Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kritsch, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ney, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kritsch, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ney, D. M.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:479-485, March 2005


Nutrient Metabolism

Hypoenergetic High-Carbohydrate or High-Fat Parenteral Nutrition Induces a Similar Metabolic Response with Differential Effects on Hepatic IGF-I mRNA in Dexamethasone-Treated Rats1

Karen R. Kritsch, Sangita Murali, Martin L. Adamo*, Murray K. Clayton{dagger} and Denise M. Ney2

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706; * Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229; and {dagger} Departments of Statistics and Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ney{at}nutrisci.wisc.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The optimal level of energy for critically ill patients who require parenteral nutrition (PN) is unclear. Our objective was to determine whether 50% energy (50%E) restriction due to a reduction in carbohydrate or fat, with provision of adequate protein and micronutrients, ameliorates the detrimental effects of dexamethasone (Dex) on body protein catabolism, insulin resistance, and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) responses in rats administered PN. The experiment included 6 PN groups, adequate energy (AE) ± Dex, 50% AE with high carbohydrate (50%E{uparrow}CHO) ± Dex and 50% AE with high fat (50%E{uparrow}FAT) ± Dex. There was a significant interaction between energy level and Dex such that the increase in body catabolism due to 50%E from {uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT was reduced by ~50%, although the amount of body weight and nitrogen lost over 7 d was significantly greater with 50%E than with AE. AE+Dex induced a 60% increase in liver mass, whereas 50%E+Dex reduced the increase to 26%. AE+Dex induced a 5-fold increase in serum insulin level, whereas 50%E+Dex normalized the insulin to glucose ratio. Serum IGF-I levels were reduced 14–18% by Dex and 30% by 50%E. Hepatic immunoreactive IGF-I was significantly correlated with serum IGF-I and nitrogen balance. 50%E{uparrow}CHO and 50%E{uparrow}FAT had differential effects on hepatic IGF-I mRNA with a 40% decrease in IGF-I mRNA due to 50%E{uparrow}FAT+Dex. In summary, {uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT hypoenergetic PN with adequate protein had similar effects in normalizing hyperinsulinemia, attenuating hepatomegaly, and reducing the increment, but not the total amount of body protein catabolism, induced by glucocorticoid excess.


KEY WORDS: • glucocorticoids • insulin • nitrogen catabolism • insulin-like growth factor-I

Parenteral nutrition (PN)3 is often required to provide nutritional support for critically ill patients. Provision of adequate energy during catabolic illness can slow the rate of net protein catabolism but cannot prevent the loss of body protein induced by the neurohormonal response to stress (13). Thus, it is difficult to define the optimal level of energy for critically ill patients, although it is clear that overfeeding worsens the complications associated with PN (4). Catabolic or critical illness is associated with elevated levels of glucocorticoids (1), which can be replicated in animal models by administration of dexamethasone (Dex). Daily injections of a large dose of Dex induces many of the general features characteristic of the neurohormonal response to stress, including decreased appetite and food intake (5,6), protein catabolism (2,7), suppression of the immune system (8,9), and insulin resistance (7,10). However, Dex treatment does not reflect the spectrum of symptoms observed in a specific type of critical illness such as head injury or burns. In this study, we evaluated the effect of hypoenergetic PN on metabolism and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) responses in rats with Dex-induced catabolism.

IGF-I is an anabolic hormone whose production is regulated by dietary intake of protein and energy such that changes in IGF-I generally reflect nutritional status (11). Growth hormone (GH) stimulates hepatic production of IGF-I, the major source of circulating IGF-I, and IGF-I mediates many of the anabolic effects of GH (12). A decrease in circulating concentration of IGF-I due to elevated levels of glucocorticoids during critical illness (11) may explain the inability of nutrition to prevent loss of body protein during critical illness. In support of this notion, we demonstrated that whole-body catabolism induced by Dex in parenterally fed rats is associated with downregulation of the hepatic IGF-I endocrine system at the post-transcriptional level when adequate nutrition is provided (2). Moreover, the whole-body protein catabolism and insulin resistance induced by Dex can be reduced by co-infusion of IGF-I with PN solution (2,7). Thus, IGF-I appears to modulate the metabolic response to catabolic illness, possibly by improving insulin sensitivity.

The total amount and source of nonprotein macronutrient energy may be critical for maintaining normal circulating levels of insulin and IGF-I and attenuating loss of body protein during critical illness (3,12). For example, hypoenergetic PN may be beneficial in reducing the stimulus for insulin secretion and the hepatic complications of PN, although few controlled studies have addressed this (4,13). The literature reflects conflicting studies regarding the relative effects of carbohydrate and fat in modulating nitrogen balance and IGF-I levels (12,1418). Moreover, the mechanisms of nutritional regulation of hepatic IGF-I gene expression are largely undefined in models of energy restriction, other than fasting (1924). In addition, well-designed dietary controls are lacking in studies in which energy is restricted and feeding patterns are changed. For example, by reducing fat, energy density is reduced and animals are stimulated to eat more (25).

