusted for height velocity.
The low correlations between calcium intake and TBBMC in this study underscore the multifactorial nature of bone health, with calcium intake as only one of those factors. For example, puberty has a powerful effect on bone mass; therefore, it can hide the effects of calcium on bone mass. In addition, calcium is a threshold nutrient (41); thus, the importance of calcium intake is especially evident at intakes below the threshold. Girls who have intakes above the threshold level contribute nothing to the correlation except statistical noise (41). It is possible that the lack of association observed between nondairy calcium and TBBMC was due to the finding that the range in intakes from nondairy calcium was much narrower than the range in dairy calcium.
Consistent with national data (Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and NHANES III) (54,55), in this study, dairy foods were the major food source of calcium (70%), indicating that consumption of dairy foods is critical to meet recommendations for this nutrient. In this study, calcium intake from supplements was included, and the data show that the mean contribution of calcium supplements was very small because a relatively small percentage of the girls used supplements. Our data show that the percentage of girls using calcium supplements was consistent with the percentage of young adults in the United States ages 1824 y using calcium supplements (56).
Although the present study provides the longitudinal data required to address several important questions, the study also has several limitations. The sample is a homogeneous one; girls were prepubertal, non-lactose intolerant non-Hispanic white, and our findings cannot be generalized to other racial or ethnic populations or boys.
To our knowledge, no other observational studies reported the relation between calcium intake over 6 y and TBBMC and change in TBBMC across middle childhood. Most of the data on TBBMC accretion comes from clinical trials assessing the effect of calcium supplementation and fortification, and few long-term observational studies exist that assessed the relation between calcium and TBBMC accretion within the range of usual intakes. In addition, there is no clear evidence on dairy and nondairy sources of calcium and their differential influence on bone health. Furthermore, the longitudinal design of this investigation offers advantages over previous cross-sectional studies by assessing calcium intake by 24-h dietary recall repeatedly over 6 y. The results of cross-sectional studies using 1 or 2 assessments may be inaccurate, given that calcium intake at one point in time may not reflect lifetime calcium intake, and bone mass at one point in time is the result of long-term confounding variables that are not assessed (43).
In conclusion, this research provides confirmatory evidence of the importance of habitual calcium intake, especially calcium from dairy sources, in contributing to bone mass and bone mineral accretion, and attainment of peak bone mass during growth, which is assumed to be a critical factor osteoporosis in later life. The results of the current study suggest that increasing calcium intake among children should continue to be a major focus of interventions. These findings, which showed that
70% of total calcium is obtained from dairy sources, suggest that increasing dairy intake among girls could be an especially effective strategy to increase total calcium intake. The development of dietary habits that include frequent milk intake is likely to lead to higher calcium intake in later years. For example, Fisher and colleagues (34), in a mother-daughter study, concluded that milk availability to the daughters at meals and snacks was associated with meeting calcium recommendations.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; EER, energy estimate requirements; TBBMC, total-body bone mineral content. ![]()
Manuscript received 30 September 2005. Initial review completed 9 November 2005. Revision accepted 6 February 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Miller GD, Jarvis JK, McBean LD. Handbook of dairy and nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000.
2. McCarron DA, Heaney RP. Estimated healthcare savings associated with adequate dairy food intake. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:8897.[Medline]
3. Martin AD, Bailey DA, McKay HA, Whiting S. Bone mineral and calcium accretion during puberty. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:6115.
4. Gleason PM, Suitor CW. Children's diets in the mid-1990s: dietary intake and its relationship with school meal participation. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. Report No. CN-01CD1; 2001.
5. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. Backgrounder 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. Version current 26 August 2004. Internet: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/Backgrounder.htm [cited 27 September 2004]. Available from: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/Backgrounder.htm.
6. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Data Tables: "Results from USDA's 199496 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and 199496 Diet and Knowledge Survey." Riverdale MD: ARS, USDA; February 1999. [cited 9 February 2005]. Available from: www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/pdf/dhks9496.pdf.
7. Stear SJ, Prentice A, Jones SC, Cole TJ. Effect of a calcium and exercise intervention on the bone mineral status of 1618-y-old adolescent girls. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:98592.
