Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Abstracts

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blum, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.

© 2003 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 133:1244-1249, May 2003


Biochemical and Molecular Actions of Nutrients

Dietary Soy Protein Maintains Some Indices of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Formation in Aged Ovariectomized Rats

Stephanie C. Blum, Susanne N. Heaton, Beth M. Bowman, Maren Hegsted* and Scott C. Miller2

Division of Foods and Nutrition and Division of Radiobiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT and * School of Human Ecology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA

2To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: scott.miller{at}hsc.utah.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been used to prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. However, HRT may increase the incidence of some cancers and has other side effects. There is considerable interest in dietary alternatives that include the consumption of soy and isoflavones derived from soy. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of dietary soy protein on bone density, formation and resorption in cortical and cancellous bone in aged, ovariectomized rats. Specific emphasis was placed on indices of bone formation. Rats were assigned to the following groups: baseline; sham surgery + casein diet; sham + soy protein diet; ovariectomy (Ovx) + casein diet; Ovx + soy protein diet. The diets were fed for 3 mo. The Ovx Soy group had a greater bone mineral density (BMD) than the Ovx Casein group. There was a trend (P < 0.10) for greater periosteal bone formation rates in the Sham Soy compared with the Sham Casein group. In the Ovx Soy group, indices of endocortical bone formation were greater than those of the Ovx Casein group. There were no significant differences in resorption indices or endochondral growth (bone elongation) rates with soy in either the Sham or Ovx groups. In cancellous bone, the double-labeled surface and bone formation rates were greater in the Ovx Soy group than in the Ovx Casein group. These results show that dietary soy had a beneficial effect on the preservation of BMD associated with estrogen deficiency bone loss in aged rats. These data also show that at the tissue level, soy functions in a manner different from estrogen by increasing or sustaining elevated bone formation rates after ovariectomy.


KEY WORDS: • soy protein • bone formation • bone density • rats • ovariectomy

Osteoporosis is an age-related disease characterized by loss of bone mass and deterioration of the architecture of bone tissue, resulting in increased bone fragility (1 ,2 ). Postmenopausal women are most at risk for osteoporosis, and the loss is associated with reductions in estrogen levels as the result of the cessation of menses (3 ). Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been used for many years to slow the development of osteoporosis and help alleviate other menopausal symptoms. Traditional HRT can be quite effective in reducing the loss of bone at all skeletal sites, particularly within the first few years after menopause (4 ,5 ). There is, however, mounting evidence that HRT may be linked with greater risks for some diseases including cancer, coronary vascular disease (6 ) and thromboembolism (7 ). For these reasons, alternatives to traditional HRT are sought.

The consumption of plant-based foods rich in "phytoestrogens," more specifically the isoflavones and their derivatives, may provide an alternative to traditional HRT. The largest concentrations of naturally occurring isoflavones are found in common legumes, particularly soy. The consumption of soy is reported to have beneficial cardiovascular effects including improved lipid profiles and reduced cholesterol in both clinical (8 ) and animal (9 ) studies. Additionally, the consumption of isoflavone-rich foods or soy extract has also been associated with a reduction in postmenopausal hot flashes and vaginal dryness (10 ,11 ).

The consumption of soy may also have beneficial effects on skeletal tissues. Dietary soy was found to slow the rate of bone loss after ovariectomy in rats (12 ,13 ), but was unable to restore lost bone mass in established osteopenia in the same animal model (14 ). The tissue mechanisms for the partial preservation of bone mass after ovariectomy were not studied directly, but the authors suggested that the mechanisms might be different than those known for estrogen, perhaps including increases in bone formation. Another study reported improvements in bone strength with dietary soy and attributed this to an increased efficiency of the intestine to absorb calcium (15 ). The conservation of calcium with dietary soy compared with other protein sources may be due to a reduction in the urinary excretion of calcium (16 ).

An increasing number of studies conducted in women have demonstrated increases in bone density or attenuation of bone loss with consumption of greater amounts of soy protein (1721 ). In a recent cross-sectional study, for example, women with the highest intake of dietary isoflavones also had the highest bone mineral density (BMD) measured in the spine (20 ). However, improvements in bone health have not been observed in all studies [reviewed in (22 )]. Additionally, some beneficial effects of dietary soy on serum lipids were reported (23 ,24 ). This has led to considerable discussion whether soy or components of soy, for example, genistein, might be effective alternatives to HRT (25 ). Although the mechanisms of putative bone gains and/or preservation with soy in humans are not well understood, some shorter-term studies have demonstrated decreased urinary markers of resorption associated with soy consumption (19 ,24 ,26 ). Unlike estrogen, which is known to suppress bone formation and resorption (27 ), some human studies have shown that the consumption of soy is associated with increases in serum markers of bone formation (24 ,26 ).

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of dietary soy on indices of bone mass, density, and bone formation and resorption in a rat model of aging and menopause. Thus, diets enriched with soy proteins were fed to aged, retired breeder rats that were either sham operated or ovariectomized. The ovariectomized rat is a model of peri- and postmenopausal bone loss and replicates many aspects of the changes observed in humans (28 ). Because there is biochemical evidence in some animal models and humans that dietary soy may stimulate bone formation, emphasis was placed on the direct tissue measurements of bone formation in both cancellous and cortical bone.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Animals and diets.

Female, retired breeder Sprague-Dawley rats (Harland Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used in this study. The rats had 9 previous reproductive cycles and were ~11 mo of age at the beginning of the study. The rats were fed a casein or soy diet (Table 1) based on the AIN rodent diet (AIN-93M) (#110951, DYETS, Bethlehem, PA) (29 ). The vitamin mix used in both diets was the AIN-93 mix (#310025, DYETS,). The AIN-93M mineral mix was used for the casein diet (#210050, DYETS,) whereas a mineral mix adjusted for the mineral content of soy protein was used in the soy diet (#210057, DYETS,). The soy-based diet was a gift from Protein Technologies, San Diego, CA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Composition of soy and casein diets

 
Eight rats were randomly selected to serve as intact, untreated baseline controls. This group provided the baseline data on skeletal mass, structure and dynamics to permit determination of changes in the sham-operated and ovariectomized rats during the experiment. These rats were given an intraperitoneal injection of calcein (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) at a dose of 10 mg/kg body wt 12 d before necropsy and another injection of oxytetracycline-hydrochloride (Durvet, Blue Springs, MI) at a dose of 25 mg/kg body wt 2 d before necropsy. The calcein and tetracycline serve as fluorescent bone markers for histomorphometric evaluation of bone formation indices. The necropsy of the baseline rats was conducted at the beginning of the experimental period.

The remaining rats were divided into 4 groups (n = 9/group). The rats in two of the groups were ovariectomized and the rats in the other 2 groups were sham operated. The absence of ovarian tissue and atrophy of the uterine horns later confirmed the success of the ovariectomy (Ovx). The rats were further divided into the following groups: sham rats fed the casein-based diet (Sham Casein), sham rats fed the soy-based diet (Sham Soy), ovariectomized rats fed the casein-based diet (Ovx Casein) and ovariectomized rats fed the soy diet (Ovx Soy). The rats were fed the diets and tap water and the study continued for 14 wk. Food consumption and body weight were measured every week.

At 12 and 2 d before necropsy, all of the rats were given calcein and tetracycline as bone markers, respectively, as described above for the baseline group. At necropsy, the uterus, abdominal fat, tibias, humerii and femurs were collected. The length and weight of the uterus and weight of the abdominal fat were measured. The weight of the uterus was normalized to its length.

Preparation of skeletal tissues.

The femurs and humerii were wrapped in saline-soaked gauze and immediately frozen and stored at -70°C. The tibias were cut in half through the mid-diaphyseal shaft and fixed for 24 h in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffered formalin. The tissues were then dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Frontal sections of the proximal tibia and cross sections at the tibiofibular junction were cut on a low speed saw (Isomet, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL), mounted on plastic slides and ground to ~30 µm in thickness.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry.

To measure BMD, the frozen femurs and humerii were scanned using a peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (Norland Medical Systems, Fort Atkinson, WI). The BMD was determined for the entire femur, the proximal and distal femur, mid-diaphysis of the femur, the entire humerus and the proximal humerus. The CV on repeated scans and standards was <1.0%.

Histomorphometry of cortical bone.

Cortical bone histomorphometric indices were measured at the tibiofibular junction as previously described (30 ). The primary indices included the total periosteal and endocortical perimeter, bone area, cortical width, marrow area, periosteal and endocortical single- and double-labeled surface, interlabel width and endocortical resorption (eroded) surface. Calculated from these measurements were the percentage of double-labeled surface, mineral apposition rates and surface-referent bone formation rates. The bone formation rates were calculated using the double-labeled surface. The histomorphometric nomenclature conforms with recommendations by Parfitt et al. (31 ).

