![]() |
|
|
Graduate Program in Nutrition and the Nutrition Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: milnerj{at}mail.nih.gov.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: diallyl disulfide tumor proliferation G2/M phase protein kinase cDNA array
Colon cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death and the third most common type of malignancy in the United States (1). Despite recent advances in surgical and chemotherapeutic procedures, the 5-y survival rate for colon cancer is only 61% (1). Identifying alternative factors that may reduce the initiation and promotion of colon cancer is therefore important for minimizing the incidence and severity of this disease.
Garlic, sometimes referred to as a spice, herb or a vegetable, is recognized for its savory characteristics, which are associated with its high content of sulfur-containing compounds (2). Support for the ability of garlic (Allium sativum) to retard colon carcinogenesis in humans comes from recent meta-analyses that found that consumption of raw and cooked garlic (
3.5g/wk) was associated with a 0.69 random-effects relative risk (3). Similarly, considerable preclinical evidence with model carcinogens and transplantable tumors supports a protective role of garlic and some of its allyl sulfur components. Specifically, animal studies demonstrate that allyl sulfides effectively inhibit 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and azoxymethane chemically induced colon tumor formation (48). Laboratory studies reveal that intraperitoneal and intragastric administration of allyl sulfide reduces the growth of transplanted HCT-15 colon tumor cells in nude mice (9). A similar depression in the proliferation of breast tumors and sarcoma cells was also noted (10,11). Consequently, allyl sulfides appear to effectively modify several phases of the in vivo cancer process, including tumor behavior.
Tumor growth is characterized by abnormalities in the mechanisms governing cell division and apoptosis (12,13). Antitumorigenic agents control tumor behavior by disrupting cell division and/or enhancing the apoptotic process (13,14). The antitumorigenic effects of water-soluble S-allylmercaptocysteine, and lipid-soluble diallyl sulfide and diallyl disulfide (DADS)3 relate both to a suppression in cell division and to an induction of apoptosis (10,1519). Recently, studies found that the ability of DADS to disrupt cell division corresponds to suppressions in p34cdc2 kinase activity and a block in the progression of cells from the G2 into the M phase of the cell cycle (20). This suppression in p34cdc2 activity was associated with a decrease in p34cdc2/cyclin B1 complex formation and its subsequent conversion to an active hypophosphorylated enzyme (21). Because p34cdc2 formation and activation are critical for cells to undergo mitosis (22), this suppression in p34cdc2 kinase is likely one of the final events leading to DADSs blocking of G2/M progression. It remains to be determined what early cellular events mediate this suppression in p34cdc2 kinase activity and G2/M progression.
Cell division is governed by an intricate signaling system controlled at several stages by protein kinases (23). A number of these cellular kinases are implicated as potential modifiers of the G2/M phase transition (2427). For instance, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) promotes progression of cells through mitosis by facilitating p34cdc2 kinase activation (24). Protein kinase C (PKC) appears to be involved in regulating p34cdc2 kinase activity, lamin B phosphorylation and nuclear lamina disassembly (25,26). Last, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAM KII) is believed to be a key factor in targeting cyclin B1 for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis after the completion of mitosis (27). In the present studies, we examined whether alterations in PKC, CAM KII and/or ERK activities are events mediating the block in G2/M progression by DADS.
To gain a more global understanding of DADSs effects on cell division and overall tumor behavior, we also utilized cDNA array technology to screen HCT-15 cells for changes in gene expression. Data generated using a cancer-specific cDNA array offered insight into the cell cycle, DNA damage and extracellular matrix events that occur after exposure to DADS.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human colon tumor cell line (HCT-15) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). DADS was purchased from Fluka Chemika (Ronkonkoma, NY). SignaTECT protein kinase C and SignaTECT calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase assay systems were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI). [
-32P]ATP (specific activity
370 GBq/L) and [
-33P]dATP (specific activity
370 GBq/L) were purchased from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Irvine, CA). The p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) assay kit and polyclonal anti-p44/42 MAPK antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA). Monoclonal anti-p-ERK antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL) and peroxidase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY). Atlas cDNA Expression Arrays were purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).
Culture conditions.
HCT-15 cells were plated in tissue culture flasks and grown under a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C in RPMI 1640 medium (pH 7.2) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (1 x 107 units/L penicillin and 10 g/L streptomycin) and 1 mg/L insulin (28). Cells were plated at 4 x 103/cm2 for 24 h before synchronization by the double thymidine block method of Stein and Stein (29). Synchronized cells were treated with DADS 2 h after thymidine removal. DADS was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) before addition to cultures. Control cultures were treated with DMSO. The maximum quantity of DMSO added to the medium in these studies was 0.01%.
Cell proliferation.
HCT-15 cells were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.2) and harvested by trypsinization (2.5 g/L trypsin and 0.38 g/L EDTA) at the specified incubation times indicated below. Trypsin was deactivated by the addition of RPMI containing fetal bovine serum, and suspensions were centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in RPMI 1640 and counted using a hemocytometer to determine the number of viable cells.
Flow cytometry of cellular DNA.
Synchronizes HCT-15 cells were harvested 4 h after DADS treatment, fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at -20°C until subsequent analysis. After centrifugation at 500 x g and the removal of the fixing agent, cellular DNA was stained by the addition of PBS containing 2 x 105 units/L RNase and 18 mg/L propidium iodide and analyzed as previously described (20).
Cell lysis and protein quantification.
Synchronized HCT-15 cells were harvested 4 h after DADS addition and incubated in a lysis buffer composed of 25 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L EGTA, 0.05% Triton X-100, 10 mmol/L ß-mercaptoethanol, 50 mg/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2.2 mg/L aprotinin and 0.7 mg/L pepstatin A for analysis of PKC activity or in 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mmol/L EDTA, 2 mmol/L EGTA, 20 mg/L soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 mg/L leupeptin, 25 mmol/L benzamidin, 50 mg/L PMSF, 2.2 mg/L aprotinin and 0.7 mg/L pepstatin A for examination of CAMK II activity. ERK extracts were obtained by incubating HCT-15 cells in 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L ß-glycerolphosphate, 1 mmol/L sodium vanadate, 1 mg/L leupeptin, 50 mg/L PMSF, 2.2 mg/L aprotinin and 0.7 mg/L pepstatin A. After brief sonification, extracts were incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged at 10,000 (CAM KII) or 14,000 x g (PKC and ERK) for 510 min at 4°C. The amount of protein in the resulting supernatant was determined using a standard kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL or Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
PKC and CAM KII activity.
Phospholipid stimulation of PKC activity and CAM KII stimulation by Ca2+ and calmodulin were measured using the methods described by Promega. Radioactivity was monitored using a Beckman model 3801 Scintillation Counter (Irvine, CA) to a final two-sigma error of 2%.
ERK activity.
ERK activity was assessed by a nonradioactive method according to the manufacturers directions (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA). Bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Life Science, Bucks, UK). NIH Image 1.61 software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) was used to determine the relative density of each band. The amount of phosphorylated Elk-1 detected corresponded to ERK activity.
ERK Western blots.
Extracts from HCT-15 ERK lysates were subjected to electrophoresis on a 12% SDS acrylamide gel, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with anti-p44/42 MAP kinase or anti-P-ERK as the primary antibody and anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG conjugated peroxidase as a secondary antibody. Bands were detected and quantitated as described above.
RNA isolation.
Synchronized HCT-15 cells were exposed to DADS (0 or 50 µmol/L) for 12 h. Cells collected from 7 flasks (150 cm2) per treatment were pooled, and total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent as directed by the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Poly A+ RNA was obtained by passing total RNA over an oligo (dT) cellulose column known to preferentially bind mRNA. mRNA was eluted from the column using 3 mL of 1 mol/L Tris-HCl, 0.1 mol/L EDTA, 5 mol/L lithium chloride and 200 g/L SDS, and pelleted by the addition of 300 µL of 3 mol/L NaOAc and 2.5 mL of 100% ethanol overnight at -20°C. After centrifugation, mRNA pellets were washed with 80% ethanol, dried and stored in DEPC-treated water at -80°C.
cDNA expression arrays.
