![]() |
|
|
Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore and * University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cofkwp{at}nus.edu.sg.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: cigarette smoking nutrient intakes physical activities Chinese
Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for multiple potentially fatal health outcomes, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, as well as cancers at various sites (1). Cigarette smoke contains a large number of oxidants and free radicals that contribute directly to carcinogenesis and atherogenesis; cigarette smoking accounts for an estimated 30% of all cancers and 20% of total deaths in developed countries (1,2). Studies in Western populations showed that smokers tend to have unhealthy food intake patterns, including consuming fewer fresh fruits and vegetables; therefore, they have lower intakes of nutrients such as vitamin C, fiber, folate, and carotenoids, which are believed to possess cancer-preventive and cardioprotective properties. Smokers also consume more alcohol and are more sedentary than those who never smoked (37). These undesirable dietary intake and lifestyle patterns may further enhance their risk of developing cardiovascular diseases and cancers. From a methodological viewpoint in epidemiology, these dietary differences across individuals with differing smoking status complicate the interpretation of any observed dietary effects on tobacco-related diseases.
Although the association between unhealthy dietary intakes and smoking seems to exist across populations in Western countries, there is a paucity of information from non-Western populations (8). One study involving 1010 Chinese men and women in Hong Kong reported that smokers did not vary in their dietary habits relative to those who never smoked (9). Because of the methodological limitations of that Chinese study, including the small number of female smokers (n = 19), the suboptimal statistical power to detect significant difference among male participants (68%), and possible missing food composition information as stated by the authors, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of these null results.
The present study examined the relations between lifestyle patterns, including diet and smoking status (never, former, and current), among participants of the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a population-based prospective cohort investigation of 63,000 Chinese men and women in Singapore.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
85% of eligible subjects who were invited responded positively. At recruitment, a face-to-face interview was conducted in the subjects home by a trained interviewer using a structured, scanner-readable questionnaire, which requested information on demographics, lifetime use of tobacco, usual physical activity, menstrual and reproductive history (women only), medical history and family history of cancer. The questionnaire also included a dietary component assessing current intake patterns, which were subsequently validated against a series of 24-h diet recalls (10). The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Southern California and the National University of Singapore approved this study.
The study population was divided into never-, former, and current smokers based on their choice of 3 possible responses to the following question, "Have you ever smoked at least 1 cigarette a day for 1 y or longer?" Subjects who answered "no" were classified as "never-smokers," those who answered "yes, but I quit smoking" were classified as "former smokers," and those answered "yes, and I currently smoke" were classified as "current smokers." There were 6 predefined categories of average number of cigarettes smoked/d:
6 cigarettes, 712 cigarettes, 1322 cigarettes, 2332 cigarettes, 3342 cigarettes, and
43 cigarettes. The number of years of active smoking was categorized as:
9 y, 1019 y, 2029 y, 3039 y, and
40 y, whereas the number of years since quitting smoking for former smokers was categorized as: <1 y, 12 y, 34 y, 59 y, 1014 y, 1519 y, and
20 y.
Baseline questionnaire. The development and validation of the baseline FFQ were described earlier (10). At recruitment, information on usual diet over the past 12 mo was obtained via this semiquantitative FFQ, which was administered in person at the subjects home. The questionnaire listed 165 food and beverage items, and the respondent was asked to select from 8 food frequency categories (ranging from "never or hardly ever" to "2 or more times a day") and 3 portion sizes with accompanying photographs.
For the assessment of physical activity, subjects were asked to estimate the number of hours spent watching TV each day, and the numbers of hours each week spent on moderate activities such as brisk walking, bowling, bicycling on level ground, tai chi, or chi kung, and on strenuous sports such as jogging, bicycling on hills, tennis, squash, swimming laps, or aerobics.
Statistical analysis. For each subject, we computed the mean daily intakes of roughly 100 nutritive and nonnutritive compounds by combining information obtained from the baseline interview with nutrient values provided in the Singapore Food Composition Table (10). All nutrients were expressed as weight per 1000 kJ or % energy to adjust for total energy intake.
Study subjects were classified according to demographic and other lifestyle variables by smoking status.
