Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Povey, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margison, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Povey, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margison, G. P.

© 2002 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences J. Nutr. 132:3518S-3521S, November 2002


Supplement: International Research Conference on Food, Nutrition & Cancer

DNA Alkylation and Repair in the Large Bowel: Animal and Human Studies1 ,2

Andrew C. Povey3, Alaa F. Badawi*,4, Donald P. Cooper*,5, C. Nicholas Hall{dagger}, Kathryn L. Harrison, Peta E. Jackson*,6, Nicholas P. Lees{dagger}, Peter J. O’Connor*,7 and Geoffrey P. Margison*

Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, * Cancer Research UK Carcinogenesis Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, M20 9BX and {dagger} Department of General Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, England

3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: apovey{at}man.ac.uk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 
O6-Methylguanine (O6-MeG), a procarcinogenic DNA adduct that arises from exposure to methylating agents, has been detected in human colorectal DNA at levels comparable to those that cause adverse effects in model systems. O6-MeG levels vary within the colon, being higher in the cancer-prone regions of the large bowel. In rats and mice, O6-MeG persistence in colon DNA is associated with the induction of colon tumors after treatment with methylating agents. These tumors frequently contain K-ras GC->AT transition mutations, which is consistent with the mutagenic properties of O6-MeG: such mutations are also commonly found in human colorectal cancers. O6-Alkylguanine adducts are removed by the DNA repair protein, O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase (MGMT). MGMT overexpression in transgenic mice reduces the formation of K-ras GC->AT mutations and tumors induced by methylating agents. Interindividual variations in human colon MGMT activity are large and large bowel tumors can occur in regions of low activity. Low MGMT activity in normal mucosa has been associated with the occurrence of K-ras GC->AT mutations, whereas reduced MGMT expression and an increased frequency of K-ras GC->AT mutations in colorectal cancers have been linked to MGMT promoter methylation. MGMT activity is also lower in adenomas than in adjacent normal tissue but only in those adenomas with this specific mutation. These results are entirely consistent with the hypothesis that GC->AT mutations in the K-ras oncogene result from the formation and persistence of O6-alkylguanine lesions in colorectal DNA. Human exposure to endogenous or exogenous alkylating agents may thus be an environmental determinant of colorectal cancer risk.


KEY WORDS: • O6-methylguanine • O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase • MGMT • K-ras • colorectal cancer


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Despite the major advances in identifying colorectal cancer susceptibility genes (1Citation ,2Citation ), dietary and environmental factors that are major determinants of sporadic cancer risk remain largely unidentified (3Citation ). The identification of these etiological factors is important because this may lead to the development of new approaches to identify high-risk populations or to prevent this cancer.

The variety of molecular changes occurring in human colorectal tumors are not consistent with exposure to a single genotoxic agent but suggest that a number of different agents may increase colorectal cancer risk (4Citation ,5Citation ). Furthermore, as with most human tissues, colorectal DNA contains damage arising from exposure to a number of different genotoxic agents, including those known collectively as alkylating agents (6Citation –11Citation ). The aim of this report was to discuss the role of DNA alkylation damage and the repair of such damage in the etiology of human colorectal cancer.


    DNA alkylation damage and DNA repair in human colorectal tissue
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Human colorectal DNA has long been known to contain the damaged bases O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG)8 and N7-methylguanine, which arise from exposure to methylating agents (9Citation –11Citation ). The source of this exposure is unknown but can potentially occur through dietary, lifestyle and occupational exposures; from endogenous alkylating agents; and via in situ formation typically mediated by the bacterial or chemical nitrosation of amines (12Citation ,13Citation ). Although there are many potential methylating agents (14Citation ), DNA alkylation can also arise through exposure to other alkylating agents [e.g., ethylating or carboxymethylating agents (15Citation ,16Citation )] and potentially to agents that are as yet not chemically characterized. The relative importance of such exposures is currently unknown, but available evidence shows damage to DNA arising from methylating agents (9Citation –11Citation ). Interindividual variation in O6-MeG levels is large, being at least 100-fold (9Citation ,11Citation ), and we reported some evidence suggesting that the highest O6-MeG levels occur in the regions of the large bowel where most tumors occur—that is, the sigmoid colon and rectum (11Citation ).

O6-MeG is a known toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic DNA base modification; in the absence of DNA repair, O6-MeG has been shown to induce GC->AT transition mutations (17Citation ). In DNA repair–deficient cell lines exposed to methylating agents, it has been calculated that one mutation results from every 8 O6-MeG adducts produced in the coding region of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (18Citation ). Adduct levels observed in human colon cells correspond to 10s to 100s of adducts per cell (assuming that 1 µg of DNA contains 3124 pmol of nucleotides) but may, in certain cell populations, be much higher (19Citation ,20Citation ). Human DNA adduct levels may thus be sufficient to cause biological effects, particularly in cells that are DNA repair deficient.

Removal of O6-MeG by the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) is a stoichiometric process that results in the transfer of the methyl group from O6-MeG to a cysteine acceptor group (position 145) in the mammalian protein (18Citation ,21Citation ). This process inactivates the protein, which is subsequently degraded through ubiquitination pathways (22Citation ). Continued protection of the DNA thus requires continuous de novo synthesis of active protein; overexpression of MGMT in cells and animals protects against toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity induced by alkylating agents (23Citation ). If O6-MeG is not repaired before DNA replication, then O6-MeG-thymidine mispairs can be formed. These mispairs are recognized by the hMSH2-hMSH6 heterodimer of the mismatch repair system (24Citation ). This results in the generation of an intermediate structure that, on a further round of DNA replication, results in a DNA double-strand break, triggering recombination and p53-mediated apoptotic cell death (25Citation ). Mice lacking both MGMT and functional mismatch repair are thus more prone to develop cancer in response to alkylation damage than are MGMT-deficient but mismatch repair–proficient animals (26Citation ).

Interindividual variations in functional colon MGMT activity can be large. In different studies, variations between 2- and 18-fold were reported in normal tissue and variations between 2- and 33-fold were reported in tumor tissue (27Citation ). Although the complete absence of functional MGMT activity in human colorectal tissue was reported (28Citation ,29Citation ), this phenotype seems relatively rare, being present in <1% of normal tissue samples and 3% of tumor samples (27Citation ).

Intraindividual variation in MGMT activity has been poorly characterized. We recently studied MGMT activity in multiple biopsy samples from the large bowel of patients with colorectal cancer (30Citation ). In five patients, intraindividual variation was 1.1- to 2.5-fold, but in two patients, intraindividual variation was 12- and >24-fold: in the latter case there was no detectable activity in two normal mucosal biopsy samples. A consistent topographical pattern of MGMT activity in normal mucosa associated with colorectal cancers was found with tumors occurring in regions of low MGMT activity. There was a modest but significant fall in MGMT activity, unrelated to tumor subsite or stage, upstream of left-sided tumors with a mean gradient of 0.22 fmol/(µg DNA · cm) (95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.42; P = 0.02). Over a 10-cm length of tissue, this would correspond to a 10–80% drop in MGMT activity. The gradient in activity along the colon may reflect a number of different mechanisms, including longitudinal changes in gene expression (and hence be a susceptibility factor) or varying exposure to alkylating agents (and hence be an exposure marker).


    DNA alkylation damage and repair in dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 
To further examine the relevance of DNA alkylation damage and repair in the etiology of colorectal cancer, we used 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH), a methylating agent, to induce colon tumors in animal models. This system is widely used because of the pronounced organotropic properties of the carcinogen (31Citation ), a wide variation in tumor response in different rodent strains (32Citation –35Citation ), the diet-induced modulation in tumor incidence (36Citation ), a distribution of tumors similar to those within the human colon (37Citation ,38Citation ) and the similarity between animal and human pathology (39Citation ). Implicit in such work is the assumption that DNA alkylation may also be important in human colon cancer formation.

DMH produces predominantly distal colon tumors but at widely varying rates depending on the strain of the animal (32Citation –34Citation ,40Citation 42Citation ). After DMH administration, susceptible mouse strains can have higher amounts of DNA strand breaks and DNA adducts in colonic DNA than do nonsusceptible strains (43Citation ,44Citation ), but such observations are not consistently reported (45Citation ,46Citation ). DNA alkylation is also detected in tissues other than the colon (e.g., liver, kidney) and the specific induction of colon tumors has been ascribed to tissue-specific differences in the persistence of certain DNA adducts (45Citation ,47Citation –49Citation ). Other factors, such as whether damaged stem cells at positions 1 and 2 within the crypt that are selectively removed by apoptosis or undergo deleterious mutations, may also be important in DMH tumor induction (50Citation ). Intracolonic differences in baseline proliferative parameters (crypt length, labeling index and proliferative zone) have also been reported and are associated with the tumor formation (51Citation ,52Citation ).

Treating female SWR mice with DMH (6.8 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection) once weekly for up to 20 wk generated the site-specific induction of colon tumors with 0%, 43% and 87% of animals having proximal, mid and distal colon tumors, respectively (53Citation ). Separate groups of mice were killed up to 1 wk after the final DMH injection, and the large bowel was removed and divided into thirds (proximal, mid and distal colon) (54Citation ). O6-MeG levels in colonic DNA, colonic MGMT activity and cell proliferative indexes in the colon were found to vary in a location-, dose- and time-dependent manner. O6-MeG levels were generally lowest in proximal colon DNA and highest in distal colon DNA and ranged from <0.1 to 16.6 fmol of O6-MeG/µg of DNA. Steady state O6-MeG levels were obtained at the highest cumulative dose (DMH at 136 mg/kg) with levels in the mid and distal colon DNA being 5 and 10 times those in proximal colon DNA. The cumulative sum of persistent O6-MeG was associated with tumor incidence in both the distal and mid colon: the distal colon was more susceptible in that similar levels of persistent O6-MeG adducts in the mid and distal colon were associated with higher tumor yield in the distal colon. Basal MGMT activity varied between 0.97 and 1.22 fmol/µg of DNA within the colon but was not associated with adduct levels, tumor induction or differences in tumor yield within the colon.


    Association between DNA repair and molecular changes in human colorectal tumors
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Colonic tumors induced by DMH treatment frequently but not always contain GC->AT transition mutations in the K-ras oncogene (53Citation ,55Citation ). This mutation is consistent with the known mutagenic properties of O6-MeG; because overexpression of MGMT in the colon reduces the formation of DMH-induced K-ras mutations (56Citation ), this suggests that the formation and persistence of O6-MeG are important etiological determinants of colon tumors in these models. Because GC->AT transition mutations also account for the majority of the K-ras mutations seen within human colorectal cancers (5Citation ), it is not unreasonable to suggest that the persistence of O6-MeG in human tissues plays an important role in cancer formation.

Although we found no association between the presence of O6-MeG in human colorectal tissues and the presence of K-ras GC->AT gene mutations (57Citation ), we did find that low MGMT activity in normal colon tissue was associated with K-ras GC->AT transition mutations in colorectal tumors (58Citation ). Further evidence of the importance of MGMT in influencing K-ras mutational activation has come from promoter methylation studies. Methylation of CpG islands within the promotor region of the MGMT gene has been associated with both reduced MGMT expression (59Citation ) and an increased frequency of GC->AT transition mutations in K-ras in colorectal cancers (60Citation ,61Citation ). More recently we reported that adenomas containing a K-ras GC->AT mutation had lower MGMT levels (relative to adjacent normal tissue) than adenomas without this mutation (62Citation ). Because MGMT removes O6-alkylguanine lesions from DNA, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that alkylating agents are involved in the etiology of at least a portion of colorectal cancers

Evidence from animal models and human studies increasingly implicates exposure to alkylating agents as a key event resulting in K-ras mutational activation of at least a subset of colorectal tumors. The role of alkylating agents in colorectal tumorigenesis is potentially larger than this because alkylating agent exposure has been linked to changes in other key targets such as mismatch repair genes (63Citation ). Furthermore the recombinogenic effects of O6-MeG may make an important contribution to genetic instability and other steps associated with the multiple events involved in malignant transformation. The precise nature and origin of the alkylating agents are still uncertain; thus it will be difficult to identify not only individuals and populations at increased risk (through exposure or susceptibility) but also ways of reducing this risk. Further research is required to better characterize these agents so as to identify exposure sources and appropriate ways to reduce this exposure.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented as part of a symposium, "International Research Conference on Food, Nutrition & Cancer," given by the American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund International in Washington, D.C., July 11–12, 2002. This conference was sponsored by BASF Aktiengesellschaft; California Dried Plum Board; The Campbell Soup Company; Danisco Cultor; Galileo Laboratories, Inc.; Mead Johnson Nutritionals; Roche Vitamins, Inc.; and Yamanouchi/Shaklee/INOBYS. Guest editors for this symposium were Helen Norman and Ritva Butrum, American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, D.C. 20009. Back

2 Supported by Cancer Research UK, the Christie Hospital Endowment Fund and the Association for International Cancer Research. Back

4 Present address: Division of Population Sciences, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111. Back

5 Present address: Micromass UK Limited, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LZ. Back

6 Present address: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205. Back

7 Present address: Retired. Back

8 Abbreviations used: DMH, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine; MGMT, O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase; O6-MeG, O6-methylguanine. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 DNA alkylation damage and...
 Association between DNA repair...
 LITERATURE CITED
 

1. de la Chapelle, A. & Peltomaki, P. (1995) Genetics of hereditary colon cancer. Annu. Rev. Genet 29:329-348.[Medline]

2. Fearnhead, N. S., Britton, M. P. & Bodmer, W. F. (2001) The ABC of APC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:721-723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Potter, J. D., Slattery, M. L., Bostick, R. M. & Gapstur, S. M. (1993) Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol. Rev. 15:499-545.[Free Full Text]

4. Cho, K. R. & Vogelstein, B. (1992) Genetic alterations in the adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Cancer 70:1727-1731.[Medline]

5. Bos, J. L. (1989) Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res 49:4682-4689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Alexandrov, K., Rojas, M., Kadlubar, F. F., Lang, N. P. & Bartsch, H. (1996) Evidence of anti-benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide-DNA adduct formation in human colon mucosa. Carcinogenesis 17:2081-2083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Totsuka, Y., Fukutome, K., Takahashi, M., Takahashi, S., Tada, A., Sugimura, T. & Wakabayashi, K. (1996) Presence of N2-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo [4,5-f] quinoxaline (dG-C8-MeIQx) in human tissues. Carcinogenesis 17:1029-1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A., Grosse, Y., Carriere, V., Cugnenc, P.-H., Berger, A., Carnot, F., Beaune, P. & de Waziers, I. (1995) High levels of DNA adducts in human colon are associated with colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 55:5611-5616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hall, C. N., Badawi, A. F., O’Connor, P. J. & Saffhill, R. (1991) The detection of alkylation damage in the DNA of human gastrointestinal tissues. Br. J. Cancer 64:59-63.[Medline]

10. Harrison, K. L., Wood, M., Lees, N. P., Hall, C. N., Margison, G. P. & Povey, A. C. (2001) Development and application of a sensitive and rapid immunoassay for the quantitation of N7-methyldeoxyguanosine in DNA samples. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14:295-301.[Medline]

11. Povey, A. C, Hall, C. N., Badawi, A. F., Cooper, D. P. & O’Connor, P. J. (2000) Elevated levels of the pro-carcinogenic adduct, O6-methylguanine, in normal DNA from the cancer prone regions of the large bowel. Gut 47:362-365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bartsch, H. & Montesano, R. (1984) Relevance of nitrosamines to human cancer. Carcinogenesis 5:1381-1393.[Free Full Text]

13. Hotchkiss, J. H. (1987) A review of current literature on N-nitroso compounds in foods. Adv. Food Res 31:53-115.[Medline]

14. Kyrtopoulos, S. A. (1998) DNA adducts in humans after exposure to methylating agents. Mutat. Res. 405:135-143.[Medline]

15. Wilson, V. L., Weston, A., Manchester, D. K., Trivers, G. E., Roberts, D. W., Kadlubar, F. F., Wild, C. P., Montesano, R., Willey, J. C., Mann, D. L. & Harris, C. C. (1989) Alkyl and aryl carcinogen adducts detected in human peripheral lung. Carcinogenesis 10:2149-2152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Shuker, D. E. G. & Margison, G. P. (1997) Nitrosated glycine derivatives as a potential source of O6-methylguanine in DNA. Cancer Res 57:366-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Margison, G. P. & Santibanez-Koref, M. F. (2002) O6-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: role in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy. Bioessays 24:255-266.[Medline]

18. Rasouli-Nia, A., Ullah, S., Mirzayans, R., Paterson, M. C. & Day, R. S., III (1994) On the quantitative relationship between O6-methylguanine residues in genomic DNA and production of sister chromatid exchanges, mutations and lethal events in a Mer- human tumor cell line. Mutat. Res. 314:99-113.[Medline]

19. Connor, P. J., Manning, F. C., Gordon, A. T., Billett, M. A., Cooper, D. P., Elder, R. H. & Margison, G. P. (2000) DNA repair: kinetics and thresholds. Toxicol. Pathol. 28:375-381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hong, M. Y., Chapkin, R. S., Wild, C. P., Morris, J. S., Wang, N., Carroll, R. J., Turner, N. D. & Lupton, J. R. (1999) Relationship between DNA adduct levels, repair enzyme and apoptosis as a function of DNA methylation by azoxymethane. Cell Growth Differ 10:749-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Pegg, A. E. (2000) Repair of O6-alkylguanine by alkyltransferases. Mutat. Res. 462:83-100.[Medline]

22. Srivenugopal, K. S., Yuan, X. H., Friedman, H. S. & Ali-Osman, F. (1996) Ubiquitination-dependent proteolysis of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human and murine tumor cells following inactivation with O6-benzylguanine or 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Biochemistry 35:1328-1334.[Medline]

23. Kaina, B., Fritz, G., Ochs, K., Haas, S., Grombacher, T., Dosch, J., Christmann, M., Lund, P., Gregel, C. M. & Becker, K. (1998) Transgenic systems in studies on genotoxicity of alkylating agents: critical lesions, thresholds and defense mechanisms. Mutat. Res. 405:179-191.[Medline]

24. Berardini, M., Mazurek, A. & Fishel, R. (2000) The effect of O6-methylguanine DNA adducts on the adenosine nucleotide switch functions of hMSH2-hMSH6 and hMSH2-hMSH3. J. Biol. Chem. 275:27851-27857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Boley, S. E., McManus, T. P., Maher, V. M. & McCormick, J. J. (2000) Malignant transformation of human fibroblast cell strain MSU-1.1 by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea: evidence of elimination of p53 by homologous recombination.. Cancer Res. 60:4105-–4111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Kawate, H., Itoh, R., Sakumi, K., Nakabeppu, Y., Tsuzuki, T., Ide, F., Ishikawa, T., Noda, T., Nawata, H. & Sekiguchi, M. (2000) A defect in a single allele of the Mlh1 gene causes dissociation of the killing and tumorigenic actions of an alkylating carcinogen in methyltransferase-deficient mice. Carcinogenesis 21:301-305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Povey, A. C., Hall, C. N., Cooper, D. P., O’Connor, P. J. & Margison, G. P. (2000) Determinants of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in normal and tumour tissue from human colon and rectum. Int. J. Cancer 85:68-72.[Medline]

28. White, A., Kibitel, J., Garcia, Y., Belanich, M., Yarosh, D., Wideroff, J., Levin, L., Held, D., Fuchs, A. & Citron, M. (1997) O6-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in normal colon tissue and colon cancer. Oncol. Res. 9:149-153.[Medline]

29. Gerson, S. L., Allay, E., Vitantonio, K. & Dumenco, L. L. (1995) Determinants of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in human colon cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 1:519-525.[Abstract]

30. Lees, N. P., Harrison, K. L., Hill, E., Hall, C. N., Margison, G. P. & Povey, A. C. (2002) Longitudinal variation in O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase activity in the human colon and rectum.. Br. J. Cancer (in press).

31. Weisburger, J. H. & Fiala, E. S. (1983) Experimental colon carcinogens and their mode of action. Autrup, H. Williams, G. M. eds. Experimental Colon Carcinogenesis 1983:27-50 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL,. .

32. Jacoby, R. F., Hohman, C., Marshall, D. J., Frick, T. J., Schlack, S., Broda, M., Smutko, J. & Elliott, R. W. (1994) Genetic analysis of colon cancer susceptibility in mice. Genomics 22:381-387.[Medline]

33. Moen, C. J. A., Groot, P. C., Hart, A. A. M., Snoek, M. & Demant, P. (1996) Fine mapping of colon tumor susceptibility (Scc) genes in the mouse, different from the genes known to be somatically mutated in colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:1082-1086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Van Wezel, T., Stassen, A. P. M., Moen, C. J. A., Hart, A. A. M., Van der Valk, M. A. & Demant, P. (1996) Gene interaction and single gene effects in colon tumour susceptibility in mice. Nat. Genet. 14:468-470.[Medline]

35. Van Wezel, T., Ruivenkamp, C. A., Stassen, A. P., Moen, C. J. & Demant, P. (1999) Four new colon cancer susceptibility loci, Scc6 to Scc9 in the mouse. Cancer Res 59:4216-4218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Kim, J. M., Araki, S., Kim, D. J., Park, C. B., Takasuka, N., Baba-Toriyama, H., Ota, T., Nir, Z., Khachik, F., Shimidzu, N., Tanaka, Y., Osawa, T., Uraji, T., Murakoshi, M., Nishino, H. & Tsuda, H. (1998) Chemopreventive effects of carotenoids and curcumins on mouse colon carcinogenesis after 1,2-dimethylhydrazine initiation. Carcinogenesis 19:81-85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Park, H. S., Goodlad, R. A. & Wright, N. A. (1997) The incidence of aberrant crypt foci and colonic carcinoma in dimethylhydrazine-treated rats varies in a site-specific manner and depends on tumor histology. Cancer Res 57:4507-4510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Carter, J. W., Lancaster, H. K., Hardman, W. E. & Cameron, I. L. (1994) Distribution of intestine-associated lymphoid tissue, aberrant crypt foci and tumors in the large bowel of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-treated mice. Cancer Res 54:4304-4307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Chang, W. W. L. (1984) Histogenesis of colon cancer in experimental animals. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 19:27-43.

40. Evans, J. T., Hauschka, T. S. & Mittelman, A. (1974) Differential susceptibility of four mouse strains to induction of multiple large-bowel neoplasms by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52:999-1000.

41. Turusov, V. S., Lanko, N. S., Krutovskikh, V. A. & Parfenov, Y. D. (1982) Strain differences in susceptibility of female mice to 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Carcinogenesis 3:603-608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Diwan, B. A., Meier, H. & Blackman, K. E. (1977) Genetic differences in the induction of colorectal tumors by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in inbred mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 59:455-458.

43. Bolognesi, C., Mariani, M. R. & Boffa, L. C. (1988) Target tissue DNA damage in inbred mouse strains with different susceptibility to the colon carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Carcinogenesis 9:1347-1350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Cooper, H. K., Buecheler, J. & Kleihues, P. (1978) DNA alkylation in mice with genetically different susceptibility to 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 38:3063-3065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. James, J. T. & Autrup, H. (1983) Methylated DNA adducts in the large intestine of ICR/Ha and C57BL/Ha mice given 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 70:541-546.

46. Papanikolaou, A., Shank, R. C., Delker, D. A., Povey, A., Cooper, D. P. & Rosenberg, D. W. (1998) Initial levels of azoxymethane-induced DNA methyl adducts are not predictive of tumor susceptibility in inbred mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 150:196-203.[Medline]

47. Herron, D. C. & Shank, R. C. (1981) In vivo kinetics of O6-methylguanine and 7-methylguanine formation and persistence in DNA of rats treated with symmetrical dimethylhydrazine. Cancer Res 41:3967-3972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Herron, D. C. & Shank, R. C. (1982) DNA methylation during chronic administration of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in a carcinogenic regimen. Carcinogenesis 3:857-860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Swenberg, J. A., Cooper, H. K., Bucheler, J. & Kleihues, P. (1979) 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine-induced methylation of DNA bases in various rat organs and the effect of pretreatment with disulfiram. Cancer Res 39:465-467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Potten, C. S., Li, Y. Q., O’Connor, P. J. & Winton, D. J. (1992) A possible explanation for the differential cancer incidence in the intestine, based on distribution of the cytotoxic effects of carcinogens in the murine large bowel. Carcinogenesis 13:2305-2312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Jacoby, R. F., Bolt, M. J. G., Dolan, M. E., Otto, G., Dudeja, P., Sitrin, M. D. & Brasitus, T. A. (1993) Supplemental dietary calcium fails to alter the acute effects of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine on O6-methylguanine, O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and cellular proliferation in the rat colon. Carcinogenesis 14:1175-1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. McGarrity, T. J., Pfeiffer, L. P. & Colony, P. C. (1988) Cellular proliferation in proximal and distal rat colon during 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 95:343-348.[Medline]

53. Jackson, P. E., Cooper, D. P., O’Connor, P. J. & Povey, A. C. (1999) The relationship between 1,2-dimethylhydrazine dose and the induction of colon tumours: tumour development in female SWR mice does not require a K-ras mutational event. Carcinogenesis 20:509-513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Jackson, P. E., Cooper, D. P., Meyer, T. A., Wood, M., Povey, A. C. & Margison, G. P. (2000) Formation and persistence of O6-methylguanine in the mouse colon following treatment with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine as measured by an O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase inactivation assay. Toxicol. Lett. 115:205-212.[Medline]

55. Jacoby, R. F., Llor, X., Teng, B.-B., Davidson, N. O. & Brasitus, T. A. (1991) Mutations in the K-ras oncogene induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in preneoplasic and neoplastic rat colonic mucosa. J. Clin. Invest. 87:624-630.

56. Zaidi, N. H., Pretlow, A. P., O’Riordan, M. A., Dumenco, L. L., Allay, E. & Gerson, S. L. (1995) Transgenic expression of human MGMT protects against azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci and G to A mutations in the K-ras oncogene of mouse colon. Carcinogenesis 16:451-456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Jackson, P. E., Hall, C. N., Badawi, A. F., O’Connor, P. J., Cooper, D. P. & Povey, A. C. (1996) The frequency of K-ras mutations and DNA alkylation in colorectal tissue from individuals living in Manchester. Mol. Carcinog. 16:12-19.[Medline]

58. Jackson, P. E., Hall, C. N., O’Connor, P. J., Cooper, D. P., Margison, G. P. & Povey, A. C. (1997) Low O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase activity in normal colorectal tissue is associated with colorectal tumours containing a GC-AT transition in the K-ras oncogene. Carcinogenesis 18:1299-1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Herfarth, K. K., Brent, T. P., Danam, R. P., Remack, J. S., Kodner, I. J., Wells, S. A., Jr & Goodfellow, P. J. (1999) A specific CpG methylation pattern of the MGMT promoter region associated with reduced MGMT expression in primary colorectal cancers. Mol. Carcinog. 24:90-98.[Medline]

60. Esteller, M., Toyota, M., Sanchez-Cespedes, M., Capella, G., Peinado, M. A., Watkins, D. N., Issa, J. P., Sidransky, D., Baylin, S. B. & Herman, J. G. (2000) Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is associated with G to A mutations in K-ras in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 60:2368-2371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Whitehall, V. L. J., Walsh, M. D., Young, J., Leggett, B. A. & Jass, J. R. (2001) Methylation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase characterizes a subset of colorectal cancer with low-level DNA microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 61:827-830.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Povey, A. C., Lees, N. P., Harrison, K. L., Hall, C. N. & Margison, G. P. (2002) Altered O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) activity in normal colorectal tissue and adenomas is associated with K-ras GC-AT gene mutations. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 5049:1020.

63. Bignami, M., O’Driscoll, M., Aquilina, G. & Karran, P. (2000) Unmasking a killer: DNA O6-methylguanine and the cytotoxicity of methylating agents. Mutat. Res. 462:71-82.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. M.C.P. Joosen, G. G.C. Kuhnle, S. M. Aspinall, T. M. Barrow, E. Lecommandeur, A. Azqueta, A. R. Collins, and S. A. Bingham
Effect of processed and red meat on endogenous nitrosation and DNA damage
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2009; 30(8): 1402 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
R. Xiao, Y. Su, R. C. M. Simmen, and F. A. Simmen
Dietary soy protein inhibits DNA damage and cell survival of colon epithelial cells through attenuated expression of fatty acid synthase
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): G868 - G876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
W. M Grady and C. M Ulrich
DNA alkylation and DNA methylation: cooperating mechanisms driving the formation of colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas?
Gut, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 318 - 320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. Shen, Y. Kondo, G. L. Rosner, L. Xiao, N. S. Hernandez, J. Vilaythong, P. S. Houlihan, R. S. Krouse, A. R. Prasad, J. G. Einspahr, et al.
MGMT Promoter Methylation and Field Defect in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 21, 2005; 97(18): 1330 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. M. Huycke and H. R. Gaskins
Commensal Bacteria, Redox Stress, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Models
Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2004; 229(7): 586 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Povey, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margison, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Povey, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Margison, G. P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2002 by American Society for Nutrition