![]() |
|
|
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Mammalian Genetics, and Center for Nutritional Sciences, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 326100245
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mkilberg{at}ufl.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transcriptional activation in eukaryotes initiates when transcriptional activators are recruited and a preinitiation complex is formed on the promoter (1113). Proper transcription initiation is one of the essential steps for efficient mRNA synthesis. Two previous studies on the human ASNS gene by independent laboratories have published conflicting results on the transcription start site of human ASNS. Zhang et al. (14) reported a single transcription start site and mapped it to a position 203 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the translation start site. In contrast, Greco et al. (15) simultaneously reported a genomic structure analysis of the human ASNS gene, but they observed multiple transcription start sites, spanning a 62-nt region, within the putative first exon as reported by Zhang et al. Greco et al. observed that the 5'-most transcription start site was 24 nt downstream from the one that Zhang et al. proposed. However, Greco et al. (15) also determined that the 3'-most transcription start site, 117 nt upstream of the translation start site, was the major transcription start site. Subsequent publications, including those from our laboratory (6,7), have designated this major transcription start site as +1. The +1 designation places many of the multiple transcription start sites reported by Greco et al. (15) in the proximal promoter region containing NSRE-1 (nt 68 to 60) and NSRE-2 (nt 48 to 43). The cells in the studies reported by both Zhang et al. (14) and Greco et al. (15) had been incubated in amino acid-complete culture medium. It is not clear what mechanisms are involved in the multiple transcription start site selection in cells influenced by this fed condition. In vivo footprinting data showed that NSRE-1 and NSRE-2 enhancers are already occupied by proteins, even under the amino acidcomplete condition, but that amino acid deprivation induces further protein-DNA interaction (7). Therefore, under the amino aciddeprived condition, the proposed upstream transcription start sites proposed by Greco et al. (15) overlap with the NSRE-1 and NSRE-2 protein-binding sites.
The present studies were designed to extend the previous conflicting reports by determining the main transcription start site for the human ASNS gene after incubation of cells in either an amino acidcomplete medium or a medium lacking an essential amino acid to activate transcription from the gene. Consistent with our previously published data (10), increased transcriptional activity and a net accumulation of ASNS mRNA occurred following histidine limitation. The transcription initiation site was analyzed by 2 independent methods, rapid-amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and ribonuclease protection assay (RPA). Numerous transcription start sites, spread over a 70-nt region of the proximal promoter (nt 69 to +1), were evident when cells were cultured in amino acidcomplete medium. Unexpectedly, amino acid deprivation caused a shift in the alignment of the transcriptional machinery such that a specific transcription start site (+1) was heavily favored.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell treatment and RNA isolation. HepG2 cells were seeded on 60-mm dishes (2.5 x 106 cells) for 24 h in amino acidcomplete MEM, then the cells were transferred for 12 h to a fresh complete MEM or a histidine-free MEM (MEM His), each supplemented with 5% dialyzed FBS. Total cellular RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer's procedure (QIAGEN).
Identification of transcription start sites by RACE. The FirstChoice RLM-RACE Kit (Ambion) was used to analyze transcription start sites for the ASNS gene. The kit uses RNA ligase-mediated RACE to selectively amplify 5'-capped RNA. Following a random-primed reverse transcription reaction, ASNS-specific transcripts were produced by nested PCR using the manufacturer's primers corresponding to the 5' adapter sequence and ASNS gene-specific primers (ASNS-5' outer and ASNS-5' inner). The gene-specific primers were: ASNS-5' outer, 5'-CCATTGTAACAGAGCCAC-3', corresponding to nt +346 to +326 of the ASNS mRNA and ASNS-5' inner, 5'-CATGGTGCAATGAAGCTATAA-3', corresponding to nt +120 to +100 of the ASNS mRNA. For the nucleotide numbering throughout this article, the major transcription start site identified by Greco et al. (15) was designated +1. Samples from at least 2 independent 5' RACE reactions were used for PCR. The amplified products from the nested PCR were then cloned using the TOPO TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen), and from each 5' RACE PCR reaction, 5060 clones were sequenced by the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research Sequencing Core Facility at the University of Florida.
