Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branham, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branham, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. M.
© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:658-664, 2002


Biochemical and Molecular Action of Nutrients

Phytoestrogens and Mycoestrogens Bind to the Rat Uterine Estrogen Receptor1

William S. Branham2, Stacey L. Dial, Carrie L. Moland, Bruce S. Hass, Robert M. Blair, Hong Fang*, Leming Shi*, Weida Tong*, Roger G. Perkins* and Daniel M. Sheehan

Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology and * R.O.W. Sciences Incorporated, Jefferson Laboratories, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079

2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wbranham{at}nctr.fda.gov.

Back


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Consumption of phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens in food products or as dietary supplements is of interest because of both the potential beneficial and adverse effects of these compounds in estrogen-responsive target tissues. Although the hazards of exposure to potent estrogens such as diethylstilbestrol in developing male and female reproductive tracts are well characterized, less is known about the effects of weaker estrogens including phytoestrogens. With some exceptions, ligand binding to the estrogen receptor (ER) predicts uterotrophic activity. Using a well-established and rigorously validated ER-ligand binding assay, we assessed the relative binding affinity (RBA) for 46 chemicals from several chemical structure classes of potential phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens. Although none of the test compounds bound to ER with the affinity of the standard, 17ß-estradiol (E2), ER binding was found among all classes of chemical structures (flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, coumarins, chalcones and mycoestrogens). Estrogen receptor relative binding affinities were distributed across a wide range (from ~43 to 0.00008; E2 = 100). These data can be utilized before animal testing to rank order estimates of the potential for in vivo estrogenic activity of a wide range of untested plant chemicals (as well as other chemicals) based on ER binding.


KEY WORDS: • uterus • estrogen receptor • phytoestrogen • mycoestrogen • structure-activity relationship • rats


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Phytoestrogens contained in the diet and in food supplements have the potential for both risks and benefits with respect to human health. Estrogenic chemicals consumed as constituents of plants (phytoestrogens) or fungi (mycoestrogens) exert a variety of adverse effects in animals including reduction in fertility in sheep grazing on phytoestrogen-containing clover (1Citation –3Citation ), alteration of uterine (4Citation –6Citation ) and behavioral (7Citation ,8Citation ) development in rodents, and increases in the volume of the sexually dimorphic nucleus in female rats (9Citation ). More recently, neonatal exposure to genistein has been shown to induce both uterine and vaginal abnormalities similar to those caused by the potent estrogen, ethinyl estradiol (10Citation ). Indeed, some researchers suggest that studies involving laboratory animals ideally should use phytoestrogen-free diets to ensure that no inadvertent estrogen exposure occurs (11Citation ,12Citation ). Despite these adverse effects observed in animals, dietary phytoestrogens might be beneficial in humans (13Citation –16Citation ).

Although the hazards of human exposure to potent synthetic estrogens (17Citation ,18Citation ) or antiestrogens with estrogen agonist activity (19Citation –21Citation ) are well documented, the potentially hazardous or beneficial effects of estrogens of plant origin are less well studied. Sonnenschein and Soto (22Citation ) indicate that exogenous estrogens of environmental origin can alter an organism or population by disrupting normally functioning endocrine or reproductive systems by inappropriately mimicking endogenous hormone actions, inhibiting hormone action, modulating hormone production or altering hormone receptor populations.

Under normal conditions, the estrogen receptor (ER)3 is either unliganded or bound by its major endogenous ligand, 17ß-estradiol (E2). This ligand-ER binding results in conformational changes and activation of the ER that allows binding of the ER-ligand complex to nuclear estrogen response elements. This sequence ultimately leads to gene transcription and translation (23Citation –25Citation ). The ER-ligand competitive binding assay quantitatively assesses a chemical’s ability to bind to the ER. Work in our laboratory (26Citation ) and others (27Citation ) seeks to construct in vitro test systems to assess large numbers of environmental estrogens. The data from these in vitro assays can be used to rank order chemicals that may act via the ER system in vivo in a manner similar to that of the endogenous estrogen (28Citation ).

The purpose of this study was to assess the ER binding of several groups of compounds of plant (flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, coumarins, chalcones) or fungal origin (zearalanone derivatives). These data and others (26Citation ) are being utilized to develop a battery of computational models to predict ER binding of additional plant- and fungus-derived chemicals as well as synthetic environmental chemicals. Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) and other Structure Activity Relationship (SAR) models have shown the utility of this assay approach to provide quantitative information for priority setting for conducting further evaluations of estrogenicity (29Citation ,30Citation ).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Animals.