2 statistics were used to examine the association between demographic/lifestyle factors and smoking status. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to calculate the means of dietary nutrients and energy intake by various smoking categories after adjustment for age (continuous), BMI (continuous), education (no formal education, primary school, secondary school or higher), and dialect group (Cantonese or Hokkien). All analyses were performed separately for men and women. Due to the large study sample size, virtually all statistical comparisons reached the conventional level of significance (i.e., 2-sided P < 0.05). We proposed that an examination of the magnitude (in percentages) of the difference in diet between current, heavy smokers, and those who never smoked represents a more meaningful assessment of the potential association between diet and smoking. Statistical analysis was carried out using the SAS software version 8.2 (SAS Institute).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings are consistent with those obtained in Western populations, including the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia, which showed that those who never smoked in general have healthier dietary and lifestyle patterns compared with smokers (3,4,7,8,1317). Because the Chinese culture is distinct from that in the West, our findings suggest that the diet-smoking association noted in diverse populations is not a culturally based phenomenon. The pertinent question is why smokers across all cultures eat differently from those who do not smoke. A possible explanation is that smokers are generally of a lower educational and income background than never-smokers, and are therefore less informed about healthy food choices or are unable to afford them (18,19). Our study does not support this explanation; all smoking-diet associations persisted after adjustment for level of education. Another possible explanation is that smokers are less health conscious than those who never smoked. Again, one would have to assume that this is a culture-free sentiment because we noted similar diet-smoking associations in this Chinese population whose culture and religious beliefs are distinct from their Western counterparts. In support of this hypothesis, our data also showed that another health-related behavior, physical activity, was much lower among smokers (Table 4).
Another possible explanation for the persistent difference in diet between smokers and never-smokers across diverse cultures and educational backgrounds is that there is a biological basis for this phenomenon. Studies showed that nicotine and other chemicals in cigarettes may affect food choices indirectly by altering the physiological processes relating to smell, taste, or appetite (20,21). Smokers have reported a decreased liking for sweet taste after smoking, and this may explain why smokers generally find sweet foods such as fruits and fruit juices less palatable than dried or processed foods (22). Those who stop smoking resume eating more fruits and vegetables (13,23), and it is possible that this is due to a physiologically based improvement in the senses of smell and taste. This notion, if confirmed, has implications in the design and implementation of an effective tobacco control program regardless of the culture and ethnicity of the target population.
Cigarette smoke contains many oxidants and free radicals, which can increase lipid peroxidation and induce oxidative damage to DNA (24,25). Smokers are therefore subjected to increased oxidative stress relative to nonsmokers. In other words, smokers actually require more antioxidants than those who never smoked to counter their heightened level of oxidative stress; an example of this is the higher recommended daily intake of vitamin C in the United States for smokers compared with that for nonsmokers (26). In our study, current smokers had dose-dependent decreases in intakes of fruits and fruit juices compared with those who never smoked; the difference between the current heavy smokers and those who never smoked was 33% in men and 37% in women (data not shown). The same pattern of differences was also seen in the consumption of all types of vegetables. It is possible that both taste aversion for fruits and vegetables and a poor attitude toward healthy living may act together to account for unhealthy dietary choices among smokers. If this is indeed the case, in addition to public education programs that aim to encourage consumption of fruit and vegetables, dietary supplements, or an attempt to remedy the altered taste response to foods through pharmacological means, may represent other options that could be effective in smokers. Finally, this study emphasizes the need to consider residual confounding effects when studying diet-disease associations in tobacco-related diseases.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Manuscript received 9 May 2005. Initial review completed 15 June 2005. Revision accepted 12 July 2005.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK. Cigarette smoking: an epidemiological overview. Br Med Bull. 1996;52:3-11.
2. Stewart BW, Kleihues PE. Cigarette smoking: an epidemiological overview. World Cancer Report. IARC Press Lyon.
3. Marangon K, Herbeth B, Lecomte E, Paul-Dauphin A, Grolier P, Chancerelle Y, Artur Y, Siest G. Diet, antioxidant status, and smoking habits in French men. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:231-239.[Abstract]
4. Thornton A, Lee P, Fry J. Differences between smokers, ex-smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(10):1143-1162.[Medline]
5. Brasche S, Winkler G, Heinrich J. Dietary intake and smokingresults from a dietary survey in Erfurt in 1991/92. Z Ernahrungswiss. 1998;37:211-214.[Medline]
6. Palaniappan U, Jacobs Starkey L, OLoughlin J, Gray-Donald K. Fruit and vegetable consumption is lower and saturated fat intake is higher among Canadians reporting smoking. J Nutr. 2001;131:1952-1958.
7. Ma J, Betts NM, Hampl JS. Clustering of lifestyle behaviors: the relationship between cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary intake. Am J Health Promot. 2000;15:107-117.[Medline]
8. Dallongeville J, Marecaux N, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P. Cigarette smoking is associated with unhealthy patterns of nutrient intake: a meta-analysis. J Nutr. 1998;128:1450-1457.
9. Woo J, Ho SC, Sham A, Leung SS, Lam TH, Janus ED. Dietary habit of smokers in a Chinese population. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2001;52:477-484.[Medline]
10. Hankin JH, Stram DO, Arakawa K, Park S, Low SH, Lee HP, Yu MC. Singapore Chinese Health Study: development, validation, and calibration of the quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Nutr Cancer. 2001;39:187-195.[Medline]
11. Research and Evaluation Department, Ministry of Health. Singapore Chinese Health Study: development, validation, and calibration of the quantitative food frequency questionnaire. National health survey 1992: highlights of main survey findings. Singapore Singapore.
12. Department of Statistics. Singapore Chinese Health Study: development, validation, and calibration of the quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Singapore census of population 1990: literacy, languages spoken and education. Singapore.
13. Morabia A, Wynder EL. Dietary habits of smokers, people who never smoked, and exsmokers. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52:933-937.
14. McPhillips JB, Eaton CB, Gans KM, Derby CA, Lasater TM, McKenney JL, Carleton RA. Dietary differences in smokers and nonsmokers from two southeastern New England communities. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:287-292.[Medline]
15. Nuttens MC, Romon M, Ruidavets JB, Arveiler D, Ducimetiere P, Lecerf JM, Richard JL, Cambou JP, Simon C, Salomez JL. Relationship between smoking and diet: the MONICA-France project. J Intern Med. 1992;231:349-356.[Medline]
16. Hebert JR, Kabat GC. Differences in dietary intake associated with smoking status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990;44:185-193.[Medline]
17. Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Brown CA, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Nutrient intake by duration of ex-smoking in the Scottish Heart Health Study. Br J Nutr. 1993;69:315-332.[Medline]
18. Ma J, Hampl JS, Betts NM. Antioxidant intakes and smoking status: data from the continuing survey of food intakes by individuals 19941996. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:774-780.
19. Woodward M, Bolton-Smith C, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Deficient health knowledge, diet, and other lifestyles in smokers: is a multifactorial approach required?. Prev Med. 1994;23:354-361.[Medline]
20. Perkins KA, Epstein LH, Stiller RL, Fernstrom MH, Sexton JE, Jacob RG. Perception and hedonics of sweet and fat taste in smokers and nonsmokers following nicotine intake. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990;35:671-676.[Medline]
21. Grunberg NE. The effects of nicotine and cigarette smoking on food consumption and taste preferences. Addict Behav. 1982;7:317-331.[Medline]
22. Redington K. Taste differences between cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984;21:203-208.[Medline]
23. Whichelow MJ, Erzinclioglu SW, Cox BD. A comparison of the diets of non-smokers and smokers. Br J Addict. 1991;86:71-81.[Medline]
24. Pryor WA. Cigarette smoke radicals and the role of free radicals in chemical carcinogenicity. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105(Suppl 4):875-882.
25. Frei B, Forte TM, Ames BN, Cross CE. Gas phase oxidants of cigarette smoke induce lipid peroxidation and changes in lipoprotein properties in human blood plasma. Protective effects of ascorbic acid. Biochem J. 1991;277:133-181.
26. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Gas phase oxidants of cigarette smoke induce lipid peroxidation and changes in lipoprotein properties in human blood plasma. Protective effects of ascorbic acid. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids: a report of the Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds, Subcommittees on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients and of Interpretation and Use of Dietary Reference Intakes, and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. National Academies Press Washington DC.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-M. Yuan, W.-P. Koh, S. E. Murphy, Y. Fan, R. Wang, S. G. Carmella, S. Han, K. Wickham, Y.-T. Gao, M. C. Yu, et al. Urinary Levels of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamine Metabolites in Relation to Lung Cancer Development in Two Prospective Cohorts of Cigarette Smokers Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 69(7): 2990 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O Odegaard, M. A Pereira, W.-P. Koh, K. Arakawa, H.-P. Lee, and M. C Yu Coffee, tea, and incident type 2 diabetes: the Singapore Chinese Health Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Kabagambe, A. Baylin, and H. Campos Nonfatal Acute Myocardial Infarction in Costa Rica: Modifiable Risk Factors, Population-Attributable Risks, and Adherence to Dietary Guidelines Circulation, March 6, 2007; 115(9): 1075 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Nagle, C. J. Bain, and P. M. Webb Cigarette Smoking and Survival after Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2557 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||