Histomorphometry of cancellous bone.

Structural and dynamic histomorphometric data were measured in the cancellous bone of the proximal tibial metaphysis, as previously described (32 ). A 6-mm2 area of cancellous bone in the proximal tibial metaphyseal secondary spongiosa was quantified using a digitizing tablet and histomorphometry software (KSS Scientific Consultants, Magna, UT). The proximal boundary of the measured area was the junction of the primary and secondary spongiosa. The primary indices included the trabecular bone perimeter, trabecular area, single- and double-labeled surface, and interlabel width. From these measurements, the percentage of double-labeled surface, the percentage of mineralizing surface, mineral apposition rate, and surface- and volume-referent bone formation rates were calculated. The mineral apposition rate was corrected for obliquity (33 ), and bone formation calculations were made using the double-labeled surface (31 ).

Statistical analyses.

The baseline group was included to determine the influence of aging and Ovx during the study and to provide basal values of bone mass, structure and dynamics. The baseline, casein control (Sham casein) and casein ovariectomy (Ovx Casein) groups were first compared by an ANOVA followed by Fishers protected least significant difference post-hoc test (StatView, Cary, NC). The specific effects of soy compared with the casein diet control were compared independently in the Ovx groups (Ovx Soy compared with Ovx Casein) and sham groups (Sham Soy compared with Sham Casein) using a one-tailed Student’s t test. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05, but statistical trends (P < 0.10) are also indicated. The data are expressed as the means ± SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The final body weight was greater in the Ovx Casein group than in the Sham Casein and Baseline groups (Table 2). The abdominal fat weight was greater in the Ovx Casein group than the Sham Casein, whereas the uterine weight normalized for length was less in the Ovx Casein than in the Sham Casein and Baseline groups. These indices did not differ in the groups fed the soy-based diets compared with their respective casein diet controls. Food intakes due to diet did not differ in the sham and Ovx groups (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Body weights, content of abdominal fat and uterine weight in female, retired-breeder Sprague-Dawley rats at the beginning of the study (Baseline) and in ovariectomized (Ovx) or Sham-operated rats fed casein- or soy-based diets1

 
The BMD in the whole femurs as well as the proximal, mid-diaphyseal shaft and distal femur was significantly less in the Ovx Casein group compared with both the Sham Casein and the Baseline groups (Table 3). The BMD was significantly greater at all bone regions in the Ovx rats fed the soy diet compared with those fed the casein diet. BMD did not differ in the sham rats fed soy compared with their casein-fed controls. Similar differences also occurred in the BMD measurements of the humerii (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Bone mineral density of the whole femur, the proximal femur and the distal femur metaphysis in female, retired-breeder Sprague-Dawley rats at the beginning of the study (Baseline) and in ovariectomized (Ovx) or Sham-operated rats fed casein- or soy-based diets1

 
There were no significant differences in the cortical bone areas or cortical widths, measured at the tibiofibular junction, between the soy- and casein-fed rats in either the sham operated or ovariectomized groups (data not shown). The Sham Soy group had a significantly greater periosteal percentage of double-labeled surface and tended (P < 0.1) to have a greater periosteal bone formation rate than the Sham Casein group (Table 4). The Ovx Soy group had significantly greater endocortical double-labeled surface, mineral appositional rate and bone formation rate than the Ovx Casein group. The endocortical eroded surface (resorption surface) was greater in the Ovx Casein and Sham Casein groups compared with the Baseline group, but the soy-fed groups and their respective controls did not differ.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Cortical bone morphometry and bone formation rates measured at the tibiofibular junction in female, retired-breeder Sprague-Dawley rats at the beginning of the study (Baseline) and in ovariectomized (Ovx) or Sham-operated rats fed casein- or soy-based diets1

 
The Sham Casein group had a significantly slower endochondral (longitudinal) growth rate than the Baseline controls (Table 5). The Ovx Casein group had a significantly greater endochondral growth rate than the Sham Casein group. Soy did not affect endochondral growth in either the sham or the Ovx groups. The percentage of double-labeled and mineralizing surface and surface- and volume-referent bone formation rates were significantly greater in the Ovx Casein group than in the Sham Casein group. None of the indices of cancellous bone formation differed in the Sham Soy compared with the Sham Casein groups. However, in the Ovx groups, the percentages of double-labeled surface and surface-referent bone formation rates were significantly greater in the soy group than in the casein group. There was a trend (P < 0.1) toward a greater volume-referent bone formation rate in the Oxv Soy compared with the Ovx Casein group. Although the cancellous bone volume did decrease as the result of the ovariectomy, no significant differences could be attributed to the soy diets (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5 Longitudinal (endochondral growth) and cancellous bone formation rates measured at the proximal tibial metaphysis in female, retired-breeder Sprague-Dawley rats at the beginning of the study (Baseline) and in ovariectomized (Ovx) or Sham-operated rats fed casein- or soy-based diets1

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This study demonstrates some preservation of BMD in both cancellous and cortical bone compartments after Ovx-induced bone loss in aged, retired breeder rats fed a soy-based diet for 14 wk. In these rats, there were also significantly greater indices of bone formation measured at endocortical surfaces of the diaphyseal cortical bone and endosteal surfaces of cancellous bone. BMD did not differ in sham-operated intact rats fed the soy diet compared with the casein diet, but some indices of periosteal bone formation were elevated in the soy-fed rats.

The ability of dietary soy to increase and/or maintain indices of bone formation in rats has been suggested in some studies, but not measured directly. Arjmandi et al. (12 ,14 ) suggested that a stimulation and/or sustained maintenance of bone formation rather than inhibition of bone resorption may be responsible for positive changes in bone mass in ovariectomized rats fed soy protein. The results from the present study support this. This same group also showed that the synthetic phytoestrogen, ipriflavone, protected bone mass in ovariectomized rats perhaps by increasing the rates of bone formation (34 ). Ipriflavone is reported to have some bone-sparing properties in postmenopausal women (35 ). Genistein is one of the primary phytoestrogens in soy; when it is given by subcutaneous injection to ovariectomized rats, it slowed the rate of bone loss and promoted bone formation rates (36 ). Increases in serum indices of bone formation with dietary soy have been observed in some (19 ,26 ) but not all (37 ) human studies. The findings that soy and some of its components may stimulate bone formation are supported by several in vitro studies. Choi et al. (38 ) reported that soybean extracts promote anabolic functions of osteoblast-like cells, and Yamaguchi et al. (39 ) reported that genistein and daidzein stimulated protein synthesis in osteoblastic-like cells in vitro. Recently, phosphorylated genistein and daidzein were reported to be anabolic for bone tissues in vitro (40 ).

The ability of dietary soy to sustain and/or increase some indices of bone formation, as demonstrated in the present study and supported by other animal, human and in vitro studies, differs from the normal actions of estrogens in mammalian bone. Estrogen administration suppresses bone formation and resorption in the ovariectomized rat model (41 ) and is also associated with suppressed bone turnover in humans (27 ). Additionally, estrogen also suppresses endochondral bone elongation (41 ), and no effects of soy on endochondral growth were observed in the present study. Other investigators have noted some differences between the skeletal effects of "phytoestrogens" and classical estrogen effects and have suggested that these may act through different mechanisms in bone (13 ). The finding in the present study that dietary soy appears to increase and/or maintain some indices of bone formation indicates a different tissue-level mechanism of action than the classical estrogen effects in bone. That phytoestrogens and estrogen may act differently in bone is supported by some molecular studies that have examined the binding of soy components to the estrogen receptor (ER). The ER is thought to exist as two subtypes, ER-ß and ER-{alpha}. These subtypes differ in the C-terminal and the N-terminal ligands. Studies have found that some phytoestrogens, including genistein, are ER-ß selective and bind to ER-ß with a greater affinity than estradiol, indicating that the phytoestrogens may exert their effects through actions separate and distinct from those of classical estrogens (42 ). This is supported by a study that showed that the binding of genistein to the ER differed from estradiol but was nearly identical to selective ER modulators (SERM) (43 ). These findings led to the recent suggestion that soy isoflavones should not be considered as "phytoestrogens," but rather as natural SERM (44 ).

The aged, retired-breeder rats used in this study had been through multiple reproductive cycles, which can have profound effects on bone structure and dynamics in female rats (45 ). For example, after a reproductive cycle, there is a period of intense bone formation at certain bone envelopes to reconstitute the skeletal mass lost during lactation. The higher rates of periosteal bone formation, for example, in the Baseline group compared with the Sham Casein control, can be attributed to the more recent recovery from lactation in the Baseline rats. This would also explain the smaller endocortical eroded (resorption) surfaces in the Baseline compared with the Sham Casein rats. The periosteal bone formation rates in the Sham Soy group were significantly greater than their Sham Casein controls, but were less than those observed in the Baseline group. Thus, in this case, dietary soy may have maintained the elevated bone formation rates that are associated with recovery from the reproductive cycle.

Ovx is also associated with transient increases of bone formation and bone turnover at different bone envelopes (46 ). On endosteal surfaces, increases in bone formation are countered by greater increases in bone resorption, resulting in decreased bone mass. The soy-based diet resulted in significantly greater bone formation rates at the endocortical and endosteal surfaces in the Ovx rats than in their casein diet counterparts. Because Ovx can increase bone formation rates at these surfaces, the soy diet maintained the elevated bone formation rates or perhaps actually increased these rates. Ovx is also associated with a transient increase in bone resorption that exceeds bone formation. In the present study, no significant differences in eroded surfaces were observed at the end of the study (14 wk), but a longitudinal study would be required to determine whether soy could blunt the increase in bone resorption that occurs soon after Ovx. That dietary soy may blunt bone resorption is supported by clinical measurements from several relatively shorter-term human studies (24 ,26 ). Thus, the ability of soy to blunt increases in bone resorption after Ovx and contribute to the maintenance of bone mass cannot yet be excluded.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates some beneficial effects of dietary soy on skeletal tissues in a model of estrogen-deficiency bone loss. The feeding of soy protein for 14 wk had a beneficial but not complete effect on maintaining cortical and cancellous BMD after Ovx in the aged, retired breeder rat. Dietary soy was also associated with modest, but significantly greater indices of bone formation in certain bone envelopes in both intact and Ovx rats. The ability of dietary soy to increase and/or maintain bone formation rates is a mechanism of action that is different from classical estrogen effects in bone, suggesting that phytoestrogens act through different mechanisms in bone than estrogen. The results from this study support previous animal and humans studies that dietary soy has some beneficial effects on skeletal mass and metabolism and may offer an alternative to traditional HRT. It would be of interest to further define those components of soy that promote the bone formation/maintenance response observed in this study.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The soy protein formulated in the diet was a gift from Protein Technologies. We thank T. Hill, K. McDonald, S. Warner and K. Hart for technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grant AR44806 from the National Institutes of Health. Back

3 Abbreviations used: BMD, bone mineral density; ER, estrogen receptor; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; Ovx, ovariectomy; SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator. Back

Manuscript received 26 December 2002. Initial review completed 28 January 2003. Revision accepted 14 February 2003.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 94:646-650.[Medline]

2. Cauley, J., Thompson, D., Ensrud, K., Scott, J. & Black, D. (2000) Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 11:556-561.[Medline]

3. Marcus, R. (1996) The nature of osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81:1-5.[Medline]

4. O’Connell, D., Robertson, J., Henry, D. & Gillespie, W. (1998) A systemical review of the skeletal effects of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. II. An assessment of treatment effects. Climacteric 1:112-123.[Medline]

5. Wells, G., Tugwell, P., Shea, B., Guyatt, G., Peterson, J., Zytaruk, N., Robinson, V., Henry, D., O’Connell, D. & Cranney, A. (2002) The Osteoporosis Methodology Group, and The Osteoporosis Research Advisory Group. V. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of hormone replacement therapy in treating and preventing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Endocr. Rev. 23:529-539.[Free Full Text]

6. Rossouw, J. E., Anderson, G. L., Prentice, R. L., LaCroix, A. Z., Kooperberg, C., Stefanick, M. L., Jackson, R. D., Beresford, S. A., Howard, B. V., Johnson, K. C., Kotchen, J. M. & Ockene, J. (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 17:321-333.

7. Hulley, S., Furberg, C., Barrett-Connor, E., Cauley, J., Grady, D., Haskell, W., Knopp, R., Lowery, M., Satterfield, S., Schrott, H., Vittinghoff, E. & Hunninghake, D. (2002) Noncardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288:58-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Bakhit, R. M., Klein, B. P., Essex-Sorlie, D., Ham, J. O., Erdman, J. W., Jr & Potter, S. M. (1994) Intake of 25 g of soybean protein with or without soybean fiber alters plasma lipids in men with elevated cholesterol concentrations. J. Nutr. 124:213-222.

9. Greaves, K. A., Parks, J. S. & Williams, J. K. (1999) Intact dietary soy protein, but not adding an isoflavone-rich soy extract to casein, improves plasma lipids in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. J. Nutr. 129:1585-1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. NAMS Consensus Opinion (2000) The role of isoflavones in menopausal health: consensus opinion of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 7:215-229.[Medline]

11. Scambia, G., Mango, D., Signorile, P. G., Angeli, R. A., Palena, C., Gallo, D., Bombardelli, E., Morazzoni, P., Riva, A. & Mancuso, S. (2000) Clinical effects of a standardized soy extract in postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Menopause 7:105-111.[Medline]

12. Arjmandi, B. H., Alakel, L., Hollis, B. W., Amin, D., Stacewics-Sapuntzalis, M., Guo, P. & Kukreja, S. E. (1996) Dietary soybean protein prevents bone loss in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. J. Nutr. 126:161-167.

13. Harrison, E., Adjei, A., Ameho, C., Yamamoto, S. Y. & Kono, S. (1998) The effect of soybean protein on bone loss in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 44:257-268.

14. Arjmandi, B. H., Getlinger, M. J., Goyal, N. V., Alekel, L., Hasler, C. M., Juma, S., Drum, M. L., Hollis, B. W. & Kukreja, S. C. (1998) Role of soy protein with normal or reduced isoflavone content in reversing bone loss induced by ovarian hormone deficiency in rats. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:1358S-1363S.[Abstract]

15. Omi, N., Aoi, S., Murata, K. & Ezawa, I. (1994) Evaluation of the effect of soybean milk and soybean milk peptide on bone metabolism in the rat model with ovariectomized osteoporosis. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 40:201-211.

16. Messina, M. & Messina, V. (2000) Soyfoods, soybean isoflavones, and bone health: a brief overview. J. Ren. Nutr. 10:63-68.[Medline]

17. Potter, S. M., Baum, J. A., Teng, H., Stillman, R. J., Shay, N. F. & Erdman, J. W., Jr (1998) Soy protein and isoflavones: their effects on blood lipids and bone density in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68:1375S-1379S.[Abstract]

18. Alekel, D. L., Germain, A. S., Peterson, C. T., Hanson, K. B., Stewart, J. W. & Toda, T. (2000) (2000) Isoflavone-rich soy protein isolate attenuates bone loss in the lumbar spine of perimenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72:844-852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Chiechi, L., Secreto, G., D’Amore, M., Fanelli, M., Venturelli, E., Cantatore, F., Valerio, T., Laselva, G. & Loizzi, P. (2002) Efficacy of a soy rich diet in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis: the Menfis randomized trial. Maturitas 42:295-300.[Medline]

20. Kritz-Silverstein, D. & Goodman-Gruen, D. L. (2002) Usual dietary isoflavone intake, bone mineral density, and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women. J. Womens Health Gend. Based Med. 11:69-78.[Medline]

21. Ho, S. C., Chan, S. G., Yi, Q., Wong, E. & Leung, P. C. (2001) Soy intake and the maintenance of peak bone mass in Hong Kong Chinese women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:1363-1369.[Medline]

22. Messina, M., Gardner, C. & Barnes, S. (2002) Gaining insight into the health effects of soy but a long way still to go: commentary on the Fourth International Symposium on the role of soy in preventing and treating chronic disease. J. Nutr. 132:547S-551S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Goodman-Gruen, D. & Kritz-Silverstein, D. (2001) Usual dietary isoflavone intake is associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. 131:1202-1206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Uesugi, T., Fukui, Y. & Yamori, Y. (2002) Beneficial effects of soybean isoflavone supplementation on bone metabolism and serum lipids in postmenopausal Japanese women: a four-week study. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21:97-102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Albertazzi, P. (2002) Purified phytoestrogens in postmenopausal bone health: is there a role for genistein?. Climacteric 5:190-196.[Medline]

26. Scheiber, M. D., Liu, J. H., Subbiah, M. T., Rebar, R. W. & Setchell, K. D. (2001) Dietary inclusion of whole soy foods results in significant reductions in clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in normal postmenopausal women. Menopause 8:384-392.[Medline]

27. Turner, R. T., Riggs, B. L. & Spelsberg, T. C. (1994) Skeletal effects of estrogen. Endocr. Rev. 15:275-300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Miller, S. C., Bowman, B. M. & Jee, W.S.S. (1995) Available animal models of osteopenia—small and large. Bone 17:117S-123S.[Medline]

29. Reeves, P. G., Nielsen, F. H. & Fahey, G. C., Jr (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76 rodent diet. J. Nutr. 123:1939-1951.

30. Bagi, C. M., Mecham, M., Weiss, J. & Miller, S. C. (1993) Comparative morphometric changes in rat cortical bone following ovariectomy and/or immobilization. Bone 14:877-883.[Medline]

31. Parfitt, A. M., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., Kanis, J. A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P. J., Ott, S. M. & Recker, R. P. (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR histomorphometry nomenclature committee. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2:595-610.[Medline]

32. Miller, S. C. & Bowman, B. M. (1998) Comparison of bone loss during normal lactation with estrogen deficiency osteopenia and immobilization osteopenia in the rat. Anat. Rec. 251:265-274.[Medline]

33. Frost, H. M. (1983) Bone histomorphometry: analysis of trabecular bone dynamics. Recker, R. eds. Bone Histomorphometry, Techniques and Interpretation 1983:109-131 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL. .

34. Arjmandi, B. H., Birnbaum, R. S., Juma, S., Barengolts, E. & Kukreja, S. C. (2000) The synthetic phytoestroen, ipriflavone, and estrogen prevent bone loss by different mechanisms. Calcif. Tissue Int. 66:61-65.[Medline]

35. Head, K. A. (1999) Ipriflavone: an important bone-building isflavone. Altern. Med. Rev. 4:10-22.[Medline]

36. Fanti, P, Monier-Faugere, M. C., Geng, Z., Schmidt, J., Morris. P, E, Cohen, D. & Malluche, H. H. (1998) The phytoestrogen genistein reduces bone loss in short-term ovariectomized rats. Osteoporos. Int. 8:274-281.[Medline]

37. Wangen, K. E., Duncan, A. M., Merz-Demlow, B. E., Xu, X., Marcus, R., Phipps, W. R. & Kurzer, M. S. (2000) Effects of soy isoflavones on markers of bone turnover in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 85:3043-3048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Choi, E. M., Suh, K. S., Kim, Y. S., Choue, R. W. & Koo, S. J. (2001) Soybean ethanol extract increases the function of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Phytochemistry 56:733-739.[Medline]

39. Yamaguchi, M. & Sugimoto, E. (2000) Stimulatory effect of genistein and daidzein on protein synthesis in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells: activation of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 214:97-102.[Medline]

40. Yamaguchi, M., Ma, Z. J. & Fushimi, T. (2002) Anabolic effect of phosphogenistein and phosphodaidzein on bone components in rat femoral-metaphyseal tissues in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 20:148-155.[Medline]

41. Coxam, V., Bowman, B. M., Mecham, M., Roth, C. M., Miller, M. A. & Miller, S. C. (1996) Effects of dihydrotestosterone alone and combined with estrogen on bone mineral density, bone growth, and formation rates in ovariectomized rats. Bone 19:107-114.[Medline]

42. Kuiper, G. G., Lemmen, J. G., Carlsson, B., Corton, J. C., Safe, S. H., van der Saag, P. T., van der Burg, B. & Gustafsson, J. A. (1998) Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 139:4252-4263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Pike, A. C., Brzozowski, A. M., Hubbard, R. E., Bonn, T., Thorsell, A. G., Engstrom, O., Ljunggren, J., Gustafsson, J. A. & Carlquist, M. (1999) Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J. 18:4608-4618.[Medline]

44. Setchell, K. D. (2001) Soy isoflavones-benefits and risks from nature’s selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 20(suppl.):354S-362S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Bowman, B. M. & Miller, S. C. (2001) Skeletal adaptations during mammalian reproduction. J. Musculoskel. Neuron Interact. 1:347-355.

46. Miller, S. C., Bowman, B. M., Miller, M. A. & Bagi, C. M. (1991) Calcium absorption and osseous organ-, tissue-, and envelope-specific changes following ovariectomy in rats. Bone 12:439-446.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. M. Cho, N. Peng, J. T. Clark, L. Novak, S. Roysommuti, J. Prasain, and J. M. Wyss
Genistein Attenuates the Hypertensive Effects of Dietary NaCl in Hypertensive Male Rats
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5396 - 5402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blum, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2003 by American Society for Nutrition