![]() |
|
|
Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 and * Department of Exercise Science and Sport Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: campbellw{at}cfs.purdue.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: calcium elderly protein adequacy hyperparathyroidism
Dietary protein affects calcium metabolism and may affect longer-term bone homeostasis (1,2). One line of thinking is that high dietary protein intake promotes urinary calcium loss and contributes to negative calcium balance and osteoporosis (3). In contrast, Hannan et al. (4) found that elderly men and women with relatively lower protein intake had increased bone loss at the femoral neck and spine over a 4-y period. Although this suggests that maintaining higher protein intake was important for maintaining bone and minimizing bone loss in elderly persons, a mechanism for this effect has not been demonstrated. A few provocative studies recently reported that protein intakes at or somewhat below the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)4 of 0.8 g protein/(kg · d) for as short a period as 4 d resulted in decreased calcium absorption, increased serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations (in some cases exceeding clinical normalcy consistent with secondary hyperparathyroidism), and increased serum calcitriol concentrations (58). The strikingly quick onset and apparent consistency of these indices of secondary hyperparathyroidism in response to protein intakes less than or equal to the RDA (57) suggest that the RDA for protein negatively affects short-term calcium homeostasis (2). This condition could be reversed by increasing dietary protein intake. Further investigation of the potentially detrimental effect of inadequate protein intake on calcium metabolism and bone health is warranted (9,10), including more evaluations of a possible relation between protein intake and parathyroid hormone. Our objective was to determine whether broad changes in dietary protein intake that span the range of adequacy would alter serum PTH concentration. The results from 2 controlled feeding studies are reported.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study 1: experimental design. A 3-trial randomized crossover study was completed, with all measurements made from d 712 of each trial, as described below. The experimental conditions were the same during each trial, except that each woman consumed a different amount of dietary protein. A minimum 1-wk washout period occurred between the trials during which each woman consumed her habitual diet. Blood samples from fasting subjects were obtained from an anticubital vein on d 12 of each trial. Four 24-h urine collections were made on d 710 of each trial.
Study 1: diet. Throughout each trial the women were provided foods and beverages, using a rotating schedule of 3 menus that contained a total energy content equal to 1.75 times the resting energy expenditure, predicted from the Harris-Benedict equation for women (11). The protein intake during each trial was set at 1.00 g protein/(kg · d) (adequate protein intake, APro, 125% of RDA), 0.75 g protein/(kg · d) (marginal protein intake, MPro, 94% of RDA), or 0.50 g protein/(kg · d) (inadequate protein intake, IPro, 63% of RDA). Animal muscle tissues were not provided in the menus due to their higher protein contents, although animal-based proteins were provided in the forms of dairy and egg-based proteins. The nonprotein energy content of each of the 3 diets was kept constant at 65% carbohydrate and 35% fat. To enhance adaptation to the subsequent protein intake (12), each subject consumed for 1 d at the start of each trial a diet that contained 0.2 g protein/(kg · d). Each subject was required to abstain from consuming alcohol and using salt-containing seasonings throughout the 3 trials. The energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat, fiber, calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, and sodium contents of the menus were calculated using Nutritionist Pro computer software (First Databank) (Table 1). Each woman consumed weekday morning meals under supervision at our dining facility and all remaining meals were packaged to take home. All dishes, glassware, and utensils were scraped and rinsed with water and the rinsings consumed. Each woman consumed daily 1 multivitamin-multimineral supplement tablet (Advanced Formula Centrum, Lederle Laboratories).
|
Study 2: experimental design. Each participant completed a continuous 2-wk controlled diet period, with measurements made at the end of wk 1 and 2. The participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments, as described below. Blood samples were obtained from fasting subjects from an anticubital vein on d 7 and 14; 24-h urine collections were made on d 5, 6, 12, and 13.
Study 2: diet. During wk 1, all of the participants consumed a diet that provided 1.2 g protein/(kg · d). During wk 2, 6 men and 5 women continued to consume the diet that contained 1.2 g protein/(kg · d) (higher protein intake, HPro, 150% of RDA), and 6 men and 7 women consumed a diet that contained 0.2 g protein/(kg · d) for 1 d, followed by a diet that contained 0.5 g protein/(kg · d) for the remainder of the study (inadequate protein intake, IPro, 63% of RDA). The 1-d very low protein menu was used to enhance adaptation to the subsequent protein intake (12). Each participants menus were individualized to contain sufficient energy for body weight maintenance and a nonprotein energy content of 65% carbohydrate and 35% fat, were muscle-tissue-free, and contained animal-based proteins from dairy and egg sources. The subjects were not allowed to use salt-containing seasonings or consume alcohol during the study. The energy, protein, carbohydrate, fat, fiber, calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, and sodium contents of the menus were calculated using Nutritionist Pro computer software (First Databank) (Table 2). The setting (i.e., at or away from the laboratory dining facility), the procedures for consuming the meals (i.e., scraping and rinsing), and the daily ingestion of 1 multivitamin-multimineral supplement tablet were the same as those described for study 1.
|
Statistical methods. Values are reported as means ± SD. Data were analyzed using the JMP Statistical Discovery Software (SAS Institute). Differences between groups and at different time points were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. Data from 1 man assigned to the high protein group in study 2 were excluded from the analyses because his serum PTH concentration at wk 1 was above clinical normalcy.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For all 3 trials together, urinary total nitrogen excretion (P < 0.05) and blood urea nitrogen (P < 0.001) were lower in the younger women than in the elderly women (Table 3). For all women together, urinary total nitrogen excretion and blood urea nitrogen decreased in those consuming the APro to MPro to IPro diets (P < 0.001). Intact PTH did not differ between the younger and elderly women, and was not different among the 3 protein intakes.
|
Urinary total nitrogen excretion and blood urea nitrogen did not differ between the HPro and IPro groups at wk 1. From wk 1 to 2, they were unchanged in the HPro group and decreased in the IPro group, consistent with dietary compliance and altered protein metabolism (Table 4). Intact PTH did not differ between the HPro and IPro groups at wk 1, and was not changed in either group at wk 2.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the basis of their data, Kerstetter et al. (6) hypothesized that reduced calcium absorption is the primary consequence of low protein intake. This, in turn, would lead to a decline in serum calcium and cause a compensatory increase in PTH secretion and increased renal calcitriol production. However, although this model fits their data, the decline in intestinal calcium absorption concurrent with increased serum calcitriol levels is inconsistent with the well-characterized ability of calcitriol to stimulate intestinal calcium absorption (13,14). Kerstetter et al. (5) also noted that their data on the effect of dietary protein on serum PTH contrasts with data in men and postmenopausal women. Finally, the Kerstetter model (5) is not supported by previous data by Hannan et al. (4) or Dawson-Hughes and Harris (15) in elderly men and women. Although both of these experiments showed that lower dietary protein intakes are associated with increased bone loss, this effect did not differ significantly between the lowest tertile [0.89 ± 0.28 g protein/(kg · d); Dawson-Hughes and Harris (15)] or quartile [0.240.71 g protein/(kg · d); Hannon et al. (4)], which were at or lower than the RDA, and the next highest tertile/quartile, [i.e., a range similar to that studied by Kerstetter et al.; 0.720.96 g protein/(kg · d) in Hannon et al. (4); 1.08 ± 0.37 g protein/(kg · d) in Dawson-Hughes and Harris (15)]. In addition, the study of Dawson-Hughes and Harris (15) showed higher intestinal calcium absorption (P < 0.05) and lower serum PTH (nonsignificant) in subjects within the lowest tertile of dietary protein intake. The lack of agreement between the Kerstetter data (57) and these trials may reflect differences in the physiologic response to acute changes in dietary protein intake (i.e., Kerstetters group) vs. chronic consumption of diets of different protein content [Hannon et al. (4) or Dawson-Hughes and Harris (15)] or the age of the study groups. Although this suggests that the phenomenon might be specific to young women or acute interventions, the results from our study 1, in which the effect of acute changes in protein intake was not noted in either young or elderly women, do not support this contention.
A weakness in our study design was that dietary calcium, phosphorus, and sodium intakes were not well controlled. The diets used in our studies were specifically formulated to control protein intake, the nonprotein macronutrient distribution, and energy, but not other nutrients. As a result, diets with lower dietary protein were also lower in calcium, phosphorus, and sodium. This is similar to a study previously reported by Shapses et al. (16) who showed that urinary markers of bone resorption did not change when dietary protein was increased from 0.44 to 2.71 g protein/(kg · d) for 5 d. This dietary change was also associated with an increase in dietary calcium from 423 to 1589 mg/d, which prompted Kerstetter et al. (17) to caution that the variability in calcium intake might obscure an effect of dietary protein on bone resorption. Although controlling the intake of these nutrients at constant levels would have improved dietary control in both our study and the earlier study by Shapses et al. (16), the direction of the error would not compensate for the proposed effect of low dietary protein intake on PTH; instead, it would have increased the likelihood of an abnormal PTH response [i.e., low dietary calcium intake promotes secondary hyperparathyroidism in humans (14)]. The fact that PTH was not elevated when low-protein diets were consumed even in the face of low dietary calcium intake suggests that the low dietary protein phenomenon is not real.
