![]() |
|
|
Business Unit Biosciences, TNO Quality of Life, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: miriam.verwei{at}tno.nl.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The serum profile of a nutrient after consumption of food products is the result of many processes in the human body. The most important ones include the release of the nutrient from the food matrix during gastrointestinal (GI)1 passage and digestion (i.e., bioaccessibility), transport through the intestinal wall and, subsequently, distribution and metabolism in, and elimination from, the body. All these successive processes can be studied in separate in vitro experiments of which the data give a prediction of the kinetic parameters of a compound in vivo. These in vitro data can be used as input for a kinetic mathematical (in silico) model to predict bioavailability and serum profiles of a compound after single or multiple oral doses.
The current article describes a case study in which the bioavailability of folate from fortified milk products was studied using in vitro methods and kinetic modeling (Fig. 1). Several folate-fortified milk products were tested in TNO's gastrointestinal model (TIM). This in vitro dynamic gastrointestinal model simulates the human physiological conditions in the digestive tract (1). In the TIM system, the bioaccessible fractions of folate from milk products were determined (2,3). These fractions of folate are released from the food matrix in the lumen of the GI tract and are available for absorption. Subsequently, the transport of folate through the intestinal wall was examined using cultured monolayers of human colon carcinoma (Caco-2) cells (4). Monolayers of Caco-2 cells are a commonly used in vitro model to study human intestinal absorption (5,6). After absorption from the intestinal lumen, folate is distributed and metabolized in the body, a process previously described (7–9). These parameters determined in in vitro studies with the TIM system and Caco-2 cells were used in a kinetic model describing folate kinetics in the human body. This kinetic model would make it feasible to predict serum concentrations, reflecting folate status.
|
The aim of this article is to evaluate and apply an integrated in vitro-in silico approach to predict human serum concentrations of folate after multiple doses over a certain time period. We compared predicted blood folate concentrations with measured folate concentrations from a human intervention study in which the subjects consumed unfortified control milk, folic acid–fortified ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk or pasteurized milk for 4 wk (10). Application of this integrated methodology would be a cost- and time-efficient way to develop novel and fortified foods with high nutritional quality.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
![]() |
where dQ/dt = permeability rate (mol/s), A = surface area of the filter insert (1.1 cm2), and C0 = initial concentration (mol/mL).
The transport of folic acid was slightly higher than that of 5MTHF, i.e., 1.7 x 10–6 cm/s and 1.4 x 10–6 cm/s, respectively (4). It was found that the intestinal transport of folic acid and 5MTHF was dependent on the extent of binding to FBP at the luminal side of the intestinal cells (4). Combining the results of both in vitro models, we used the (FBP–) unbound folic acid and 5MTHF values that were determined in the TIM system (Table 1) and the Papp values of the unbound folic acid and 5MTHF determined in the Caco-2 cells as input for the kinetic model. This represents the bioaccessibility and intestinal transport, respectively (Fig. 1).
After intestinal absorption, folate is distributed over the different tissues in the human body, metabolized (especially in the liver) and partly excreted from the body. Published data on distribution, metabolism, and excretion of folate (7,8) were used as input for the kinetic model (Fig. 1).
Description of the kinetic model. A kinetic model for folate kinetics in humans was constructed in Advanced Continuous Simulation Language (ACSL, AEgis Technologies) using the kinetic parameters obtained from the in vitro studies and from the literature, as described above.
The kinetic model describes the residence time of the food in each individual segment of the upper GI tract (stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) in relation to gastric emptying and intestinal transit time of a meal with a glass of milk. This is in line with the transit time that was simulated in the TIM system for the milk products. The rate of absorption of folate from the individual intestinal segments over time was mathematically described in the kinetic model by combining the data from the TIM and Caco-2 cell experiments, the residence time of the food in each individual segment, and the biological data about the absorptive area of each intestinal segment (12). Absorptive area of the segments was calculated by multiplying the segment length with the estimated segment circumference. The lengths of the individual human intestinal segments are 25, 260, 395 cm, respectively (12). The absorptive area of the small intestine is enlarged by the folding of the mucosa, i.e., a factor 3 for duodenum and jejunum and a factor 2 for ileum. The resulting total absorptive areas for duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, as used in the kinetic model, were 12, 122, 124 decimeter (dm)2, respectively, which is consistent with earlier published values for total absorptive areas of small intestine (12).
The rate of absorption of folate was determined by first calculating the transfer coefficient of folate (5MTHF or folic acid) across the intestinal wall for each individual intestinal segment (Eq. 1) and subsequently, the transport rate of the bioaccessible fraction from the intestinal lumen (Eq. 2). The kinetic model consists of separate mathematical equations for the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum segments. Total input rate of folate from the small intestine to the blood (serum compartment, Fig. 1) was calculated by summarizing the transport rates of folate across the individual intestinal segments (Eq. 3).
![]() | (Eq. 1) |
where KSi is the transfer coefficient of folate across the absorptive area (L/h) of the intestinal segment, Papp is the apparent permeability value (dm/h) derived from Caco-2 studies, and ASi is the absorptive surface area (dm2) of the individual intestinal segment (duodenal, jejunum or ileum).
![]() | (Eq. 2) |
where RWSi is the rate of transfer of folate (nmol · L–1 · h–1) across the wall of the intestinal segment, KSi is the transfer coeffient of folate (from Eq. 1), SiL is the luminal concentration of folate in the intestinal segment (nmol/L), and FuSi is the fraction unbound in the intestinal segment.
![]() | (Eq. 3) |
where RINP is the total input rate from intestinal lumen to blood and
RWSi refers to the sum of the folate transfer (nmol · L–1 · h–1) from the individual segments.
The amount of folate that enters the blood over time is distributed between blood and the various organs in the human body, represented in the kinetic model by a fast and a slow folate compartment (Fig. 1). These compartments are connected with rate constants k1 to k4 (/h) to describe the distribution between these compartments and the elimination rate constant kel (/h), which describes the elimination of folate from the human body (urinary excretion). The rate constants reflect the half-life in the serum compartment and in the fast and slow compartments, which were estimated to be 2 h, 7 d, and 100 d, respectively. These estimated values were based on serum folate concentrations measured in human studies in which subjects received single or repeated folate doses (7,8). The values of the rate constants k1, k2, k3, k4, and kel, as used in the kinetic model, were 0.29, 0.017, 0.055, 5.7 x 10–5 and 4.2 x 10–4/h, respectively.
The kinetic model was initially fit to correctly describe baseline serum folate concentrations (9 nmol/L) in humans after consumption of
200 µg/d of folate, which is the mean dietary folate intake of the Dutch population (13). The bioavailability of folate from different meals was found to range between 50 and 90% (14–16). In the kinetic model, the bioavailability of folate from the daily meals (without the fortified milk products) responsible for the baseline serum folate concentrations was set to a mean of 70% and was distributed evenly over the day. The serum baseline concentration was described by fitting the size and interaction of the compartments to this baseline concentration of 9 nmol/L at a mean intake of 200 µg/d of folate via the meals.
Evaluation of the kinetic model in comparison to a human trial. After fitting the kinetic model to baseline concentrations of folate, the response in serum folate concentrations at additional daily consumption of folic acid-fortified milk products was predicted and compared with the results of a human intervention study. In the intervention study, the volunteers consumed a strictly controlled daily (folate-deficient) diet containing 140 µg of folate in combination with either control milk or folic acid–fortified UHT milk or pasteurized milk, resulting in additional daily intakes of 20, 201, and 233 µg of folate, respectively (10). The serum folate concentrations were analyzed at the start and at the end of a 4-wk intervention period.
The control and folic acid–fortified milk products used in the human trial were the same as those tested in the TIM system (2). The bioaccessible fractions of folic acid (Table 1) were incorporated in the kinetic model together with the intestinal transport rate (Papp value) across the Caco-2 cells (4).
Application of the kinetic model for various fortified milk products. Finally, the in vitro/in silico approach was used to predict folate serum concentrations when different types of milk products, fortified with folic acid or 5MTHF with and without FBP supplementation, were consumed for 4 wk in combination with a daily basic diet containing 200 µg of folate.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Application of the kinetic model for various fortified milk products. After the evaluation of the kinetic model, we used it to predict serum folate concentrations for the daily consumption of various fortified dairy products (200 µg folic acid or 5MTHF/d) with or without an equimolar amount of FBP, in combination with a diet containing 200 µg of folate. The folate bioaccessibility data of the fortified dairy products were based on the results of duplicate experiments in the TIM system (2,3) (Table 1). After 4 wk, the serum folate concentrations were predicted to increase from a baseline serum concentration of 9.2 nmol/L to 15.6 nmol/L for yogurt fortified with folic acid and FBP and to 17.4 nmol/L for UHT milk fortified with folic acid and yogurt fortified with folic acid. This corresponds to a 70–89% increase in steady-state serum folate concentrations (Fig. 4).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The in vitro/in silico approach was evaluated by comparing the predicted serum folate concentrations with those determined in a human intervention study with the same control and fortified products. In this in vivo study, the subjects received unfortified milk (20 µg folate/d) or folic acid–fortified milk (201–233 µg folate/d) in combination with a strictly controlled folate-deficient diet (140 µg of dietary folate/d) (10). After 4 wk of intervention, the folate response in serum concentrations was determined in the human volunteers. The serum concentrations in subjects consuming unfortified pasteurized milk for 4 wk decreased from 9.3 ± 2.1 to 7.5 ± 1.8 nmol/L (10). The decrease in serum folate concentration was a result of the lower dietary folate intake (140 µg) from meals and drinks during the study than from intake before the study [
200 µg, corresponding to the mean daily folate intake of the Dutch population (13)]. The decline in serum folate was correctly predicted by the kinetic model (Fig. 3). The serum concentrations of the human volunteers consuming folate-fortified UHT or pasteurized milk for 4 wk increased from 8.6 ± 3.3 nmol/L and 9.1 ± 2.4 nmol/L prior to the study to 14.1 ± 5.3 nmol/L and 13.9 ± 3.9 nmol/L after the intervention (10). These serum folate concentrations are 85–88% higher compared with the baseline concentration of 7.5 nmol/L after intervention in which the subjects received fortified milk products combined with a folate-deficient diet. These increased serum concentrations appeared to be correctly predicted by the kinetic model using the data from the in vitro studies with the gastrointestinal model and Caco-2 cells on bioaccessibility and intestinal transport (Fig. 3). Therefore, the kinetic in vitro/in silico approach can be used to predict accurately the serum folate concentrations after short- or long-term consumption of folate-rich food products.
The integration of results from in vitro studies and kinetic modeling was subsequently used to determine what combination of dairy product, type of folate fortification, and FBP supplementation will lead to the highest increase in serum folate response after a 4-wk daily consumption. For simulations with the kinetic model, the results on bioaccessibility of folic acid and 5MTHF with and without FBP were used that were obtained from in vitro studies with the gastrointestinal model (2,3). The in silico simulations indicated that consumption of UHT milk or yogurt fortified with folic acid leads to the greatest increase (89%) in serum folate concentration. Due to processing of these dairy products, endogenous FBP was no longer present in UHT milk and yogurt (19). Thus, in these products, the bioavailability of folic acid was not decreased as a result of its binding to FBP. The addition of FBP to yogurt fortified with folic acid led to a lesser rise (70%) in serum folate concentrations. FBP also decreased the bioavailability of folic acid from pasteurized and UHT-treated milk. These results confirmed that supplementing yogurt, UHT milk, and pasteurized milk with folic acid is an efficient strategy to enhance the folate status of humans. However, based on our results, we recommend that FBP not be added to folic acid-fortified dairy products because doing so will lower the bioavailability of folic acid and thus counteract the effect of fortification.
5MTHF as a supplement has a few practical limitations, such as a lower stability than folic acid without the presence of FBP (20). Nevertheless, the kinetic model also predicts that the daily intake of 5MTHF-fortified milk products will significantly increase the folate serum concentrations of humans. The rise in serum concentrations after ingesting 5MTHF-fortified pasteurized milk (84%) and yogurt (83%) is comparable to those of folic acid–fortified pasteurized milk (86%) and yogurt (89%). A similar increase in serum folate concentrations after administration of folic acid or 5MTHF was also demonstrated in a long-term human intervention study (21). After 24 wk of the daily consumption of 208 µg 5MTHF, 416 µg 5MTHF, or 400 µg folic acid, an increase of 13.3 nmol/L, 22.2 nmol/L, and 20.3 nmol/L in plasma folate concentrations was measured, respectively (21). Simulations with the kinetic model predicted an increase in serum folate concentration of 12.3 nmol/L, 22.3 nmol/L, and 22.8 nmol/L, respectively. It should be noted that our model does not distinguish among the individual folate compounds with regard to their distribution in and elimination from the human body. This could be a limitation of the model insofar as previous work demonstrated a difference in kinetic behavior and distribution of folic acid and reduced folates (16). In addition, the model could be extended by a detailed mathematical description of folate metabolism in the human body (9,22).
FBP supplementation to stabilize 5MTHF in fortified pasteurized milk did not negatively affect the increase of the serum folate concentrations (Fig. 4). However, the FBP supplementation of 5MTHF-fortified yogurt inhibited the increase of the serum folate concentrations. The prediction for the effect of FBP on the bioavailability of folate from 5MTHF-fortified yogurt agrees with the results from a recently performed in vivo study in which the effect of additional FBP on the bioavailability of 5MTHF from fermented milk was studied (23).
The present study shows that serum folate concentrations in humans can be correctly predicted by means of an in vitro/in silico approach. This combined methodology can be efficiently integrated to develop novel foods with high nutritional quality, to use as a test strategy for identifying the critical steps in bioavailability of nutrients, and to predict the short- and long-term effects of various exposure scenarios (dose, frequency, and duration) in humans. The in vitro/in silico methodology can support an optimal and efficient design for a human trial and avoids the need to perform multiple human intervention studies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Manuscript received 28 August 2006. Initial review completed 11 September 2006. Revision accepted 3 October 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R, Huis in't Veld JHJ. A multicompartimental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. ATLA Altern Lab Anim. 1995;23:197–209.
2. Verwei M, Arkbåge K, Havenaar R, van den Berg H, Witthöft C, Schaafsma G. Folic acid and 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate in fortified milk are bioaccessible as determined in a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model. J Nutr. 2003;133:2377–83.
3. Arkbåge K, Verwei M, Havenaar R, Witthöft C. Addition of folate-binding protein lowers the bioaccessibility of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate from fortified yogurt as studied in a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model. J Nutr. 2003;133:3678–83.
4. Verwei M, van den Berg H, Havenaar R, Groten JP. Effect of folate-binding protein on intestinal transport of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate across Caco-2 cells. Eur J Nutr. 2005;44:242–9.[Medline]
5. Hidalgo IJ, Raub TJ, Borchardt RT. Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology. 1989;96:736–49.[Medline]
6. Hillgren KM, Kato A, Borchardt RT. In vitro systems for studying intestinal drug absorption. Med Res Rev. 1995;15:83–109.[Medline]
7. Gregory, III JF, Williamson J, Liao J-F, Bailey LB, Toth JP. Kinetic model of folate metabolism in nonpregnant women consuming [2H2]folic acid: isotopic labeling of urinary folate and the catabolite para-acetamidobenzoylglutamate indicates slow, intake-dependent, turnover of folate pools. J Nutr. 1998;128:1896–906.
8. Lucock MD, Wild J, Smithells RW, Harley R. In vivo characterization of the absorption and biotransformation of pteroylmonoglutamic acid in man: a model for future studies. Biochem Med Metab Biol. 1989;42:30–42.[Medline]
9. Lin Y, Dueker SR, Follet JR, Fadel JG, Arjomand A, Schneider PD, Miller JW, Green R, Buchholz BA, et al. Quantitation of in vivo human folate metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:680–91.
10. De Jong RJ, Verwei M, West CE, Van Vliet T, Siebelink E, Van den Berg H, Castenmiller JJM. Bioavailability of folic acid from fortified pasteurised and UHT-treated milk in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:906–13.[Medline]
11. Verwei M, Arkbåge K, Mocking H, Havenaar R, Groten J. The FBP binding characteristics during gastric passage are different for folic acid and 5-CH3H4folate as studied in a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model. J Nutr. 2004;134:31–7.
12. DeSesso JM, Jacobson CF. Anatomical and physiological parameters affecting gastrointestinal absorption in humans and rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001;39:209–28.[Medline]
13. De Bree A, Verschuren WMM, Blom HJ, Kromhout D. Association between B vitamin intake and plasma homocysteine concentration in the general Dutch population aged 20–65 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:1027–33.
14. Tamura T, Stokstad EL. The availability of food folate in man. Br J Nutr. 1973;25:513–32.
15. McNulty H, Pentieva K. Folate bioavailability. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63:529–36.[Medline]
16. Wright AJA, Finglas PM, Dainty JR, Wolfe CA, Hart DJ, Wright DM, Gregory JF. Differential kinetic behavior and distribution for pteroylglutamic acid and reduced folates: a revised hypothesis of the primary site of PteGlu metabolism in humans. J Nutr. 2005;135:619–23.
17. Hannon-Fletcher MP, Armstrong NC, Scott JM, Pentieva K, Bradbudy I, Ward M, Strain JJ, Dunn AA, Molloy AM, et al. Determining bioavailability of food folates in a controlled intervention study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:911–8.
18. Melse-Boonstra A, West CE, Katan MB, Kok FJ, Verhoef P. Bioavailability of heptaglutamyl relative to monoglutamyl folic acid in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:424–9.
19. Forssen KM, Jagerstad MI, Wigertz K, Witthoft CM. Folates and dairy products: a critical update. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19: 2 suppl:100S–10S.
20. Jones ML, Nixon PF. Tetrahydrofolates are greatly stabilized by binding to bovine milk folate-binding proteins. J Nutr. 2002;132:2690–4.
21. Lamers Y, Prinz-Langenohl R, Moser R, Pietzrik K. Supplementation with [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate or folic acid equally reduces plasma total homocysteine concentrations in healthy women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:473–8.
22. Reed MC, Nijhout HF, Neuhouser ML, Gregory, III JF, Shane B, James SJ, Boynton A, Ulrich CM. A mathematical model gives insight into nutritional and genetic aspects of folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism. J Nutr. 2006;136:2653–61.
23. Witthoft CM, Arkbage K, Johansson M, Lundin E, Berglund G, Zhang JX, Lennemas H, Dainty JR. Folate absorption from folate-fortified and processed foods using a human ileostomy model. Br J Nutr. 2006;95:181–7.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||