Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, R. S.
© 2004 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 134:179-182, January 2004

Nutrition and Cancer
Research Communication

Dietary Soy Isoflavones and Estrone Protect Ovariectomized ER{alpha}KO and Wild-Type Mice from Carcinogen-Induced Colon Cancer1,2

Ju-Yuan Guo, Xiaosong Li, Jimmy D. Browning, Jr., George E. Rottinghaus*, Dennis B. Lubahn{dagger}, Andreas Constantinou**, Maurice Bennink{ddagger} and Ruth S. MacDonald3

Department of Food Science, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211; * Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211; {dagger} Departments of Biochemistry, Animal Sciences and Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211; ** Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612; and {ddagger} Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1224.

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: macdonaldr{at}missouri.edu.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Consumption of soy foods has been weakly associated with reduced colon cancer risk. Colon cancer risk is influenced by estrogen exposure, although the mechanism through which this occurs is not defined. Conversion of estradiol (E2) to estrone (E1) may be protective in the colon. We hypothesized that dietary phytoestrogens, or E1, would reduce colon tumorigenesis via an estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent mechanism. Ovariectomized ER{alpha}KO or wild-type (WT) female mice were fed diets containing casein (Casein), soy protein without isoflavones (Soy-IF), soy protein + genistein (Soy+Gen), soy protein + NovaSoy (Soy+NSoy) or soy protein + estrone (Soy+E1) from weaning. Colon tumors were induced with azoxymethane. Tumor incidence was affected by diet but not genotype. Colon tumor incidence was lower in ER{alpha}KO and WT mice fed the Soy+E1 diet compared with those fed the casein or Soy-IF diets. Mice fed Soy+NSoy had a lower tumor incidence than mice fed casein, but not Soy-IF. Genistein did not affect tumor incidence. Soy protein, independently of phytoestrogens or E1, significantly reduced relative colon weight, tumor burden and multiplicity. Relative colon weight was lower (P = 0.008) in mice fed Soy+E1 than in the other soy-fed groups. Tumor incidence in this group was lower than in the casein and soy-IF–fed groups and tended to be lower than in the others (P = 0.020). Hence, soy protein and NSoy protect mice from colon cancer, and E1 further reduces colon tumorigenesis in mice, independently of ER{alpha}.

KEY WORDS: • colon cancer • genistein • isoflavone • azoxymethane • estrone

Colon cancer is the third most common form of cancer in the U.S. population. In 2001 estimated new cases of colon cancer were 46,200 for men and 52,000 for women (1). Controversy exists concerning the role of diet in colon cancer. Based on an extensive review of the existing literature, the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research concluded that there was convincing evidence that the risk of colon cancer was reduced by physical activity and vegetable intake, and that there was probable evidence that the consumption of red meat and alcohol increased the risk of colon cancer (2). Other factors such as the amount of dietary fiber, total fat and sugar intake and high body mass were poorly correlated with risk. Consumption of soy has been found to reduce colon cancer risk in some human populations and animal studies, but the evidence is not substantial (3). In those studies, the specific components of soy, including soy protein and the isoflavones, were not carefully controlled. The soy isoflavone (IF)3 glycosides, genistin, daidzin and glycetin, and the corresponding aglycones, genistein, daidzein and glycetein, are phytoestrogens that bind with low affinity to both forms of estrogen receptors (ER), but tend to have a higher affinity for ERß (4).

Although colon cancer has not been considered a hormone-responsive cancer, evidence suggests that estrogens may play a role in this disease. In the early 1970s, a transient decrease in colon cancer incidence occurred among women aged 35–44 y, but not among men (5). This observation correlated with a peak in fertility and the use of high dose oral contraceptives during the preceding decade. The authors concluded that either high fertility or exposure to exogenous steroid hormones protected the women from colon cancer. Based on a meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) by postmenopausal women was associated with a 20% decrease in colon cancer risk (6). Recently, one phase of the Women’s Health Initiative study was prematurely halted due to increased risk of invasive breast cancer among the group receiving conjugated equine estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate; however, colon cancer incidence was reduced among the women receiving HRT compared with the placebo group (7).

The most active mammalian estrogen is 17ß-estradiol (E2), which can be generated from estrone (E1) via 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17ßHSD). Two isozymes of 17ßHSD, type 2 and 4 are localized in the colon mucosa, and may provide a barrier for ingested steroids (8). Normal human colon tissue converts E2 to E1 at a high rate, and this activity is reduced in colon tumors (9). Incubation of human colon tumor cells (Caco-2) with E2 increased cell growth, whereas E1 inhibited proliferation (10). Hence, E1 may be an antiproliferative agent in the colon (11). The primary types of HRT (Premarin/Prempak C) contain {delta}-8-E1 sulfate, which may explain in part their protective effects on colon cancer.

In this study, we investigated the response of azoxymethane-induced colon tumors in ovariectomized, female mice with intact (wild type, WT) or disrupted ER{alpha} (ER{alpha}KO) to dietary soy protein, genistein, NovaSoy or E1. We hypothesized that phytoestrogens and E1 would protect WT mice from colon cancer, but the absence of ER{alpha} would eliminate the protective effect.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
    Animals, diets and study design. The experimental protocol was approved by the University of Missouri Animal Care and Use Committee and was conducted according to the NRC guidelines. ER{alpha}KO and WT littermates were bred in our colony under standard husbandry conditions. Breeding pairs were fed an AIN93G diet containing casein as the protein source throughout breeding and lactation. At weaning, female mice were randomly assigned to one of 5 diet groups and consumed that diet throughout the study. The diets were based on the AIN93G formula and were isocaloric; the groups were casein, soy without IF (Soy-IF), soy with NovaSoy (Soy+NSoy), soy with genistein (Soy+Gen) and soy with estrone (Soy+E1). Soy protein, obtained from Archer Daniels Midland (Decatur, IL), was treated by the manufacturer to remove the majority of the IF. The same lot and batch were used for all of the diets containing soy protein. The dose of genistein (250 mg/kg diet) was based on our previous finding of delayed mammary tumorigenesis in mice fed this concentration (12). The dose of NSoy was calculated to provide the equivalent of 250 mg genistein/kg diet based on the manufacturer’s analysis. The dose of E1 was extrapolated from the typical human HRT dose for Premarin (0.625 mg/d). Phytate was added to the casein diet at a concentration equivalent to that found in the soy protein based on the manufacturer’s analysis. A total of 15 mice per diet and genotype were obtained over a 6-mo period. At 8 wk of age, the mice were ovariectomized to reduce differences in circulating estrogen between ER{alpha}KO and WT mice. Beginning at wk 10, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 15 mg azoxymethane (AOM; Ash-Stevens, Detroit, MI)/kg body weight once a week for 6 wk. AOM injections were done at the same time of day throughout the study. Mice were killed between 0800 and 1200 h during wk 50, and blood was collected by cardiac puncture. Serum was separated by centrifugation (1000 x g for 10 min) and stored frozen. A midlateral incision was made and the intestinal tract removed. The small intestine and colon were rinsed and weighed, then opened longitudinally and examined for tumors. The location of each tumor was recorded before it was excised, weighed and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The small intestine was divided into three sections, duodenum, jejunum and ileum, and each segment was rinsed, blotted and weighed. Abdominal fat, including the inguinal and peritoneal pads, was removed and weighed. Serum genistein was analyzed by HPLC with CoulArray detection as previously described (13).

    Statistical analyses. Tumor incidence data were analyzed using the CATMOD procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All other data were analyzed as a 2 x 5 factorial design with 2 genotypes (ER{alpha}KO and WT) and 5 diets using the General Linear Models (GLM) procedure. Differences among means were determined by the least-square (LS)MEANS component of GLM. Main effects and interactions were considered significant at P < 0.05.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The final body weight of ER{alpha}KO mice was less than that of WT mice (26.4 + 0.3 vs 25.3 + 0.4 g, P = 0.035). There was no interaction between diet and genotype but diet affected body weight. The mice fed Soy+Gen, Soy+NSoy or Soy+E1 weighed more at the end of the study than mice fed Soy-IF or casein (Table 1). There generally was more abdominal fat (g/100 g) in the heavier mice, which may partially explain the difference in body weight. Genistein was highest in serum from mice fed Soy+Gen, elevated in mice fed Soy+NSoy and very low in the other groups (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1 Final body weight, body fat and intestine relative weights and serum genistein concentration in ovariectomized mice fed diets containing casein (Casein), soy without IF (Soy-IF), soy with genistein (Soy+Gen), soy with NovaSoy (Soy+NSoy) or soy with E1 (Soy+E1)1

