Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaina, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaina, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G.
© 2005 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 135:5-8, January 2005


Recent Advances in Nutritional Sciences

Nutrition and Aberrant DNA Methylation Patterns in Atherosclerosis: More than Just Hyperhomocysteinemia?1,2

Silvio Zaina3, Marie Wickström Lindholm* and Gertrud Lund{dagger}

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; * Experimental Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Lund University, UMAS, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden; and {dagger} Institute of Plant Biology, Department of Plant Biochemistry, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Silvio.Zaina{at}rh.dk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Methylation is a reversible modification of DNA participating in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. It is now clear that atherosclerosis is associated with aberrant DNA methylation patterns in the vascular tissue and peripheral blood cells, but the origin of this anomaly is poorly understood. Based on evidence that global DNA hypomethylation coexists with hyperhomocysteinemia in advanced human atherosclerosis, it is widely assumed that altered DNA methylation patterns in atherosclerosis are mainly secondary to a decrease in factors essential for the synthesis of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM, the main methyl group donor in DNA methylation reactions), such as folate and vitamin B-12, or to homocysteine-induced blocking of SAM biosynthesis. Nonetheless, recent work expanded this view by showing that both local DNA hyper- and hypomethylation occur in early atherosclerosis in normohomocysteinemic mice and that atherogenic lipoprotein profiles promote DNA hypermethylation in cultured human macrophages. These findings suggest that during early atherosclerosis, nutritional factors affect DNA methylation patterns by mechanisms that are likely to be independent of vitamin or homocysteine levels. These data have the potential to assist in the identification of preventive or therapeutic avenues for cardiovascular disease.


KEY WORDS: • DNA methylation • homocysteine • atherosclerosis

Gene expression can be regulated at a genetic level by changes in DNA sequence and at an epigenetic level by mechanisms that are mutation independent. Epigenetic control of gene expression involves modifications of chromatin such as DNA methylation and several types of histone post-translational modifications such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. Generally, conformationally relaxed chromatin (euchromatin) is a hallmark of potentially active genic regions and is associated with hypomethylated DNA and acetylated histones, whereas compact chromatin (heterochromatin) DNA is transcriptionally silent, hypermethylated, and bound to nonacetylated histones (1). Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation are crucial determinants of cellular behavior. For example, DNA methylation patterns are more or less stably inherited upon mitosis in adult cells, but deviations from normal DNA methylation patterns are associated with diseases such as cancer and atherosclerosis (24). The epigenetics of disease has been investigated intensely in recent years, particularly in cancer, because aberrant DNA methylation profiles are associated with advanced stages of disease and may represent markers of predisposition (5). Generally, tumor cells show two concomitant opposing changes in DNA methylation. As a whole, the genome is hypomethylated but selected CpG island-rich 5' regions of genes become densely hypermethylated (6). CpG island hypermethylation has been linked to tumor suppressor gene silencing, whereas DNA hypomethylation may cause oncogenic mutations by promoting chromosomal instability. Furthermore, because DNA methylation and histone acetylation are in principle reversible modifications, they have recently emerged as promising molecular targets in cancer therapy (79).

