Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bento, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bento, O. P.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:3305-3312, December 2004


Nutrient Metabolism

Dietary Raw Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Reduce Plasma Total and LDL Cholesterol and Hepatic Esterified Cholesterol in Intact and Ileorectal Anastomosed Pigs Fed Cholesterol-Rich Diets1

José M. Martins2, Michel Riottot*, Manuel C. de Abreu{dagger}, Maria J. Lança{dagger}, Ana M. Viegas-Crespo**, José A. Almeida{dagger}, João B. Freire{ddagger} and Ofélia P. Bento{dagger}

Laboratório de Metabolismo Animal, ICAM/Universidade de Évora, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal; * Laboratoire d’Endocrinologie de la Nutrition-INRA, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; {dagger} Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade de Évora, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal; ** CBA/Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, 1740-016 Lisboa, Portugal; and {ddagger} Departamento de Produção Agrícola e Animal, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmartins{at}uevora.pt.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Previous studies demonstrated the cholesterol-lowering effect of dietary legumes (mainly soybeans) in animals and humans, but the mechanisms by which they exert this effect are not completely understood. The contribution of the hindgut to this hypocholesterolemic effect is also not well documented. The present work was undertaken to investigate the effect of cholesterol-enriched (2.8 g/kg) casein (C) and raw pea seed (RP) diets on the cholesterol metabolism of intact (I) and ileorectal anastomosed (IRA) growing pigs. Four groups of 6 pigs were allocated to the treatments (C-I, C-IRA, RP-I, and RP-IRA pigs) for 3 wk. Plasma total cholesterol was lowered by the RP diet through a significant decrease in LDL cholesterol. The RP diet also decreased the hepatic concentration of esterified cholesterol and increased 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase activity and LDL receptor synthesis. The biliary total cholesterol and bile acid concentrations were greater in RP- than in C-fed pigs. In addition, fecal bile acid output was higher in RP-fed pigs. The cecum-colon by-pass inhibited cholesterol and ß-sitosterol microbial transformation, lowered the bile acid output, and increased the primary to secondary bile acid output ratio, but its influence on cholesterolemia was negligible. These results suggest a hypocholesterolemic effect of the raw pea diet probably due to increased fecal bile acid output and an increased biliary bile acid concentration.


KEY WORDS: • raw pea seeds • ileorectal anastomosis • pig • cholesterol metabolism • steroid output

The cholesterol-lowering effects of legumes in humans and animal models were found in several studies (14) but in others, these effects were not present (5,6). Several mechanisms were proposed to explain this cholesterol-lowering effect; these involved legume components such as proteins and their amino acid profiles (7,8), lipid fractions, fiber (3), saponins (9,10), and phytosterols (11,12). These components could act through metabolic mechanisms, usually involving plasma amino acid or hormone concentrations (13), PUFA absorption (3), or gastrointestinal mechanisms affecting either the intestinal microflora or the enterohepatic metabolism of steroids (2,1416).

Peas are important food legumes with a world production exceeded only by soybeans, peanuts, and dry beans. For both humans and animals, dry pea seeds are a potentially rich source of protein and carbohydrates (17). A few studies were undertaken to assess the effect of peas on cholesterol metabolism, using pigs (18,19) as models for humans. This omnivorous animal is considered to be a good model for the study of diet effects on plasma cholesterol and atherosclerosis because of its physiologic and anatomical similarities to humans (20). Although a relation between cholesterolemia and intestinal digestive processes was demonstrated, the role of the hindgut and its microflora is still unclear, in contrast to the known role played by the small intestine (21,22). The microbial transformation of primary into secondary bile acids in the hindgut, for instance, could play an important regulatory role (23) because the absorption of hydrophobic secondary bile acids modulates cholesterol and bile acid synthesis in the liver (24). Thus, the by-pass of the cecum-colon section by an ileorectal anastomosis (IRA)3 allows an analysis of the role of this part of the digestive tract in cholesterol metabolism and steroid output.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of feeding whole raw pea seeds and the role of the cecum-colon section in the cholesterol metabolism and steroid output of growing pigs fed cholesterol-rich diets. To achieve this, plasma, lipoprotein, liver, bile, and fecal lipid concentrations were measured, as well as the activities of the main hepatic enzymes involved in cholesterol and bile acid synthesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Chemicals and isotopes. Solvents and chemicals of analytical grade were purchased from Merck, Prolabo (Rhône-Poulenc), and Sigma-Aldrich. Enzymatic assay kits were purchased from Roche Diagnostics GmbH and Wako Chemicals GmbH. Roquette Frères generously provided hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin. Anion exchange AG1-X8 resin was purchased from Bio-Rad and L-3-[glutaryl-3-14C]hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA, [5-3H]mevalonolactone, [4-14C]cholesterol, 25-[26,27-3H2]hydroxycholesterol, and [14C]taurocholate sodium salt from DuPont-NEN Products. Roussel-Uclaf kindly provided 25-hydroxycholesterol, and 7{alpha}- and 7ß-hydroxycholesterol were synthesized according to Yamasmita et al. (25). Emulsifier-Safe was purchased from Packard Instruments. A polyclonal antibody raised against the bovine adrenal cortex LDL receptor was kindly provided by Paul Roach. An anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-linked F(ab')2 fragment (from donkey) and the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent were acquired from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

    Animals, housing, diets, and feeding. Crossbred male pigs [n = 24; 12 wk old; Duroc boars x (Large White x Landrace sows)] from Universidade de Évora with an initial body weight (BW) of 29.8 ± 0.6 kg (mean ± SEM) were individually penned in metabolism cages (60 x 160 cm). The study was carried out in accordance with the regulations and ethical guidelines of the Portuguese Animal Nutrition and Welfare Commission (DGV, Lisboa, Portugal).

Two cholesterol-enriched diets were formulated, a semipurified casein (C) diet and a raw pea seed (RP) diet, with similar amounts of protein, essential amino acids (by supplementing with methionine and tryptophan), and gross energy. In the RP diet, ~60% of the protein supplied by casein in the C diet was replaced by protein from finely ground spring pea dry seeds (Pisum sativum cv. Solara) (Table 1). Cholesterol was solubilized in soybean oil and added to the diets (2.8 g/kg). Pigs were fed at a weekly adjusted daily rate of 50 g/kg BW in 2 equal meals (0830 and 1800 h) and had free access to water throughout the experiment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Ingredients and average composition of the experimental diets

 
    Experimental design and sampling procedures. After a postweaning period in which the pigs (n = 24) were fed a commercial diet (S801, Rações Veríssimo), hypercholesterolemia was induced by feeding the C diet for 2 wk. At the beginning of wk 3, 12 pigs underwent an end-to-side IRA (26). This surgical procedure was carried out ~40 mm anterior to the ileocecal valve and the cecum-colon section was not removed. To prevent low mineral absorption, the IRA pigs were daily supplemented with sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate (20 g each). From wk 3 onward, 6 intact (I) and 6 IRA pigs began to eat the RP diet, whereas 6 I and 6 IRA pigs continued to consume the C diet.

During wk 5, total feces, ileal digesta, and urine were collected from the pigs for 5 d. Feces were collected 2 times/d and ileal digesta at 3-h intervals. Urine was collected daily in plastic containers with sulfuric acid to prevent N loss. Diet refusal, feces, ileal digesta, and urine individual samples were stored at –20°C until analyses.

At the end of wk 5 and after a food deprivation period (~10 h), the pigs were killed by electronarcosis and bleeding. Blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture and plasma was obtained by centrifugation (20 min at 4°C and 1500 x g). Pigs were eviscerated immediately after slaughter and the organs were washed with physiologic saline and weighed. Samples (1 g) were created for fresh liver cellular fraction preparation to determine the HMG CoA reductase, CYP7A1, and CYP27A1 activities; samples (±20 g) were frozen (–80°C) until the determination of liver lipids and for immunoassays. Similar storage procedures were used for the gallbladder and its contents.

    Diet, feces, and ileal digesta analyses. The composition of the experimental diets is given in Table 1. Diet total cholesterol and phytosterols were determined by GLC as described below for fecal and ileal digesta sterols. Freeze-dried feces and ileal digesta samples (2 g) homogenized in distilled water (20 mL) were extracted with ethanol for 48 h in a Soxhlet apparatus before the addition of known amounts (20 µL) of [14C]taurocholate sodium salt and a 2-h saponification in boiling ethanolic 2 mol/L potassium hydroxide. Neutral sterols were extracted with petroleum ether, and bile acids were deconjugated (27), extracted with diethyl ether, and 14C radioactivity measured in a Tri-carb analyzer (Packard) to account for procedural losses of bile acids. The neutral sterols and free bile acids were prepared for analysis by GLC (28) in the presence of cholestane as an external standard. A Carlo-Erba HRGC 5160 chromatograph (Thermoquest) was used, equipped with a standard fused silica WCOT capillary column (length: 25 m; film thickness: 0.2 mm) cross-linked with a OV101 (Spiral) for sterols, or with a OV1701 (Spiral) for bile acids, following the conditions described by Riottot et al. (29). The daily neutral sterol and bile acid outputs were calculated after correction for fecal and ileal flow, on the basis of a 90% theoretical recovery of dietary ß-sitosterol, a reliable marker in pigs (30).

    Plasma and lipoprotein analyses. Enzymatic kits and an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 704) were used to determine plasma levels of triacylglycerols (kit 1488872, Roche Diagnostics) and phospholipids (kit MPR2 691844, Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Free cholesterol (kit 274-47109, Wako Chemicals) was measured in a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Beckman DU-530) and total cholesterol (kit 1491458, Roche Diagnostics) in an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 917). Plasma LDL cholesterol (31) and HDL cholesterol concentrations (32) were determined in an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 917) by direct enzymatic kits (3038777 and 3045935, respectively, Roche Diagnostics).

Liver analyses

    Liver lipids. Liver lipids were extracted from frozen samples (0.5 g) (28). Free and total cholesterol were measured in propanol-2 extracts, as described above. The esterified cholesterol was calculated as the difference between total and free cholesterol. Triacylglycerols and phospholipids were also analyzed as described above, in a Hitachi 917 automatic analyzer.

    Liver cellular fraction and enzymatic assays. The mitochondrial and microsomal fractions were prepared from fresh liver samples (1 g) (33), using a modified buffer with 10 mmol/L of dithiothreitol to suspend the microsomal fraction for the assay of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG CoA) reductase activity. The protein content of cellular fractions was determined (34) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Microsomal HMG CoA reductase (EC 1.1.1.34) activity was assayed by the radioisotopic technique of Philipp and Shapiro (35) with minor modifications in the preincubation time with phosphatase (60 min at 37°C) and in the incubation time after adding [14C]HMG CoA and NADPH (30 min at 37°C). Radioisotopic assays for mitochondrial sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1; EC 1.14.13.15) and microsomal cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP7A1; EC 1.14.13.17) activities were described [(33,36), respectively].

    Immunoassays. Total membranes were prepared from frozen (–80°C) liver samples (1 g) (37). The membrane proteins were solubilized in a buffer with 2% Triton X-100 (38) and quantified (34) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. The liver membrane proteins were diluted in a dilution buffer (Tris-maleate, 125 mmol/L; CaCl2, 2 mmol/L; aprotinin, 200 kIU/L; pH 6) for the immunodetection of LDL receptors. The diluted samples (1 µg in 50 µL) were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane using a Dot-blot apparatus (Bio-Rad) and incubated overnight at 4°C in a quenching buffer (Tris-HCl, 60 mmol/L; NaCl, 25 mmol/L; CaCl2, 2 mmol/L; pH 8) with 5% fat-free milk. The membranes were washed 3 times with Tween-Tris buffered saline (TTBS) (NaCl, 500 mmol/L; Tris-base, 250 mmol/L; Tween 20, 0.05%; pH 7.5) and incubated for 90 min in the presence of an antibody against LDL receptors diluted 1:2000 in the incubation buffer (Tris-HCl, 60 mmol/L; NaCl, 25 mmol/L; CaCl2, 2 mmol/L; pH 8) containing 0.1% fat-free milk. The membranes were washed 3 times with TTBS, incubated for 90 min with anti-immunoglobulin antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase diluted at 1:5000; after a new TTBS 3-wash cycle, they were incubated for 1 min with a chemiluminescence reagent. Sensitive films (Hyperfilm, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were exposed, developed, and scanned with a laser densitometer Ultroscan 2222 (LKB). The relative LDL receptor content in each spot was estimated by the scan peak height and expressed in arbitrary units/mg protein. The linearity of the response as a function of the protein quantity spotted was verified. The specific antibodies raised against the LDL receptor gave a unique band in Western blots with apparent molecular weights of ~130 kDa.

    Gallbladder bile analyses. Bile total lipids were extracted into propanol-2 (28), and bile total cholesterol and phospholipids were determined using enzymatic kits and a Beckman DU-530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer.

Bile samples were diluted (1:1) into propanol-2, and the total bile acid concentrations were determined (39) in an Uvicon 930 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Kontron Instruments). The individual bile acid concentrations were assayed by GLC as described by Riottot et al. (29). The lithogenic indices were calculated according to Thomas and Hofmann (40) and Carey (41).

    Calculation and data analyses. Results are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed by a two-way ANOVA for diet and IRA effects with the statistical software Statview 5.0 (SAS Institute). When the interaction was significant, a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test was used as a post-hoc test. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Physiological and organ weight data. The daily weight gain was higher (P < 0.01) in RP- than in C-fed pigs and lower (P < 0.05) in IRA than in I pigs (Table 2). The daily intakes of food (P < 0.05), neutral detergent fiber (NDF; P < 0.001), and cholesterol (P < 0.05) were higher in RP- than in C-fed pigs. Nitrogen retention also tended to be higher (P = 0.07) in RP-fed pigs, but metabolizable energy (data not shown) was not affected by treatments. Diet and IRA did not affect relative liver weights but the gallbladders and their contents relative to body weights were heavier (P < 0.05) in RP- than in C-fed pigs (RP-I vs. C-I, +40%, and RP-IRA vs. C-IRA, +100%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Physiological data and relative organ weights in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich casein or pea diets for 3 wk1

 
    Plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Micro-hematocrits (data not shown), triacylglycerols, and plasma concentrations of phospholipids were not affected by treatments (Table 3). The plasma total cholesterol concentration was markedly decreased by the RP diet (P < 0.001), but not by surgery. This decrease resulted from a decrease in LDL cholesterol concentration, which was higher in I pigs (–35%) than in IRA pigs (–7%) (Table 3). The HDL cholesterol concentration was not modified by the treatments. The LDL to HDL cholesterol ratios in IRA pigs fed C or RP diets were 31% (P = 0.37) and 20% lower (P = 0.20), respectively, than in their intact controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Plasma and lipoprotein lipid concentrations in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich casein or pea diets for 3 wk1

 
    Liver lipids, enzymatic activities and LDL receptor abundance. Hepatic esterified cholesterol concentrations were almost 50% lower (P < 0.001) in RP- than in C-fed pigs, but other liver lipids did not differ (Table 4). HMG CoA reductase activity was 2-fold higher (P < 0.01) in RP-than in C-fed pigs. CYP27A1 activity was not modified by diet but surgery tended to decrease it (P = 0.07). Finally, the LDL receptor level was 1.6-fold higher (P < 0.01) in RP- than in C-fed pigs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Liver lipid concentrations, enzymatic activities of HMG CoA reductase, CYP7A1, and CYP27A1, and LDL receptor abundance in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich casein or pea diets for 3 wk1

 
    Biliary lipids and bile acids. Compared with the C diet, the RP diet significantly increased (P < 0.001) the gallbladder bile cholesterol and bile acid concentrations (P < 0.05; Table 5). As usual in pigs, the cholic acid pathway of biosynthesis was not effective. The RP diet modified only the hyocholic concentration in biliary bile, whereas IRA markedly influenced the gallbladder bile acid composition. Hyocholic acid, the 6{alpha}-hydroxylated derivative of chenodeoxycholic acid, was the major primary bile acid and was markedly increased (P < 0.01) by the RP diet and by the surgery. The cecum-colon by-pass markedly reduced (P < 0.01) the secondary bile acids, mainly hyodeoxycholic acid, leading to an increase (P < 0.001) in the primary to secondary bile acid ratio. The hydrophobic bile acid fraction of the total bile acids (chenodeoxycholic, deoxycholic, lithocholic, 3{alpha}-hydroxy-6-oxo-5ß-cholanoic, 7-oxo-lithocholic acids and other ketones), which represented ~33% of these acids, was not modified by diet or surgery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5 Biliary lipid and total and individual bile acid concentrations in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich casein or pea diets for 3 wk1

 
Lithogenic indices were not affected by treatments, either when calculated by the method of Thomas and Hofmann (40) (C-I, 0.34 ± 0.08; C-IRA, 0.44 ± 0.08; RP-I, 0.52 ± 0.08; RP-IRA, 0.52 ± 0.05) or by the method of Carey (41) (C-I, 0.56 ± 0.13; C-IRA, 0.78 ± 0.16; RP-I, 0.82 ± 0.12; RP-IRA, 0.80 ± 0.04).

    Fecal and ileal digesta steroid output. Diet and IRA did not modify the daily total neutral sterol and cholesterol output of the pigs (Table 6), but surgery markedly reduced (P < 0.01) the cholesterol microbial transformation into coprostanol and epicoprostanol. The same pattern was observed in the microbial transformation of dietary ß-sitosterol (data not shown). The daily total bile acid output was 1.4- and 2.5-fold higher (P < 0.01) in RP-I and RP-IRA than in C-I and C-IRA pigs, respectively. However, surgery drastically reduced (P < 0.01) the fecal excretion of bile acids, which represented ~32% of that of I pigs. Primary bile acid (chenodeoxycholic and hyocholic) output was almost 5-fold higher in RP- than in C-fed pigs, primarily because of higher (P < 0.01) hyocholic acid output in the I pigs. The bulk of the bile acid output was mainly secondary bile acids, which represented 75 and 90% of the total bile acids in RP- and C-fed pigs, respectively. Surgery markedly reduced the microbial transformation of bile acids. Hyodeoxycholic acid output, the main secondary bile acid, was lower (P < 0.01) in IRA than in I pigs, representing 20 and 59%, respectively, of the total bile acids. As a result, the primary to secondary bile acid output ratio was markedly increased (P < 0.01) in IRA pigs. Finally, the total neutral and acidic steroid output was ~50% higher (P < 0.05) in RP- than in C-fed pigs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6 Fecal and ileal digesta neutral and acidic steroid output in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich casein or pea diets for 3 wk1

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This study examined the effects of a pea seed-based diet and of the cecum-colon by-pass on cholesterol metabolism and steroid output in hypercholesterolemic growing pigs. The pigs remained in good health throughout the study, but diet and surgery influenced the physiological data. Daily weight gain was higher in RP- than in C-fed pigs, possibly due to the higher daily food intake and N retention in those pigs. Surgery reduced the growth performance of IRA compared with I pigs, probably as a result of a slightly lower food intake and lower energy digestibility [data previously published (42)].

The cholesterolemia in pigs fed the cholesterol-rich C diet was 52% higher than that in similar crossbred pigs fed a diet with no added cholesterol (2.64 ± 0.08 mmol/L, unpublished data) but close to that reported in pigs fed a 3 g/kg cholesterol-rich diet (28). Compared with the C diet, the RP diet lowered the plasma total cholesterol (–22%) through a reduction in LDL cholesterol (–24%). Similar results were observed by feeding pea seeds in cholesterol-free (43) and cholesterol-rich diets to rats (4,43,44) and pigs (19), or pea fiber to normocholesterolemic humans (45). The LDL cholesterol reduction could result from a lower LDL synthesis (by conversion of VLDL into LDL or by LDL hepatic synthesis) and/or from an increased LDL catabolism (1,46). The latter process was likely involved in the observed hypocholesterolemic effect because the hepatic LDL receptor activity was 1.6-fold higher in RP- than in C-fed pigs.

