![]() |
|
|
-Linolenic Acid Differ between Normal and Lipoprotein Lipase-Deficient Cats1,2
3 Department of Animal Science and 4 Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 and 5 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: backusr{at}missouri.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Domestic cats that are deficient of LPL activity as a result of a spontaneous mutation of the LPL gene (9) are reported to have a subnormal body fat mass (10). The lean state in LPL-deficient cats initially was attributed to a limitation of fat metabolism possibly unique to cats, a species considered a model for carnivores (11). Findings based on tissue culture led researchers to propose that de novo FA synthesis in cats is low relative to other species (7,12). Recently, it was demonstrated that LPL-deficient cats can be manipulated to gain body fat to the extent of being classified as obese (>30% of body weight as fat). Kanchuk et al. (13) reported that orchiectomy of LPL-deficient cats induces a 29% increase in body weight. The source of FA for adipose TAG in these cats is unknown. Increased de novo FA synthesis supports body fat development in LPL-deficient humans, but this mechanism appears inconsistent with previous findings in cats (12). Fatty acids released from circulating lipoproteins in the absence of LPL are sufficient for adipose TAG deposition in cats (13). Release of FA may be mediated by less active or remotely located lipases, such as either endothelial (14) or hepatic lipase (15).
Understanding the mechanisms controlling body fat mass in LPL-deficient cats may provide a novel perspective on control of FA deposition in adipose. In the present study, adipose FA composition in normal and LPL-deficient cats was compared among cats receiving the same diet. A marker FA [
-linolenic acid; 18:3(n-3)] was added to the diet to trace the relative rate of FA turnover in LPL-deficient and normal queens. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of dietary FA to the body fat of LPL-deficient cats.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diet.
With the exception of brief periods when the cats were previously included in feeding trials, all weaned cats were fed a commercial, dry-type (extruded) diet that had passed growth and maintenance feeding-protocol testing (16). All diets used came from the same batch received from the manufacturer and were stored during the study within a temperature range of 16–27°C. After initial measurements,
-linolenic acid [18:3(n-3)] concentration was enriched in the diet by addition of 30 g of linseed oil [565 g of 18:3(n-3)/kg oil, Montana Specialty Mills] to each kg of the diet. The oil was mixed with d-
-tocopherol (1 mg/g oil) (Sigma-Aldrich) prior to the study and thereafter stored in aliquots at 7°C until added to portions of the diet as needed for 2 to 3-wk periods. The oil was dispersed in the diet by spraying and then combining for 5–10 min using a mixer (Hobart). The addition of oil increased diet energy density to an estimated 16.4 kJ/g with dietary fat accounting for a calculated 23% of metabolizable energy.
Ingredient and FA compositions of the diet are shown in Table 1. Proximate and FA analyses were conducted in triplicate on samples of the diet collected before and after the addition of oil, using established methods (17–20).
|
250 mg) was collected during intravenous anesthesia (10 mg/kg ketamine HCl + 0.5 mg/kg diazepam) from the inguinal fat pad after withholding the diet for 16 h. Plasma and adipose samples were sealed in a screw top vial purged with nitrogen gas, and stored at –80°C until later analyses. After oil was added to the diet, adipose biopsies were repeated in all cats on d 110. On d 38 and 61, samples were collected from 4 cats randomly selected from each group, whereas on d 251, samples were collected from all queens retained for the study beyond d 130 (8 LPL-deficient and 3 normal queens). Blood sampling was also repeated at the times of the biopsies and on d 117 when blood was collected before and after withholding the diet for 16 h.
On d 109–111 and 251–252, body fat and lean mass of the cats were determined by modification (21) of the isotopic water dilution method (22).
Biochemical analyses. Total lipid fractions were extracted from thawed samples of adipose and plasma using chloroform:methanol (2:1, v:v) containing 0.2% glacial acetic acid after the addition of internal standards (1,2-diundecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, Avanti Polar Lipids; trinonadecanoin and nonadecanoic acid, Nu Chek Prep)(23). Due to the high proportion of TAG in the adipose lipid extract, Sep-Pak Vac silica gel cartridges (500 mg, Waters) were used to separate neutral lipids from the more polar phospholipids (PL) (24). Extracted lipids were separated into TAG, nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA), and PL fractions using 200 µm layer thickness TLC plates (10 x 10 cm, HPK Silica Gel 60 Å, Whatman International), with a solvent system of hexane:diethyl ether:formic acid (80:20:2, v:v:v), and detection with fluorescent stain (2',7'-dichlorofluorescein solution under UV light) (25). Identified TAG, NEFA, and PL bands were scraped into individual glass tubes, sealed under nitrogen using a Teflon-coated cap, and stored at –80°C until FA analysis. TAG, NEFA, and PL fractions were isolated from plasma samples on d 117.
The FA composition of each isolated lipid fraction was determined using GC as described by DePeters et al. (26) with the following changes: methyl esters were formed by the addition of 100 µL of 1 mol/L sodium methylate in methanol. Due to the high concentration of TAG in adipose and plasma from LPL-deficient cats, all reagents were doubled in volume, and 300 µL of 1 mol/L sodium methylate in methanol was used to elicit a reaction for the TAG fractions. The column temperature program was 70°C for 10 min, 175°C for 29 min at 20°C/min, then 225°C for 10 min at 5°C/min. For analysis of FA from adipose, a split ratio of 1:125 was used, whereas for all other analyses, a ratio of 1:20 was used. Fatty acid analysis of the diet was conducted using the method described by Sukhija and Palmquist (27), except that hexane was substituted for benzene in the method.
Commercial kits were used to determine TAG and NEFA concentrations in plasma samples (TR22421, Thermo Electron Clinical Chemistry, and NEFA-C, Wako Pure Chemical Industries). Plasma from LPL-deficient cats had to be diluted in normal saline for TAG determinations.
Statistical Analysis.
Repeated-measure, general linear models ANOVA with least-squares post-hoc comparisons was used to determine significance of differences between LPL-deficient and normal queens in serially measured body weight and FA proportions in adipose TAG and PL. Paired t test was used to compare within-group differences between variables determined at 2 different times. Student's t test was used to compare variables between LPL-deficient and normal queens. Statistical analyses were conducted with commercial software (SAS, version 8.01, SAS Institute). Differences were considered significant when P
0.05. Variances reported with mean values are SEM, except for diet analyses, which are SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
50% upon withholding diet (Table 3). In contrast, plasma TAG concentrations in normal queens after withholding diet did not differ from concentrations before withholding the diet.
|
Plasma PL FA proportions in LPL-deficient queens differed slightly (P < 0.05) from those in normal queens (Supplemental Table 1). Withholding the diet affected plasma PL FA proportions in LPL-deficient and normal queens similarly; proportional increases occurred in 18:0, 20:4(n-6), and 22:6(n-3), whereas decreases occurred in proportions of most of the other FAs.
Plasma NEFA concentration in normal queens increased (P < 0.05) with diet withholding (Table 3). An opposite response occurred in LPL-deficient queens. Plasma NEFA concentrations decreased (P < 0.05) with diet withholding in LPL-deficient queens. Plasma NEFA concentrations in LPL-deficient queens, when diet was continuously present, did not differ from plasma NEFA concentrations in normal queens when diet was withheld. With the exception of small differences in proportions of 12:0, 20:4(n-6), and 22:6(n-3), the FA proportions in NEFA did not differ between LPL-deficient and normal queens (Supplemental Table 1). Food withholding substantively altered FA proportions in plasma NEFA. Proportions of all PUFA decreased (P < 0.05) in the LPL-deficient and normal queens except for 22:6(n-3), which did not differ. The NEFA monounsaturated FA (MUFA; 16:1 and 18:1) proportions also decreased (P < 0.05) in LPL-deficient queens, but were unchanged in normal queens. All NEFA saturated FA (SFA; 12:0, 14:0, 16:0, and 18:0) proportions increased (P < 0.05) in LPL-deficient queens, whereas only 16:0 increased (P < 0.05) in normal queens.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12%) and the near normal percentage of body fat (25 ± 2%) found in the cats after addition of linseed oil (d 110). Prior to adding the oil, LPL-deficient queens were assumed to be as lean as previously observed (
6% body fat) (10). The source of FA for the increased body fat was not evident. It also was not evident why body weight gain ceased while oil supplementation continued. Khokher and Dandona (29) observed that linolenic acid stimulates and potentiates insulin action on synthesis of FA and TAG in isolated rat adipocytes. Increased sensitivity of adipose to insulin might have led to normalization of body fat in the LPL-deficient queens. However, if this were the case, the lean state of LPL-deficient cats would stem from a reversible insulin resistance in adipose. Future evaluation of tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in LPL-deficient cats might be valuable toward understanding the mechanism that regulates body fat mass. Before and after the addition of linseed oil to the diet, clear differences in adipose FA composition occurred between LPL-deficient and normal queens. Most notably, the proportion of 16:0 was higher, and 18:2(n-6) was lower, in adipose TAG of LPL-deficient cats than in normal queens (Fig. 2). A similar pattern was found in LPL-deficient humans and mice (5,6). The deviation in FA composition of LPL-deficiency compared with normal LPL might indicate poor entry of dietary FA into adipose tissue and a compensatory increase in FA synthesis to maintain adipose TAG stores. This explanation was deduced from observations that the principal product of de novo FA synthesis is 16:0 (30) and that 18:2(n-6) must be acquired from diet (31). Hence, it would appear that FA synthesis is substantial in cats lacking LPL, despite previous reports of low rates of FA synthesis in slices of adipose and liver tissue from cats (12). As in humans with functional LPL (30), normal cats may readily synthesize FA when dietary fat is low enough. To the authors' knowledge, the effect of dietary fat concentration on FA synthesis has not been previously evaluated in cats.
Proportions of 10:0, 12:0, 14:0, and 16:1 in adipose TAG were also increased in LPL-deficient queens. For 16:1, but not the other FA, a similar high proportion is found in LPL-deficient humans and mice. Elevation in 16:1 probably indicates increased desaturation of 16:0, which is enriched in LPL-deficient animals. Greater proportions of 10:0, 12:0, and 14:0 in LPL-deficient than in normal queens might indicate that cats, relative to humans and mice, are less proficient in elongating FA to 16:0. Alternatively, because 16:0 is highly enriched in adipose of LPL-deficient queens, the relatively high enrichments of 10:0, 12:0, and 14:0 may only reflect partial ß-oxidation of 16:0 in the queens.
Despite a lack of LPL catalytic activity in LPL-deficient cats (9), substantive amounts of dietary (n-6) and (n-3) FA were found in adipose of LPL-deficient queens (Figs. 2 and 3). Clearly, one or more alternative mechanisms must deliver FA to adipose in the absence of LPL. Fatty acids may be acquired by receptor-mediated endocytosis of lipoproteins, but this process appears limited in adipose (32,33). Activity of intravascular lipases structurally similar to LPL might be responsible. Hepatic lipase hydrolyzes TAG and PL in plasma lipoproteins (15) and occurs in extrahepatic vascular sites where the lipase may free FA for uptake and storage (8). Endothelial lipase may also release FA from plasma lipoproteins, although its activity is directed toward only PL. Endothelial lipase may be especially relevant in LPL-deficiency because its expression is upregulated when adipose lacks LPL (14).
High plasma NEFA concentration was found in LPL-deficient queens while the diet was continuously present (Table 3). A similar NEFA concentration was observed in normal queens when diet was withheld. The NEFA elevation might reflect activity of lipases other than LPL on plasma lipoproteins in extraordinary abundance. The very high plasma TAG concentration in LPL-deficient queens is consistent with the characteristic intravascular accumulation of chylomicrons and VLDL that is observed in LPL-deficiency (34). While the diet was present, the proportions of (n-6) and (n-3) NEFA in plasma were slightly greater (P < 0.05) than (n-6) and (n-3) FA proportions in adipose TAG (Table 3). This indicates that the acquisition of NEFA released from plasma lipoproteins is a plausible way for dietary FA to enter adipose in LPL-deficient cats. Utilization of plasma NEFA by adipose lacking LPL would probably be greatest in the absorptive state, when the hormonal signaling and abundance of substrate favors anabolism.
Although body fat mass expanded in LPL-deficient queens with linseed oil added to the diet, the rate of 18:3(n-3) incorporated into adipose TAG lagged well behind that in normal queens (Fig. 3). This response, in conjunction with the observed 16:0 to 18:2(n-6) proportions in LPL-deficient queens, indicates a much slower incorporation of dietary FA in adipose of LPL-deficient relative to normal cats. Hence, LPL appears to be important but not essential for dietary FA to enter into the adipose of cats. Also, LPL does not appear to be necessary for sustaining a normal adipose mass in cats. Similar findings in LPL-deficient humans prompted Fielding and Frayn (35) to suggest that control of FA deposition in adipose is regulated distally to LPL, probably involving regulation of hormone-sensitive lipase and FA esterification into TAG. Presumably, even without LPL, body adipose mass enlarges until feedback inhibition prevents further expansion.
Even after d 250, 18:3(n-3) concentration in adipose TAG of normal queens continued to increase. Similar long equilibration periods (>5 mo) for dietary FA incorporation into adipose are suggested to occur in cats (36) and are observed in other species (37,38). However, relative to 18:3(n-3), other dietary FA might equilibrate more rapidly in adipose TAG. Summers et al. (39) report that the net rate of adipose FA uptake in humans varies with FA species, ranking in an order of (n-3) FA < SFA < (n-6) FA < MUFA.
In adipose PL, FA compositional changes with the addition of linseed oil were different and more rapid than those in adipose TAG. 18:3(n-3) and other FA proportional changes in adipose PL of LPL-deficient were similar but not identical to those in normal queens (Fig. 3). The ratio of SFA to PUFA in PL in LPL-deficient queens was slightly greater (P < 0.05) than that of normal queens (Fig. 4). The 18:3(n-3) observations indicated FA composition of membrane PL depends little on LPL activity and was influenced only slightly by the abundance of de novo synthesized FA in adipose.
In conclusion, analysis of FA composition of subcutaneous adipose TAG of LPL-deficient cats indicates that substantial de novo FA synthesis occurs in domestic cats, and that synthesized FA contributes greatly to body fat stores of LPL-deficient cats. Use of 18:3(n-3) as a dietary FA marker shows that loading of adipose with 18:3(n-3) occurs slowly in cats, and that LPL-deficiency probably impairs adipose acquisition of all dietary FA. The NEFA in plasma during the absorptive state is a plausible source of FA found in adipose of LPL-deficient cats. Supplementing the diet with linseed oil appears to induce body weight gain and normalize body fat in LPL-deficient cats. The cause for this is unknown. Our observations are consistent with previous findings in other species, indicating that LPL is not required for the maintenance of normal adiposity, and that without LPL, FA composition of body fat is substantially altered and results in the storage of saturated over unsaturated FA.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supplemental Table 1 is available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. ![]()
6 Abbreviations used: FA, fatty acids; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; MUFA, monounsaturated FA; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; PL, phospholipid; SFA, saturated fatty acid; TAG, triacylglycerol. ![]()
Manuscript received 25 July 2006. Initial review completed 28 August 2006. Revision accepted 20 September 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Evans K, Burdge GC, Wootton SA, Clark ML, Frayn KN. Regulation of dietary fatty acid entrapment in subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2002;51:2684–90.
2. Eckel RH. Adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase. In: Borensztajn J, editor. Lipoprotein lipase. Chicago: Evener; 1987. p. 79–132.
3. Greenwood MR. The relationship of enzyme activity to feeding behavior in rats: lipoprotein lipase as the metabolic gatekeeper. Int J Obes. 1985;9: Suppl 1:67–70.[Medline]
4. Brun LD, Gagne C, Julien P, Tremblay A, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Lupien PJ. Familial lipoprotein lipase-activity deficiency: study of total body fatness and subcutaneous fat tissue distribution. Metabolism. 1989;38:1005–9.[Medline]
5. Weinstock PH, Levak-Frank S, Hudgins LC, Radner H, Friedman JM, Zechner R, Breslow JL. Lipoprotein lipase controls fatty acid entry into adipose tissue, but fat mass is preserved by endogenous synthesis in mice deficient in adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10261–6.
6. Ullrich NF, Purnell JQ, Brunzell JD. Adipose tissue fatty acid composition in humans with lipoprotein lipase deficiency. J Investig Med. 2001;49:273–5.[Medline]
7. Bergen WG, Mersmann HJ. Comparative aspects of lipid metabolism: impact on contemporary research and use of animal models. J Nutr. 2005;135:2499–502.
8. Peeva E, Brun LD, Ven Murthy MR, Despres JP, Normand T, Gagne C, Lupien PJ, Julien P. Adipose cell size and distribution in familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16:737–44.[Medline]
9. Ginzinger DG, Lewis ME, Ma Y, Jones BR, Liu G, Jones SD. A mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene is the molecular basis of chylomicronemia in a colony of domestic cats. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1257–66.[Medline]
10. Backus RC, Ginzinger DG, Ashbourne Excoffon KJ, Clee SM, Hayden MR, Eckel RH, Hickman MA, Rogers QR. Maternal expression of functional lipoprotein lipase and effects on body fat mass and body condition scores of mature cats with lipoprotein lipase deficiency. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:264–9.[Medline]
11. MacDonald ML, Rogers QR, Morris JG. Nutrition of the domestic cat, a mammalian carnivore. Annu Rev Nutr. 1984;4:521–62.[Medline]
12. Richard MJ, Holck JT, Beitz DC. Lipogenesis in liver and adipose tissue of the domestic cat (Felis domestica). Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1989;93:561–4.[Medline]
13. Kanchuk ML, Backus RC, Calvert CC, Morris JG, Rogers QR. Weight gain in gonadectomized normal and lipoprotein lipase-deficient male domestic cats results from increased food intake and not decreased energy expenditure. J Nutr. 2003;133:1866–74.
14. Kratky D, Zimmermann R, Wagner EM, Strauss JG, Jin W, Kostner GM, Haemmerle G, Rader DJ, Zechner R. Endothelial lipase provides an alternative pathway for FFA uptake in lipoprotein lipase-deficient mouse adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:161–7.[Medline]
15. Demacker PN, Hijmans AG, Stalenhoef AF, van 't Laar A. Studies on the function of hepatic lipase in the cat after immunological blockade of the enzyme in vivo. Atherosclerosis. 1988;69:173–83.[Medline]
16. Association of American Feed Control Officials. Official publication. Oxford (IN): Association of American Feed Control Officials; 2003.
17. Veltri BC. The effects of long term dietary consumption of
-linolenic acid on adipose tissue composition and milk fatty acids in normal and lipoprotein lipase-deficient queens [thesis]. Davis (CA): University of California, Davis; 2005.
18. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Arlington (VA): AOAC; 1995.
19. Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: James WPT, Theander O, editors. The analysis of dietary fiber in food. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1991. p. 123–130.
20. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583–97.[Abstract]
21. Backus RC, Havel PJ, Gingerich RL, Rogers QR. Relationship between serum leptin immunoreactivity and body fat mass as estimated by use of a novel gas-phase Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy deuterium dilution method in cats. Am J Vet Res. 2000;61:796–801.[Medline]
22. Lukaski HC, Johnson PE. A simple, inexpensive method of determining total body water using a tracer dose of D2O and infrared absorption of biological fluids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41:363–70.
23. Bauer JE. Increased serum and liver lipid mass and hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase activities in rabbits fed soy protein saturated fat diets. Artery. 1990;17:176–88.[Medline]
24. Bitman J, Wood DL, Mehta NR, Hamosh P, Hamosh M. Comparison of the phospholipid composition of breast milk from mothers of term and preterm infants during lactation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;40:1103–19.
25. Christie WW. Lipid analysis: isolation, separation, identification and structural analysis of lipids. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1973.
26. DePeters EJ, German JB, Taylor SJ, Essex ST, Perez-Monti H. Fatty acid and triglyceride composition of milk fat from lactating Holstein cows in response to supplemental canola oil. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:929–36.[Abstract]
27. Sukhija PS, Palmquist DL. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. J Agric Food Chem. 1988;36:1202–6.
28. Kane E, Leung PM, Rogers QR, Morris JG. Diurnal feeding and drinking patterns of adult cats as affected by changes in the level of fat in the diet. Appetite. 1987;9:89–98.[Medline]
29. Khokher MA, Dandona P. The effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids on rat adipocyte lipogenesis: the role of protein kinase C, calcium and calmodulin. Diabetes Res. 1988;8:139–41.[Medline]
30. Hudgins LC, Hellerstein M, Seidman C, Neese R, Diakun J, Hirsch J. Human fatty acid synthesis is stimulated by a eucaloric low fat, high carbohydrate diet. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2081–91.[Medline]
31. Rivers JP, Frankel TL. Essential fatty acid deficiency. Br Med Bull. 1981;37:59–64.
32. Kuniyasu A, Hayashi S, Nakayama H. Adipocytes recognize and degrade oxidized low density lipoprotein through CD36. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;295:319–23.[Medline]
33. Zhao SP, Wu J, Zhang DQ, Ye HJ, Liu L, Li JQ. Fenofibrate enhances CD36 mediated endocytic uptake and degradation of oxidized low density lipoprotein in adipocytes from hypercholesterolemia rabbit. Atherosclerosis. 2004;177:255–62.[Medline]
34. Ginzinger DG, Clee SM, Dallongeville J, Lewis ME, Henderson HE, Bauje E, Rogers QR, Jensen DR, Eckel RH, et al. Lipid and lipoprotein analysis of cats with lipoprotein lipase deficiency. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999;29:17–26.[Medline]
35. Fielding BA, Frayn KN. Lipoprotein lipase and the disposition of dietary fatty acids. Br J Nutr. 1998;80:495–502.[Medline]
36. van Niel MH, Beynen AC. The intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids by cats is reflected in their adipose tissue. Vet Q. 1997;19:150–3.[Medline]
37. Dayton S, Hashimoto S, Dixon W, Pearce ML. Composition of lipids in human serum and adipose tissue during prolonged feeding of a diet high in unsaturated fat. J Lipid Res. 1966;7:103–11.[Abstract]
38. Hudgins LC, Hirsch J. Changes in abdominal and gluteal adipose-tissue fatty acid compositions in obese subjects after weight gain and weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:1372–7.
39. Summers LK, Barnes SC, Fielding BA, Beysen C, Ilic V, Humphreys SM, Frayn KN. Uptake of individual fatty acids into adipose tissue in relation to their presence in the diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1470–7.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||