Adult Sprague-Dawley–derived rats, bred and maintained as an out-bred colony at the National Center for Toxicological Research, were ovariectomized under light ether anesthesia. After an interval of at least 10 d, uteri were removed from groups of 10–12 rats immediately after they were killed by CO2 asphyxiation. To produce a pool of uterine cytosol, the uteri were weighed and homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer at 4°C in TRIS-EDTA-dithiothreitol-glycerol buffer (0.01 L/g tissue) consisting of 10 mmol/L TRIS; 1.5 mmol/L EDTA; glycerol (0.1 L/L buffer); and dithiothreitol (0.154 g/L), pH 7.4. The homogenates were transferred to chilled ultracentrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 105,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The supernatants were decanted and frozen at -70°C until used. All procedures involving animals were conducted with strict adherence to guidelines and procedures reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee both within the National Center for Toxicological Research and by an independent review panel.

Assay validation.

All assay procedures outlined here were previously detailed (26Citation ). Uterine cytosol concentration (ER), [3H]-E2, and incubation time and temperature are key parameters for validation of the ER competitive binding assay (27Citation ,31Citation ,32Citation ). Scatchard analyses were used to obtain Kd and Bmax for cytosol concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 g uterine tissue/L of buffer. Bmax was linear with cytosol concentrations in the range of 2–50 g/L (data not shown). At a cytosol concentration of 17 g/L (Bmax = 0.22 nmol/L), a stable Kd of ~0.1 nmol/L was observed. This Kd is consistent with current literature values (33Citation ). In addition, at a fixed concentration of 1 nmol/L [3H]-E2, binding increased linearly with increasing receptor concentration. Therefore, the final assay incubation conditions were chosen to be 20 h, 4°C using 17 g/L uterine tissue with 1 nmol/L [3H]-E2.

Assay procedures.

The commercial sources, CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) designations and chemical purities of the chemicals used are shown in Table 1Citation . All test compounds were dissolved in 100% ethanol at the highest concentrations achievable, typically 10-2 to 10-3 mol/L. Serial dilutions of the stock solutions in 100% ethanol were made to provide a range of assay concentrations. Each competition assay consisted of 27 tubes; tubes 1 and 26 ("zero competitor" tubes) had no competing E2. Tubes 2 and 27 had a final concentration of 1 x 10-7 mol/L E2, a two orders of magnitude excess of E2 to saturate the ER with nonradiolabeled competitor. The placement of an assay control tube at both the beginning and end of the assay controls for any "tube rack position" effects. The zero competitor tubes containing [3H]-E2 only were assayed to determine total binding, whereas the tubes containing 1 x 10-7 mol/L E2 were assayed to correct for nonspecific binding. Also, in each assay, a complete competition curve for E2 (tubes 2–7 containing a final E2 concentration of 1 x 10-7 mol/L to 3.3 x 10-11 mol/L) was included as an internal assay standard. The test compounds were also dissolved in 100% ethanol, serially diluted in ethanol and assayed at six concentrations for each chemical in assay tubes 8–25. Standards or test compounds (1 x 10-5 L) were combined with 1 x 10-5 L of [3H]-E2 (final concentration of 1 x 10-9 mol/L), 2.3 x 10-4 L of TRIS buffer (50 mmol/L, pH 7.4) and 5 x 10-5 L of stock cytosolic ER in prechilled 12 x 75 borosilicate glass assay tubes. Each assay tube was run in duplicate and each assay was repeated at least once.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Chemical information and comparisons of rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER) binding data

 
After incubation at 4°C for 20 h, 7.5 x 10-4 L of a hydroxyapatite (HAP) slurry (60% HAP in 50 mmol/L TRIS, pH 7.4) was added to the reaction mixture tubes. The tubes were vortexed briefly at 5-min intervals for 20 min and centrifuged for 4 min at 600 x g. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of cold 50 mmol/L TRIS buffer, and vortexed as above. This wash was repeated two times. After the third wash, the pellet was resuspended in 0.002 L of cold 100% ethanol and vortexed every 5 min for 15 min. After centrifugation at 600 x g, the ethanolic supernatant was decanted directly into scintillation counting vials for determination of [3H]-E2 remaining in the assay tube.

The percentage of binding of the test compounds to the ER was calculated by first subtracting the nonspecific binding (mean dpm in tubes 2 and 27) from the dpm of all of the other tubes. This provides the specifically bound dpm. This number is then expressed as the percentage of [3H]-E2 bound, i.e., specifically bound dpm of the sample/specifically bound dpm of the [3H]-E2 only tubes x 100. The data for each compound are expressed as an IC50, i.e., the molar concentration of the test compound that produces a 50% inhibition of [3H]-E2 binding to the ER. The relative binding activity (RBA) is defined as the ratio of the E2 IC50 to the test compound IC50 multiplied by 100.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Binding curves for the 29 compounds that competed with E2 for ER binding are shown in Figures 1Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation -6Citation ; data for the 12 compounds that did not bind to ER or which bound only slightly to ER (5 compounds) are not shown. In many cases, competing ligands were dissolved to the limits of solubility in an attempt to achieve complete binding curves. Nonbinders are defined as chemicals for which an IC50 was not obtained at the highest assay concentration achievable. Several of the phytoestrogens exhibited slight binding at the highest concentrations, but an IC50 concentration was not reached. Most of the curves appeared to be parallel to the E2 standard curve throughout the log-linear portion of the curves. Slight deviations from parallelism were observed with the 3'- and 4'-hydroxyflavanones (Fig. 2Citation ) and the 4- and 4'-hydroxychalcones (Fig. 5Citation ) particularly at concentrations giving >50% competition. These deviations from parallelism did not substantially affect their IC50 values. In all assay replicates, the IC50 values for individual chemicals did not vary by >0.5 log units of concentration. Also, the flavones 6,4'-dihydroxyflavone, 3,6,4'-trihydroxyflavone and apigenin (Fig. 1Citation ), and the chalcones 4- and 4'-hydroxychalcone (Fig. 5Citation ) exhibited an increase in the percentage of [3H]-E2 bound at concentrations that were <=15% of maximum E2 binding. This effect did not alter the IC50 values.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Competition curves for flavone binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the flavones. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Competition curves for flavanone binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the flavanones. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Competition curves for isoflavone binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the isoflavones. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Competition curves for coumarin binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the coumarins. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Competition curves for chalcone binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the chalcones. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Competition curves for mycoestrogen binding to rat uterine cytosolic estrogen receptor (ER). In this assay, [3H]-17ß-estradiol (E2) is competing for binding to the ER with increasing concentrations of either nonradiolabeled E2 (assay standard) or the mycoestrogens. Each datum represents the mean of at least 2 independent binding assays. The competitor concentration at 50% reduction in [3H]-E2 binding (IC50) is found at the intersection of the binding curves with the 50% binding line ({vdots} {vdots}).

 
The basic structures and ring designations for the flavanoids, chalcones, coumarins and mycoestrogens are shown in Figure 7Citation . Chemical information (CAS number, source, purity) and experimental data derived from the competition curves (IC50, RBA and log RBA) are shown in Table 1Citation . Of the 46 chemicals tested, 34 exhibited competition for the ER; 3 were strong binders (log RBA >0), 14 were moderate binders (log RBA between 0 and -2), and 17 were weak binders (log RBA <=-2). Some level of competition for ER binding of [3H]-E2 was seen in some members of all chemical classes; however, the highest affinity phytoestrogen (3,6,4'-trihydroxyflavone) competed with [3H]-E2 binding to the ER with ~0.05% lower affinity than E2. Some of the mycoestrogens competed with affinities approaching that of E2. Specific results are described below.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Generalized molecular structures for the six categories of chemicals examined. Ring labeling of carbon atoms allows identification and location of substituent groups.

 
All of the flavones that bound ER are hydroxylated at the 4' carbon with the exception of quercetin, a nonbinder. All other nonbinders lacked 4' hydroxyls. Flavones with hydroxyls at the 6,4' or 3,6,4' carbons exhibited the strongest ER binding. Although neither the parent flavone structure nor 7-hydroxyflavone bound to ER, hydroxylation of carbon-6 conferred weak binding. Placement of hydroxyls at the 5 and 7 positions (apigenin) or an additional hydroxyl at the 3 position (kaempferol) reduced ER binding by ~90% compared with 3,6,4'-trihydroxyflavone. Removal of hydroxyls from the C-ring reduced ER binding (baicalein) or eliminated ER binding (chrysin) as did increasing the number of hydroxyls (fisetin, myricetin, morin, quercetin). Only one methoxyflavone (6-hydroxy-2'-methoxyflavone), which failed to bind ER, was assessed.

Five of the ten flavanones bound to the ER. Single hydroxylation on either the A- or C-rings (6- and 7-hydroxyflavanone and 3'- and 4'-hydroxyflavanone) conferred weak ER binding. This suggests that the phenolic A-ring in steroids is crucial for binding because it can form three hydrogen bonds with ER amino acids and water. Naringenin (the strongest ER-binding flavanone) differs from the flavone apigenin only by the absence of the double bonds at the 2 and 3 carbons of the B-ring. This marginally reduced naringenin ER binding by ~75%.

Hydroxylation of the basic isoflavone structure at the 5,7,4' position (genistein) or at the 7,3',4' positions (7,3',4'-trihydroxyisoflavone) resulted in a binding affinity of about 0.45% or 0.00045% of E2, respectively. Conversion of genistein to daidzein by removal of the hydroxyl at the 5 position reduced the affinity for the ER by ~95%. Removal of the ketone oxygen at the 4 position and the double bond between C-2 and C-3 in the B-ring (equol) increased ER binding compared with daidzein. Replacement of the 7-hydroxyl of genistein by a methoxy group, thus converting genistein to prunetin, reduced binding to 0.4% of E2.

Chalcone, a nonhydroxylated chemical, exhibited weak binding to the ER, i.e., 0.0015% that of E2. Monohydroxylation of the chalcone structure at the 4- or 4'-carbons bound to ER with ~0.003% of the affinity of E2, a slight increase in ER binding. Chalcones with multiple hydroxyls such as 4,2' 4'-trihydroxychalcone and 4,2',4',6'-tetrahydroxychalcone (prunetin) competed with [3H]-E2 for ER with ~0.069% and 0.054% lower affinity than E2, respectively.

Only two coumarins [coumestrol and 4-ethyl-7-hydroxy-3-(p-methoxyphenyl)-dihydro-1-benzopyran-2-one] were assessed for ER binding. These each bound to ER with an affinity 0.9% that of E2.

In the group of mycoestrogens selected for assay, the "-anones" differ from the "-enones" by the absence of a double bond between carbons 11 and 12. Zearalanone bound ER with ~2% lower affinity than E2. Conversion of the C-7 ketone oxygen to a hydroxyl in the {alpha} stereochemical arrangement increased the ER binding to ~43% ({alpha}-zearalenol) and 30% ({alpha}-zearalanol) that of E2. Shifting these hydroxyls to the ß arrangement reduced ER binding to about 0.6% that of E2 (ß-zearalanol) and 0.2% that of E2 (ß-zearalenol).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We used a competitive binding assay for the rat uterine ER, in which receptor and ligand concentrations were optimized for chemical throughput (26Citation ). Each assay included a complete competition curve for E2 (positive control) and a negative control (ethanol). The in vitro ER binding assay measures a single bimolecular event, i.e., the reversible binding of a compound to the ER under equilibrium binding conditions established under tightly controlled chemical and physical parameters. This is demonstrated by the simple sigmoid curve on a semilog plot of the reference standard, E2. Two features of the binding curves for several of the phytoestrogens warrant comment. First, four compounds (3'-hydroxyflavanone, 4'-hydroxyflavanone, 4-hydroxychalcone and 4'-hydroxychalcone) yielded binding curves that exhibited an increase in slope in the linear portion of the curve below 50% binding compared with both the E2 standard and their chemical class counterparts. Whether or not this represents evidence of a multistep ER binding mechanism is not known. However, there was little or no effect on the IC50.

Second, several of the flavones (6,4'-dihydroxyflavone, 3,6,4'-trihydroxyflavone and apigenin) and chalcones (4-hydroxychalcone and 4'-hydroxychalcone) exhibited biphasic curves in which there was an increase in the percentage of [3H]-E2 bound at concentrations above 85% of maximal competition. This biphasic curve suggests that very high concentrations of some competitors caused more [3H]-E2 to bind to the ER. Borgna and Ladrech (34Citation ) showed that the dissociation rate of the ER-[3H]-E2 complexes increases at high concentrations of competitor. Although this would establish a different equilibrium for [3H]-E2, this should result in a lowering of apparent [3H]-E2 binding instead of an increase. It has been suggested (personal communication, Dr. V. J. Kramer, Rohm and Haas, Spring House, PA) that the higher apparent ER binding could be an artifact caused by precipitation of these chemicals at high concentrations, carrying [3H]-E2 into the HAP pellet. However, the HAP pellet was washed 4 times, which should dilute the high competitor concentrations. Also, because the ER is present in the assay as a high speed supernatant of a cytosolic extract, the high competitor concentrations may cause [3H]-E2 to bind to other cytosolic proteins, resulting in greater nonspecific binding. Clearly, this phenomenon is not understood.

Recent crystal structure analysis of four ligand-receptor complexes has indicated that the phenolic ring, normally the A-ring in steroids or phytoestrogens, is crucial for binding because it forms three hydrogen bonds with ER amino acids and water (35Citation –37Citation ). However, a recent crystal structure for ER-ß and genistein showed that the phenolic C-ring served to form the hydrogen bonds (37Citation ). This suggests that a chemical may bind in two orientations that differ by 180°. Our data showing that 3'-hydroxyflavanone and 4'-hydroxyflavanone have a phenolic C-ring important in binding suggests the possibility that "flipping" of these chemicals may occur in a manner similar to the situation for genistein binding to ER-ß.

Although there are no comprehensive analyses of phytoestrogen or mycoestrogen binding to rat ER, our data are consistent with values for several of the more commonly studied compounds. Verdeal et al. (38Citation ), using rat uterine cytosol incubated for 2 h at 20°C and dextran-coated charcoal to remove unbound components, found the following relative binding affinities: E2, 100; coumestrol, 4.9; genistein, 1.3; daidzein, 0.09; biochanin A, 0.07; and zearalenone, 4.0. Similarly, Wang et al. (39Citation ) reported an RBA of 0.9 for genistein and no ER binding for quercetin. Our data are generally within 20% of these values. Gutendorf and Westendorf (40Citation ) reported relative binding affinities for genistein (0.01) and coumestrol (0.12) that are lower than the results reported here and those cited above. Comparison of their ER binding data for "nonphytoestrogen" compounds with our previously published data (26Citation ) show their RBA to be consistently lower. Although these differences are small in some cases, we cannot explain them.

Mycoestrogens have been shown to be relatively potent inducers of uterine weight in rodents (41Citation ). Zearalanol, marketed as Ralgro (zeranol), has long been used as a growth promoter in cattle (42Citation ). The mycoestrogens examined here exhibited the greatest binding to ER of all chemical classes examined. The affinity of {alpha}-zearalanol to ER is ~30% lower than that for E2, which is in agreement with previous assays (43Citation ,44Citation ). Using the yeast cell estrogen screening assay, Coldham et al. (45Citation ) showed that {alpha}-zearalanol induces an estrogen-responsive reporter gene at a level that is only 1.3% of that induced by E2.

Measurement of estrogen binding to ER correlates with estrogenicity (46Citation ). For chemicals that do not show good correspondence for these two measures, differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination as well as ligand-specific differences in gene expression may provide an explanation. The estrogenicity of many of the more common phytoestrogens has been established by several measures. Using an in vitro rat endometrium–derived adenocarcinoma cell line, Hopert et al. (47Citation ) showed that coumestrol, genistein and daidzein induce production of the estrogen-regulated uterine protein, complement C3 (48Citation ,49Citation ). Similarly, genistein, biochanin A, daidzein, apigenin, kaempferol and coumestrol have been shown to increase DNA synthesis in MCF-7 cells (50Citation ,51Citation ). Our analyses indicate that these phytoestrogens are generally the more active ER binders. Although the estrogenic activity of phytoestrogens in humans is still under investigation, daily consumption of soy by postmenopausal women significantly increases the serum levels of several phytoestrogens (52Citation ). The serum levels of genistin, daidzin and equol increased by 756, 593 and 1008%, respectively.

Although other publications report ER RBA for structurally diverse data sets (27Citation ,53Citation –56Citation ), these data, combined with another data set from our laboratory (26Citation ), represent the most comprehensive published data set for naturally occurring chemicals competing with [3H]-E2 for ER assessed under conditions of a single, rigorously validated assay. In addition, these data are sufficiently complete, comprising both ER binders and ER nonbinders, to allow determination of the effects of substituent groups on binding. As such, these data are ideal for input into various computer-based models for QSAR and SAR modeling (29Citation ,30Citation ). We are currently assessing binding of these dietary estrogens to both rat alphafetoprotein (in amniotic fluid) and human sex hormone binding globulin (in plasma from pregnant women). Together, these data sets, in the appropriate computer-based models, will be useful to predict the risk of estrogen exposure.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by the FDA’s Office of Women’s Health, the Chemical Manufacturer’s Association and by the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Back

3 Abbreviations used: CAS, Chemical Abstracts Service; E2, 17ß-estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; HAP, hydroxylapatite; IC50, the molar concentration of test compound that inhibits E2 binding by 50%; RBA, relative binding activity; SAR, Structure-Activity Relationship; QSAR, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship. Back

Manuscript received 26 August 2001. Initial review completed 15 October 2001. Revision accepted 23 January 2002.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. Bennetts, H. W., Underwood, E. J. & Shier, F. L. (1946) A specific breeding problem of sheep on subterranean clover pastures in Western Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 22:2-12.

2. Shutt, D. A. & Braden, A.W.H. (1968) The significance of equol in relation to the oestrogenic responses in sheep ingesting clover with a high formononetin content. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 19:545-553.

3. Kaldas, R. S. & Hughes, C. L., Jr (1989) Reproductive and general metabolic effects of phytoestrogens in mammals. Reprod. Toxicol. 3:81-89.[Medline]

4. Medlock, K. L., Branham, W. S. & Sheehan, D. M. (1995) Effects of coumestrol and equol on the developing reproductive tract of the rat. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 208:67-71.[Medline]

5. Medlock, K. L., Branham, W. S. & Sheehan, D. M. (1995) The effects of phytoestrogens on neonatal rat uterine growth and development. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 208:307-313.[Medline]

6. Burroughs, C. D. (1995) Long-term reproductive tract alterations in female mice treated neonatally with coumestrol. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 208:78-81.[Medline]

7. Whitten, P. L., Lewis, C., Russell, E. & Naftolin, F. (1995) Phytoestrogen influences on the development of behavior and gonadotropin function. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 208:82-86.[Medline]

8. Whitten, P. L., Lewis, C. & Naftolin, F. (1993) A phytoestrogen diet induces the premature anovulatory syndrome in lactationally exposed female rats. Biol. Reprod. 49:1117-1121.[Abstract]

9. Faber, K. A. & Hughes, C. L., Jr (1991) The effect of neonatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol, genistein, and zearalenone on pituitary responsiveness and sexually dimorphic nucleus volume in the castrated adult rat. Biol. Reprod. 45:649-653.[Abstract]

10. Nagao, T., Yoshimura, S., Saito, Y., Nakagomi, M., Usumi, K. & Ono, N. (2001) Reproductive effects in male and female rats of neonatal exposure to genistein. Reprod. Toxicol. 15:399-411.[Medline]

11. Murphy, P. A., Farmakalidis, E. & Johnson, L. D. (1982) Isoflavone content of soya-based laboratory animal diets. Food Chem. Toxicol. 20:315-317.[Medline]

12. Boettger-Tong, H., Murthy, L., Chiappetta, C., Kirkland, J. L., Goodwin, B., Adlercreutz, H., Stancel, G. M. & Makela, S. (1998) A case of a laboratory animal feed with high estrogenic activity and its impact on in vivo responses to exogenously administered estrogens. Environ. Health Perspect. 106:369-373.[Medline]

13. Messina, M. J., Persky, V., Setchell, K.D.R. & Barnes, S. (1982) Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr. Cancer 21:113-131.

14. Setchell, K.D.R. (1998) Phytoestrogens: the biochemistry, physiology, and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 68(suppl.):1333S-1346S.[Abstract]

15. Tham, D. M., Gardner, C. D. & Haskell, W. L. (1998) Potential health benefits of dietary phytoestrogens: a review of the clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic evidence. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83:2223-2235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Strauss, L., Santti, R., Saarinen, N., Streng, T., Joshi, S. & Makela, S. (1998) Dietary phytoestrogens and their role in hormonally dependent disease. Toxicol. Lett. 102–103:349-354.

17. Kaufman, R. H., Adam, E. & Binder, G. L. (1980) Upper genital tract changes and pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am. J. Obstet. 137:299-308.[Medline]

18. Ben-Brauch, G., Menczer, J., Mashiach, S. & Serr, D. M. (1980) Uterine anomalies in diethylstilbestrol-exposed women with fertility disorders. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 60:395-397.

19. Killackey, M. A., Hakes, T. B. & Pierce, V. K. (1985) Endometrial carcinoma in breast cancer patients receiving antiestrogens. Cancer Treat. Rep. 69:237-238.[Medline]

20. Wolf, D. M. & Jordan, V. C. (1992) Gynecologic complications associated with long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 45:118-128.[Medline]

21. Kedar, R. P., Bourne, T. H., Powles, T. J., Collins, W. P., Ashley, S. E., Cosgrove, D. O. & Campbell, S. (1994) Effects of tamoxifen on uterus and ovaries of postmenopausal women in a randomised breast cancer prevention trial. Lancet 343:1318-1321.[Medline]

22. Sonnenschein, C. & Soto, A. M. (1998) An updated review of environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and antagonists. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 65:143-150.[Medline]

23. Beekman, J. M., Allan, G. F., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J. & O’Malley, B. W. (1993) Transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor requires a conformational change in the ligand binding domain. Mol. Endocrinol. 7:1266-1274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Parker, M. G., Arbuckle, N., Dauvois, S., Danielian, P. & White, R. (1993) Structure and function of the estrogen receptor. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 684:119-126.[Medline]

25. Tsai, M. J. & O’Malley, B. W. (1994) Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:451-486.[Medline]

26. Blair, R. M., Fang, H., Branham, W. S., Hass, B. S., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., Tong, W., Shi, L., Perkins, R. & Sheehan, D. L. (2000) The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. Toxicol. Sci. 54:138-153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Shelby, M. D., Newbold, R. R., Tully, D. B., Chae, K. & Davis, V. L. (1996) Assessing environmental chemicals for estrogenicity using a combination of in vitro and in vivo assays. Environ. Health Perspect. 104:1296-1300.[Medline]

28. EDSTAC (Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee) Report to Congress (2000) http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/oscpendo/index.htm#currentstatus..

29. Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L. M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W. S., Hass, B. S., Xie, W, Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L. & Sheehan, D. M. (2001) Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14:280-294.[Medline]

30. Shi, L. M., Fang, H., Tong, W., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Blair, R. M., Branham, W. S., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L. & Sheehan, D. M. (2001) QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:186-195.[Medline]

31. Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Johnson, H. J., Jr & Myers, H. N. (1973) Photoaffinity labels for estrogen binding proteins of rat uterus. Biochemistry 12:4085-4092.[Medline]

32. Korach, K., Sarver, P., Chae, K., McLachlan, J. & McKinney, J. (1988) Estrogen receptor-binding activity of polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls: conformationally restricted structural probes. Mol. Pharmacol. 33:120-126.[Abstract]

33. Anstead, G. M., Carlson, K. E. & Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (1997) The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site. Steroids 62:268-303.[Medline]

34. Borgna, J. L. & Ladrech, S. (1982) The dissociation rate of estrogen receptor-ligand complexes is increased by high concentrations of steroids and antiestrogens. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 27:1-15.[Medline]

35. Brzozowski, A. M., Pike, A. C., Dauter, Z., Hubbard, R. E., Bonn, T., Engstrom, O., Ohman, L., Greene, G. L., Gustafsson, J. A. & Carlquist, M. (1997) Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature (Lond.) 389:753-758.[Medline]

36. Shiau, A. K., Barstad, D., Loria, P. M., Cheng, L., Kushner, P. J., Agard, D. A. & Greene, G. L. (1998) The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 95:927-937.[Medline]

37. Pike, A. C., Brzozowski, A. M., Hubbard, R. E., Bonn, T., Thorsell, A. G., Engstrom, O., Ljunggren, J., Gustafsson, J. A. & Carlquist, M. (1999) Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor beta in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J. 18:4608-4618.[Medline]

38. Verdeal, K., Brown, R. R., Richardson, T. & Ryan, D. S. (1980) Affinity of phytoestrogens for estradiol-binding proteins and effect of coumestol on growth of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced rat mammary tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64:285-290.

39. Wang, T.T.Y., Sathyamoorthy, N. & Phang, J. M. (1996) Molecular effects of genistein on estrogen receptor mediated pathways. Carcinogenesis 17:271-275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Gutendorf, B. & Westendorf, J. (2001) Comparison of an array of in vitro assays for the assessment of the estrogenic potential of natural and synthetic estrogens, phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens. Toxicology 166:79-89.[Medline]

41. Sheehan, D. M., Branham, W. S., Medlock, K. L. & Shanmugasundaram, E.R.B. (1984) Estrogenic activity of zearalenone and zearalanol in the neonatal rat uterus. Teratology 29:383-392.[Medline]

42. Umberger, E. J. (1975) Products marketed to promote growth in food producing animals: steroid and hormone products. Toxicology 3:3-21.[Medline]

43. Kiang, D. T., Kennedy, B. J., Pathre, S. V. & Mirocha, C. J. (1978) Binding characteristics of zearalenone analogs to estrogen receptors. Cancer Res. 38:3611-3615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Martin, P. M., Horwitz, K. B., Ryan, D. S. & McGuire, W. L. (1978) Phytoestrogen interaction with estrogen receptor in human breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 103:1860-1867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Coldham, N. G., Dave, M., Sivapathasundaram, S., McDonnell, D. P., Connor, C. & Sauer, M. J. (1997) Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. Environ. Health Perspect. 105:734-742.[Medline]

46. Fang, H., Tong, W., Perkins, R., Soto, A., Prechtl, N. & Sheehan, D. M. (2000) Quantitative comparison of in vitro assays for estrogenic activity. Environ. Health Perspect. 108:723-729.[Medline]

47. Hopert, A.-C., Beyer, A., Frank, K., Strunck, E., Wunsche, W. & Vollmer, G. (1998) Characterization of estrogenicity of phytoestrogens in an endometrial-derived experimental model. Environ. Health Perspect. 106:581-586.[Medline]

48. Sundstrom, S. A., Komm, B. S., Ponce de Leon, H., Yi, Z., Teuscher, C. & Lyttle, R. (1989) Estrogen regulation of tissue-specific expression of complement C3. J. Biol. Chem. 264:16,941-16,947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Kuivanen, P. C., Capulong, R. B., Harkins, R. N. & Desombre, E. R. (1989) The estrogen-responsive 110K and 74K uterine secretory proteins are structurally related to complement C3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 158:898-905.[Medline]

50. Wang, C. & Kurzer, M. S. (1997) Phytoestrogen concentration determines effects on DNA synthesis in human breast cancer cells. Nutr. Cancer 28:236-247.[Medline]

51. Zava, D. T. & Duwe, G. (1997) Estrogenic and antiproliferative properties of genistein and other flavanoids in human breast cancer cells in vitro. Nutr. Cancer 27:31-40.[Medline]

52. Albertazzi, P., Pansisn, F., Bottazzi, M., Bonaccorsi, G., De Aloysio, D. & Morton, M. S. (1999) Dietary soy supplementation and phytoestrogen levels. Obstet. Gynecol 94:229-231.[Medline]

53. Kuiper, G.G.J.M., Carlsson, B., Grandien, K., Enmark, E., Haggblad, J., Nilsson, S. & Gustafsson, J.-A. (1997) Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Endocrinology 138:863-870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Kuiper, G.G.J.M., Lemmen, J. G., Carlsson, B., Corton, J. C., Safe, S. H., van der Saag, P. T., van der Burg, B. & Gustafsson, J.-A. (1998) Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor ß. Endocrinology 139:4252-4263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Bolger, R., Wiese, T. E., Ervin, K., Nestich, S. & Checovich, W. (1998) Rapid screening of environmental chemicals for estrogen receptor binding capacity. Environ. Health Perspect. 106:551-557.[Medline]

56. Waller, C. L., Oprea, T. I., Chae, K., Park, H.-K., Korach, K. S., Laws, S. C., Wiese, T. E., Kelce, W. R. & Gray, L. E., Jr (1996) Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9:1240-1248.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Raju, A. Bielecki, D. Caldwell, E. Lok, M. Taylor, K. Kapal, I. Curran, G. M. Cooke, R. P. Bird, and R. Mehta
Soy Isoflavones Modulate Azoxymethane-Induced Rat Colon Carcinogenesis Exposed Pre- and Postnatally and Inhibit Growth of DLD-1 Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells by Increasing the Expression of Estrogen Receptor-{beta}
J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Kurahashi, M. Iwasaki, M. Inoue, S. Sasazuki, and S. Tsugane
Plasma Isoflavones and Subsequent Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Nested Case-Control Study: The Japan Public Health Center
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2008; 26(36): 5923 - 5929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. E. Chavarro, T. L. Toth, S. M. Sadio, and R. Hauser
Soy food and isoflavone intake in relation to semen quality parameters among men from an infertility clinic
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2584 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
Y. Kohno, S. Kitamura, S. Sanoh, K. Sugihara, N. Fujimoto, and S. Ohta
METABOLISM OF THE {alpha},{beta}-UNSATURATED KETONES, CHALCONE AND TRANS-4-PHENYL-3-BUTEN-2-ONE, BY RAT LIVER MICROSOMES AND ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY OF THE METABOLITES
Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2005; 33(8): 1115 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Wang, S. Tranguch, H. Xie, G. Hanley, S. K. Das, and S. K. Dey
Variation in commercial rodent diets induces disparate molecular and physiological changes in the mouse uterus
PNAS, July 12, 2005; 102(28): 9960 - 9965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
I. Woclawek-Potocka, T. J. Acosta, A. Korzekwa, M. M. Bah, M. Shibaya, K. Okuda, and D. J. Skarzynski
Phytoestrogens Modulate Prostaglandin Production in Bovine Endometrium: Cell Type Specificity and Intracellular Mechanisms
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2005; 230(5): 326 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. S. MacDonald, J. Guo, J. Copeland, J. D. Browning Jr, D. Sleper, G. E. Rottinghaus, and M. A. Berhow
Environmental Influences on Isoflavones and Saponins in Soybeans and Their Role in Colon Cancer
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1239 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
I. Woclawek-Potocka, M. M. Bah, A. Korzekwa, M. K. Piskula, W. Wiczkowski, A. Depta, and D. J. Skarzynski
Soybean-Derived Phytoestrogens Regulate Prostaglandin Secretion in Endometrium During Cattle Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2005; 230(3): 189 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J.-Y. Guo, X. Li, J. D. Browning Jr., G. E. Rottinghaus, D. B. Lubahn, A. Constantinou, M. Bennink, and R. S. MacDonald
Dietary Soy Isoflavones and Estrone Protect Ovariectomized ER{alpha}KO and Wild-Type Mice from Carcinogen-Induced Colon Cancer
J. Nutr., January 1, 2004; 134(1): 179 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
Z. Jin and R. S. MacDonald
Soy Isoflavones Increase Latency of Spontaneous Mammary Tumors in Mice
J. Nutr., October 1, 2002; 132(10): 3186 - 3190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branham, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branham, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheehan, D. M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition