Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.
© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:762-767, 2002


Nutritional Epidemiology

Folate Intake, Serum Homocysteine and Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T Genotype Are Not Associated with Oral Cancer Risk in Puerto Rico

Stephanie J. Weinstein1, Gloria Gridley, Lea C. Harty, Scott R. Diehl*, Linda M. Brown, Deborah M. Winn{dagger}, Eleuterio Bravo-Otero** and Richard B. Hayes

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892; * Craniofacial Epidemiology and Genetics Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, MD 20892; {dagger} Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892; and ** University of Puerto Rico School of Dentistry, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: weinstes{at}exchange.nih.gov.

Back


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We examined the relationships between folate and methionine intake, serum homocysteine levels (as a biomarker for folate metabolism), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism genotype and risk of oral cancer in a population-based, case-control study in Puerto Rico. Structured questionnaires were used to collect information on demographic factors, usual adult diet, and tobacco and alcohol use. Oral epithelial cells and blood samples were collected from a subset of subjects. Analyses were conducted by logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, lifetime smoking and lifetime alcohol intake, with the following numbers of cases/controls, respectively: dietary data (341/521); MTHFR genotype (148/149); and homocysteine (60/90). Although increased folate intake was associated with decreased oral cancer risk [adjusted odds ratio (OR) in highest vs. lowest quartile = 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4, 1.0, Ptrend = 0.05)], this finding was due almost entirely to folate intake from fruit (adjusted OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.6; Ptrend = 0.0001), whereas other dietary folate sources showed no clear association. Methionine intake and serum homocysteine levels were not associated with oral cancer risk. Subjects with the MTHFR C677T homozygous variant (TT) genotype had a nonsignificantly lower risk, and risk patterns tended to differ by level of folate, methionine, alcohol intake and smoking, although the power to detect significant associations in subgroups of these variables was low. Risks for oral cancer are not folate specific; preventive recommendations for this disease should emphasize the importance of a healthy diet, including substantial intake of fruits.


KEY WORDS: • folate • homocysteine • methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase • oral cancer • epidemiology


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The incidence of oral cancer (cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx) is higher in Puerto Rico (18.5 per 100,000 men; 4.5 per 100,000 women) (1Citation ) than among Hispanics on the U.S. mainland (8.9 per 100,000 men; 2.7 per 100,000 women) (2Citation ). We recently determined that the attributable risk of oral cancer due to alcohol and tobacco use in Puerto Rico was 76% for men and 52% for women (3Citation ), consistent with results from other localities (4Citation –6Citation ).

In addition to these long-recognized risk factors for oral cancer, dietary patterns may also influence risk for this disease (7Citation ). In particular, several studies have indicated a protective role for fruits and vegetables (8Citation –18Citation ), although the specific agents involved are uncertain. Folates, which have long been hypothesized to be related to cancer risk (19Citation ,20Citation ), are found in a wide variety of foods, particularly green leafy vegetables, grain products and orange juice (21Citation ). Metabolic reactions that require folate are called "one carbon-metabolism" reactions, and include amino acid metabolism, purine and pyrimidine synthesis, and formation of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM),2 the agent primarily responsible for methylation of DNA (22Citation ). Disruption of one-carbon metabolism interferes with DNA synthesis, repair, and methylation, and thus may promote carcinogenesis (20Citation ). Importantly, the major known risk factors for oral cancer, smoking and alcohol use, can negatively influence folate metabolism, suggesting a mechanistic relationship among these factors and cancer risk (23Citation –26Citation ).

To examine a potential link between factors in one-carbon metabolism and oral cancer risk, we evaluated folate intake, serum homocysteine (a sensitive indicator of folate status) (27Citation ) and methionine intake (methionine is converted to homocysteine in the one-carbon metabolism pathway), among participants in a population-based, case-control study of oral cancer in Puerto Rico. We also assayed for the C677T single nucleotide polymorphism in the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), which is necessary for folate metabolism. The T allele reduces MTHFR enzyme activity and elevates plasma homocysteine levels (28Citation ); it has been associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (29Citation –31Citation ) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (32Citation ), and an increased risk of endometrial (33Citation ) and esophageal (34Citation ) cancers.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Through the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry and island pathology laboratories, we ascertained 519 newly incident, histologically confirmed, cases of cancer of the oral cavity (excluding lip and major salivary glands) and pharynx (excluding nasopharynx) [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes 141, 143–146, 148, 149] (35Citation ) diagnosed between December 1, 1992 and February 28, 1995, in Puerto Rican residents aged 21–79 y. Beginning in February 1993, cancers of the major salivary glands (ICD-9 code 142) (35Citation ) were also included. Additional details of the study methods have been previously described (3Citation ,36Citation ).

Population-based control subjects with no history of oral cancer (n = 629) were selected from residents of Puerto Rico by two methods. To achieve an age-sex distribution similar to that of the case subjects, control subjects were selected by using probabilities based on the age-sex profile of oral cancer patients (Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, 1989–1990). For subjects <65 y old (n = 346), male-designated and female-designated households were selected from dwelling unit enumeration, within a two-stage area probability sample. Residents of the selected dwelling units were screened and study controls selected using age- and gender-specific sampling rates to approximate a 1:1 ratio with the cases. Controls aged >=65 y (n = 283) were selected from the rosters of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA, Baltimore, MD) by systematic sampling, after a random start, to approximate the distribution of cases with regard to age (65–69 y, 70–74 y, 75–79 y) and gender. Three separate samplings from HCFA rosters were made during the course of field work, with approximately one third of the required controls identified during each sampling.

After exclusion of cases with cancer of the salivary gland, 341 cases (70% of eligible) and 521 controls (83% of eligible) were interviewed. Reasons for nonparticipation included death or illness (18% of cases, 2% of controls), subject refusal (5%, 8%), and difficulty in locating subjects or subjects had moved (6%, 7%).

At the time of the interview, subjects who lived in the San Juan metropolitan area were asked to provide oral epithelial cell specimens (buccal cells) and blood samples. The subjects who were agreeable later went to the University of Puerto Rico clinic, where a medical technician drew blood and obtained urine and buccal cell specimens. To increase the number of subjects from whom buccal cells were collected, part way through the study, subjects living outside the San Juan area were also asked to provide a buccal cell sample. These samples were collected in the home during the interview. Based on their residence and date of interview, 299 cases and 258 controls were eligible to provide buccal cells for genetic studies. These included all subjects in the San Juan metropolitan area (n = 150 cases/185 controls) as well as subjects outside the San Juan area who were interviewed after 6/28/94 (149 cases/73 controls). A total of 157 cases and 149 controls (53 and 58% of those eligible, respectively) provided buccal cell samples. Reasons for nonparticipation included death or illness (26% of cases, 4% of controls), subject refusal (8%, 24%), difficulty in locating subjects (8%, 14%), physician refusal (2% of cases), and other reasons (3%, 0.4%). Of the 157 cases, 9 subjects with cancer of the salivary gland were excluded from analyses; 13 cases and 3 controls were unable to be typed/missing, leaving 135 cases and 146 controls.

Blood samples were collected only at the clinic at the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan; therefore, only interviewed subjects who resided in the San Juan area (n = 150 cases, 185 controls) were eligible to donate blood samples used for the homocysteine analyses. A total of 66 cases and 91 controls (44 and 49% of those eligible, respectively) provided a blood sample. Reasons for nonparticipation included death or illness (31% of cases, 3% of controls), subject refusal (13%, 35%), difficulty in locating subjects (8%, 12%), physician refusal (0.7% of cases), and other reasons (3%, 0.5%). Excluded from the analyses were four cases with cancer of the salivary gland, one case with an extreme homocysteine concentration (186.12 µmol/L), which was suspected to be due to measurement error, one case with missing information and one control with a missing homocysteine measurement, leaving 60 cases and 90 controls.

Buccal cells were collected by brushing the selected mucosal surfaces with a small cytobrush, followed by a rinse with sterile water (36Citation ). Blood samples were allowed to clot at room temperature for a maximum of 6 h before being centrifuged, and serum samples were stored at -70°C. All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at the National Cancer Institute and the University of Puerto Rico.

Interview data

Trained interviewers used a structured questionnaire to collect detailed information on demographic factors, usual adult diet, and tobacco and alcohol use 1 y before the interview. Diet was assessed through 104 food and beverage frequency questions asking the subject to estimate usual consumption "during most of [their] adult life before one year ago." The food-frequency questionnaire was designed specifically for this study population. One subject (a male case) was excluded due to nonresponse to the entire diet section of the questionnaire. For 134 subjects with incomplete dietary data (11 subjects missing 3–5 food items, and 123 subjects missing 1–2 food items), missing answers were imputed from the median consumption by controls of the same gender. Nutrient indices were computed by multiplying each subject’s food-frequency responses by a matrix of standard portion size and nutrient density estimates derived from USDA food composition tables (37Citation ) for 375 food items, including several USDA food items specific for foods consumed in Puerto Rico. Lifetime smoking was estimated from usual daily number of cigarettes smoked and total years of use. Lifetime alcohol intake was estimated from weekly intake, combining weekday and weekend amounts, and total years of use. One drink was considered equivalent to 42 g liquor (1.5 oz), 118 g of wine (4 oz) or 356 g (12 oz) of beer (3Citation ).

Laboratory analyses

    Homocysteine. Serum homocysteine analyses were conducted using a modification of a HPLC method by Araki and Sako (38Citation ). An equivalent proportion of cases and controls was assayed in each of two batches. Each batch also included eight quality control samples (4 low and 4 high homocysteine level aliquots, masked as to level), which were monitored on the basis of rules of Westgard et al. (39Citation ). The CV was 4.9%, based on repeated measurements of the quality control material using the variance component estimation procedure in SAS (40Citation ).

    MTHFR. A common single nucleotide polymorphism in MTHFR has a cytosine (C) to thymine (T) substitution at nucleotide 677, which results in an amino acid change from alanine to valine (28Citation ). The region surrounding position 677 in the MTHFR gene (National Center for Biotechnology Information Locus ID: 4524) was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, and the alleles were identified through restriction enzyme digestion (41Citation ).

PCR reactions of 15 µL contained 30 ng template genomic DNA and 1.5 U AmpliTaqGold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the following concentrations of reagents: 0.16 µmol/L of each oligonucleotide primer, 1.6 mol/L of each dNTP, 15 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mmol/L KCl and 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2. Reaction conditions were denaturation for 9 min at 95°C followed by 49 cycles at 94°C for 30 s and 62°C for 60 s, with a final extension step at 62°C for 10 min. Verification of amplification was obtained by comparing the 173-bp products with molecular weight standards in a gel made from a combination of 3% GibcoBRL Ultrapure agarose (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and 1.5% NuSieve GTG agarose (BioWhittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, ME) run for 1 h at 150 V and visualized with ethidium bromide. Reaction products (5 µL) were digested for 1 h at 37°C with 2.5 U of Hinf I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in buffer at pH 7.9 of 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L MgCl2, 50 mmol/L NaCl and 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol. Genotypes were determined by analysis of restriction patterns after electrophoresis on agarose gels (as above) with T at position 677 resulting in fragments of 125 and 48 bp in length and with C at position 677 resulting in a single fragment of 173 bp. We refer to the CC genotype as wildtype, the CT genotype as heterozygous variant, and the TT genotype as homozygous variant.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS Version 6.12 and Version 8 for Windows (40Citation ). Correlations were calculated using the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient. Geometric means were calculated by transforming values with the natural logarithm, calculating the mean and then transforming back to standard units.

The odds ratio (OR) was the measure of association used to estimate the relative risk of oral cancer. Folate, methionine, and homocysteine quartiles were based on the frequency distribution among the controls. Unconditional logistic regression was used to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of the OR and a 95% confidence interval (CI), while adjusting for potential confounders (42Citation ). Control for confounding was considered adequate when the addition of a potential confounder or an increase in the number of strata of a confounder did not change the adjusted OR by >=10%. Most OR in the text and tables are adjusted for age (<=65, 66–71, >71 y), sex, lifetime smoking (nonsmoker, <=10,000 packs, >10,000 packs, smoker of tobacco other than cigarettes), and lifetime alcohol intake [nondrinker, <=9647, 9648–42,000, >42,000 drinks (cut-off points are based on tertiles among the controls)]. Because the buccal cell collection differed by place of residence, the MTHFR OR were additionally adjusted for this factor. For models of folate and methionine intake, which had a larger number of subjects, the OR were adjusted with more categories for the confounder variables (age: <=55, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, >75 y; lifetime smoking: nonsmoker, <=5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,001–20,000, >20,000 packs, smoker of tobacco other than cigarettes; lifetime alcohol intake: nondrinker, <= 10,000, 10,001–40,000, 40,001–80,000, >80,000 drinks) to be consistent with our previous publications. This did not materially change the OR compared with models with fewer categories for the confounder variables. The addition of education (<=12 y/high school, >12 y) and income (<$10,000, $10,000–$14,999, $15,000–$19,999, >= $20,000, unknown) did not materially affect the OR; thus, they were not included in the models. To explore subgroup effects, the OR for MTHFR genotype were calculated within strata of folate and methionine intake and lifetime tobacco and alcohol use. Tests for trend were obtained by assigning the score 1–4 to each quartile and treating this categorical variable as continuous. All statistical tests were two-tailed. P < 0.05 or a CI that excluded 1.0 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Cases and controls were similar with respect to sex and place of residence. Cases were significantly older (mean age 63.2 vs. 61.0. P = 0.003) and reported lower incomes and less education. Controls reported less use of tobacco and alcohol. Further details have been published (3Citation ,36Citation ).

When analyzed as total intake from foods, folate was inversely associated with oral cancer risk (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.0 for highest vs. lowest quartile, Table 1Citation ). However, with adjustment for fruit intake, the association disappeared (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.6, 2.2 for highest vs. lowest quartile, Table 1Citation ). We further examined folate intake among nonusers and heavy users of alcohol and tobacco and found no systematic pattern of risk. Methionine intake was not significantly associated with risk (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.9, 2.2 for highest vs. lowest quartile, Table 1Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Oral cancer risk by folate and methionine intake for women and men in Puerto Rico

 
When folate intakes from dairy products, fruits, grains, legumes, meats and vegetables (excluding legumes) were examined separately, only folate derived from fruits showed an inverse association with oral cancer risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.6 for highest vs. lowest quartile, Table 2Citation ). Fruit was the highest contributor to folate intake, with a median folate intake from fruit of 110.1 µg/d. Median folate intakes from the other food groups were as follows: vegetables, 90.72 µg/d; legumes, 60.78 µg/d; dairy, 37.04 µg/d; grains, 31.15 µg/d; and meat, 13.75 µg/d (see Table 2Citation for quartile distributions). The correlation between folate intake and fruit intake was 0.6 among the controls (P < 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Oral cancer risk by folate intake from dairy, fruits, grains, legumes, meats, and vegetables for women and men in Puerto Rico

 
The correlation between folate intake and vitamin C intake was 0.8 (P < 0.0001) among the controls. However, the OR for folate derived from fruit, adjusted for vitamin C derived from fruit, was 0.5 for the highest vs. lowest quartile (95% CI: 0.2, 0.9), whereas the OR in this model for vitamin C derived from fruit was 0.9 for the highest vs. lowest quartile (95% CI: 0.4, 1.7). These data indicate that the inverse association with folate derived from fruit is not due to vitamin C.

Among controls, homocysteine levels were not associated with folate intake (r = -0.1, P = 0.3). The geometric mean homocysteine level tended to be higher in cases, but the difference was not significant (10.6 µmol/L among cases, 9.7 µmol/L among controls, P = 0.1). The unadjusted OR for oral cancer were nonsignificantly elevated with increased homocysteine levels [OR for lowest to highest quartiles were, respectively: 1.0, 1.1, 1.4, 1.8 (95% CI: 0.7, 4.7)]. However, once adjustment was made for age, sex, lifetime smoking and lifetime alcohol intake, the risk was attenuated [OR for lowest to highest quartiles were, respectively: 1.0, 0.8, 1.0, 1.0 (95% CI: 0.3, 3.4)].

The MTHFR homozygous variant (TT) genotype was weakly associated with a decreased oral cancer risk (adjusted OR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2, 1.4, Table 3Citation ). This was true whether the individuals with the homozygous variant genotype were compared with those with the wildtype genotype only, or with those with the heterozygous variant and the wildtype genotypes combined. Geometric mean homocysteine levels did not differ by MTHFR status for either cases or controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Oral cancer risk by methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHFR) C677T genotype for women and men in Puerto Rico

 
We further examined MTHFR genotype stratified by folate intake, methionine intake, lifetime smoking and lifetime alcohol intake. Subjects with the homozygous variant genotype (TT) who fell into the "low risk" group (high consumption of folate or methionine or low levels of lifetime smoking or alcohol intake) tended to have a lower risk of oral cancer than those with the CC and CT genotypes (Table 4)Citation , whereas those in the "high risk" group were not protected by the TT genotype. However, the numbers of subjects in the subgroups were small and none of the OR were significant. Although numbers were even smaller, the association with serum homocysteine followed a similar pattern. Subjects with the TT genotype and the "low risk" characteristic of low homocysteine levels had an OR = 0.3 (95% CI: 0.02, 3.6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4 Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of oral cancer risk by methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHFR) C677T genotype stratified by folate intake, methionine intake, lifetime smoking and lifetime alcohol intake for men and women in Puerto Rico1

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In our population-based, case-control study in Puerto Rico, high folate intake was associated with a significantly reduced risk of oral cancer; however, this seemed to be due solely to fruit intake. We found no associations with folates from other food sources (Table 2)Citation , indicating that a causal association with folate is unlikely. We found no clear pattern of risk for oral cancer with methionine intake or serum homocysteine levels.

Numerous studies have shown a reduced risk of oral cancer with increased fruit and/or vegetable consumption (8Citation –18Citation ), although the evidence is not entirely consistent (43Citation ). Few studies, however, have examined the role of folate specifically. In one study, serum folate levels were significantly decreased in subjects with oral leukoplakias (44Citation ), whereas in another study, folate intake was negatively associated with risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer (45Citation ). Folate was not consistently related to risk in two other studies (9Citation ,46Citation ). Because the observed protective effect of folate in our study was restricted to folate from fruit, the evidence suggests that fruit itself, or some component of fruit, may be the protective factor.

Disruption of one-carbon metabolism interferes with DNA synthesis, repair and methylation, and thus may promote carcinogenesis (20Citation ). Efficient one-carbon metabolism requires adequate levels of folate, as well as several other vitamins, and optimal activity of several enzymes. In one-carbon metabolism, methionine is activated by ATP to form SAM, a methyl donor to DNA, and the by-product of this reaction is hydrolyzed to homocysteine (47Citation ,48Citation ). There are two metabolic pathways for removal of homocysteine. It can be degraded in a reaction requiring vitamin B-6 or it can be converted back to methionine in a reaction requiring vitamin B-12, by accepting a one-carbon group from folate (47Citation ,48Citation ). The MTHFR enzyme provides folate in the proper form for this latter step (22Citation ). Impairment of either pathway by, for example, low folate, B-6 or B-12, or reduced MTHFR activity, can result in the accumulation of homocysteine (28Citation ,48Citation ).

Elevated serum homocysteine levels have been related to colorectal cancer risk as a main effect (49Citation ) and in conjunction with the MTHFR C677T homozygous variant genotype (TT) (50Citation ). Elevated homocysteine has also been related to risk of cervical cancer (51Citation , 52Citation ) and cervical dysplasia (53Citation ), although not consistently (54Citation ). Elevated homocysteine has been inversely (but nonsignificantly) related to pancreatic cancer risk (55Citation ). In the current study, however, we found little evidence for an association between serum homocysteine levels and oral cancer risk. Blood samples were taken after disease onset; therefore, disease could have caused an elevation in homocysteine levels among the cases. However, this type of bias would have resulted in an inflated risk for homocysteine, and we found no evidence of risk. Homocysteine is a sensitive indicator of folate inadequacy (27Citation ), and the lack of an association between homocysteine levels and oral cancer supports the lack of a direct relationship between folate and oral cancer, although the numbers are small.

Subjects with the MTHFR homozygous variant (TT) genotype tended to have reduced risk of oral cancer, although this relationship was not significant. Further, although based on a small number of subjects, those with the homozygous variant genotype and "low risk" characteristics of high consumption of folate or methionine, or low lifetime smoking or alcohol intake tended to have decreased risk of oral cancer. This evidence of potential effect modification will have to be evaluated in larger studies. Interestingly, studies of colorectal adenomas and cancer, with a few exceptions, have found similar effect modification relationships, especially with folate (29Citation –31Citation ,50Citation ,56Citation 60Citation ).

The use of a population-based sampling design was one of the strengths of this study; however, self-selection or survival-related biases, especially for the buccal cell and serum components of the study, may have influenced our findings. Only 53 and 58% of eligible cases and controls, respectively, donated buccal cells used for the MTHFR analysis, and only 44 and 49% of eligible cases and controls, respectively, donated blood used for the homocysteine analysis. We compared those who donated buccal cells and blood with all who were interviewed on age, sex, race, place of residence, education and income, and observed some differences in education and income. However, controlling for education and income did not materially affect the OR. In addition, mean folate intakes were similar (P = 0.9) in the group that was interviewed (396.65 µg/d) and in the subsample that donated biospecimens (395.48 µg/d), indicating that any participation bias in the folate-related analyses would be minimal.

Our major finding is that increased folate intake, although associated with oral cancer, does not appear to be causally linked to this disease. When folate from specific food groups was examined, only folate from fruits was associated with a decreased risk of oral cancer. In addition, serum homocysteine levels, a biomarker for folate status, were not associated with risk. Preventive measures for oral cancer should emphasize the importance of a healthy diet, including substantial intakes of fruits.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Jacob Selhub of the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University for homocysteine analyses, and Lonn Irish and Roy Van Dusen of Information Management Services, for computer support.


    FOOTNOTES
 
2 Abbreviations used: CI, confidence interval; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; OR, odds ratio; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine. Back

Manuscript received 10 September 2001. Initial review completed 16 October 2001. Revision accepted 15 January 2002.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Echevarria Segui, L. E. & Martinez, I. (1993) Cancer in Puerto Rico 1991 1993 Central Cancer Registry of Puerto Rico San Juan, Puerto Rico. .

2. Miller, B. A., Kolonel, L. N., Bernstein, L., Young, J. L., Jr, Swanson, G. M., West, D., Key, C. R., Liff, J. M., Glover, C. S. & Alexander, G. A. (1996) Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988–1992 1996 National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD. .

3. Hayes, R. B., Bravo-Otero, E., Kleinman, D. V., Brown, L. M., Fraumeni, J. F., Jr, Harty, L. C. & Winn, D. M. (1999) Tobacco and alcohol use and oral cancer in Puerto Rico. Cancer Causes Control 10:27-33.[Medline]

4. Blot, W. J., McLaughlin, J. K., Winn, D. M., Austin, D. F., Greenberg, R. S., Preston-Martin, S., Bernstein, L., Schoenberg, J. B., Stemhagen, A. & Fraumeni, J. F., Jr (1988) Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 48:3282-3287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1986) Tobacco smoking.. IARC (Int. Agency Res. Cancer) Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risk Chem. Hum. 1986 IARC Lyon, France. .

6. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1988) Alcohol Drinking.. IARC (Int. Agency Res. Cancer) Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risk Chem. Hum. 1988 IARC Lyon, France. .

7. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research (1997) Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective 1997 AICR Washington, DC. .

8. Winn, D. M., Ziegler, R. G., Pickle, L. W., Gridley, G., Blot, W. J. & Hoover, R. N. (1984) Diet in the etiology of oral and pharyngeal cancer among women from the southern United States. Cancer Res. 44:1216-1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. McLaughlin, J. K., Gridley, G., Block, G., Winn, D. M., Preston-Martin, S., Schoenberg, J. B., Greenberg, R. S., Stemhagen, A., Austin, D. F., Ershow, A. G., Blot, W. J. & Fraumeni, J. F., Jr (1988) Dietary factors in oral and pharyngeal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 80:1237-1243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Gridley, G., McLaughlin, J. K., Block, G., Blot, W. J., Winn, D. M., Greenberg, R. S., Schoenberg, J. B., Preston-Martin, S., Austin, D. F. & Fraumeni, J. F., Jr (1990) Diet and oral and pharyngeal cancer among blacks. Nutr. Cancer 14:219-225.[Medline]

11. Franceschi, S., Bidoli, E., Baron, A. E., Barra, S., Talamini, R., Serraino, D. & La Vecchia, C. (1991) Nutrition and cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx in north-east Italy. Int. J. Cancer 47:20-25.[Medline]

12. La Vecchia, C., Negri, E., D’Avanzo, B., Boyle, P. & Franceschi, S. (1991) Dietary indicators of oral and pharyngeal cancer. Int. J. Epidemiol. 20:39-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Zheng, W., Blot, W. J., Shu, X. O., Diamond, E. L., Gao, Y. T., Ji, B. T. & Fraumeni, J. F., Jr (1992) Risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer in Shanghai, with emphasis on diet. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1:441-448.[Abstract]

14. Zheng, T., Boyle, P., Willett, W. C., Hu, H., Dan, J., Evstifeeva, T. V., Niu, S. & MacMahon, B. (1993) A Case-control study of oral cancer in Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Associations with nutrient intakes, foods and food groups. Oral Oncol. Eur. J. Cancer 29B:45-55.

15. Winn, D. M. (1995) Diet and nutrition in the etiology of oral cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61:437S-445S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Levi, F., Pasche, C., La Vecchia, C., Lucchini, F., Franceschi, S. & Monnier, P. (1998) Food groups and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 77:705-709.[Medline]

17. Fioretti, F., Bosetti, C., Tavani, A., Franceschi, S. & La Vecchia, C. (1999) Risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer in never smokers. Oral Oncol 35:375-378.[Medline]

18. Franceschi, S., Favero, A., Conti, E., Talamini, R., Volpe, R., Negri, E., Barzan, L. & La Vecchia, C. (1999) Food groups, oils and butter, and cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx. Br. J. Cancer 80:614-620.[Medline]

19. Mason, J. B. & Levesque, T. (1996) Folate: effects on carcinogenesis and the potential for cancer chemoprevention. Oncology 10:1727-1744.[Medline]

20. Eto, I. & Krumdieck, C. L. (1986) Role of vitamin B12 and folate deficiencies in carcinogenesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 206:313-330.[Medline]

21. Subar, A. F., Block, G. & James, L. D. (1989) Folate intake and food sources in the US population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50:508-516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Bailey, L. B. & Gregory, J. F. (1999) Folate metabolism and requirements. J. Nutr. 129:779-782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Hillman, R. S. & Steinberg, S. E. (1982) The effects of alcohol on folate metabolism. Annu. Rev. Med. 33:345-354.[Medline]

24. Krumdieck, C. (1990) Folic acid. Brown, M. L. eds. Present Knowledge in Nutrition 1990:179-188 International Life Sciences Institute, Nutrition Foundation Washington, DC. .

25. Piyathilake, C. J., Macaluso, M., Hine, R. J., Richards, E. W. & Krumdieck, C. L. (1994) Local and systemic effects of cigarette smoking on folate and vitamin B-12. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 60:559-566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Piyathilake, C. J., Hine, R. J., Dasanayake, A. P., Richards, E. W., Freeberg, L. E., Vaughn, W. H. & Krumdieck, C. L. (1992) Effect of smoking on folate levels in buccal mucosal cells. Int. J. Cancer 52:566-569.[Medline]

27. Selhub, J. & Rosenberg, I. H. (1996) Folic acid. Ziegler, E. E. Filer, L. J., Jr eds. Present Knowledge in Nutrition Seventh Edition. 1996:206-219 ILSI Press Washington, DC. .

28. Frosst, P., Blom, H. J., Milos, R., Goyette, P., Sheppard, C. A., Matthews, R. G., Boers, G. J. H., den Heijer, M., Kluijtmans, L. A. J., van den Heuvel, L. P. & Rozen, R. (1995) A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat. Genet. 10:111-113.[Medline]

29. Chen, J., Giovannucci, E., Kelsey, K., Rimm, E. B., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Spiegelman, D., Willett, W. C. & Hunter, D. J. (1996) A methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 56:4862-4864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Ma, J., Stampfer, M. J., Giovannucci, E., Artigas, C., Hunter, D. J., Fuchs, C., Willett, W. C., Selhub, J., Hennekens, C. H. & Rozen, R. (1997) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, dietary interactions, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 57:1098-1102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Slattery, M. L., Potter, J. D., Samowitz, W., Schaffer, D. & Leppert, M. (1999) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, diet, and risk of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8:513-518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Skibola, C. F., Smith, M. T., Kane, E., Roman, E., Rollinson, S., Cartwright, R. A. & Morgan, G. (1999) Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:12810-12815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Esteller, M., Garcia, A., Martinez-Palones, J. M., Xercavins, J. & Reventos, J. (1997) Germ line polymorphisms in cytochrome-P450 1A1 (C4887 CYP1A1) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genes and endometrial cancer susceptibility. Carcinogenesis 18:2307-2311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Song, C., Xing, D., Tan, W., Wei, Q. & Lin, D. (2001) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms increase risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. Cancer Res. 61:3272-3275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. World Health Organization (1975) International Classification of Diseases 9th rev. 1975 WHO Geneva, Switzerland. .

36. Harty, L. C., Caporaso, N. E., Hayes, R. B., Winn, D. M., Bravo-Otero, E., Blot, W. J., Kleinman, D. V., Brown, L. M., Armenian, H. K., Fraumeni, J. F., Jr & Shields, P. G. (1997) Alcohol dehydrogenase 3 genotype and risk of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89:1698-1705.[Abstract]

37. USDA (1999) Composition of Foods, Agricultural Handbook No 8, USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 13 1999 USDA Washington, DC. .

38. Araki, A. & Sako, Y. (1987) Determination of free and total homocysteine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. 422:43-52.[Medline]

39. Westgard, J. O., Barry, P. L., Hunt, M. R. & Groth, T. (1981) A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. Clin. Chem. 27:493-501.[Free Full Text]

40. SAS Institute, Inc. (1996) The SAS System for Windows, Release 6.12, TS Level 0020 1996 SAS Institute Cary, NC. .

41. Schneider, J. A., Rees, D. C., Liu, Y. T. & Clegg, J. B. (1998) Worldwide distribution of a common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62:1258-1260.[Medline]

42. Breslow, N. E. & Day, N. E. (1980) Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. I. The Analysis of Case-Control Studies 1980 IARC Lyon, France .

43. Marshall, J. R. & Boyle, P. (1996) Nutrition and oral cancer. Cancer Causes Control :101-111.

44. Ramaswamy, G., Rao, V. R., Kumaraswamy, S. V. & Anantha, N. (1996) Serum vitamins’ status in oral leucoplakias—a preliminary study. Eur. J. Cancer B Oral Oncol. 32B:120-122.

45. Negri, E., Franceschi, S., Bosetti, C., Levi, F., Conti, E., Parpinel, M. & La Vecchia, C. (2000) Selected micronutrients and oral and pharyngeal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 86:122-127.[Medline]

46. De Stefani, E., Ronco, A., Mendilaharsu, M. & Deneo-Pellegrini, H. (1999) Diet and risk of cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract—II. Nutr. Oral Oncol. 35:22-26.

47. Selhub, J. & Miller, J. W. (1992) The pathogenesis of homocysteinemia: interruption of the coordinate regulation by S-adenosylmethionine of the remethylation and transsulfuration of homocysteine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 55:131-138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Selhub, J. (1999) Homocysteine metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19:217-246.[Medline]

49. Kato, I., Dnistrian, A. M., Schwartz, M., Toniolo, P., Koenig, K., Shore, R. E., Akhmedkhanov, A., Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A. & Riboli, E. (1999) Serum folate, homocysteine and colorectal cancer risk in women: a nested case-control study. Br. J. Cancer 79:1917-1921.[Medline]

50. Ma, J., Stampfer, M. J., Christensen, B., Giovannucci, E., Hunter, D., Chen, J., Willett, W. C., Selhub, J., Hennekens, C. H., Gravel, R. & Rozen, R. (1999) A polymorphism of the methionine synthase gene: Association with plasma folate, vitamin B12, homocyst(e)ine, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8:825-829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Weinstein, S. J., Ziegler, R. G., Selhub, J., Fears, T. R., Strickler, H. D., Brinton, L. A., Hamman, R. F., Levine, R. S., Mallin, K. & Stolley, P. D. (2001) Elevated serum homocysteine levels and increased risk of invasive cervical cancer in US Women. Cancer Causes Control 12:317-324.[Medline]

52. Alberg, A. J., Selhub, J., Shah, K. V., Viscidi, R. P., Comstock, G. W. & Helzlsouer, K. J. (2000) The risk of cervical cancer in relation to serum concentrations of folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 9:761-764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Thomson, S. W., Heimburger, D. C., Cornwell, P. E., Turner, M. E., Sauberlich, H. E., Fox, L. M. & Butterworth, C. E. (2000) Effect of total plasma homocysteine on cervical dysplasia risk. Nutr. Cancer 37:128-133.[Medline]

54. Goodman, M. T., McDuffie, K., Hernandez, B., Wilkens, L. R. & Selhub, J. (2000) Case-control study of plasma folate, homocysteine, vitamin B12, and cysteine as markers of cervical dysplasia. Cancer 89:376-382.[Medline]

55. Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. Z., Albanes, D., Nieto, F. J., Hartman, T. J., Tangrea, J. A., Rautalahti, M., Selhub, J., Virtamo, J. & Taylor, P. R. (1999) Pancreatic cancer risk and nutrition-related methyl-group availability indicators in male smokers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91:535-541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Levine, A. J., Siegmund, K. D., Ervin, C. M., Diep, A., Lee, E. R., Frankl, H. D. & Haile, R. W. (2000) The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C -> T polymorphism and distal colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 9:657-663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Ulrich, C. M., Kampman, E., Bigler, J., Schwartz, S. M., Chen, C., Bostick, R., Fosdick, L., Beresford, S. A., Yasui, Y. & Potter, J. D. (2000) Lack of association between the C677T MTHFR polymorphism and colorectal hyperplastic polyps. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 9:427-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Ulrich, C. M., Kampman, E., Bigler, J., Schwartz, S. M., Chen, C., Bostick, R., Fosdick, L., Beresford, S. A., Yasui, Y. & Potter, J. D. (1999) Colorectal adenomas and the C677T MTHFR polymorphism: Evidence for gene-environment interaction?. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev 8:659-668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Chen, J., Giovannucci, E., Hankinson, S. E., Ma, J., Willett, W. C., Spiegelman, D., Kelsey, K. T. & Hunter, D. J. (1998) A prospective study of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and methionine synthase gene polymorphisms, and risk of colorectal adenoma. Carcinogenesis 19:2129-2132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Ulvik, A., Evensen, E. T., Lien, E. A., Hoff, G., Vollset, S. E., Majak, B. M. & Ueland, P. M. (2001) Smoking, folate and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase status as interactive determinants of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps of colorectum. Am. J. Med. Genet. 101:246-254.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. Nacci, I. Dallan, L. Bruschini, A. C. Traino, E. Panicucci, P. Bruschini, V. Mancini, F. Rognini, and B. Fattori
Plasma Homocysteine, Folate, and Vitamin B12 Levels in Patients With Laryngeal Cancer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, December 1, 2008; 134(12): 1328 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. E Gabriel, J. W Crott, H. Ghandour, G. E Dallal, S.-W. Choi, M. K Keyes, H. Jang, Z. Liu, M. Nadeau, A. Johnston, et al.
Chronic cigarette smoking is associated with diminished folate status, altered folate form distribution, and increased genetic damage in the buccal mucosa of healthy adults.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 835 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. J. Shrubsole, Y.-T. Gao, Q. Cai, X. O. Shu, Q. Dai, J. R. Hebert, F. Jin, and W. Zheng
MTHFR Polymorphisms, Dietary Folate Intake, and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 190 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Pelucchi, R. Talamini, E. Negri, F. Levi, E. Conti, S. Franceschi, and C. La Vecchia
Folate intake and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2003; 14(11): 1677 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition