Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greany, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurzer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greany, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurzer, M. S.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:3277-3283, December 2004


Human Nutrition and Metabolism

Probiotic Consumption Does Not Enhance the Cholesterol-Lowering Effect of Soy in Postmenopausal Women1,2

Kristin A. Greany, Jennifer A. Nettleton, Kerry E. Wangen, William Thomas* and Mindy S. Kurzer3

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 and * Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55407

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mkurzer{at}umn.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Numerous studies report that soy lowers cholesterol. Probiotic bacteria were also reported to lower total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). We hypothesized that by altering intestinal microflora, probiotic consumption may also change phytoestrogen metabolism and enhance the effects of soy. To evaluate the independent and interactive effects of probiotic bacteria and soy on plasma TC, LDL-C, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG), 37 women with a baseline TC of 5.24 mmol/L were given the following 4 treatments for 6 wk each in a randomized crossover design: soy protein isolate (26 ± 5 g soy protein containing 44 ± 8 mg isoflavones/d); soy protein isolate + probiotic capsules (109 colony-forming units Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium longum); milk protein isolate (26 ± 5 g milk protein/d); and milk protein isolate + probiotic. Soy consumption decreased plasma TC by 2.2% (P = 0.02) and LDL-C by 3.5% (P = 0.005), increased HDL-C by 4.2% (P = 0.006) and tended to decrease TG (P = 0.07) compared with milk protein intake. When divided according to initial TC concentration, soy effects were observed only in hypercholesterolemic women (TC > 5.17 mmol/L). In this subgroup, soy treatments decreased plasma TC by 3.3% (P = 0.01), LDL-C by 4.5% (P = 0.004), and TG by 10.6% (P = 0.02), and increased HDL-C by 4.2% (P = 0.02). When subjects were divided on the basis of plasma and urine concentrations of the isoflavone metabolite, equol, equol producers and nonproducers did not differ in baseline lipids or in the effects of soy. Probiotics did not lower cholesterol or enhance the effects of soy. These results confirm a beneficial effect of soy on plasma cholesterol in mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women independent of equol production status, but do not support an independent or additive effect of these particular probiotic bacteria.


KEY WORDS: • soy protein • isoflavones • probiotic bacteria • lipids • women

Coronary heart disease (CHD)4 is the leading cause of death in the United States, accounting for >502,000 deaths in 2001 (1). Considerable research has been devoted to the investigation of pharmaceutical and lifestyle interventions for primary and secondary prevention. Over the past 3 decades, soy-based foods and soy isoflavones have emerged as a viable adjunct for controlling plasma lipids and other CHD risk factors.

A 1995 meta-analysis of 38 trials (2) as well as numerous recent intervention studies (313) demonstrated a hypocholesterolemic effect of soy, although a few investigations (1417) did not corroborate these results. Several components of soy were hypothesized to contribute to its effect on plasma lipid concentrations. These components include storage peptides (3,18), saponins (19), and isoflavones (5,20,21). If isoflavones are responsible for the effects of soy on HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), enhancing their absorption and metabolism to active forms may increase their therapeutic potential.

The isoflavone metabolite, equol, is of particular interest. Equol binds with greater affinity to the estrogen receptor than its precursor daidzein; therefore, it may have greater efficacy than other isoflavones in receptor-mediated effects of soy (22). It was suggested that the inconsistent clinical effectiveness of soy may be mediated by individual variation in the ability to produce equol (30–40% of humans produce large quantities of equol after soy consumption) and that in analyzing results, subjects should be stratified by equol production status (2326). A recently published investigation reported significant reductions in total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and triglycerides (TG) for the subset of equol producers, but no significant differences for the group overall (27).

Intestinal bacteria perform critical roles in isoflavone metabolism (28). Provision of probiotic bacteria may modulate gut microflora, thereby augmenting isoflavone metabolism and increasing the effect on lipids. In addition, probiotic bacteria may independently affect plasma lipids. Studies incorporating probiotic bacteria into fermented food products (2932) or capsules (33) reported a cholesterol-lowering effect, although not all investigations support this outcome (3437).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the independent and interactive effects of soy protein isolate and probiotic bacteria on plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. We hypothesized that the probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS+1 and Bifidobacterium longum would augment the effect of soy on plasma lipids as well as exert an independent hypocholesterolemic effect when administered in the absence of soy protein, and that the effect of soy on plasma lipids would be more pronounced in women who were equol producers.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Subject screening and selection. This study was part of a larger investigation evaluating the effects of soy and probiotic consumption on plasma isoflavones and reproductive hormones (38). To examine the hypotheses of the larger investigation, the following 2 groups of postmenopausal women were targeted for participation: 1) women with a history of breast cancer not treated with chemotherapy and 2) women with no family history of breast cancer and no personal history of any reproductive cancer. Subjects between 40 and 70 y were recruited from the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. Exclusionary criteria for the study included the following: menstrual period within the last year, follicle-stimulating hormone concentration < 35 IU/L, hormonal therapy (hormone replacement, Tamoxifen, Raloxifen, topical progesterone cream, steroids, thyroid replacement), oral antibiotics within the past 3 mo, current use of hypocholesterolemic agents, BMI < 18 or > 36 kg/m2, weight change > 6.8 kg during the past year, and current tobacco use. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Minnesota and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. All subjects gave written, informed consent before participation in the study.

    Study design and experimental diet. The study was conducted in a randomized crossover design. Subjects completed four 6-wk diet treatments separated by 2-wk washout periods; the entire study duration was 8 mo. The length of the washout period was considered sufficient for preventing residual effects of protein isolate or probiotic on subsequent diet periods. Participants were free-living and consumed their habitual diets (with restrictions as noted) supplemented by 1 of the following 4 treatment combinations during each of the 4 diet periods: 1) soy protein isolate, 2) soy protein isolate plus probiotic capsules, 3) milk protein isolate, and 4) milk protein isolate plus probiotic capsules. Protein isolates were obtained from the Solae Company. The soy powder was made with SUPROSOY (part of the Solae brand) isolated soy protein that had been water washed to retain the naturally occurring isoflavones. The isoflavone content of both powders was analyzed before and halfway through the study by HPLC (Dr. Pat Murphy, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA). Expressed as aglycone equivalents, soy protein isolate contained 1.16 mg isoflavones/g powder (57% genistein, 34% daidzein, 9% glycitein); the milk protein isolate was devoid of isoflavones. The protein isolates were provided relative to body weight (wt) to supply 0.38 g protein/kg body wt (26 ± 5 g/d); soy protein provided 0.64 mg isoflavones/kg body wt (44 ± 8 mg isoflavones/d). The nutrient content of the protein isolates was similar but not identical (Table 1). To prevent weight gain and large macronutrient alterations from the habitual diet, women were encouraged to substitute the protein isolates for protein-containing foods. Subjects were instructed to consume the daily allotment of powder divided in 2 doses to minimize side effects and maximize potential biological effects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Daily nutrient and isoflavone contribution of soy protein isolate and milk protein isolate1

 
Probiotic capsules consisted of a commercially available product (DDS Plus; UAS Laboratories). Three probiotic capsules containing a total of 109 colony-forming units (cfu) of Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS+1 and Bifidobacterium longum and 15–30 mg fructooligosaccharide were consumed each morning. Microbiological evaluation of the capsule contents at the beginning and midpoint of the study were conducted to verify bacterial content (Dr. Joellen Feirtag, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota).

Subjects were instructed to abstain from soy or isoflavone food products (including foods containing soy protein, soy concentrate, soy hydrolysate but excluding soybean oil and soy lecithin), fermented dairy foods, flaxseed, alcoholic beverages, herbal or isoflavone supplements, and vitamin/mineral supplements containing >100% of the Daily Value for any nutrient. In addition, intake of legumes, sprouts, and nondairy pickled/fermented foods was limited to 1 serving/wk. Subjects recorded their powder and capsule consumption and compliance with study restrictions on individualized calendars. Capsules bottles were collected at the end of each diet period and the number of capsules remaining documented.

    Data collection. As described previously (38), blood samples were obtained after a 12- to 14-h fast on d 1 of the first diet period (baseline) and on d 1 of the washout period after each diet period. All samples were drawn between 0600 and 1000 h; samples for an individual subject were obtained at the same time ± 30 min throughout the study. Blood was drawn into tubes containing EDTA, and plasma separated by centrifugation for 10 min at 5°C and 2000 x g. Aprotinin and sodium azide were added to final concentrations of 1 mg/L and 1 g/L, respectively. Plasma aliquots were frozen at –70°C until analysis.

Subjects kept detailed diet records for the 3 d preceding the first diet period (representing baseline) and for the final 3 d of each diet period. Food records were reviewed with each subject by study coordinators immediately upon submission and analyzed using Nutritionist V version 2.1 (First DataBank, Hearst Corporation). Anthropometric data collection included body composition [estimated by skinfolds at baseline (39)] and weight (measured at baseline, and at the midpoint and end of each diet period).

    Sample Analysis. Plasma concentrations of TC and TG were determined using commercially available reagents (Cholesterol/HP and Triglyceride/GB; Roche Diagnostics) with an enzymatic colorimetric method previously adapted for microtiter plates (40). Cholesterol standards were prepared as dilutions of a stock solution (Cholesterol Calibrator 200 mg/dL; Sigma Chemical) and TG standards were created from a stock solution of oil with t-octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol added for solubility (Triton X-100, Sigma Chemical). HDL-C was isolated by selective precipitation of apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic acid (6.1 mmol/L;Fischer Scientific) and magnesium chloride (20 mmol/L; Fischer Scientific). The resulting supernatant was analyzed for cholesterol content using the plasma cholesterol enzymatic assay. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald equation (41): LDL-C = TC – HDL-C – (TG/5). All samples from each subject were assayed in duplicate on the same day with a high and a low in-house plasma control and a standard curve on each plate. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 60 min before being read at 490 nm with an automated microplate reader (HTS-7000 Plus; Perkin Elmer). Interassay variability was 2% and intra-assay variability was <2% for TC, HDL-C, and TG. Plasma and urinary equol were analyzed by a competitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay as described previously (42); 8 of 37 subjects demonstrated equol production capacity in both tests (38).

    Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using SAS version 8.2 (SAS Institute). Results are expressed as least-squares mean ± SEM. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Two-sample t tests were employed to compare groups at baseline (normocholesterolemic vs. hypercholesterolemic, equol producers vs. nonproducers) and to compare plasma isoflavone concentrations in the women when they consumed the soy diet and the soy + probiotic diet to evaluate the effect of probiotic. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine associations among plasma isoflavones and lipids during the diets. Repeated-measures ANOVA with F-tests based on between-subject variability was used to compare groups within the study. The effects of diet order on lipids, interactions between diet treatments, and differences in plasma lipids and nutrition intake between the diet treatments and between diet treatments and baseline were also evaluated with repeated-measures ANOVA with F-tests based on within-subject variability. Plasma lipids did not change significantly over sequential diet periods; thus, time was not included as an adjusting variable in primary endpoint analyses.

Data from 37 subjects were included in the analyses: 33 completed all diet periods, 3 completed 3 periods, and 1 completed 2 diet periods. There was no interaction between the soy and probiotic treatments. To evaluate the effect of protein isolate treatment, the 4 diets were consolidated into 2 on the basis of the protein isolate consumed (soy diets: soy and soy + probiotic; milk diets: milk and milk + probiotic). For probiotic treatment comparisons, the diets were collapsed into 2 on the basis of the use of probiotic capsules (probiotic diets: soy + probiotic and milk + probiotic; diets without probiotic: soy and milk).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Subject characteristics. On the basis of plasma TC concentrations at the initial screening, subjects were characterized as mildly hypercholesterolemic (TC 5.17–6.59 mmol/L, 200–255 mg/dL) or normocholesterolemic (TC <5.17 mmol/L, <200 mg/dL); 25 subjects were mildly hypercholesterolemic and 12 were normocholesterolemic. With the exception of waist:hip ratio, baseline anthropometric characteristics did not differ between these 2 groups (Table 2). As anticipated, plasma TC and LDL-C were higher (P < 0.001) at baseline in mildly hypercholesterolemic than in normocholesterolemic women. HDL-C did not differ between the 2 groups, although concentrations for the hypercholesterolemic group tended to be higher (P = 0.09). Baseline lipid concentrations in equol producers compared with nonproducers did not differ except for a trend for higher HDL-C in producers (P = 0.09).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Baseline characteristics and plasma lipid concentrations of normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women1, 2

 
    Dietary intake. Comparisons between baseline nutrient intake (representative of unrestricted habitual diet before the study) and intake during the soy and milk diet periods showed a small decrease in fiber intake (P = 0.004) and a 20-g increase in protein intake (P < 0.0001) during the study (Table 3). However, there were no significant differences in intake of energy or macronutrients from soy protein diets and milk protein diets. Adherence to the diet intervention and restrictions (as assessed by diet records, returned capsule counts, and study calendars kept by subjects) was good.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Daily dietary intake of normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women at baseline and after 6 wk of consuming milk or soy protein diets with or without probiotic capsules1

 
    Effects of soy protein isolate. In the entire group, consumption of soy protein isolate affected all lipid endpoints (Table 4). Plasma TC was 2.2% lower (P = 0.02), LDL-C was 3.5% lower (P = 0.005), HDL-C was 4.2% higher (P = 0.006), the TC:HDL-C ratio was 5.4% lower (P < 0.0001), and the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio was 6.3% lower (P < 0.0001) during the soy diet compared with the milk diet periods. TG tended to be lower (–8.8%) during the soy compared with the milk diet periods (P = 0.07).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women after 6 wk of consuming milk or soy protein diets with or without probiotic capsules1

 
When evaluated separately, the lipid concentrations of the 12 normocholesterolemic subjects differed by only 1–2% and none of the differences were significant (Table 4). In contrast, soy affected all lipid variables in the 25 hypercholesterolemic participants (Table 4). Plasma TC was 3.3% lower (P = 0.01) and LDL-C was 4.5% lower (P = 0.004) during soy than milk diet periods. HDL-C was 4.2% higher during soy administration (P = 0.02). TG was 10.6% lower during soy than milk diet periods (P = 0.02). The TC:HDL-C ratio and the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio were 6.7 and 7.6% lower, respectively, during soy treatments (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons).

There were no significant correlations between individual plasma isoflavones and any lipid endpoints. Differences in plasma TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG between soy and milk diet periods were not correlated with plasma concentrations of any individual isoflavone or total isoflavones. In addition, plasma isoflavone concentrations were not correlated with any lipid endpoints during either soy diet period. Furthermore, the effects of soy consumption on lipids in all subjects, hypercholesterolemic subjects alone, or normocholesterolemic subjects alone, did not differ between equol producers and nonproducers (data not shown).

In addition to differences between soy and milk treatments, changes in lipid variables occurred between baseline and intervention diet periods in the entire group (Fig. 1). Plasma TC (–5.0%; P = 0.003) and LDL-C (–6.1%; P = 0.002) differed between baseline and soy diet periods. HDL-C did not change from baseline; consequently, the TC:HDL-C and the LDL-C:HDL-C ratios were lower during soy diet periods than at baseline (TC:HDL-C, –3.6%; P = 0.02, LDL-C:HDL-C, –4.6%; P = 0.009). In contrast, plasma TC decreased 2.6% (P = 0.03), LDL-C tended to decrease (–2.4%; P = 0.06) and HDL-C did not change from baseline after consumption of the milk diets, resulting in unchanged TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C ratios. Plasma TG concentrations did not differ between baseline and either the soy of milk diet periods.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1 The percentage difference from baseline in plasma concentrations of TC, HDL-C, TG, and LDL-C and the ratios of TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C in normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women after 6 wk of consuming milk or soy protein diets with or without probiotic capsules. Values are means ± SEM, n = 37 (baseline), 72 (milk), or 71 (soy diet). Asterisks indicate different from baseline: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

 
    Effect of probiotic capsules. Probiotic treatments did not affect any lipid endpoint (Table 4). Differences between probiotic diet treatments and diet treatments without probiotic were small and were not significant. Probiotic consumption did not influence plasma isoflavones (38). Concentrations of individual isoflavones and total plasma isoflavones did not differ between the soy and the soy + probiotic diet periods (38).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In this study, we confirmed previous reports of the hypocholesterolemic effects of soy consumption, although the magnitude of change in TC and LDL-C observed in this study was less than the overall 9 and 13% decreases reported in the 1995 meta-analysis (2). However, when the results of the meta-analysis were stratified by baseline cholesterol, the normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects had only a 3–4% decrease in TC. This is similar to the effect in our subjects, although mean soy protein intake in our study was 26 vs. 47 g in the meta-analysis. These comparable findings suggest that consuming soy protein in excess of 26 g/d may not provide additional benefit on plasma lipids.

The majority of recently published soy interventions including mildly or moderately hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women (3,5,1013) support the hypocholesterolemic role of soy found in this study, although a few investigations did not report decreases in TC and/or LDL-C after soy consumption (16,17). The effect of soy on HDL-C and TG has been less consistent. Although several studies in postmenopausal women (3,11,13) showed an increase in HDL-C as found in this study, others (10,12,16,17) have not reported a significant change in HDL-C. Similarly, the reported effect of soy on TG varied from a decrease (11,43), consistent with our results, to no effect (10,12,16,17).

Our results suggest that the cholesterol-lowering effect of soy is limited to hypercholesterolemic subjects. When examined separately, normocholesterolemic women in this study showed no response to soy treatment. This observation is in agreement with the majority of results reported for subsets or samples of normocholesterolemic subjects (5,14) but contradicts isolated reports of a hypocholesterolemic effect in normocholesterolemic men (4) and women (8).

When the results of this study were stratified according to equol producer status, equol producers and nonproducers did not differ in baseline lipid values or the effects of soy consumption. Although the small number of equol producers (8 of 37) may have limited the power to detect differences, Meyer et al. (27) did find lipid-lowering effects in a small subset of equol producers (8 of 23 subjects). These inconsistent results may be due to different soy products (soy protein isolate vs. whole bean soy milk), a lower isoflavone dose in this study, or different definitions of an equol producer.

This investigation did not find a beneficial effect of consumption of Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium longum on plasma lipids. The lack of effect may be due to subject characteristics, dose of bacteria, mode of administration, or the species/strain employed. The ability of probiotic bacteria to lower cholesterol appears to depend in part on the initial cholesterol concentration. With the exception of one study (31), baseline TC in studies that demonstrated a hypocholesterolemic effect were >5.68 mmol/L (29,30,32). In contrast, baseline TC in all but one (36) of the studies that did not show a hypocholesterolemic effect (34,35,37) was between 5.35 and 5.68 mmol/L, similar to the baseline TC in this study.

Probiotic bacteria were provided at 109 cfu/d in this study, a dose comparable to the amount provided in studies demonstrating a hypocholesterolemic effect with fermented milk products (2932). Although it is difficult to ascertain whether the quantity of bacteria present in the gut was sufficient for a hypocholesterolemic effect, analyses of fecal microflora in this study demonstrated an increase in Bifidobacteria after probiotic consumption (personal communication, Dr. Joellen Feirtag, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota).

This study provided probiotic bacteria via capsules to improve ease of distribution and avoid requiring women to consume study-related foods in addition to the protein powder. However, a dairy medium appears to be the most efficacious route of administering probiotic bacteria. The majority of studies employing fermented milk/yogurt products demonstrated a hypocholesterolemic effect (2932), compared with the lack of success in placebo-controlled studies using nondairy foods (35) or capsules (37) as a vehicle.

Finally, the ability of bacteria to exert a cholesterol-lowering effect appears to be a species- and strain-specific trait. In placebo-controlled trials using fermented milk products or capsules, some strains (31) of Lactobacillus acidophilus exerted a cholesterol-lowering effect, whereas other strains (34,36,37) were not effective. Similarly, a fermented milk product containing Bifidobacterium longum BL1 lowered total cholesterol (32), whereas a milk product fermented with Bifidobacterium longum 913 and Lactobacillus acidophilus 145 did not alter TC but increased HDL-C (36). Therefore, it is possible that the strains of Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus used in this study may not have hypocholesterolemic properties.

The results of this study confirm a favorable effect of soy on plasma lipids regardless of equol producer status, but do not support independent effects of the probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS+1 and Bifidobacterium longum. In addition, consumption of these bacteria did not appear to augment the effects of soy consumption. Continued research is warranted to elucidate the quantitative contributions of the active components in soy, to determine the effect of equol producer status, and to establish an optimal dose of soy for maximal effectiveness and adherence.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the study participants for their time and commitment, the staff of the University of Minnesota General Clinical Research Center for assistance with sample procurement and processing, Joellen Feirtag for microbiological analyses of the probiotic capsules and contribution to study design, the Solae Company (St. Louis, MO) for donating the soy and milk protein isolates, and UAS Laboratories (Minnetonka, MN) for donating the probiotic capsules.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented in part at Experimental Biology 02, April 2002, New Orleans, LA [Greany, K. A., Nettleton, J. A., Thomas, W., Wangen, K. E. & Kurzer, M. S. (2002) Effect of soy and probiotics on plasma lipids. FASEB J. 16: A610 (abs.)]. Back

2 Supported by U.S. Army Department of Defense Grant DAMD17–99-1–9297, General Clinical Research Center grant M01-RR00400 from the National Center for Research Resources, and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station R. Back

4 Abbreviations used: CHD, coronary heart disease; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride. Back

Manuscript received 15 July 2004. Initial review completed 4 August 2004. Revision accepted 3 September 2004.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. American Heart Association (2004) Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2004 Update 2004 American Heart Association Dallas, TX.

2. Anderson, J. W., Johnstone, B. M. & Cook-Newell, M. E. (1995) Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:276-282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Baum, J. A., Teng, H., Erdman, J. W., Jr, Weigel, R. M., Klein, B. P., Persky, V. W., Freels, S., Surya, P., Bakhit, R. M., Ramos, E., Shay, N. F. & Potter, S. M. (1998) Long-term intake of soy protein improves blood lipid profiles and increases mononuclear cell low-density-lipoprotein receptor messenger RNA in hypercholesterolemic, postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:545-551.[Abstract]

4. Wong, W. W., Smith, E. O., Stuff, J. E., Hachey, D. L., Heird, W. C. & Pownell, H. J. (1998) Cholesterol-lowering effect of soy protein in normocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:1385S-1389S.[Abstract]

5. Crouse, J. R., 3rd, Morgan, T., Terry, J. G., Ellis, J., Vitolins, M. & Burke, G. L. (1999) A randomized trial comparing the effect of casein with that of soy protein containing varying amounts of isoflavones on plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins. Arch. Intern. Med. 159:2070-2076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Merz-Demlow, B. E., Duncan, A. M., Wangen, K. E., Xu, X., Carr, T. P., Phipps, W. R. & Kurzer, M. S. (2000) Soy isoflavones improve plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic, premenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71:1462-1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Teixeira, S. R., Potter, S. M., Weigel, R., Hannum, S., Erdman, J. W., Jr & Hasler, C. M. (2000) Effects of feeding 4 levels of soy protein for 3 and 6 wk on blood lipids and apolipoproteins in moderately hypercholesterolemic men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71:1077-1084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Takatsuka, N., Nagata, C., Kurisu, Y., Inaba, S., Kawakami, N. & Shimizu, H. (2000) Hypocholesterolemic effect of soymilk supplementation with usual diet in premenopausal normolipidemic Japanese women. Prev. Med. 31:308-314.[Medline]

9. Wangen, K. E., Duncan, A. M., Xu, X. & Kurzer, M. S. (2001) Soy isoflavones improve plasma lipids in normocholesterolemic and mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:225-231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Tonstad, S., Smerud, K. & Hoie, L. (2002) A comparison of the effects of 2 doses of soy protein or casein on serum lipids, serum lipoproteins, and plasma total homocysteine in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76:78-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Lichtenstein, A. H., Jalbert, S., Adlercreutz, H., Goldin, B., Rasmussen, H., Schaefer, E. & Ausman, L. (2002) Lipoprotein response to diets high in soy or animal protein with and without isoflavones in moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22:1852-1858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Jayagopai, V., Albertazzi, P., Kilpatrick, E., Howarth, E., Jennings, P., Hepburn, D. & Atkin, S. (2002) Beneficial effects of soy phytoestrogen intake in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1709-1714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Bricarello, L. P., Kasinski, N., Bertolami, M. C., Faludi, A., Pinto, L. A., Relvas, W. G., Izar, M. C., Ihara, S. S., Tufik, S. & Fonseca, F. A. (2004) Comparison between the effects of soy milk and non-fat cow milk on lipid profile and lipid peroxidation in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Nutrition 20:200-204.[Medline]

14. Gooderham, M. H., Adlercreutz, H., Ojala, S. T., Wahala, K. & Holub, B. J. (1996) A soy protein isolate rich in genistein and daidzein and its effects on plasma isoflavone concentrations, platelet aggregation, blood lipids and fatty acid composition of plasma phospholipid in normal men. J. Nutr. 126:2000-2006.

15. Dent, S. B., Peterson, C. T., Brace, L. D., Swain, J. H., Reddy, M. B., Hanson, K. B., Robinson, J. G. & Alekel, D. L. (2001) Soy protein intake by perimenopausal women does not affect circulating lipids and lipoproteins or coagulation and fibrinolytic factors. J. Nutr. 131:2280-2287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Steinberg, F., Guthrie, N., Villablanca, A. C., Kumar, K. & Murray, M. (2003) Soy protein with isoflavones has favorable effects on endothelial function that are independent of lipid and antioxidant effects in healthy postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 78:123-130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Kreijkamp-Kaspers, S., Kok, L., Grobbee, D. E., de Haan, E. H., Aleman, A., Lampe, J. W. & van der Schouw, Y. T. (2004) Effect of soy protein containing isoflavones on cognitive function, bone mineral density, and plasma lipids in postmenopausal women. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 292:65-74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Lovati, M. R., Manzoni, C., Gianazza, E., Arnoldi, A., Kurowska, E., Carroll, K. K. & Sirtori, C. R. (2000) Soy protein peptides regulate cholesterol homeostasis in Hep G2 cells. J. Nutr. 130:2543-2549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Oakenfull, D. (2001) Soy protein, saponins and plasma cholesterol. J. Nutr. 131:2971-2972.[Free Full Text]

20. Anthony, M. S., Clarkson, T. B., Bullock, B. C. & Wagner, J. D. (1997) Soy protein versus soy phytoestrogens in the prevention of diet-induced coronary artery atherosclerosis of male cynomolgus monkeys. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17:2524-2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Lamon-Fava, S. (2000) Genistein activates apolipoprotein A-I gene expression in the human hepatoma cell line Hep G2. J. Nutr. 130:2489-2492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Gruber, C., Tshugguel, W., Schneeberger, C. & Huber, J. (2002) Production and actions of estrogens. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:340-351.[Free Full Text]

23. Howe, P. & Meyer, B. (2004) Lipid-lowering effectiveness of soy protein diets—is it defined by equol-producing status? Oral Presentation Abstract in the Fifth International Symposium on the Role of Soy in Preventing and Treating Chronic Disease. J. Nutr. 134:1234-1237 (abs.).

24. Setchell, K., Brown, N. & Lydeking-Olsen, E. (2002) The clinical importance of the metabolite equol—a clue to the effectiveness of soy and its isoflavones. J. Nutr. 132:3577-3584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Xu, X., Duncan, A. M., Wangen, K. E. & Kurzer, M. S. (2000) Soy consumption alters endogenous estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 9:781-786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Lampe, J. W., Karr, S. C., Hutchins, A. M. & Slavin, J. L. (1998) Urinary soy excretion with a soy challenge: influence of habitual diet. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 217:335-339.[Abstract]

27. Meyer, B., Larkin, T., Owen, A., Astheimer, L., Tapsell, L. & Howe, P. (2004) Limited lipid-lowering effects of regular consumption of whole soybean foods. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 48:67-78.[Medline]

28. Xu, X., Harris, K., Wang, H., Murphy, P. A. & Hendrich, S. (1995) Bioavailability of soybean isoflavones depends upon gut microflora in women. J. Nutr. 125:7-15.

29. Agerback, M., Gerdes, L. & Richelsen, B. (1995) Hypocholesterolemic effect of a new fermented milk product in healthy middle-aged men. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 49:346-352.[Medline]

30. Bertolami, M. C., Faludi, A. A. & Batlouni, M. (1999) Evaluation of the effects of a new fermented milk product (Gaio) on primary hypercholesterolemia. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53:97-101.[Medline]

31. Schaafsma, G., Meuling, W. J., van Dokkum, W. & Bouley, C. (1998) Effects of a milk product, fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus and with fructooligosaccharides added, on blood lipids in male volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 52:436-440.[Medline]

32. Xiao, J. Z., Kondo, S., Takahashi, N., Miyaji, K., Oshida, K., Hiramatsu, A., Iwatsuki, K., Kokubo, S. & Hosono, A. (2003) Effects of milk products fermented by Bifidobacterium longum on blood lipids in rats and healthy adult male volunteers. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2452-2461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Mohan, J. C., Arora, R. & Khalilullah, M. (1990) Short term hypolipidemic effects of oral Lactobacillus sporogenes therapy in patients with primary dyslipidemias. Indian Heart J. 42:361-364.[Medline]

34. de Roos, N. M., Schouten, G. & Katan, M. B. (1999) Yoghurt enriched with Lactobacillus acidophilus does not lower blood lipids in healthy men and women with normal to borderline high serum cholesterol levels. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53:277-280.[Medline]

35. Jahreis, G., Vogelsang, H., Kiessling, G., Schubert, R., Bunte, C. & Hammes, W. (2002) Influence of probiotic sausage (Lactobacillus paracasei) on blood lipids and immunological parameters of healthy volunteers. Food Res. Int. 35:133-138.

36. Kiessling, G., Schneider, J. & Jahreis, G. (2002) Long-term consumption of fermented dairy products over 6 months increases HDL cholesterol. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 56:843-849.[Medline]

37. Lin, S. Y., Ayres, J. W., Winkler, W., Jr & Sandine, W. E. (1989) Lactobacillus effects on cholesterol: in vitro and in vivo results. J. Dairy Sci. 72:2885-2899.

38. Nettleton, J. A., Greany, K. A., Thomas, W., Wangen, K. E., Adlercretuz, H. & Kurzer, M. S. (2004) Plasma phytoestrogens are not altered by probiotic consumption in postmenopausal women with and without a history of breast cancer. J. Nutr. 134:1998-2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Durnin, J. & Womersley, J. (1974) Body fat assess from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br. J. Nutr. 32:77-97.[Medline]

40. Carr, T., Andresen, C. & Rudell, L. (1993) Enzymatic determination of triglyceride, free cholesterol, and total cholesterol in tissue lipid extracts. Clin. Biochem. 26:39-42.[Medline]

41. Friedewald, W., Levy, R. & Fredrickson, D. (1972) Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 18:499-502.[Abstract]

42. Brouwers, E., L’Homme, R., Al-Maharik, N., Lapcik, O., Hampl, R., Wahala, K., Mikola, H. & Adlercreutz, H. (2003) Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for equol in plasma and urine. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 84:577-588.[Medline]

43. Teede, H. J., Dalais, F. S., Kotsopoulos, D., Liang, Y. L., Davis, S. & McGrath, B. P. (2001) Dietary soy has both beneficial and potentially adverse cardiovascular effects: a placebo-controlled study in men and postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86:3053-3060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. D. R. Setchell and S. J. Cole
Method of Defining Equol-Producer Status and Its Frequency among Vegetarians
J. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 136(8): 2188 - 2193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greany, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurzer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greany, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kurzer, M. S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]