Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, P. M.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:568-573, March 2004


Human Nutrition and Metabolism

A High Dairy Protein, High-Calcium Diet Minimizes Bone Turnover in Overweight Adults during Weight Loss1

Jane Bowen, Manny Noakes and Peter M. Clifton2

CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.clifton{at}csiro.au.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Weight loss induces bone resorption and this can be attenuated by calcium supplementation. Protein-rich diets were recently associated with favorable effects on bone density, although this remains controversial. We hypothesized that a diet high in calcium and protein would minimize bone resorption during weight loss compared with a lower calcium, protein-rich diet. The effects of dietary calcium in high protein diets on calcium excretion and bone metabolism were examined in overweight adults (n = 50, BMI 33.4 ± 2.1 kg/m2) during 12 wk of energy restriction followed by 4 wk of energy balance. Subjects were randomly assigned to isoenergetic diets (5.5 MJ/d, 34% energy from protein, 41% carbohydrate, 24% fat) high in either dairy protein (DP, 2400 mg Ca/d) or mixed protein sources (MP, 500 mg Ca/d). During energy restriction, weight loss was 10% (-9.7 ± 3.8 kg, P < 0.01), and 24-h urinary calcium excretion decreased independently of diet (-1.09 ± 0.23 mmol/d, P < 0.01). By wk 16, the MP diet group had a 40% greater increase in deoxypyridinoline (bone resorption marker) than the DP diet group (P = 0.008). Osteocalcin (bone formation marker) increased from wk 0 to 16 in only the MP diet group [+2.16 ± 0.63 µg/L (+0.63 ± 0.11nmol/L), P = 0.001]. In conclusion, weight loss was associated with increased bone resorption, yet the DP diet had a modest advantage over the MP diet by minimizing overall turnover. Combined with reduced urinary calcium excretion, this suggests that a high-protein, calcium-replete diet may protect against bone loss during weight reduction.


KEY WORDS: • bone turnover • calcium • dairy • humans • weight loss

Energy restriction and weight loss in overweight and obese adults is associated with increased bone resorption (1,2) and a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD)3 (1,3). This has been attributed in part to reduced dietary calcium intake during energy restriction (4). Indeed, calcium supplementation attenuates these changes in bone metabolism (5,6). This effect may be maximized by providing calcium from dairy sources because these foods are associated with greater intestinal calcium absorption compared with supplemental forms (7).

High-protein diets, which are currently popular among dieters, have been criticized for potentially detrimental effects on bone health. These claims are based on metabolic studies that reported acutely elevated urinary calcium excretion after a large intake of isolated protein (8,9). The acid produced as a consequence of protein metabolism obligates increased urinary calcium losses (10,11).

Increased calcium losses, however, do not appear to adversely affect bone metabolism. The literature reports an overall beneficial relationship between high dietary protein and bone health. Large prospective studies showed a positive correlation between dietary protein and high BMD and/or low fracture rate (1215), although this is not consistently observed (16). Intervention studies also demonstrated that mixed diets rich in protein do not raise calcium excretion (17) or bone turnover (1820).

Heaney (21) proposed an explanation for this discrepancy between metabolic and "free living" studies. Increases in calcium excretion may reduce extracellular calcium concentration, which stimulates parathyroid hormone circulation (a hormone that increases intestinal calcium absorption). Because dietary calcium is positively associated with protein intake in self-selected diets (22), greater calcium intake and absorption may match the losses associated with increased protein metabolism. In support of this, the relation previously described in prospective studies was not significant at lower calcium intakes (less than ~500 mg/d) (15,19,23,24).

Two longer-term, controlled intervention studies compared the effect of high-protein and high-carbohydrate diets on bone metabolism during weight loss. A 6-mo study that employed high-protein and high-carbohydrate diets consumed ad libitum reported that the change in bone mineral content was correlated with the change in fat mass, independently of protein intake (3). In an energy-controlled 16-wk weight loss study, increased pyridinoline (Pyr) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpr) (markers of bone resorption) excretions were associated with energy restriction, independently of the protein to carbohydrate ratio (25).

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a protein-rich diet that is also high in calcium minimizes the effect of energy restriction and weight loss on bone turnover. Additionally we tested the effect of high-protein intake on urinary calcium excretion.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Subjects. Subjects were recruited by public advertisement (n = 156) and screened (n = 116) if they had a BMI between 27 and 40 kg/m2, were aged 20–65 y and had no clinically relevant medical history. Exclusion criteria included known lactose intolerance, use of calcium supplements, widely fluctuating exercise patterns, and an inability to comply with study requirements. Inclusion criteria included not breast-feeding or pregnant if female. Sixty-nine subjects satisfied all inclusion and exclusion criteria and 60 subjects commenced the intervention. The study was approved by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Division of Health Sciences and Nutrition Human Ethics Committee and all subjects gave informed written consent.

    Study design. Sixty subjects matched for BMI, gender, age and menopausal status were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, high dairy protein diet (DP) or high mixed protein diet (MP). The study consisted of a 12-wk phase of energy restriction (ER) followed by a 4-wk phase of energy balance (EB). Subjects attended the CSIRO Clinical Research Unit (Adelaide, Australia) every 2 wk for consultation with a qualified dietitian and/or clinical measurements; 24-h urine samples were collected in wk 0, 12, 16. Venous blood samples from subjects who had fasted overnight were collected in wk 0, 12, 16. Assessments made during wk 0 represent baseline data; wk 12 and 16 represent the end of ER and EB phases, respectively.

    Dietary intervention. The DP and MP diets were matched in energy (5.5 MJ/d) and macronutrient composition, i.e., high protein (34% energy, ~110g/d), moderate carbohydrate (41% energy) and low fat (24% energy). The two diets differed in the type of protein foods (Table 1) and calcium intake (DP, ~2400 mg/d; MP, ~500 mg/d). An increase in energy intake (up to 7 MJ/d) was made at baseline for active individuals without changing the macronutrient profile.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Prescriptive menu of high dairy protein (DP) diet and high mixed protein (MP) diet during energy restriction (ER, wk 0–12) and energy balance (EB, wk 12–16) periods

 
Subjects attended individual consultations with the same dietitian every 2 wk throughout the study for instruction on the dietary requirements, method for recording food intake, and assessment of compliance. Subjects were issued digital kitchen scales with which to weigh food. Two cups (473 mL) or more of vegetables per day were encouraged (excluding potato, sweet potato, corn, avocado, olives). A range of additional low-energy foods was allowed. Two standard servings of alcohol (10 g alcohol) were permitted each week. Eating at restaurants was limited to less than once in 2 wk. In wk 0, 4, 8, and 12, subjects were supplied with foods consistent with their allocated diet to encourage compliance. Each supply provided ~60% of total energy intake for 7 d and was equivalent in macronutrient composition between treatment groups.

The energy intake to achieve energy balance during wk 12–16 was calculated on an individual basis, i.e., 2000 kJ/d for each 0.5 kg of weight lost per week averaged over wk 8–12. The increased energy was provided mainly by carbohydrate and foods rich in fat (Tables 1, 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Composition of high dairy protein and high mixed protein diets during energy restriction (ER) and energy balance (EB) periods1, 2

 
All food and beverages consumed were recorded using a weighed food checklist. Nutrient analysis was performed on reported intake records for 3 d/mo (2 wk days and 1 weekend day) using Food Works Analysis Package 3.0 (Xyris Software), based on data from the Australian Food Composition Tables (26). Two qualified dietitians conducted all dietary counseling and nutrient analysis. Both were trained to provide consistent information to subjects and in the methodology for analysis.

Clinical measurements

    Body weight and composition. Subjects were weighed every 14 d (Mettler scales, model AMZ14) in light clothing and without shoes after an overnight fast. Height was measured on a stadiometer (Seca) in wk 0. BMI was calculated by weight (kg)/height (m)2. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Norland Medical Systems) was performed to assess BMD at wk 0 and 16 (Royal Adelaide Hospital).

    Urinalysis. Collection of total 24-h urine output commenced at 0700 h, (not including first morning void) on the day before attending the research clinic and was completed at 0700 h on the day of clinic attendance (including first morning void) in wk 0, 12, and 16. Samples were refrigerated during the collection process; 24-h samples were weighed and aliquots stored at -20°C. Urine samples were measured at the Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (Adelaide) for creatinine (Cr), urea, calcium, phosphate, and sodium using proprietary techniques on the Olympus AU5400 chemistry analyzer (Japan). Dpr and Pyr were measured using HPLC (27) and expressed per mmol Cr.

    Biochemistry. Blood was collected in sodium fluoride/EDTA (1 g/L) tubes for plasma osteocalcin determination and stored on ice until processed. The plasma was isolated by centrifugation for 10 min at 2000 x g (5°C) (Beckman GS-6R Centrifuge CA) and stored at -80°C. Biochemical analyses were performed after study completion and all samples for each individual were measured in one assay. Plasma osteocalcin was measured by an immunometric assay (catalog number LKOC1) on an Immulite Analyzer.

    Statistics. All subjects who completed the study were included in the data analysis, independent of reported dietary compliance, indicated by food record, body weight, and urinary urea excretion relative to Cr. Results are presented for 50 subjects, except DEXA (n = 49 subjects) and urinary analysis (n = 47 subjects) due to incomplete data.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS11.0 for WINDOWS. Data were assessed for normal distribution. An independent t test was used to assess differences between treatment groups at baseline. Diet data were analyzed using an unpaired t test. ANOVA with repeated measures was used to determine the effects of time (factor), diet (i.e., DP or MP), and gender (between-subject factors). Data were reanalyzed with baseline BMI as a covariate. BMD data were analyzed for interactions with diet, gender, menopausal status, and weight loss. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05. All data are presented as means ± SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Baseline characteristics. Fifty subjects completed the study; 10 subjects withdrew from the study after commencement (DP; n = 5, MP; n = 5) due to illness (n = 2), work commitments (n = 2), personal reasons (n = 2), noncompliance (n = 2), and loss to follow up (n = 2). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 3. Women assigned to the DP diet had higher baseline BMI than women assigned to the MP diet (P < 0.01). There were no baseline differences between gender or treatment group for BMD, urinary calcium, phosphate, Dpr:Cr and Pyr:Cr, and plasma osteocalcin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Baseline characteristics of participants1

 
    Dietary composition and compliance. Overall protein intakes were 106 ± 3 and 116 ± 4 g/d during ER and EB, respectively, independent of dietary group, and this was significantly greater than at baseline. Subjects consumed ~1.2 g protein/kg body weight. Of total protein, 62% was from dairy sources in the DP diet compared with 5% in the MP diet (P < 0.01). Calcium intake was 3.7-fold greater in the DP group than in the MP group, 2371 ± 45 and 509 ± 24 mg/d during ER (P < 0.001) (Table 2). Total energy and the percentage of energy from protein, fat, and carbohydrate during ER and the increase in total energy, carbohydrate, protein, and fat from ER to EB was similar for both diet groups (Table 2). Dietary cholesterol intake was 28% lower in the DP group compared with the MP group during ER and 36% lower during EB. The two diets differed in the percentage of fat from monounsaturated (MUFA), PUFA, and SFA (Table 2).

Reported dietary compliance was high. Baseline urinary urea:Cr excretion was not significantly different between treatments or gender (34.3 ± 1.0). Excretion was 18% above baseline during ER (42.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.02) and remained elevated during EB (42.0 ± 1.8, P < 0.02) independent of treatment, indicating similar protein intakes and good dietary compliance. Reported energy intake was consistent with weight loss during ER and weight stability during EB. Two subjects from the DP group had no change in weight or urea:Cr throughout the study.

    Weight loss. Overall, body weight decreased by 10% during ER independently of diet and gender (DP; -9.0 ± 0.6 kg, MP; -9.3 ± 0.7 kg). There was no further weight loss during EB (DP; -9.4 ± 0.7 kg, MP; -9.5 ± 0.8 kg).

    Bone. There was no change in total BMD from baseline to EB, nor were there any interactions with diet, gender, menopausal status, or weight loss (data not shown).

    Urinary markers. Changes in urinary calcium, phosphate, and sodium were independent of diet and gender. There was a trend for decreased urinary calcium excretion from baseline to the end of ER, which was significant at the end of the EB phase, with 33% lower urinary calcium excretion compared with baseline (-1.13 ± 0.3 mmol/d, P = 0.004) (Fig. 1). ER (29.9 ± 1.5 mmol/d) was associated with an 18% reduction (-6.4 ± 2.7 mmol/d, P = 0.012) in urinary phosphate compared with baseline (36.4 ± 2.7 mmol/d) and returned to baseline level by EB (32.8 ± 1.9 mmol/d). Urinary sodium excretion did not change throughout the study (173 ± 14, 160 ± 12, 184 ± 12 mmol/d for baseline, ER, and EB, respectively).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 Urinary calcium excretion at baseline (wk 0) and at the end of the energy restriction (wk 12) and energy balance (wk 16) periods in overweight adults that consumed either a high dairy protein (DP) or a high mixed protein (MP) diet. Values are means ± SEM (DP, n = 24; MP, n = 23). 1Lower than wk 0 (P < 0.05).

 
Dpr:Cr and Pyr:Cr increased during ER and EB (Fig. 2). The increase in Pyr:Cr was independent of diet (Fig. 2, panel B). There was a time x diet interaction such that the increase in Dpr:Cr was significantly smaller in the DP diet group than in the MP diet group at the end of ER and EB (Fig. 2, panel A). Analysis of total Pyr and Dpr excretion per 24 h was also performed. Dpr excretion at wk 16 in the MP group differed from that of the DP group (256.9 ± 17.5 nmol/24 h vs. 207.4 ± 16.6 nmol/24 h, respectively, P < 0.05 before and after adjustment for baseline values). Total Pyr excretion did not differ between groups (data not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2 Urinary deoxypyridinoline:Cr (panel A) and pyridinoline:Cr (panel B) at baseline (wk 0) and at the end of the energy restriction (wk 12) and energy balance (wk 16) periods in overweight adults that consumed either a high dairy protein (DP) or a high mixed protein diets (MP). Values are means ± SEM (DP, n = 24; MP, n = 23). 1Greater than DP (P = 0.017); 2greater than DP (P = 0.008); 3greater than wk 0 (P < 0.05).

 
Plasma osteocalcin did not change from baseline to the end of the ER and EB periods in the DP group (Fig. 3). The MP group had a significant increase above baseline during the ER period and this remained elevated during EB (Fig. 3).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3 Plasma osteocalcin at baseline (wk 0) and at the end of the energy restriction (wk 12) and energy balance (wk 16) periods in overweight adults that consumed either a high dairy protein (DP) or a high mixed protein diets (MP). Values are means ± SEM, n = 25. 1Greater than DP and wk 0 (P < 0.001) Conversion factor: µg/L divided by 0.171 = nmol/L

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Both high-protein diets were associated with reduced urinary calcium excretion. Weight loss was the primary determinant of increased bone resorption; however, the MP diet group had greater elevations in markers of bone resorption and formation.

Urinary calcium excretion.

Increasing protein intake can increase intestinal calcium absorption and therefore urinary excretion (28). As such, a greater calcium excretion was anticipated in DP subjects, yet both treatments were associated with a 33% decrease.

Metabolism of dietary protein (particularly fish, meat, and cheese) is associated with acid generation, which can reduce blood pH (29) and cause obligatory calcium losses (21). Metabolism of noncheese dairy foods, fruit, and vegetables produces alkali, which can partially ameliorate the effect of acid (29). This was demonstrated in a large study (n = 350) in which increasing fruit and vegetable intake from 3.6 servings/d to 9.5 servings/d (serving size not defined by the author), without changing the amount of dietary protein, decreased urinary calcium by two thirds (30). Indeed, in the context of mixed diets, increasing dietary protein did not affect urinary calcium excretion in elderly men [0.6–2.0 g protein/(kg · d)] (31) or postmenopausal women (12–20% of total energy from protein) (18). It is possible that the overall acid load of both diets in our study was low and may partially explain the reduction in urinary calcium excretion.

Lower calcium intake compared with baseline might account for the reduction in the MP group but does not explain the reduction in the DP group, whose calcium intake was ~300% greater compared with baseline.

Finally, the reduction in urinary calcium excretion may reflect the effect of a concomitant increase in dietary phosphorus derived from animal proteins. Phosphorus can increase calcium reabsorption in the distal nephron and therefore counter the calciuric effect of reduced blood pH (7).

Bone turnover.

The increase in urinary excretion of both bone resorption markers by wk 16 in both diet groups is likely to be a result primarily of weight loss (1,2). The increases in Dpr:Cr and Pyr:Cr in this study (+46 and +44%) are similar in magnitude to previous findings in obese women (10% weight loss over 6 mo, 500 mg Ca/d), +53 and + 36%, respectively (2).

The significantly larger increase in Dpr:Cr in MP subjects is likely to reflect an additive effect on bone resorption of moderately reduced calcium intake (compared with baseline). A 25-wk weight loss study (n = 31) of overweight postmenopausal women (-10% ± 5.3% body weight) reported that the placebo-treated subjects had significantly greater Dpr and Pyr excretions (37 and 54% respectively) than the calcium-supplemented (1000 mg/d) subjects (P < 0.05) (5). Further, the literature suggests that Dpr is a more specific marker of bone collagen breakdown with lower variability; Pyr is also derived from tendon (32,33). Indeed, Shapses et al. (34) observed a significant increase only in Dpr excretion in premenopausal women during 6 mo of weight loss.

The elevated bone resorption in the MP group was accompanied by increased plasma osteocalcin. This supports previous findings in which osteocalcin excretion increased 18% in a placebo group and was unchanged in the calcium-supplemented group (5). This overall increase in bone turnover in the present study may be unfavorable for maintaining bone mass.

We did not observe any changes in BMD measured by DEXA due to the relatively short duration of this study. In a study by Ricci et al. (5), there was a trend for the low-calcium, placebo-treated group to have greater BMD loss after weight loss (P = 0.08) compared with the calcium-supplemented group, which is consistent with a similar study (6).

The population in this study was not homogenous due to the inclusion of men and pre- and postmenopausal women. However, gender and menopausal status were controlled at baseline and remained evenly distributed after withdrawals. Despite this variability, differences in bone metabolism were observed and were consistent with similar studies that included only pre- or postmenopausal women (2,5,6,35).

In conclusion, we showed that weight loss achieved by high-protein diets is associated with increased urinary excretion of bone resorption markers. This was moderately higher in MP subjects; however, it was also accompanied by an increase in markers of bone formation in this group. Additionally, increased bone turnover occurred despite a reduction in urinary calcium excretion. The reduction in calcium excretion was independent of diet and may reflect the mixed nature of the foods in the prescribed diet. Long-term studies are warranted to investigate the effect of high-protein intakes and rate of bone turnover on bone mineral density.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We acknowledge Dr. Grant Brinkworth, Dr. Paul Foster, Cherrie Keatch, Mark Mano, Rosemary McArthur, and Ruth Pinches for assistance in performing this study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by Dairy Research and Development Corporation Grant #CSHN10003. Back

3 Abbreviations used: BMD, bone mineral density; Cr, creatinine; CSIRO, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization; DEXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; DP, dairy protein; Dpr, deoxypyridinoline; EB, energy balance; ER, energy restriction; MP, mixed protein; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; Pyr, pyridinoline. Back

Manuscript received 15 October 2003. Initial review completed 3 November 2003. Revision accepted 26 November 2003.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Chao, D.E.M., Farmer, D., Register, T. C., Lenchik, L., Applegate, W. B. & Ettinger, W. H., Jr (2000) Effect of voluntary weight loss on bone mineral density in older overweight women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 48:753-759.[Medline]

2. Ricci, T. A., Heymsfield, S. B., Pierson, R. N., Jr, Stahl, T., Chowdhury, H. A. & Shapses, S. A. (2001) Moderate energy restriction increases bone resorption in obese postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:347-352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Skov, A. R., Haulrik, N., Toubro, S., Molgaard, C. & Astrup, A. (2002) Effect of protein intake on bone mineralization during weight loss: a 6-month trial. Obes. Res. 10:432-438.[Medline]