The dietary cholesterol intake was very similar among the 4 groups. Cholesterol synthesis in C-fed pigs (assayed by hepatic HMG CoA reductase activity) did not differ from that observed in pigs fed a cholesterol-rich diet, although it was lower than that in pigs fed a cholesterol-free diet (28). Compared with the C-fed pigs, there was a 2-fold higher HMG CoA reductase activity in pigs fed the RP diet. The elimination of neutral sterols did not differ among dietary treatments. This elimination was also not affected by the cecum-colon by-pass, confirming that the cholesterol absorption occurs largely in the small intestine. Meanwhile, the bile acid output was 1.6-fold higher in RP- than in C-fed pigs. This increase was probably modulated by undigested components such as the pea soluble nonstarch polysaccharides (NSPs), through bile acid binding affinities or sequestration in gels (47,48). The 50% higher hemicellulose intake (calculated as the difference between NDF and acid detergent fiber intake) in RP-fed pigs supports this suggestion. Other pea bioactive components such as saponins and their high content of resistant starch [reviewed by Guillon and Champ (49)] could also have had a role in the increased bile acid output. The fecal output of bile acids may have been balanced by their hepatic synthesis from cholesterol (50). This seems to agree with the lower hepatic cholesterol storage, the upregulation of the LDL receptor, and the higher HMG CoA reductase activity in the RP-fed pigs.

Our data showed that the higher bile acid output in RP- than in C-fed pigs was not associated with increased bile acid synthesis (as estimated by the activities of CYP7A1 and CYP27A1). Nevertheless, the activity of hepatic CYP4A21, one of the key enzymes in bile acid synthesis in pigs, was not measured in this study. This enzyme is involved in the 6{alpha}-hydroxylation of the chenodeoxycholic into hyocholic acid (51) and its activity in the RP-fed pigs could have been increased, as suggested by: 1) the 50% higher biliary content in hyocholic acid; and 2) the 6-fold higher elimination of this bile acid in the feces. This discrepancy between output and synthesis of bile acids is probably an artifact that resulted from not measuring the activity of CYP4A21. Moreover, the by-pass of the cecum-colon, a site of free bile acid absorption (52), should have increased the fecal output of bile acids as observed with the RP diet. Yet, IRA pigs unexpectedly excreted less bile acids than did I pigs. This reduction in the output of bile acids could have been due to their higher small intestinal absorption or to a decrease in their hepatic synthesis. This latter proposal was not supported by the activities of CYP7A1 and CYP27A1, which were similar in IRA and I pigs. Therefore, surgery probably influenced the reabsorption of bile acids through morphometric changes in the small intestinal mucosa, as previously suggested by Laplace (53). In fact, compared with I pigs, IRA pigs had an increased absorptive area in the mid-distal section of the small intestine [see (42)], a section in which bile acid reabsorption is very important (52,54). This reabsorption in IRA pigs could have been strengthened by 2 factors: 1) a higher content of trihydroxylated hyocholic acid, which is actively absorbed in the intestine (55), and 2) a lower effect of the microflora on bile acids, reducing their deconjugation and dehydroxylation and thus increasing their absorption by the intestinal bile acid transporter (56). Moreover, the RP diet and its resistant starch content could also have helped in stimulating the bile acid reabsorption as observed in rats fed amylomaize starch (57). In terms of sterol balance, the difference between the daily cholesterol input and output could represent the amount of cholesterol deposited daily in tissues (30). Taking into account the daily cholesterol intake, the estimated rate of cholesterol synthesis was higher overall in the RP- than in the C-fed pigs. These calculations, although based on theoretical assumptions, support the higher steroid output and HMG CoA reductase activity observed in the legume-fed pigs. The 50% higher total neutral and acidic steroid daily output in RP- than in C-fed pigs could thus explain the hypocholesterolemic effect of the pea diet. In fact, as previously observed by Férézou et al. (28), a 100% increase in the steroid output was required to reduce the plasma cholesterol by 50%.

The mechanisms by which the pea seeds influenced the steroid metabolism were not confined to the increased bile acid output. In fact, the RP-fed pigs had a biliary bile acid concentration 40% higher than the C-fed pigs. These pigs, food-deprived for 10 h before slaughter, probably had the majority of their bile acid pool in the gallbladder, as observed previously in hamsters (58). Therefore, when estimating the gallbladder bile acid pool at slaughter, this pool was 1.5-fold higher in the RP group than in the C group (14.4 vs. 5.8 mmol, respectively). This effect, also observed in humans consuming legume-based diets (59), could have been due to a higher intestinal bile acid absorption rate in the RP-fed pigs, probably due to the same mechanisms (higher absorptive area and bile content in hyocholic acid) previously suggested for the increased intestinal bile acid reabsorption in IRA pigs. The negligible effect of this enlarged bile acid pool on hepatic acidic steroid synthesis, which is modulated by hydrophobic bile acids (24), could be due to the predominantly hydrophilic bile acid profile of pigs.

Both diets induced similar microbial transformations of cholesterol and ß-sitosterol, as determined in feces. In the RP-I and C-I pigs, the microbial transformation of cholesterol (11 and 16% of the total neutral sterols, respectively) and ß-sitosterol (24 and 32% of the total ß-sitosterol) was low. This fact may have been because the microflora were encompassed by an excess of cholesterol in the intestinal lumen, as previously observed in pigs fed cholesterol-rich diets (28,30). Surgery almost completely prevented the microbial transformation of cholesterol and ß-sitosterol. The reduction in microbial transformation of bile acids was not as high as that for cholesterol, but it was nevertheless very important. In fact, the secondary bile acids of the RP-IRA and C-IRA pigs reached 45 and 62% of the total bile acid output and represented 7 and 10% of the biliary bile acids, respectively. These results agree with those reported in ileoanal anastomosed patients (60) and suggest that the distal part of the small intestine of our pigs had a microbial population that was able to deconjugate and dehydroxylate bile acids.