Mapping the transcription start sites by ribonuclease protection assay (RPA). For a probe to be used in a RPA, an ASNS antisense riboprobe (nt 173 to +51) was synthesized with the MAXIscript-T7 kit (Ambion) and RPA was carried out using the RPA III kit (Ambion). Ten µg total RNA was hybridized overnight at 42°C with 2.5 x 104 cpm of a 32P-labeled probe, according to manufacturer's instructions, and then the sample was digested with 2.5 U RNase A and 100 U RNase T1 in 150 µL of RNase buffer by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. Ten µg yeast total RNA was used as a control for the ribonuclease digestion. Precipitated RNA was resolved on a 9% acrylamide · 8 mol · L1 urea denaturing gel at 350 V for 34 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was exposed to Kodak X-ray film and quantification was performed using Un-Scan-It software (Silk Scientific).
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR. To measure the relative amount of ASNS mRNA, quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed using a DNA Engine Opticon 2 system (MJ Research) and detection with SYBR Green I. The ASNS primers for amplification were: sense primer, 5'-GCAGCTGAAAGAAGCCCAAGT- 3' and antisense primer, 5'-TGTCTTCCATGCCAATTGCA- 3'. The reactions were incubated at 50°C for 30 min followed by 95°C for 15 min to activate the Taq polymerase and amplification for 35 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, and at 60°C for 60 s. After PCR, melting curves were acquired by a stepwise increase of the temperature from 55°C to 95°C to ensure that a single product was amplified in the reaction. As the internal control, the ß-actin mRNA level was measured at the same time. The primers for ß-actin amplification were: sense primer, 5'-GCTCCTCCTGAGCGCAAGTATC - 3' and antisense primer, 5'-GTGGACAGCGAGGCCAGGAT - 3'. PCR was performed in duplicate for each sample and samples were analyzed from at least 3 independent experiments. Means ± the SEM between conditions were compared by Student's t test.
Transcriptional activity determination. Total RNA was treated with DNase I treatment using the procedures described in the Qiagen RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) to eliminate DNA contamination. To measure the transcription activity from the ASNS gene, primer sequences across the ASNS intron 12 and exon 13 boundary were used to measure the short-lived heterogeneous nuclear RNA (hnRNA). The primers for amplification were: sense primer, 5'-CCTGCCATTTTAAGCCATTTTGC- 3' and anti-sense primer, 5'-TGGGCTGCATTTGCCATCATT- 3'. This protocol for measuring transcription activity is based on that described by Lipson and Baserga (16) except that, in our case, the hnRNA was assayed by qRT-PCR. Reactions without reverse transcriptase were performed as a negative control to rule out amplification from any residual genomic DNA, although these tests were always negative. The reactions were incubated at 50°C for 30 min followed by 95°C for 15 min to activate the Taq polymerase and amplification for 35 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, and at 58°C for 60 s. After the PCR, melting curves were acquired by a stepwise increase of the temperature from 55°C to 95°C to ensure that a single product was amplified in the reaction.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 times the control value (10). To illustrate the difference in the ASNS transcription activity at this time point between amino acidfed and amino aciddeprived HepG2 cells, the levels of heterogeneous nuclear RNA (hnRNA) were measured by qRT-PCR after an 8-h incubation in complete MEM or MEM His. Given that introns are rapidly removed from hnRNA during splicing, this procedure has been shown to be a valid measure of transcription, similar to the data obtained by nuclear run-on analysis (16). An increase in ASNS transcription activity of 9 times the control value was observed (Fig. 1). When the steady-state ASNS mRNA accumulation was measured using the same samples, an elevated level was also observed, reaching a maximum of
9 times the control. These data confirm our previous observation that induction of transcription substantially contributes to the increase in ASNS mRNA from histidine-deprived HepG2 cells (10).