33P-cDNA probes were prepared using the Atlas Human Cancer cDNA Expression Array kit developed by Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). Arrays were scanned by a Storm Phosphorimager and quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Arrays were then stripped and reused in a second experiment involving control and DADS-treated samples. In this second experiment, arrays were switched so that the control array from the first experiment was used as the treatment array in the second experiment. This controlled for the nonspecific binding of the 33P-cDNA probes to one array over the other.
The signals obtained from the two arrays were normalized to the nine housekeeping genes provided and compared with each other using the control array as a reference. The background intensity of each array was used as a threshold for filtering out signals that were too weak to be meaningfully interpreted.
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Fishers least significant difference test (StatView 4.51, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Treatment differences with P < 0.05 were considered significantly different.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Examination of cellular DNA profiles revealed that DADS increased the proportion of cells residing in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Fig. 1). Treatment with 25, 50 or 100 µmol/L DADS for 4 h resulted in a 30, 31 and 63% increase in the G2/M phase population, respectively (P < 0.05). Cell numbers increased by 1.9, 1.8, 1.6 and 1.7 x 106 in response to 0, 25, 50 and 100 µmol/L DADS, respectively, and did not differ during this 4-h exposure.
|
The effect of DADS on PKC and CAM KII was examined to determine whether changes in activity accompanied the block in G2/M progression. PKC and CAM KII activities were not influenced by DADS (25, 50 or 100 µmol/L) compared with controls (data not shown). The mean PKC activity for control lysates was 3.5 pmol ATP/(min · µg protein).
ERK activity.
Although significant elevations in ERK activity were not observed in response to 25 or 50 µmol/L DADS, exposure to 100 µmol/L increased activity by 44% compared with controls (P < 0.05; Fig. 2). Similar elevations in ERK activity occurred when cells were exposed to a higher concentration of DADS (500 µmol/L; Fig. 2).
|
Western blot analysis was used to determine whether changes in ERK protein expression and/or phosphorylation accounted for the ability of DADS to increase ERK activity. Differences in ERK protein expression were not detected in cultures grown in the presence or absence of DADS (0, 25, 50, 100 and 500 µmol/L; Fig. 3). However, elevations in ERK phosphorylation were found to accompany DADS exposure (Fig. 4). Adding 25, 50, 100 and 500 µmol/L DADS to cell cultures increased ERK phosphorylation by 39, 52, 73 and 61%, respectively (P < 0.05).
|
|
To maximize our ability to detect changes in gene expression, we examined the effect of a 12-h DADS (50 µmol/L) exposure on gene expression profiles in synchronized HCT-15 cells. In the present study,
12% of the genes on the array were expressed above the detection limit. Tables 1, and 2 summarize the gene expression profile changes observed after DADS exposure. Overall, 36 genes were found to differ by at least 1.5-fold in DADS-treated cells compared with controls. mRNA expression levels revealed that 24 genes were up-regulated (Table 1), whereas 12 genes were down-regulated in response to DADS (Table 2).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alterations in CAM KII activity did not accompany DADS (
100 µmol/L) exposure in the present studies. Suppressions in PKC activity were also not observed, suggesting that modifications in the activity of these enzymes do not account for the ability of DADS to block G2/M progression. Other studies found that depressions in platelet aggregation by ajoene, another sulfur compound in garlic, occurred independently of PKC and CAM KII regulation (34,35). Specifically, Rendu et al. (34) showed that ajoene (100 µmol/L) inhibited thrombin-induced aggregation without modifying PKC or CAM KII phosphorylation of protein P43 and the myosin light chain P20, respectively. Apitz-Castro et al. (35) found that direct activation of PKC by phorbol myristate acetate and its subsequent phosphorylation of P47 were also unaffected by ajoene (35). Collectively, these studies suggest that total PKC activity is not altered in response to DADS or ajoene. Whether differential regulation of PKC isozymes occurs in response to allyl sulfides in garlic remains to be determined.
The present studies reveal that elevations in ERK activity accompany exposure to high concentrations of DADS (100 and 500 µmol/L). Using Western blot analysis, we found that this increase in activity was associated with increased ERK protein phosphorylation. Increased ERK phosphorylation occurred in response to both low (25 and 50 µmol/L) and high (100 and 500 µmol/L) concentrations of DADS. The reason for the increase in phosphorylation in response to 25 and 50 µmol/L DADS is unclear because significant elevations in ERK activity were not observed in response to these concentrations. Studies by Wang et al. (36) suggested that ERK phosphorylation prevents cells from exiting mitosis. They found that injection of metaphase Xenopus tadpole cells with ERK-specific MAPK kinase-1 inhibited mitosis, whereas ERK dephosphorylation by the dual-specific phosphatase XCL100 enhanced the mitotic process. In the present studies, high levels of ERK phosphorylation may have served as a compensatory mechanism, mediating the block in G2/M progression by DADS.
ERK activity fluctuates during the G2/M transition with activation occurring early followed by severe inactivation in mitosis (37). Sustained activation of ERK has been shown to block G2/M progression (38,39). Elevations in ERK activity after exposure to 100 and 500 µmol/L DADS may account for the increased ability of these concentrations to block HCT-15 cells in the G2/M phase. Because exposure to these high concentrations of DADS (100 and 500 µmol/L) is also associated with apoptosis (19), the elevations in ERK activity observed in the present study may also represent early apoptotic events.
Utilization of cDNA array technology proved to be a powerful tool for examining the effects of DADS on the expression of genes involved in HCT-15 tumorigenesis. To our knowledge, the present studies are the first to provide a comprehensive overview of the genetic events accompanying the block in G2/M progression by DADS. Moreover, consistent with its ability to block cell cycle progression, DADS exposure was found to modify the expression of several cell cycle proteins (Tables 1, and 2). cDNA expression data revealed that DADS suppressed the expression of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 6 (cdk6) and the p19INK4 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, whereas it up-regulated cell division control protein 2 (cdc2), cdk2, cdk3, cdk4 and cyclin E. These up-regulations indicate that both G1- and G2-specific cyclin-dependent kinases are affected by DADS exposure. Whether these changes in transcription result in increased protein expression, however, is unclear. Our previous studies showed that DADS inhibited p34cdc2 complex expression and phosphorylation without altering cdc2 protein levels (21). Clearly, genetic and post-translational modifications both appear to play important roles in mediating the antitumorigenic effects of DADS.
Data generated using cDNA array technology reveal that the antiproliferative effects of DADS also relate to alterations in cellular matrix gene expression. Specifically, DADS exposure down-regulated the expression of aggrecan 1, tenascin R, vitronectin and cadherin 5, whereas it up-regulated 40S ribosomal protein SA, platelet-derived growth factor-associated protein, and glia-derived neurite-promoting factor levels. These changes in matrix protein expression likely reflect depressions in cellular adhesion because decreased adhesion was observed in human colon tumor (HT-29) cells exposed to allyl sulfide (50 µmol/L) (40) and DADS (100 µmol/L) (41). Recently, Franz et al. (42) reported that the increase in HT-29 cell detachment by garlic relates to increased epidermal growth factor receptor and integrin-
6 mRNA expression. Suppressions in integrin-mediated adhesion have also been found to correspond to the ability of ajoene to inhibit viral adhesion and platelet aggregation (43,44). Whether suppressions in integrin-mediated adhesion also account for the antitumorigenic effects associated with DADS remains to be determined because integrin expressions in the present study were below detection levels. The ability to determine changes in integrin expression in these studies may have been precluded by the examination of a single time after exposure. Additional studies are required to characterize more fully the changes in gene expression patterns that are critical in explaining the block in G2/M progression.
Unfortunately, ERK, PKC and CAM KII cDNAs were not present on the arrays used in the current studies. Nevertheless, cDNA expression analysis did find that DADS exposure induces a marked increase (12.87-fold) in macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression (Table 1). Although the exact nature of MIF up-regulation by DADS is unclear, studies by Mitchell et al. (45) showed that the release of MIF by NIH/3T3 cells culminates in ERK phosphorylation and activation. Consequently, the induction of MIF expression by DADS may be associated with the compounds effect on ERK activation. Additional studies are warranted to characterize the effects of DADS on MIF release and determine its effect on ERK activation and cell cycle arrest.
In summary, the present studies revealed that the block in G2/M progression occurring in response to DADS precedes detectable changes in proliferation. Changes in PKC or CAM KII did not accompany DADS exposure; however, elevations in ERK activity and ERK phosphorylation were observed. The ability of DADS to modify HCT-15 tumor proliferation also related to changes in the expressions of several genes involved in tumorigenesis. Identifying these and other targets for DADS will assist in clarifying the mechanisms accounting for its antitumorigenic benefits.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported in part by grants 97-35200-4679 and 97-36215-5191 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: CAMK II, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase; cdc2, cell division control protein 2; cdk6, cyclin-dependent protein kinase 6; DADS, diallyl disulfide; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; PKC, protein kinase C; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. ![]()
Manuscript received 30 April 2003. Initial review completed 30 May 2003. Revision accepted 20 June 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. American Cancer Society (2000) Cancer Facts & Figures 2000 ACS Atlanta, GA.
2. Block, E. (1992) The organosulfur chemistry of the genius Alliumimplications for the organic chemistry of sulfur. Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 31:1135-1178.
3. Fleischauer, A. T., Poole, C. & Arab, L. (2000) Garlic consumption and cancer prevention: meta-analyses of colorectal and stomach cancers. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72:1047-1052.
4. Wargovich, M. J. (1987) Diallyl sulfide, a flavor component of garlic (Allium sativum), inhibits dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 8:487-489.
5. Sumiyoshi, H. & Wargovich, M. J. (1990) Chemoprevention of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice by naturally occurring organosulfur compounds. Cancer Res. 50:5084-5087.
6. Reddy, B. S., Rao, C. V., Rivenson, A. & Kelloff, G. (1993) Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by organosulfur compounds. Cancer Res. 53:3493-3498.
7. Takahashi, S., Hakoi, K., Yada, H., Hirose, M., Ito, N. & Fukushima, S. (1992) Enhancing effects of diallyl sulfide on hepatocarcinogenesis and inhibitory actions of the related diallyl disulfide on colon and renal carcinogenesis in rats. Carcinogenesis 13:1513-1518.
8. Reddy, B. S. (1996) Chemoprevention of colon cancer by minor dietary constituents and their synthetic analogues. Prev. Med. 25:48-50.[Medline]
9. Sundaram, S. G. & Milner, J. A. (1996) Diallyl disulfide suppresses the growth of human colon tumor cell xenografts in athymic nude mice. J. Nutr. 126:1355-1361.
10. Nakagawa, H., Tsuta, K., Kiuchi, K., Senzaki, H., Tanaka, K., Hioki, K. & Tsubura, A. (2001) Growth inhibitory effects of diallyl disulfide on human breast cancer cell lines. Carcinogenesis 22:891-897.
11. Kyo, E., Uda, N., Kasuga, S. & Itakura, Y. (2001) Immunomodulatory effects of aged garlic extract. J. Nutr. 131:1075S-1079S.
12. Flatt, P. M. & Pietenpol, J. A. (2000) Mechanisms of cell-cycle checkpoints: at the crossroads of carcinogenesis and drug discovery. Drug Metab. Rev. 32:283-305.[Medline]
13. Kaufmann, S. H. & Gores, G. J. (2000) Apoptosis in cancer: cause and cure. Bioessays 22:1007-1017.[Medline]
14. Damiens, E. (2000) Molecular events that regulate cell proliferation: an approach for the development of new anticancer drugs. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 4:219-233.[Medline]
15. Shirin, H., Pinto, J. T., Kawabata, Y., Soh, J. W., Delohery, T., Moss, S. F., Murty, V., Rivlin, R. S., Holt, P. R. & Weinstein, I. B. (2001) Antiproliferative effects of S-allylmercaptocysteine on colon cancer cells when tested alone or in combination with sulindac sulfide. Cancer Res. 61:725-731.
16. Sigounas, G., Hooker, J. L., Li, W., Anagnostou, A. & Steiner, M. (1997) S-Allylmercaptocysteine, a stable thioallyl compound, induces apoptosis in erythroleukemia cell lines. Nutr. Cancer 28:153-159.[Medline]
17. Zheng, S., Yang, H., Zhang, S., Wang, X., Yu, L., Lu, J. & Li, J. (1997) Initial study on naturally occurring products from traditional Chinese herbs and vegetables for chemoprevention. J. Cell. Biochem. 27(Suppl.):106-112.
18. Hong, Y. S., Ham, Y. A., Choi, J. H. & Kim, J. (2000) Effects of allyl sulfur compounds and garlic extract on the expression of Bcl-2, Bax, and p53 in non small cell lung cancer cell lines. Exp. Mol. Med. 32:127-134.[Medline]
19. Sundaram, S. G. & Milner, J. A. (1996) Diallyl disulfide induces apoptosis of human colon tumor cells. Carcinogenesis 17:669-673.
20. Knowles, L. M. & Milner, J. A. (1998) Depressed p34cdc2 kinase activity and G2/M phase arrest induced by diallyl disulfide in HCT-15 cells. Nutr. Cancer 30:169-174.[Medline]
21. Knowles, L. M. & Milner, J. A. (2000) Diallyl disulfide inhibits p34(cdc2) kinase activity through changes in complex formation and phosphorylation. Carcinogenesis 21:1129-1134.
22. Nurse, P. (1990) Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature (Lond.) 344:503-508.[Medline]
23. Johnson, L. N., Lowe, E. D., Noble, M. E. & Owen, D. J. (1998) The Eleventh Datta Lecture. The structural basis for substrate recognition and control by protein kinases. FEBS Lett. 430:1-11.[Medline]
24. Huang, C. Y. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr (1996) Dependence of Mos-induced Cdc2 activation on MAP kinase function in a cell-free system. EMBO J. 15:2169-2173.[Medline]
25. Fishman, D. D., Segal, S. & Livneh, E. (1998) The role of protein kinase C in G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle [review]. Int. J. Oncol. 12:181-186.[Medline]
26. Thompson, L. J. & Fields, A. P. (1996) ßII protein kinase C is required for the G2/M phase transition of cell cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 271:15045-15053.
27. Lu, K. P. & Means, A. R. (1993) Regulation of the cell cycle by calcium and calmodulin. Endocr. Rev. 14:40-58.[Medline]
28. Sundaram, S. G. & Milner, J. A. (1993) Impact of organosulfur compounds in garlic on canine mammary tumor cells in culture. Cancer Lett. 74:85-90.[Medline]
29. Stein, G. & Stein, J. (1989) Cell synchronization. Busherga, R. eds. Cell Growth and Division: A Practical Approach 1989:133-137 IRL/Oxford University Press Oxford, UK. .
30. Genschel, J., Littman, S. J., Drummond, J. T. & Modrich, P. (1998) Isolation of MutSbeta from human cells and comparison of the mismatch repair specificities of MutSbeta and MutSalpha. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19895-19901.
31. Homfray, T. F., Cottrell, S. E., Ilyas, M., Rowan, A., Talbot, I. C., Bodmer, W. F. & Tomlinson, I. P. (1998) Defects in mismatch repair occur after APC mutations in the pathogenesis of sporadic colorectal tumours. Hum. Mutat. 11:114-120.[Medline]
32. Chinery, R., Brockman, J. A., Peeler, M. O., Shyr, Y., Beauchamp, R. D. & Coffey, R. J. (1997) Antioxidants enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer: a p53-independent induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 via C/EBPß. Nat. Med. 3:1233-1241.[Medline]
33. Nakano, M., Aoki, K., Matsumoto, N., Ohnami, S., Hatanaka, K., Hibi, T., Terada, M. & Yoshida, T. (2001) Suppression of colorectal cancer growth using an adenovirus vector expressing an antisense K-ras RNA. Mol. Ther. 3:491-499.[Medline]
34. Rendu, F., Daveloose, D., Debouzy, J. C., Bourdeau, N., Levy-Toledano, S., Jain, M. K. & Apitz-Castro, R. (1989) Ajoene, the antiplatelet compound derived from garlic, specifically inhibits platelet release reaction by affecting the plasma membrane internal microviscosity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 38:1321-1328.[Medline]
35. Apitz-Castro, R., Jain, M. K., Bartoli, F., Ledezma, E., Ruiz, M. C. & Salas, R. (1991) Evidence for direct coupling of primary agonist-receptor interaction to the exposure of functional IIb-IIIa complexes in human blood platelets. Results from studies with the antiplatelet compound ajoene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1094:269-280.[Medline]
36. Wang, X. M., Zhai, Y. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr (1997) A role for mitogen-activated protein kinase in the spindle assembly checkpoint in XTC cells. J. Cell Biol. 137:433-443.
37. Hayne, C., Tzivion, G. & Luo, Z. (2000) Raf-1/MEK/MAPK pathway is necessary for the G2/M transition induced by nocodazole. J. Biol. Chem. 275:31876-31882.
38. Walter, S. A., Guadagno, T. M. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr (1997) Induction of a G2-phase arrest in Xenopus egg extracts by activation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:2157-2169.
39. Bitangcol, J. C., Chau, A. S., Stadnick, E., Lohka, M. J., Dicken, B. & Shibuya, E. K. (1998) Activation of the p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibits Cdc2 activation and entry into M-phase in cycling Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:451-467.
40. Kirlin, W. G., Cai, J., DeLong, M. J., Patten, E. J. & Jones, D. P. (1999) Dietary compounds that induce cancer preventive phase 2 enzymes activate apoptosis at comparable doses in HT29 colon carcinoma cells. J. Nutr. 129:1827-1835.
41. Robert, V., Mouille, B., Mayeur, C., Michaud, M. & Blachier, F. (2001) Effects of the garlic compound diallyl disulfide on the metabolism, adherence and cell cycle of HT-29 colon carcinoma cells: evidence of sensitive and resistant sub-populations. Carcinogenesis 22:1155-1161.
42. Frantz, D. J., Hughes, B. G., Nelson, D. R., Murray, B. K. & Christensen, M. J. (2000) Cell cycle arrest and differential gene expression in HT-29 cells exposed to an aqueous garlic extract. Nutr. Cancer 38:255-264.[Medline]
43. Tatarintsev, A. V., Vrzheshch, P. V., Schegolev, A. A., Yershov, D. E., Turgiev, A. S., Varfolomeyev, S. D., Kornilayeva, G. V., Makarova, T. V. & Karamov, E. V. (1992) Ajoene antagonizes integrin-dependent processes in HIV-infected T-lymphoblasts [letter]. AIDS 6:1215-1217.[Medline]
44. Apitz-Castro, R., Ledezma, E., Escalante, J. & Jain, M. K. (1986) The molecular basis of the antiplatelet action of ajoene: direct interaction with the fibrinogen receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 141:145-150 [published erratum appears in Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 144: 1348].[Medline]
45. Mitchell, R. A., Metz, C. N., Peng, T. & Bucala, R. (1999) Sustained mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 activation by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Regulatory role in cell proliferation and glucocorticoid action. J. Biol. Chem. 274:18100-18106.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. N. T. Ngo, D. B. Williams, L. Cobiac, and R. J. Head Does Garlic Reduce Risk of Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review J. Nutr., October 1, 2007; 137(10): 2264 - 2269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Hagos, R. E. Carroll, T. Kouznetsova, Q. Li, V. Toader, P. A. Fernandez, S. M. Swanson, and G. R.J. Thatcher Colon cancer chemoprevention by a novel NO chimera that shows anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative activity in vitro and in vivo Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2007; 6(8): 2230 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Milner Preclinical Perspectives on Garlic and Cancer J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 827S - 831S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Pinto, B. F. Krasnikov, and A. J. L. Cooper Redox-Sensitive Proteins Are Potential Targets of Garlic-Derived Mercaptocysteine Derivatives J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 835S - 841S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Matsuura, Y. Miyamae, K. Yamane, Y. Nagao, Y. Hamada, N. Kawaguchi, T. Katsuki, K. Hirata, S.-I. Sumi, and H. Ishikawa Aged Garlic Extract Inhibits Angiogenesis and Proliferation of Colorectal Carcinoma Cells J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 842S - 846S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Druesne, A. Pagniez, C. Mayeur, M. Thomas, C. Cherbuy, P.-H. Duee, P. Martel, and C. Chaumontet Diallyl disulfide (DADS) increases histone acetylation and p21waf1/cip1 expression in human colon tumor cell lines Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2004; 25(7): 1227 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||