![]() |
|
|

Comparative Nutrition Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX;
* Institute of Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria and
Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Leicestershire, UK
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbauer{at}cvm.tamu.edu.
KEY WORDS: dogs diet home-prepared adequacy nutrients fatty acids
EXPANDED ABSTRACT
Maintaining the health of dogs and cats by feeding wholesome nutritional diets is an important component of responsible pet ownership. Numerous improvements in companion animal nutrition have resulted in a wide array of foods providing complete and balanced nutrition. In spite of these developments, some pet owners prefer preparing food at home for their animals (1). Although owners generally have good intentions, some of them may lack the scientific knowledge or other resources to recognize important nutritional needs of their pets. Thus the potential for nutrient deficiencies, excesses and imbalances exists.
This study was conducted to compare the nutritional adequacy of home-prepared diets in young and adult dogs using data gathered from a population of dogs and their owners in Vienna, Austria. Representative samples of home-prepared diets were analyzed and compared to commercial pet foods and to recommendations set by the American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) (2).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diet and serum data from four groups were analyzed and compared using two-way ANOVA. When significant differences were found, the means were compared using the Bonferroni method of multiple comparisons. When data were available for only the adult and young dog HPD groups these data were compared using two sample t-tests. Chi-square tests for goodness of fit were used to compare diet compositions to those recommended by AAFCO. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were no differences in dietary energy or % fat among any of the diets but all diets had mean values at least 10% greater than AAFCO-recommended values (Table 1). The dogs generally had optimal body condition scores (BCS) of 3 to 3.5 using a 5-point scale, with 3 being optimal and 5 obese. Among 88 dogs examined, only seven (8%) had a BCS above the ideal score of 3 to 3.5 (five in the HPD group and two in the CD group). Average diet protein concentrations were significantly higher in HPD than in CD. The HPD were significantly lower in calcium, phosphorus and Ca:P ratio than that in the respective CD. However, serum PTH concentrations were within normal limits in all cases (data not shown). Compared to the CD groups, the HPD were also lower in fat-soluble vitamins A, D and E. The only exception to these findings was that the Ca:P ratio and vitamin D contents of the young dog HPD were not different compared to those of young dog CD. All serum chemistry profiles and complete blood counts were within normal limits for young dogs and adults in both the HPD and CD groups (data not shown). Differences between the young and adult animals were unremarkable and typically those ascribed to growth and development.
|
|
Dietary essential fatty acid (EFA) contents of the HPD exceeded AAFCO recommendations (Fig. 1) as did the CD and other dry diets studied (data not shown). On an energy basis, the HPD were significantly higher in mean total saturated fat and lower in mean total polyunsaturated fat compared to those of a group of American and Austrian commercial dry extruded type diets. However, saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were not different from canned types from both countries. Relative fatty acid contents of serum phospholipid fractions of HPD-fed dogs were significantly lower in 18:2(n-6) and 20:4(n-6) than those from a population of 37 normal dogs presented to the nutrition laboratory at Texas A&M University (Fig. 2). These latter dogs had been fed one of three American commercial dry extruded type diets from the group of diets reported in Figure 1. Ten out of 35 HPD dogs serum triacylglycerol fractions contained no detectable 18:3(n-3), even though all home-prepared diets contained this fatty acid. Seven of these animals had been fed diets containing the higher amounts of 18:3(n-3) among those analyzed (data not shown).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although all diets were adequate in EFA, the HPD had a wide range of total fat and contained more saturated fatty acids and fewer polyunsaturated fats than those in samples of dry extruded commercial diets. The HPD were more similar in this regard compared with canned diets. This difference may have been attributable to the likelihood that table foods are generally more similar in fat content as source materials used in canned diet production.
It is of interest that serum phospholipid fractions of dogs fed the HPD contained lower 18:2(n-6) and 20:4(n-6) fatty acids compared to those of dogs fed one of three dry, extruded diets. This finding is not unexpected because the commercial dry diets analyzed contained more PUFA on average than did the HPD. Another finding of interest was that in some of the HPD-fed dogs serum triacylglycerol fractions contained no detectable
-linolenic acid, even though the diets contained this fatty acid. This finding and the lower serum phospholipid 18:2(n-6) and 20:4(n-6) together with low dietary vitamin E concentrations in the HPD may be indicative of increased PUFA peroxidation and possible vitamin E depletion. This possibility was not directly examined because serum vitamin E levels were not measured. An additional explanation is that beta-oxidation of dietary
-linolenic acid may have occurred. This fatty acid is generally poorly converted to longer carbon chain (n-3) fatty acids (7,8). Consistent with this latter possibility are the low relative amounts of long-chain (n-3) PUFA in the serum phospholipid fractions, even though in the case of one of the commercial diets fed for this comparison high amounts of
-linolenic acid were present.
Purported risks associated with feeding HPD include the consumption of high energy density diets without increased nutrient density. However, the present study found that both HPD and CD were not different in energy content. In spite of energy content similarities, potential nutritional concerns with HPD were that some macrominerals, fat-soluble vitamins, including antioxidants, and trace minerals, potassium, copper and zinc were below AAFCO recommendations. Thus, these nutrients should be carefully evaluated when considering feeding HPD. Although clinical signs of deficiency were not found in dogs fed the HPD, a sufficient margin of safety above absolute physiological requirements is reflected in the AAFCO values. Also, the study period lasted only 30 d and overt deficiency signs may take longer to develop. It is unknown whether owners had fed home-prepared diets with similar nutrient composition before enrolling their dogs in the study but that is likely the case. However, some individuals may have improved their dogs nutritional status with the knowledge that their efforts were being documented. In any case no overt nutritional deficiencies were observed. Certain nutrients in HPD analyzed in this investigation were clearly below recommended and required amounts. Owners should be made aware of this possibility with HPD feeding, which may place animals at risk for nutrient deficiencies.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported, in part, by Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Leicestershire, UK; The Institute of Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria; Mark L. Morris Professorship in Clinical Nutrition at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: AAFCO, American Association of Feed Control Officials; CD, commercial diets; HPD, home-prepared diets; PTH, parathyroid hormone. ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Freeman, L. M. & Michel, K. E. (2001) Evaluation of raw food diets for dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 218:705-709.[Medline]
2. AAFCO (2000) Official Publication 2000:124-134 Association of American Feed Control Officials Oxford, IN .
3. Dunbar, B. L. & Bauer, J. E. (2002) Conversion of essential fatty acids by delta 6-desaturase in dog liver microsomes. J. Nutr. 132:1701S-1703S.
4. Bauer, J. E., Dunbar, B. L. & Bigley, K. E. (1998) Dietary flaxseed in dogs results in differential transport and metabolism of (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Nutr. 128:2641S-2644S.
5. National Research Council (1974) Nutrient Requirements of Dogs 1974:36 National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council Washington, DC .
6. Richardson, D. C., Zentek, J., Hazewinkel, H. A., Toll, P. A. & Zicker, S. C. (2000) Developmental orthopedic disease of dogs. Hand, M. S. Thatcher, C. D. Remillard, R. L. Roudebush, P. eds. Small Animal Clinical Nutrition 4th ed. 2000:503-504 Mark Morris Institute Topeka, KS .
7. Sinclair, A. J. (1975) The incorporation of radioactive polyunsaturated fatty acids into liver and brain of developing rat. Lipids 10:175-184.[Medline]
8. Adam, A. (1983) Polyenoic fatty acid metabolism and effects on prostaglandin biosynthesis in adults and aged persons. Lands, W.E.M. eds. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Eicosanoids 1983:215-219 American Oil Chemists Society Press Champaign, IL .
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||