In conclusion, the results from these 2 studies indicate that the consumption of inadequate dietary protein for 1 to 2 wk does not adversely affect intact PTH or result in clinical hyperparathyroidism in younger and older humans.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG15750, M01 RR14288), the United States Department of Agriculture (9835200-6151), and the Purdue University MARC/AIM Summer Research Program. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: APro, adequate protein intake; HPro, higher protein intake; IPro, inadequate protein intake; MPro, marginal protein intake; NcAMP, nephrogenous cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PTH, parathyroid hormone; RDA, Recommended Dietary Allowance. ![]()
Manuscript received 6 February 2004. Initial review completed 8 March 2004. Revision accepted 21 May 2004.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Dawson-Hughes, B. (2003) Interaction of dietary calcium and protein in bone health in humans. J. Nutr. 133:852S-854S.
2. Kerstetter, J. E., OBrian, K. O. & Insogna, K. L. (2003) Low protein intake: the impact on calcium and bone homeostasis in humans. J. Nutr. 133:855S-861S.
3. Barzel, U. S. & Massey, L. K. (1998) Excess dietary protein can adversely affect bone. J. Nutr. 128:1051-1053.
4. Hannan, M. T., Tucker, K. L., Dawson-Hughes, B., Cupples, L. A., Felson, D. T. & Kiel, D. P. (2000) Effect of dietary protein on bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 15:2504-2512.[Medline]
5. Kerstetter, J. E., Caseria, D. M., Mitnick, M. E., Ellison, A. F., Gay, L. F., Liskov, T.A.P., Carpenter, T. O. & Insogna, K. L. (1997) Increased circulating concentrations of parathyroid hormone in healthy, young women consuming a protein-restricted diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66:1188-1196.
6. Kerstetter, J. E., OBrian, K. O. & Insogna, K. L. (1998) Dietary protein affects intestinal calcium absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:859-865.[Abstract]
7. Kerstetter, J. E., Svastisalee, C. M., Caseria, D. M., Mitnick, M. E. & Insogna, K. L. (2000) A threshold for low-protein-diet-induced elevations in parathyroid hormone. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72:168-173.
8. Giannini, S., Nobile, M., Sartori, L., Carbonare, L. D., Ciuffreda, M., Corro, P., DAngelo, A., Calo, L. & Crepaldi, G. (1999) Acute effect of moderate dietary protein restriction in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria and calcium nephrolithiasis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69:267-271.
9. Roughead, Z. K. (2003) Is the interaction between dietary protein and calcium destructive for bone?. Summary. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 133:866S-869S.
10. Spence, L. A. & Weaver, C. M. (2003) New perspectives on dietary protein and bone health: preface. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 133:850S-851S.
11. Harris, J. A. & Benedict, F. G. (1919) A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man 1919 Carnegie Institute of Washington Washington, DC.
12. Scrimshaw, N. S. (1996) Criteria for valid nitrogen balance measurement of protein requirements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 50(suppl. 1):S196-S197.
13. Song, Y., Kato, S. & Fleet, J. C. (2003) Vitamin D receptor (VDR) knockout mice reveal VDR-independent regulation of intestinal calcium absorption and ECaC2 and calbindin D9k mRNA. J. Nutr. 133:374-380.
14. Dawson-Hughes, B., Stern, D. T., Shipp, C. C. & Rasmussen, H. M. (1988) Effect of lowering dietary calcium intake on fractional whole body calcium retention. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 67:62-68.[Abstract]
15. Dawson-Hughes, B. & Harris, S. S. (2002) Calcium intake influences the association of protein intake with rates of bone loss in elderly men and women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75:773-779.
16. Shapses, S. A., Robins, S. P., Schwartz, E. I. & Chowdhury, H. (1995) Short-term changes in calcium but not protein intake alter the rate of bone resorption in healthy subjects as assessed by urinary pyridinium cross-link excretion. J. Nutr. 125:2814-2821.
17. Kerstetter, J. E., Mitnick, M. E., Gundberg, C. M., Caseria, D. M., Ellison, A. F., Carpenter, T. O. & Insogna, K. L. (1999) Changes in bone turnover in young women consuming different levels of dietary protein. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84:1052-1055.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. Thalacker-Mercer, C. A. Johnson, K. E. Yarasheski, N. S. Carnell, and W. W. Campbell Nutrient Ingestion, Protein Intake, and Sex, but Not Age, Affect the Albumin Synthesis Rate in Humans J. Nutr., July 1, 2007; 137(7): 1734 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E Thalacker-Mercer, J. C Fleet, B. A Craig, N. S Carnell, and W. W Campbell Inadequate protein intake affects skeletal muscle transcript profiles in older humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1344 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||