8. Bonjour J, Chevalley T, Ammann P, Slosman D, Rizzoli R. Gain in bone mineral mass in prepubertal girls 3.5 years after discontinuation of calcium supplementation: a follow-up study. Lancet. 2001;358:120812.[Medline]
9. Johnston CC. J.Z. M, Slemenda CW, Reister TK, Hui S, Christian C, Peacock M. Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:827.[Abstract]
10. Lloyd T, Andon MB, Nan Rollings RN, Martel JK, Landis R, Demers LM, Eggli DF, Kieselhorst K, Kulin HE. Calcium supplementation and bone mineral density in adolescent girls. JAMA. 1993;270:8414.[Abstract]
11. Chan GM, Hoffman K, McMurry M. Effects of dairy products on bone and body composition in pubertal girls. J Pediatr. 1995;126:5516.[Medline]
12. Bonjour JP, Carrie AL, Ferrari S, Clavien H, Solsman D, Thientz G, Rizzoli R. Calcium-enriched foods and bone mass growth in prepubertal girls: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:128794.[Medline]
13. Lee W, Leung S, Wang S, Xu Y, Zeng W, Lau J, Oppenheimer SJ, Cheng JCY. Double-blind, controlled calcium supplementation and bone mineral accretion in children accustomed to a low-calcium diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:74450.
14. Nowson CA, Green RM, Hopper JL, Sherwin AJ, Young D, Kaymakci B, Guest CS, Smid M, Larkins RG, Wark JDA. Co-twin study of the effect of calcium supplementation on bone density during adolescence. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:21925.[Medline]
15. Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Tsang HS, Lau J, Cheng JCY. A randomized double-blind controlled calcium supplementation trial, and bone and height acquisition in children. Br J Nutr. 1995;74:12539.[Medline]
16. Dibba B, Prentice A, Ceesay M, Stirling DM, Cole TJ, Poskitt E. Effect of calcium supplementation on bone mineral accretion in Gambian children accustomed to a low-calcium diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:5449.
17. Cadogan J, Eastell R, Jones N, Barker M. Milk intake and bone mineral acquisition in adolescent girls: randomized, controlled intervention trial. BMJ. 1997;315:125560.
18. Renner E, Hermes M, Stracke H. Bone mineral density of adolescents as affected by calcium intake through milk and milk products. Int Dairy J. 1998;8:75964.
19. Volek FS, Gomez AL, Scheett TP, Sharman MJ, French DN, Rubin M, Ratamess NA, McGuigan MM, Kraemer WJ. Increasing fluid milk favorably affects bone mineral density responses to resistance training in adolescent boys. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:13536.[Medline]
20. Matkovic V, Landoll JD, Badenhop-Stevens NE, Ha EY, Crncevic-Orlic Z, Li B, Goel P. Nutrition influences skeletal development from childhood to adulthood: a study of hip, spine, and forearm in adolescent females. J Nutr. 2004;134:701S5S.
21. Iuliano-Burns S, Saxon L, Naughton G, Gibbons K, Bass S. Regional specificity of exercise and calcium during skeletal growth in girls: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:15662.[Medline]
22. Matkovic V, Goel P, Badenhop-Stevens NE, Landoll JD, Li B, Ilich JZ, Skugor M, Nagode LA, Mobley SL, et al. Calcium supplementation and bone mineral density in females from childhood to young adulthood: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:17588.
23. Slemenda CW, Peacock M, Hui S, Zhou L, Johnston CC. Reduced rates of skeletal remodeling are associated with increased bone mineral density during the development of peak skeletal mass. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:67682.[Medline]
24. Lee W, Leung S, Leung D, Cheng J. A follow-up study on the effects of calcium-supplement withdrawal and puberty on bone acquisition of children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:717.
25. Chan GM. Dietary calcium and bone mineral status of children and adolescents. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145:6314.[Abstract]
26. Kristinsson JO, Valdimarsson O, Steingrimsdottir L, Sigurdsson G. Relation between calcium intake, grip strength and bone mineral density in the forearms of girls aged 13 and 15. J Intern Med. 1994;236:385390.[Medline]
27. Du XQ, Greenfield H, Fraser DR, Ge K, Lui ZH, He W. Milk consumption and bone mineral content in Chinese adolescent girls. Bone. 2002;30:5218.[Medline]
28. Ilich JZ, Skugor M, Hangartner T, Baoshe A, Matkovic V. Relation of nutrition, body composition and physical activity to skeletal development: a cross-sectional study in preadolescent females. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998;17:13647.
