![]() |
|
|
Catalán Institute of Oncology, LHospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain and * Department of Public Health of Guipúzcoa, San Sebastian, Spain
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paujak{at}iconcologia.catsalut.net.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: nitrosamines heterocyclic amines polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons food database cancer risk
Through their diets, humans are exposed to complex mixtures of substances that may be involved in causing, modulating, and preventing diseases. Among potential dietary carcinogens, there are 3 groups of compounds, nitrosamines, heterocyclic amines (HAs),3 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), that are not naturally present in foods but may develop during preservation or cooking. Nitrosocompounds are formed in foods during preservation. Endogenous nitrosamines can be formed from their precursors, nitrates and nitrites, which are present in foods, as well (1). Volatile nitrosamines appear to be the primary agent in the carcinogenic process; nitrosamines are often found in salted, pickled, and/or fermented foods. Cooking foods at high temperatures results in the formation of PAHs, which adhere to the surface of the food (2). Charred surfaces of meat and fish also contain HAs, which are formed from creatine or creatinine, amino acids, and sugars.
There are 2 main classes of HAs, aminoimidazol-quinolines and aminoimidazol-pyridines. Among the latter, [2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazol(4,5,b)pyridine] (PhIP) accounts for most of the overall HA exposure (3). All of them were found to be carcinogenic under experimental conditions and in animal models; however, their health effects in humans have not been clearly established. The most common nitrosamines and PAHs, as well as [2-amino-3-methyllimidazo(4,5,f)quinoline] (IQ), are classified by the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC) as 2A, whereas other nitrosamines and most HAs are classified as 2B (4). On the other hand, even though diet is the main source of exposure in the general population, these chemicals are also present in the occupational environment, tobacco smoke, and air pollution due to incomplete combustion of organic matter. Most epidemiologic studies concerning the effects of such compounds are based on selected groups that are exposed to relatively high levels of contaminants in an occupational setting or residents living near potential sources of pollution. Dietary exposure studies are usually based on indirect measures, such as consumption of preserved foods or red meat.
There is no conclusive evidence that any cooking method is causally related to cancer risk, but diets that are rich in meats cooked at high temperatures may increase the risk of colorectal and gastric cancers (5). Apart from Chinese-style preserved fish, which was found to cause nasopharyngeal cancer, there is no convincing evidence that other preserved foods cause cancer. In any case, foods that have a high content of nitrosamines may be associated with increases in colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers (5).
One of the main difficulties in assessing the effects of the dietary nitrosamines, PAHs, and HAs is the lack of information about the levels of these compounds in foods. Because they are not a natural component of foods and do not have nutritional value, they are not included in food composition databases. Furthermore, assessment of the intake of some compounds is hampered because their concentrations depend on the cooking methods used in the preparation of various foods. This information is not included in most food intake questionnaires. The purpose of this paper is to present a complete and standardized database that includes the concentrations of nitrosamines, PAHs, and HAs in foods and to estimate intakes of these 3 groups of potential dietary carcinogens.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following information was extracted from each publication: 1) food information: name, preservation, and cooking method, including temperature, cooking time, and degree of doneness; 2) measurement information: value and type of value (mean, median, range, other), analytical method, and sampling method; and 3) publication information: year, author, country, and type of publication (review or original data).
The selection of these variables was made according to recommendations for the development of food composition databases (8,9), and taking into account data that were considered relevant to the final concentration of each individual compound.
After we compiled the database, it was reviewed by experts on both the specific chemical compounds and the food composition databases. In addition to checking the preliminary version of the table, in most cases, they recommended or directly provided additional data sources and references.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The amounts were expressed in mg/100 g food for nitrates and nitrites, and in µg/100 g food for nitrosamines. Concentrations of HA are expressed as ng/g, and concentrations of PAH are reported as µg/kg. Units were chosen based on those usually reported in the literature for each compound.
Within each group of compounds, the list of food items is grouped according to a standard classification (10), including the following subgroups or individual foods: potatoes: potatoes and tubers; vegetables: leafy vegetables, root vegetables, cruciferous, other vegetables; fruits: fresh fruits, dry fruits; milk and dairy products: milk, cheese, yogurt; cereals and cereal products: bread, pasta, rice, flour; meat and meat products: fresh beef, pork, chicken, sausage, hamburgers; fish: fresh fish, canned fish, seafood; eggs; fats: butter, margarine, oils; sweets: biscuits, cake, chocolate, sugar; alcoholic beverages: wine, whisky, beer; nonalcoholic beverages: coffee, tea, cacao.
The cooking methods used are reported using standard definitions as well (10,11). When relevant and available, characteristics of cooking (time, temperature), and degree of doneness of foods were provided. Most analytical methods were based on chromatographic techniques, mainly HPLC or GC. Given the diversity of sampling methods used by different authors we simply reported whether the information on number and origin of samples was complete, incomplete, not specified, or not available. In most papers, the amount of each chemical compound in a food item was given as a crude or weighted mean. Finally, the author, country, and year of the publication and the reference are reported. The complete database, in both English and Spanish, is available in printed (12) and electronic versions4 (13).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A related issue concerns the quality of information collected. We did not specify a priori criteria of exclusion, except that the data reported were not to be aimed at monitoring environmental pollution in a specific area. In any case, publications that were included varied in quality; however, it was important that the analytic methods used were described. Most of these were based on chromatography, the most widely accepted method to measure food components.
The database will be useful for estimating dietary intakes of nitrosamines, PAHs, and HA in epidemiologic and nutritional studies. This will provide a basis for investigating potential relations between such compounds and the risk of different cancers, particularly those of the digestive tract, such as colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers. Assessments of the relations between dietary factors and such tumors have been based mainly on the intake of foods in which these compounds are found. However, these foods may be sources of many other components that may play a role in cancer risk. For instance, PAHs and HAs are related to meat intake, but meat consumption may be correlated with a diet rich in energy and SFA, which may in turn be associated with cancer risk.
Another potential application of the table is the assessment of dietary biomarkers. Most of the compounds included in our database or their metabolites may damage the structural integrity of DNA; this occurs primarily as covalent carcinogen binding, and is referred to as carcinogen-DNA adduct formation. DNA binding appears to be linear over a wide dose range for many compounds, suggesting the usefulness of measuring adducts in the assessment of exposure. DNA adducts likely reflect the cumulative exposure to carcinogens after the action of metabolizing enzymes and despite the action of repair enzymes. They are, therefore, markers of cumulative, unrepaired DNA damage (14). Intake of the compounds of interest themselves, rather than the intake of foods that contain these compounds, is a better estimate to use when investigating correlations between adduct levels and exposure. These comparisons should take into account other potential sources such as tobacco smoke and occupational exposures.
In some cases, different sources provided information concerning the same food item. We did not group these values; instead, we present all of them with the relevant information. It allows the reader to select the most appropriate value for a particular study, taking into consideration the origin of the data, giving preference to values coming from the same country, or measured by a technique thought to be more reliable. The year of publication is also important, mainly for nitrosamines, because curing and preservation practices have changed over time, resulting in a marked decrease in the concentration of nitrosocompounds in foods, particularly in Western countries (15).
The availability of a food composition database will never overcome the limitations of the dietary assessment instrument used. Thus, even high-quality food composition tables will produce poor estimates when combined with low-quality data due to of the lack of validity and/or reliability of a dietary questionnaire. Particular attention must be paid to the influence of cooking methods, especially for compounds such as HAs, which are highly affected by factors related to the method and degree of cooking.
In conclusion, we present a food composition database of potential dietary carcinogens based on data gathered from several sources. This database will allow many nutritional researchers to go one step further in the assessment of dietary exposure to some food components, and to be able to analyze their potential associations with cancer risk.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: HA, heterocyclic amines; IQ, [2-amino-3-methyllimidazo(4,5,f)quinoline]; NPRO, N-nitrosoproline; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PhIP, [2-amino-1-methyl-phenylimidazo(4,5,b)pyridine]. ![]()
4 The complete database of levels of nitrosamines, heterocyclic amines, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in foods is available with the online posting of this paper at www.nutrition.org. ![]()
Manuscript received 19 March 2004. Initial review completed 27 April 2004. Revision accepted 28 May 2004.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Nijinsky, W. (1999) N-Nitroso compounds in the diet. Mutat. Res. 443:129-138.[Medline]
2. Cameroon, N., Sunhat, R., Hsu, CH., Greenberg, A. & Rothman, N. (2001) Analysis of 200 food items for benzoic[a]preen and estimation of its intake in an epidemiologic study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 39:423-436.[Medline]
3. Augustsson, K., Skog, K., Jagerstad, M. & Steineck, G. (1997) Assessment of the human exposure to heterocyclic amines. Carcinogenesis 18:1931-1935.
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2004) Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity to Humans. IARC monographs Vol. 182 2004 http://monographs.iarc.fr. [Last updated January 2004, last accessed March 2004].
5. World Cancer Research Fund (1997) Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective 1997 American Institute for Cancer Research Washington, DC.
6. United States National Library of Medicine (2000) Medline 19662000 2000 United States National Library of Medicine Bethesda, MD.
7. EMBASE (2004) EMBASE, the Excerpta Medica database 2004 Elsevier Science Bibliohraphic Database, Elsevier 19992004 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
8. Vignat, J., Unwin, I., Ireland, J., Moller, A. & Charrondiere, U. R. (2002) Guideline notes for preparing and exporting food composition data according to the common formats of export files. ENDB Project, IARC Internal Report 2002 International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, France.
9. Rand, W. M., Pennington, J.A.T., Murphy, S. P. & Klensin, J. C. (1991) Compiling data for food composition data bases 1991 The United Nations University Press Tokyo, Japan.
10. Slimani, N., Deharveng, G., Charrondiere, R. U., van Kappel, A. L., Ocke, M. C., Welch, A., Lagiou, A., van Liere, M., Agudo, A. & Pala, V., et al (1999) Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 58:251-266.[Medline]
11. National Cancer Institute (2004) CHARRED: computerized heterocyclic amines resource for research in epidemiological studies. Cooking methods conversions 2004 http://charred.cancer.gov/cookingMethodConversions.html. [Last accessed March, 2004].
12. Jakszyn, P., Ibáñez, R., Pera, G., García-Closas, R., Agudo, A., Amiano, P. & González, C. A. (2004) Food content of potential carcinogens 2004 Catalán Institute of Oncology Barcelona, Spain.
13. Jakszyn, P., Ibañez, R., Pera, G., García-Closas, R., Agudo, A., Amiano, P. & González, C. A. (2004) Food content of potential carcinogens 2004 http://epic-spain.com/libro.html. [Last accessed April 2004].
14. Williams, J. A. (2001) Single nucleotide polymorphisms, metabolic activation and environmental carcinogenesis: why molecular epidemiologists should think about enzyme expression. Carcinogenesis 22:209-214.
15. Paik, D. C., Saborio, D. V., Oropeza, R. & Freeman, H. P. (2001) The epidemiological enigma of gastric cancer rates in the US: was grandmothers sausage the cause?. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:181-182.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Varraso, R. Jiang, R. G. Barr, W. C. Willett, and C. A. Camargo Jr. Prospective Study of Cured Meats Consumption and Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Men Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1438 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Ward, A. J. Cross, H. Divan, M. Kulldorff, S. Nowell-Kadlubar, F. F. Kadlubar, and R. Sinha Processed meat intake, CYP2A6 activity and risk of colorectal adenoma Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1210 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jakszyn, S. Bingham, G. Pera, A. Agudo, R. Luben, A. Welch, H. Boeing, G. del Giudice, D. Palli, C. Saieva, et al. Endogenous versus exogenous exposure to N-nitroso compounds and gastric cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST) study Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2006; 27(7): 1497 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Neuhouser, L. F. Tinker, C. Thomson, B. Caan, L. V. Horn, L. Snetselaar, L. M. Parker, R. E. Patterson, R. Robinson-O'Brien, S. A. A. Beresford, et al. Development of a Glycemic Index Database for Food Frequency Questionnaires Used in Epidemiologic Studies J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1604 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||