![]() |
|
|
2
*
Helen Keller International/Helen Keller WorldwideAsia Pacific Regional Office, Jakarta, Indonesia,
Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands and
**
MOST, the USAID Micronutrient Program, Arlington, VA 22209
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sdepee{at}compuserve.com.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15% of the sampled population. This cut-off should be applied to a representative group of preschool age children (671 mo). Because measurement of low serum retinol concentrations requires high precision, analysis should be done by HPLC. For serum RBP, a cut-off cannot be reliably specified, because available data are too few and too variable. However, because serum RBP concentration correlates well with serum retinol concentration, it can be used to determine whether VAD is a public health problem in those populations for which the relationship between serum concentrations of retinol and RBP have been established. More efforts to establish a reliable cut-off for RBP is warranted, because analysis, in particular radial immunodiffusion (RID), is relatively simple and inexpensive. Whereas HPLC and RID analyses must be done in a laboratory, methods are being developed for assessing serum retinol and RBP under more remote conditions.
KEY WORDS: serum retinol serum retinol-binding protein vitamin A deficiency
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| SERUM RETINOL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum retinol concentration reflects an individuals vitamin A status, particularly when the bodys reserves of vitamin A are limited, because serum retinol concentration is homeostatically controlled and will not drop until body stores are significantly compromised (1
).
However, serum retinol concentration is also affected by factors that affect release of holo-RBP from the liver, infection, protein status, adequacy of other nutrients and organ disease. In general, these factors lower serum retinol concentration (1
3
). Details about the effect of infection on serum retinol concentration are discussed by Thurnham (3
). However, populations with a high prevalence of infection are also more likely to suffer from VAD. The cut-off for serum retinol concentration has been chosen irrespective of the prevalence of infection in a particular population.
Serum retinol is usually assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or spectrophotometry (4
). Although spectrophotometry is much simpler and less costly, it is also much less accurate; therefore, HPLC analysis is preferred. Although many other biochemical indicators of vitamin A status can be assessed (5
), serum retinol is the preferred indicator for population level assessment of VAD because many laboratories can analyze it, and it is the best established biochemical indicator of vitamin A status.
Cut-offs previously proposed
Several different cut-offs previously have been proposed for the prevalence of a low serum retinol concentration among preschool age children that would indicate that VAD is a public health problem in the population surveyed. Initially, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a prevalence of
5% with a serum retinol concentration of <0.35 µmol/L (10 µg/dL) (6
). This was based on its association with the presence of eye signs of VAD. Because accurate determination at this very low concentration requires high analytical precision, and because detecting a prevalence of 5% with reasonable precision requires a large sample size, the International Vitamin A Consultative Group (IVACG) later changed this cut-off to a prevalence of
15% with a concentration of <0.70 µmol/L (20 µg/dL) (7
).
In 1992 an informal WHO working group suggested a more complex classification scheme for serum retinol concentrations of <0.70 µmol/L: mild, 2 to <10% prevalence; moderate, 10 to <20% prevalence; severe public health problem,
20% prevalence (5
). Although this classification might be useful for comparing prevalence rates, it is confusing when the question is whether there is a VAD problem that needs to be combated. Therefore, one cut-off for determining whether VAD is a public health problem will best serve global needs.
Distributions of serum retinol concentration and cut-off chosen
Because a serum retinol concentration of 0.70 µmol/L is a well-recognized cut-off, but 1.05 µmol/L is sometimes proposed as an alternative, prevalence rates below both values were compared in 40 data sets, which were generously shared by groups from around the world (see Fig. 1
). Details about the individual data points and their references are provided in Tables 1
and 2
, respectively. All but two of the data sets were from preschool age children; some encompassed the entire age range from 0 to 71 mo, but most were limited to a narrower range. The smallest data set consisted of 60 children and the largest included 1566 children.
|
|
|
15% (7
HPLC analysis can detect a concentration of <0.70 µmol/L with adequate precision (although this is not the case for spectrophotometric analysis). Because a higher prevalence criterion requires a smaller sample size for similar precision, we assessed whether we could choose instead a higher prevalence rate of a higher serum retinol concentration (<1.05 µmol/L). Figure 1
shows the relationship between the prevalence of serum retinol at <0.70 and <1.05 µmol/L in the same 40 populations.
Despite the obvious correlation between these two criteria, it was decided that a serum concentration of <1.05 µmol/L had three potential limitations. First, there was concern that there might be a larger proportion of false positives (that is, low serum retinol concentration but adequate liver stores) at this higher level. Second, two data sets, one of English and Welsh children under 5, showed a prevalence of >50% for concentrations of <1.05 µmol/L but <15% for concentrations of <0.70 µmol/L; these presumably well-nourished populations would have been classified as having VAD at the <1.05 criterion but not at the <0.70 criterion. Third, using two different criteria for serum retinol would be confusing. Because levels of <0.70 µmol/L were considered the better cut-off but since this is a relatively low concentration, serum retinol concentrations should be measured by HPLC analysis.
There is some concern about the use of a single cut-off across the entire age range of 671 mo. Therefore, we compared the prevalences of low serum retinol concentrations among subgroups of children under 5 from a number of different populations. Figure 2
shows that the prevalence of concentrations of <0.70 µmol/L tended to be lower for children aged 4859 mo than for those aged 1223 mo but that there was no consistency about the exact age when the prevalence was lower. Gregory et al. reported that there was no difference in serum retinol concentration among different age groups of English and Welsh 1.5- to 4.5-y-olds (8
). Because there is evidence that infants <6 mo old have a lower serum retinol concentration than older infants and young children (5
,9
), the cut-off should not be applied to infants <6 mo of age. To facilitate future comparisons, it is recommended that data on serum retinol concentrations be presented as the proportion of the total population that is below the cut-off but also provide the distribution of serum retinol concentrations.
|
| SERUM RBP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum RBP occurs in a 1:1:1 M complex with retinol and transthyretin (10
). Because of the 1:1 complex, serum RBP concentration should reflect serum retinol concentration and therefore might be substituted for it as an indicator of vitamin A status. Assessment of RBP is easier than assessment of serum retinol. First, because RBP is a protein, it can be detected with an immunologic assay, which is simpler and less expensive than HPLC analysis of serum retinol. Second, serum handling is easier because RBP is more stable than retinol with respect to light and temperature. Third, RBP analysis requires a very small amount of serum, 1020 µL, which can be obtained from a finger prick, whereas the amount required for retinol analysis by HPLC is at least 100 µL, which generally requires venous blood.
Despite the theoretical 1:1 M ratio, a cut-off for serum RBP concentration has not been accepted. Not all RBP found in serum is complexed with retinol (holo-RBP), and the proportion that is not (apo-RBP) varies under a range of concentrations. Immunologic assays cannot distinguish between holo- and apo-RBP. Second, the binding of RBP to retinol is influenced by a number of factors such as the presence and degree of acute-phase response, protein energy malnutrition, liver disease, chronic renal failure and acutely stressful situations (for example, just before delivering a baby). Many of these factors also affect serum retinol concentration and therefore may not affect the relationship between serum concentrations of retinol and RBP in a particular population; predicting those in which it does and in which it does not is problematic.
Serum concentrations of RBP and retinol
Two very different cut-offs have been proposed in the past for serum RBP concentrations that would be comparable to a serum retinol concentration of <0.70 µmol/L. Gibson (11
) proposed a cut-off of 1.14 µmol/L (a serum RBP concentration of 1 µmol/L is equivalent to 21 mg/dL), and Bakerman suggested a cut-off of 0.70 µmol/L (12
). The latter assumed 100% saturation of RBP with retinol. Earlier studies, mainly from the early 1970s, that looked at the relationship between serum concentrations of RBP and retinol found correlations between 0.62 and 0.93 (13
15
). However, the method used to measure serum retinol concentration in those studies, fluorometry, was less precise and specific than the currently used HPLC method. Further, cut-offs that would reflect a serum retinol concentration of <0.70 µmol/L were not proposed.
Recently, several groups have proposed cut-offs for serum RBP concentration expected to reflect a serum retinol concentration of <0.70 µmol/L (16
19
). Table 3
presents these findings. The proposed cut-offs cover a wide range from 0.69 µmol/L in 3- to 6-y-old Indonesian children (19
) to 1.29 µmol/L in breast-feeding Indonesian women (16
).
|
Neither Gamble et al. (18
) nor Semba et al. (19
) found evidence for an altered relationship between RBP and retinol related to an acute-phase response.
Cut-off for serum RBP concentration
Because potential and proposed cut-offs varied too greatly (Table 3)
, it is not yet possible to suggest a cut-off for the prevalence of serum RBP concentration that would validly and reproducibly reflect a serum retinol concentration of <0.70 µmol/L. To propose a cut-off in the future, the relationship between serum concentrations of RBP and retinol needs to be determined in more populations with widely varying serum retinol concentrations. At present however, serum RBP concentration, which correlates well with serum retinol concentration, can be used for determining whether VAD is a public health problem when the relationship between serum concentrations of RBP and retinol have been determined in a subsample of the particular population.
| ANALYSIS OF SERUM RETINOL AND SERUM RBP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laboratory methods: serum retinol
Serum retinol can be assessed by fluorometry, spectrophotometry, and HPLC. Fluorometry is rarely used because its specificity is poor. However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA) is working on refining the Futterman laboratory method, which measures fluorescence of the retinol-RBP complex. The main disadvantage to spectrophotometry is similar to that of fluorometry: it has poor specificity, is not very accurate and is difficult to validate especially when frozen serum is used. HPLC analysis is preferred, but it requires well-skilled and well-trained technicians and benefits from interlaboratory comparisons. The need for the latter is illustrated by a recent proficiency test of 16 laboratories in developing countries (12 in Africa, 4 elsewhere), 14 of which used HPLC. Only 7 of these laboratories produced acceptable results for serum retinol concentration (21
). Because a minimum of 100 µL of serum is required for HPLC analysis of serum retinol, blood should be obtained by venipuncture.
Laboratory methods: serum RBP
RBP can be analyzed by immunoassay, which binds the protein to antibodies that can then be detected in a variety of ways. A method that is used only in research laboratories is the radioimmunoassay (RIA), which radioactively labels the antibodies. Another assay, probably the least expensive, is the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in which an enzyme is attached to an antibody that changes the color of a substrate. The intensity of the color change depends on the amount of RBP bound. However, commercial kits are not available for this analysis, and the method requires an optical density reader. Nephelometry is another relatively easy-to-use method, but the machine is expensive. The radial immunodiffusion (RID) test is the easiest for laboratories with limited equipment, and a commercial kit is available. With a micropipette, serum is put into a well on a plate and left to diffuse at room temperature for about 3 d, after which a ring can be observed around the well. The diameter of the ring can be measured using a jewelers eyepiece with a micrometer. A calibration line derived from standards is then used to determine the RBP concentration in the serum tested. Compared with laboratory assessment of serum retinol, the RID test is much simpler, requires a much smaller volume of serum and costs less. The measurement of the diameter makes the method vulnerable to inter-observer error, but that can be minimized when one person determines the diameter of all samples, including the standards.
Blood spot/field methods
Under certain circumstances, collecting blood by venipuncture can be difficult. For example, the community may not accept this practice. Furthermore, a lack of electricity will prevent centrifuging blood to obtain serum and producing ice to keep samples cool/frozen during transport. Therefore, collecting blood by finger prick and either storing it on filter paper for subsequent analysis in a distant laboratory or analyzing it immediately in the field would be much preferred. At present, no such method is available for general use, but efforts to develop such methods are ongoing.
Craft Technologies is developing a method that measures retinol concentration in blood preserved on filter paper, but this requires an optimized HPLC system with a highly sensitive detector because the blood spot contains only 1012 µL of serum (22
,23
). At present, the cost of this analysis is US $15 per sample. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH, Seattle, Washington) and collaborators are developing a method for measuring RBP concentration in blood preserved on filter paper. First results of this enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method were presented at the XX IVACG meeting (24
). The costs of this determination will be approximately USD 0.25 per sample. But, the success of filter paper methods appears to be highly dependent on the kind of filter paper used (25
,26
). Therefore, both groups are also working on a method that could give results immediately in the field.
Craft Technologies is developing a method that quantifies retinol by measuring the fluorescence of holo-RBP (27
). Efforts are now focused on enhancing the sensitivity of this portable fluorometry test. Approximate cost of the method using anti-RBP antibodies will be USD 1 per sample. PATH and collaborators are working on a so-called "RBP dipstick" method that could semiquantitatively assess the RBP concentration in whole blood, using the previously mentioned EIA method (24
). The costs of this method will be approximately USD 0.25 per sample. Both methods will be field tested this year.
When
15% of preschool age children (671 mo) in a population have a serum retinol concentration <0.70 µmol/L, VAD is a public health problem in the population surveyed. Serum retinol concentration has to be analyzed by HPLC.
Serum RBP concentration would also be a very good biochemical indicator for determining whether VAD is a public health problem, because it is much easier to analyze and it correlates well with serum retinol concentration. However, a cut-off cannot yet be proposed, and RBP can therefore only be used for those populations for which the relationship with serum retinol concentration has been determined in a subsample.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: EIA, enzyme immunoassay; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; IVACG, International Vitamin A Consultative Group; PATH, Program for Appropriate Technology in Health; RBP, retinol-binding protein; RIA, radioimmunoassy; RID, radial immunodiffusion; VAD, vitamin A deficiency; WHO, World Health Organization. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Olson, J. A. (1994) Vitamin A, retinoids and carotenoids. Shils, M. E. Olson, J. A. Shike, M. eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease 8th ed. 1994:287-307 Lea & Febiger Philadelphia, PA. .
2. Stephenson, C. & Gildengorin, G. (2000) Serum retinol, the acute phase response, and the apparent misclassification of vitamin A status in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72:1170-1178.
3. Thurnham, D. I. (2001) A Meta-analysis of data from 15 studies to quantify the effects of sub-clinical infection on plasma retinol. Presented at XX IVACG Meeting, Hanoi, Vietnam, February 1215, 2001 2001.
4. Arroyave, G., Chichester, C. O., Flores, H., Glover, J., Mejia, L. A., Olson, J. A., Simpson, K. L. & Underwood, B. A. (1982) Biochemical methodology for the assessment of vitamin A status 1982 IVACG Washington, DC. .
5. WHO/United Nations Childrens Fund (1994) Indicators for assessing vitamin A deficiency and their application in monitoring and evaluating intervention programmes 1994 WHO Geneva, Switzerland. .
6. WHO Technical Report Series 590 1976 WHO Geneva, Switzerland. .
7. Arroyave, G., Baltazar, J., Kusin, J., Lepkowski, J. M., Milton, R. C. & Srikantia, S. G. (1989) Methodologies for monitoring and evaluating vitamin A deficiency intervention programs 1989 IVACG Washington, DC. .
8. Gregory, J. R., Collins, D. L., Davies, P. S. W., Hughes, J. M. & Clarke, P. C. (1995) National diet and nutrition survey of children aged 1.5 to 4.5 years 1995 HMSO London, UK. .
9. WHO/CHD Immunisation-Linked Vitamin A Supplementation Study Group (1998) Randomised trial to assess benefits and safety of vitamin A supplementation linked to immunisation in early infancy. Lancet 352:1257-1263.[Medline]
10. Soprano, D. R. & Blaner, W. S. (1994) Plasma retinol-binding protein. Sporn, M. B. Roberts, A. B. Goodman, D. S. eds. The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine 2nd ed. 1994:257-281 Raven Press New York, NY. .
11. Gibson, R. S. (1990) Principles of Nutritional Assessment 1990 Oxford University Press New York, NY. .
12. Bakerman, S. (1984) ABCs of Interpretive Laboratory Data 2nd ed. 1984 Interpretive Laboratory Data, Inc Greenville, NC. .
13. Smith, F. R., Goodman, D. S., Zaklama, M. S., Gabr, M. K., el-Maraghy, S. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1973) Serum vitamin A, retinol-binding protein, and prealbumin concentrations in protein-calorie malnutrition. I. A function defect in hepatic retinol release. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 26:973-981.[Abstract]
14. Smith, F. R., Goodman, D. S., Arroyave, G. & Viteri, F. (1973) Serum vitamin A, retinol-binding protein, and prealbumin concentrations in protein-calorie malnutrition. II. Treatment including supplemental vitamin A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 26:982-987.[Abstract]
15. Ingenbleek, Y., van den Schrieck, H. G., de Nayer, P. & de Visscher, M. (1975) The role of retinol-binding protein in protein-calorie malnutrition. Metabolism 24:633-641.[Medline]
16. de Pee, S., Yuniar, Y., West, C. E. & Muhilal, (1997) Evaluation of biochemical indicators of vitamin A status in breast-feeding and non-breast-feeding Indonesian women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66:160-167.
17. Almekinder, J., Manda, W., Soko, D., Lan, Y., Hoover, D. R. & Semba, R. D. (2000) Evaluation of plasma retinol-binding protein as a surrogate measure for plasma retinol concentrations. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 60:199-204.[Medline]
18. Gamble, M. V., Ramakrishnan, R., Palafox, N. A., Briand, K., Berglund, L. & Blaner, W. S. (2001) Retinol binding protein as a surrogate measure for serum retinol: studies in vitamin A-deficient children from the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:594-601.
19. Semba, R. D., Yuniar, Y., Gamble, M. V., Natadisastra, G. & Muhilal, (2002) Assessment of vitamin A status of preschool children in Indonesia using plasma retinol-binding protein. J. Trop. Pediatr. 48:84-87.
20. Dijkhuizen, M. A., Wieringa, F. T., West, C. E., Muherdiyantiningsih, & Muhilal, (2001) Concurrent micronutrient deficiencies in lactating mothers and their infants in Indonesia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:786-791.
21. Brouwer, J. T., Hulshof, P. J. M. & West, C. E. (2001) Proficiency test for laboratories measuring retinol and carotenoids in serum, 19992000. Abstract of poster presented at XX IVACG meeting, Hanoi, Vietnam, February 1215, 2001 2001.
22. Oelofse, A., Van Raaij, J. M., Benade, A. J., Dhansay, M. A., Tolboom, J. J. & Hautvast, J. G. (2002) Disadvantaged black and coloured infants in two urban communities in the Western Cape, South Africa differ in micronutrient status. Public Health Nutr. 5:289-294.[Medline]
23. Craft, N. E., Bulux, J., Valdez, C., Li, Y. & Solomons, N. W. (2000) Retinol concentrations in capillary dried blood spots from healthy volunteers: method validation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72:450-454.
24. Hix, J., Shankar, A., Dary, O., Martinez, C., Buchanan, I. & Tam, M. (2001) Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for the detection of retinol binding protein (RBP-EIA). Abstract of poster presented at XX IVACG Meeting, Hanoi, Vietnam, February 1215, 2001 2001.
25. Sari, M., de Pee, S., Martini, E., Herman, S., Sugiatmi, , Bloem, M. W. & Yip, R. (2001) Estimating the prevalence of anaemia: a comparison of three methods. WHO Bull. 79:506-511.
26. Sarma, K. V. R., Sivakumar, B. & Nair, K. M. (2001) Development of a field method for haemoglobin estimation. Abstract of poster presented at 2001 INACG Symposium, Hanoi, Vietnam, February 1516, 2001 2001.
27. van Stuijvenberg, M. E., Dhansay, M. A., Lombard, C. J., Faber, M. & Benade, A. J. (2001) The effect of a biscuit with red palm oil as a source of beta-carotene on the vitamin A status of primary school children: a comparison with beta-carotene from a synthetic source in a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 55:657-662.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Gibson, Y. Abebe, S. Stabler, R. H. Allen, J. E. Westcott, B. J. Stoecker, N. F. Krebs, and K. M. Hambidge Zinc, Gravida, Infection, and Iron, but Not Vitamin B-12 or Folate Status, Predict Hemoglobin during Pregnancy in Southern Ethiopia J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 581 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fujita, E. Brindle, J. Shofer, P. Ndemwa, Y. Kombe, B. Shell-Duncan, and K. A. O'Connor Retinol-Binding Protein Stability in Dried Blood Spots Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1972 - 1975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B Fisker, I. M Lisse, P. Aaby, J. G Erhardt, A. Rodrigues, B. M Bibby, and C. S Benn Effect of vitamin A supplementation with BCG vaccine at birth on vitamin A status at 6 wk and 4 mo of age Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1032 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Gokhale, S. A. Udipi, R. Y. Ambaye, S. K. Pai, and S. H. Advani Post-Therapy Profile of Serum Total Cholesterol, Retinol and Zinc in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 26(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K Tchum, S. A Tanumihardjo, S. Newton, B. de Benoist, S. Owusu-Agyei, F. K. Arthur, and A. Tetteh Evaluation of vitamin A supplementation regimens in Ghanaian postpartum mothers with the use of the modified-relative-dose-response test Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1344 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Gieng and F. J. Rosales Plasma {alpha}1-Acid Glycoprotein Can Be Used to Adjust Inflammation-Induced Hyporetinolemia in Vitamin A-Sufficient, but Not Vitamin A-Deficient or -Supplemented Rats J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1904 - 1909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Winichagoon, J. E. McKenzie, V. Chavasit, T. Pongcharoen, S. Gowachirapant, A. Boonpraderm, M. S. Manger, K. B. Bailey, E. Wasantwisut, and R. S. Gibson A Multimicronutrient-Fortified Seasoning Powder Enhances the Hemoglobin, Zinc, and Iodine Status of Primary School Children in North East Thailand: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Efficacy J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1617 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Surles, J. Li, and S. A. Tanumihardjo The Modified-Relative-Dose-Response Values in Serum and Milk Are Positively Correlated over Time in Lactating Sows with Adequate Vitamin A Status J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 939 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A Thurlow, P. Winichagoon, T. Green, E. Wasantwisut, T. Pongcharoen, K. B Bailey, and R. S Gibson Only a small proportion of anemia in northeast Thai schoolchildren is associated with iron deficiency Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2005; 82(2): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Feart, J Vallortigara, D Higueret, B Gatta, A Tabarin, V Enderlin, P Higueret, and V Pallet Decreased expression of retinoid nuclear receptor (RAR{alpha} and RAR{gamma}) mRNA determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of hypothyroid patients J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 849 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Verhoef and C. E West Validity of the relative-dose-response test and the modified-relative-dose-response test as indicators of vitamin A stores in liver Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 835 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Feart, V Pallet, C Boucheron, D Higueret, S Alfos, L Letenneur, J F Dartigues, and P Higueret Aging affects the retinoic acid and the triiodothyronine nuclear receptor mRNA expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 152(3): 449 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B Zimmermann, R. Wegmueller, C. Zeder, N. Chaouki, R. Biebinger, R. F Hurrell, and E. Windhab Triple fortification of salt with microcapsules of iodine, iron, and vitamin A Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1283 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M Baeten, B. A Richardson, D. D Bankson, M. H Wener, J. K Kreiss, L. Lavreys, K. Mandaliya, J. J Bwayo, and R S. McClelland Use of serum retinol-binding protein for prediction of vitamin A deficiency: effects of HIV-1 infection, protein malnutrition, and the acute phase response Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2004; 79(2): 218 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimura, Y. Nagata, and R. K. Buddington Some Dietary Fibers Increase Elimination of Orally Administered Polychlorinated Biphenyls but Not That of Retinol in Mice J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sommer and F. R. Davidson Assessment and Control of Vitamin A Deficiency: The Annecy Accords J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2845S - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Schultink Use of Under-Five Mortality Rate As an Indicator for Vitamin A Deficiency in a Population J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2881S - 2883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wasantwisut Recommendations for Monitoring and Evaluating Vitamin A Programs: Outcome Indicators J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2940S - 2942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Ramakrishnan and I. Darnton-Hill Assessment and Control of Vitamin A Deficiency Disorders J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2947S - 2953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||