Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rock, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rock, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:342-347, February 2004


Human Nutrition and Metabolism

Plasma Triacylglycerol and HDL Cholesterol Concentrations Confirm Self-Reported Changes in Carbohydrate and Fat Intakes in Women in a Diet Intervention Trial1

Cheryl L. Rock*,2, Shirley W. Flatt*, Cynthia A. Thomson{dagger}, Marcia L. Stefanick**, Vicky A. Newman*, Lovell Jones{ddagger}, Loki Natarajan*, John P. Pierce*, R. Jeffrey Chang* and Joseph L. Witztum* for the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study Group

* Departments of Family and Preventive Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA; {dagger} Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; ** Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University; and {ddagger} MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clrock{at}ucsd.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Diet intervention trials are currently testing whether reduced fat intake can reduce the risk and progression of breast cancer. Energy from dietary fat is generally replaced by energy from carbohydrate in these studies, and altering the proportion of energy from dietary carbohydrate and fat has been shown to affect plasma lipid concentrations in controlled feeding studies. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of increased carbohydrate and reduced fat intakes on plasma lipids in a randomized, controlled trial that is testing the effect of diet modification on risk for recurrence and survival in women previously treated for breast cancer. Plasma concentrations of lipids and related factors were measured at enrollment and 1-y follow-up in 393 women enrolled in the trial. Dietary goals for the intervention group focused on an increase in vegetable, fruit and fiber intakes, and reduced fat intake. Women assigned to the intervention group significantly reduced fat intake (from 28.1 to 21.0% of energy), and significantly increased intakes of carbohydrate (from 56.9 to 65.3% of energy) and fiber (from 21.0 to 29.6 g/d) (P < 0.05). Body weight did not change significantly in either study group. A small but significant increase in fasting plasma triacylglycerol concentration, and decreases in HDL cholesterol and apoprotein-A1 concentrations, were observed in the intervention group (P < 0.05) but not in the comparison group. Changes in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apoprotein-B, lipoprotein (a), and insulin concentrations, and in the LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, were not observed in either group. The lipid responses that were observed in this study provide biological evidence that validates the self-reported change in dietary intakes of fat and carbohydrate in response to the intervention efforts. The degree of change in these lipid concentrations was small and does not suggest increased cardiovascular disease risk.


KEY WORDS: • carbohydrate • dietary fat • triacylglycerol • diet intervention • cancer

The relation between dietary fat intake and the risk and progression of breast cancer has been the focus of numerous observational studies (1). Diet intervention trials are currently testing whether reduced intake of dietary fat can reduce risk for primary breast cancer (2), and whether postdiagnosis dietary modification can reduce risk for cancer recurrence (3,4). Energy from carbohydrate has replaced energy from fat in the diet in response to efforts to promote reduced fat intake in the intervention studies targeting breast cancer survivors (4,5).

In the analysis of the results of these studies, an important question is whether the intervention efforts successfully achieve a reduction in fat intake. The interpretation of self-reported data on dietary intakes collected using available methodologies (including dietary records, recalls, and FFQ) is constrained by several well-described limitations (68). In diet intervention trials, repeated dietary assessment and monitoring may affect the accuracy of reported intakes, and participants who are the focus of intervention efforts may be more likely to report diets in agreement with the goals of the intervention. Thus, dietary biomarkers can be useful to further define exposures and adherence (9).

A specific biological marker of total fat intake has not been identified or established (10). However, altering the proportion of energy intake from carbohydrate and fat has been shown to affect fasting plasma triacylglycerol concentration in numerous controlled feeding studies (11,12). Further, the magnitude of change in carbohydrate and fat intakes that promotes a change in triacylglycerol concentration in these studies appears to encompass the range being tested for effect on disease outcome in the intervention trials. In cross-sectional studies, lower levels of fat intake (13) and higher levels of carbohydrate intake (14) were associated with increased fasting plasma triacylglycerol concentrations in population-based cohorts. Also, HDL cholesterol concentration exhibited an inverse relation with carbohydrate intake and a direct relation with fat intake in several observational studies (1114).

Several factors may influence the usefulness of these nonspecific markers of change in the relative intakes of carbohydrate and fat. As reviewed by Parks and Hellerstein (11), the majority of the clinical studies demonstrating the effect of modifying carbohydrate and fat intakes on plasma triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol concentrations involved small numbers of subjects who were examined over a relatively short period of time, using formula diets rather than regular whole food and usual eating patterns. In addition, the effect of increasing carbohydrate intake on these lipids was shown to be modified by dietary fiber (11), which is often concurrently increased in association with guidance toward reduced fat intake in diet intervention trials (5), as well as by the type of carbohydrate consumed. Further, subject characteristics, such as age, degree of adiposity, baseline plasma triacylglycerol concentration, and degree of insulin resistance, may influence the lipid response to replacing fat with carbohydrate in the diet.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of intervention efforts promoting a low-fat diet on selected plasma lipid concentrations in subjects participating in a randomized, controlled trial to test the effect of diet on risk for recurrence and overall survival in women previously treated for breast cancer. The dietary goals for the intervention group in this study included a reduction in dietary fat intake and increased intakes of dietary fiber, vegetables, and fruit. We hypothesized that participants in the intervention group would exhibit increased fasting plasma triacylglycerol and reduced HDL cholesterol concentrations at 1 y postrandomization in response to the intervention efforts, reflecting a reduction in fat intake and an increase in carbohydrate intake.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Subjects. Data were obtained from a subgroup of 400 women enrolled in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study who completed dietary assessments and blood collections at baseline and 12 mo. The WHEL Study protocol, including selection criteria, data collection, and intervention methodology, are provided elsewhere (3). Procedures for this study were approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, and by the institutional review boards of each participating institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before their participation in the study. At study enrollment, data on general medical history and use of medications in general categories were collected. Participants identified for this substudy were a systematic quota sample of the first 400 women who were randomized into the WHEL Study. Within each study group (intervention and comparison), we selected the first 100 participants with dietary data who were <=50 y old at enrollment and the first 100 women who were >50 y old. Additionally, women were selected who had not changed their tamoxifen usage from baseline to 12 mo; thus, tamoxifen use remained constant over the time period of interest. This medication is known to alter plasma lipid concentrations and thus could interfere with the analysis. None of the women in this study had been prescribed insulin for control of diabetes because this was an exclusion criterion for participation in the WHEL Study (3). Six women were subsequently dropped from this analysis due to insufficient data, and one woman was excluded as an outlier because she had a baseline triacylglycerol concentration that was more than five times the SD.

    Procedures. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups, stratified by stage of disease, age, and clinic site. The comparison group was advised to consume a diet consistent with current general dietary recommendations for cancer prevention (5 servings of vegetables and fruit daily, 20 g fiber/d, and <=30% energy from fat). The intervention group was encouraged to consume 5 vegetable servings/d, 3 fruit servings/d, 480 mL vegetable juice/d, 30 g fiber/d, and 15–20% energy from fat. Dietary recommendations provided to both groups were consistent with current recommendations to control blood lipids. An intensive telephone-based diet counseling program, 12 group cooking classes, and printed materials were used to achieve diet modification in the intervention group (3). The participants in the comparison group were invited to attend 4 cooking classes unrelated to the intervention targets and were provided standard dietary guidance materials available from governmental agency sources (3).

Relevant to this substudy, the protocol involved clinic visits at enrollment and 1 y, during which a fasting blood sample was collected, height and weight were measured using standard procedures, and BMI (kg/m2) was computed.

    Dietary and physical activity data. The primary method of dietary assessment in this study consisted of repeated 24-h dietary recalls. Details regarding this dietary assessment methodology are described elsewhere (3,15). Briefly, each study participant provided four 24-h dietary recalls including two weekdays and two weekend days over a 3-wk period. Trained dietary assessors, who were unaware of the intervention or comparison group assignment of the participants, collected these data during telephone interviews. Nutrient calculations were performed using the Nutrition Data System for Research software, developed by Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota (Food and Nutrient Database 31, version 4.03, released November 2000).

At baseline and 1 y, the frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity were assessed by questionnaire and converted into metabolic equivalents (METs). Total energy expenditure was obtained by weighting time spent per week by METs: mild physical activity was weighted 3 METs, moderate activity was weighted 5 METs, and vigorous activity was weighted 8 METs. Walking METs were assigned by walking speed. Unknown speed or 3.33 km/h (2 mph) walking was weighted 2 METs, 5 km/h (3 mph) walking was weighted 3 METs, 6.67 km/h (4 mph) walking was weighted 4 METs, and >=8.33 km/h (>=5 mph) walking was weighted 6 METs (16). METs were not assigned for hours spent sitting or sleeping.

    Biochemical measurements. Blood samples collected were immediately placed on ice, protected from light, and separated within 1 h after collection, using centrifugation at 2300 x g at 4°C for 10 min. Aliquots of plasma and serum were stored at -80°C in cryogenic tubes until analysis.

Measurements of lipids were performed using an Abbott VP instrument (Abbott Laboratories) as described in the Lipid Research Clinic Manual of Laboratory Operations (17). The interassay CV was 0.8% for total cholesterol, 1.7% for total triglycerides, and 2.4% for HDL cholesterol. Apoprotein (apo)-A1, apo-B and lipoprotein (a) were determined by automated analysis using a Roche COBAS BIO instrument (Basel, Switzerland) with kits (#86111, #86070, and #86071, respectively) from Diasorin. LDL cholesterol values were calculated by the Friedewald equation (18). LDL cholesterol could not be calculated for 7 subjects because triacylglycerol concentration was >4.516 mmol/L in these cases and the equation is not valid under those circumstances (19,20). Thus, the final sample size is 393 for triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol analysis and 386 for LDL cholesterol analysis.

We also examined fasting serum insulin concentration as a surrogate for insulin resistance (21). A double antibody RIA, with <0.2% cross-reactivity with human proinsulin, was used for the analysis of insulin (Linco Research). The intra-assay CV was 3.2%, and the interassay CV was 3.9%. Data on serum insulin concentration were not available for 2 subjects due to aliquot limitations.

    Statistical analysis. Dietary values were log-transformed to ensure that they conformed to the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, and paired t tests were conducted to examine changes in dietary intakes from baseline to 12 mo in the two study groups. Some of the plasma measurements (e.g., triacylglycerol, insulin) were not adequately normalized by log transformation. Therefore, differences between plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and insulin from baseline to 12 mo in the two study groups were tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test on log-transformed values in each of the two study groups. The symmetry of the distributions was verified using quantile-quantile plots. Linear regression was used to analyze 12-mo triacylglycerol concentration as a function of the percentage of energy from fat, percentage of energy from carbohydrate, starch to sugar ratio (as a percentage of total carbohydrate), dietary fiber intake, age, BMI, degree of weight change, and baseline triacylglycerol and 12-mo fasting insulin concentrations. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (version 8.01, 1999, SAS Institute).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
At enrollment, there were no significant differences in age, BMI, level of physical activity, tamoxifen usage, and ethnic/racial distribution between the study groups (Table 1). The distribution of subjects by menopausal status, which was obtained by history, did not differ between the two study groups. Of the women in this sample, 10 reported that they had been diagnosed with high blood sugar or diabetes, distributed as 5 (3%) in each of the study groups; 19 women (10 in the comparison group and 9 in the intervention group) reported using lipid-lowering medications. Mean BMI did not change significantly in either group, averaging 27.1 ± 6.0 kg/m2 (mean ± SD) at baseline and 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m2 at 12 mo in the comparison group, and 27.7 ± 6.6 kg/m2 at baseline and 27.7 ± 6.4 kg/m2 at 12 mo in the intervention group. Similar to the characteristics of a previously described subsample of WHEL Study subjects (5), weight loss was not observed in the majority of these women: 294 women (74.8%) were within 5% of their baseline weight at 12 mo, weight loss of >5% baseline weight occurred in 46 women (11.7%), and 53 women (13.5%) gained >5% of their baseline weight at 12 mo. The level of physical activity did not change significantly from baseline to 12 mo in either study group (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Demographic and other characteristics of the women in a diet intervention trial at baseline by study group assignment1

 
Both groups reported a small reduction in energy intake over time (Table 2). A reduction in energy intake from fat from baseline to 12 mo also was observed in both groups, although the magnitude of the change differed considerably (a 1.1% mean reduction for the comparison group and a 6.9% mean reduction for the intervention group). As shown in Table 2, the intervention group reported a significant increase in the percentage of energy from carbohydrate and mono- and disaccharides and an increase in dietary fiber intake. Mono- and disaccharides (i.e., sugars) consist of sucrose, galactose, glucose, fructose, lactose, and maltose. In the intervention group, the percentage of women with a starch to sugar ratio > 50:50 (as the percentage of carbohydrate energy) was 35% at baseline and 23% at 1 y; in the comparison group, the percentage was 36% at both time points. Mean starch to sugar ratio in both study groups at enrollment was 47:53, which remained the same in the comparison group but was 43:57 in the intervention group at 1 y.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Dietary intakes of the women in a diet intervention trial at baseline and 12 months by study group assignment1

 
In the intervention group, a small but significant increase in both triacylglycerol concentration and the ratio of total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol was observed, in addition to a significant reduction in HDL cholesterol and apo-A1 concentrations (Table 3). However, no change in the LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio was noted. None of these factors changed significantly in the comparison group. Changes in concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apo-B, lipoprotein (a), and fasting insulin were not observed in either group. Analysis that excluded the subjects with high blood sugar or diabetes and those reporting use of lipid-lowering medications produced the same results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Plasma lipid and serum insulin concentrations of the women in a diet intervention trial at baseline and 12 months by study group assignment1

 
In the intervention group, 14% of women at baseline and 13% of women at 1 y had fasting triacylglycerol concentration >2.25 mmol/L, the cut-off point currently applied to identify high triacylglycerol concentration (22). In the comparison group, 16% of women at baseline and 14% of women at 1 y had fasting triacylglycerol concentration > 2.25 mmol/L. In the intervention group, 83.3% had triacylglycerol concentration within the normal range at both time points; 10.2% were high at both time points, 2.5% had normal concentration at baseline but high at 12 mo, and 4.1% were high at baseline but normal at 12 mo. The distribution in the comparison group was not different: 79.2% of the group had triacylglycerol concentration within the normal range at both time points, 8.6% were high at both time points, 5.1% had normal concentration at baseline but high at 12 mo, and 7.1% were high at baseline but normal at 12 mo.

In women who lost weight, this factor influenced the plasma triacylglycerol response. Women in the comparison group who lost >=5% of initial body weight from baseline to 1 y (n = 20) exhibited a significant decrease in plasma triacylglycerol concentration (P < 0.05). Women in the intervention group who lost >=5% of initial body weight from baseline to 1 y (n = 26) did not exhibit any change in plasma triacylglycerol concentration, suggesting that concurrent weight loss attenuated the effect of change in diet composition on response (data not shown).

In a linear regression analysis for 12-mo plasma triacylglycerol concentration, the percentage of energy from carbohydrate was a significant predictor of triacylglycerol concentration, but the percentage of energy from fat, the starch to sugar ratio, and fiber intake did not independently contribute to the variance (Table 4). As anticipated, plasma triacylglycerol concentration at enrollment was a significant predictor of the concentration at 12 mo. Also, triacylglycerol concentration was significantly associated with serum fasting insulin concentration and weight loss.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Predictors of 12-mo plasma triacylglycerol concentration in women in a diet intervention trial (n = 391)1, 2

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The lipid responses that were observed in this study, increased plasma triacylglycerol and decreased HDL cholesterol and apo-A1 concentrations, provide biological evidence that validates the self-reported change in dietary intakes of fat and carbohydrate in response to the WHEL Study intervention efforts. These responses were evident at 1 y postrandomization, suggesting a sustained alteration in these concentrations in response to diet modification. Notably, the degree of change was small and does not suggest increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Although nonspecific, these lipid responses may be suitable indicators of adherence to a dietary pattern that is low in fat, when other influencing factors are considered.

The identification of dietary biomarkers is currently considered an important research goal for nutritional epidemiology (23). These dietary biomarkers are particularly meaningful in intervention studies, because adherence is a crucial issue in the interpretation of the observed effect of the intervention on disease outcomes. The effect of reduced fat intake on breast cancer outcomes is currently being examined in clinical trials (24), and the identification and refinement of biological indicators relevant to fat and carbohydrate intakes would be useful. As validated by substantially increased plasma carotenoid concentrations (2426), the WHEL Study diet intervention efforts were shown previously to result in a major increase in vegetable and fruit intake.

Increased plasma triacylglycerol and reduced HDL concentrations were observed quite consistently in response to increased carbohydrate and reduced fat intakes in controlled feeding studies in which energy balance was held constant (11,12). However, many issues relating to these lipid responses are still unresolved. The controlled feeding studies have predominantly involved formula feeding (rather than regular food) and have been of short duration (11). Other dietary factors (e.g., fiber, type of carbohydrate), weight loss despite efforts to achieve an isocaloric comparison, and various subject characteristics influence the response. Even in the studies in which subjects consumed regular whole foods rather than formula diets, the magnitude of the difference between the high-fat, low-carbohydrate and low-fat, high-carbohydrate conditions in these studies has typically been very large (11,12). This might suggest limited relevance to smaller changes in diet composition that are achievable and sustainable as a result of intervention efforts in disease prevention studies. For example, Parks et al. (27) observed a 60% increase in triacylglycerol concentration at 5 wk in response to a low-fat (15% of energy), high-carbohydrate (68% of energy) diet compared with a control diet (35% energy from fat, 50% energy from carbohydrate) based on whole foods, in which mono- and disaccharides were limited to 44% of energy and fiber was increased from 30 to 45 g/d during the experimental period. In other studies characterized by free-living subjects, regular whole foods, and increased dietary fiber, concurrent weight loss is often a confounding factor. Turley et al. (28) examined the effects of a self-selected high-fat (36% energy from fat, 43% energy from carbohydrate) and a low-fat (22% energy from fat, 59% energy from carbohydrate) diet on serum lipids in a 12-wk crossover study involving 38 men with moderately elevated serum total cholesterol concentration. Similar to the present study, the subjects in that study were advised to replace fat with carbohydrate from grains, vegetables, legumes, and fruit, although the subject characteristics were very different. Their intervention resulted in a mean weight loss of 1.5 kg and a 14% reduction in energy from fat, which was associated with a marginally significant reduction in HDL cholesterol concentration and no change in plasma triacylglycerol concentration.

In the present study, we detected a change in plasma triacylglycerol, HDL cholesterol, and apo-A1 concentrations in response to a 7% reduction in energy from fat and an 8% increase in energy from carbohydrate, in a target group in which most subjects did not exhibit weight loss. The women in this study generally had a favorable lipid profile at enrollment (22), and changes of a large magnitude in plasma lipid concentrations were not anticipated.

Increased dietary fiber intake may have attenuated the plasma lipid response to increased carbohydrate intake in the present study, although the study was not designed to specifically test this effect. We did not identify an independent relation between fiber intake and plasma triacylglycerol concentration when considering the effect of other influencing factors in regression analysis. This suggests that increased plasma triacylglycerol concentration occurs in response to increased carbohydrate intake in spite of concurrently increased dietary fiber, as observed in controlled feeding studies (27). It has been suggested that minimizing intake of mono- and disaccharides may reduce the likelihood of increased triacylglycerol concentration in response to increased carbohydrate intake (11). Although the intervention group subjects reported a small but significant increase in the percentage of energy from mono- and disaccharides, these dietary constituents still contributed only 30% of total energy, and the change in the proportionate contribution of starch and sugars to total carbohydrate intake was relatively small. Another potentially influencing dietary factor is fish oil consumption, which has been shown to reduce plasma triacylglycerol concentration (29). In the present study, intakes of the major subtypes of dietary fat declined in response to the intervention, concurrent with the reduction in total fat intake (data not shown). However, change in carbohydrate intake (rather than change in fat intake) was the dietary factor that exhibited the strongest independent relation with plasma triacylglycerol concentration in the regression analysis that considered other influencing factors.

