![]() |
|
|
MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
5To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cc{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: osteoporosis epidemiology growth programming
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, which predisposes to fracture (1). These fractures typically occur at the hip, the spine, and the wrist. It has been estimated that the remaining lifetime risk of fracture at one of these three sites at age 50 y is 50% among women and 20% among men. In the United Kingdom, the annual cost to the National Health Service of managing osteoporotic fractures is £1.7 billion, with about 80% of this figure attributable to hip fracture. The risk of osteoporotic fracture ultimately depends on two factors: the mechanical strength of bone and the forces applied to it. Bone mass (a composite measure, including contributions from bone size and from its volumetric mineral density) is an established determinant of bone strength, and the bone mass of an individual in later life depends upon the peak attained during skeletal growth and the subsequent rate of bone loss. Several longitudinal studies attest to the tracking of bone mass through childhood and adolescence, and mathematical models suggest that modifying peak bone mass will have biologically relevant effects on skeletal fragility in old age. There is evidence to suggest that peak bone mass is inherited, but current genetic markers are able to explain only a small proportion of the variation in individual bone mass or fracture risk (2).
Environmental influences during childhood and puberty have been shown to benefit bone-mineral accrual, but the relatively rapid rate of mineral gain during intrauterine and early postnatal life, coupled with the plasticity of skeletal development in utero, offer the possibility of profound interactions between the genome and the early environment at this stage in the life course. There is a strong biological basis for such a model of disease pathogenesis. Experimentalists have repeatedly demonstrated that minor alterations to the diet of pregnant animals can produce lasting changes in the body build, the physiology, and the metabolism of the offspring (3). This is one example of a ubiquitous phenomenon (phenotypic or developmental plasticity), which enables one genotype to give rise to a range of different physiological or morphological states in response to different prevailing environmental conditions during development. Its essence lies in the critical period during which a system is plastic and sensitive to the environment, followed by a loss of that plasticity and a fixed functional capacity. The evolutionary benefit of the phenomenon is that in a changing environment, it maximizes phenotypic diversity and enables the production of phenotypes that are better matched to their environment than would be possible with the production of the same phenotype in all environments. This review will address the role played by influences during intrauterine or early postnatal life in establishing the risk of osteoporosis in later years. In particular, the role of maternal vitamin D insufficiency as a risk factor for intrauterine and early postnatal bone mineral accrual will be discussed.
Developmental origins of osteoporosis and fracture
Epidemiological studies of coronary heart disease performed over a decade ago demonstrated strong geographic associations between death rate from the disorder in 19681978, and infant mortality in 19011910 (4). Subsequent research, based on individuals whose birth records had been preserved for seven decades, revealed that men and women who were undernourished during intrauterine life and therefore had low birthweight or were thin at birth, had an increased risk for coronary heart disease, hypertension, noninsulin dependent diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia (5). These associations are explained by a phenomenon known as programming (6); this term describes persisting changes in structure and function caused by environmental stimuli acting at critical periods during early development. It is not in question that the human skeleton can be programmed by undernutrition. Rickets has served as a long-standing example of undernutrition at a critical stage of early life, leading to persisting changes in structure. What is new is the realization that some of the bodys "memories" of early undernutrition become translated into pathology and thereby determine disease in later life (7). Evidence has now accumulated that such intrauterine programming contributes to the risk of osteoporosis in later life.
Evidence that the risk of osteoporosis might be modified by environmental influences during early life stems from three groups of studies: a) bone mineral measurements undertaken in cohorts of adults whose detailed birth and/or childhood records have been preserved; b) studies characterizing the nutrition, the body build, and the lifestyle of pregnant women and relating these to the bone mass of their newborn offspring; and c) studies relating childhood growth rates to the later risk of hip fracture.
Epidemiological studies
The first epidemiological evidence that osteoporosis risk might be programmed came from a study of 153 women born in Bath during 19681969 who were traced and studied at age 21 y (8). Data on childhood growth were obtained from linked birth and school health records. There were statistically significant (P < 0.05) associations between weight at 1 y and bone mineral content (BMC),6 but not density, at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck; these relationships were independent of adult weight and body mass index. The data suggested a discordance between the processes that govern skeletal growth and those that influence mineralization. They also provided direct evidence that the trajectory of bone growth might be modified in utero, an assertion previously only supported by inference from measurements of body height. The association between weight in infancy and adult bone mass was replicated in subsequent cohort studies of men and women ages 6075 y, who were born and still lived in Hertfordshire (911). These studies showed highly significant relationships between weight at 1 y and adult bone area at the spine and hip (P < 0.005); the relationships with BMC at these two sites were weaker but remained statistically significant (P < 0.02) (Fig. 1). They also remained after adjustment for known genetic markers of osteoporosis risk, such as polymorphisms in the gene for the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (12), and after adjustment for lifestyle characteristics in adulthood that might have influenced bone mass (physical activity, dietary calcium intake, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption). More detailed analyses of the interactions between polymorphism in the gene for the VDR (Bsm 1 polymorphism), birthweight, and bone mineral density (BMD) have recently been published from the same cohort study (13). In the cohort as a whole, there were no significant associations between either birthweight or VDR genotype and BMD. However, the relationship between lumbar spine BMD and VDR genotype varied according to birthweight (Fig. 2). Among individuals in the lowest third of birthweight, spine BMD was higher (P = 0.01) among individuals of genotype "BB" (the homozygous genotype generally associated with higher bone density) after adjustment for age, sex, and weight at baseline. In contrast, spine BMD was reduced (P = 0.04) in individuals of the same genotype who were in the highest third of the birthweight distribution. A statistically significant (P = 0.02) interaction was also found between VDR genotype and birthweight as determinants of BMD. These results suggest that genetic influences on adult bone size and mineral density may be modified by undernutrition in utero. Subsequent studies from the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia have replicated these relationships between weight in infancy and adult bone mass (Table 1). Finally, a recent twin study (14) evaluated the relationship between birthweight and bone mass among twins with a mean age of 47.5 y. Statistically significant relationships were found between the intrapair differences in birthweight and in BMC after adjustment for height and weight, even among monozygous twin pairs. These data suggest that even in genetically identical subjects, a relationship can be detected between birthweight and adult bone mass.
|
|
|
The second piece of epidemiological evidence that osteoporosis might arise, in part through developmental maladaptation, stems from investigation of a series of mothers through pregnancy; anthropometric and lifestyle maternal characteristics were related to the bone mineral of their newborn offspring (15). After adjusting for sex and gestational age, neonatal bone mass was strongly, positively associated with birthweight, birth length, and placental weight. Other determinants included maternal and paternal birthweight and maternal triceps skin-fold thickness at 28 wk (Fig. 3). Maternal smoking and maternal energy intake at 18 wk gestation were negatively associated with neonatal BMC at both the spine and the whole body (Fig. 4). The independent effects of maternal and paternal birthweight on fetal skeletal development support the notion that paternal influences, for example, through the imprinting of growth-promoting genes such as insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2), contribute strongly to the establishment of the early skeletal growth trajectory, while maternal nutrition and body build modify fetal nutrient supply and subsequent bone accretion, predominantly through influences on placentation.
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in maternal vitamin D and calcium metabolism occur during pregnancy to provide the calcium needed for fetal bone mineral accretion (17). Approximately 2530 g of calcium are transferred to the fetal skeleton by the end of pregnancy, most of which is transferred during the last trimester. It has been estimated that the fetus accumulates up to 250 mg calcium daily during the third trimester. Increased intestinal calcium absorption is the primary mechanism for obtaining extra calcium during this phase of pregnancy. Fractional calcium absorption increases from about 35% in the nonpregnant state to 60% during the third trimester. Serum concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increase about 50% over the nonpregnant state during the second trimester and by 100% during the third trimester.
Evidence that maternal vitamin D status influences neonatal calcium homeostasis arises principally from studies of immigrant mothers to the United Kingdom. Thus, parathyroid hormone concentrations among Asian mothers in the United Kingdom were inversely associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Reduced serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were reported in as many as 50% of women from ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. This finding has been replicated among healthy Swiss mothers and their term infants at delivery. Several randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy have also been conducted (Table 2). Although not all studies have been included in the table, those performed in larger numbers of subjects with adequate controls have generally demonstrated an elevation in maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and improvements in neonatal calcium homeostasis. Thus, a quasi-randomized trial of 1139 Scottish women attending different obstetric wards evaluated the response to 400 IU vitamin D daily from approximately the 12th week of gestation, compared with a placebo containing no vitamin D. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calcium, and phosphorous concentrations were measured at wk 24 and wk 34 of gestation, as well as in samples obtained from cord plasma and from the neonate on day 6. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were higher among the mothers who received vitamin D, compared with those who received placebo, at 24 wk, 34 wk, and delivery; as well as on day 6 for the infants (18).
|
Marya et al. (20) performed a randomized study of high-dose oral vitamin D in pregnancy. They randomized 120 women to receive either 600,000 IU vitamin D orally during the seventh and eighth months of their pregnancy or 1200 IU daily during the entire third trimester. A third group was randomized to no therapy. The mothers receiving high-dose therapy exhibited greater serum calcium and lower serum alkaline phosphatase concentrations compared with those not receiving vitamin D or those receiving 1200 IU daily. Similar findings have been observed in trials conducted in France (21,22).
In summary, observational studies and vitamin D supplementation trials among pregnant women at high risk of vitamin D deficiency have shown improved neonatal handling of calcium with improved maternal vitamin D status. What currently remains uncertain is the extent to which maternal vitamin D supplementation might also retard the frequency of osteopenia within the normal range of fetal growth and neonatal size.
Childhood growth and hip fracture
Most evidence relating the intrauterine environment to later osteoporosis stems from studies using noninvasive assessment of bone mineral. The clinically important consequence of reduced bone mass is fracture, and data are now available that directly link growth rates in childhood with the risk of later hip fracture (23). Studies of a unique Finnish cohort in whom birth and childhood growth data were linked to later hospital discharge records for hip fracture have permitted follow-up of around 7000 men and women who were born in Helsinki University Central Hospital from 19241933. Body size at birth was recorded, and about 10 measurements were obtained of height and weight throughout childhood. Hip-fracture incidence was assessed in this cohort using the Finnish hospital discharge registration system. After adjustment for age and sex, there were two major determinants of hip-fracture risk: tall maternal height (P < 0.001), and low rate of childhood growth (height, P = 0.006; weight, P = 0.01). The effects of maternal height and childhood growth rate were statistically independent of each other and remained after adjusting for socioeconomic status. More important, hip-fracture risk was also elevated (P = 0.05) among babies born short. These data are compatible with endocrine programming influencing the risk of hip fracture. In addition, the observation that fracture subjects were shorter at birth, but of average height by age 7 y, suggests that hip-fracture risk might be particularly elevated among children in whom growth of the skeletal envelope is forced ahead of the capacity to mineralize, a phenomenon that is accelerated during pubertal growth.
Developmental origins of osteoporosis
The observed relationship between osteoporosis risk and size at birth or during infancy does not imply a causal role of being born small but reflects the sensitivity of fetal growth to adverse intrauterine influences. The term "maternal constraint" encapsulates those environmental factors that influence birth size even in healthy pregnancies, for example, maternal size, age, parity, and multiple pregnancy. Among modifiable mechanisms limiting nutrient supply to the fetus, maternal nutrition has received the most attention, but other early environmental factors such as smoking, infectious exposure, and season of birth may have long-term effects.
Experimental evidence that the prenatal or the perinatal environment can influence adult postnatal physiology is available in several mammalian species (7,24). These studies demonstrate that manipulation of the periconceptual, embryonic, fetal, or neonatal environment can lead to altered postnatal cardiovascular and/or metabolic function. Although the environmental triggering cues are not yet fully understood, most manipulations have been dietary and include general maternal undernutrition (25,26), low-protein diet (27), or high-fat diet (28,29). Animal models for the developmental origins of osteoporosis replicate the observations made in humans. In the first such model, the feeding of a low-protein diet to pregnant rats produced offspring that exhibited a reduction in bone area and BMC, with altered growth plate morphology in adulthood (30). Maternal protein restriction also downregulated the proliferation and differentiation of bone-marrow stromal cells (31), as assessed by fibroblast colony formation at 4 and 8 wk.
There have been several models proposed to explain the changing demography of chronic diseases of affluence, such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exclusively genetic models (thrifty genotype) cannot explain the steep temporal trends and observed birth cohort effects on the incidence of osteoporotic fracture. The alternative thrifty phenotype model suggests that the fetus becomes growth retarded in response to adverse environmental conditions in utero, and the associated adaptations induce a phenotype better suited to a deprived postnatal food/energy environment. However, this model does not easily account for the graded effect on disease risk seen across the normal birthweight range, or the way in which the disparity between the prenatal and postnatal environment determines the level of risk.
These models have recently been brought together (7). Developmental responses to environmental stimuli need not provide immediate advantages but may alter the sensitivity of the organism to an anticipated future environment. Such predictive adaptive responses are made during the phase of developmental plasticity to optimize the phenotype for the probable environment of the mature organism, and epigenetic change is likely to be the mechanistic basis.
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Guest Editor Disclosure: Michael F. Holick, Academic Associate Nichols Institute; Christel Lamberg-Allardt, no relationships to disclose; Lisa A. Spence, Director of Nutrition Research for the National Dairy Council. ![]()
3 Author Disclosure: no relationships to disclose. ![]()
4 Supported by Medical Research Council; the Wellcome Trust, the Arthritis Research Campaign; the National Osteoporosis Society and the Cohen Trust. M. K. Javaid received an ARC Clinical Research Fellowship. ![]()
6 Abbreviations used: BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; VDR, vitamin D receptor. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Favus MJ eds. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 5th. ed. :307-13 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Washington, DC.
2. Ralston SH. Do genetic markers aid in risk assessment?. Osteoporosis Int. 1998;8:S37-S42.
3. Bateson P. Fetal experience and good adult disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:928-934.
4. Barker DJP. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1995;311:171-174.
5. Barker DJP. The fetal origins of adult disease. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995;262:37-43.[Medline]
6. Lucas A. Programming by early nutrition in man. Bock GR Whelan J eds. Programming by early nutrition in man. The childhood environment and adult disease. :38-55 John Wiley New York.
7. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development and patterns of disease. Science. 2004;305:1733-1736.
8. Cooper C, Cawley MID, Bhalla A, Egger P, Ring F, Morton L, Barker D. Childhood growth, physical activity and peak bone mass in women. J Bone Min Res. 1995;10:940-947.[Medline]
9. Cooper C, Fall C, Egger P, Hobbs R, Eastell R, Barker D. Growth in infancy and bone mass in later life. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:17-21.
10. Javaid MK, Cooper C. Prenatal and childhood influences on osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;16:349-367.[Medline]
11. Dennison EM, Syddall HE, Aihie Sayer A, Gilbody JJ, Cooper C. Birth weight and weight at one year are independent determinants of bone mass in the seventh decade: the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Paediatr Res. 2005;57:582-586.[Medline]
12. Keen R, Egger P, Fall C, Major P, Lanchbury J, Spector TD, Cooper C. Polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor, infant growth and adult bone mass. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;60:233-235.[Medline]
13. Dennison EM, Arden NK, Keen RW, Syddall H, Day INM, Spector TD, Cooper C. Birthweight, vitamin D receptor genotype and the programming of osteoporosis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:211-219.[Medline]
14. Antoniades L, MacGregor AJ, Andrew T, Spector TD. Association of birthweight with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in adult twins. Rheumatology. 2003;42:791-796.
15. Godfrey K, Walker-Bone K, Robinson S, Taylor P, Shore S, Wheeler T, Cooper C. Neonatal bone mass: influence of parental birthweight, maternal smoking, body composition, and activity during pregnancy. J Bone Min Res. 2001;16:1694-1703.[Medline]
16. Harvey NCW, Javaid MK, Taylor P, Crozier SR, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Umbilical cord calcium and maternal vitamin D status predict different lumbar spine bone parameters in the offspring at 9 years. [abstract]J Bone Min Res. 2004;19:1032.
17. Specker BL. Vitamin D requirements during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(Suppl):1740S-1747S.
18. Cockburn F, Belton NR, Purvis RJ, et al. Maternal vitamin D intake and mineral metabolism in mothers and their newborn infants. Br Med J. 1980;231:1-10.
19. Brooke DG, Brown IRF, Bone CDM, Carter ND, Cleeve HJW, Maxwell JD, Robinson VP, Winder SM. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. Br Med J. 1980;280:751-754.
20. Marya RK, Rathee S, Lata V, Mudgil S. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1981;12:155-161.[Medline]
21. Delvin EE, Salle BL, Glorieux FH, Adeleine P, David LS. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: effect on neonatal calcium homeostasis. J Pediatr. 1986;109:328-334.[Medline]
22. Mallet E, Gugi B, Brunelle P, Henocq A, Basuyau JP, Lemeur H. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a controlled trial of two methods. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:300-304.[Medline]
23. Cooper C, Eriksson JG, Forsén T, Osmond C, Tuomilehto J, Barker DJP. Maternal height, childhood growth and risk of hip fracture in later life: a longitudinal study. Osteoporosis Int. 2001;12:623-629.[Medline]
24. Bertram CE, Hanson MA. Animal models and programming of the metabolic syndrome. Br Med Bull. 2001;60:103-121.
25. Vickers MH, Breier BH, Cutfield WS, Hofman PL, Gluckman PD. Fetal origins of hyperphagia, obesity, and hypertension and postnatal amplification by hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;279:E83-E87.
26. Kind KL, Roberts CT, Sohlstrom AI, Katsman A, Clifton PM, Robinson JS, Owens JA. Chronic maternal feed restriction impairs growth but increases adiposity of the fetal guinea pig. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Physiol. 2005;288:R119-R126.
27. Langley-Evans S, Gardner DS, Jackson AA. Maternal protein restriction influences the programming of the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Nutr. 1996;126:1578-1585.
28. Plagemann A, Harder T, Rake A, Voits M, Fink H, Rohde W, Dörner G. Perinatal elevation of hypothalamic insulin, acquired malformation of hypothalamic galaninergic neurons, and syndrome x-like alterations in adulthood of neonatally overfed rats. Brain Res. 1999;836:146-155.[Medline]
29. Khan IY, Taylor PD, Dekou V, Seed PT, Lakasing L, Graham D, Dominiczak AF, Hanson MA, Poston L. Gender-linked hypertension in offspring of lard-fed pregnant rats. Hypertension. 2003;41:168-175.
30. Mehta G, Roach HI, Langley-Evans S, Taylor P, Reading I, Oreffo ROC, Aihie-Sayer A, Clarke NMP, Cooper C. Intrauterine exposure to a maternal low protein diet reduces adult bone mass and alters growth plate morphology in rats. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71:493-498.[Medline]
31. Oreffo ROC, Lashbrooke B, Roach HI, Clarke NMP, Cooper C. Maternal protein deficiency affects mesenchymal stem cell activity in the developing offspring. Bone. 2003;33:100-107.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Kovacs Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 520S - 528S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Alpert and U. Shaikh The Effects of Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency on the Endocrine and Paracrine Systems Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2007; 9(2): 117 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. W. Kin, W. S. Y. Shan, L. J. C. Shun, L. P. Chung, and W. Jean Experience of famine and bone health in post-menopausal women Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Holick Vitamin D Deficiency N. Engl. J. Med., July 19, 2007; 357(3): 266 - 281. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-M. Alexe, G. Syridou, and E. Th. Petridou Determinants of Early Life Leptin Levels and Later Life Degenerative Outcomes Clin. Med. Res., December 1, 2006; 4(4): 326 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Chan, K. McElligott, T. McNaught, and G. Gill Effects of dietary calcium intervention on adolescent mothers and newborns: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2006; 108(3): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||