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25% of the transcripts initiating at the +1 site. Interestingly, activation of the gene by amino acid deprivation triggers the transcriptional machinery to favor a specific nucleotide, designated as +1, as the initiation site. This alignment of the initiation site at the +1 site coincides with a substantial increase in the overall transcription activity. There are many reports showing the existence of multiple transcription initiation sites for a particular gene, but only a few examples of stimulus-modified initiation. Recently, Howcroft et al. (17) reported that the major histocompatibility complex class I gene is transcriptionally regulated by 2 independent pathways during either basal or activated conditions. The authors propose that the 2 pathways recruit 2 different transcription factor complexes and consequently initiate transcription at 2 different regions within the core promoter. The basal transcription initiation is determined by the interaction between upstream stimulatory factor 1 and TBP associated factor II-250, but after activation, transcription initiates at a different cluster of start sites and is independent of TBP associated factor II-250 (17). Although the ASNS gene is the first example of nutrient availability modulating the transcription start site for a mammalian gene, an example exists in the methylotropic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. In this organism, the methanol oxidase gene, MOX, is transcribed from 2 different transcription start sites under the repressed and the derepressed conditions. A shift from glucose-containing medium to glycerol or methanol medium causes repression of the longer transcript and a strong activation from the initiation site that produces the shorter mRNA (18). The shorter mRNA is then efficiently translated into the functional MOX protein, which aids the cell in avoiding toxic levels of hydrogen peroxide.
Transcription initiation site selection is associated with cis-elements such as a TATA-box, an initiator sequence (Inr), or a TFIIB-responsive element (13,19). Mechanistic studies have identified TBP, TFIIB, TFIIF, and RNA polymerase II, as the major factors interacting with these DNA sequences and with each other during the transcription start site selection process (12,20). TFIIB binding influences the positioning of RNA polymerase II and thereby influences the transcription initiation site (21), and ChIP analysis of the ASNS gene has documented that TFIIB binding at the proximal promoter region is enhanced following amino acid limitation (10). The human ASNS gene has a prototypical TATA-box and a conserved Inr element. The increased binding of TBP following amino acid deprivation may also allow for the preinitiation complex to interact with the TATA-box in the ASNS promoter (10). Therefore, a regulatory mechanism for transcription start site selection may be activated during amino acid limitation. During the fed state, the ASNS gene, like many so-called housekeeping genes, exhibits a casual transcription start site determination. However, in response to amino acid limitation, binding of ATF4 and other NSRE1/NSRE2 binding proteins may direct recruitment of the general transcription/chromatin remodeling machinery and subsequently help assemble the preinitiation complex on the promoter in a selective and sequence-specific manner. The result is that the preinitiation complex preferentially assembles at the +1 site and a much higher rate of transcription is observed. Actual measurements of the transcription activity from the ASNS gene support this interpretation (Fig. 1). Another possibility is that occupation of NSRE1 or NSRE2 by ATF4 and other transcription factors may simply sterically block the less-efficient upstream start sites. However, the argument for steric hindrance is weakened by the observation that the NSRE1/NSRE2 enhancer is position-independent and can be moved further upstream or downstream of the promoter while continuing to mediate the increase in transcription (22).
To our knowledge, the present data represent the first demonstration in a mammalian cell that nutrient availability can modify the site of assembly of the transcription initiation machinery. The results also add to the breadth of steps, from DNA to RNA to protein, which are regulated by amino acid availability (1). How these control mechanisms, at multiple steps of protein expression, are coordinated during amino acid limitation, represents an interesting avenue for future investigation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used: ATF, activating transcription factor; ASNS, asparagine synthetase; MEM, minimal essential medium; MEM His, MEM lacking histidine; NSRE, nutrient sensing response element; nt, nucleotide; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; RPA, ribonuclease protection assay; TBP, TATA binding protein; TF, transcription factor. ![]()
Manuscript received 24 May 2006. Initial review completed 3 July 2006. Revision accepted 13 July 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Kilberg MS, Pan YX, Chen H, Leung-Pineda V. Nutritional control of gene expression: how mammalian cells respond to amino acid limitation. Annu Rev Nutr. 2005;25:5985.[Medline]
2. Fafournoux P, Bruhat A, Jousse C. Amino acid regulation of gene expression. Biochem J. 2000;351:112.[Medline]
3. Kilberg MS, Barbosa-Tessmann IP. Genomic sequences necessary for transcriptional activation by amino acid deprivation of mammalian cells. J Nutr. 2002;132:18014.
4. Kilberg MS, Zhong C, McClellan R, Pan Y-X. Transcriptional regulatory mechanisms for the response to amino acid deprivation of mammalian cells. 2004;524.
5. Barbosa-Tessmann IP, Pineda VL, Nick HS, Schuster SM, Kilberg MS. Transcriptional regulation of the human asparagine synthetase gene by carbohydrate availability. Biochem J. 1999;339:1518.[Medline]
6. Barbosa-Tessmann IP, Chen C, Zhong C, Schuster SM, Nick HS, Kilberg MS. Activation of the unfolded protein response pathway induces human asparagine synthetase gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3113944.
7. Barbosa-Tessmann IP, Chen C, Zhong C, Siu F, Schuster SM, Nick HS, Kilberg MS. Activation of the human asparagine synthetase gene by the amino acid response and the endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathways occurs by common genomic elements. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:2697685.
8. Siu F, Bain PJ, LeBlanc-Chaffin R, Chen H, Kilberg MS. ATF4 is a mediator of the nutrient-sensing response pathway that activates the human asparagine synthetase gene. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:241207.
9. Siu FY, Chen C, Zhong C, Kilberg MS. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPb) is a mediator of the nutrient sensing response pathway that activates the human asparagine synthetase gene. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:481007.
10. Chen H, Pan YX, Dudenhausen EE, Kilberg MS. Amino acid deprivation induces the transcription rate of the human asparagine synthetase gene through a timed program of expression and promoter binding of nutrient-responsive bZIP transcription factors as well as localized histone acetylation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:5082939.
11. Naar AM, Lemon BD, Tjian R. Transcriptional coactivator complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:475501.[Medline]
12. Smale ST, Kadonaga JT. The RNA polymerase II core promoter. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:44979.[Medline]
13. Taatjes DJ, Marr MT, Tjian R. Regulatory diversity among metazoan co-activator complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:40310.[Medline]
14. Zhang YP, Lambert MA, Cairney AEL, Wills D, Ray PN, Andrulis IL. Molecular structure of the human asparagine synthetase gene. Genomics. 1989;4:25965.[Medline]
15. Greco A, Gong SS, Ittmann M, Basilico C. Organization and expression of the cell cycle gene, ts 11, that encodes asparagine synthetase. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:23509.
16. Lipson KE, Baserga R. Transcriptional activity of the human thymidine kinase gene determined by a method using the polymerase chain reaction and an intron-specific probe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:97747.
17. Howcroft TK, Raval A, Weissman JD, Gegonne A, Singer DS. Distinct transcriptional pathways regulate basal and activated major histocompatibility complex class I expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:337791.
18. Genu V, Godecke S, Hollenberg CP, Pereira GG. The Hansenula polymorpha MOX gene presents two alternative transcription start points differentially utilized and sensitive to respiratory activity. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:246775.[Medline]
19. Smale ST. Transcription initiation from TATA-less promoters within eukaryotic protein-coding genes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1351:7388.[Medline]
20. Lemon B, Tjian R. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. Genes Dev. 2000;14:255169.
21. Fairley JA, Evans R, Hawkes NA, Roberts SG. Core promoter-dependent TFIIB conformation and a role for TFIIB conformation in transcription start site selection. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:6697705.
22. Zhong C, Chen C, Kilberg MS. Characterization of the nutrient sensing response unit in the human asparagine synthetase promoter. Biochem J. 2003;372:6039.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||