The relations between carbohydrate or fat intake and fasting triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol concentrations have been examined in several cohorts in cross-sectional analysis (12). For example, fat intake was inversely associated with fasting plasma triacylglycerol concentration, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, BMI, and energy intake, in 269 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (13). More recently, Liu et al. (14) found carbohydrate intake to be directly related to fasting triacylglycerol concentration (but unrelated to HDL cholesterol concentration) in a sample of 280 women in the Nurses’ Health Study, using similar adjustment variables. The present study moves the development of this lipid pattern as a biological indicator of carbohydrate and fat intake one step further. These previous epidemiologic studies involved cross-sectional analysis, but the responsiveness of a dietary biomarker to change in diet composition is an important characteristic for intervention studies, and this was observed in the present study.

As expected, we identified an independent effect of weight loss on plasma triacylglycerol concentration in the women who lost weight. We also found baseline plasma triacylglycerol concentration and fasting serum insulin concentration to relate independently to triacylglycerol concentration after the low-fat diet intervention. In previous studies of healthy women, the degree of increase in triacylglycerol concentration in response to increased carbohydrate intake was observed to be directly related to insulin resistance (30). We used fasting insulin as a surrogate for insulin resistance in the present study because the use of more precise procedures for measuring insulin resistance is not feasible in this type of study. Fasting serum insulin, as well as other approaches based on fasting insulin and glucose concentrations, was used to identify insulin resistance in many other studies (21,3133). Influencing factors such as baseline triacylglycerol concentration, weight change, adiposity, and insulin resistance modulate the response to increased carbohydrate and reduced fat intakes and should be considered in the interpretation of these plasma responses as biological indicators of dietary intake in individuals.

The degree of increase in plasma triacylglycerol and decrease in HDL cholesterol concentrations that was observed in response to the intervention was not of a degree that would indicate increased risk for cardiovascular disease as a result of the diet modification (22). The frequency of hypertriacylglycerolemia in the study groups did not change over time or differ in the intervention vs. the comparison group. Changes in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apo-B, lipoprotein (a), and fasting insulin concentrations were not observed in either the intervention or the comparison group, and most importantly, the LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio did not change. Because this ratio did not change, we conclude that the small changes in plasma lipid concentrations that were noted did not change the cardiovascular disease risk in these study participants (22).

In summary, modest changes in dietary carbohydrate and fat intakes as a result of intervention efforts to promote a low-fat dietary pattern were associated with increased plasma triacylglycerol and reduced HDL cholesterol and apo-A1 concentrations in women participating in a clinical trial that is testing the effect of diet modification on risk for breast cancer recurrence. The intervention effort was shown previously to result in substantially increased vegetable and fruit intake, associated with increased plasma carotenoid concentrations. The changes in the lipid pattern reported in the present study validate self-reported changes in fat and carbohydrate intakes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The Women’s Healthy Eating and Living Study Group: University of California, San Diego, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, San Diego, CA: John P. Pierce, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator); Cheryl L. Rock, Ph.D., R.D.; Susan Faerber, B.A.; Vicky A. Newman, M.S., R.D.; Shirley W. Flatt, M.S.; Sheila Kealey, M.P.H.; Loki Natarajan, Ph.D.; Jacqueline Major, M.S.; Linda Wasserman, M.D., Ph.D.; Center for Health Research, Portland, OR: Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Ph.D.; Mark Rarick, M.D.; Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA: Bette J. Caan, Dr.P.H.; Lou Ferenbacher, M.D.; Stanford University/University of California, San Francisco, Palo Alto, CA: Marcia L. Stefanick, Ph.D.; Robert Carlson, M.D.; University of Arizona, Tucson and Phoenix, AZ: James R. Marshall, Ph.D.; Cynthia Thomson, Ph.D., R.D.; James Warnecke, M.D.; University of California, Davis, Davis, CA: Ellen B. Gold, Ph.D.; Mary N. Haan, Dr.P.H..; Sidney Scudder, M.D.; University of California, San Diego Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA: Vicky E. Jones, M.D.; Kathryn A. Hollenbach, Ph.D.; University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX: Lovell A. Jones, Ph.D.; Richard Theriault, D.O.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA69375; California Cancer Research Fund grant 99–00548V-10147; University of California, San Diego, General Clinical Research Center National Institutes of Health grant M01-RR00827; University of California, San Francisco, General Clinical Research Center NIH grant M01-RR00079; Stanford University General Clinical Research Center NIH grant M01-RR00070; and the Walton Family Foundation. Back

Manuscript received 2 October 2003. Initial review completed 30 October 2003. Revision accepted 11 November 2003.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Rock, C. L. & Demark-Wahnefried, W. (2002) Nutrition and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review of the evidence. J. Clin. Oncol. 20:3302-3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group (1998) Design of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin. Trials 19:61-109.[Medline]

3. Pierce, J. P., Faerber, S., Wright, F., Rock, C. L., Newman, V., Flatt, S. W., Kealey, S., Jones, V. E. & Wasserman, L., et al (2002) A randomized trial of the effect of a plant based dietary pattern on breast cancer recurrence: The Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study. Control Clin. Trials 23:728-756.[Medline]

4. Chlebowski, R. T., Blackburn, G. L., Buzzard, I. M., Rose, D. P., Martino, S., Khandekar, J. D., York, R. M., Jeffery, R. W. & Elashoff, R. M., et al (1998) Adherence to a dietary fat intake reduction program in postmenopausal women receiving therapy for early breast cancer. The Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 11:2072-2080.

5. Rock, C. L., Thomson, C., Caan, B. J., Flatt, S. W., Newman, V., Ritenbaugh, C., Marshall, J. R., Hollenbach, K. A., Stefanick, M. L. & Pierce, J. P. (2001) Reduction in fat intake is not associated with weight loss in most women after breast cancer diagnosis: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 91:25-34.[Medline]

6. Black, A. E. & Cole, T. J. (2001) Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 101:70-80.[Medline]

7. Prentice, R. L., Sugar, E., Wang, C. Y., Neuhouser, M. & Patterson, R. (2002) Research strategies and the use of nutrient biomarkers in studies of diet and chronic disease. Public Health Nutr. 5:977-984.[Medline]

8. Caan, B. J., Flatt, S. W., Rock, C. L., Ritenbaugh, C., Newman, V. & Pierce, J. P. (2000) Low-energy reporting in women at risk for breast cancer recurrence. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 9:1091-1097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Potischman, N. (2003) Biologic and methodologic issues for nutritional biomarkers. J. Nutr. 133(suppl.):875S-880S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Arab, L. (2003) Biomarkers of fat and fatty acid intake. J. Nutr. 133(suppl.):925S-932S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Parks, E. J. & Hellerstein, M. K. (2000) Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71:412-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (2002) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids 2002 National Academy Press Washington, DC.

13. Willett, W., Stampfer, M., Chu, N. F., Spiegelman, D., Holmes, M. & Rimm, E. (2001) Assessment of questionnaire validity for measuring total fat intake using plasma lipid levels as criteria. Am. J. Epidemiol. 154:1107-1112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Liu, S., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Holmes, M. D., Hu, F. B., Hankinson, S. E. & Willett, W. C. (2001) Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:560-566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Thomson, C. A., Giuliano, A., Rock, C. L., Ritenbaugh, C. K., Flatt, S., Faerber, S., Newman, V., Graver, E. & Hartz, V., et al (2002) Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157:754-762.

16. Ainsworth, B. E., Haskell, W. L., Whitt, M. C., Irwin, M. L., Swartz, A. M., Strath, S. J., O’Brien, W. L., Bassett, D. R. & Schmitz, K. H., et al (2002) Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sport Exerc. 32(suppl. 9):S498-S504.

17. Anonymous (1982) 2nd ed. rev. Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis. Lipid Research Clinics Program: Manual of Laboratory Operations 1 U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Publication No. (NIH) 76–628.

18. Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I. & Frederickson, D. S. (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 18:499-502.[Abstract]

19. Legault, C. L., Stefanick, M. L., Miller, V. T., Marcovina, S. M. & Schrott, H. G. (1999) Effect of hormone replacement therapy on the validity of the Friedewald equation in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52:1187-1195.[Medline]

20. Hirsch, G. A., Vaid, N. & Blumenthal, R. S. (2002) Perspectives: the significance of measuring non-HDL cholesterol. Prev. Cardiol. 5:156-159.[Medline]

21. Haffner, S. M. (1999) Epidemiology of insulin resistance and its relation to coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 84:11J-14J.[Medline]

22. Anonymous, (2001) Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285:2486-2497.[Free Full Text]

23. Prentice, R. L. (2003) Dietary assessment and the reliability of nutritional epidemiology reports. Lancet 362:182-183.[Medline]

24. Rock, C. L., Flatt, S. W., Wright, F. A., Faerber, S., Newman, V., Kealey, S. & Pierce, J. P. (1997) Responsiveness of serum carotenoids to a high-vegetable diet intervention designed to prevent breast cancer recurrence. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 6:617-623.[Abstract]

25. Pierce, J. P., Faerber, S., Wright, F. A., Newman, V., Flatt, S. W., Kealey, S., Rock, C. L., Hryniuk, W. & Greenberg, E. R. (1997) Feasibility of a randomized trial of a high-vegetable diet to prevent breast cancer recurrence. Nutr. Cancer 28:282-288.[Medline]

26. McEligot, A. J., Rock, C. L., Flatt, S. W., Newman, V., Faerber, S. & Pierce, J. P. (1999) Plasma carotenoids are biomarkers of long-term high vegetable intake in women with breast cancer. J. Nutr. 129:2258-2263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Parks, E. J., Krauss, R. M., Christiansen, M. P., Neese, R. A. & Hellerstein, M. K. () Effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on VLDL-triglyceride assembly, production and clearance. J. Clin. Investig. 104:1087-1096.

28. Turley, M. L., Skeaff, C. M., Mann, J. I. & Cox, B. (1998) The effect of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 52:728-732.[Medline]

29. Vanschoonbeek, K., de Maat, M.P.M. & Heenskerk, J.W.M. (2003) Fish oil consumption and reduction of arterial disease. J. Nutr. 133:657-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Jeppesen, J., Schaaf, P., Jones, C., Zhou, M. Y., Chen, Y.D.I. & Reaven, B. M. (1997) Effects of low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets on risk factors for ischemic heart disease in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65:1027-1033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Matthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F. & Turner, R. C. (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412-419.[Medline]

32. Katz, A., Nambi, S. S., Mather, K., Baron, A. O., Follmann, D. A., Sullivan, G. & Quan, M. J. (2000) Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 85:2402-2410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Legro, R. S., Finegood, D. & Dunaif, A. (1998) A fasting glucose to insulin ratio is a useful measure of insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83:2694-2698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. P. Pierce, V. A. Newman, L. Natarajan, S. W. Flatt, W. K. Al-Delaimy, B. J. Caan, J. A. Emond, S. Faerber, E. B. Gold, R. A. Hajek, et al.
Telephone Counseling Helps Maintain Long-Term Adherence to a High-Vegetable Dietary Pattern
J. Nutr., October 1, 2007; 137(10): 2291 - 2296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. P. Pierce, L. Natarajan, B. J. Caan, B. A. Parker, E. R. Greenberg, S. W. Flatt, C. L. Rock, S. Kealey, W. K. Al-Delaimy, W. A. Bardwell, et al.
Influence of a Diet Very High in Vegetables, Fruit, and Fiber and Low in Fat on Prognosis Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: The Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Randomized Trial
JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 289 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. J Martin, C. V Greenberg, V. Kriukov, S. Minkin, D. J. Jenkins, and N. F Boyd
Intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet does not influence the timing of menopause.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. L. Rock, S. W. Flatt, L. Natarajan, C. A. Thomson, W. A. Bardwell, V. A. Newman, K. A. Hollenbach, L. Jones, B. J. Caan, and J. P. Pierce
Plasma Carotenoids and Recurrence-Free Survival in Women With a History of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2005; 23(27): 6631 - 6638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. L. Rock, S. W. Flatt, C. A. Thomson, M. L. Stefanick, V. A. Newman, L. A. Jones, L. Natarajan, C. Ritenbaugh, K. A. Hollenbach, J. P. Pierce, et al.
Effects of a High-Fiber, Low-Fat Diet Intervention on Serum Concentrations of Reproductive Steroid Hormones in Women With a History of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2379 - 2387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rock, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rock, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Witztum, J. L.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition