![]() |
|
|
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: deb6{at}cornell.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During MFD, transcription of mammary genes involved in milk fat synthesis are coordinately downregulated (1). Molecular mechanisms mediating this inhibition are not well understood, but a role for the sterol response elementbinding protein (SREBP) family of transcription factors was proposed (3), based on their function as global regulators of expression for many genes involved in lipid synthesis (4). This was supported in studies with a bovine mammary epithelial cell line, where trans-10, cis-12 CLA decreased abundance of the nuclear active SREBP1 protein (5). An additional potential mechanism was disclosed when we identified thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 (S14) as a trans-10, cis-12 CLA responsive candidate gene in microarray analysis of bovine mammary epithelial cell cultures (unpublished data). Although its exact biochemical function is not known, S14 is a gene that encodes a nuclear protein that is closely associated with the regulation of fatty acid synthesis in lipogenic tissues (6).
Our objective was to investigate the expression of SREBP1 and S14 in the mammary tissue of lactating cows under 2 situations where milk fat synthesis is reduced, diet induced-MFD and administration of trans-10, cis-12 CLA. We found downregulation of SREBP1, SREBP1 regulatory proteins, and SREBP-regulated enzymes during milk fat depression. Moreover, our studies revealed a previously unrecognized involvement of S14 in the regulation of mammary synthesis of milk fat and a broader role in CLA-related regulation of lipid synthesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Milk sampling and analysis. Cows were milked 3 times/d and yields were recorded. Samples were taken at each milking on the last day and analyzed for fat and true protein, using a mid-infrared spectrophotometer (7; Dairy One Cooperative). Additional samples for fatty acid analysis were composited based on milk fat yield; lipid was extracted and transmethylated and methyl esters were quantified by GC according to Perfield et al. (9).
Tissue biopsy. Mammary biopsies were taken 13 h after milking on d 14. Cows were given intravenous xylazine (1525 mg) and a 15 mL lidocaine HCL subdermal block was administered above the incision site. A 0.5 cm incision was made in the skin at the midpoint of the rear quarter and the Magnum Biopsy Gun system (Bard Biopsy Systems) was used. Briefly, a 10 gauge cannula with trocar was inserted 5 cm into the mammary gland through the incision. The trocar was removed and a 12-gauge biopsy needle mounted in the biopsy gun was inserted through the cannula and fired. Tissue samples (30 mg tissue/biopsy) were rinsed with 0.9% saline solution, inspected to verify tissue homogeneity, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were stored at 80°C until RNA extraction. Multiple biopsies were routinely collected by reinserting the biopsy needle through the cannula. Immediately upon removal of the biopsy needle, the trocar was replaced and a purse string suture was placed around the cannula with #1 Nylon. The suture was tied as the cannula was removed and pressure applied to reduce collection of blood under the skin. The biopsy procedure resulted in minimal bleeding and milk appeared normal in 24 milkings following the biopsy; no intramammary infections or loss of production were encountered.
RNA isolation and real-time PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from
30 mg mammary tissue from 1 biopsy using the RNeasy Lipid kit (Qiagen) and DNA contamination was removed by on-column DNase treatment (RNase-Free DNase Set; Qiagen). RNA concentration and integrity were determined by a 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Total RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis kit (Invitrogen) with random primers. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were developed for genes of interest (Supplemental Table 1). Briefly, primers were designed on or spanning exon boundaries when possible using PrimerExpress v2.0 (Applied Biosystems), and optimal primer pairs were selected using Primer3 (10) and PerlPrimer (11). qRT-PCR included iTaq SYBR Green Supermix with ROX (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and 400 nmol/L of gene-specific forward and reverse primers (Invitrogen). cDNA (525 ng) was amplified using a 2-step program (95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s) with an ABI PRISM 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Dissociation curves were generated at the end of amplification to verify presence of a single product. Sample message level was determined, relative to a dilution curve of pooled mammary cDNA (12).
Data mining.
Publicly available data from 2 microarray experiments were downloaded [NCBI GEO Dataset GSE1580 and 14]. Specifics of animals and experimental procedures were previously described (13,14). Briefly, House et al. (13) fed 9-wk-old mice (NCSU M16 line) diets containing 1% trans-10, cis-12 CLA or control (1% linoleic acid) for 14 d; total RNA was extracted from the epididymal adipose tissue of 70 mice, pooled into 4 groups per treatment, and analyzed on the Mouse Oligo microarray slide (G4121A; Agilent Technologies). Hargrave et al. (14) fed 12-wk-old mice (UNL MC line) diets containing 0 or 2% of a mixed isomer CLA (
50% trans-10, cis-12) for 16 d; adipose tissue RNA from 5 littermate pairs was analyzed on the Mouse 430A 2.0 GeneChip (Affymetrix).
Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using the fit model procedure of JMP (version 5.0, SAS Institute). The model to test treatment means included the random effect of cow and the fixed effects of period and treatment. Additionally, the geometric mean of 3 housekeeping genes (18S ribosomal subunit, ß-actin, and ß2-microglobulin) was calculated using GeNorm (15) and used as a covariant in the model (16). Data points with Studentized Residuals >2.5 were considered outliers and excluded from analysis. Few points were excluded in analysis and rarely more than 1 per response variable. Preplanned contrasts included the effect of CLA (CON vs. CLA) and the effect of LF/HO diet (CON vs. LF/HO). The relation between expression of individual genes (SREBP1 and S14) and lipogenic enzymes [fatty acid synthase (FASN) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL)] was tested with the above model by replacing treatment with the predictor gene of interest. Relations between expression of genes was declared significant at P < 0.01 and a trend at P < 0.05. For statistical analysis of S14 data from House et al. (13), the P-value and fold change for the S14 annotated probe was downloaded (GSE1580). For the data of Hargrave et al. (14), downloaded fluorescent intensities of the S14 annotated probeset were log (base 2) transformed and treatment means were compared using a t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
were moderately decreased during diet-induced MFD (Fig. 1C). However, expression of PGC1ß was not altered by treatments.
Expression of S14 during milk fat depression.
Expression of S14 was downregulated in mammary tissue during treatment with trans-10, cis-12 CLA, and LF/HO-induced MFD (Fig. 1B). Relatively little is known about S14 in bovine tissues, so we examined its tissue expression profile (Fig. 2). Adipose tissue and liver were the predominant sites of S14 expression. Expression of S14 in lactating mammary tissue was >2-fold greater than observed for nonlactating mammary tissue, and substantially greater (>75-fold) than lung. The tissue profile for midline 1 interacting protein 1 (MID1IP1), a gene with sequence homology to S14, was also examined, and it was expressed at similar levels in all tissues expect skeletal muscle, which had
16-fold greater expression than mammary tissue (Fig. 2).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The SREBP family of transcription factors function as global regulators of lipid metabolism (4). SREBP1c predominately regulates enzymes involved in fat synthesis and is expected to be the predominant transcript expressed in mammary tissue. However, because of the limited amount of available annotated sequence, our qRT-PCR assay does not distinguish between isoforms 1a and 1c; thus, we refer to them collectively as SREBP1. The full length SREBP protein is complexed with SCAP and anchored in the ER through association with a third protein, either INSIG1 or INSIG2 (4,19,20). SREBP is activated by dissociation of INSIG from the SREBP/SCAP complex, allowing translocation of the complex to the Golgi where 2 proteases act to release a nuclear fragment (nSREBP). In turn nSREBP translocates to the nucleus where it binds to sterol-regulatory elements (SRE) in the promoter/enhancer regions of target genes, recruits coactivators, and stimulates transcription (4).
SREBP1 is one of the predominant mechanisms of inhibition of fat synthesis by PUFA (21). We first examined the SREBP-regulatory system in bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T cell line) and observed decreased abundance of nSREBP1 protein during trans-10, cis-12 CLA inhibition of fatty acid synthesis (5). In this investigation, we extend these results to in vivo and demonstrate decreased expression of SREBP1 and INSIG1 during both trans-10, cis-12 CLA treatment and diet-induced MFD. Expression of SREBP1 and INSIG1 correlates with the concentration of the nSREBP1 protein, as both SREBP1c and INSIG1 genes contain an SRE in their proximal promoter (22,23). INSIG1 is normally expressed at higher levels than INSIG2, has a faster turnover, and is more dynamic (20). SCAP and INSIG typically function in stoiciometric concentrations (20), and we observed SCAP and INSIG2 expressions were decreased during diet-induced MFD, but not by CLA treatment. This treatment difference may relate to the greater decrease in milk fat or the longer duration of MFD for the LF/HO diet.
The PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators are environmentally responsive factors regulating tissue metabolism (24). Specifically, PGC-1ß is increased in response to high fat intake and coactivates SREBP1 (25). In lactating rat mammary tissue, corn oil decreased expression of FASN, SREBP1c, and PGC-1ß, but increased expression of PGC-1
. In this study, expression of PGC-1ß was unaffected by treatment and PGC-1
was only slightly decreased by the LF/HO treatment. Thus, our results offer little or no support for altered transcription of the PGC family of coactivators in the regulation of milk fat synthesis.
The synthesis and secretion of milk fat by the mammary gland involves an integration of different biochemical processes, and characterization of lipogenic genes during MFD highlights the coordinated downregulation in the expression of key enzymes associated with these processes (Table 3). SREBP1 is highly expressed in the lactating bovine mammary gland (unpublished data) and, as illustrated in Table 3, many of these key enzymes are transcriptionally regulated by SREBP1 (28,29). In mice, SREBP1 is upregulated at the initiation of lactation (30), and disruption of the SREBP1c gene results in a 41% decrease in milk fat concentration (31). Interestingly, a maximum 50% reduction in milk fat synthesis is observed during diet-induced MFD (1) and during dose-response studies with exogenous trans-10, cis-12 CLA (8).
|
The exact biochemical function of S14 has not been established. Originally identified as a protein acutely responsive to thyroid hormone [see review by Cunningham et al. (6)], S14 is primarily a nuclear protein that forms homo- and heterodimers (6) and interacts with transcription factors (36). The S14 promoter also contains a SRE (37) and its expression is highly responsive to nSREBP1 (33). Perhaps the strongest evidence of S14 function comes from studies of rat heptocytes, where transfection with S14 antisense oligonucleotide prevented expression of lipogenic enzymes (32,38). In addition, mice with a partial S14 knockout have decreased milk fat concentration, due to decreased de novo fatty acid synthesis, although surprisingly, activities of mammary lipogenic enzymes were unaltered (35).
We found mammary expression of S14 was downregulated during diet-induced MFD and trans-10, cis-12 CLA treatment. This is the first study, to our knowledge, of the regulation of mammary expression and, to our knowledge, the first to examine the regulatory role of CLA. However, hepatic expression of S14 has been extensively investigated and was shown to be responsive to a range of metabolic hormones and dietary nutrients, including PUFA [see review by Cummingham et al. (6)]. Trans-10, cis-12 CLA reduces body fat accretion in several species (17), although the CLA dose in studies of its antiobesity affect is substantially greater than that required to reduce milk fat synthesis (0.52.0% of diet in rodents vs. 0.045% of diet in this study). Using microarray data from studies with mice (13,14), we found that CLA treatment resulted in a significant reduction in expression of S14 in adipose tissue. Thus, S14 may be more broadly implicated in the mechanism by which CLA is able to affect lipid metabolism.
Multivariate analysis in this study revealed a significant relation in bovine mammary tissue between expression of S14 and expression of FASN and LPL (R2 = 0.86 and 0.42, respectively; Supplemental Table 3). Altered expression of S14 has also been associated with other unique phenotypes involving regulation of fat synthesis. For example, abnormalities in the regulation of adipose S14 expression have been reported in obese subjects (39). Likewise, gene expression profiling identified differential expression of S14 in livers of chickens selected for growth (40), hepatic tissue of chickens selected for adiposity (41), and muscles of cattle that differ in marbling (42). Lastly, S14 is also a component of the lipogenic phenotype observed in aggressive breast cancers (34) and knockdown or overexpression of S14 results in corresponding effects on breast cancer cell growth (33). The anticarcinogenic affect of trans-10, cis-12 CLA has been well characterized for in vitro and in vivo models [see review by Ip et al. (43)]; based on our results, the possible role of S14 in the mechanism merits examination.
In conclusion, decreased expression of SREBP1 and proteins associated with SREBP1 activation during MFD, combined with the presence of SREBP response elements in lipogenic genes downregulated during MFD, provide strong evidence for SREBP1 as a central signaling pathway regulating fatty acid synthesis in bovine mammary glands. Furthermore, downregulation of S14 during diet-induced MFD and trans-10, cis-12 CLA treatment is consistent with a role for S14 in mammary fatty acid synthesis, possibly as a SREBP1 secondary cellular signal or a lipogenic factor.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supplemental Tables 13 are available with the online posting of this paper at jn.nutrition.org. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used: CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; CON, control treatment; DM, dry matter; FA, fatty acids; FASN, fatty acid synthase; INSIG, insulin induced gene; LF/HO, low forage and high oil; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; MID1IP1, midline 1 interacting protein; MFD, milk fat depression; PGC, peroxisome proliferative activated receptor, gamma, coactivator; nSREBP, nuclear fragment of SREBP; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR; S14, thyroid hormone responsive spot 14; SCAP, SREBP cleavage-activating protein; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; SRE, SREBP response element; SREBP, sterol response elementbinding protein. ![]()
Manuscript received 6 June 2006. Initial review completed 16 June 2006. Revision accepted 16 July 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Bauman DE, Griinari JM. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2003;23:20327.[Medline]
2. Baumgard LH, Corl BA, Dwyer DA, Sæbø A, Bauman DE. Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:R17984.
3. Baumgard LH, Matitashvili E, Corl BA, Dwyer DA, Bauman DE. Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid decreases lipogenic rates and expression of genes involved in milk lipid synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:215563.
4. Eberle D, Hegarty B, Bossard P. Ferre, Foufelle F. SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis. Biochimie. 2004;86:83948.[Medline]
5. Peterson DG, Matitashvili EA, Bauman DE. The inhibitory effect of trans-10, cis-12 CLA on lipid synthesis in bovine mammary epithelial cells involves reduced proteolytic activation of the transcription factor SREBP-1. J Nutr. 2004;134:252327.
6. Cunningham BA, Moncur JT, Huntington JT, Kinlaw WB. "Spot 14" protein: a metabolic integrator in normal and neoplastic cells. Thyroid. 1998;8:81525.[Medline]
7. AOCS. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. AOCS, Arlington, VA. 2000.
8. de Veth MJ, Griinari JM, Pfeiffer AM, Bauman DE. Effect of CLA on milk fat synthesis in dairy cows: comparison of inhibition by methyl esters and free fatty acids, and relationships among studies. Lipids. 2004;39:36572.[Medline]
9. Perfield, II JW, Delmonte P, Lock AL, Yurawecz MP, Bauman DE. Trans-10, trans-12 conjugated linoleic acid does not affect milk fat yield but reduces delta-9 desaturase index in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:255966.
10. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000. p. 36586.
11. Marshall OJ. PerlPrimer: cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:247172.
12. Applied Biosystems. Relative quantification of gene expression. ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System User Bulletin 2. 2001;pp. 136. Applied Biosystems.
13. House RL, Cassady JP, Eisen EJ, Eling TE, Collins JB, Grissom SF, Odle J. Functional genomic characterization of delipidation elicited by trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12-CLA) in a polygenic obese line of mice. Physiol Genomics. 2005;21:35161.
14. Hargrave KM, Pomp D, Miner JL. Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on adiposity and the adipose-transcriptome [accessed 03/05/2006]. Available from http://animalscience.unl.edu/cla/cladata.htm
15. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:research0034.1.11.
16. Martinez MM, Hill GM, Link JE, Raney NE, Tempelman RJ, Ernst CW. Pharmacological zinc and phytase supplementation enhance metallothionein mRNA abundance and protein concentration in newly weaned pigs. J Nutr. 2004;134:53844.
17. Wang YW, Jones PJ. Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: efficacy and mechanisms. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:94155.[Medline]
18. Peterson DG, Matitashvili EA, Bauman DE. Diet-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows results in increased trans-10, cis-12 CLA in milk fat and coordinated suppression of mRNA abundance for mammary enzymes involved in milk fat synthesis. J Nutr. 2003;133:3098102.
19. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:112531.[Medline]
20. Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA, Brown MS. Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell. 2006;124:3546.[Medline]
21. Jump DB, Botolin D, Wang Y, Xu J, Christian B, Demeure O. Fatty acid regulation of hepatic gene transcription. J Nutr. 2005;135:25036.
22. Amemiya-Kudo M, Shimano H, Yoshikawa T, Yahagi N, Hasty AH, Okazaki H, Tamura Y, Shionoiri F, Iizuka Y, et al. Promoter analysis of the mouse sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c gene. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:3107885.
23. Kast-Woelbern HR, Dana SL, Cesario RM, Sun L, de Grandpre LY, Brooks ME, Osburn DL, Reifel-Miller A, Klausing K, Leibowitz MD. Rosiglitazone induction of Insig-1 in white adipose tissue reveals a novel interplay of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and sterol regulatory element-binding protein in the regulation of adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2390815.
24. Lin J, Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab. 2005;1:36170.[Medline]
25. Lin J, Yang R, Tarr PT, Wu PH, Handschin C, Li S, Yang W, Pei L, Uldry M, et al. Hyperlipidemic effects of dietary saturated fats mediated through PGC-1beta coactivation of SREBP. Cell. 2005;120:26173.[Medline]
26. Piperova LS, Teter BB, Bruckental I, Sampugna J, Mills SE, Yurawecz MP, Fritsche J, Ku K, Erdman RA. Mammary lipogenic enzyme activity, trans fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids are altered in lactating dairy cows fed a milk fat-depressing diet. J Nutr. 2000;130:256874.
27. Ahnadi CE, Beswick N, Delbecchi L, Kennelly JJ, Lacasse P. Addition of fish oil to diets for dairy cows. II. Effects on milk fat and gene expression of mammary lipogenic enzymes. J Dairy Res. 2002;69:52131.[Medline]
28. Liang G, Yang J, Horton JD, Hammer RE, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Diminished hepatic response to fasting/refeeding and liver X receptor agonists in mice with selective deficiency of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:95208.
29. Horton JD, Shah NA, Warrington JA, Anderson NN, Park SW, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1202732.
30. Rudolph MC, McManaman JL, Phang T, Russell T, Kominsky DJ, Serkova NJ, Anderson SM, Neville MC. Metabolic regulation in the lactating mammary gland: A lipid synthesizing machine. Physiol Genomics. 2006; in press.
31. Rudolph M, Marians R, Burns V, Russell T, Neville MC. SREBP1-c plays a regulatory but not essential role in mammary lipogenesis during lactation. The Endocrine Society's 87th Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2005;604.
32. Kinlaw WB, Church JL, Harmon J, Mariash CN. Direct evidence for a role of the "Spot 14" protein in the regulation of lipid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:1661518.
33. Martel PM, Bingham CM, McGraw CJ, Baker CL, Morganelli PM, Meng ML, Armstrong JM, Moncur JT, Kinlaw WB. S14 protein in breast cancer cells: direct evidence of regulation by SREBP-1c, superinduction with progestin, and effects on cell growth. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:27888.[Medline]
34. Wells WA, Schwartz GN, Morganelli PM, Cole BF, Gibson JJ, Kinlaw WB. Expression of "Spot 14" (THRSP) predicts disease free survival in invasive breast cancer: immunohistochemical analysis of a new molecular marker. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;98:23140.[Medline]
35. Zhu Q, Anderson GW, Mucha GT, Parks EJ, Metkowski JK, Mariash CN. The Spot 14 protein is required for de novo lipid synthesis in the lactating mammary gland. Endocrinology. 2005;146:334350.
36. Compe E, de Sousa G, Francois K, Roche R, Rahmani R, Torresani J, Raymondjean M, Planells R. Spot 14 protein interacts and co-operates with chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor 1 in the transcription of the L-type pyruvate kinase gene through a specificity protein 1 (Sp1) binding site. Biochem J. 2001;358:17583.[Medline]
37. Jump DB, Thelen AP, Mater MK. Functional interaction between sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c, nuclear factor Y, and 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine nuclear receptors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3441927.
38. Brown SB, Maloney M, Kinlaw WB. "Spot 14" protein functions at the pretranslational level in the regulation of hepatic metabolism by thyroid hormone and glucose. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:21636.
39. Kirschner LS, Mariash CN. Adipose S14 mRNA is abnormally regulated in obese subjects. Thyroid. 1999;9:1438.[Medline]
40. Cogburn LA, Wang X, Carre W, Rejto L, Porter TE, Aggrey SE, Simon J. Systems-wide chicken DNA microarrays, gene expression profiling, and discovery of functional genes. Poult Sci. 2003;82:93951.
41. Carre W, Diot C, Fillon V, Crooijmans RP, Lagarrigue S, Morrisson M, Vignal A, Groenen MA, Douaire M. Development of 112 unique expressed sequence tags from chicken liver using an arbitrarily primed reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and single strand conformation gel purification method. Anim Genet. 2001;32:28997.[Medline]
42. Wang YH, Byrne KA, Reverter A, Harper GS, Taniguchi M, McWilliam SM, Mannen H, Oyama K, Lehnert SA. Transcriptional profiling of skeletal muscle tissue from two breeds of cattle. Mamm Genome. 2005;16:20110.[Medline]
43. Ip MM, Masso-Welch PA, Ip C. Prevention of mammary cancer with conjugated linoleic acid: role of the stroma and the epithelium. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2003;8:10318.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Shingfield, A. Arola, S. Ahvenjarvi, A. Vanhatalo, V. Toivonen, J. M. Griinari, and P. Huhtanen Ruminal Infusions of Cobalt-EDTA Reduce Mammary {Delta}9-Desaturase Index and Alter Milk Fatty Acid Composition in Lactating Cows J. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 138(4): 710 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Bauman, J. W. Perfield II, K. J. Harvatine, and L. H. Baumgard Regulation of Fat Synthesis by Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Lactation and the Ruminant Model J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, J. P. Schoonmaker, B. J. Bradford, and D. C. Beitz Response of Milk Fatty Acid Composition to Dietary Supplementation of Soy Oil, Conjugated Linoleic Acid, or Both J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 260 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||