Cecum and colon by-pass did not modify cholesterol metabolism even though it reduced the microbial transformation of steroids and probably exerted a trophic effect on the small intestinal epithelium. Thus, under the conditions here, the role of the hindgut in cholesterol metabolism was negligible. In contrast, feeding whole pea seeds to pigs for 3 wk reduced plasma cholesterol, probably through 2 mechanisms: 1) a higher bile acid output, most likely modulated by pea undigested components (soluble NSP, resistant starch, and saponins); and 2) an increased hydrophilic bile acid pool. These 2 different effects are the result of the highly complex pea composition; further studies of the fractioned legume’s bioactive components will be pursued to understand their mode of action more fully.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Sanipec Lda for mixing the experimental diets, Drs. R. Mascarenhas and C. Lavrador for performing animal surgeries, B. Sousa for technical assistance, and Drs. C. Sérougne, M. Souidi, and C. Loison for excellent laboratory assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the PRAXIS XXI research programme (FCT, Lisboa, Portugal) and by ICAM (Évora, Portugal). Back

3 Abbreviations used: BW, body weight; C, casein; CYP7A1, cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase; CYP27A1, sterol 27-hydroxylase; HMG CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA; I, intact; IRA, ileorectal anastomosis; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; NSP, nonstarch polysaccharide; RP, raw pea seed; TTBS, Tween-Tris buffered saline. Back

Manuscript received 21 May 2004. Initial review completed 9 August 2004. Revision accepted 10 September 2004.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Kingman, S. M. (1991) The influence of legume seeds on human plasma lipid concentrations. Nutr. Res. Rev. 4:97-123.

2. Mathur, K. S., Singhal, S. S. & Sharma, R. D. (1964) Effect of Bengal gram on experimentally induced high levels of cholesterol in tissues and serum in albino rats. J. Nutr. 84:201-204.

3. Shutler, S. M., Walker, A. F. & Low, A. G. (1987) The cholesterol-lowering effects of legumes. I: Effects of the major nutrients. Hum. Nutr. Food Sci. Nutr. 41F:71-86.

4. Wang, Y.H.A. & McIntosh, G. H. (1996) Extrusion and boiling improve rat body weight gain and plasma cholesterol lowering ability of peas and chickpeas. J. Nutr. 126:3054-3062.

5. Adams, M. R., Golden, D. L., Anthony, M. S., Register, T. C. & Williams, J. K. (2002) The inhibitory effect of soy protein isolate on atherosclerosis in mice does not require the presence of LDL receptors or alteration of plasma lipoproteins. J. Nutr. 132:43-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Madani, S., Lopez, S., Blond, J., Prost, J. & Belleville, J. (1998) Highly purified soybean protein is not hypocholesterolemic in rats but stimulates cholesterol synthesis and excretion and reduces polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Nutr. 128:1084-1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Kim, D. N., Lee, K. T., Reiner, J. M. & Thomas, W. A. (1978) Effect of a soy protein product on serum and tissue cholesterol concentrations in swine fed high-fat, high-cholesterol diets. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 299:385-399.

8. Kritchevsky, D. (1979) Vegetable protein and atherosclerosis. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:135-146.[Medline]

9. Oakenfull, D. G. & Fenwick, D. E. (1978) Adsorption of bile salts from aqueous solutions by plant fibre and cholestyramine. Br. J. Nutr. 40:299-309.[Medline]

10. Sidhu, G. S., Upson, B. & Manilow, M. R. (1987) Effects of soy saponins and tigogenin cellobioside on intestinal uptake of cholesterol, cholate and glucose. Nutr. Rep. Int. 35:615-623.

11. Carr, T. P., Cornelison, R. M., Illston, B. J., Stuefer-Powell, C. L. & Gallaher, D. D. (2002) Plant sterols alter bile acid metabolism and reduce cholesterol absorption in hamsters fed a beef-based diet. Nutr. Res. 22:745-754.

12. Ikeda, I., Tanaka, K., Sugano, M., Vahouny, V. & Gallo, L. L. (1988) Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats by plant sterols. J. Lipid Res. 29:1573-1582.[Abstract]

13. Forsythe, W. A., Green, M. S. & Anderson, J. J. (1986) Dietary protein effects on cholesterol and lipoprotein concentrations: a review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 5:533-549.[Abstract]

14. Beynen, A. C., West, C. E., Spaaij, C.J.K., Huisman, J., Van Leeuwen, P., Schutte, J. B. & Hackeng, W.H.L. (1990) Cholesterol metabolism, digestion rates and postprandial changes in serum of swine fed purified diets containing either casein or soybean protein. J. Nutr. 120:422-430.

15. Duane, W. C. (1997) Effects of legume consumption on serum cholesterol, biliary lipids, and sterol metabolism in humans. J. Lipid Res. 38:1120-1128.[Abstract]

16. Kim, D. N., Lee, K. T., Reiner, J. M. & Thomas, W. A. (1980) Increased steroid excretion in swine fed high-fat, high-cholesterol diet with soy protein. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 33:25-35.[Medline]

17. Adsule, R. N., Lawande, K. M. & Kadam, S. S. (1989) Pea. Salunkhe, D. K. Kadam, S. S. eds. Handbook of World Food Legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processing Technology and Utilization 1989:215-251 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL. .

