Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renwick, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Renwick, A. G.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:2031S-2033S, June 2003


Supplement: 2nd Amino Acid Workshop

The Safety Testing of Amino Acids1

Andrew G. Renwick2

Clinical Pharmacology Group, University of Southampton, Biomedical Sciences Building, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: agr{at}soton.ac.uk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The risk assessment of compounds added to foods or taken as supplements is usually based on hazard characterization studies performed in animal test species. A large default uncertainty factor, or margin or exposure, is usually required to allow for possible species differences and human variability in the toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of the compound. The development of biomarkers offers the potential to rationalize the risk assessment of amino acids, and to refine the extrapolation of data from animals to humans. The use of high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy applied to readily accessible biological fluids, such as urine and plasma, offers great potential for the identification of toxicologically relevant biomarkers in animal studies that can then be applied to studies in humans.


KEY WORDS: • amino acids • risk assessment • biomarkers • metabonomics • toxicokinetics

There is a well-established paradigm for the characterization of risks associated with the ingestion of chemicals in food or in the diet (1). Although risk assessment is an iterative process, it is usually considered to consist of four principal components:

i) hazard identification, in which the adverse effects (hazards) that can be produced by the chemical are investigated; hazard identification usually involves in vitro investigations and high dose in vivo studies in experimental animals,
ii) hazard characterization, in which the relevance of the detected adverse effects to humans is considered, and the dose-response relationship is assessed,
iii) exposure assessment, in which the predicted human intake is determined, and
iv) risk characterization, which integrates hazard characterization and exposure assessment to determine a level of exposure that would be without a significant risk, or the risk associated with a specific level of exposure.
Substances that are approved for intentional addition to the human diet, or are permitted as residues in the human diet, produce adverse effects via threshold mechanisms; i.e. the dose-response relationships show intake levels below which there would not be any risk. Compounds where a threshold in the dose-response relationship cannot be assumed, for example genotoxic carcinogens, would not be approved as food additives or pesticides. For food additives and pesticides, hazard characterization has to be based primarily on in vitro investigations and in vivo studies in animals, because only limited data are usually available from studies in humans. A critical part of the dose-response assessment and hazard characterization is determination of an intake level that can be given to experimental animals without producing adverse effects (the so-called No Observed Adverse Effect Level or NOAEL)3. However, although the NOAEL is a dose without adverse effects in experimental animals under the conditions of the experiment, there are a number of uncertainties in the use of such data for predicting safe levels of human exposure (2). The principal areas of uncertainty are interspecies differences and human variability, and these differences are allowed for by the application of a 100-fold uncertainty factor. The 100-fold uncertainty factor comprises a 10-fold factor to allow for species differences in response and a second factor of 10 to allow for human variability. Each 10-fold factor has to allow for differences in toxicokinetics, the delivery of the compound to its site of action, and toxicodynamics, the inherent target organ response to the presence of the compound (3). The resulting health-based guidance value for humans is usually termed an acceptable daily intake (ADI), tolerable daily intake (TDI) or reference dose (RfD), and is calculated as the NOAEL, expressed in mg/kg body weight, divided by the uncertainty factor.

In contrast to food additives and pesticides, there is an extensive database on the biodisposition and effects of amino acids in humans, although the majority of the data relate to the nutritional consequences of deficiency and not the potential for adverse effects. When data from studies in humans are available on the safety of doses of single amino acids, then these would be used for hazard characterization, and the safe dose in humans would be based on these human data. There have been numerous studies in experimental animals in which diets containing excess or inadequate levels of specific amino acids have been investigated; however these have been designed to investigate nutritional and/or metabolic consequences and not the possible adverse effects at high doses. There are well-defined procedures necessary for hazard identification and characterization using in vitro studies and studies in experimental animals with defined methods for the numbers of animals, tissue sampling and histopathological techniques that are necessary to ensure that the results are suitable for hazard characterization (46).

Despite the enormous database available related to the biological effects of amino acids in humans and animals, hazard identification and characterization related to the intake of specific amino acids are likely to have to rely on animal studies undertaken specifically for risk assessment purposes. A critical consideration for amino acids will be an assessment of the adequacy of the uncertainty factor that is applied to establish a "safe intake", or the adequacy of the "margin of safety" between the NOAEL and the anticipated human exposure. The application of the usual default uncertainty factor of 100 to the NOAEL for an adverse effect is likely to give an "approved" intake of the amino acid that would be devoid of any biological activities, and if applied to the total intake could result in deficiency of an essential amino acid.

A problem in the risk assessment of single amino acids, or mixtures of amino acids, added to foods or used as food supplements, is likely to be the determination of an adequate margin of safety, and its scientific justification. Data to assist in defining species differences and/or human variability in toxicokinetics and/or toxicodynamics will be important in the justification of lower than normal margins of safety. The development of toxicokinetic or toxicodynamic information relevant to human risk assessment requires the generation of data from studies in humans, either in vitro or in vivo, to reduce the uncertainties associated with either interspecies extrapolation or human variability. Obviously any studies in humans will be restricted to nontoxic doses, and must conform to the safety standards inherent in the Phase I studies on pharmaceutical compounds.

One possible approach that could provide data that would clarify the extrapolation processes would be the development of suitable biomarker data.

Risk assessment using the amino acid or its metabolite as biomarkers that correlate with the dose-response for the adverse effect detected in animal studies

Relating any adverse effects detected, for example in 90-d animal studies, to changes in biomarkers would provide a scientific basis for the replacement of the default uncertainty factor by a more logical and compound-specific assessment factor.

The biomarker would have to be studied at a range of doses in animals, including intakes producing the adverse effect, so that the dose-response for changes for the biomarker could be correlated with the dose-response for the adverse effect. To show that changes in the biomarker represented a surrogate for the adverse effect, the biomarker would need to be studied under conditions that affected the toxicity of the amino acid, for example different species, routes etc. Understanding the mode of action of the amino acid in producing the adverse effect could be used to support the validity of the biomarker.

An essential part of the use of biomarker data would be the need for data from closely related studies in humans, but at the anticipated intake/dose levels. This would necessitate the development of biomarkers in readily accessible body fluids such as urine or plasma (7).

Any changes in the metabolism and plasma kinetics of the amino acid with increase in dose in animals, from nontoxic to toxic doses, should be studied. Changes from linear to nonlinear kinetics may reflect saturation of metabolic pathways (8). An abnormal pattern of metabolites at high doses could be responsible for the adverse effect; alternatively, saturation of the metabolic process per se may be the cause of the adverse effect via changes in other substrates, in which case the abnormal pattern of metabolites would represent a biomarker of saturation. When the adverse effect is associated with nonlinear kinetics, then the plasma or urinary concentrations of the amino acid itself and/or its metabolites may be sufficient to act as a biomarker of the adverse effect. If nonlinearity is established in animals, and it is related to the adverse effect, then definition of the linear kinetic range in humans would provide considerable understanding about the adequacy of any available margin of safety.

However, if the metabolism and kinetics are linear, then plasma or urinary concentrations of the amino acid itself and/or its metabolites will simply be biomarkers of exposure and/or internal dose, and cannot be related to the adverse effect. Under such circumstances, a more comprehensive analysis of metabolic status may help to identify a toxicologically relevant biomarker. Metabonomic studies provide the prospect of developing biomarkers that can be used to define species differences and also to investigate human variability. Because amino acids are normal body constituents, there will be normal variability between healthy adults, and this variability can provide a context for the interpretation of any altered profiles detected after dosage with a single amino acid.

The use of metabonomics to define biomarkers in animal and human studies, for use in risk assessment

The great advantage of metabonomics over genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics is that it could be applied to in vivo studies in humans and the monitoring of changes in animals over relevant dose ranges. There is a developing literature on metabonomics which indicates that it might be of potential value in the risk assessment of amino acids.

Application of high resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) at 600 MHz or 750 MHz has been used to define the changes in urinary parameters in experimental animals under a variety of experimental conditions. A major advantage of the use of such technologies is that a special formulation of the amino acid would not be needed and the signals would represent the total amino acid, both endogenous plus exogenous.

Application of 1H-NMR has been used to define the changes in urinary parameters after toxic doses of chemicals in experimental animals. Published examples include changes in plasma amino acids and urinary excretion products after uranyl nitrate in rats (9), hydrazine in rats (10,11), paracetamol in rats (12) and ifosfamide in humans (13,14), and well as studies on known hepato- and nephro-toxins (1517).