This study sought to better define optimal levels of parenteral energy during catabolic illness by examining metabolic and IGF-I responses in Dex-treated rats administered adequate and hypoenergetic PN. Our objective was to determine whether 50% energy (50%E) restriction due to a specific reduction in either carbohydrate or fat, with provision of adequate protein and micronutrients, ameliorated the detrimental effects of Dex on body protein catabolism, insulin resistance, and serum and hepatic IGF-I responses. The PN rat model provides precise nutritional control that is required to maintain constant energy intake per kilogram of body weight (BW) for our experimental design (2).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Experimental design

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (220–240g) were acclimated to a 12-h light:dark cycle at 22°C for 3 d; they consumed a modified AIN 93G semipurified diet and water ad libitum (26). Rats were food deprived 18 h before the placement of a catheter into the right jugular vein for a continuous 24 h/d infusion of a PN solution using a swivel infusion device (27). The University of Wisconsin-Madison Animal Care and Use Committee approved the facilities and protocol.

The experiment included 6 parenterally fed groups that were randomized as an incomplete block design (28): adequate energy (AE) ± Dex, 50% AE with high carbohydrate (50%E{uparrow}CHO) ± Dex and 50% AE with high fat (50%E{uparrow}FAT) ± Dex. The first block had the combinations: AE+Dex (n = 4), AE–Dex (n = 4), 50%E{uparrow}FAT+Dex (n = 8), and 50%E{uparrow}FAT–Dex (n = 8). The second block had the combinations: AE+Dex (n = 5), AE–Dex (n = 4), 50%E{uparrow}CHO+Dex (n = 8), and 50%E{uparrow}CHO–Dex (n = 8). The success rate was 90–92% with a final sample size of 8 rats per treatment group, except for the AE+Dex group, which had 9 rats, and a final sample size in total of 49 rats. Rats were administered PN for 7 d and received i.p. injections of 70 µg/d Dex or saline (29). Adequate energy, previously defined by Tao et al. (30) and Lasekan (27), provided 967-1025 nonprotein kJ/(kg BW · d); 50%E provided 485–515 nonprotein kJ/(kg BW · d).

    PN solutions. The PN solutions were prepared aseptically using commercial preparations of amino acids plus electrolytes (8.5% Travasol, Baxter), 60% dextrose (Baxter), 20% Intralipid (Baxter), vitamins (Astra USA), and trace elements (Multitrace-4, American Regent Laboratories), Table 1. All solutions contained 43 g amino acids/L and were formulated to be isovolumetric. Gradual infusion of PN solution began postsurgery (20 mL on the day of surgery, 40 mL on d 1) and was increased to deliver treatment energy requirements from d 2 through 7 (60 mL/d).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Composition of parenteral nutrition solutions

 
The PN solution providing AE contained 216 g/L dextrose and 20 g/L lipid (100 mL 20% Intralipid). The 50%E PN solutions were formulated by a reduction in either fat (50%E{uparrow}CHO) or CHO (50%E{uparrow}FAT) with no change in protein, vitamins, minerals, or volume of the solutions. The 50%E{uparrow}CHO solution provided 107 g/L dextrose and 2 g/L lipid to provide essential fatty acids. The 50%E{uparrow}FAT solution provided 54 g/L dextrose and 20 g/L lipid. These solutions provided a nonprotein energy carbohydrate to fat ratio of 80:20 (AE), 95:5 (50%E{uparrow}CHO), and 49:51 (50%E{uparrow}FAT). The percentage of total energy provided by protein, carbohydrate, and fat for the 3 PN solutions is as follows: AE, 16% protein, 68% carbohydrate, and 16% fat; 50%E{uparrow}CHO, 31% protein, 66% carbohydrate and 3% fat; and 50%E{uparrow}FAT, 31% protein, 34% carbohydrate, and 35% fat.

Because of the dramatic weight loss induced by 50%E and Dex, the PN solutions were reformulated on d 4, 5, and 6 to decrease the amount of energy provided from fat and carbohydrate (29). This was required to maintain a constant energy intake per unit body weight throughout the 7-d study. The solution was reformulated for the 50%E{uparrow}CHO+Dex group as follows (g/L dextrose and lipid, respectively): d 4 and 5, 101 and 2; d 6, 95 and 2. The solution was reformulated for the 50%E{uparrow}FAT+Dex group as follows (g/L dextrose and lipid, respectively): d 4 and 5, 48 and 20; d 6, 42 and 20. The amount of PN solution infused was calculated by determining the differences in weights of the infusion bags over a 24-h period. The AE groups received a mean of 971–996 nonprotein kJ/(kg BW · d) and the 50%E groups received 456–510 nonprotein kJ/(kg BW · d) on d 2 through 7. The variance in the amount of energy infused within a treatment group was <2%.

    Body weight, nitrogen analysis and tissue collection. Body weights were recorded daily. Urine was collected and the volume was recorded daily; boric acid was added to a final concentration of 0.01% and samples were stored at 4°C. Urinary nitrogen was determined by micro-Kjeldahl analysis as previously described (7). Nitrogen balance was determined daily and then summed to determine cumulative N balance over the 7-d study period to reflect the changes in lean body mass that accompanied the net changes in body weight. On d 7, ~24h after the last injection of Dex, the rats were exsanguinated between 800 and 1100 h, after i.v. injection of 18 mg ketamine/kg body weight within 5 min of stopping the PN. Blood was collected and partitioned for deproteinized blood or centrifuged at 1700 x g for 15 min to isolate for serum.

We assessed the absolute and relative (g/100 g BW) wet weights of selected tissues and organs including liver and kidney as a reflection of increased nitrogen catabolism, thymus as a reflection of immune function, and gastrocnemius muscle as an index of skeletal muscle mass. Tissues, including liver, kidney, right and left gastrocnemius muscle, and thymus, were collected, weighed, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The mass reported for gastrocnemius muscle is the sum of the mass of the right and left muscles.

    Hormone concentrations. Total serum IGF-I concentrations were measured by a double antibody RIA (31) after removal of IGF-I binding proteins by HPLC under acidic conditions. Materials included recombinant human (rh)IGF-I as a standard, 125I-rhIGF-I (Amersham), polyclonal antibody to human IGF-I (National Hormone and Pituitary Program), goat anti-rabbit IgG, and normal rabbit serum (Antibodies). The concentration of immunoreactive IGF-I in liver was measured by RIA after IGF-I was extracted from liver (2). Serum concentrations of insulin and GH were measured using RIA kits (Linco Research and Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, respectively). Concentrations of glucose in deproteinized blood were measured using the glucose oxidase technique (32).

    Liver IGF-I RNase protection assay (RPA). Total RNA was extracted from liver (TRIzol Reagent, Gibco BRL Life Technologies) and the integrity confirmed by visualizing ethidium bromide–stained 18S and 28S rRNA on an agarose/formaldehyde gel. RPAs were performed with total liver RNA and nontarget yeast RNA, and saturating amounts of IGF-I Exon-2 and 18S probes. A 464-bp 32P-labeled antisense RNA probe complementary to Exon-2 derived c-DNA template (29,33) was synthesized to detect IGF-I mRNA. A 128-bp 18S ribosomal RNA antisense probe was transcribed from a pTRI RNA 18S antisense control template (Ambion). When hybridized with total liver RNA, Exon 2-containing IGF-I mRNAs protected a doublet at 305 bp and a band at 290 bp, reflecting different Exon 2 transcription start sites, and a band at 238 bp, reflecting total Exon 1-containing IGF-I mRNAs (29,33). The 18S probe protected a closely migrating doublet at 80 bp. All RPAs were performed using the Hybspeed RPA Kit (Ambion). Briefly, 10 µg of total liver RNA or yeast RNA was coprecipitated with saturating amounts of Exon-2 and 18S probes, resuspended in buffer at 95°C, and hybridized at 68°C for 10 min. Samples were digested with RNA A/T1 for 30 min at 37°C and precipitated at –70°C overnight. Pellets were resuspended in gel loading buffer and electrophoresed on 5% acrylamide:8 mol/L urea gel. The gels were vacuum dried and quantitatively analyzed by phosphorimage analysis. Levels of IGF-I mRNA transcript were normalized for 18S ribosomal RNA and expressed as fold increases relative to AE control. RPAs were performed in duplicate gels with 2–3 samples per treatment group on each gel.

    Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using SAS (version 8.0, SAS Institute) taking into account block x treatment effects. No significant block effects were found; thus, the remaining analyzes were performed using 1-way ANOVA. A series of contrasts were used to examine the following primary treatment effects among the groups (28,29): 1) the main effect of energy, 2) the main effect of Dex, 3) the interaction between energy level and Dex, and 4) the interaction between nonprotein macronutrient composition and Dex during 50%E intake. Hepatic IGF-I mRNA and serum GH were the only variables to show a significant contrast for the interaction between nonprotein macronutrient composition and Dex during 50%E intake. Thus, data are shown as combined {uparrow}CHO and {uparrow}FAT 50%E groups for all variables except IGF-I and GH. Statistics were performed on log-transformed data for serum concentrations of IGF-I because residual plots indicated unequal variance among groups. Data are presented as means ± SE. Means that differed at P < 0.05 were identified by the PLSD test after 1-way ANOVA.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Changes in body weight and nitrogen balance. Energy intake was positively correlated with change in body weight (r = 0.82, P = 0.0001). Change in body weight was positively correlated with nitrogen balance (r = 0.91, P = 0.0001). As expected, both Dex treatment and 50%E restriction induced significant weight loss and negative nitrogen balance; however, there was a significant interaction between energy level and Dex, Figure 1. Rats treated with Dex and restricted to 50%E showed a reduction in the increment of weight loss (P = 0.0001) and cumulative nitrogen balance (P = 0.035) compared with rats not treated with Dex. More specifically, in Dex-treated rats, 50%E restriction induced a weight loss of –18 g/7 d, a change in body weight from –23 g/7 d with adequate energy to –41 g/7 d. In rats not treated with Dex, 50%E restriction induced a weight loss of –42 g/7 d, a change in body weight from +26 g/7 d with adequate energy to –15 g/7 d. Similarly, the increment in nitrogen loss due to Dex was reduced by ~50%, although the absolute amount of N loss was significantly greater with 50%E compared with AE. The magnitude of the loss in body weight and negative nitrogen balance did not differ with {uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT 50%E (data not shown), suggesting that intake of carbohydrate or fat induces a similar loss of body protein under conditions of 50%E.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Final body weights (A), 7-d body weight change (B) and 7-d cumulative nitrogen balance (C) in parenterally fed rats given AE ± Dex and 50%E ({uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT) ± Dex. Body weight change was positively correlated with cumulative nitrogen balance (r = 0.91, P = 0.0001). Values are means ± SE; AE, n = 8, AE+Dex, n = 9; 50%E{uparrow}CHO, n = 16, 50%E{uparrow}FAT, n = 16. Means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.

 
    Serum hormones. As expected, Dex significantly increased serum insulin level and 50%E restriction significantly reduced serum insulin level, Figure 2. There was a significant interaction between energy level and Dex (P = 0.0003) such that 50%E restriction significantly attenuated the ability of Dex to induce hyperinsulinemia. In rats treated with Dex, 50%E restriction reduced serum insulin levels from 2005 ± 176 pmol/L with adequate energy to 196 ± 38 pmol/L, a decrease of 90%, whereas in rats not treated with Dex, 50% energy restriction reduced insulin levels from 320 ± 43 pmol/L with adequate energy to 86 ± 12 pmol/L, a decrease of 73%. High-CHO or {uparrow}FAT 50%E treatments both reduced Dex-induced hyperinsulinemia to a similar extent. In this model in which glucose was continuously infused, 50%E restriction reduced blood glucose concentrations from 6.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L in the AE+Dex group to 4.8 ± 0.2 mmol/L in the 50%E±Dex groups (P = 0.007). The ratio of insulin to glucose was significantly increased by Dex and significantly reduced by 50%E restriction. There was significant interaction between energy level and Dex (P < 0.0004) due to a greater incremental decrease in the insulin to glucose ratio with 50%E restriction in rats treated with Dex compared with rats not treated with Dex.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 Serum insulin (A), glucose (B), and the insulin to glucose ratio (C) in parenterally fed rats given AE ± Dex and 50%E ({uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT) ± Dex.. Values are means ± SE. Means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.

 
We determined the serum concentration of IGF-I because circulating IGF-I derives primarily from the liver and provides negative feedback to suppress GH secretion (34) and serum concentration of GH, Table 2. Serum IGF-I levels were positively correlated with nitrogen balance (r = 0.61, P = 0.0002) and final body weight (r = 0.62, P = 0.0001). Serum IGF-I levels were reduced 14–18% by Dex and 30% by 50%E{uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT feeding with no significant interaction between Dex, energy level, and nonprotein energy source. Thus, unlike serum insulin levels and changes in body weight and N balance, 50%E did not diminish the effect of Dex on serum IGF-I level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Serum IGF-I and GH concentrations in parenterally fed rats given AE ± Dex and 50%E ({uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT) ± Dex1

 
Treatment with Dex significantly increased serum GH levels ~2-fold in association with reduced serum IGF-I levels in rats given adequate or 50%E. In Dex-treated rats, 50%E{uparrow}CHO resulted in a significantly higher serum GH level than was observed with 50%E{uparrow}FAT. Restriction to 50%E without Dex treatment did not alter serum GH levels in association with the 30% decrease in serum IGF-I levels.