 
Tumor incidence was not affected by genotype, nor was there a diet x genotype interaction. However, diet affected tumor incidence. Tumor incidence in ER{alpha}KO and WT mice was between 70 and 80% of that in mice fed casein or Soy-IF (Fig. 1). Mice fed Soy+Gen had a tumor incidence that did not differ from mice fed Soy-IF and casein. Tumor incidence was lower in mice fed Soy+NSoy than in mice fed casein but not compared with those fed Soy-IF or Soy+Gen. Mice fed estrone (Soy+E1) had lower tumor incidence than those fed Soy-IF or casein. Tumor incidence did not differ among mice fed Soy+Gen, Soy+NSoy or Soy+E1.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1 Tumor incidence in ovariectomized mice fed diets containing casein (casein), soy without IF (Soy-IF), soy with genistein (Soy+Gen), soy with NovaSoy (Soy+NSoy) or soy with E1 (Soy+E1). Bars without a common letter differ, P < 0.005 (CATMOD).

 
Tumor burden (total tumor weight/mouse) and tumor multiplicity (tumors/mouse) were not affected by genotype, nor was there a diet x genotype interaction. However, both were affected by dietary treatment. Mice fed soy protein diets, regardless of the addition of estrogenic compounds, had lower tumor burden and multiplicity compared with mice fed casein (Fig. 2). The addition of E1 to the soy protein diet tended to further reduce colon tumor weight (P = 0.008). The relative weights of the colon, jejunum and ileum, but not duodenum, were significantly less in mice fed soy protein compared with casein (Table 1). An exception was the relative ileum weight in mice fed Soy+Gen, which was not different from the casein-fed mice.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2 Tumor burden (total tumor weight, g/mouse) and tumor multiplicity (number of tumors per mouse) in ovariectomized mice fed diets containing casein (Casein), soy without IF (Soy-IF), soy with genistein (Soy+Gen), soy with NovaSoy (Soy+NSoy) or soy with E1 (Soy+E1). Values are means ± SEM, n = 23–30. Means for a variable with unlike letters differ, P < 0.005 (ANOVA and least-square means).

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
LITERATURE CITED
 
Soy consumption is increasing in the United States due to an awareness of the health benefits of soy. The FDA recently approved a health claim for reducing cardiovascular disease that recommends 25 g of soy protein/d (21 CFR 101.82). Peri- and postmenopausal women are using soy and soy extracts containing IF as an alternative to HRT, and NSoy or similar commercial soy extracts are increasingly being marketed in food products. In this study, we attempted to separate the effects of soy protein, genistein and a soy extract on colon tumorigenesis. We observed no protection from AOM-induced colon tumorigenesis due to soy protein alone. The addition of NSoy to soy protein, however, reduced tumor incidence compared with casein-fed mice. This finding agrees with two previous reports. Reduced tumor incidence was observed in AOM-treated rats fed soy protein isolate containing a similar amount of IF (14). A reduction in aberrant crypt foci, purported precancer lesions, was observed in AOM-treated rats fed soy flakes or soy flour containing IF compared with soy concentrate without IF (15). Two other studies, however, were not in agreement. More aberrant crypt foci were observed in AOM-treated rats fed soy protein with IF compared with soy protein without IF (16), and no difference in tumorigenesis was reported in ApcMin mice fed low IF or IF-rich soy protein (17). In our study, genistein added to a soy protein diet did not protect mice from colon tumorigenesis. In contrast, a smaller dose of genistein (167 mg/kg diet) with soy protein reduced aberrant crypt foci by 50% in AOM-treated rats (15). A previous report also found that genistein added to a casein diet did not affect tumorigenesis in AOM-treated rats (18), but tumor multiplicity was higher in rats fed genistein compared with rats fed a casein diet without genistein. We found genistein to have no effect on tumor multiplicity, although soy protein had an independent protective effect that may have superceded a response to genistein. Furthermore, our study was done using ovariectomized female mice, whereas most previous studies have used male rats (14–16,18). It is possible that the response to AOM and/or the dietary treatments differs between males and females and between rats and mice.

Our observation that soy protein reduced colon tumor weight and multiplicity in mice compared with casein was independent of estrogenic compounds in the diet. This protective effect of soy protein may have been due to reduced cell proliferation in the colon because the relative colon weight was lower in these mice compared with those fed casein. Analysis of colonic cell proliferation and apoptosis will be presented in a subsequent report. The components of soy protein that may have provided the protective effect are not known. Dietary fiber has long been considered to reduce colon cancer development. Although our five diets contained the same amounts of cellulose, soy protein may contain other forms of fiber that may have altered gut microflora, thereby reducing tumor cell growth. It is important to note that we added phytate to the casein diet to eliminate this variable from the study; however, exogenously added phytate may have physiochemical properties that differ from endogenous phytate in the soy.

Human colon cancer cell lines have been found to express primarily ERß (19,20). E2 (10–1000 nmol/L) consistently inhibited cell proliferation in colon tumor cells expressing ERß (19). Furthermore, in colon cells that expressed ERß but not ER{alpha}, E2 induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner, but in cells that expressed both receptors, E2 had no effect on apoptosis (20). Normal human colon expressed both ER{alpha} and ERß, but in malignant tissue ERß was selectively lost (20). Hence, ERß appears to be the dominant receptor in the colon and to play a role in cell proliferation or metabolism. These two receptors may function in opposite ways, i.e., ERß activates apoptosis whereas ER{alpha} acts as a survival factor (20). In the present study, NSoy and E1 reduced tumorigenesis in both WT and ER{alpha}KO mice; hence, this effect was independent of ER{alpha}. Several hypotheses to explain this observation are possible. One hypothesis is that both NSoy and E1 mediate their protective effects via ERß. To examine this, we are repeating the experimental design in ERßKO mice. Another hypothesis is that NSoy and E1 alter ER-independent pathways in the colon. Soy IF, in particular genistein, are enzyme inhibitors. However, our data do not support the concept that IF provide protection primarily via inhibition of intracellular signaling pathways related to tyrosine kinases because genistein did not reduce tumorigenesis. NSoy contains a mixture of compounds in addition to IF. Saponins are a major component of this product and have been reported to reduce aberrant crypt foci in mice (21) and to inhibit colon tumor cell growth in vitro (22). Bowman-Burk inhibitor (BBI) may also be present in NSoy and has been found to inhibit carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in rats (23). The mechanisms through which saponins or BBI alter colon tumorigenesis are not known; however, it is unlikely that these effects are mediated via ER. Furthermore, the IF in NSoy are primarily in the glucoside form, which may have a very different effect from aglycones on the gastrointestinal tract (24). Perhaps the presence of slowly digested IF glucosides in the colon influenced gut microflora or contents (e.g., bile salts) which offered protection from tumorigenesis (25). It is also feasible that soy protein has an independent effect on colon microflora (25).

The most effective tumor protection in our study was oral administration of E1. This is the first report to our knowledge in which oral E1 was shown to be protective of colon tumorigenesis in an animal model. The metabolism of estrogens in the colon has not been well described, although 17ßHSD activity is present in colon. Using immunocytochemistry, 17ß HSD2 and 17ßHSD4 were localized in the colon epithelial cells primarily in the luminal region (11). Immunoreactivity was reduced in mucosa adjacent to tumor tissue and was further reduced in the tumor. The activity of these isoenzymes is primarily oxidative, resulting in inactivation of E2 via conversion to E1; hence inactivation of E2 may be important for colon cell regulation. It has been proposed that loss of E2 inactivation by colon tumors may lead to increased cell proliferation, supposedly via an ER-dependent pathway (9,10). Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to ER were found to inhibit E2-stimulated growth in a mouse colon tumor cell line; unfortunately the specificity of the oligodeoxynucleotides for ER{alpha} or ERß was not defined (26). Although our study does not specifically address the question of E2 stimulation of colon tumor cell proliferation, we showed that E1 does not require ER{alpha} to provide protection from colon tumorigenesis. Many metabolites of E2 and E1 are generated by the cytochrome P450 enzymes, which may function as local mediators of cellular events via ER-independent mechanisms (27). Hence, the observed protection from colon tumorigenesis by E1 may be mediated by such locally generated metabolites. Our observation that E1 reduced colon tumorigenesis corroborates evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative that HRT may be protective of colon cancer (7) and provides a new approach for colon cancer prevention.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Brent Flickinger and Archer Daniels Midland for providing the soy protein and NovaSoy for this study.


   FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented in part at Experimental Biology 03, April 2003, San Diego, CA [MacDonald, R. S., Guo, J.-Y., Li, X., Browning, J. D. & Lubahn, D. B. (2003) Soy isoflavones reduce colon tumor incidence in wild-type and ER{alpha}KO mice. FASEB J. 17: A1203 (abs.)]. Back

2 Supported by the American Institute for Cancer Research 00B055-REV. Back

4 Abbreviations used: AOM, azoxymethane; BBI, Bowman Burke inhibitor; 17ßHSD, 17-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; E1, estrone; E2, 17-ß estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; Gen, genistein; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; IF, isoflavone; NSoy, NovaSoy; WT, wild-type. Back

Manuscript received 2 September 2003. Initial review completed 16 September 2003. Revision accepted 8 October 2003.


   LITERATURE CITED
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. National Institutes of Health (2002) NCI Fact Book 2002 U.S. Health and Human Services Washington, DC.

2. World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (1997) Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective 1997 Banta Book Group Menasha, WI.

3. Messina, M. & Bennink, M. (1998) Soyfoods, isoflavones and risk of colonic cancer: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Bailliere’s. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 12:707-728.[Medline]

4. Branham, W. S., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., Hass, B. S., Blair, R. M., Fang, H., Shi, L., Tong, W., Perkins, R. G. & Sheehan, D. M. (2002) Phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens bind to the rat uterine estrogen receptor. J. Nutr. 132:658-664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. McMichael, A. J. & Potter, J. D. (1980) Reproduction, endogenous and exogenous sex hormones, and colon cancer: a review and hypothesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 65:1201-1207.

6. Bhat, H. K., Calaf, G., Hei, T. K., Loya, T. & Vadgama, J. V. (2003) Critical role of oxidative stress in estrogen-induced carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:3913-3918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Rossouw, J. E., Anderson, G. L., Prentice, R. L., LaCroix, A. Z., Kooperberg, C., Stefanick, M. L., Jackson, R. D., Beresford, S. A., Howard, B. V., Johnson, K. C., Kotchen, J. M. & Ockene, J., Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288:321-333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. English, M. A., Stewart, P. M. & Hewison, M. (2001) Estrogen metabolism and malignancy: analysis of the expression and function of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in colonic cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 171:53-60.[Medline]

9. English, M. A., Kane, K. F., Cruickshank, N., Langman, M. J., Stewart, P. M. & Hewison, M. (1999) Loss of estrogen inactivation in colonic cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84:2080-2085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Di, D. M., Castoria, G., Bilancio, A., Migliaccio, A. & Auricchio, F. (1996) Estradiol activation of human colon carcinoma-derived Caco-2 cell growth. Cancer Res. 56:4516-4521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. English, M. A., Hughes, S. V., Kane, K. F., Langman, M. J., Stewart, P. M. & Hewison, M. (2000) Oestrogen inactivation in the colon: analysis of the expression and regulation of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes in normal colon and colonic cancer. Br. J. Cancer 83:550-558.[Medline]

12. Jin, Z. & MacDonald, R. S. (2002) Soy isoflavones increase latency of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice. J. Nutr. 132:3186-3190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Day, J. K., Besch-Williford, C., McMann, T. R., Hufford, M. G., Lubahn, D. B. & MacDonald, R. S. (2001) Dietary genistein increased DMBA-induced mammary adenocarcinoma in wild-type, but not ER alpha KO, mice. Nutr. Cancer 39:226-232.[Medline]

14. Hakkak, R., Korourian, S., Ronis, M. J., Johnston, J. M. & Badger, T. M. (2001) Soy protein isolate consumption protects against azoxymethane-induced colon tumors in male rats. Cancer Lett. 166:27-32.[Medline]

15. Thiagarajan, D. G., Bennink, M. R., Bourquin, L. D. & Kavas, F. A. (1998) Prevention of precancerous colonic lesions in rats by soy flakes, soy flour, genistein, and calcium. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:1394S-1399S.[Abstract]

16. Davies, M. J., Bowey, E. A., Adlercreutz, H., Rowland, I. R. & Rumsby, P. C. (1999) Effects of soy or rye supplementation of high-fat diets on colon tumour development in azoxymethane-treated rats. Carcinogenesis 20:927-931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Sorensen, I. K., Kristiansen, E., Mortensen, A., Nicolaisen, G. M., Wijnands, J. A., van Kranen, H. J. & van Kreijl, C. F. (1998) The effect of soy isoflavones on the development of intestinal neoplasia in ApcMin mouse. Cancer Lett. 130:217-225.[Medline]

18. Rao, C. V., Wang, C. X., Simi, B., Lubet, R., Kelloff, G., Steele, V. & Reddy, B. S. (1997) Enhancement of experimental colon cancer by genistein. Cancer Res. 57:3717-3722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Fiorelli, G., Picariello, L., Martineti, V., Tonelli, F. & Brandi, M. L. (1999) Functional estrogen receptor beta in colon cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261:521-527.[Medline]

20. Qiu, Y., Waters, C. E., Lewis, A. E., Langman, M. J. & Eggo, M. C. (2002) Oestrogen-induced apoptosis in colonocytes expressing oestrogen receptor beta. J. Endocrinol. 174:369-377.[Abstract]

21. Koratkar, R. & Rao, A. V. (1997) Effect of soya bean saponins on azoxymethane-induced preneoplastic lesions in the colon of mice. Nutr. Cancer 27:206-209.[Medline]

22. Sung, M. K., Kendall, C. W., Koo, M. M. & Rao, A. V. (1995) Effect of soybean saponins and gypsophilla saponin on growth and viability of colon carcinoma cells in culture. Nutr. Cancer 23:259-270.[Medline]

23. Kennedy, A. R., Billings, P. C., Wan, X. S. & Newberne, P. M. (2002) Effects of Bowman-Birk inhibitor on rat colon carcinogenesis. Nutr. Cancer 43:174-186.[Medline]

24. Setchell, K. D. (1998) Phytoestrogens: the biochemistry, physiology, and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:1333S-1346S.[Abstract]

25. Azuma, N., Suda, H., Iwasaki, H., Yamagata, N., Saeki, T., Kanamoto, R. & Iwami, K. (2000) Antitumorigenic effects of several food proteins in a rat model with colon cancer and their reverse correlation with plasma bile acid concentration. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 46:91-96.

26. Xu, X. & Thomas, M. L. (1994) Estrogen receptor-mediated direct stimulation of colon cancer cell growth in vitro. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 105:197-201.[Medline]

27. Zhu, B. T. & Conney, A. H. (1998) Functional role of estrogen metabolism in target cells: review and perspectives. Carcinogenesis 19:1-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Yang, X.-O. Shu, H. Li, W.-H. Chow, H. Cai, X. Zhang, Y.-T. Gao, and W. Zheng
Prospective cohort study of soy food intake and colorectal cancer risk in women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. Gunter, D. R. Hoover, H. Yu, S. Wassertheil-Smoller, T. E. Rohan, J. E. Manson, B. V. Howard, J. Wylie-Rosett, G. L. Anderson, G. Y.F. Ho, et al.
Insulin, Insulin-like Growth Factor-I, Endogenous Estradiol, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
R. Xiao, L. J Hennings, T. M Badger, and F. A Simmen
Fetal programing of colon cancer in adult rats: correlations with altered neonatal growth trajectory, circulating IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, and testosterone
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
W. D. Johnson, L. Dooley, R. L. Morrissey, L. Arp, I. Kapetanovic, J. A. Crowell, and D. L. McCormick
Oncogenicity Evaluations of Chemopreventive Soy Components in p53(+/-) (p53 knockout) Mice
International Journal of Toxicology, May 1, 2006; 25(3): 219 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Z. Fang, D. Chen, Y. Sun, Z. Jin, J. K. Christman, and C. S. Yang
Reversal of Hypermethylation and Reactivation of p16INK4a, RAR{beta}, and MGMT Genes by Genistein and Other Isoflavones from Soy
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7033 - 7041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
R. S. MacDonald, J. Guo, J. Copeland, J. D. Browning Jr, D. Sleper, G. E. Rottinghaus, and M. A. Berhow
Environmental Influences on Isoflavones and Saponins in Soybeans and Their Role in Colon Cancer
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1239 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
E. T. Hawk and B. Levin
Colorectal Cancer Prevention
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 378 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, R. S.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2004 by American Society for Nutrition