The technique can be adapted to study changes in tissue samples such as liver and kidney (18,19), testes (20) and adrenal (21) in addition to urine and plasma. Such data from in vitro mechanistic studies and in vivo studies in animals would be of value in defining the underlying metabolic basis for the use of the biomarker. 1H-NMR has been applied to study subtle differences such as strain differences in metabolism (22), the influence of exercise and hydration in humans (23) and the influence of the oestrous cycle (24). However, the technique requires sophisticated instrumentation, and the 1H-NMR spectra are very complex; each contains many thousands of resonances with a high dynamic range. Consistent methods of pattern recognition (25,26) and of reducing this wealth of data to manageable proportions are essential (23).

The technique holds great potential in relation to amino acids, and it has been used to study inborn errors amino acid of metabolism (2729), the effects of Alzheimer's disease on the amino acids in the cerebrospinal fluid (30), and dystrophic tissue in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (31).

Overall, the application of 1H-NMR techniques to urine and plasma offers a rapid method of developing biomarkers of adverse effects and of changes in amino acid homeostasis.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The risk characterization procedures that are used to assess the safety of compounds such as food additives may not be readily applicable to high intakes of individual amino acids. Adequate hazard identification requires the use of established toxicological testing protocols, such as 90-d feeding studies performed to good laboratory practice, to ensure that all potentially relevant adverse effects are recognized. Dosage selection will need to take into account possible nutritional imbalances that would not occur at lower intakes. The use of large uncertainty factors, which are a normal part of hazard characterization for threshold effects, might lead to a conclusion that greater than normal intakes of an amino acid may not be appropriate. Greater understanding of the dose-response relationships for any high dose metabolic changes could provide a rationale for the use of lower than normal uncertainty factors. High resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers a valuable method for identifying and defining metabolic abnormalities produced by high doses of individual amino acids in animal feeding studies. Related studies at lower doses in humans would refine hazard characterization, and could justify the use of low uncertainty factors.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented at the conference "The Second Workshop on the Assessment of Adequate Intake of Dietary Amino Acids" held October 31–November 1, 2002, in Honolulu, Hawaii. The conference was sponsored by the International Council on Amino Acid Science. The Workshop Organizing Committee included Vernon R. Young, Yuzo Hayashi, Luc Cynober and Motoni Kadowaki. Conference proceedings were published in a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Guest editors for the supplement publication were Dennis M. Bier, Luc Cynober, Yuzo Hayashi and Motoni Kadowaki. Back

3 Abbreviations used: ADI, acceptable daily intake; 1-NMR, proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NOAEL, no observed adverse effect level; RfD, reference dose; TDI, tolerable daily intake. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Smith, M. (2002) Food safety in Europe (FOSIE): risk assessment of chemicals in food and diet: overall introduction. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 141–144.[Medline]

2. Edler, L., Poirier, K., Dourson, M., Kleiner, J., Mileson, B., Nordmann, H., Renwick, A., Slob, W., Walton, K. & Wurtzen, G. (2002) Mathematical modelling and quantitative methods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 283–326.[Medline]

3. Renwick, A. G. (1999) Exposure estimation, toxicological requirements and risk assessment. In: International Food Safety Handbook (van der Heijden, K., Younes, M., Fishbein L., Miller S., eds.), pp. 59–94. Marcel Dekker, New York.

4. Eisenbrand, G., Pool-Zobel, B., Baker, V., Balls, M., Blaauboer, B. J., Boobis, A., Carere, A., Kevekordes, S., Lhuguenot, J.-C., Pieters, R. & Kleiner, J. (2002) Methods of in vitro toxicology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 193–236.[Medline]

5. Barlow, S. M., Grieg, J. B., Bridges, J. W., Carere, A., Carpy, A. J. M., Galli, C. L., Kleiner, J., Knudsen, I., Koëter, H. B. W. M., Levy, L. S., Madsen, C., Mayer, S., Narbonne, J.-F., Pfannkuch, F., Prodanchuk, M. G., Smith, M. R. & Steinberg, P. (2002) Hazard identification by methods of animal-based toxicology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 145–191.[Medline]

6. Dybing, E., Doe, J., Groten, J., Kleiner, J., O'Brien, J., Renwick, A. G., Schlatter, J., Steinberg, P., Tritscher, A., Walker, R. & Younes, M. (2002) Hazard characterisation of chemicals in food and diet: dose response, mechanisms and extrapolation issues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40: 237–282.[Medline]

7. Renwick, A. G. & Walton, K. (2001) The use of surrogate endpoints to assess potential toxicity in humans. Toxicol. Lett. 120: 97–110.[Medline]

8. Renwick, A. G. (2000) Toxicokinetics: Pharmacokinetics in toxicology. In: Principles and Methods of Toxicology (Hayes, A. W., ed.), pp. 137–191. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.

9. Anthony, M. L., Gartland, K. P., Beddell, C. R., Lindon, J. C. & Nicholson, J. K. (1994) Studies of the biochemical toxicology of uranyl nitrate in the rat. Arch. Toxicol. 68: 43–53.[Medline]

10. Holmes, E., Nicholls, A. W., Lindon, J. C., Connor, S. C., Connelly, J. C., Haselden, J. N., Damment, S. J., Spraul, M., Neidig, P. & Nicholson, J. K. (2000) Chemometric models for toxicity classification based on NMR spectra of biofluids. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 13: 471–478.[Medline]

11. Nicholls, A. W., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., Shockcor, J. P., Farrant, R. D., Haselden, J. N., Damment, S. J., Waterfield, C. J. & Nicholson, J. K. (2001) Metabonomic investigations into hydrazine toxicity in the rat. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14: 975–987.[Medline]

12. Ghauri, F. Y., McLean, A. E., Beales, D., Wilson, I. D. & Nicholson, J. K. (1993) Induction of 5-oxoprolinuria in the rat following chronic feeding with N-acetyl 4-aminophenol (paracetamol). Biochem. Pharmacol. 46: 953–957.[Medline]

13. Foxall, P. J., Lenz, E. M., Lindon, J. C., Neild, G. H., Wilson, I. D. & Nicholson, J. K. (1996) Nuclear magnetic resonance and high-performance liquid chromatography-nuclear magnetic resonance studies on the toxicity and metabolism of ifosfamide. Ther. Drug Monit. 18: 498–505.[Medline]

14. Foxall, P. J., Singer, J. M., Hartley, J. M., Neild, G. H., Lapsley, M., Nicholson, J. K. & Souhami, R. L. (1997) Urinary proton magnetic resonance studies of early ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity and encephalopathy. Clin. Cancer Res. 3: 1507–1518.[Abstract]

15. Gartland, K. P., Bonner, F. W. & Nicholson, J. K. (1989) Investigations into the biochemical effects of region-specific nephrotoxins. Mol. Pharmacol. 35: 242–250.[Abstract]

16. Beckwith-Hall, B. M., Nicholson, J. K., Nicholls, A. W., Foxall, P. J., Lindon, J. C., Connor, S. C., Abdi, M., Connelly, J. & Holmes, E. (1998) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and principal components analysis investigations into biochemical effects of three model hepatotoxins. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11: 260–272.[Medline]

17. Robertson, D. G., Reily, M. D., Sigler, R. E., Wells, D. F., Paterson, D. A. & Braden, T. K. (2000) Metabonomics: evaluation of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and pattern recognition technology for rapid in vivo screening of liver and kidney toxicants. Toxicol. Sci. 57: 326–337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Waters, N. J., Garrod, S., Farrant, R. D., Haselden, J. N., Connor, S. C., Connelly, J., Lindon, J. C., Holmes, E. & Nicholson, J. K. (2000) High-resolution magic angle spinning (1)H NMR spectroscopy of intact liver and kidney: optimization of sample preparation procedures and biochemical stability of tissue during spectral acquisition. Anal. Biochem. 282: 16–23.[Medline]

19. Garrod, S., Humpher, E., Connor, S. C., Connelly, J. C., Spraul, M., Nicholson, J. K. & Holmes, E. (2001) High-resolution (1)H NMR and magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopic investigation of the biochemical effects of 2-bromoethanamine in intact renal and hepatic tissue. Magn. Reson. Med. 45: 781–790.[Medline]

20. Griffin, J. L., Troke, J., Walker, L. A., Shore, R. F., Lindon, J. C. & Nicholson, J. K. (2000) The biochemical profile of rat testicular tissue as measured by magic angle spinning 1H NMR spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 486: 225–229.[Medline]

21. Garrod, S., Humpfer, E., Spraul, M., Connor, S. C., Polley, S., Connelly, J., Lindon, J. C., Nicholson, J. K. & Holmes, E. (1999) High-resolution magic angle spinning 1H NMR spectroscopic studies on intact rat renal cortex and medulla. Magn. Reson. Med. 41: 1108–1118.[Medline]

22. Gavaghan, C. L., Holmes, E., Lenz, E., Wilson, I. D. & Nicholson, J. K. (2000) An NMR-based metabonomic approach to investigate the biochemical consequences of genetic strain differences: application to the C57BL10J and Alpk:ApfCD mouse. FEBS Lett. 484: 169–174.[Medline]

23. Holmes, E., Foxall, P. J., Nicholson, J. K., Neild, G. H., Brown, S. M., Beddell, C. R., Sweatman, B. C., Rahr, E., Lindon, J. C. & Spraul, M. (1994) Automatic data reduction and pattern recognition methods for analysis of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of human urine from normal and pathological states. Anal. Biochem. 220: 284–296.[Medline]

24. Bollard, M. E., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., Mitchell, S. C., Branstetter, D., Zhang, W. & Nicholson, J. K. (2001) Investigations into biochemical changes due to diurnal variation and estrus cycle in female rats using high-resolution (1)H NMR spectroscopy of urine and pattern recognition. Anal. Biochem. 295: 194–202.[Medline]

25. Gartland, K. P., Sanins, S. M., Nicholson, J. K., Sweatman, B. C., Beddell, C. R. & Lindon, J. C. (1990) Pattern recognition analysis of high resolution 1H NMR spectra of urine. A nonlinear mapping approach to the classification of toxicological data. NMR Biomed. 3: 166–172.[Medline]

26. Holmes, E., Nicholls, A. W., Lindon, J. C., Ramos, S., Spraul, M., Neidig, P., Connor, S. C., Connelly, J., Damment, S. J., Haselden, J. & Nicholson, J. K. (1998) Development of a model for classification of toxin-induced lesions using 1H NMR spectroscopy of urine combined with pattern recognition. NMR Biomed. 11: 235–244.[Medline]

27. Kodama, S., Sugiura, M., Nakao, H., Kobayashi, K., Miyoshi, M., Yoshii, K., Komatsu, M. & Sakurai, T. (1991) 1H-NMR studies of urine in propionic acidemia and methylmalonic acidemia. Acta Paediatr. Jpn. 33: 139–145.[Medline]

28. Burns, S. P. & Iles, R. A. (1993) An investigation of argininosuccinic acid anhydrides in argininosuccinic acid lyase deficiency by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Clin. Chim. Acta 221: 1–13.[Medline]

29. Holmes, E., Foxall, P. J., Spraul, M., Farrant, R. D., Nicholson, J. K. & Lindon, J. C. (1997) 750 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy characterisation of the complex metabolic pattern of urine from patients with inborn errors of metabolism: 2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria and maple syrup urine disease. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 15: 1647–1659.[Medline]

30. Ghauri, F. Y., Nicholson, J. K., Sweatman, B. C., Wood, J., Beddell, C. R., Lindon, J. C. & Cairns, N. J. (1993) NMR spectroscopy of human post mortem cerebrospinal fluid: distinction of Alzheimer's disease from control using pattern recognition and statistics. NMR Biomed. 6: 163–167.[Medline]

31. Griffin, J. L., Williams, H. J., Sang, E., Clarke, K., Rae, C. & Nicholson, J. K. (2001) Metabolic profiling of genetic disorders: a multitissue (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and pattern recognition study into dystrophic tissue. Anal. Biochem. 293: 16–21.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. Cynober
Introduction to the 5th Amino Acid Assessment Workshop.
J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6 Suppl): 1633S - 1635S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Toue, R. Kodama, M. Amao, Y. Kawamata, T. Kimura, and R. Sakai
Screening of Toxicity Biomarkers for Methionine Excess in Rats
J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1716S - 1721S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. M. Rand
Variability in Planning and Assessment: Statistical Considerations and Models
J. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 134(6): 1610S - 1616S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Sakai, M. Miura, M. Amao, R. Kodama, S. Toue, Y. Noguchi, and T. Kimura
Potential Approaches to the Assessment of Amino Acid Adequacy in Rats: A Progress Report
J. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 134(6): 1651S - 1655S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renwick, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Renwick, A. G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]