In contrast to cancer research, the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the context of atherosclerosis has been the subject of relatively little experimental investigation. Although the effects of hypercholesterolemia on chromatin structure had been documented by the early 1980s (10), the hypothesis that aberrant DNA methylation patterns drive atherogenesis was first formulated by P. E. Newman in the late 1990s (11). The author’s reasoning was that homocysteine effectively inhibits the folate- and vitamin B-12–dependent cycle converting methionine to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM),4 the main methyl group donor in DNA methylation reactions, and that hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent atherosclerosis risk factor (12). Therefore, abnormally low circulating levels of vitamin B-12 and folic acid were predicted to cause an accumulation of homocysteine, a parallel reduction in SAM, and consequently an insufficient DNA methylation capacity. Hypomethylated DNA would then be prone to mutations or aberrant gene expression patterns leading to the transition from a normal cellular phenotype to one that favors the development of vascular fibrocellular lesions (11). Subsequent experimental work consistently confirmed at least part of that predicted scenario (Table 1). In these studies, DNA methylation was assessed by methods that can reveal the net DNA methylation status (e.g., direct quantitation of methylcytosine residues or radioactive labeling of ends generated by methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes) but do not allow measurement of the extent of both de novo hyper- and hypomethylation. Global DNA hypomethylation at levels similar to those found in some cancer types was demonstrated in human, rabbit, and murine advanced atherosclerosis, in both vascular tissue and peripheral blood cells (1315). In at least one study, circulating homocysteine levels were significantly correlated with the extent of DNA methyl-group loss in advanced atherosclerosis (15). Another study demonstrated DNA hypomethylation and hyperhomocysteinemia in peripheral blood cells from patients affected by end-stage renal disease, a condition associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease (16). Furthermore, the latter work showed that folate dietary supplement restores normal DNA methylation levels (16). These results in humans were mirrored by the phenotype of mutant mice lacking methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), an essential enzyme in the pathways regenerating SAM. MTHFR-null mutants show concomitant hyperhomocysteinemia, DNA hypomethylation, and aortic lipid deposits, possibly resembling fatty streaks that are observed in early atherosclerosis (17).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Synopsis of studies documenting changes in DNA methylation at the level of the whole genome or individual genes

 
The above data are consistent with the view that hyperhomocysteinemia-induced DNA hypomethylation is an important driving force in atherogenesis, implying that folate administration is a sensible therapeutic avenue to counteract DNA hypomethylation, if not hyperhomocysteinemia per se (18,19). However, recently published work expanded this model by suggesting that aberrant DNA methylation patterns in atherosclerosis are likely to have more complex causes than simply hyperhomocysteinemia (20). The authors analyzed hyperlipidemic, atherosclerosis-prone apolipoprotein E (apoE)-null mutant and control wild-type mice at the early stages of the disease (at 4 wk of age, when hyperlipidemia is already established but no histological sign of aortic lesions is detectable) and in the presence of relatively advanced fibrocellular lesions (at the age of 6 mo). A methylation-sensitive DNA fingerprinting technique was used, allowing measurement of the relative contribution of hyper- and hypomethylation to the net genome-wide DNA methylation profile. The study demonstrated both DNA hyper- and hypomethylation, with a slight but significant excess of the latter, in aortae of 4-wk old apoE-null mice. The same pattern, but with a larger excess of hypomethylated sites, was present in the aortae of affected 6-mo-old mutant mice. The peripheral blood cell DNA of apoE-null mice showed aberrant DNA hypo- and hypermethylation in both age groups, but significant excess hypomethylation was observed only in 6-mo-old mice. Furthermore, DNA methylation patterns were within the expected tissue-to-tissue variation in all control tissues examined. These results show that the initial stages of atherogenesis are associated with a rearrangement of genomic DNA methylation patterns including both hyper- and hypomethylation, rather than a unidirectional change toward global hypomethylation. The authors went further, elucidating mechanisms underlying aberrant DNA methylation patterns in early atherosclerosis, by stimulating the human macrophage THP-1 cell line with lipoprotein mixes reproducing lipoprotein ratios of ApoE-null mice (high VLDL+LDL to HDL ratio) or wild type mice (low VLDL+LDL to HDL ratio). A relatively short stimulation with this atherogenic lipid profile induced a significant DNA hypermethylation compared with untreated cells or cells incubated with a lipoprotein mix reproducing the VLDL+LDL to HDL ratio of wild-type control mice (20).