4. Benezra, L. M., Nieman, D. C., Nieman, C. M., Melby, C., Cureton, K., Schmidt, D., Howley, E. T., Costello, C., Hill, J. O., Mault, J. R., Alexander, H., Stewart, D. J. & Osterberg, K. (2001) Intakes of most nutrients remain at acceptable levels during a weight management program using the food exchange system. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 101:554-561.[Medline]

5. Ricci, T. A., Chowdhury, H. A., Heymsfield, S. B., Stahl, T., Pierson, R. N., Jr & Shapses, S. A. (1998) Calcium supplementation suppresses bone turnover during weight reduction in postmenopausal women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 13:1045-1050.[Medline]

6. Jensen, L. B., Kollerup, G., Quaade, F. & Sorensen, O. H. (2001) Bone minerals changes in obese women during a moderate weight loss with and without calcium supplementation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:141-147.[Medline]

7. Gueguen, L. & Pointillart, A. (2000) The bioavailability of dietary calcium. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19:119S-136S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Hegsted, M., Schuette, S. A., Zemel, M. B. & Linkswiler, H. M. (1981) Urinary calcium and calcium balance in young men as affected by level of protein and phosphorus intake. J. Nutr. 111:553-562.

9. Breslau, N. A., Brinkley, L., Hill, K. D. & Pak, C. Y. (1988) Relationship of animal protein-rich diet to kidney stone formation and calcium metabolism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 66:140-146.[Abstract]

10. Heaney, R. P. & Recker, R. R. (1982) Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and caffeine on calcium balance in women. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 99:46-55.[Medline]

11. Barzel, U. S. (1995) The skeleton as an ion exchange system: implications for the role of acid-base imbalance in the genesis of osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 10:1431-1436.[Medline]

12. Munger, R. G., Cerhan, J. R. & Chiu, B. C. (1999) Prospective study of dietary protein intake and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69:147-152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Promislow, J. H., Goodman-Gruen, D., Slymen, D. J. & Barrett-Connor, E. (2002) Protein consumption and bone mineral density in the elderly: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 155:636-644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Hannan, M. T., Tucker, K. L., Dawson-Hughes, B., Cupples, L. A., Felson, D. T. & Kiel, D. P. (2000) Effect of dietary protein on bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 15:2504-2512.[Medline]

15. Dawson-Hughes, B. & Harris, S. S. (2002) Calcium intake influences the association of protein intake with rates of bone loss in elderly men and women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75:773-779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Sellmeyer, D. E., Stone, K. L., Sebastian, A. & Cummings, S. R. (2001) A high ratio of dietary animal to vegetable protein increases the rate of bone loss and the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:118-122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Pannemans, D. L., Schaafsma, G. & Westerterp, K. R. (1997) Calcium excretion, apparent calcium absorption and calcium balance in young and elderly subjects: influence of protein intake. Br. J. Nutr. 77:721-729.[Medline]

18. Roughead, Z. K., Johnson, L. K., Lykken, G. I. & Hunt, J. R. (2003) Controlled high meat diets do not affect calcium retention or indices of bone status in healthy postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. 133:1020-1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Rapuri, P. B., Gallagher, J. C. & Haynatzka, V. (2003) Protein intake: effects on bone mineral density and the rate of bone loss in elderly women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77:1517-1525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Shapses, S. A., Robins, S. P., Schwartz, E. I. & Chowdhury, H. (1995) Short-term changes in calcium but not protein intake alter the rate of bone resorption in healthy subjects as assessed by urinary pyridinium cross-link excretion. J. Nutr. 125:2814-2821.

21. Heaney, R. P. (1998) Excess dietary protein may not adversely affect bone. J. Nutr. 128:1054-1057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Holbrook, T. L. & Barrett-Connor, E. (1991) Calcium intake: covariates and confounders. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53:741-744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Meyer, H. E., Pedersen, J. I., Loken, E. B. & Tverdal, A. (1997) Dietary factors and the incidence of hip fracture in middle-aged Norwegians. A prospective study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 145:117-123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Feskanich, D., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J. & Colditz, G. A. (1996) Protein consumption and bone fractures in women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 143:472-479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Farnsworth, E., Luscombe, N. D., Noakes, M., Wittert, G., Argyiou, E. & Clifton, P. M. (2003) Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on body composition, glycemic control, and lipid concentrations in overweight and obese hyperinsulinemic men and women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78:31-39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Cashel, K., English, R. & Lewis, J. (1989) Composition of foods, Australia 1989 AGPS Canberra, Australia.

27. Randall, A. G., Kent, G. N., Garcia-Webb, P., Bhagat, C. I., Pearce, D. J., Gutteridge, D. H., Prince, R. L., Stewart, G., Stuckey, B., Will, R. K., Retallack, R. W., Price, R. I. & Ward, L. (1996) Comparison of biochemical markers of bone turnover in Paget disease treated with pamidronate and a proposed model for the relationships between measurements of the different forms of pyridinoline cross-links. J. Bone Miner. Res. 11:1176-1184.[Medline]

28. Kerstetter, J. E., O’Brien, K. O. & Insogna, K. L. (1998) Dietary protein affects intestinal calcium absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:859-865.[Abstract]

29. Barzel, U. S. & Massey, L. K. (1998) Excess dietary protein can adversely affect bone. J. Nutr. 128:1051-1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Appel, L. J., Moore, T. J., Obarzanek, E., Vollmer, W. M., Svetkey, L. P., Sacks, F. M., Bray, G. A., Vogt, T. M., Cutler, J. A., Windhauser, M. M., Lin, P. H. & Karanja, N. (1997) A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 336:1117-1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Moriguti, J. C., Ferriolli, E. & Marchini, J. S. (1999) Urinary calcium loss in elderly men on a vegetable:animal (1:1) high-protein diet. Gerontology 45:274-278.[Medline]

32. Knott, L. & Bailey, A. J. (1998) Collagen cross-links in mineralizing tissues: a review of their chemistry, function, and clinical relevance. Bone 22:181-187.[Medline]

33. Seibel, M. J. (2002) Nutrition and molecular markers of bone remodelling. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 5:525-531.[Medline]

34. Shapses, S. A., Von Thun, N. L., Heymsfield, S. B., Ricci, T. A., Ospina, M., Pierson, R. N., Jr & Stahl, T. (2001) Bone turnover and density in obese premenopausal women during moderate weight loss and calcium supplementation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:1329-1336.[Medline]

35. Fogelholm, G. M., Sievanen, H. T., Kukkonen-Harjula, T. K. & Pasanen, M. E. (2001) Bone mineral density during reduction, maintenance and regain of body weight in premenopausal, obese women. Osteoporos. Int. 12:199-206.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. P. Thorpe, E. H. Jacobson, D. K. Layman, X. He, P. M. Kris-Etherton, and E. M. Evans
A Diet High in Protein, Dairy, and Calcium Attenuates Bone Loss over Twelve Months of Weight Loss and Maintenance Relative to a Conventional High-Carbohydrate Diet in Adults
J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1096 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
G. Wagner, S. Kindrick, S. Hertzler, and R. A. DiSilvestro
Effects of Various Forms of Calcium on Body Weight and Bone Turnover Markers in Women Participating in a Weight Loss Program
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2007; 26(5): 456 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. W Krieger, H. S Sitren, M. J Daniels, and B. Langkamp-Henken
Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression 1
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2006; 83(2): 260 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Noakes, J. B Keogh, P. R Foster, and P. M Clifton
Effect of an energy-restricted, high-protein, low-fat diet relative to a conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet on weight loss, body composition, nutritional status, and markers of cardiovascular health in obese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2005; 81(6): 1298 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M.-P. St-Onge
Dietary fats, teas, dairy, and nuts: potential functional foods for weight control?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 7 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
M. J. Heinig and K. Doberne
Weighing the Risks: the Use of Low-Carbohydrate Diets During Lactation
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2004; 20(3): 283 - 285.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Noakes, P. R. Foster, J. B. Keogh, and P. M. Clifton
Meal Replacements Are as Effective as Structured Weight-Loss Diets for Treating Obesity in Adults with Features of Metabolic Syndrome
J. Nutr., August 1, 2004; 134(8): 1894 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, P. M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]