![]() |
|
|
Division of Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: budoff{at}ucla.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: aged garlic extract atherosclerosis cardiovascular electron beam tomography calcification
Calcification and atherosclerosis. Calcium deposition in the walls of coronary arteries is an active process, rather than a simple mineral precipitation in the atheromatous plaque (1). Calcification has been shown to be an early feature of atherosclerotic plaque formation, beginning with fatty-streak formation and continuing throughout the natural history of the plaque (2). In 1959, Blankenhorn reported an association between coronary calcification (CC)4 and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) at autopsy (3). Since then, at least 6 other autopsy studies involving >2500 hearts, have confirmed these initial findings. Several investigators have found a significant correlation between amount of coronary calcium and amount of atherosclerosis. These investigators used measurements of plaque volume rather than stenoses, and demonstrated, through the results of autopsies, that there was a consistent and direct relation between calcium and plaque volume (46). Similarly, in vivo studies have demonstrated a linear relationship between CC and ASCVD plaque burden (7,8). Recently Mintz et al. (9) evaluated patients using intravascular ultrasound and electron beam tomography and found a strong relationship between calcification and plaque burden.
Electron beam computed tomography. There has been great interest in the development of noninvasive imaging techniques to detect the presence or absence of atherosclerosis. One approach that has recently gained particular attention, and is being used in several NIH studies of subclinical atherosclerosis, is CC as measured by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT). As opposed to other noninvasive modalities to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) by focusing on physiologic consequences of coronary obstruction, coronary calcium represents an anatomic measure of plaque burden (10). There is general agreement that CC as measured by EBCT provides a useful measure of atherosclerosis for population studies. It is noninvasive and readily applicable for routine use; it demonstrates sufficient accuracy and reproducibility, and it correlates with angiographic or pathologic evidence of CAD.
The presence of CC is nearly 100% specific for atheromatous coronary plaque. Because both obstructive and nonobstructive lesions have calcification present in the intima, CC is not specific to obstructive disease (11). Studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between coronary-artery calcium as measured by EBCT and histologic (12,13) and in vivo intravascular ultrasound (14) measures of atheromatous plaque. In a multicenter study, it has been demonstrated that CC by EBCT correlates well with angiographic stenosis (15), with progressively higher scores found in nonobstructive, and 1-, 2- and 3-vessel obstructive CAD. Guerci et al. (16) demonstrated a strong correlation between the square root of the total EBCT calcium score and maximum percent luminal coronary stenoses in a small group of asymptomatic patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Rumberger (17) analyzed studies of symptomatic patients and demonstrated calcium scores with 90% specificities for variable degrees of angiographic stenosis. Thus, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic populations, correlative studies have demonstrated a relationship between the CC score and the severity of underlying disease.
The most powerful information regarding the utility of the EBCT calcium score relates to its prognostic ability regarding cardiovascular events. The greatest potential for coronary calcium detection is as a marker of coronary heart disease risk. A number of large studies have reported that the presence of CC is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease risk after controlling for coronary heart disease risk factors (1821). In all studies to date, the extent of CC was an independent and incremental estimator of coronary events over and above age, gender, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These studies demonstrate that persons with significant CC (scores >100) have a 10- to 20-fold greater risk of future coronary events. Published guidelines state that "[t]he resulting calcium score is an important parameter to detect asymptomatic individuals at high risk for future CVD [cardiovascular disease] events, independent of the traditional risk factors" (22). Numerous professional organizations, including the National Cholesterol Education Panel, American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology, in both guidelines and expert consensus documents, have extended the recommendation for its use in clinically selected intermediate coronary heart disease risk patients (e.g., those with a 1020% Framingham 10-y risk estimate) to refine clinical risk prediction (2327).
EBCT calcium scanning has achieved a substantial degree of standardization, allowing for use in randomized trials and across centers. It possesses an ease of implementation sufficient to make it applicable to population-based and multicenter studies of ASCVD. The reproducibility of calcium measurements is essential to assess progression or regression of disease and to conduct longitudinal studies. EBCT inter-scan, inter- and intraobserver variability has been extensively studied, with reproducibility varying from moderate (28) to excellent (2931) (r = 0.960.99). With excellent inter- and intraobserver variability (
13%), this test can measure plaque burden and follow atherosclerosis over time. Using new gating algorithms, EBCT inter-scan variability has been shown to be
11% (32). Furthermore, with its ability to estimate total plaque burden, the tool has been demonstrated to be ideal for measuring the progression, stabilization, or regression of coronary plaque noninvasively.
Several studies have demonstrated a decrease in EBCT-measured calcium volume in patients treated with statin drugs (33). Callister enrolled 149 patients with hypercholesterolemia who underwent 2 EBCT scans after a minimum of 12 mo. Sixty percent of the subjects, having achieved LDL reductions to <120 mg/dL, showed EBCT stabilization (regression or no increase) of coronary atherosclerosis compared with subjects whose LDL cholesterol was not reduced to <120 mg/dL (P < 0.001). A second study followed 274 patients with various cardiovascular risk factors who were scanned twice at least 1 y apart. Of 123 patients with hyperlipidemia, 61 were on statin therapy, and 62 reported no therapy. Those patients reporting use of a statin had an annual progression rate of 16%, compared with a 39% annual increase in the EBCT score for the untreated group (P < 0.01) (34). In large studies of progression, annual changes in calcium scores measured by EBCT predict the progression of CAD; EBCT-measured progression of CC ([ > ]15% per year) is associated with a 13-fold greater risk of cardiac events (35,36).
Garlic and atherosclerosis. Several clinical reports, including meta-analyses, have revealed cholesterol-lowering effects of garlic supplementation in humans (37,38). Such reports have strongly affected public awareness of the cholesterol-lowering effect of garlic. Recent studies of aged garlic extract (AGE) have shown it to be a modulator of multiple cardiovascular risk factors (39), such as blood pressure, platelet aggregation and adhesion, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, LDL oxidation, smoking-caused oxidative damages, and directly suppressed atherosclerosis (4043). In addition, AGE has been demonstrated to improve endothelial function (44), inhibit endothelial cell damage, and transform smooth muscle cells (45). This suggests that AGE may have an effect on controlling arterial function through inhibiting the damage of nitric oxide synthesis (46). Thus, garlic and extracts have been postulated to impart cardiovascular benefits through multiple mechanisms.
We performed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized pilot study to determine whether the atherosclerotic plaque burden detected by electron beam tomography will change at a different rate under the influence of AGE as compared with a placebo (47). Twenty-three high-risk patients were enrolled, and 19 (14 men, 5 women, with a mean age of 59.9 ± 10.5 y) completed the 1-y study protocol. Subjects received 4 mL of AGE (1200 mg) or the equivalent amount of placebo. All patients were on, and maintained, a stable course of statin therapy and aspirin during the course of the study. Of the 19 patients who completed the study protocol, 9 were randomized to AGE, and 10 to placebo. S-allyl cysteine, one of the active compounds of AGE, was measured in the blood as a compliance marker. S-allyl cysteine serum measurement is currently the only reliable human compliance marker used for studies involving garlic consumption, since it is detectable and quantitatively increases in the blood after oral intake of garlic capsules (48).
The mean change and absolute difference in the calcium score (volumetric method) for the AGE group was 7.5 ± 9.4% and 45.2 ± 57.2 over the year, respectively. The placebo group exhibited a mean increase in calcium scores of 22.2 ± 18.5% and 129.0 ± 102.1, significantly greater than the treated cohort (P = 0.046 and 0.045, respectively). All patients in this study were on statin therapy; thus the improvement seen under the influence of garlic suggests incremental benefit to statin therapy in this small study. The study shows that patients on placebo (with statin baseline therapy) progressed at a rate of 22.2% per y, while the addition of AGE reduced progression to 7.5%. Calcium scores did not correlate with measures of glutathione and lipid peroxidation at entry. Lipid peroxidation significantly decreased at follow-up period in both groups. Although the homocysteine changes did not achieve significance in this small study, there was a favorable trend.
Changes in baseline values over 1 y as observed under the influence of both AGE and placebo are shown in Table 1. All patients were taking a stable dose of statin and aspirin throughout the study. There were no significant changes in cholesterol parameters, homocysteine or C-reactive protein between the groups, although there was a trend toward improvement of cholesterol parameters and homocysteine (P = 0.070.09 for these measures, Table 1). There was also a trend (not significant) toward decreasing cholesterol/HDL ratios (P = 0.076).
|
|
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author disclosure: M. Budoff has been awarded research grants from Wakunaga of America, Ltd. and received an honorarium for serving as co-chair of the conference. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: AGE, aged garlic extract; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; CC, coronary calcification; EBCT, electron beam computed tomography. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Libby P, Schoenbeck U, Mach F, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Current concepts in cardiovascular pathology: the role of LDL cholesterol in plaque rupture and stabilization. Am J Med. 1998;104:14S8S.[Medline]
2. Ross R. Atherosclerosisan inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:11526.
3. Blankenhorn DH, Stern D. Calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1959;81:7727.[Medline]
4. Beadenkopf WG, Daoud AS, Love BM. Calcification in the coronary arteries and its relation of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1964;92:86571.[Medline]
5. Eggen DA, Strong JP, Mcgill HC. Coronary calcification: relationship to clinically significant coronary lesions and reace, sex and topographic distribution. Circulation. 1965;32:94855.
6. McCarthy JH, Palmer FJ. Incidence and significance of coronary artery calcification. Br Heart J. 1974;36:499506.
7. Sangiorgi G, Rumberger JA, Severson A, Edwards WD, Gregoire J, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS. Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:12633.
8. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium areas by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: a histopathologic correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92:215762.
9. Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Popma JJ, Kent KM, Satler LF, Bucher TA, Leon MB. [REMOVED ADVANCE FIELD]Determinants and Correlates of Target Lesion Calcium in Coronary Artery Disease: A Clinical, Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:26874.[Abstract]
10. Baumgart D, Schmermund A, Goerge G, Haude M, Ge J, Adamzik M, Sehnert C, Altmaier K, Groenemeyer D, et al. Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:5764.[Abstract]
11. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Breen FJ, Schwartz RS. Electron beam CT coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiography luminal stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:15428.[Abstract]
12. Detrano R, Tang W, Kang X, Mahaisavariya P, McCrae M, Garner D, Peng SK, Measham C, Molloi S, et al. Accurate coronary calcium phosphate mass measurements from electron beam computed tomograms. Am J Card Imaging. 1995;9:16773.[Medline]
13. Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froelich J, Feuerstein JM, Proschan MA, Doppman JL. Coronary artyery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology. 1994;192:61923.
14. Baumgart D, Schmermund A, Goerge G, Haude M, Ge J, Adamzik M, Sehnert C, Altmaier K, Groenemeyer D, et al. Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:5764.[Abstract]
15. Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, Agatston AS, Kennedy J, Wolfkiel C, Stanford W, Shields P, Lewis RJ, et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease- a multicenter study. Circulation. 1996;93:898904.
16. Guerci AD, Spadaro LA, Popma JJ, Goodman KJ, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Lerner G, Vizza RF. Relation of coronary calcium score by electron beam computed tomography to arteriographic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:12833.[Medline]
17. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Breen FJ, Schwartz RS. Electron beam CT coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiography luminal stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:15428.[Abstract]
18. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2004;291:2105.
19. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003;228:82633.
20. Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Devries SS, Chomka EV, Liu K. Electron beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events. A 37- month follow-up of 5, 635 initially asymptomatic low-to intermediate risk adults. Circulation. 2003;107:25716.
21. Arad Y, Goodman K, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Coronary calcification, coronary risk factors, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. The St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:15865.
22. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, Brotons C, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, Ebrahim S, Faergeman O, Graham I, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:160110.
23. Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemnma GP, Bond MG, Clark LT, Criqui MH, Crouse JR, Friedman L, Fuster V, et al. Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation. 2000;101:E1622.
24. Hecht HS. Practice guidelines for electron beam tomography: A teport of the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:7056.[Medline]
25. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB, Jr., Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Jr., Stone NJ. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:22739.
26. Taylor AJ, Merz CN, Udelson JE. 34th Bethesda Conference: Executive summarycan atherosclerosis imaging techniques improve the detection of patients at risk for ischemic heart disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:18602.
27. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Budoff MJ, Flamm SD, Hundley WG, Marwick TH, Mosca L, Patel AR, et al. Role of non-invasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: American Heart Association consensus statement statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005;111:68296.
28. Wang S, Detrano RC, Secci A, Tang A, Doherty TM, Puentes G, Wong N, Brundage BH. Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image acquisition protocols. Am Heart J. 1996;132:5508.[Medline]
29. Kaufmann RB, Sheedy PF, Breen JF, Kelzenberg JR, Kruger BL, Schwartz RS, Moll PP. Detection of heart calcification with electron beam CT: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for scoring quantification. Radiology. 1994;190:34752.
30. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:82732.[Abstract]
31. Shields JP, Mielke CH, Rockwood TH, Short RA, Viren FK. Reliability of electron beam CT to detect coronary artery calcification. Am J Card Imaging. 1995;9:626.[Medline]
32. Mao S, Bakhsheshi H, Lu B, Liu SC, Oudiz RJ, Budoff MJ. Effect of ECG triggering on reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring. Radiology. 2001;220:70711.
33. Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ. Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:19728.
34. Budoff MJ, Grassman BO, Bakhsheshi H, Friedman BC, Brundage BH. Rates of progression of coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography. Circulation. 1998;98:1656.
35. Raggi P, Cooil B, Shaw LJ, Aboulhson J, Takasu J, Budoff M, Callister TQ. Progression of coronary calcium on serial electron beam tomographic scanning is greater in patients with future myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:8279.[Medline]
36. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Shaw LJ. Progression of coronary artery calcium and risk of first myocardial infarction in patients receiving cholesterol-lowering therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:12727.
37. Neil HA, Silagy CA, Lancaster T, Hodgeman J, Vos K, Moore JW, Jones L, Cahill J, Fowler GH. Garlic powder in the treatment of moderate hyperlipidaemia: a controlled trial and meta-analysis. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996;30:32934.[Medline]
38. Warshafsky S, Kamer RS, Sivak SL. Effect of garlic on total Cholesterol, a meta- analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:599605.
39. Steiner M, Kham AH, Holbert D, Lin RIS. A double-blind crossover study in moderately hypercholesteremic men that compared the effect of aged garlic extract and placebo administration on blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64:86670.
40. Campbell JH, Efendy JL, Smith NJ, Campbell GR. Molecular basis by which garlic suppresses atherosclerosis. J Nutr. 2001;131:1006S9S.
41. Steiner M, Li W. Aged garlic extract, a modulator of cardiovascular risk factors: a dose-finding study on the effects of AGE on platelet functions. J Nutr. 2001;131(3s):980S4S.
42. Rahman K, Billington D. Dietary supplementation with aged garlic extract inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation in humans. J Nutr. 2000;130:26625.
43. Lau BH. Suppression of LDL oxidation by garlic. J Nutr. 2001;131:985S8S.
44. Pittler MH, Ernst E. Complementary therapies for peripheral arterial disease; systematic review. Atherosclerosis. 2005;181:17.[Medline]
45. Ho SE, Ide N, Lau BH. S-allyl cysteine reduces oxidant load in cells involved in the atherogenic process. Phytomedicine. 2001;8:3946.[Medline]
46. Morihara N, Sumioka I, Moriguchi T, Uda N, Kyo E. Aged garlic extract enhances production of nitric oxide. Life Sci. 2002;71:50917.[Medline]
47. Budoff MJ, Takasu J, Flores FR, Niihara Y, Lu B, Lau BH, Rosen RT, Amagase H. Inhibiting progression of coronary calcification using aged garlic extract in patients receiving statin therapy: a preliminary study. Prev Med. 2004;39:98591.[Medline]
48. Steiner M, Lin RI. Changes in platelet function and susceptibility of lipoproteins to oxidation associated with administration of Aged Garlic Extract. J. Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31:9048.[Medline]
49. Libby P, Schoenbeck U, Mach F, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Current concepts in cardiovascular pathology: the role of LDL cholesterol in plaque rupture and stabilization. Am J Med. 1998;104:14S8S.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Charlson and M. McFerren Garlic: What We Know and What We Don't Know Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2007; 167(4): 325 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||