The implications of the latter study may be manyfold. First, it suggests that DNA hypermethylation is one of the early molecular "hits" in atherogenesis. Although only a very limited number of individual genes have been screened for DNA methylation aberrations in atherosclerosis to date, these findings are consistent with the observation that DNA hypermethylation at the human estrogen receptor gene is associated with atherosclerosis and, noticeably, with aging, a cardiovascular disease-predisposing factor (21). Second, lipids or lipoprotein components are likely candidate factors behind such changes. We anticipate that further studies will uncover additional atherogenic dietary factors that can modify DNA methylation and chromatin structure, including lipids, lipoprotein constituents, as well as other yet unidentified molecules, thus opening new perspectives to the prevention of atherosclerosis by the use of commonly available dietary constituents (22). Third, if these findings have any relevance to human atherosclerosis, it can be concluded that efforts to counteract DNA hypomethylation by folate supplementation or other strategies aimed at compensating the effects of hyperhomocysteinemia should be considered with caution because they may favor SAM overproduction and DNA hypermethylation at early stages of atherosclerosis, with potential proatherogenic consequences. Interestingly, a similar dilemma poses itself in cancer therapy because ongoing experimentations with DNA hypomethylation-promoting drugs, although based on sound molecular evidence, contrast with the oncogenic effects of loss of DNA methyltransferase activity in animal models (23,24). Important clues to this issue are bound to come from extensive clinical trials assessing the effect of vitamin supplements on the development of cardiovascular disease (25). Published studies in apoE-null mice suggest that vitamin supplements confer a homocysteine-independent protection, although the normocysteinemic status of this animal model complicates the extrapolation of the data to humans (26). Fourth, the data provide insights into causal relations between hyperhomocysteinemia and DNA hypomethylation. The latter could not be a consequence of homocysteine imbalance because apoE-null mice are not hyperhomocysteinemic (27). One alternative possibility is that DNA hypomethylation occurs passively as a consequence of defective maintenance of DNA methylation patterns in proliferating cells (28). Although this cannot be excluded in the case of intensely proliferating fibrocellular lesions, it is an unsatisfactory explanation for the preatherosclerotic aortae of apoE-null mice, in which the authors of the present review failed to detect any abnormal cell proliferation. Rather, the data discussed to date suggest that DNA hypomethylation in early atherosclerosis is mechanistically unrelated to the homocysteine-folate system and, in close similarity to the concomitant DNA hypermethylation, is the result of chromatin-modifying dietary or endogenous factors.

In light of the above data, what is the relevance of DNA hypomethylation in advanced atherosclerosis? We propose that the bulk of DNA hypomethylation detected in aortic advanced fibrocellular plaques is a passive phenomenon due to loss of methyl groups in highly proliferating smooth muscle cells (SMC), similar to the observed hypomethylated status of injury-induced neointimal tissue DNA (14). Furthermore, DNA hypomethylation in peripheral blood cells may reflect hyperproliferation of cell types involved in immune or inflammatory responses during atherosclerosis (29,30). This does not exclude the possibility that homocysteine may cause DNA hypomethylation indirectly through promoting SMC proliferation or activation of immune responses, thus explaining the observed correlations between homocysteine levels and the degree of DNA hypomethylation (31,32). Accordingly, Yi et al. (33) did not detect any significant correlation between plasma homocysteine and plasma SAM levels, or between the latter and the extent of peripheral blood cell DNA hypomethylation, thus giving weight to the view that homocysteine excess does not necessarily result in limiting methyl group donor levels.

In conclusion, recent findings suggest that early atherogenesis is associated with rearrangements of DNA methylation patterns involving both hypo- and hypermethylation and that nutritional factors are likely to play a central role in these alterations (Fig. 1). In advanced phases of the disease, cell hyperproliferation results in a predominant DNA hypomethylation. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the significance of hyperhomocysteinemia as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease are probably not explained by a direct effect on DNA methylation, but rather are to be ascribed to at least some of the many known cellular functions of homocysteine (31).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Schematic representation of atherosclerosis progression from a normal blood vessel (left) to the development of a fatty streak and an elevated fibrocellular lesion (far right). The DNA methylation status of vascular cells is indicated for stages of the disease at which it was studied.

 


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Angelo Santino for discussions on nutritional factors and disease.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Danish Research Council, Danish Heart Foundation (Hjerteforeningen), Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Lundbeck Foundation. Back

2 Manuscript received 15 September 2004. Back

4 Abbreviations used: apoE, apolipoprotein E; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; SAM, S-adenosyl methionine; SMC, smooth muscle cells. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 33:245-253.

2. Esteller, M. & Herman, J. G. (2002) Cancer as an epigenetic disease: DNA methylation and chromatin alterations in human tumours. J. Pathol. 196:1-7.[Medline]

3. Dong, C., Yoon, W. & Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J. (2002) DNA methylation and atherosclerosis. J. Nutr. 132:2406S-2409S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Hiltunen, M. O. & Ylä-Herttuala, S. (2003) DNA methylation, smooth muscle cells, and atherogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23:1750-1753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Tycko, B. (2003) Genetic and epigenetic mosaicism in cancer precursor tissues. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 983:43-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Feinberg, A. P. & Tycko, B. (2004) The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4:143-153.[Medline]

7. Laird, P. W. (2003) The power and the promises of DNA methylation markers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:253-266.[Medline]

8. Yao, X., Hu, J. F., Daniels, M., Shiran, H., Zhou, X., Yan, H., Lu, H., Zeng, Z. & Wang, Q., et al (2003) A methylated oligonucleotide inhibits IGF2 expression and enhances survival in a model of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 111:265-273.[Medline]

9. Chen, J. S., Faller, D. V. & Spanjaard, R. A. (2003) Short-chain fatty acid inhibitors of histone deacetylases: promising anticancer therapeutics?. Curr. Cancer Drug Targ. 3:219-236.

10. Lehmann, R., Denes, R., Nienhaus, R., Steinbach, T., Lusztig, G. & Sanatger, R. M. (1980) Alteration of chromatin in early experimental arteriosclerosis. Artery 8:288-293.[Medline]

11. Newman, P. E. (1999) Can reduced folic acid and vitamin B12 levels cause deficient DNA methylation producing mutations which initiate atherosclerosis?. Med. Hypotheses 53:421-424.[Medline]

12. Taylor, L. M., Jr (2003) Elevated plasma homocysteine as risk factor for peripheral arterial disease—what is the evidence?. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 16:215-222.[Medline]

13. Laukkanen, M. O., Mannermaa, S., Hiltunen, M. O., Aittomäki, S., Airenne, K., Jänne, J. & Ylä-Herttuala, S. (1999) Local hypomethylation in atherosclerosis found in rabbit ec-sod gene. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19:2171-2178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Hiltunen, M. O., Turunen, M. P., Häkkinen, T. P., Rutanen, J., Hedman, M., Mäkinen, K., Turunen, A. M., Aalto-Setälä, K. & Ylä-Herttuala, S. (2002) DNA hypomethylation and methyltransferase expression in atherosclerotic lesions. Vasc. Med. 7:5-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Castro, R., Rivera, I., Struys, E. A., Jansen, E.E.W., Ravasco, P., Camilo, M. E., Blom, H. J., Jakobs, C. & Tavares de Almeida, I. (2003) Increased homocysteine and S-adenosylhomocysteine concentrations and DNA hypomethylation in vascular disease. Clin. Chem. 49:1292-1296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Ingrosso, D., Cimmino, A., Perna, A. F., Masella, L., De Santo, N. G., De Bonis, M. L., Vacca, M., D’Esposito, M., D’Urso, M., Galletti, P. & Zappia, V. (2003) Folate treatment and unbalanced methylation and changes of allelic expression induced by hyperhomocysteinaemia in patients with uraemia. Lancet 361:1693-1699.[Medline]

17. Chen, Z., Karaplis, A. C., Ackerman, S. L., Pogribny, I. P., Melnyk, S., Lussier-Cacan, S., Chen, M. F., Pai, A. & John, S.W.M., et al (2001) Mice deficient in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase exhibit hyperhomocysteinemia and decreased methylation capacity, with neuropathology and aortic lipid deposition. Hum. Mol. Gen. 10:433-443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. van Guldener, C. & Stehouwer, C.D.A. (2003) Hyperhomocysteinaemia and vascular disease—a role for DNA hypomethylation?. Lancet 361:1668-1669.[Medline]

19. Faraci, F. M. & Lentz, S. R. (2004) Hyperhomocysteinemia, oxidative stress, and cerebral vascular dysfunction. Stroke 35:345-347.[Free Full Text]

20. Lund, G., Andersson, L., Lauria, M., Lindholm, M., Fraga, M. F., Villar-Garea, A., Ballestar, E., Esteller, M. & Zaina, S. (2004) DNA methylation polymorphisms precede any histological sign of atherosclerosis in mice lacking apolipoprotein E. J. Biol. Chem. 279:29147-29154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Post, W. S., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J., Wilhide, C. C., Heldman, A. W., Sussman, M. S., Ouyang, P., Milliken, E. E. & Issa, J. P. (1999) Methylation of the estrogen receptor gene is associated with aging and atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc. Res. 43:985-991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Milner, J. A. (2004) Molecular targets for bioactive food components. J. Nutr. 134:2492S-2498S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Gaudet, F., Hodgson, J. G., Eden, A., Jackson-Grusby, L., Dausman, J., Gray, J. W., Leonhardt, H. & Jaenisch, R. (2003) Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation. Science (Washington, DC) 300:489-492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Yang, A. S., Estecio, M.R.H., Garcia-Manero, G., Kantarjian, H. M. & Issa, J.-P.J. (2003) Comment on "Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation" and "Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation". Science (Washington, DC) 302:1153b.[Free Full Text]

25. Vermeulen, E.G.J., Stehouwer, C.D.A., Valk, J., van der Knaap, M., van den Berg, M., Twisk, J.W.R., Prevoo, W. & Rauwerda, J. A. (2004) Effect of homocysteine-lowering treatment with folic acid plus vitamin B6 on cerebrovascular atherosclerosis and white matter abnormalities as determined by MRA and MRI: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 34:256-261.[Medline]

26. Zhou, J., Moller, J., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., Larsen, M. L., Austin, R. C. & Falk, E. (2003) Effects of vitamin supplementation and hyperhomocysteinemia on atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 168:255-262.[Medline]

27. Moghadasian, M. H., McManus, B. M., Nguyen, L. B., Shefer, S., Nadji, M., Godin, D. V., Green, T. J., Hill, J., Yang, Y., Scudamore, C. H. & Frohlich, J. J. (2001) Pathophysiology of apolipoprotein E deficiency in mice: relevance to apo E-related disorders in humans. FASEB J. 15:2623-2630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Li, E. (2002) Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:662-673.[Medline]

29. Hansson, G. K., Libby, P., Schönbeck, U. & Yan, Z.-Q. (2002) Innate and adaptive immunity in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 91:281-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Ross, R. (1999) Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. New. Engl. J. Med. 340:115-126.[Free Full Text]

31. Hayden, M. R. & Tyagi, S. C. (2004) Homocysteine and reactive oxygen species in metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and atheroscleropathy: the pleiotropic effects of folate supplementation. Nutr. J. 3:4.[Medline]

32. Schroecksnadel, K., Frick, B., Wirleitner, B., Winkler, C., Schennach, H. & Fuchs, D. (2004) Moderate hyperhomocysteinemia and immune activation. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 5:107-118.[Medline]

33. Yi, P., Melnyk, S., Pogribna, M., Pogribny, I. P., Hine, R. J. & James, S. J. (2000) Increase in plasma homocysteine associated with parallel increases in plasma S-adenosylhomocysteine and lymphocyte DNA hypomethylation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:29318-29323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Issa, J.-P. (1999) Aging, DNA methylation and cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol.-Hematol. 32:31-43.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
J. A. Zeh and D. W. Zeh
Viviparity-driven Conflict: More to Speciation than Meets the Fly
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2008; 1133(1): 126 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Stenvinkel and T. J. Ekstrom
Epigenetics--a helpful tool to better understand processes in clinical nephrology?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1493 - 1496.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Agrawal, W.-K. Hofmann, N. Tidow, M. Ehrich, D. v. d. Boom, S. Koschmieder, W. E. Berdel, H. Serve, and C. Muller-Tidow
The C/EBP{delta} tumor suppressor is silenced by hypermethylation in acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3895 - 3905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Herrmann, O. Taban-Shoma, U. Hubner, A. Pexa, H. Kilter, N. Umanskaya, R. Hans Straub, M. Bohm, and W. Herrmann
Hyperhomocysteinemia and Myocardial Expression of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Rats
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 773 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Loscalzo
Homocysteine Trials -- Clear Outcomes for Complex Reasons
N. Engl. J. Med., April 13, 2006; 354(15): 1629 - 1632.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. Rodenhiser and M. Mann
Epigenetics and human disease: translating basic biology into clinical applications
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 31, 2006; 174(3): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. L. Ulrey, L. Liu, L. G. Andrews, and T. O. Tollefsbol
The impact of metabolism on DNA methylation
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(suppl_1): R139 - R147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaina, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaina, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]