Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. M.
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition J. Nutr. 136:1141-1144, May 2006


Recent Advances in Nutritional Sciences

Malnutrition and Energy Restriction Differentially Affect Viral Immunity1

Barry W. Ritz and Elizabeth M. Gardner2

Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eg25{at}drexel.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Protein-energy malnutrition is associated with a decrease in immunity and an increase in infectious disease. Both of these effects are exacerbated in aging. Conversely, energy restriction (ER) without malnutrition extends the lifespan in animals and retards the age-related decline in various parameters of immune function. Recent evidence suggests, however, that aged ER mice exhibit an increased mortality in response to primary influenza infection compared with age-matched controls. Underweight may contribute to this outcome due to an inability to meet the energy demands associated with the immune response to primary viral infection. The energetic costs of immune responsiveness must be considered in the undernourished aging population and emerging studies of ER in humans.


KEY WORDS: • protein-energy malnutrition • caloric restriction • influenza • underweight • aging

The observed interaction between nutrition and immunity predates both nutrition science and immunology as fields of study. Interest in the influence of undernutrition on the susceptibility to viral infection emerged >200 y ago with the observation that malnutrition appeared to lead to increased infection in some instances and increased resistance to infection in others (1). In time, it was generally accepted that nutritional adequacy in the host could fuel viral replication, whereas any nutritional limitation to the host would interfere with the metabolism of the virus itself (1). More recent studies further explored this host-pathogen interaction, confirming that host nutritional status not only influences host immunity and viral replication, but in doing so also directs the viral genome, thus potentially influencing selective virulence (2). Attention to nutritional status, therefore, is relevant to all aspects of infectious disease, i.e., from infection, through the course of disease and recovery, and on to subsequent infections.

Fifty years ago, Sprunt and Flanigan concluded that "...the effect of malnutrition on the resistance of an animal is dependent upon the state of the animal's nutritional reserves at the time of infection." (1) According to their data, increases in the duration and severity of nutritional depletion, as well as a decrease in fat stores, were correlated with an increase in the susceptibility of mice to influenza infection. Indeed, nearly any experimental deficiency, if severe enough, will result in impaired immunity and an increased incidence of infection (3).

The focus here is on the role of reduced energy intake on immunocompetence, which is a poorly understood process due in part to inconsistent definitions. Table 1 provides a list of relevant terms, typically applied to both the nutritional disturbance and the physiologic condition that results. Although protein-energy malnutrition (PEM)3 and starvation are generally associated with a decrease in immunity and an increased incidence of infectious disease, moderate undernutrition may have less or even an opposite effect on certain aspects of immune function. For example, energy restriction (ER) without malnutrition reduces body weight, extends the lifespan in animals, and retards the age-related decline in a number of general indices of immune function (6), including the antibody response to influenza vaccination (7).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Comparative definitions of terms that are often misused in the literature1

 
This review emphasizes the paucity of data regarding the effect of ER on the immune response to infection. This is important because recent evidence suggests that ER may be detrimental to host defenses when superimposed with a primary influenza infection (8), possibly related to low body weight and insufficient energy stores to meet the metabolic demands of the immune response to infection. We focus on influenza as an experimental model because influenza is one of the best characterized viruses in terms of the effects of age and nutrition on the immune response to viruses. Influenza also remains a substantial public health threat among children and the elderly (9). In general, innate and cell-mediated immunity are more sensitive than humoral immunity to both age (10) and nutrition (3); as a result, they are reviewed in greater detail.

    Aging. A proper examination of the effects of PEM and ER on the immune response to viral infection first requires a brief review of the changes in immunity that are associated with aging (1012) because aging has been the focus of the most consistent and extensive studies on immune dysfunction, and because studies of PEM and ER must be considered in the context of age-matched controls (Table 2). Studied extensively in our laboratory, aged humans exhibit a decrease in antibody titers to influenza vaccination (13). Aging is associated with a slight decrease in total lymphocyte number and an age-associated shift from naïve (CD45RA+) to memory (CD45RO+) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, likely to limit the inducible T-cell response (10,11,14). In mice, basal natural killer (NK) cell function appears to remain intact with advanced age, whereas the inducible NK response decreases (15). This effect is not observed consistently in humans (11). It was postulated that decreased immunity is the reason for the observed increase in morbidity and mortality resulting from infectious agents in the elderly (9,11). However, the effects of aging on immunity are highly heterogeneous among humans, including the healthy elderly, and nutritional status was proposed as one variable that may explain differences in the incidence and pathology of infection (10,11).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Reported effects of aging, protein-energy malnutrition, and energy restriction on immune function1

 
    Protein energy malnutrition (PEM). PEM is a precipitating factor in the incidence of infectious disease, including influenza infection, and infection, in turn, has an adverse bearing on nutritional status (3). PEM is the most common cause of immunosuppression worldwide, and the increase in infectious disease associated with malnutrition is thought to be related to decreased immunity (1618). As in aging, PEM is characterized by a lymphopenia, reduced lymphocyte proliferation in response to mitogenic or antigenic stimulation, decreased cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, altered cytokine production, and reduced antibody response to vaccination (3,10,19,20) (Table 2). PEM is associated with a shift toward increased naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (21). PEM also has a strong negative influence on innate immunity that is exacerbated in elderly humans (10) and aged mice (18).

Protein restriction can lead to compromised immunity, decreased viral clearance from the lungs, and increased mortality in influenza-infected mice (22). PEM often results in wasting (involuntary weight, muscle, and tissue losses), which is associated with a decrease in NK activity in both humans and mice (18). However, NK activity appears to be somewhat resistant to PEM if wasting is avoided (18). Similarly, in a study of experimental PEM without wasting, mice exhibited normal lymphocyte proliferation and antigen presentation (17). These observations suggest the possibility that weight loss is a critical aspect in PEM-related immune dysfunction. Refeeding, with an emphasis on protein and/or micronutrients, produced favorable results in terms of T cell proliferation, IL-2 production, delayed-type hypersensitivity, antibody response, NK activity, and most important, a decreased rate of infection (9,10,19).

    Energy restriction (ER). ER, the phenomenon described as "undernutrition without malnutrition," (23) retards aging and extends average and maximal lifespan, as first demonstrated in rats by McCay et al. in 1935 (24). Although this extension in lifespan is correlated with total energy intake regardless of nutritional composition (25), it is important to note that ER diets are nutritionally enhanced to avoid malnutrition or deficiency. An ER diet (typically 40% restricted in mice) is gradually achieved by underfeeding an isocaloric diet supplemented with protein, vitamins, minerals, and salts, usually at the expense of carbohydrate. Lifelong ER was shown to increase the mean and maximal lifespan of mice by up to ~65 and 50%, respectively, compared with a diet consumed ad libitum (AL) (26). Ongoing studies of nonhuman primates predict a comparable decrease in morbidity and mortality rates (27,28), although it is premature to determine the effects on long-term disease outcome and lifespan.

The extension of lifespan and a reduced incidence of spontaneous tumors in ER rodents promulgated early interest in the potential preservation of immune function by ER (29). ER is generally acknowledged to delay the development of immunity and maintain its function later in life (6). Most studies suggest that ER rodents maintain mitogen-stimulated T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, antibody response, and inducible NK cell activity at an advanced age (6,28) (Table 2). Certain outcomes, such as the lymphopenia and enhanced antibody response to vaccination, which are observed in mice subjected to ER (7,14), have not been confirmed in nonhuman primates (28). ER results in a consistent increase in naïve:memory T-cell subpopulations, possibly related to an increased proportion of functional T cells (14,21,28,30).

ER has produced the most convincing evidence of an increased immune response to influenza (9,31); until recently, however, studies were limited to challenge by influenza vaccine (7). We discovered an anomaly in which aged ER mice are unable to withstand primary influenza infection and die within 4–7 d postinfection (8) (Fig. 1). Due to the early time course and an observed decrease in NK activity in aged ER mice when infected with influenza (8), we suspect that ER mice do not possess the innate immunity to control primary infection while mounting a specific CD8+ T-cell response, a possible effect of ER masked by the limitations of vaccine studies. Previously, ER was shown to diminish basal splenic NK cell activity in mice by ~50%, although NK response to Poly I:C injection was increased to a percentage of cytotoxicity comparable to that in young controls (32).


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1  Weight loss occurs in mice with influenza infection due to a decrease in energy intake and an increase in energy demands. Young and aged mice can lose up to 35% of their body weight and recover from infection, which suggests a critical weight indicative of sufficient energy reserves to recover from infection. Lifelong ER results in a 30% decrease in starting weight that may be only marginally above this critical threshold. In the case of aged ER mice, 100% mortality was observed by d 7 (X), before an adaptive T cell response, suggesting a primary influence of underweight on innate immunity. Adapted from (8).

 
    Underweight. Infection generates a significant energy demand (3); therefore, the availability of energy is likely to play a critical role in the immune response to infection. Infections are associated with the catabolism of protein for the production of energy via gluconeogenesis (3). The activation of cell-mediated immunity includes an increase in glucose uptake, glycolysis, and protein synthesis by T cells to support proliferation, differentiation, cytokine production, and effector function (33). However, although ER was reported to promote gluconeogenesis and decrease glycolysis (34), ER studies to date have ignored the metabolic costs of infection.

Influenza infection results in an anorexia that is believed to be mediated, at least in part, by the cytokine and chemokine milieu (35). As such, weight loss and recovery serve as useful indicators of the severity and course of infection. Our observations suggest that young and aged mice can lose up to 35% of baseline body weight and still recover from influenza infection. Any additional weight loss is not compatible with recovery. Kinetic analyses of weight loss during sublethal influenza infection indicate that the recovery of weight is concomitant with a maximal CD8+ T-cell response and viral clearance (12).

There are clearly stated health risks associated with underweight in humans (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), including compromised immunity (36). Indeed, a history of weight loss is associated with a poor clinical prognosis in hospitalized elderly and may lead to increased infections (37). Prospective and retrospective studies suggest that low or even normal body weight predicts mortality in the elderly, whereas increased weight may have a protective effect (23). If underweight is present at the time of infection with influenza virus, energy stores might not be sufficient to withstand the combined reduction in energy intake and increased energy demand associated with the infection. Aged ER mice are underweight compared with AL mice, such that weight loss during the first 4 d of influenza infection resulted in an average body weight equal to the critical weight that predicts mortality in aged AL mice (8) (Fig. 1). Voluntary ER in humans also results in underweight in some cases (38), although the potential influence of ER on the immune response to viral infection in humans remains entirely unknown.

    Summary. Aging and PEM with wasting are associated with similar and cumulative defects in innate and cell-mediated immunity and an increased incidence of infection. Although the preponderance of evidence suggests that ER maintains immune function at an advanced age, including in response to immunization, more recent data clearly indicate impairment in the immune function of aged ER mice after primary influenza infection. This observation supports the notion that immunization can no longer serve as the sole indicator of the immune response to viruses (12). Further, if applicable to the human circumstance, these data have clear implications for elderly individuals at high risk for reduced energy intake resulting from social, physical, economic, and emotional obstacles to eating (39). Infection is associated with both an increase in energy demands and an anorexia that decreases energy intake. Underweight, therefore, may contribute to a poor prognosis in infection by exacerbating this energy deficit, thus negating the spectrum of health benefits attributed to ER and the maintenance of a low body weight. The potential consequences of underweight in response to infection must be addressed in future proposals on the therapeutic benefits of ER in humans (37,40) and in consideration of the Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE), a series of human clinical trials initiated by the National Institute on Aging in 2002. Immediate action is warranted to determine the metabolic, physiologic, and immune changes associated with ER that may affect the outcome to primary viral infection. Future studies should evaluate the kinetics of innate and cell-mediated immunity, viral clearance, and recovery in ER mice and investigate the effects of refeeding before infection to delineate the roles of weight and energy status on the immune response to primary viral infection.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Drs. Irene Olsen and Donna H. Mueller for their comments and Emilia Ralston for her assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Manuscript received 23 January 2006. Back

3 Abbreviations used: AL, ad libitum; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; ER, energy restriction; NK, natural killer; PEM, protein-energy malnutrition. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Sprunt DH, Flanigan CC. The effect of malnutrition on the susceptibility of the host to viral infection. J Exp Med. 1956;104:687–706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Beck MA, Handy J, Levander OA. Host nutritional status: the neglected virulence factor. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:417–23.[Medline]

3. Scrimshaw NS, SanGiovanni JP. Synergism of nutrition, infection, and immunity: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:464S–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Insel P, Turner RE, Ross D, editors. Nutrition. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2002

5. Shils ME, Olsen JA, Shike M, Ross AC, editors. Modern nutrition in health and disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005

6. Pahlavani MA. Energy restriction and immunosenescence: a current perspective. Front Biosci. 2000;5:d580–7.

7. Effros RB, Walford RL, Weindruch R, Mitcheltree C. Influences of dietary restriction on immunity to influenza in aged mice. J Gerontol. 1991;46:B142–7.

8. Gardner EM. Energy restriction decreases survival of aged mice in response to primary influenza infection. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:688–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Meyer KC. The role of immunity in susceptibility to respiratory infection in the aging lung. Respir Physiol. 2001;128:23–31.[Medline]

10. Lesourd B. Nutrition: a major factor influencing immunity in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2004;8:28–37.[Medline]

11. Murasko D, Gardner EM. Immunology of Aging. In: Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. 5th ed. Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti ME, editors. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003; 35–51.

12. Murasko D, Jiang J. Response of aged mice to primary virus infections. Immunol Rev. 2005;205:285–96.[Medline]

13. Gardner EM, Bernstein ED, Dran S, Munk G, Gross P, Abrutyn E, Murasko D. Characterization of antibody responses to annual influenza vaccination over four years in a healthy elderly population. Vaccine. 2001;19:4610–7.[Medline]

14. Miller R. Age-related changes in T cell surface markers: a longitudinal analysis in genetically heterogeneous mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 1997;96:181–96.[Medline]

15. Plett PA, Gardner EM, Murasko DM. Age-related changes in interferon- alpha/beta receptor expression, binding, and induction of apoptosis in natural killer cells from C57BL/6 mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000;118:129–44.[Medline]

16. Gavazzi G, Herrmann F, Krause K. Aging and infectious diseases in the developing world. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:83–91.[Medline]

17. Redmond HP, Gallagher HJ, Shou J, Daly JM. Antigen presentation in protein-energy malnutrition. Cell Immunol. 1995;163:80–7.[Medline]

18. Ingram KG, Croy BA, Woodward BD. Splenic natural killer cell activity in wasted, protein-energy malnourished weanling mice. Nutr Res. 1995;15:231–43.

19. Lesourd B. Nutrition and immunity in the elderly: modification of immune responses with nutritional treatments. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:478S–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Zhang X, Hillyer LM, Woodward BD. The capacity of non-inflammatory (steady-state) dendritic cells to present antigen in the primary response is preserved in acutely protein- or energy-deficient weanling mice. J Nutr. 2002;132:2748–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Woodward B, Hillyer L, Hunt K. T cells with a quiescent phenotype (CD45RA+) are overabundant in the blood and involuted lymphoid tissues in wasting protein and energy deficiencies. Immunology. 1999;96:246–53.[Medline]

22. Jakab GJ, Warr GA, Astry CL. Alterations of pulmonary defense mechanisms by protein depletion diet. Infect Immun. 1981;34:610–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Mendoza-Nunez VM, Sanchez-Rodriguez MA, Retana-Ugalde R, Vargas-Guadarrama LA, Altamirano-Lozano MA. Undernutrition without malnutrition as a protective factor to prevent DNA damage in the elderly. Nutr Res. 2005;25:271–80.

24. McCay CM, Cromwell MF, Maynard LA. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of the lifespan and ultimate body size. J Nutr. 1935;10:63–79.

25. Masoro EJ. Overview of energy restriction and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005;126:913–22.[Medline]

26. Barger JL, Walford RL, Weindruch R. The retardation of aging by energy restriction: its significance in the transgenic era. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:1343–51.[Medline]

27. Lane MA, Mattison J, Ingram DK, Roth GS. Energy restriction and aging in primates: relevance to humans and possible CR mimetics. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;59:335–8.[Medline]

28. Nikolich-Zugich J, Messaoudi I. Mice and flies and monkeys too: energy restriction rejuvenates the aging immune system of non-human primates. Exp Gerontol. 2005;40:884–93.[Medline]

29. Weindruch R. Dietary restriction, tumors, and aging in rodents. J Gerontol. 1989;44:67–71.

30. Spaulding CC, Walford RL, Effros RB. The accumulation of non-replicative non-functional, senescent T cells with age is avoided in calorically restricted mice by an enhancement of T cell apoptosis. Mech Ageing Dev. 1997;93:25–33.[Medline]

31. Webster RG. Immunity to influenza in the elderly. Vaccine. 2000;18:1686–9.[Medline]

32. Weindruch R, Devens BH, Raff HV, Walford RL. Influence of dietary restrictions and aging on natural killer cell activity in mice. J Immunol. 1983;130:993–6.[Abstract]

33. Matarese G, La Cava A. The intricate interface between immune system and metabolism. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:193–200.[Medline]

34. Yamaza H, Chiba T, Higami Y, Shimokawa I. Lifespan extension by energy restriction: an aspect of energy metabolism. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;59:325–30.[Medline]

35. Van Reeth K. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of influenza. Vet Microbiol. 2000;74:109–16.[Medline]

36. Dirks AJ, Leeuwenburgh C. Energy restriction in humans: potential pitfalls and health concerns. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006;127:1–7.[Medline]

37. Sullivan DH, Patch GA, Walls RC, Lipschitz DA. Impact of nutrition status on morbidity and mortality in a select population of geriatric rehabilitation patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:749–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Fontana L, Meyer TE, Klein S, Hollaszy JO. Long-term calorie restriction is highly effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6659–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Pirlich M, Lochs H. Nutrition in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;15:869–84.[Medline]

40. Heilbronn LK, Ravussin E. Calorie restriction and aging: review of the literature and implications for studies in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:361–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. W. Ritz, I. Aktan, S. Nogusa, and E. M. Gardner
Energy Restriction Impairs Natural Killer Cell Function and Increases the Severity of Influenza Infection in Young Adult Male C57BL/6 Mice
J. Nutr., November 1, 2008; 138(11): 2269 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. Niiya, Sk. Md. F. Akbar, O. Yoshida, T. Miyake, B. Matsuura, H. Murakami, M. Abe, Y. Hiasa, and M. Onji
Impaired Dendritic Cell Function Resulting from Chronic Undernutrition Disrupts the Antigen-Specific Immune Response in Mice
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 671 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. C. Duff and M. L. Galyean
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 823 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, E. M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2006 by American Society for Nutrition