18. Juste, C., Catala, I., Auboiron, S., Fiszlewicz, M., Fenart, E., Peyronnet, C. & Corring, T. (1997) Effects of dietary proteins on serum and biliary lipids and on cholesterol precipitation from pig bile. Laplace, J. P. Février, C. Barbeau, A. eds. Proceedings of the VIIth International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs 1997:28-32 EAAP Publication 88 San Malo, France. .

19. Kingman, S. M., Walker, A. F., Low, A. G., Sambrook, I. E., Owen, R. W. & Cole, T. J. (1993) Comparative effects of four legume species on plasma lipids and faecal steroid excretion in hypercholesterolaemic pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 69:409-421.[Medline]

20. Dodds, W. J. (1982) The pig model for biomedical research. Fed. Proc. 41:247-256.

21. Chevallier, F. & Lutton, C. (1973) The intestine is the major site of cholesterol synthesis in the rat. Nat. New Biol. 242:61-62.[Medline]

22. Dietschy, J. M. & Wilson, J. D. (1970) Regulation of cholesterol metabolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 282:1128-1138.

23. Kellogg, T. F. (1971) Microbiological aspect of enterohepatic sterol and bile acid metabolism. Fed. Proc. 30:1808-1814.[Medline]

24. Pandak, W. M., Vlahcevic, Z. R., Heuman, D. M., Redford, K. S., Chiang, J. Y. & Hylemon, P. B. (1994) Effects of different bile salts on steady-state mRNA levels and transcriptional activity of cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase. Hepatology 19:941-947.[Medline]

25. Yamasmita, H., Kuroki, S. & Nakayama, F. (1989) An assay of cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase utilizing a silica cartridge column and 5{alpha}-cholesten-3ß,7ß-diol as an internal standard. J. Chromatogr. 496:255-268.[Medline]

26. Green, S. A. (1988) A note on amino acid digestibility measured in pigs with pre- or post-valve ileo-rectal anastomoses, fed soyabean, pea and meat meals. Anim. Prod. 47:317-320.

27. Grundy, S. M., Ahrens, E. H. & Miettinen, T. A. (1965) Quantitative isolation and gas liquid chromatography analysis of total fecal bile acids. J. Lipid Res. 6:397-410.[Abstract]

28. Férézou, J., Riottot, M., Sérougne, C., Cohen-Solal, C., Catala, I., Alquier, C., Parquet, M., Juste, C., Lafont, H., Mathé, D., Corring, T. & Lutton, C. (1997) Hypocholesterolemic action of ß-cyclodextrin and its effects o cholesterol metabolism in pigs fed a cholesterol-enriched diet. J. Lipid Res. 38:86-100.[Abstract]

29. Riottot, M., Olivier, P., Huet, A., Caboche, J. J., Parquet, M., Khallou, J. & Lutton, C. (1993) Hypolipidemic effects of ß-cyclodextrin in the hamster and in the genetically hypercholesterolemic Rico rat. Lipids 28:181-188.[Medline]

30. Marsh, A., Kim, D. N., Lee, K. T., Reiner, J. M. & Thomas, W. A. (1972) Cholesterol turnover, synthesis, and retention in hypercholesterolemic growing swine. J. Lipid Res. 13:600-615.[Abstract]

31. Nakamura, M., Tanigichi, Y., Yamamoto, M., Hino, K. & Manabe, M. (1997) Homogenous assay of serum LDL-cholesterol on an automatic analyzer. Clin. Chem. 43(suppl. 6):260-261.

32. Sugiuchi, H., Uji, Y., Okabe, H., Irie, T., Uekama, K., Kayahara, N. & Miyauchi, K. (1995) Direct measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulphated {alpha}-cyclodextrin. Clin. Chem. 41:717-723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Souidi, M., Parquet, M., Férézou, J. & Lutton, C. (1999) Modulation of cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase and sterol 27-hydroxylase activities by steroids and physiological conditions in the hamster liver. Life Sci. 64:1585-1593.[Medline]

34. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 192:265-275.

35. Philipp, B. W. & Shapiro, D. J. (1979) Improved method for the assay and activation of hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase. J. Lipid. Res. 20:588-593.[Abstract]

36. Souidi, M., Parquet, M. & Lutton, C. (1998) Improved assay of hepatic microsomal cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase activity by the use of hydroxypropyl ß-cyclodextrin and an NADPH-regenerating system. Clin. Chim. Acta 269:201-217.[Medline]

37. Kovanen, P. T., Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. (1979) Increased binding of low density lipoprotein to liver membranes from rats treated with 17{alpha}-ethinyl estradiol. J. Biol. Chem. 254:11367-11373.[Free Full Text]

38. Schneider, W. J., Beisiegel, U., Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. (1982) Purification of the low density lipoprotein receptor, an acidic glycoprotein of 164,000 molecular weight. J. Biol. Chem. 257:2664-2673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Turley, S. D. & Dietschy, J. M. (1978) Reevaluation of the 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase assay for total bile acids in bile. J. Lipid Res. 19:924-928.[Abstract]

40. Thomas, P. J. & Hofmann, A. F. (1973) Letter: A simple calculation of the lithogenic index of bile: expressing biliary lipid composition on rectangular coordinates. Gastroenterology 65:698-700.[Medline]

41. Carey, M. C. (1978) Critical tables for calculating the cholesterol saturation of native bile. J. Lipid Res. 19:945-956.[Abstract]

42. Salgado, P., Martins, J. M., Carvalho, F., Abreu, M., Freire, J.P.B., Toullec, R., Lalles, J. P. & Bento, O. (2002) Component digestibility of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) and pea (Pisum sativum) seeds and effects on the small intestine and body organs in anastomosed and intact growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 98:187-201.

43. Jacques, H., Deshaies, Y. & Savoie, L. (1986) Relationship between dietary proteins, their in vitro digestion products, and serum cholesterol in rats. Atherosclerosis 61:89-98.[Medline]

44. Alonso, R., Grant, G. & Marzo, F. (2001) Thermal treatment improves nutritional quality of pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.) without reducing their hypocholesterolemic properties. Nutr. Res. 21:1067-1077.[Medline]

45. Dubois, C., Cara, L., Armand, M., Borel, P., Senft, M., Portugal, H., Pauli, A. M., Bernard, P. M., Lafont, H. & Lairon, D. (1993) Effects of pea and soybean fibre on postprandial lipaemia and lipoproteins in healthy adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 47:508-520.[Medline]

46. Huff, M. W. & Telford, D. E. (1985) Direct synthesis of low-density lipoprotein apoprotein B in the miniature pig. Metabolism 34:36-42.[Medline]

47. Kay, R. M. & Truswell, A. S. (1977) Effect of citrus pectin on blood lipids and fecal steroid excretion in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 30:171-175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Kritchevsky, D. & Story, J. A. (1974) Binding of bile salts in vitro by non-nutritive fiber. J. Nutr. 104:458-462.

49. Guillon, F. & Champ, M. M. (2002) Carbohydrate fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition and potential for health. Br. J. Nutr. 88:S293-S306.

50. Lindstedt, S. (1957) The turnover of bile acids in the rat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 38:121-128.

51. Lundell, K., Hansson, R. & Wikvall, K. (2001) Cloning and expression of a pig liver taurochenodeoxycholic acid 6{alpha}-hydroxylase (CYP4A21). A novel member of the CYP4A subfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 276:9606-9612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Schiff, E. R., Small, N. C. & Dietschy, J. M. (1972) Characterization of the kinetics of the passive and active transport mechanisms for bile acid absorption in the small intestine and colon of the rat. J. Clin. Investig. 51:1351-1362.

53. Laplace, J. P. (1975) Somatic and visceral growth, and adiposity in the pig after partial small bowel resection. I. Variations according to the kinds of operations, to the specific location along the intestinal tract and to the sex of the animals. Ann. Rech. Vet. 6:265-288.[Medline]

54. Juste, C., Legrand-Defretin, V., Corring, T. & Rerat, A. (1988) Intestinal absorption of bile acids in the pig. Role of distal bowel. Dig. Dis. Sci. 33:67-73.[Medline]

55. Hofmann, A. F. (1988) Bile acids. Arias, I. M. Jacoby, W. B. Popper, H. Schachter, D. Shafritz, D. A. eds. The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology 1988:553-572 Raven Press New York, NY. .

56. Love, M. W. & Dawson, P. A. (1998) New insights into bile acid transport. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9:225-229.[Medline]

57. Riottot, M. & Sacquet, E. (1985) Increase in the ileal absorption rate of sodium taurocholate in germ-free and conventional rats given an amylomaize diet. Br. J. Nutr. 53:307-310.[Medline]

58. Miettinen, T. A. (1973) Clinical implications of bile acid metabolism in man. Nair, P. P. Kritchevsky, D. eds. The Bile Acids. Vol. 2: Physiology and Metabolism 1973:191-247 Plenum Press New York, NY. .

59. Nervi, F., Covarrubias, C., Bravo, P., Velasco, N., Ulloa, N., Cruz, F., Fava, M., Severin, C., Del Pozo, R., Antezana, C., Valdivieso, V. & Arteaga, A. (1989) Influence of legume intake on biliary lipids and cholesterol saturation in young Chilean men. Identification of a dietary risk factor for cholesterol gallstone formation in a highly prevalent area. Gastroenterology 96:825-830.[Medline]

60. Hakala, K., Vuoristo, M., Luukkonen, P., Jarvinen, H. J. & Miettinen, T. A. (1997) Impaired absorption of cholesterol and bile acids in patients with an ileoanal anastomosis. Gut 41:771-777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
A. Viveros, C. Centeno, I. Arija, and A. Brenes
Cholesterol-Lowering Effects of Dietary Lupin (Lupinus albus var Multolupa) in Chicken Diets
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2007; 86(12): 2631 - 2638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. M. Martins, M. Riottot, M. C. de Abreu, A. M. Viegas-Crespo, M. J. Lanca, J. A. Almeida, J. B. Freire, and O. P. Bento
Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1539 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bento, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martins, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bento, O. P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition