Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lii, C.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lii, C.-K.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:1034-1039, May 2005


Nutrient-Gene Interactions

Sulfur Amino Acid Restriction Induces the {pi} Class of Glutathione S-Transferase Expression in Primary Rat Hepatocytes1

Chia-Wen Tsai, Haw-Wen Chen, Jaw-Ji Yang*, Kai-Li Liu and Chong-Kuei Lii2

Department of Nutrition and * School of Dentistry, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cklii{at}csmu.edu.tw.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The regulation of genes by amino acids is attracting increasing attention. In the present study, we investigated the restriction of expression of the {pi} class of glutathione S-transferase (GST Yp) by sulfur amino acids. Hepatocytes isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats were cultured with L-15-based medium containing low (LSAA; 0.1 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.1 mmol/L L-cysteine) or high (HSAA; 0.5 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.2 mmol/L L-cysteine) amounts of sulfur amino acids for up to 6 d. Cellular protein contents did not differ between LSAA- and HSAA-treated cells over the entire period. In contrast, glutathione concentrations were suppressed by the LSAA medium and on d 6 were only 20% of those of HSAA-treated cells (P < 0.05). As shown by immunoblot analysis, GST Yp protein levels were greater in LSAA-treated cells than in HSAA-treated cells (P < 0.05). The induction of GST Yp by L-methionine and L-cysteine restriction was not affected by insulin and dexamethasone, but the latter suppressed GST Yp expression (P < 0.05). LSAA increased GST Yp mRNA levels and GST activity toward ethacrynic acid (P < 0.05). GST Yp induction occurred only in cells with a limited supply of L-methionine; restriction of L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, and L-phenylalanine had no significant effect. In contrast with the induction of GST Yp, the expression of the GST isoforms Ya and Yb was not changed by amino acid restriction. In conclusion, hepatic GST Yp gene expression is upregulated by a limited availability of sulfur amino acids.


KEY WORDS: • sulfur amino acids • glutathione S-transferase Yp • gene expression • primary hepatocytes • rats

Amino acids have multiple functions, i.e, they act as gluconeogenic substrates, as regulators of protein turnover, as neurotransmitters, and as precursors of signal transducers (1). A sufficient amino acid supply is required for normal cell growth and physiologic responses. When the amino acid supply is limited, several physiologic functions change through the regulation of the expression of numerous genes; such changes help an organism adapt to amino acid limitation. Growth retardation is one of the physiologic changes that occur with dietary protein restriction (2) and may be attributed in part to the overexpression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1),3 which reduces the available concentration of insulin-like growth factor (3).

Gene transcription in response to amino acid starvation has been well studied in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, and in eukaryotic yeast. In yeast, 2 control processes were shown, i.e., a specific control process, which is regulated by the specific amino acid end products, and a general control process, which is activated by a deficiency of any single amino acid (4,5). In mammals, however, the molecular mechanisms of gene regulation by amino acid starvation are still poorly understood (3,6,7). Candidate genes whose expression is regulated by amino acid starvation include those involved in amino acid metabolism, such as asparagine synthetase (8) and the cationic amino acid transporter cat-1 (9), and those involved in the regulation of cell growth, such as c-myc, c-jun (10), and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) (11). Genes involved in drug metabolism may also be modulated during protein malnutrition. In rats fed a protein-energy–deficient diet, protein levels of hepatic cytochrome P450 3A, 1A2, 2E1, and 2C1 were reduced by >50% (12,13), and such a reduction could be completely or partly normalized by simply replenishing the diet with L-cysteine or L-methionine (12). In contrast with the suppression of cytochrome P450 expression, glutathione S-transferase (GST) Ya2/3/5 and Yb1 mRNA levels in rat livers were increased by protein-energy restriction, and this increase was also normalized by L-cysteine or L-methionine supplementation (14).

GST is a phase II drug-metabolizing enzyme that catalyzes the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with a variety of electrophilic xenobiotics and facilitates their excretion. GST is composed of 6 distinct gene families: 5 cytosolic groups ({alpha}, µ, {pi}, {theta}, and {sigma}) and one microsomal form ({kappa}) (15). The families participate in a similar reaction in detoxification but have different substrate affinity. The class µ and {theta} GSTs participate in GSH conjugation with benz[a]anthracene epoxides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and also influence the production of oxidative DNA damage (16). There is growing interest in the physiologic properties of the {pi} class of GST (GST Yp), not only because of its drug detoxification activity but also because of its association with cell transformation, which may relate to carcinogenesis (17,18). GST Yp activity was used to evaluate the potency of chemoprevention agents in benzo[a]pyrene-induced cancer (19).

As stated, the induction of hepatic GST Ya2/3/5 and Yb1 mRNA levels by protein-energy restriction is reversed by simple L-cysteine or L-methionine replenishment (14). This suggests that L-cysteine or L-methionine deficiency acts to upregulate the transcription of various GST genes. It is of interest therefore to know whether the expression of other GST isozymes is also modulated in response to sulfur amino acid restriction. In the present study, we examined the activity and expression of GST Yp in primary rat hepatocytes cultured in an amino acid–restricted medium.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Materials. Sodium selenite, methionine, cysteine, ethacrynic acid, HEPES, and type VII rat tail collagen were obtained from Sigma Chemical. Insulin, transferrin, fetal bovine serum, and penicillin-streptomycin solution were obtained from Gibco Laboratory. Collagenase was purchased from Worthington Biochemica. Percoll was from Amersham Biosciences. Trizol was ordered from Invitrogen.

    Cell isolation and culture. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center and were used for hepatocyte isolation at age 7–8 wk. Rats were treated in compliance with the NIH guidelines (20). Hepatocytes were isolated by a 2-step collagenase perfusion method as described previously (21). Cell viability was >90% as determined by trypan blue exclusion. The isolated hepatocytes were suspended in L-15 cell culture medium containing 18 mmol/L HEPES, 5 mg/L transferrin, 5 µg/L selenium as sodium selenite, 1 g/L galactose, 1 x 105/L penicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin, and 2.5% fetal bovine serum. The cells were plated on 60-mm plastic tissue culture dishes (Falcon) precoated with rat tail collagen VII at a density of 2.5 x 106 cells per dish; the dishes were incubated in a 37°C humidified incubator in an air atmosphere. Cell attachment on the culture dish was achieved 4 h after plating, after which time the medium was changed. Thereafter, the medium was changed once daily, and the cells were cultured up to 6 d.

In Expt. 1, we investigated the effect of sulfur amino acid restriction on GST Yp expression. In this study, cells were cultured in either the L-15 control medium containing 0.5 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.2 mmol/L L-cysteine (high sulfur amino acid [HSAA] medium) or the L-15 medium containing 0.1 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.1 mmol/L L-cysteine (low sulfur amino acid [LSAA] medium). In addition, we examined the effect on GST Yp expression of insulin (5 mg/L) and dexamethasone (1 µmol/L), 2 commonly supplemented growth factors that are capable of modulating gene expression. For all treatments, cells were harvested at 24, 48, 96, and 144 h after plating.

In Expt. 2, 4 essential amino acids in addition to L-methionine and L-cysteine (L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, and L-phenylalanine) were tested to examine whether GST Yp expression is also regulated by nonsulfur-containing amino acids. In this study, hepatocytes were exposed to either an L-15 control medium (0.5 mmol/L Met, 0.2 mmol/L Cys, 1 mmol/L Ile, 1 mmol/L Leu, 0.5 mmol/L Lys, 0.75 mmol/L Phe) or a medium restricted in a single amino acid (i.e., 0.02 mmol/L each of L-methionine, L-cysteine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, or L-phenylalanine) for up to 4 d. The use of 0.02 mmol/L L-methionine was adapted from the physiologic serum concentration in rats fed a low-protein diet (3).

    SDS-PAGE and immunodetection. Cells were washed twice with cold PBS and were then harvested in 500 µL of 20 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Cell homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. The resultant supernatant fluid was then ultracentrifuged at 105,000 x g for an additional 1 h. Protein concentrations were measured with a Coomassie plus protein assay reagent kit (Pierce). Equal amounts of cytosolic proteins of each sample were applied to 10% SDS-PAGE gels and were transferred electrophoretically to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes as described by Towbin et al. (22). Nonspecific binding sites on the membranes were blocked at 4°C overnight with 50 g/L nonfat dry milk in buffer containing 15 mmol/L Tris and 150 mmol/L NaCl (pH 7.4). The membranes were then incubated with antibodies against GST Yp (Transduction Laboratories), Ya, Yb (Oxford Biomedical Research), or carbonic anhydrase III (CA III; kindly provided by Dr. Suzanne Hendrich, Iowa State University). After incubation with the peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, color was developed by adding hydrogen peroxide and tetrahydrochloride diaminobenzidine as peroxidase substrates.

    Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was extracted by using Trizol reagent. A cDNA probe was prepared by RT-PCR as described previously (23). Two pairs of oligonucleotide primers (forward: 5'-TTCAAGGCTCGCTCAAGTCCAC-3'; backward: 5'-CTTGAT-CTTGGGGCGGGCACTG-3') were designed on the basis of the published sequence of GST Yp (23,24). The PCR conditions were set as follows: denaturing at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min for 35 cycles followed by a 7-min extension at 72°C. The band corresponding to the GST Yp DNA fragment was labeled with {alpha}-32P-dCTP through use of an NEBlot kit (New England Biolabs) and was used as a probe. For Northern blot analysis, 20 µg of each RNA sample was separated electrophoretically on a 1%-agarose gel containing 6% formaldehyde and was then transferred to HyBond N+ membrane as previously described (23). The membrane was prehybridized for 2 h at 42°C in a solution containing 10X Denhardt’s reagent (0.2% Ficoll, 0.2% polyvinylpyrolidone, 0.2% bovine serum albumin), 5X SSPE (750 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L NaH2PO4, 5 mmol/L EDTA), 20 g/L SDS, 50% formamide, and 100 mg/L of single-stranded sheared salmon sperm DNA. The membrane was then hybridized in the same solution with an {alpha}-32P-labeled GST Yp cDNA probe at 42°C overnight. After the wash, autoradiography was performed by exposing the membrane to SuperRx X-ray film (Kodak) at –80°C with an intensifying screen. The bands on the X-ray film were measured with an AlphaImager 2000 (Alpha Innotech).

    Biochemical assays. GST activity was determined according to the method of Habig et al. (25) with the use of ethacrynic acid as the substrate because of its better specificity for the Yp class (26). Samples for intracellular GSH determination were prepared by adding 1 mL of 5% perchloric acid containing 2.5 mmol/L phenanthroline to each plate. The plates were scraped and the homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min. After iodoacetic acid derivation and fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene color development, the acid-soluble GSH and glutathione disulfide were determined by HPLC as described by Reed et al. (27).

    Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s test was used to test the significance of the effect of culture time or growth factors in each sulfur amino acid–treated group. A two-way ANOVA was used to test the interaction of sulfur amino acids and growth factors on the GST Yp protein level. The LSAA and HSAA groups were compared using Student’s t test. Differences with P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed with commercially available software (SAS Institute).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Effect of sulfur amino acids on GST Yp protein level. Regardless of the sulfur amino acid content of the medium, GST Yp protein expression increased with time of incubation (Fig. 1). However, GST Yp expression increased sooner in cells treated with LSAA medium, and on d 6, the relative GST Yp level was 94% higher in LSAA-treated cells than in HSAA-treated cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Effect of sulfur amino acid restriction on protein levels of GST Yp in primary rat hepatocytes. (A) After the 4-h attachment period, cells were left to incubate in the control medium (HSAA: 0.5 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.2 mmol/L L-cysteine) or were switched to the LSAA (0.1 mmol/L L-methionine and 0.1 mmol/L L-cysteine) for up to 6 d. For each lane, 5 µg of cytosol protein was separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and an immunoblot assay was performed. (B) Protein was quantitated by densitometry, and the level on d 1 for the HSAA-treated cells was regarded as 1. Each value represented the mean ± SD, n = 4 independent experiments. abcGroups in the same medium not sharing a letter differ, P < 0.05. #Different from HSAA at that incubation time, P < 0.05.

 
    Effect of growth factors on GST Yp protein expression. We then studied whether the effect of sulfur amino acids on GST Yp expression is influenced by insulin and dexamethasone, 2 commonly supplemented growth factors that modulate gene expression. GST Yp levels were suppressed by dexamethasone (Fig. 2). However, the suppression by dexamethasone did not change the upregulation of GST Yp by sulfur amino acid restriction, suggesting that the modulation of GST Yp expression was independent of dexamethasone. Insulin did not affect GST Yp expression.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 Effect of insulin and dexamethasone on the sulfur amino acid–mediated change in protein levels of GST Yp. Hepatocytes were cultured with HSAA or LSAA medium in the absence of growth factors (–) or in the presence of insulin (Ins) or dexamethasone (Dex), respectively, for 6 d. (A) Immunoblot assay of GST Yp protein levels. (B) Protein was quantitated by densitometry, and the level on d 6 for the HSAA-treated cells without growth factor was regarded as 1. Values are means ± SD, n = 3. abGroups in the same medium not sharing a letter differ, P < 0.05. #Different from HSAA at that incubation time, P < 0.05.

 
    GST Yp mRNA level and enzyme activity. Northern blots revealed that GST Yp mRNA expression was consistent with the protein expression. mRNA levels increased with time up to d 6 and were greater in cells treated with LSAA in the absence of insulin and dexamethasone than in those treated with HSAA (Fig. 3). mRNA expression was suppressed by dexamethasone but was not influenced by insulin. At d 6, GST enzyme activity was significantly higher in cells incubated in LSAA medium than in those incubated in HSAA medium [59.1 ± 15.3 vs. 43.8 ± 7.2 nmol/(min · mg protein)].



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3 mRNA levels of GST Yp in primary rat hepatocytes. Cells were cultured in either HSAA or LSAA medium in the absence of growth factors (–) or the presence of insulin (Ins) or dexamethasone (Dex), respectively, for up to 6 d. Values are means ± SD, n = 3 or 4. abGroups not sharing a letter differ, P < 0.05.

 
    Changes in cellular protein and GSH contents. Regardless of the concentration of L-methionine and L-cysteine, cellular protein contents decreased with time (Table 1). In the absence of insulin and dexamethasone, cellular protein contents after incubation in HSAA or LSAA medium for 6 d were 36 and 45% lower, respectively, than in freshly isolated hepatocytes (d 0). Insulin helped to some extent to maintain protein contents during the first 3 d of incubation in both HSAA and LSAA media. Dexamethasone, however, did not affect the decrease in protein content that occurred in the absence of growth factors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Changes of cellular protein contents of hepatocytes incubated in the normal L-15 medium (HSAA) or in the sulfur amino acids restricted-medium (LSAA)1, 2

 
Because both L-cysteine and L-methionine, which is converted to L-cysteine via the transsulfuration pathway, are limiting amino acids for GSH synthesis, changes in hepatic GSH contents were examined. With the HSAA medium, the intracellular GSH concentration increased gradually and reached a maximum at d 3 and then decreased (Fig. 4). Compared with the initial level, GSH concentrations were 100% higher on d 3 (62.6 compared with 30.6 nmol/mg protein). In the cells treated with LSAA medium, GSH decreased gradually throughout the culture period. At d 6, only 18% of the GSH measured on d 0 remained.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4 GSH contents of rat hepatocytes supplemented with different levels of sulfur amino acids. Cells were incubated in either HSAA or LSAA medium for up to 6 d. GSH contents were determined by HPLC. Values are the means ± SD, n = 5. abcGroups in the same medium not sharing a letter differ, P < 0.05. #Different from LSAA at that incubation time, P < 0.05.

 
    Effect of amino acid restriction on the expression of GST isozymes. Increases in GST Yp protein (Fig. 5A) and mRNA levels (Fig. 5B) occurred solely in cells with a limited L-methionine supply. Restriction of L-cysteine, L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, or L-phenylalanine had only minor or no effects on the expression of this detoxification enzyme. GST Yp protein expression increased dose dependently with greater L-methionine restriction (Fig. 5C).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5 The effect of amino acid restriction on the expression of GST isoforms and CA III in primary rat hepatocytes. (A) After a 4-d exposure to the L-15 control medium (–) or the medium restricted in L-methionine (Met), L-cysteine (Cys), L-isoleucine (Ile), L-leucine (Leu), L-lysine (Lys), or L-phenylalanine (Phe) (0.02 mmol/L each), GST Ya, Yb, and Yp, and CA III were immunostanined by antibody-linked peroxidase activity. (B) Northern blot analysis of GST Yp mRNA. (C) Dose-dependent change in GST Yp protein level of cells cultured in 0.02–0.5 mmol/L L-methionine for 4 d.

 
Compared with the upregulation of GST Yp by L-methionine restriction, the Ya and Yb isozymes of GST were not affected by any of the amino acids tested (Fig. 5A). In addition, amounts of CA III, an abundant cytosolic protein in male rat livers, were not changed by limiting the supply of L-methionine or that of L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, or L-phenylalanine.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Several lines of evidences indicate that amino acids not only act as protein and neurotransmitter precursors but also play a crucial role in controlling gene expression (28). In the present study, we showed that the expression of the {pi} class of GST, a phase II detoxification enzyme, was upregulated when hepatocytes were cultured in a sulfur amino acid–restricted medium and that such modulation was independent of dexamethasone and insulin. Furthermore, the lack of effect of the other essential amino acids tested, e.g., L-isoleucine, L-leucine, L-lysine, and L-phenylalanine, suggests that the induction of this GST isozyme is likely sulfur amino acid specific.

Amino acids are essential for maintaining normal cell function. In the face of amino acid starvation, adaptation occurs, which enhances amino acid biosynthesis by upregulating asparagine synthetase expression (29) and retards the growth rate by enhancing IGFBP expression (3). Drug metabolism in liver tissues is also modulated by feeding an energy-restricted diet (30). In contrast with the suppression of cytochrome P450 activity, GST Ya2/3/5 and Yb1 mRNA expression are upregulated by such malnutrition. Moreover, the upregulation of GST isozymes is diminished by replenishing the diet with cysteine or methionine, a finding that suggests the critical role of sulfur amino acids in the regulation of GST expression by protein-energy restriction (14). In the present study, we showed further that the expression of the Yp isozyme of GST in rat hepatocytes is enhanced by limiting the supply of sulfur amino acids in the culture medium. Although the upregulation of Yp expression occurred in cells cultured in medium restricted in L-methionine, but not in that restricted in L-cysteine, it must be emphasized that an effect of L-cysteine restriction on the regulation of GST Yp expression cannot be excluded. This lack of effect may be explained by the ability of hepatocytes to convert L-methionine to L-cysteine via the transsulfuration pathway. This newly synthesized L-cysteine acts to minimize the shortage of L-cysteine in the cell culture medium. Furthermore, L-cysteine in the medium was likely oxidized to L-cystine, thereby decreasing the availability of L-cysteine to cells. By the HPLC method (28), there was 11.4 ± 3.9% L-cysteine remaining after 24 h medium preparation (n = 3). These limitations make it difficult to determine precisely the actual effect of L-cysteine on Yp expression in this study.

The Yp isozyme of GST, little or none of which is found in normal rat liver, is continuously expressed after cell isolation, and this expression is modulated by various medium constituents, such as dexamethasone (21,31). In addition, we reported previously that FBS had a positive effect on GST Yp induction (32). In this study, we further demonstrate that the availability of sulfur amino acids modulates the expression of GST Yp in primary rat hepatocytes. Hepatocytes undergo dedifferentiation in primary culture. The induction of this detoxification enzyme seems to be the result of dedifferentiation, and this association may enhance cell survival after isolation. The expression of GST Yp is highly inducible by chemical carcinogens and is commonly used as the biochemical marker during hepatocarcinogenesis (33). The strong association of GST Yp expression with neoplastic cells has been regarded as a survival mechanism, which provides for the enhanced proliferation in a toxic environment (34).

In the present in vitro study, only GST Yp and not Ya or Yb was upregulated in response to sulfur amino acid restriction. This discrepancy in expression among the GST isozymes indicates that the gene regulation of GST Yp likely differs from that of Ya and Yb. Gene regulation involves a cascade of molecular events that activate the transcription factors, which in turn stimulate gene expression. In the GST Ya promoter/enhancer regions, 2 important DNA consensus sequences, an aryl hydrocarbon response element and an antioxidant response element (ARE) (35,36), were identified as being responsible for the induction of transcription when hepatocytes are exposed to various xenobiotics and prooxidants, including hydrogen peroxide, menadione, and tert-butyl hydroquinone (a phenolic antioxidant) (35).

Evidence suggests that the Nrf and small Maf protein families of transcription factors bind to the ARE and induce downstream genes (37,38). Activation of Nrf-1,2 binding to the ARE was shown to be important in the upregulation of hepatic GST Ya and Yb mRNA in protein-energy–malnourished rats (14). The activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase caused by GSH depletion was also shown to be essential for ARE-mediated GST Ya2 induction in H4IIE hepatoma cells cultured in methionine- and cysteine-deprived medium (39). In the present study, the GST Ya level was not changed in LSAA-treated hepatocytes even when the cellular GSH content was 20% that of the HSAA-treated cells. This raises the possibility that activation of the ARE by GSH depletion is cell-type specific or that the extent of GSH depletion in hepatocytes is insufficient to activate ARE-mediated GST Ya expression.

Compared with that for GST Ya, evidence for the molecular regulation of GST Yp transcription is limited. Although there are ARE-like elements in the promoter region of GST Yp, their role in GST Yp transcription is not yet fully understood. The lack of impairment of oltipraz- or 3H-1,2-dithiole-3-thione-induced GST Yp mRNA expression in Nrf2 knockout mice (40,41) suggests that GST Yp expression is not mediated by the Nrf2-ARE pathway. However, Ikeda et al. (42) reported that Nrf2 binding to ARE-like binding sites is involved in mouse GST Yp gene induction. Rat GST Yp can be activated by Nrf2-mediated induction in H4IIE hepatoma cells, but not in normal liver cells (43). Instead, GST Yp enhancer I (GPEI), which is located at –2.5 kb, may play a key role (44). GPEI contains 2 phorbol 12-O-tetradecanote 13-acetate response element (TRE)-like elements that have activating protein (AP)-1–like binding sites (45), and both are required for the basal and inducible expression of GST Yp (46,47). For instance, the TRE is essential for the induction of GST Yp transcription by 3,4,5,3',4'-penta-chlorinated biphenyl in primary hepatocytes (46). The inhibition of GST Yp mRNA and protein expression by dexamethasone that occurred in the present study (Figs. 2and 3) was also thought to occur via the AP-1 pathway because dexamethasone acts as an antagonist of AP-1 transcription factor (31). Although the actual molecular mechanism of the sulfur amino acid induction of GST Yp gene expression is not clear, TRE is not likely the sole answer because dexamethasone seems to be ineffective in blocking the upregulation of sulfur amino acid restriction (Fig. 2). Pathways other than the glucocorticoid-suppressed AP-1 binding to TRE, such as GSH depletion-activated ARE and other unidentified factors, are possible candidates.

CHOP and asparagine synthetase (AS) are 2 of the most studied mammalian genes whose expression is regulated by amino acids. The finding that leucine restriction induces CAT activity of reporter constructs containing a CHOP or an AS promoter region supports the involvement of response elements and transcriptional factors in the amino acid–induced transcription of CHOP and AS (29,48). Even so, the pattern of CHOP and AS expression in response to amino acid restriction differs somewhat. CHOP is strongly induced by methionine deprivation and only slightly induced by deprivation of histidine, cysteine, or asparagine. AS, however, is consistently induced in response to deprivation of any one of these amino acids (49). The discrepancy in CHOP and AS expression in response to amino acid restriction indicates that the regulation of the CHOP and AS genes differs to some extent. Because GST Yp induction occurred solely with sulfur amino acid restriction and not with restriction of L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-lysine, or L-phenylalanine, the mechanism of regulation of GST Yp by sulfur amino acids is probably different from the mechanism of regulation of CHOP and AS.

In mammals, several physiologic functions involved in the defense of or adaptation to amino acid starvation are adjusted through the regulation of the expression of numerous genes. The results of the present study clearly indicate that GST Yp gene expression is upregulated in primary rat hepatocytes by L-methionine and L-cysteine restriction. The lack of response to the other amino acids tested suggests that such an effect is probably sulfur amino acid specific. Further study is required of the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of GST Yp gene expression by L-methionine and L-cysteine.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 C.-K.L. was supported by NSC 93–2320-B-040–045. Back

3 Abbreviations used: AP, activating protein; ARE, antioxidant response element; AS, asparagine synthetase; CA III, carbonic anhydrase III; CHOP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) homologous protein; GPEI, glutathione S-transferase Yp enhancer I; GSH, glutathione; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HSAA, high sulfur amino acid; IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1; LSAA, low sulfur amino acid; TRE, phorbol 12-O-tetradecanote 13-acetate response element. Back

Manuscript received 24 September 2004. Initial review completed 25 October 2004. Revision accepted 3 January 2005.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. van Sluijters, D. A., Dubbelhuis, P. F., Blommaart, E. F. & Meijer, A. J. (2000) Amino-acid-dependent signal transduction. Biochem. J. 351:545-550.

2. Fliesen, T., Maiter, D., Gerard, G., Underwood, L. E., Maes, M. & Ketelslegers, J. M. (1989) Reduction of serum insulin-like growth factor-I by dietary protein restriction is age dependent. Pediatr. Res. 26:415-419.[Medline]

3. Jousse, C., Bruhat, A., Ferrara, M. & Fafournoux, P. (1998) Physiological concentration of amino acids regulates insulin-like-growth-factor-binding protein 1 expression. Biochem. J. 334:147-153.

4. Dever, T. E., Feng, L., Wek, R. C., Cigan, A. M., Donahue, T. F. & Hinnebusch, A. G. (1992) Phosphorylation of initiation factor 2 alpha by protein kinase GCN2 mediates gene-specific translational control of GCN4 in yeast. Cell 68:585-596.[Medline]

5. Hinnebusch, A. G. (1994) The eIF-2 alpha kinases: regulators of protein synthesis in starvation and stress. Semin. Cell Biol. 5:417-426.[Medline]

6. Entingh, A. J., Law, B. K. & Moses, H. L. (2001) Induction of the C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) by amino acid deprivation requires insulin-like growth factor I, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Endocrinology 142:221-228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Averous, J., Bruhat, A., Mordier, S. & Fafournoux, P. (2003) Recent advances in the understanding of amino acid regulation of gene expression. J. Nutr. 133:2040S-2045S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Gong, S. S., Guerrini, L. & Basilico, C. (1991) Regulation of asparagine synthetase gene expression by amino acid starvation. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:6059-6066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hyatt, S. L., Aulak, K. S., Malandro, M., Kilberg, M. S. & Hatzoglou, M. (1997) Adaptive regulation of the cationic amino acid transporter-1 (Cat-1) in Fao cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:19951-19957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Pohjanpelto, P. & Holtta, E. (1990) Deprivation of a single amino acid induces protein synthesis-dependent increases in c-jun, c-myc, and ornithine decarboxylase mRNAs in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:5814-5821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Marten, N. W., Burke, E. J., Hayden, J. M. & Straus, D. S. (1994) Effect of amino acid limitation on the expression of 19 genes in rat hepatoma cells. FASEB J. 8:538-544.[Abstract]

12. Cho, M. K., Kim, Y. G., Lee, M. G. & Kim, S. G. (1999) Suppression of rat hepatic cytochrome P450s by protein-calorie malnutrition: complete or partial restoration by cysteine or methionine supplementation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 372:150-158.[Medline]

13. Cancino-Badias, L., Reyes, R. E., Nosti, R., Perez, I., Dorado, V., Caballero, S., Soria, A., Camacho-Carranza, R., Escobar, D. & Espinosa-Aguirre, J. J. (2003) Modulation of rat liver cytochrome P450 by protein restriction assessed by biochemical and bacterial mutagenicity methods. Mutagenesis 18:95-100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Cho, M. K., Kim, Y. G., Lee, M. G. & Kim, S. G. (2000) The effect of cysteine on the altered expression of class alpha and mu glutathione S-transferase genes in the rat liver during protein-calorie malnutrition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1502:235-246.[Medline]

15. van Iersel, M. L., Verhagen, H. & van Bladeren, P. J. (1999) The role of biotransformation in dietary (anti)carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 443:259-270.[Medline]

16. Dusinska, M., Ficek, A., Horska, A., Raslova, K., Petrovska, H., Vallova, B., Drlickova, M., Wood, S. G. & Stupakova, A., et al (2001) Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms influence the level of oxidative DNA damage and antioxidant protection in humans. Mutat. Res. 482:47-55.[Medline]

17. Satoh, K., Kitahara, A., Soma, Y., Inaba, Y., Hatayama, I. & Sato, K. (1985) Purification, induction, and distribution of placental glutathione transferase: a new marker enzyme for preneoplastic cells in the rat chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:3964-3968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Tsuchida, S. & Sato, K. (1992) Glutathione transferases and cancer. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27:337-384.[Medline]

19. Hu, X., Benson, P. J., Srivastava, S. K., Xia, H., Bleicher, R. J., Zaren, H. A., Awasthi, S., Awasthi, Y. C. & Singh, S. V. (1997) Induction of glutathione S-transferase pi as a bioassay for the evaluation of potency of inhibitors of benzo(a)pyrene-induced cancer in a murine model. Int. J. Cancer 73:897-902.[Medline]

20. National Research Council (1985) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Publication no. 85–23 (rev.) 1985 National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD .

21. Wang, S. T., Chen, H. W., Sheen, L. Y. & Lii, C. K. (1997) Methionine and cysteine affect glutathione level, glutathione-related enzyme activities and the expression of glutathione S-transferase isozymes in rat hepatocytes. J. Nutr. 127:2135-2141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. & Gordon, J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:4350-4354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Chen, H. W., Yang, J. J., Tsai, C. W., Wu, J. J., Sheen, L. Y., Ou, C. C. & Lii, C. K. (2001) Dietary fat and garlic oil independently regulate hepatic cytochrome P(450) 2B1 and the placental form of glutathione S-transferase expression in rats. J. Nutr. 131:1438-1443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Suguoka, Y., Kano, T., Okuda, A., Sakai, M., Kitagawa, T. & Muramatsu, M. (1985) Cloning and the nucleotide sequence of rat glutathione S-transferase P cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:6049-6057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J. & Jakoby, W. B. (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 249:7130-7139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Mannervik, B., Alin, P., Guthenberg, C., Jensson, H., Tahir, M. K., Warholm, M. & Jornvall, H. (1985) Identification of three classes of cytosolic glutathione transferase common to several mammalian species: correlation between structural data and enzymatic properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:7202-7206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Reed, D. J., Babson, J. R., Beatty, P. W., Brodie, A. E., Ellis, W. W. & Potter, D. W. (1980) High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of nanomole levels of glutathione, glutathione disulfide, and related thiols and disulfides. Anal. Biochem. 106:55-62.[Medline]

28. Jousse, C., Bruhat, A. & Fafournoux, P. (1999) Amino acid regulation of gene expression. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2:297-301.[Medline]

29. Guerrini, L., Gong, S. S., Mangasarian, K. & Basilico, C. (1993) Cis- and trans-acting elements involved in amino acid regulation of asparagine synthetase gene expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 13:3202-3212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Anthony, L. E. (1973) Effects of protein-calorie malnutrition on drug metabolism in rat liver microsomes. J. Nutr. 103:811-820.

31. Aoki, Y., Matsumoto, M. & Suzuki, K. T. (1993) Expression of glutathione S-transferase P-form in primary cultured rat liver parenchymal cells by coplanar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners is suppressed by protein kinase inhibitors and dexamethasone. FEBS Lett. 333:114-118.[Medline]

32. Lii, C. K., Wang, S. T., Chen, H. W. & Sheen, L. Y. (1996) Glutathione and glutathione-related enzyme activities of male and female rat hepatocytes under various culture conditions. Arch. Toxicol. 70:822-829.[Medline]

33. Dwivedi, R. S., Primiano, T. & Novak, R. F. (1993) Xenobiotic-modulated expression of hepatic glutathione S-transferase genes in primary rat hepatocyte culture. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1174:43-53.[Medline]

34. Hendrich, S. & Pitot, H. C. (1987) Enzymes of glutathione metabolism as biochemical markers during hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Metast. Rev. 6:155-178.[Medline]

35. Rushmore, T. H., King, R. G., Paulson, K. E. & Pickett, C. B. (1990) Regulation of glutathione S-transferase Ya subunit gene expression: identification of a unique xenobiotic-responsive element controlling inducible expression by planar aromatic compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87:3826-3830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Rushmore, T. H. & Pickett, C. B. (1990) Transcriptional regulation of the rat glutathione S-transferase Ya subunit gene. Characterization of a xenobiotic-responsive element controlling inducible expression by phenolic antioxidants. J. Biol. Chem. 265:14648-14653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Dhakshinamoorthy, S. & Jaiswal, A. K. (2000) Small maf (MafG and MafK) proteins negatively regulate antioxidant response element-mediated expression and antioxidant induction of the NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 275:40134-40141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Nguyen, T., Huang, H. C. & Pickett, C. B. (2000) Transcriptional regulation of the antioxidant response element. Activation by Nrf2 and repression by MafK. J. Biol. Chem. 275:15466-15473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Kang, K. W., Ryu, J. H. & Kim, S. G. (2000) The essential role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in the antioxidant response element-mediated rGSTA2 induction by decreased glutathione in H4IIE hepatoma cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 58:1017-1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Kwak, M. K., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Sutter, T. R. & Kensler, T. W. (2001) Role of transcription factor Nrf2 in the induction of hepatic phase 2 and antioxidative enzymes in vivo by the cancer chemoprotective agent, 3H-1, 2-dimethiole-3-thione. Mol. Med. 7:135-145.[Medline]

41. Ramos-Gomez, M., Kwak, M. K., Dolan, P. M., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Talalay, P. & Kensler, T. W. (2001) Sensitivity to carcinogenesis is increased and chemoprotective efficacy of enzyme inducers is lost in nrf2 transcription factor-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:3410-3415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Ikeda, H., Serria, M. S., Kakizaki, I., Hatayama, I., Satoh, K., Tsuchida, S., Muramatsu, M., Nishi, S. & Sakai, M. (2002) Activation of mouse Pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene by Nrf2 (NF-E2-related factor 2) and androgen. Biochem. J. 364:563-570.[Medline]

43. Ikeda, H., Nishi, S. & Sakai, M. (2004) Transcription factor Nrf2/MafK regulates rat placental glutathione S-transferase gene during hepatocarcinogenesis. Biochem. J. 380:515-521.[Medline]

44. Sakai, M., Okuda, A. & Muramatsu, M. (1988) Multiple regulatory elements and phorbol 12-O-tetradecanoate 13-acetate responsiveness of the rat placental glutathione transferase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:9456-9460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Angel, P., Imagawa, M., Chiu, R., Stein, B., Imbra, R. J., Rahmsdorf, H. J., Jonat, C., Herrlich, P. & Karin, M. (1987) Phorbol ester-inducible genes contain a common cis element recognized by a TPA-modulated trans-acting factor. Cell 49:729-739.[Medline]

46. Matsumoto, M., Imagawa, M. & Aoki, Y. (1999) Identification of an enhancer element of class Pi glutathione S-transferase gene required for expression by a co-planar polychlorinated biphenyl. Biochem. J. 338:599-605.

47. Okuda, A., Imagawa, M., Maeda, Y., Sakai, M. & Muramatsu, M. (1989) Structural and functional analysis of an enhancer GPEI having a phorbol 12-O-tetradecanoate 13-acetate responsive element-like sequence found in the rat glutathione transferase P gene. J. Biol. Chem. 264:16919-16926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Bruhat, A., Jousse, C., Wang, X. Z., Ron, D., Ferrara, M. & Fafournoux, P. (1997) Amino acid limitation induces expression of CHOP, a CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-related gene, at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. J. Biol. Chem. 272:17588-17593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Jousse, C., Bruhat, A., Ferrara, M. & Fafournoux, P. (2000) Evidence for multiple signaling pathways in the regulation of gene expression by amino acids in human cell lines. J. Nutr. 130:1555-1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C.-W. Tsai, J.-J. Yang, H.-W. Chen, L.-Y. Sheen, and C.-K. Lii
Garlic Organosulfur Compounds Upregulate the Expression of the {pi} Class of Glutathione S-Transferase in Rat Primary Hepatocytes
J. Nutr., November 1, 2005; 135(11): 2560 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lii, C.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsai, C.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Lii, C.-K.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2005 by American Society for Nutrition