![]() |
|
|
U.S. Department of Agriculture ARS Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks ND, 58202 and * Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jprohask{at}d.umn.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: copper deficiency rats motor function behavior copper repletion
Development of full cognitive potential is a recognized goal of all human cultures. Although there are many external factors that can influence intellectual development, one factor, optimal neonatal nutrition, can be evaluated and implemented to achieve success. Wauben and Wainwright (1) reviewed the critical role nutrition plays in behavioral development. In particular, adequate protein, carbohydrate, essential fatty acids, zinc, iron, choline, vitamin C, vitamin B-12, and folic acid were documented. It is quite probable that there are other key nutrients that affect central nervous system (CNS)4 development.
Accumulating evidence supports the importance of copper for brain development and function. Clinical awareness of copper limitation is recognized in the altered hematological profile. The connection between copper limitation and anemia dates to 1848 and the disease chlorosis (2). Recognition of a role for copper in brain development was first appreciated in 1937 in ataxic sheep born to copper-deficient ewes (3). Laboratory rodents born to copper-deficient dams display many gross alterations to the CNS such as missing cerebella, focal necrosis of the cerebral cortex, and lesions in the corpus striatum (4). Humans missing the P-type ATPase, ATP7A, cannot transport copper through cells properly and develop Menkes disease, a fatal neurological degenerative disorder (5).
The biochemical mechanisms responsible for the neuropathology of copper deficiency remain elusive. It is generally believed that changes in cuproenzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), dopamine-ß-monooxygenase (DBM), and peptidylglycine-
-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) could explain abnormal development and function. However, elucidation of critical enzymes and mechanisms remains a work in progress.
Two major factors that influence the development of neuropathology after copper deficiency are the degree of copper limitation and the timing of the onset of deficiency. The requirement for dietary copper to support gestation and lactation is much greater than that needed for adult homeostasis (6). In fact, it is difficult to assess copper status in adults because few, if any, established biochemical markers of copper status change when dietary copper is restricted to conventional foods low in copper (7). Consequently, some question exists whether copper deficiency is really an important public health issue. However, copper deficiency is clearly an important concern for neonates. As reviewed previously, copper restriction during lactation in rodents lowers brain copper concentrations by 80%, whereas postlactation copper restriction lowers brain copper by only 30% (8). The reductions in organ copper levels are proportional to dietary copper intakes. Thus, both dietary copper concentration and the timing of inadequate copper intakes are critical.
Another important issue is recovery from copper deficiency. Are there long-term consequences of perinatal copper deficiency? Offspring of Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to perinatal copper deficiency exhibited a blunted auditory startle response 5 mo after repletion with copper (8). Biochemically all differences between copper-adequate controls and formerly copper-deficient males and females disappeared after 5 mo of repletion except for reduced brain copper in repleted rats in several brain regions.
The current study sought to confirm and extend previous work using a different rat strain, Holtzman, and a wider battery of tests to evaluate neurobehavioral function, including motor and sensory function, activity, memory, and avoidance behavior.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
After 3 mo of repletion a cohort of 10 male rats, 5 controls (formerly +Cu) and 5 Cu-repleted (CuR) (formerly Cu), were killed to evaluate copper status. The remaining males (representing all 14 litters) n = 40, 20 controls and 20 CuR, were shipped to the GFHNRC in Grand Forks, ND for behavioral assessments and necropsy. Rats were coded by ear punch; their dietary history was not known to the investigators until assessments and necropsy were completed. At the GFHNRC, rats were housed in a climate-controlled room (temperature 22 ± 2°C; relative humidity 45 ± 10%) with a 12-h dark-light cycle (06001800 h dark), and fed a diet of Purina Laboratory Rodent Chow 5012 (Ralston Purina) and demineralized water for the remainder of the study.
Rats were housed at the GFHNRC for >30 d before behavioral assessments to permit adaptation to their new surroundings and diet, and handled individually for at least 5 min/wk to increase comfort with human contact and reduce anxiety during behavioral assessments.
For UMD data, rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether and decapitated. A sample of blood was collected to measure ceruloplasmin activity and hemoglobin. Livers and brains were removed and processed for biochemical analyses. For GFHNRC data, 6-mo-old rats were anesthetized with a ketamine hydrochloride and remifentanil hydrochloride solution, and blood was drawn via heart puncture. Rats were then decapitated and whole brain, liver, and right femur were removed and processed for biochemical analyses of copper and iron.
Biochemical analyses.
At UMD, plasma from hematocrit tubes was used to measure ceruloplasmin activity by following the oxidation of o-dianisidine (11). Portions of liver and diet (
1 g), and the entire cerebral cortex were weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg and wet-digested with 4 mL of concentrated HNO3 (Trace Metal Grade, Fisher Scientific); the residue was brought to 4.0 mL with 0.1 mol/L HNO3. Samples were then analyzed for total copper and iron by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (Model 2380, Perkin-Elmer). The method was verified using a certified standard, U.S. National Bureau of Standards 1577 bovine liver. At GFHNRC, hematocrit and hemoglobin were determined by automated cell counter (Cell-Dyn model 3500CS, Abbott). Femurs were cleaned with cheesecloth (Labcraft, CMS) to the periosteal surface and, along with other tissues, freeze-dried in a triphilizer (FTS System) at 25°C for 67 d. Subsequently, all samples were digested (160°C) with 16 mol/L ultrapure nitric acid (VWR Scientific) in Teflon tubes (Nalge), and then wet-ashed with a 1:3 solution of 16 mol/L HNO3:30% H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide, superoxol stabilized, VWR Scientific). All samples were diluted 1:10 with 1 mol/L HCL (Vycor, double-distilled, GFS Chemicals). Samples were then analyzed for copper and iron using an inductively coupled argon plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICAP model Optima 330DV, Perkin-Elmer). The method was checked with certified standards, U.S. National Bureau of Standards 1577B bovine liver and 1567A wheat flour.
Behavioral assessments.5
Auditory startle, short-term behavioral activity, spatial memory, and avoidance behavior were each evaluated twice, at
P140 and P210, and long-term behavioral activity and motor function were each evaluated once, at
P160 and P180, respectively. All behavioral assessments were done under red-light conditions between 0800 and 1600 h, during the dark phase of the light-dark cycle and at least 2 h after the onset of dark.
Auditory startle was evaluated with a Coulbourn Instruments Acoustic Startle System. After a 5-min habituation period, a 110-dB scale A white noise burst (50 ms duration, 2 ms rise/fall time) was presented during 25 trials (30-s mean intertrial interval) and peak and mean response amplitudes (g), latency to peak response amplitude (s), and mean duration of response (s) were recorded.
Short-term spontaneous behavioral activity was evaluated for 30 min with a Coulbourn Instruments Tru Scan Photobeam Activity System. Analyzed data included total number, distance (cm) and time (s) of all movements, number and time (s) of stereotypic (repeated) and circular movements, number of vertical movements (rearing) and nose pokes, and number of entries and time (s) spent in different areas of the arena.
Spatial memory was evaluated with a Coulbourn Instruments 8-arm radial maze. Arms/feeders were baited with precision 20 mg Noyes Dustfree Sucrose Reward Tablets (PJFSC-0020, Research Diets). Memory assessment generally followed the traditional procedure described by Olton and Samuelson (12). After 5 d of training with restricted access to previously visited arms, performance was evaluated during 3 consecutive 5-min trials. Analyzed data included number of entries, reentries, time (s) spent in each arm, and food consumed.
Avoidance behavior was evaluated with the elevated plus-maze procedure described by Pellow et al. (13). Number of entries and time (s) spent in the open and closed arms of the maze were determined during 2 consecutive 5-min trials. For half of the rats, the first trial began when the rat was placed in the center of the maze facing an open arm and the second trial began when the rat was placed in the center of the maze facing a closed arm; starting orientation was reversed for the other half of the rats.
Long-term spontaneous behavioral activity in the rats home cage was evaluated for 44 h (2 consecutive 22-h periods) with a Coulbourn Instruments Infrared Home Cage Activity Monitoring System. Number and time (s) spent involved in large (sustained) and small (brief) body movements in 3 dimensions were determined.
Motor function was evaluated with the accelerating rotorod procedure described by Tilson (14). A test trial began when the rat was placed on the rod facing the back of the chamber and ended when it fell to the floor, with time on the rod determined by a technician using a stopwatch. After training on a stationary rod and then on a rod rotating at the constant rate of 1 rpm, time (s) on rod (latency to fall, 210 s maximum) and speed attained in rpm were recorded as rod rotation increased from 1 to 20 rpm (1 rpm increase every 10 s); 3 trials were run each day for 5 consecutive days.
Statistics.
At UMD, dietary treatment effects were evaluated by Students t test after variance equality was tested,
= 0.05, or by factorial ANOVA (Statview 4.5, Abacus Concepts). At GFHNRC, biochemical data were analyzed for treatment effects with Students t test,
= 0.05. Behavioral data meeting parametric distribution assumptions were analyzed with Students t test (one-session) or mixed-model ANOVA (multiple sessions),
= 0.05; the Tukey-Kramer test was used for subsequent contrasts. Nonparametric behavioral data (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P < 0.01) were analyzed as ranked data with Wilcoxon 2-Sample or F-approximation to Friedmans test for 1 and multiple sessions, respectively (SAS 8.02, SAS Institute).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biochemical and clinical variables. Compared with +Cu dams, Cu dams had near total loss of ceruloplasmin diamine oxidase activity, a 75% lower liver copper concentration, and a robust increase in liver iron concentration after the 5-wk treatment period (2 wk of gestation and 3 wk of lactation) (Table 1). Body weight and hemoglobin concentration were not affected by diet history of the dams. Male pups from Cu dams exhibited signs consistent with copper deficiency compared with +Cu offspring at P21 (Table 1). These features included lower (P < 0.05) body weight, hemoglobin, ceruloplasmin, and liver copper concentration. Liver iron content was not altered. Brain copper concentration was 87% lower in cortex samples from Cu pups compared with +Cu pups. Interestingly, we also detected a significantly lower iron concentration in the cortex of Cu rats. The absolute difference is likely less than measured because these organs were not perfused, and the iron contamination from blood would be greater in the +Cu rats because the hemoglobin concentration was higher (Table 1).
|
|
Behavior. After 6 mo of repletion, the performance of CuR rats was inferior to that of controls on measures of motor function. On the rotorod task, both mean speed (Fig. 2, panel A) and mean time running on the rod (Fig. 2, panel B) were lower in CuR rats than in controls. Remarkably, other measures of neurobehavioral function, including auditory startle, short- and long-term behavioral activity, spatial memory, and avoidance behavior, did not indicate consistent differences between the 2 treatment groups.5
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current studies, one interesting new finding was that brain iron levels were lower after copper deficiency even after 3 mo of repletion and without evidence of anemia, thus ruling out blood contamination as an issue with nervous tissue. The physiologic importance of this small change in brain iron is not known. Frank iron deficiency does alter dopamine metabolism and related behaviors, including motor behavior, in developing animals (16). This difference in brain iron persisted even in the autopsy data of the rats after more than 6 mo.
It could be argued that the nutritional deprivation of copper in these studies was very severe and unlike what might occur in human populations. However, it should be noted that earlier studies by others found maturation defects in the brains of male rats when the dietary level of copper was 1.8 mg/kg (17). Therefore, a rather modest reduction in dietary copper can have a significant effect during the developmental period. This issue of the requirement for copper during early development compared with adulthood was recently underscored in a different rodent model (6). Another seminal study indicated that feeding a diet containing 2.6 mg/kg copper during reproduction and lactation compared with a diet with 6.7 mg/kg had an effect on brain copper in 6-mo-old offspring, whereas copper concentrations in other tissues were not affected (18). Brain copper concentrations were lower in both males and females in that experiment. Therefore, a diet considered adequate in copper, resulting in no biochemical manifestations in peripheral organs, was insufficient to saturate brain copper pools if fed during a critical period of development. Certain populations may be at greater risk for copper deficiency. For example, babies born to teenage mothers, whose copper intake is below the RDA and still require copper for their own growth, or premature infants, because of inappropriate transfer of copper from mother to baby, may require extra copper supplementation during the developmental period.
The cerebellum, a region in which cells develop postnatally in rats, would certainly be a region subject to nutritional insult. Thus, the abnormal motor behavior observed in the current experiment and in a previous study demonstrating abnormal foot splay are both consistent with changes in cerebellar function after copper deficiency (8). It was somewhat surprising that we found no blunted auditory startle response in the CuR rats given that there was a robust persistent alteration in startle in our previous study (8). In fact, a smaller cohort of CuR rats evaluated at GFHNRC previously did confirm altered startle (unpublished data). However, both that study and the previously published study used Sprague-Dawley rats. The current experiments used Holtzman rats. Although highly related genetically, perhaps differences in strain may explain the different outcomes in auditory startle. It is also possible that some other subtle differences in procedures may be responsible. It is worth noting that in the current study, 4 of 19 CuR rats, contrasted with only 1 of 20 controls, were excluded from statistical analysis due to the absence of a measurable startle response on a sufficient number of trials (
25%) to yield reliable data. Therefore, 21% of CuR rats had essentially no auditory startle response at all, a finding that is consistent with previous studies.
It is always difficult to pinpoint potential mechanisms that could be responsible for persistent abnormal behavior in otherwise healthy renourished animals. The rats in this experiment are no different. Because copper is required for
10 different cuproenzymes, it is possible that limiting activity of any one of these might explain the altered persistent behavioral outcomes in these studies. One candidate that is being pursued is the cuproenzyme dopamine-ß-monooxygenase. This protein is required for development of mammals as indicated in the embryonic lethality of null mice lacking DBM (19). A deficiency of norepinephrine during critical brain development might decrease synaptic connections and maturation of neurons, thus affecting behavioral, and in particular, motor responses. Some of these potential neurochemical defects may be irreversible. For example, there is a parallel situation that occurs after neonatal iron deficiency in which irreversible changes in dopaminergic function were demonstrated (20). It is also quite possible that the changes in other key enzymes such as SOD, PAM, or CCO may also play a role in the abnormal behavior observed in the repleted rats in this study. Further research is required to determine with greater precision the perinatal period most vulnerable to inadequate copper nutrition and the mechanistic basis of the persistent neurobehavioral abnormalities.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Northern Plains Area, is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer and all agency services are available without discrimination. Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: CCO, cytochrome c oxidase; CNS, central nervous system; +Cu, copper-adequate dams/pups; Cu, copper-deficient dams/pups; CuR, copper-replete offspring; DBM, dopamine-ß-monooxygenase; E, embryonic day; GFHNRC, USDA ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center; P, postnatal day; PAM, peptidylglycine-
-amidating monooxygenase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; UMD, University of Minnesota Duluth. ![]()
5 Detailed descriptions of equipment and procedures used for behavioral assessments, and tables showing results of all behavioral assessments are available as supplemental data with the online posting of this paper at www.nutrition.org. ![]()
Manuscript received 1 April 2004. Initial review completed 26 April 2004. Revision accepted 20 May 2004.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Wauben, I. P. & Wainwright, P. E. (1999) The influence of neonatal nutrition on behavioral development: a critical appraisal. Nutr. Rev. 57:35-44.[Medline]
2. Fox, P. L. (2003) The copper-iron chronicles: the story of an intimate relationship. Biometals 16:9-40.[Medline]
3. Bennetts, H. W. & Chapman, F. E. (1937) Copper deficiency in sheep in Western Australia: a preliminary account of the etiology of enzootic ataxia of lambs and an anemia of ewes. Aust. Vet. J. 13:138-149.
4. Carlton, W. W. & Kelly, W. A. (1969) Neural lesions in the offspring of female rats fed a copper-deficient diet. J. Nutr. 97:42-52.
5. Danks, D. M., Campbell, P. E., Stevens, B. J., Mayne, V. & Cartwright, E. (1972) Menkess kinky hair syndrome. An inherited defect in copper absorption with widespread effects. Pediatrics 50:188-201.
6. Prohaska, J. R. & Brokate, B. (2002) The timing of perinatal copper deficiency in mice influences offspring survival. J. Nutr. 132:3142-3145.
7. Milne, D. B. (1994) Assessment of copper nutritional status. Clin. Chem. 40:1479-1484.
8. Prohaska, J. R. & Hoffman, R. G. (1996) Auditory startle response is diminished in rats after recovery from perinatal copper deficiency. J. Nutr. 126:618-627.
9. American Institute of Nutrition (1977) Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc committee on standards for nutritional studies. J. Nutr. 107:1340-1348.
10. American Institute of Nutrition (1980) Second report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc committee on standards for nutritional studies. J. Nutr. 110:1726.
11. Prohaska, J. R. (1991) Changes in Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase, cytochrome c oxidase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione transferase activities in copper-deficient mice and rats. J. Nutr. 121:355-363.
12. Olton, D. S. & Samuelson, R. J. (1976) Remembrance of places past: spatial memory in rats. J. Exp. Psychol. (Anim. Behav.) 2:97-116.
13. Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E. & Briley, M. (1985) Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 14:149-167.[Medline]
14. Tilson, H. A. (1987) Behavioral indices of neurotoxicity: what can be measured?. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 9:427-437.[Medline]
15. Prohaska, J. R. & Bailey, W. R. (1995) Persistent neurochemical changes following perinatal copper deficiency in rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 6:275-280.
16. Beard, J. (2003) Iron deficiency alters brain development and functioning. J. Nutr. 133:1468S-1472S.
17. Hunt, C. D. & Idso, J. P. (1995) Moderate copper deprivation during gestation and lactation affects dentate gyrus and hippocampal maturation in immature male rats. J. Nutr. 125:2700-2710.
18. Hopkins, R. G. & Failla, M. L. (1995) Chronic intake of a marginally low copper diet impairs in vitro activities of lymphocytes and neutrophils from male rats despite minimal impact on conventional indicators of copper status. J. Nutr. 125:2658-2668.
19. Thomas, S. A., Matsumoto, A. M. & Palmiter, R. D. (1995) Noradrenaline is essential for mouse fetal development. Nature (Lond.) 374:643-646.[Medline]
20. Beard, J., Erikson, K. M. & Jones, B. C. (2003) Neonatal iron deficiency results in irreversible changes in dopamine function in rats. J. Nutr. 133:1174-1179.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K Georgieff Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 614S - 620S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||