29. Ruiz JC, Mandel C, Garabedian M. Influence of spontaneous calcium intake and physical exercise on the vertebral and femoral bone mineral density of children and adolescents. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:67582.[Medline]
30. Sentipal JM, Wardlaw GM, Mahan J, Matkovic V. Influence of calcium intake and growth indexes on vertebral bone mineral density in young females. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:4258.
31. Uusi-Rasi K, Haapasalo P, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Sievanen H, Oja P, Vuori I. Determinants of bone mineralization in 8 to 20 year old Finish females. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:549.[Medline]
32. VandenBergh MF, DeMan SA, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Trouerbach WT, Grobbee DE. Physical activity, calcium intake, and bone mineral content in children in the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:299304.[Abstract]
33. Lee WTK, Leung SSF, Lui SSH. Relationship between long-term calcium intake and bone mineral content of children aged from birth to 5 years. Br J Nutr. 1993;70:23548.[Medline]
34. Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Mannino ML, Birch LL. Meeting calcium recommendations during middle childhood reflects mother-daughter beverage choices and predicts bone mineral status. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:698706.
35. Lloyd T, Beck TJ, Lin BH, Tulchinsky M, Eggli DF, Oreskovic TL. Modifiable determinants of bone status in young women. Bone. 2002;30:41621.[Medline]
36. Welten DC, Kemper CG, Post GB, Van Mechelen W, Twisk JWR. Weight-bearing activity during youth is a more important factor for peak bone mass that calcium intake. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:108996.[Medline]
37. Barr SI, Petit MA, Vigna YM, Prior JC. Eating attitudes and habitual calcium intake in peripubertal girls are associated with initial bone mineral content and its change over 2 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:9407.[Medline]
38. Molgaard C, Thomsen BL, Fleischer Michaelsen K. The influence of calcium and physical activity on bone mineral content and bone size in healthy children and adolescent. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:88794.[Medline]
39. Heaney RP. Bone mineral content, not bone mineral density is the correct bone measure for growth studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:3501.
40. Prentice AM, Parsons TJ, Cole TJ. Uncritical bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60:83742.
41. Heaney RP. Bone mass, nutrition and other lifestyle factors. Nutr Rev. 1996;54:S310.[Medline]
42. Davison KK, Susman EJ, Birch LL. Percent body fat at age 5 predicts earlier pubertal development among girls. Pediatrics. 2003;111:81521.
43. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin d, and fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
44. Institute of Medicine. Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
45. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.
46. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL. CDC growth charts: United States. Advance data from vital and health statistics. Report No. 314. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2000.
47. Tanner J. Growth at adolescence. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1962.
48. Heaney RP. Measuring bone mass accumulation [letter]. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:341.
49. Bailey DA. The Saskatchewan pediatric bone mineral accrual study: bone mineral acquisition during the growing years. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18(suppl 3):S1914.
50. Faulkner RA, Bailey DA, Drinkwater DT, McKay HA, Arnold C, Wilkinson AA. Bone densitometry in Canadian children 817 years of age. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:34451.[Medline]
51. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and your health: dietary guidelines for Americans. Backgrounder 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. Version current 26 August 2004. Website: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/Backgrounder.htm [cited 27 September 2004]. Available from: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/Backgrounder.htm.
52. Heaney RP. Design considerations for clinical investigations of osteoporosis. In: Marcus R, Kelsey J, Feldman D, editors. Osteoporosis. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001. p. 51332.
53. Whiting S, Healey A, Psiuk S, Mirwarld R, Kowalski K, Bailey DA. Relationship between carbonated and other low nutrient beverages and bone mineral content of adolescents. Nutr Res. 2001;21:110715.
54. Moore C, Murphy MM, Keast DR, Holick MF. Vitamin D intake in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:9803.[Medline]
55. Subar AF, Krebs-Smith SM, Cook A, Kahle LL. Dietary sources of nutrients among US children, 19891991. Pediatrics. 1998;102:91323.
56. Millen AE, Dodd KW, Subar AF. Use of vitamin, mineral, nonvitamin, and nonmineral supplements in the United States: the 1987, 1992, and 2000 National Health Interview Survey results. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:94250.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||