    Liver IGF-I axis: IGF-I mRNA and immunoreactive IGF-I. There were no significant alterations in steady-state liver IGF-I mRNA abundance due to Dex administration or energy restriction, Figure 3. There was a significant interaction of Dex and nonprotein macronutrient source in the 50%E rats (P = 0.0075). These data show that in the presence of Dex, a high-CHO solution maintains IGF-I mRNA compared with a high-fat solution, which decreased IGF-I mRNA by 40%.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3 Liver IGF-I mRNA and immunoreactive IGF-I in parenterally fed rats given AE ± Dex and 50%E ({uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT) ± Dex. (A) A representative RPA showing liver IGF-I mRNA and ribosomal 18S as a control. M, nucleotide marker; P, probe without RNase treatment where {cjs3560} represents the Exon 2 derived IGF-I riboprobe and * represents the 18S riboprobe. (B) Liver IGF-I mRNA band intensities, gathered by phosphor image analysis, are expressed as a ratio to the 18S control and relative to the AE control (n = 5–7/group). Gels were performed in duplicate. (C) Liver immunoreactive IGF-I. Values are means ± SE; AE+Dex, n = 9, all other groups, n = 8. Means without a common letter differ, P < 0.05.

 
Dex decreased liver immunoreactive IGF-I levels by ~40% (P = 0.0001) independently of energy level and nonprotein macronutrient composition (Fig. 3). Liver IGF-I levels were not correlated with liver IGF-I mRNA, but were correlated with serum IGF-I concentrations (r = 0.54, P = 0.0001) and nitrogen balance (r = 0.61, P = 0.0002). These data support the notion that Dex regulates IGF-I gene expression at a translational or post-translational level (2). Moreover, 50%E does not significantly alter steady-state IGF-I mRNA abundance or hepatic immunoreactive IGF-I in our PN model of continuous infusion, although serum concentration of IGF-I was reduced 30%.

    Organ weights. Dex administration had a greater effect than 50%E restriction on changes in relative organ weights, Table 3. Administration of Dex significantly increased the relative mass of liver; however, there was an interaction between energy level and Dex (P < 0.0001) such that 50%E significantly attenuated the hepatomegaly induced by Dex. More specifically, in rats treated with Dex compared with AE without Dex treatment, relative liver weight was increased by 60% with AE compared with a 26% increase with 50%E from {uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT (P = 0.0001). Relative kidney mass was significantly increased by both Dex and 50%E without a significant interaction between Dex and energy level. Consistent with suppression of immunity, the relative mass of thymus was significantly decreased by both Dex and 50%E without significant interaction between Dex and energy level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Relative tissue wet weights and their percentage of the AE group, without Dex treatment, in parenterally fed rats given AE ± Dex and 50%E ({uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT) ± Dex1

 
The relative mass of gastrocnemius muscle did not differ among the groups receiving AE or 50%E, with or without Dex (Table 3, P = 0.54), suggesting that the proportion of body weight that is skeletal muscle mass is maintained to a similar extent with weight loss induced by either Dex or 50%E. Interestingly, a contrast comparison between the two groups receiving 50%E without Dex treatment (29) showed that administration of 50%E{uparrow}CHO was associated with a significantly greater relative muscle mass compared with 50%E{uparrow}FAT (1.16 ± 0.03 vs. 0.89 ± 0.05 g/100 g BW, P = 0.0012). These data suggest that under conditions of energy restriction without Dex treatment, CHO spares gastrocnemius muscle mass to a greater degree than does FAT; however, this effect was not observed using the same contrast comparison in body weight change (P = 0.15) or nitrogen balance (P = 0.47).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The optimal level of energy for critically ill patients who require PN is unclear. Provision of an optimal energy level that helps preserve lean body mass and avoids overfeeding is an essential component of nutritional support and care. Overfeeding exacerbates the complications of PN including hepatic steatosis, hyperglycemia, and sepsis, and also makes it difficult to wean patients from mechanical ventilation because of hypercapnia (4,35). Protein catabolism and weight loss may still occur when optimal energy is presumably provided because of the neurohormonal response to stress including elevated levels of glucocorticoids and reduced IGF-I levels (1,2). Thus, hypoenergetic PN is often suggested for the catabolic patient in the intensive care unit, although few controlled studies have addressed the efficacy of this approach (4,13,35).

To further understand energy needs during critical illness associated with glucocorticoid excess, we investigated how hypoenergetic PN modulates metabolism and IGF-I responses in rats treated with a catabolic dose of Dex. This study reports the benefits of 50%E restriction during PN due to a specific reduction in carbohydrate or fat, with provision of adequate micronutrients and protein, on the detrimental effects of Dex on body protein catabolism, hyperinsulinemia, and serum and hepatic IGF-I system responses. We conclude that hypoenergetic PN improved two aspects associated with Dex-induced catabolism, i.e., hyperinsulinemia and hepatomegaly. Whole-body catabolism was worsened because loss of lean body mass was significantly greater with 50%E than with AE. However, the increment in body catabolism induced by Dex was reduced by ~50% in rats given 50%E, suggesting some protection from the catabolic effects of Dex. The reduction in Dex-induced hepatomegaly with 50%E suggests that hypoenergetic PN reduced the potential for hepatic dysfunction.

Dex induces insulin resistance at the level of impaired glucose uptake via a postinsulin receptor mechanism (10). This was apparent in the current study from the dramatic 5-fold increase in insulin levels in Dex-treated rats given AE. Strikingly, 50%E normalized circulating levels of insulin and glucose in Dex-treated rats such that the ratio of insulin to glucose was not significantly different compared with rats given AE or 50%E without Dex. We speculate that the reduction in hepatomegaly and the diminished increment in catabolic response to Dex with 50%E reflects normalization of insulin levels (4,36). These data show that energy level is a key determinant of circulating glucose and insulin concentrations during glucocorticoid excess. Avoidance of hyperglycemia is an important factor in defining an optimal energy level for critically ill patients, especially for overweight and obese individuals with insulin resistance (37).

The IGF-I system generally reflects the metabolic and nutritional state such that inadequate intake of energy or protein decreases serum concentration of IGF-I and downregulates hepatic IGF-I production (11,12). In the current study, IGF-I responses reflected nutritional status because increased whole-body catabolism was significantly correlated with decreased serum and liver IGF-I concentrations. We confirm that Dex-induced downregulation of hepatic IGF-I production occurred at a translational or post-translational level with AE (2), extending our understanding of how Dex regulates hepatic IGF-I expression under conditions of 50%E due to restriction of either fat or carbohydrate. Interestingly, in the presence of Dex, 50%E{uparrow}CHO maintained IGF-I mRNA compared with 50%E{uparrow}FAT, which decreased IGF-I mRNA by 40%. These data suggest that Dex induced a different mechanism of regulation, possibly involving decreased transcription, inhibited transcriptional processing, or decreased IGF-I mRNA stability when 50% energy restriction was achieved by a reduction in carbohydrate. Transcription of the IGF-I gene may be induced by carbohydrate similarly to the presence of glucose-response elements for the L-pyruvate kinase, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, and S14 genes (38). Goya et al. (39) reported that glucose increased IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA and mature peptide secretion in fetal rat hepatocytes.

Energy restriction reduces growth and liver IGF-I expression. Straus et al. (40) showed that rats fed a diet with adequate dietary protein with total energy restricted to 70, 60, or 50% of ad libitum consumption for 10 d, due to a reduction in dietary carbohydrate, had similar fold decreases in serum IGF-I and hepatic IGF-I mRNA levels, suggesting downregulation of hepatic IGF-I production at the transcriptional level with energy restriction. In contrast, our model showed a significant 30% reduction in serum IGF-I and no significant differences in steady-state liver IGF-I mRNA abundance (P = 0.71) or in liver immunoreactive IGF-I (P = 0.27) in rats fed 50%E compared with AE. One explanation is that the decrease in serum IGF-I with energy restriction may be due to increased clearance of IGF-I from serum because of continuous parenteral infusion of nutrient solutions with a dextrose concentration of 4–10%. Alternatively, a consistent elevation in serum glucose level due to continuous glucose infusion with hypoenergetic PN, compared with lower mean daily serum glucose levels in meal-fed rats who tend to consume most of their daily food in 1 or 2 meals when energy intake is restricted (7), may also explain the maintenance of liver IGF-I mRNA levels in our model (40).

In conclusion, {uparrow}CHO or {uparrow}FAT hypoenergetic PN normalized hyperinsulinemia, attenuated hepatomegaly, and diminished the increment, but not the total amount of body protein catabolism induced by Dex treatment. These data also suggest that carbohydrate and fat may differentially regulate hepatic IGF-I gene expression during glucocorticoid excess because 50%E{uparrow}CHO maintained the level of IGF-I mRNA, whereas 50%E{uparrow}FAT decreased hepatic IGF-I mRNA by 40% during Dex treatment. From a clinical perspective, these data suggest that hypoenergetic PN may reduce the hepatic complications associated with PN and improve insulin metabolism. These results provide experimental evidence to support the American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on Parenteral Nutrition which suggests that "it is better to err on the side of giving too few than too many calories to patients, because it is likely that infectious and metabolic complications are increased by overfeeding" (4).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Baxter Healthcare for donating parenteral nutrition solutions and Michael Grahn, Elizabeth Dahly, and Angela Draxler for their expertise in animal care, tissue collection, and assays.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases Grants R01-DK-42835 and T32-DK-07665 and by funds from the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Back

3 Abbreviations used: AE, adequate energy; BW, body weight; CHO, carbohydrate; Dex, dexamethasone; 50%E, 50% of adequate energy; GH, growth hormone; IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor-I; PLSD, protected least significant difference; PN, parenteral nutrition; rh, recombinant human; RPA, RNase protection assay. Back

Manuscript received 10 August 2004. Initial review completed 20 October 2004. Revision accepted 23 November 2004.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Wilmore, D. W. (1991) Catabolic illness. Strategies for enhancing recovery. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:695-702.[Abstract]

2. Kritsch, K. R., Murali, S., Adamo, M. L. & Ney, D. M. (2002) Dexamethasone decreases serum and liver IGF-I and maintains liver IGF-I mRNA in parenterally fed rats. Am. J. Physiol. 282:R528-R536.

3. ASPEN Board of Directors (2002) Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 26:90SA-92SA.

4. Koretz, R. L., Lipman, T. O. & Klein, S. (2001) AGA technical review on parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 121:970-1001.[Medline]

5. Minet-Quinard, R., Moinard, C., Walrand, S., Villie, F., Normand, B., Vasson, M. P., Chopineau, J. & Cynober, L. (2000) Induction of a catabolic state in rats by dexamethasone: dose or time dependency?. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 24:30-36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Ohyama, T., Sato, M., Wada, Y. & Takahara, J. (1996) Diverse effects of glucocorticoids on the hypothalamic pituitary axis in rat growth hormone secretion. Endocr. J. 43(suppl.):S115-S117.

7. Yang, H., Grahn, M., Schalch, D. S. & Ney, D. M. (1994) Anabolic effect of IGF-I coinfused with total parenteral nutrition in dexamethasone-treated rats. Am. J. Physiol. 266:E690-E698.[Medline]

8. Hinton, P. S., Peterson, C. A., Lo, H. C., Yang, H., McCarthy, D. & Ney, D. M. (1995) Insulin-like growth factor-I enhances immune response in dexamethasone- treated or surgically stressed rats maintained with total parenteral nutrition. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 19:444-452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Singleton, J. R., Baker, B. L. & Thorburn, A. (2000) Dexamethasone inhibits insulin-like growth factor signaling and potentiates myoblast apoptosis. Endocrinology 141:2945-2950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Rizza, R. A., Mandarino, L. J. & Gerich, J. E. (1982) Cortisol-induced insulin resistance in man: impaired suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose utilization due to a postreceptor detect of insulin action. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 54:131-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Thissen, J. P., Underwood, L. E. & Ketelslegers, J. M. (1999) Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I in starvation and injury. Nutr. Rev. 57:167-176.[Medline]

12. Thissen, J. P., Ketelslegers, J. M. & Underwood, L. E. (1994) Nutritional regulation of the insulin-like growth factors. Endocr. Rev. 15:80-101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Burge, J. C., Goon, A., Choban, P. S. & Flancbaum, L. (1994) Efficacy of hypocaloric total parenteral nutrition in hospitalized obese patients: a prospective, double-blind randomized trial. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 18:203-207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Snyder, D. K., Clemmons, D. R. & Underwood, L. E. (1989) Dietary carbohydrate content determines responsiveness to growth hormone in energy-restricted humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 69:745-752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Tulikoura, I. & Huikuri, K. (1981) Changes in nitrogen metabolism in catabolic patients given three different parenteral nutrition regimens. Acta Chir. Scand. 147:519-524.[Medline]

16. Liu, S., Baracos, V. E., Quinney, H. A., Le Bricon, T. & Clandinin, M. T. (1995) Parallel insulin-like growth factor I and insulin resistance in muscles of rats fed a high fat diet. Endocrinology 136:3318-3324.[Abstract]

17. McCargar, L. J., Baracos, V. E. & Clandinin, M. T. (1989) Influence of dietary carbohydrate-to-fat ratio on whole body nitrogen retention and body composition in adult rats. J. Nutr. 119:1240-1245.

18. Macfie, J., Smith, R. C. & Hill, G. L. (1981) Glucose or fat as a nonprotein energy source? A controlled clinical trial in gastroenterological patients requiring intravenous nutrition. Gastroenterology 80:103-107.[Medline]

19. Isley, W. L., Underwood, L. E. & Clemmons, D. R. (1983) Dietary components that regulate serum somatomedin-C concentrations in humans. J. Clin. Investig. 71:175-182.

20. Miura, Y., Uchijima, Y., Takahashi, S.-I. & Noguchi, T. (1993) Effect of the quantity and nutritional quality of dietary proteins on the transcriptional activity of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-genes. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 57:358-359.

21. Straus, D. S. & Takemoto, C. D. (1990) Effect of dietary protein deprivation on insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and -II, IGF binding protein-2, and serum albumin gene expression in rat. Endocrinology 127:1849-1860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. VandeHaar, M. J., Moats-Staats, B. M., Davenport, M. L., Walker, J. L., Ketelslegers, J. M., Sharma, B. K. & Underwood, L. E. (1991) Reduced serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in protein-restricted growing rats are accompanied by reduced IGF-I mRNA levels in liver and skeletal muscle. J. Endocrinol. 130:305-312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Zhang, J., Chrysis, D. & Underwood, L. E. (1998) Reduction of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) during fasting is associated with diminished splicing of IGF-I pre-mRNA and decreased stability of cytoplasmic IGF-I mRNA. Endocrinology 139:4523-4530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Thissen, J. P. & Underwood, L. E. (1992) Translational status of the insulin-like growth factor-I mRNAs in liver of protein-restricted rats. J. Endocrinol. 132:141-147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Baker, D. H. (1984) Equalized versus ad libitum feeding. Nutr. Rev. 42:269-273.[Medline]

26. Reeves, P. G., Nielsen, F. H. & Fahey, G. C., Jr (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J. Nutr. 123:1939-1951.

27. Lasekan, J. B., Rivera, J., Hirvonen, M. D., Keesey, R. E. & Ney, D. M. (1992) Energy expenditure in rats maintained with intravenous or intragastric infusion of total parenteral nutrition solutions containing medium- or long-chain triglyceride emulsions. J. Nutr. 122:1483-1492.

28. Ott, L. (1988) An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis 3rd ed. 1988 PWS-Kent Publishing Boston, MA.

29. Kritsch, K. R. (2000) Regulation of the hepatic insulin-like growth factor-I system by nutrition and dexamethasone. Nutritional Sciences 2000:178 University of Wisconsin Madison. www.library.wisc.edu/databases/connect/dissertations.html [accessed 11/2/2004].

30. Tao, R. C., Yoshimura, N. N., Chinn, I. B. & Wolfe, A. M. (1979) Determination of intravenous non-protein energy and nitrogen requirements in growing rats. J. Nutr. 109:904-915.

31. Furlanetto, R. W., Underwood, L. E., Van Wyk, J. J. & D’Ercole, A. J. (1977) Estimation of somatomedin-C levels in normals and patients with pituitary disease by radioimmunoassay. J. Clin. Investig. 60:648-657.

32. Campbell, L. A. & Kronfeld, D. S. (1961) Estimation of low concentrations of plasma glucose using glucose oxidase. Am. J. Vet. Res. 22:587-589.

33. Shemer, J., Adamo, M. L., Roberts, C. T., Jr & LeRoith, D. (1992) Tissue-specific transcription start site usage in the leader exons of the rat insulin-like growth factor-I gene: evidence for differential regulation in the developing kidney. Endocrinology 131:2793-2799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Yakar, S., Liu, J. L., Stannard, B., Butler, A., Accili, D., Sauer, B. & LeRoith, D. (1999) Normal growth and development in the absence of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:7324-7329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Frankenfield, D., Smith, J. S. & Cooney, R. N. (2004) Validation of two approaches to predicting resting metabolic rate in critically ill patients. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 28:259-264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. McCowen, K. C. & Bistrian, B. R. (2004) Hyperglycemia and nutrition support: theory and practice. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 19:235-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Klein, C. J., Stanek, G. S. & Wiles, C. E., 3rd (1998) Overfeeding macronutrients to critically ill adults: metabolic complications. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 98:795-806.[Medline]

38. Girard, J., Ferre, P. & Foufelle, F. (1997) Mechanisms by which carbohydrates regulate expression of genes for glycolytic and lipogenic enzymes. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 17:325-352.[Medline]

39. Goya, L., de la Puente, A., Ramos, S., Martin, M. A., Escriva, F. & Pascual-Leone, A. M. (1999) Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I and -II by glucose in primary cultures of fetal rat hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:24633-24640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Straus, D. S. & Takemoto, C. D. (1991) Specific decrease in liver insulin-like growth factor-I and brain insulin-like growth factor-II gene expression in energy-restricted rats. J. Nutr. 121:1279-1286.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Zhang, Y. Feng, H. Yang, H. Koga, and D. H. Teitelbaum
The Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling Pathway Is Upregulated in a Mouse Model of Total Parenteral Nutrition
J. Nutr., July 1, 2009; 139(7): 1315 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kritsch, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ney, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kritsch, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ney, D. M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2005 by American Society for Nutrition